DOCSLIB.ORG

Marine and Estuarine Shoreline Modification Issues

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marine and Estuarine Shoreline Modification Issues WHITE PAPER Marine and Estuarine Shoreline Modification Issues Submitted to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Washington Department of Ecology Washington Department of Transportation April 2001 WHITE PAPER Marine and Estuarine Shoreline Modification Issues Submitted to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Washington Department of Ecology Washington Department of Transportation Prepared by Gregory D. Williams and Ronald M. Thom Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 1529 West Sequim Bay Road Sequim, WA 98382 Telephone: 360/ 681-3655 April 17, 2001 Note: Some pages in this document have been purposefully skipped or blank pages inserted so that this document will copy correctly when duplexed. Marine and Estuarine Shoreline Modification Issues LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepared by Battelle Memorial Institute (Battelle) as an account of sponsored research activities. Neither Client nor Battelle nor any person acting on behalf of either: MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information, apparatus, process, or composition disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of, any information, apparatus, process, or composition disclosed in this report. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by Battelle. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of Battelle. wp1 /00-01215-009 white paper shoreline modification.doc April 17, 2001 i Marine and Estuarine Shoreline Modification Issues Table of Contents Overview of Aquatic Habitat Guidelines Project..........................................................................vii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Assessment of the State of Knowledge........................................................................................... 3 Methods.................................................................................................................................... 3 Overview of Ecological and Habitat Issues .................................................................................... 5 Definition of Estuarine and Nearshore Marine Habitats.......................................................... 5 Estuarine and Nearshore Marine Habitat Descriptions and Functions .................................... 6 Definition and Overview of Shoreline Modifications and Restoration ................................... 9 Estuarine and Marine Nearshore Habitat Use By Living Resources ............................................ 11 Salmonids............................................................................................................................... 11 Forage Fish............................................................................................................................. 14 Groundfish ............................................................................................................................. 15 Nearshore Food Webs............................................................................................................ 17 Conceptual Framework for Assessing Impacts............................................................................. 19 Impact Types and Controlling Factors................................................................................... 19 Habitat Controlling Factors, Structure, and Function............................................................ 21 Habitats and Resource Linkages............................................................................................ 22 Effects of Shoreline Modification................................................................................................. 25 Energy Dissipating Structures: Breakwaters and Jetties........................................................ 25 Construction and Operation Techniques ...................................................................... 25 Direct Studies of Biological Impacts............................................................................ 26 Physical Effects of Structure ........................................................................................ 28 Shoreline Stabilization Methods ............................................................................................ 30 Hard Approaches: Bulkheads, Revetments, Seawalls, Groins, Ramps ................................. 31 Construction and Operation Techniques ...................................................................... 31 Direct Studies of Biological Impacts............................................................................ 35 Physical Effects of Structure ........................................................................................ 37 Soft Approaches: Beach Nourishment and Biotechnical Measures....................................... 42 Construction and Operation Techniques ...................................................................... 42 Direct Studies of Biological Impacts............................................................................ 44 Physical Effects of Structure ........................................................................................ 45 Other Structures Affecting Hydrology: Tide Gates, Outfalls, and Artificial Reefs............... 46 Construction and Operation Techniques ...................................................................... 46 Outfalls.................................................................................................................. 47 Artificial Reefs ...................................................................................................... 47 Physical Effects of Structure ........................................................................................ 49 Tide gates .............................................................................................................. 49 Outfalls.................................................................................................................. 50 wp1 /00-01215-009 white paper shoreline modification.doc April 17, 2001 iii Marine and Estuarine Shoreline Modification Issues Artificial Reefs ...................................................................................................... 51 Direct Studies of Biological Impacts............................................................................ 52 Tide Gates ............................................................................................................. 52 Outfalls.................................................................................................................. 53 Artificial Reefs ...................................................................................................... 54 Cumulative Effects of Shoreline Modification ...................................................................... 54 Definition...................................................................................................................... 54 Examples ...................................................................................................................... 55 Scenario for Puget Sound ............................................................................................. 56 Habitat Protection and Mitigation Techniques.............................................................................. 59 Structural Alternatives ........................................................................................................... 59 Non-Structural Management Alternatives ............................................................................. 61 Estuary Restoration................................................................................................................ 62 Background .................................................................................................................. 62 Restoration in Washington State .................................................................................. 63 Direct Studies ............................................................................................................... 65 General Restoration Projects Results .................................................................... 65 Eelgrass ................................................................................................................. 67 Physical Short and Long-term Effects.......................................................................... 69 Site Subsidence ..................................................................................................... 70 Erosion/Deposition................................................................................................ 71 Predation and Herbivory ....................................................................................... 71 Undesirable Species .............................................................................................. 71 Other Lessons.......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coastal Erosion - Orrin H
    COASTAL ZONES AND ESTUARIES – Coastal Erosion - Orrin H. Pilkey, William J. Neal, David M. Bush COASTAL EROSION Orrin H. Pilkey Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines, Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, U.S.A. William J. Neal Department of Geology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI, USA. David M. Bush Department of Geosciences, State University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA, USA. Keywords: erosion, shoreline retreat, sea level rise, barrier islands, beach, coastal management, shoreline armoring, seawalls, sand supply Contents 1. Introduction 2. Causes of Erosion 2.1. Sea Level Rise 2.2. Sand Supply 2.3. Shoreline Engineering 2.4. Wave Energy and Storm Frequency 3. "Special" Cases 4. Solutions to Coastal Erosion 5. The Future Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches Summary Almost all of the world’s shorelines are retreating in a landward direction—a process called shoreline erosion. Sea level rise and the reduction of sand supply to the shoreline by damming of rivers, armoring of shorelines and the dredging of navigation channels are among the major causes of shoreline retreat. As sea levels continue to rise, sometimesUNESCO enhanced by subsidence caused – byEOLSS oil and water extraction, global erosion rates should increase in coming decades. Three response alternatives are available to "solve" the erosionSAMPLE problem. These are cons tructionCHAPTERS of seawalls and other engineering structures, beach nourishment and relocation or abandonment of buildings. No matter what path is chosen, response to the erosion problem is costly. 1. Introduction Coastal erosion is a major problem for developed shorelines everywhere in the world. Such erosion is regarded as a coastal hazard and is a common focus of local and national coastal management.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Flood Defences - Groynes
    Coastal Flood Defences - Groynes Coastal flood defences are key to protecting our coasts against flooding, which is when normally dry, low lying flat land is inundated by sea water. Hard engineering methods are forms of coastal flood defences which mitigate the risk of flooding and coastal erosion and the consequential effects. Hard Engineering Hard engineering methods are often used as a temporary measure to protect against coastal flooding as they are costly and only last for a relatively short amount of time before they require maintenance. However, they are very effective at protecting the coastline in the short-term as they are immediately effective as opposed to some longer term soft engineering methods. But they are often intrusive and can cause issues elsewhere at other areas along the coastline. Groynes are low lying wood or concrete structures which are situated out to sea from the shore. They are designed to trap sediment, dissipate wave energy and restrict the transfer of sediment away from the beach through long shore drift. Longshore drift is caused when prevailing winds blow waves across the shore at an angle which carries sediment along the beach.Groynes prevent this process and therefore, slow the process of erosion at the shore. They can also be permeable or impermeable, permeable groynes allow some sediment to pass through and some longshore drift to take place. However, impermeable groynes are solid and prevent the transfer of any sediment. Advantages and Disadvantages +Groynes are easy to construct. +They have long term durability and are low maintenance. +They reduce the need for the beach to be maintained through beach nourishment and the recycling of sand.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Processes and Causes of Shoreline Erosion and Accretion Causes of Shoreline Erosion and Accretion
    Coastal Processes and Causes of Shoreline Erosion and Accretion and Accretion Erosion Causes of Shoreline Heather Weitzner, Great Lakes Coastal Processes and Hazards Specialist Photo by Brittney Rogers, New York Sea Grant York Photo by Brittney Rogers, New New York Sea Grant Waves breaking on the eastern Lake Ontario shore. Wayne County Cooperative Extension A shoreline is a dynamic environment that evolves under the effects of both natural 1581 Route 88 North and human influences. Many areas along New York’s shorelines are naturally subject Newark, NY 14513-9739 315.331.8415 to erosion. Although human actions can impact the erosion process, natural coastal processes, such as wind, waves or ice movement are constantly eroding and/or building www.nyseagrant.org up the shoreline. This constant change may seem alarming, but erosion and accretion (build up of sediment) are natural phenomena experienced by the shoreline in a sort of give and take relationship. This relationship is of particular interest due to its impact on human uses and development of the shore. This fact sheet aims to introduce these processes and causes of erosion and accretion that affect New York’s shorelines. Waves New York’s Sea Grant Extension Program Wind-driven waves are a primary source of coastal erosion along the Great provides Equal Program and Lakes shorelines. Factors affecting wave height, period and length include: Equal Employment Opportunities in 1. Fetch: the distance the wind blows over open water association with Cornell Cooperative 2. Length of time the wind blows Extension, U.S. Department 3. Speed of the wind of Agriculture and 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Coastal Erosion by Creating Large-Scale and Small-Scale Sediment Cells
    COASTAL EROSION CONTROL BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF SEDIMENT CELLS by L. C. van Rijn, www.leovanrijn-sediment.com, March 2013 1. Introduction Nearly all coastal states have to deal with the problem of coastal erosion. Coastal erosion and accretion has always existed and these processes have contributed to the shaping of the present coastlines. However, coastal erosion now is largely intensified due to human activities. Presently, the total coastal area (including houses and buildings) lost in Europe due to marine erosion is estimated to be about 15 km2 per year. The annual cost of mitigation measures is estimated to be about 3 billion euros per year (EUROSION Study, European Commission, 2004), which is not acceptable. Although engineering projects are aimed at solving the erosion problems, it has long been known that these projects can also contribute to creating problems at other nearby locations (side effects). Dramatic examples of side effects are presented by Douglas et al. (The amount of sand removed from America’s beaches by engineering works, Coastal Sediments, 2003), who state that about 1 billion m3 (109 m3) of sand are removed from the beaches of America by engineering works during the past century. The EUROSION study (2004) recommends to deal with coastal erosion by restoring the overall sediment balance on the scale of coastal cells, which are defined as coastal compartments containing the complete cycle of erosion, deposition, sediment sources and sinks and the transport paths involved. Each cell should have sufficient sediment reservoirs (sources of sediment) in the form of buffer zones between the land and the sea and sediment stocks in the nearshore and offshore coastal zones to compensate by natural or artificial processes (nourishment) for sea level rise effects and human-induced erosional effects leading to an overall favourable sediment status.
    [Show full text]
  • Eyes Over Puget Sound
    Publication No. 21-03-070 Eyes Over Puget Sound Summary Stay connected COVID Stories Critters & Divers Climate and streams Aerial photos Info Picture by: Jesse Miller 2020 in Review Up-to-date observations of visible water quality conditions in Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca Summary conditions at a glance Summary Stay connected COVID Stories Critters & Divers Climate and streams Aerial photos Info The COVID pandemic of 2020 resulted in an information UNIT COVID gap in our work between March and September. Our field Stories crew slowly has restored full capacity and data collection, and EOPS photography resumed in September. Critters Critters in the sediment and water are a testament that and life continues in beautiful ways, and it’s worth going for Divers a dive in Puget Sound when the water is clear. Climate Despite wildfires and a lot of smoke during a dry late and summer, precipitation and flows of major rivers were as Streams expected, or even above normal, for most of the year. MARINE MONITORING MONITORING MARINE With volunteers sending in images on the water we can say that 2020 was a productive year for Puget Sound. TERM Aerial - photos Schools of herring were abundant, Noctiluca blooms were big and numerous, and large amounts of decaying organic material washed onto beaches. LONG Picture by: Jessica Alexanderson Editor: Dr. Christopher Krembs, editorial assistance: Valerie Partridge. PSEMP Marine Waters Workgroup Report of 2018 Summary Stay connected COVID Stories Critters & Divers Climate and streams Aerial photos Info Follow-up on the conditions that led up to 2019, in Puget Sound’s comprehensive marine waters report.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Zone and Estuaries
    CONTENTS COASTAL ZONE AND ESTUARIES Coastal Zone and Estuaries - Volume 1 No. of Pages: 540 ISBN: 978-1-84826-016-0 (eBook) ISBN: 978-1-84826-466-3 (Print Volume) For more information of e-book and Print Volume(s) order, please click here Or contact : [email protected] ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) COASTAL ZONES AND ESTUARIES CONTENTS Coastal Zone and Estuaries 1 Federico Ignacio Isla, Centro de Geología de Costas y del Cuaternario, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina 1. The Coastal Zone 1.1. Climate Change 1.2. Sea Level and Sea Ice Fluctuations 1.3. Coastal Processes 1.4. Sediment Delivery 1.5. Beaches 1.6. Tidal Flats and Marshes 1.7. Mangroves 1.8. Coral Reefs, Coral Cays, Sea Grasses, and Seaweeds 1.9. Eutrophication and Pollution 1.10. Coastal Evolution 2. Estuarine Environments 2.1. Estuaries 2.2. Coastal Lagoons 2.3. Deltas 2.4. Estuarine Evolution 3. Coastal Management 4. New Techniques in Coastal Science 5. Concluding Remarks Coastal Erosion 32 Orrin H. Pilkey, Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines, Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, U.S.A. William J. Neal, Department of Geology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI, USA. David M. Bush, Department of Geosciences, State University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA, USA. 1. Introduction 2. Causes of Erosion 2.1. Sea Level Rise 2.2. Sand Supply 2.3. Shoreline Engineering 2.4. Wave Energy and Storm Frequency 3. Special Cases 4. Solutions to Coastal Erosion 5. The Future Waves and Sediment Transport in the Nearshore Zone 43 Robin G.
    [Show full text]
  • Types and Causes of Beach Erosion Anomaly Areas in the U.S. East Coast Barrier Island System: Stabilized Tidal Inlets
    Middle States Geographer, 2007, 40:158-170 TYPES AND CAUSES OF BEACH EROSION ANOMALY AREAS IN THE U.S. EAST COAST BARRIER ISLAND SYSTEM: STABILIZED TIDAL INLETS Francis A. Galgano Jr. Department of Geography and the Environment Villanova University 800 Lancaster Avenue Villanova, Pennsylvania 19085 ABSTRACT: Contemporary research suggests that most U.S. beaches are eroding, and this has become an important political and economic issue because beachfront development is increasingly at risk. In fact, the Heinz Center and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) estimate that over the next 60 years, beach erosion may claim one out of four homes within 150 meters of the U.S. shoreline. This is significant because approximately 350,000 structures are located with 150 meters of the shoreline in the lower 48 states, not including densely populated coastal cities such as New York and Miami. Along the East Coast, most beaches are eroding at 1 to 1.5 meters per year. However, beach erosion is especially problematic along so-called beach erosion anomaly areas (EAAs) where erosion rates can be as much as five times the rate along adjacent beaches. Identifying and understanding these places is important because property values along U.S. East Coast barrier islands are estimated to be in the trillions of dollars, and the resultant beach erosion may also destroy irreplaceable habitat. There are a number of factors⎯natural and anthropogenic⎯that cause beaches to erode at anomalous rates. This paper will focus on the barrier island system of the U.S. East Coast, classify beach EAAs, and examine beach erosion down drift from stabilized tidal inlets because they are perhaps the most spatially extensive and destructive EAAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Photography Made Easy
    Underwater Photography Made Easy Create amazing photos & video with by Annie Crawley IncludingIncluding highhigh definitiondefinition videovideo andand photophoto galleriesgalleries toto showshow youyou positioningpositioning andand bestbest techniques!techniques! BY ANNIE CRAWLEY SeaLife Cameras Perfect for every environment whether you are headed on a tropical vacation or diving the Puget Sound. These cameras meet all of your imaging needs! ©2013 Annie Crawley www.Sealife-cameras.com www.DiveIntoYourImagination.com Edmonds Underwater Park, Washington All rights reserved. This interactive book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher, Dive Into Your Imagination, LLC a company founded by Annie Crawley committed to change the way a new generation views the Ocean and themselves. Dive Into Your Imagination, Reg. Pat. & Tm. Off. Underwater Photography Made Easy shows you how to take great photos and video with your SeaLife camera system. After our introduction to this interactive book you will learn: 1. Easy to apply tips and tricks to help you create great images. 2. Five quick review steps to make sure your SeaLife camera system is ready before every dive. 3. Neutral buoyancy tips to help you take great underwater photos & video with your SeaLife camera system. 4. Macro and wide angle photography and video basics including color, composition, understanding the rule of thirds, leading diagonals, foreground and background considerations, plus lighting with strobes and video lights. 5. Techniques for both temperate and tropical waters, how to photograph divers, fish behavior and interaction shots, the difference in capturing animal portraits versus recording action in video. You will learn how to capture sharks, turtles, dolphins, clownfish, plus so much more.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Influence of Groyne Fields and Other Hard Defences on the Shoreline Configuration
    1 The Influence of Groyne Fields and Other Hard Defences on the Shoreline Configuration 2 of Soft Cliff Coastlines 3 4 Sally Brown1*, Max Barton1, Robert J Nicholls1 5 6 1. Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, 7 University Road, Highfield, Southampton, UK. S017 1BJ. 8 9 * Sally Brown ([email protected], Telephone: +44(0)2380 594796). 10 11 Abstract: Building defences, such as groynes, on eroding soft cliff coastlines alters the 12 sediment budget, changing the shoreline configuration adjacent to defences. On the 13 down-drift side, the coastline is set-back. This is often believed to be caused by increased 14 erosion via the ‘terminal groyne effect’, resulting in rapid land loss. This paper examines 15 whether the terminal groyne effect always occurs down-drift post defence construction 16 (i.e. whether or not the retreat rate increases down-drift) through case study analysis. 17 18 Nine cases were analysed at Holderness and Christchurch Bay, England. Seven out of 19 nine sites experienced an increase in down-drift retreat rates. For the two remaining sites, 20 retreat rates remained constant after construction, probably as a sediment deficit already 21 existed prior to construction or as sediment movement was restricted further down-drift. 22 For these two sites, a set-back still evolved, leading to the erroneous perception that a 23 terminal groyne effect had developed. Additionally, seven of the nine sites developed a 24 set back up-drift of the initial groyne, leading to the defended sections of coast acting as 1 25 a hard headland, inhabiting long-shore drift.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Workshop Summary Report Salish Sea Fish Assemblage Workshop September 18th 2018 Seattle, Washington Prepared by Zoe van Duivenbode Introduction Changes in the composition and abundance of fish assemblages within the Salish Sea region have long been a topic of interest for management, as they can result in a variety of possible consequences associated with species/population management, habitat conservation, and ecological shifts. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and SeaDoc Society organized a workshop to gather managers, researchers, and policy-makers involved in Salish Sea fish assemblages to share and discuss evidence of fish community change, impacts of change on species and ecosystem recovery, and to align management priorities and identify research needs. Further, the idea for a workshop originally was identified within the Endangered Species Act Recovery Plan for yelloweye rockfish and bocaccio of the Puget Sound/Georgia Basin (NMFS 2017)1. It became clear that assessing rockfish assemblage change without the context of assessing available information on full fish assemblage change would be insufficient for addressing recovery needs. The goal of the workshop was to identify relevant time-series data, evaluate current research, and discuss how existing efforts may contribute to future management strategies. In addition to the host agencies, workshop participants represented a collection of agencies and organizations including the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Puget Sound Restoration Fund, Seattle Aquarium, Samish Tribe’s Department of Natural Resources, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, Washington Department of Ecology, WDFW, University of Washington and more (see appendix for full list of participants and organizations).
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Processes on Long Island
    Shoreline Management on Long Island Coastal Processes on Long Island Coastal Processes Management for ADAPT TO CHANGE Resilient Shorelines MAINTAIN FUNCTION The most appropriate shoreline management RESILIENT option for your shoreline is determined by a SHORELINES WITHSTAND STRESSES number of factors, such as necessity, upland land use, shoreline site conditions, adjacent conditions, ability to be permitted, and others. RECOVER EASILY Costs can be a major consideration for property owners as well. While the cost of some options Artwork by Loriann Cody is mostly for the initial construction, others will require short- or long-term maintenance costs; Proposed construction within the coastal areas therefore, it is important to consider annual and of Long Island requires the property owner to long-term costs when choosing a shoreline apply for permits from local, state and federal management method. agencies. This process may take some time In addition to any associated financial costs, and it is recommended that the applicant there are also considerations of the impacts on contacts the necessary agencies as early as the natural environment and coastal processes. possible. Property owners can also request Some options maintain and/or improve natural pre-application meetings with regulators to coastal processes and features, while others discuss the proposed project. Depending on may negatively impact the natural environment. the complexity of the site or project, property Resilient shorelines tend to work with nature owners can contact a local expert or consultant rather than against it, and are more adaptable that can assist them with understanding and over time to changing conditions. Options that choosing the best option to help stabilize their provide benefits to habitat or coastal processes shorelines and reduce upland risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Erosion
    Guidance for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping Coastal Erosion February 2018 Requirements for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning (Risk MAP) Program are specified separately by statute, regulation, or FEMA policy (primarily the Standards for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping). This document provides guidance to support the requirements and recommends approaches for effective and efficient implementation. Alternate approaches that comply with all requirements are acceptable. For more information, please visit the FEMA Guidelines and Standards for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping webpage (www.fema.gov/guidelines-and-standards-flood-risk-analysis-and- mapping). Copies of the Standards for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping policy, related guidance, technical references, and other information about the guidelines and standards development process are all available here. You can also search directly by document title at www.fema.gov/library. Coastal Erosion February 2018 Guidance Document 40 Page i Document History Affected Section or Date Description Subsection Sections 2.1.1.1 and February Replaced Figures 2.1.1-1, 2.1.1-2, and 2.1.1-3 to contain 2.1.1.2 2018 correct reference to water level above which Primary Frontal Dune reservoir volume is determined. Coastal Erosion February 2018 Guidance Document 40 Page ii Table of Contents 1.0 Overview ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Beach and Shoreline Settings ........................................................................................ 2 1.1.1 Sandy Beach Backed by High Sand Dune: ............................................................. 3 1.1.2 Sandy Beach Backed by Low Sand Dune Berm: .................................................... 4 1.1.3 Sandy Beach Backed by Shore Protection Structure: ............................................. 4 1.1.4 Mixed Grain Size Beach .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]