DOCSLIB.ORG

History of Death with Dignity in California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

www.deathwithdignity.org History of Death with Dignity in California The success in California was not won overnight; it took 25 years of groundwork and perseverance to make it to October 5, 2015, when Governor Jerry Brown signed ABX2-15, End of Life Option Act, into law. PRE-1990 Prior to the 1990’s, a smattering of events presages the fight for death with dignity in California. 1976 The Natural Death Act passes, protecting physicians from being sued for failing to treat incurable illnesses at the request of the patient. 1980 Derek Humphry establishes the Hemlock Society in Santa Monica, advocating legal change and distributing how-to-die information; the Society’s membership grows to 50,000 within a decade. 1983 Elizabeth Bouvia, a quadriplegic suffering from cerebral palsy, sues a California hospital to let her die of self-starvation while receiving comfort care; she loses and files an appeal. 1986 Americans Against Human Suffering is founded, launching a campaign for what would become the 1992 California Death with Dignity Act. 1987 California State Bar Conference passes a resolution to approve physician aid in dying, becoming the state’s first public body to approve physician-assisted dying. TWO DECADES OF ATTEMPTS 1992 Americans for Death with Dignity, formerly Americans Against Human Suffering, place the California Death with Dignity Act on the state ballot as Proposition 161. Modeled on bills introduced by Oregon Senator Frank Roberts the previous year but allowing for euthanasia by lethal injection, the Proposition falls short of passage by 46 to 54 percent. 1994 Advocates, including our predecessors, renew efforts in California after the passage of the Oregon Death with Dignity Act. Death with Dignity Education Center is founded as a national nonprofit organization working to promote a comprehensive, humane, responsive system of care for terminally ill patients. The California Bar once again approves aid-in-dying by an 85-percent majority and no active opposition. 1997Brittany Maynard with her mother, Deborah Ziegler, in 2008. Photo ourtesy of Deborah Ziegler. 2 Encouraged by the reaffirmation of the Oregon law in 1997, California Assemblymember Dion Aroner introduces a death with dignity bill based on the Oregon model. It passes the Judiciary and Appropriations Committees, but it ultimately fails to reach a vote in the full Assembly. 2005 Assemblymembers Lloyd Levine and Patty Berg introduce AB 651, the California Compassionate Choices Act, modeled after Oregon’s law. AB 651 passes from the Senate Judiciary Committee but ultimately fails, as do a couple of later attempts. 2014 A young terminally ill Californian makes international news by announcing she wants the option to die with dignity, but has to leave her home state to do so. Brittany Maynard, together with her family, moves to Oregon where she becomes the symbol of the death with dignity movement. 3 END OF LIFE OPTION ACT’S JOURNEY TO PASSAGE 2015 Partly in response to Maynard’s well-publicized story, California State Senators Bill Monning (D-Carmel) and Lois Wolk (D-Davis), along with Assemblywoman Susan Talamantes Eggman (D-Stockton), and a slew of co-sponsors, carry a bill through a very difficult legislative process. The Death with Dignity Political Fund provides strategic support for the effort. • January 21 – The two Senators introduce SB 128, End of Life Option Act. • March 25 – Senate Health Committee approves the bill 6 to 2, with 1 abstention. California State Senator Lois Wolk testifying before the Senate Health Committee on March 25, 2015 • April 7 – Senate Judiciary Committee passes the bill 5 to 2. • May 28 – Senate Appropriations Committee passes the bill 5 to 2. • June 4 – California State Senate approves the bill 23 to 15. • California Senate hearing on End of Life Option ActThe hearing on SB 128, End of Life Option Act, in the California Senate Health Committee on March 25, 2015. 4 • Summer – After the bill moves to the Assembly, the Catholic Church pressures a handful of Committee on Health members to balk. The bill sponsors pull SB 128 from the Assembly due to insufficient support and continue working on the bill. • August 17 – Assembly Members Susan Talamantes Eggman (D-Stockton), Mark Stone (D-Monterey Bay), and several others introduce an amended version of SB 128, in an extraordinary legislative session dedicated to healthcare. • September 8 – California State Assembly approves ABX2-15 on a 42 to 33 vote. • September 11 – California State Senate approves the bill 23 to 14. • George Eighmey, our Board President (center) with California State Senators Lois Wolk and Bill Monning, sponsors of the End of Life Option Act, in 2015. • October 5 – California Governor Brown signs the End of Life Option Act into law. With the Governor’s signature, thirty-nine million Californians joined the residents of Oregon, Washington, and Vermont in having the option, should they be terminally ill with less than 6 months to live, to end their lives in a humane and dignified manner. One in six Americans, or 50 million people, now have the option of death with dignity. Death with Dignity's Board President George Eighmey (center) with California State Senators Lois Wolk and Bill Monning 5 2016 • February 10 – We propose SB 1002, the End of Life Option Telephone Number, which would create a toll-free telephone line, operated by the California Department of Public Health, providing unbiased information to Californians about their rights and responsibilities under the new End of Life Option Act. • March 30 – SB 1002 passes out of the Senate Committee on Health 5 to 2, but then gets voted down in the Appropriations Committee. Instead, the California Department of Public Health features all pertinent information on its website. I do not know what I would do if I were dying in prolonged and excruciating pain. I am certain, however, that it would be a comfort to be able to consider the options afforded by the bill. And I wouldn’t deny the right to others. —CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR JERRY BROWN, ABX2-15 SIGNING STATEMENT 6 END OF LIFE OPTION ACT IN EFFECT AND UNDER ATTACK • June 9, 2016 – California End of Life Option Act goes into effect. The law is challenged in courts by a group of anti-choice physicians seeking to halt the Act’s implementation. Riverside County Superior Court Judge Daniel A. Ottolia denies their request for an injunction to stop the new law from taking effect but allows a portion of the suit to proceed, eventually setting a trial for September 28, 2018. 2017 • February 7 – California Assembly Member Reginald Byron Jones-Sawyer, Sr. (D-Los Angeles) files AB 282, updating the state’s Penal Code to say that actions undertaken under the End of Life Option Act are exempted from prosecution for aiding suicide. 2018 • January 9 – AB 282 passes unanimously in the Assembly Committee on Public Safety. • January 18 – AB 282 passes in the full Assembly on a 45 to 17 vote. • February 16 – California State Senator Morrell (R) files SB 1336, which would require the patient inform their physician of reasons, selected from a list of four, for requesting the medications, and the bill would also make changes to the annual report. • April 11 – SB 1336 is defeated in committee. • May 15 – AB 282 moves to the California State Senate, where passes in the Public Safety Committee 5 to 2; the bill remains active. Judge Ottolia grants a motion of the law’s opponents, saying the California State Legislature violated the state constitution by passing the law during a special session limited to healthcare. • May 21 – California Attorney General Xavier Becerra appeals, requesting a stay of the May 15 ruling. • May 23 – Fourth District Court of Appeal denies the AG’s request to stay the May 15 ruling. • May 25 – Riverside County Superior Court Judge Daniel A. Ottolia overturns the End of Life Option Act in a formal, written ruling confirming the law is void and unconstitutional. • June 15 – Fourth Court of Appeal grants the AG’s motion to stay the Riverside County Superior Court ruling, overturned the End of Life Option Act, and vacates all scheduled lower court trials. The statute is again the law in the state of California, pending any future rulings to the contrary. v071018 7.
Recommended publications
  • The Necessary Right of Choice for Physician-Assisted Suicide

    The Necessary Right of Choice for Physician-Assisted Suicide

    Student Publications Student Scholarship Fall 2017 The ecesN sary Right of Choice for Physician- Assisted Suicide Kerry E. Ullman Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the Applied Ethics Commons, and the Ethics in Religion Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Ullman, Kerry E., "The eN cessary Right of Choice for Physician-Assisted Suicide" (2017). Student Publications. 574. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/574 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The ecesN sary Right of Choice for Physician-Assisted Suicide Abstract Research-based paper on the importance of the right for terminally ill patients facing a painful death to be able to choose how they end their life Keywords Assisted-Suicide, Maynard, Kevorkian, Terminally-ill Disciplines Applied Ethics | Ethics in Religion Comments Written for FYS 150: Death and the Meaning of Life. Creative Commons License Creative ThiCommons works is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This student research paper is available at The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ student_scholarship/574 Ullman 1 Kerry Ullman Professor Myers, Ph.D. Death and the Meaning of Life - FYS 30 November 2017 Assisted Suicide The Necessary Right of Choice for Physician-Assisted Suicide Imagine being told you have less than six months left to live. On top of that horrific news, you experience excruciating pain every single day that is far more atrocious than anything you could have possibly imagined.
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    KLIM, AN INSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DIE, VOICES IN BIOETHICS, VOL. 2 (2016) An Institutional Right to Die: Neither Coercive nor Immoral Casimir Klim Keywords: right to die, health law, end of life INTRODUCTION The question of whether or not the terminally ill should be granted an institutional right to die rose to the forefront of the national consciousness recently, due in large part to the efforts of the late Brittany Maynard. Diagnosed with untreatable brain cancer, Maynard decided to end her life last fall in Oregon, where state law permits physician-assisted suicide.1 In an editorial for CNN, Maynard wrote: “having this choice at the end of my life has … given me a sense of peace during a tumultuous time that otherwise would be dominated by fear, uncertainty, and pain” (“My right to death with dignity at 29”). Having the option to end her life gave Maynard back her sense of agency and allowed her to die on her own terms. ANALYSIS Laws like Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act are not without their critics, however. Prominent among them is philosopher J. David Velleman, who makes a case against these laws in his essay “Against the Right to Die.” Velleman challenges those—like Maynard—who claim that state-sanctioned assisted suicide can preserve the dignity of the terminally ill. He claims that dignity and autonomy are intertwined in such a way that someone lacking dignity also necessarily lacks the ability to rationally choose suicide. Velleman also argues that the presence of an institutional right to die places an undue pressure on the terminally ill to exercise such a right.
  • The Garamendi Campaign: the Nation's #1 Grassroots Congressional Campaign

    The Garamendi Campaign: the Nation's #1 Grassroots Congressional Campaign

    December, 2012 Contents Garamendi Campaign 1 Calendar 2 Democratic Campaign in 2, 3 Yolo County Paid for by the Davis Democratic Club FPPC 745-850 FEC #35 C00491050 The Garamendi Campaign: The Nation’s #1 Grassroots Congressional Campaign By Andrew Kim, Deputy Campaign Manager Since the launch of our campaign back in January, the principal focus of Congressman John Gara- mendi’s campaign has always been 1) building strong community partnerships and 2) developing the best field operation in the nation. Congressman Garamendi stated back in January, “This election is not just about me. It’s about building a powerful Democratic base to ensure we are a beacon of progress in this newly drawn district.” Since then, we have established over 26 community partnerships – understanding that our partnerships must be grounded upon personal relationships and ser- vice. With our foundation grounded upon the community, our 2nd goal was simple: to have the best-organized field operation, encompassing the best practices of social justice nonprofits, service programs and, of course, the Obama Campaign. However, the key to our success was moving beyond our campaign’s dependency for volunteers but in the development of grass- roots-field programs designed for targeted community groups. Field Program Target Group: Total Participants: Team Leader Program College Students: +16 Student Ambassador Program High School Students: +78 Battleground Woodland Program Latino Students: +33 Battleground California Program College Students: + 43 Patti Garamendi, Bob Schelen, Campaign Committee Program College Students +9 Rep. Garamendi and Andrew Kim Volunteer Action Program Community Volunteers +34 celebrating our victory Grassroots Action Committee Community Volunteers +11 In short, we had students from over 8 high schools and 7 college campuses (over 169 interns), committing close to 12-15 hours per week.
  • AMWA Centennial Meeting Poster and Oral Presentation Abstracts

    AMWA Centennial Meeting Poster and Oral Presentation Abstracts

    AMWA Centennial Meeting Poster and Oral Presentation Abstracts Compiled by: Kimberly Seidel and Carey Wickham Table of Contents: ATTENDING PHYSICIAN POSTER PRESENTATIONS: 1 RESIDENT PHYSICIAN POSTER PRESENTATIONS: 7 RESIDENT PHYSICIAN ORAL PRESENTATIONS: 11 STUDENT POSTER PRESENTATIONS: 14 Attending Physician Poster Presentations: A Patient's Right to Die-- What other options do we have? Author: Mei-Ean Yeow Institution: Rush University Medical Center Presenter: Mei-Ean Yeow, [email protected] Poster number: 1 A patient’s right to die/physician assisted suicide remains a controversial topic both in the medical field and in the community at large, especially with recent high profile cases such as the Brittany Maynard case. Hospice & Palliative care physicians not infrequently face requests for hastened deaths from their patients. We describe two cases and discuss the ethical, legal and moral challenges, along with alternative options that can provide comfort and dignity at the end of life. Cases: Ms A was a 76 yr old female on hospice care with lung cancer which had metastasized to bone and throat. Along with worsening pain, she also felt that she was choking on her secretions. Despite aggressive medical management, she continued to be in distress and pain and asked us to give her medications to help her die. After multiple meetings, a decision was made to pursue palliative sedation (PS). Mr S was a 71 yr old male with renal cell carcinoma, metastasized to brain, lung and liver. He was a retired epidemiologist, who valued his intellect and clear thinking highly. His functional status begun to decline and he was also having problems with word-finding.
  • Death and Dignity Michael Gardner Brigham Young University, Bigkgardner@Gmail.Com

    Death and Dignity Michael Gardner Brigham Young University, [email protected]

    Brigham Young University Prelaw Review Volume 31 Article 4 4-2017 Death and Dignity Michael Gardner Brigham Young University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuplr Part of the Law Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Gardner, Michael (2017) "Death and Dignity," Brigham Young University Prelaw Review: Vol. 31 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuplr/vol31/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brigham Young University Prelaw Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. deaTh and digniTy Kelton Gardner1 n April 2014, Brittany Maynard, a 29-year-old resident of Ana- heim, California and recent graduate student of the University Iof California, was diagnosed with grade four astrocytoma—a form of brain cancer—and was given a prognosis of six months to live. Brittany and her family moved to Oregon, one of only fve states at the time that had legalized physician-assisted suicide. As the quality of her life decreased dramatically, Brittany decided she wanted a physician-assisted suicide. This process would consist of taking prescribed pills (known as barbiturates) in the comfort of her own home at the time of her own choosing. On November 1, 2014, Brittany ended her life as she intended. In an article she posted on CNN’s website, Brittany expressed her gratitude for laws allowing physician-assisted suicide in circumstances of imminent death and tremendous pain.
  • Cargo Celebration

    Cargo Celebration

    October 13-26, 2015 www.lbbusinessjournal.com Cargo Celebration www.POLB.com October 13-26, 2015 Long Beach’s Newsmagazine www.lbbizjournal.com The San Pedro Bay Ports A Year Later: Rebounding From Epic Congestion I By SAMANTHA MEHLINGER Senior Writer his time last year, in the T thick of the peak shipping season for holiday goods arriving from international markets, the movement of these goods through the San Pedro Bay ports began slowing to a crawl. At issue were stalled longshore labor contract negotiations, a shortage of chassis and other supply chain complica - tions. By January, there were more than two dozen ships at anchor in the bay. In February, the White House Secretary of Labor finally stepped into the middle of con - tentious West Coast longshore labor contract negotiations, usher - ing in a contract resolution and Port of Los Angeles photograph getting cargo moving again. THE G OVERNOR ’S E XECUTIVE O RDER Since then, the ports have not only recovered lost business, but Can State’s Business And Environmental Interests Create have grown cargo volumes in comparison to years prior. The progress has been the result of a A Successful And Mutually Beneficial Freight Strategy? joint effort, not just among the ports, but also with supply chain I Brown, who in July penned an ex - California Department of Energy The groups are specifically di - By SAMANTHA MEHLINGER stakeholders, to resolve many of ecutive order for the creation of an and Energy Commission to create rected “to develop an integrated ac - Senior Writer the issues that had caused the tur - action plan that would improve not the action plan.
  • Assisted Suicide

    Assisted Suicide

    STRIPLING, A QUESTION OF MERCY, VOICES IN BIOETHICS, VOL. 1 (2015) A Question of Mercy: Contrasting Current and Past Perspectives on Physician- Assisted Suicide Mahala Yates Stripling, Ph.D. Keywords: right to die, assisted suicide The right-to-die debate was cast into the spotlight on November 1, 2014, when Brittany Maynard, a beautiful young California woman, took her own life by a doctor- prescribed lethal dose. Maynard, in her October 7, 2014, CNN article, “My Right to Death with Dignity at 29,” describes what led up to this decision. 2 Married just over a year, she and her husband were trying for a family. However, after months of suffering from debilitating headaches, she learned on New Year’s Day that she had brain cancer. “Our lives devolved into hospital stays, doctor consultations, and medical research,” she states in her article. Nine days after the diagnosis, she had a disfiguring partial craniotomy and partial resection of her temporal lobe to stop the growth of the tumor. When her aggressive tumor came back three months later, she was given a prognosis of six months to live. She opted out of full brain radiation that would leave her scalp covered with first-degree burns. “My quality of life, as I knew it, would be gone,” she admits in the CNN article. She ruled out hospice care because medication would not relieve her pain or forestall personality changes, including verbal, cognitive, and motor loss. Withholding treatment or removing life support—decisions made in America every day—were not an option for her. Whatever life she had left in her strong young body was mitigated by a deteriorating brain.
  • T 8168047/8 16806'6!81 68078

    T 8168047/8 16806'6!81 68078

    ~, '" ' _ /,:t 8168047/8 16806'6!81 68078 IN THE SUP:RM'ECOURT OF CALIFORNIA 'KANL. STRUSS, et aL., Petitioners, v. MARK D. HORTQN, ,etal.iState.Registratof Vital Statistics, etc., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH -etal;, Interveners. ROBINTyLERetaL., Petitioners, v. STATE OF CALIFÖRNÌAet al., Respondents; . DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH etal., Interveners. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCQ'etaL.,Petitioners, v. MAB. HORTON, et al.,StateRegistrar ofVitaLStatistics, etc., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et aL.,Interveners. APPLICATION'FOR LEA VE.TOFILEAMICI CURIE URIEF AND PROfOSEDUlUEF.QJf LEGISLATIVE AMICI CURIAE IN8UPPORT OF PETITIONER~STRAU8S,ETAL. GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP GIBSON, DUN & CRUTCUER LLP Fre.derick'Brown, SBN065316 Douglas Champion, SBN246515 Ethau'Dettmer",SBN'196046-.- - " Heather Richardson"SBN2495l7 SarahPiepmeier,SBN 227094 Lauren Eber,SBN2465 19 _ Rebecca Justice Lazarus, SBN 227330 LindsayPenrington, SBN249879 EI1iqueMonagas,S:eN 239087 33380uthGrandAvenue KaiponaneaMatsumttra, SBN 255100 Los Angeles,Califomia 90071 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 Telephone: (213) 229-7000 San Francisco, California 94105 Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 ' Telephone: (415) 393..8200 Facsimile: (415) 393..8306 RECE,IVED Attorneys for Amici Curiae, , Current and Former California Legislators JAN"j:S"2009 CLERK SUPREME COURT APPLICATION TO FILE AMICI CURIAE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS AND STATEMENT OF INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, subdivision (f), Amici Curiae current and former California Legislators hereby respectfully apply for leave to fie an amici curiae brief in support of the Petitioners. The proposed amici curiae brief is attached to this Application. The proposed Amici are familar with the questions presented by this case. They believe that there is a need for further argument, as discussed below.
  • History of Death with Dignity in California

    History of Death with Dignity in California

    www.deathwithdignity.org History of Death with Dignity in California The success in California was not won overnight; it took 25 years of groundwork and perseverance to make it to October 5, 2015, when Governor Jerry Brown signed ABX2-15, End of Life Option Act, into law. PRE-1990 Prior to the 1990’s, a smattering of events presages the fight for a death with dignity statute in California. 1976 The Natural Death Act passes, protecting physicians from being sued for failing to treat incurable illnesses at the request of the patient. 1980 Derek Humphry establishes the Hemlock Society in Santa Monica, advocating legal change and distributing how-to-die information; the Society’s membership grows to 50,000 within a decade. 1983 Elizabeth Bouvia, a quadriplegic suffering from cerebral palsy, sues a California hospital to let her die of self-starvation while receiving comfort care; she loses and files an appeal. 1986 Americans Against Human Suffering is founded, launching a campaign for what would become the 1992 California Death with Dignity Act. 1987 California State Bar Conference passes a resolution to approve physician aid in dying, becoming the state’s first public body to approve physician-assisted dying. TWO DECADES OF ATTEMPTS 1992 Americans for Death with Dignity, formerly Americans Against Human Suffering, place the California Death with Dignity Act on the state ballot as Proposition 161. Modeled on bills introduced by Oregon Senator Frank Roberts the previous year but allowing for euthanasia by lethal injection, the Proposition falls short of passage by 46 to 54 percent. 1994 Advocates, including our predecessors, renew efforts in California after the passage of Oregon’s law.
  • California's Assembly Passes Physician Assisted Dying Bill

    California's Assembly Passes Physician Assisted Dying Bill

    BMJ 2015;351:h4919 doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4919 (Published 14 September 2015) Page 1 of 1 News BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.h4919 on 14 September 2015. Downloaded from NEWS California’s assembly passes physician assisted dying bill Owen Dyer Montreal California looks set to permit physician assisted dying next year year. Canada, with a slightly smaller population, is set to drop after its state assembly passed the End of Life Option Act by its criminal prohibition against physicians aiding the terminally 43 votes to 34 on 9 September. The legislation is closely ill to die in February, following a ruling by the Supreme Court modeled on the Oregon law that has permitted terminally ill of Canada last year. But except for Quebec, no Canadian patients to end their life in that state since 1997. Only patients province has a legal framework in place to regulate the practice. who file two written requests and have less than six months to The California law has a sunset clause meaning that it will live can avail themselves of the law. automatically expire in 10 years unless renewed by the The bill had stalled earlier this year in committee, and was not assembly—a last minute concession which enabled the bill’s expected to pass this year, until Governor Jerry Brown called supporters to attract three Republican votes. for a special legislative session in August to consider healthcare The California Medical Association dropped its longstanding funding. Assembly member Susan Eggman, a Democrat and opposition to assisted dying earlier this year, formally adopting former hospice worker, seized the opportunity to reintroduce a neutral stance.
  • Expanding the Concept of 'Care': a Narrative Study

    Expanding the Concept of 'Care': a Narrative Study

    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 10-23-2017 9:30 AM Expanding the concept of ‘care’: A narrative study exploring lessons from end-of-life patients to inform ‘Medical Assistance in Dying’ curriculum in Canada Jill Dombroski The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Kathryn Hibbert The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Education A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Education © Jill Dombroski 2017 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Interprofessional Education Commons, and the Palliative Care Commons Recommended Citation Dombroski, Jill, "Expanding the concept of ‘care’: A narrative study exploring lessons from end-of-life patients to inform ‘Medical Assistance in Dying’ curriculum in Canada" (2017). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 5027. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5027 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract This research primarily investigates what we can learn from patient experiences that can help inform the expected curricula that will be developed in response to the new Canadian legislation regarding Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD). This is a compelling area of research because of the rapidly evolving attitudes in the general population — largely driven by terminally ill patients asserting their legal rights over their bodies and the decision to put an end to their lives as a consequence of the illness they face.
  • California Right-To-Die Law Will Take Effect in Three Months (Update) 10 March 2016, by Jonathan J

    California Right-To-Die Law Will Take Effect in Three Months (Update) 10 March 2016, by Jonathan J

    California right-to-die law will take effect in three months (Update) 10 March 2016, by Jonathan J. Cooper And Julie Watson Terminally ill California residents will be able to Democratic Sen. Bill Monning, who authored the bill, legally end their lives with medication prescribed said patients or their family members have been by a doctor in three months, ending months of contacting his office daily since Gov. Jerry Brown uncertainty for dying patients hoping to use the signed the legislation last October. practice. "It's obviously a great sense of achievement and State lawmakers adjourned a special session on historic achievement for California, but it is health care Thursday, paving the way for the law tempered by the loss of great people who fought to allowing physician-assisted suicide to take effect get the billed passed," he said. on June 9. California's law includes strong protections for both The law approved last year made California the patients and physicians, Monning said. fifth state in the nation to adopt the practice, but patients have been left in limbo until the special Religious institutions, like Catholic hospitals, can session wrapped up and the law could take effect opt out and ban their doctors from participating in 90 days later. any assisted deaths. Patients must have two separate meetings with a physician before a doctor The legislation passed following the heavily can prescribe a life-ending drug. publicized case of Brittany Maynard, a 29-year-old California woman with brain cancer who moved to If there is any doubt over the person's mental Oregon to legally end her life in 2014.