Arxiv:1805.01467V1 [Astro-Ph.GA] 3 May 2018 the Existence of Stellar Mass Black Holes (Abbott Et Al
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Draft version May 7, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 A Population of Bona Fide Intermediate Mass Black Holes Identified as Low Luminosity Active Galactic Nuclei Igor V. Chilingarian,1, 2 Ivan Yu. Katkov,2 Ivan Yu. Zolotukhin,2, 3, 4 Kirill A. Grishin,2, 5 Yuri Beletsky,6 Konstantina Boutsia,6 and David J. Osip6 1Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 60 Garden St. MS09, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2Sternberg Astronomical Institute, M.V.Lomonosov Moscow State University, Universitetsky prospect 13, Moscow, 119992, Russia 3Special Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhnij Arkhyz 369167, Russia 4Universit´ede Toulouse; UPS-OMP, IRAP, 9 avenue du Colonel Roche, BP 44346, F-31028 Toulouse Cedex 4, France 5Department of Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1 Vorobyovy Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia 6Las Campanas Observatory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Colina el Pino, Casilla 601 La Serena, Chile (Received April 26, 2018; Revised {; Accepted {) Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT Nearly every massive galaxy harbors a supermassive black hole (SMBH) in its nucleus. SMBH masses are millions to billions M , and they correlate with properties of spheroids of their host galaxies. While the SMBH growth channels, mergers and gas accretion, are well established, their origin remains 5 6 uncertain: they could have either emerged from massive \seeds" (10 10 M ) formed by direct − collapse of gas clouds in the early Universe or from smaller (100M ) black holes, end-products of first stars. The latter channel would leave behind numerous intermediate mass black holes (IMBHs, 2 5 10 10 M ). Although many IMBH candidates have been identified, none is accepted as definitive, − thus their very existence is still debated. Using data mining in wide-field sky surveys and applying dedicated analysis to archival and follow-up optical spectra, we identified a sample of 305 IMBH 4 5 candidates having masses 3 10 < MBH < 2 10 M , which reside in galaxy centers and are × × accreting gas that creates characteristic signatures of a type I active galactic nucleus (AGN). We confirmed the AGN nature of ten sources (including five previously known objects which validate our method) by detecting the X-ray emission from their accretion discs, thus defining the first bona fide sample of IMBHs in galactic nuclei. All IMBH host galaxies possess small bulges and sit on the low- mass extension of the MBH Mbulge scaling relation suggesting that they must have experienced very − few if any major mergers over their lifetime. The very existence of nuclear IMBHs supports the stellar mass seed scenario of the massive black hole formation. Keywords: cosmology: observations | early universe | galaxies: active | galaxies: nuclei | galaxies: Seyfert | quasars: supermassive black holes 1. INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATION & Milosavljevi´c 2005) and by accreting gas during the arXiv:1805.01467v1 [astro-ph.GA] 3 May 2018 The existence of stellar mass black holes (Abbott et al. AGN/quasar phase (Volonteri 2012), however, their ori- 2016) and giant black holes millions to billions times gin still remains unclear: they could have either emerged 5 6 from massive \seeds" (10 10 M ) formed by direct more massive than the Sun is observationally estab- − lished (Sch¨odelet al. 2002; Miyoshi et al. 1995). Massive collapse of large gas clouds in the early Universe (Loeb black holes in galaxy centers are believed to co-evolve & Rasio 1994) or from smaller (100M ) black holes, with spheroids of their hosts (Kormendy & Ho 2013), end-products of first stars (Madau & Rees 2001), which grow via coalescences during galaxy mergers (Merritt must have also created a rich, yet undetected population 2 5 of intermediate mass black holes (IMBHs, 10 10 M ). − Two observational phenomena allow us to detect and Corresponding author: Igor Chilingarian estimate masses of central black holes in large samples of [email protected], [email protected] galaxies: (i) dynamic signatures observed as high rota- 2 Chilingarian et al. tional velocities or velocity dispersions of stars and gas past claims of IMBHs in globular clusters (Noyola et al. in circumnuclear regions of galaxies (Miyoshi et al. 1995; 2010) were refuted by subsequent analysis (Zocchi et al. Kormendy & Richstone 1995; Seth et al. 2014); (ii) AGN 2017); (iii) several low luminosity AGN in dwarf galaxies and quasars, which appear when a massive black hole found using optical spectra and later confirmed in X-ray is caught while accreting gas (Elvis 2000) and, hence, (Dong et al. 2007; Reines et al. 2013; Baldassare et al. 4 5 growing. The discovery of quasars in the early Uni- 2015) (5 10 < MBH < 3 10 M ) but the search × × verse (z > 6:3, that is 750{900 Myr after the Big Bang) approach excluded luminous galaxies and involved sub- hosting super-massive black holes (SMBHs) as heavy as stantial amount of manual data analysis applied on a per 10 10 M (Mortlock et al. 2011; Wu et al. 2015) cannot object basis. Here we call \reliable" the black hole mass be explained by gas accretion on stellar mass black hole estimates techniques, which have calibration uncertain- seeds (< 100M ) alone. Even if formed right after the ties of at most a factor of 2{3, such as reverberation Big Bang∼ by the first generation of Population iii stars, mapping, stellar dynamics, pulsar timing, X-ray vari- it would take over 1 Gyr to foster an SMBH because the ability, broad Hα scaling. We do not consider IMBH accretion rate cannot significantly exceed the Eddington candidates relying on some average Eddington ratios in limit during extended periods of time. Population iii AGN, MBH σbulge relation or the fundamental plane of − stars might have formed in dense clusters in primordial the black hole activity, which have intrinsic uncertainties density fluctuations, which could then evolve into more of 0.8{1.5 dex. massive SMBH seeds by collisions and/or core collapse In this paper we present the results of the first system- (Portegies Zwart et al. 2004). Alternatively, the rapid atic search for IMBHs in AGN without applying a priori inflow and subsequent direct collapse of gas clouds (Loeb pre-selection filtering criteria to the input galaxy sam- & Rasio 1994; Begelman et al. 2006) can form massive ple. We developed an automated workflow that analyzed 5 6 seeds (M > 10 10 M ). The latter scenario solves 1 million galaxies spectra from the SDSS Data Release − the SMBH early formation puzzle but leads to a gap in 7 (DR7) spectroscopic catalog and measured central BH the present-day black hole mass function in the IMBH masses for those objects that demonstrate broad Hα line 5 regime (100 < MBH < 1 10 M ), whereas stellar mass and narrow-line photoionization signatures of accreting × seeds should∼ leave behind∼ a large number of IMBHs. BHs. Throughout this work we define an IMBH as an 2 5 Therefore, the elusive IMBH population holds a clue to object in the mass range between 10 and 10 M and we 5 the understanding of SMBH formation. look for IMBH candidates having a mass < 2 10 M × The first evidence for the existence of IMBHs came in because of the internal precision of the virial mass esti- late 80s, when two dwarf galaxies with stellar masses of mate of about 0:3 dex. 9 ∼ about 10 M hosting AGN were identified: Pox 52, a dwarf elliptical galaxy (Kunth et al. 1987; Barth et al. 2. DATA ANALYSIS APPROACH 2004) and NGC 4395, a low-luminosity spiral (Filip- 2.1. An automated IMBH search workflow penko & Sargent 1989; Wrobel & Ho 2006). They both An AGN creates specific signatures in an optical spec- host central black holes with the mass estimates around 5 trum of a galaxy (Elvis 2000): X-ray photons from the 3 10 M (Filippenko & Ho 2003; Peterson et al. 2005; × corona of an accretion disc around the black hole ionize Thornton et al. 2008) and are nowadays considered too gas out to a few kiloparsec away, which then produces massive to be called IMBH, however, they ignited the easily detectable emission lines (Fig.1). The width and interest towards search for less massive examples. the flux of an allowed recombination line (e.g. hydrogen Despite substantial observing time investments over Hα) emitted from the broad line region in the immediate the past two decades, only a few IMBH candidates were vicinity of a central black hole provide a virial estimate identified with reliable mass estimates: (i) the serendip- of its mass (Greene & Ho 2005; Reines et al. 2013). We itously discovered hyperluminous X-ray source HLX- have designed an automated workflow that uses data 1 in a nearby galaxy (Webb et al. 2012) having the 4 5 mining in optical and X-ray astronomical data archives mass between 10 and 10 M estimated from the X- publicly available in the international Virtual Observa- ray flux and radio emission of the relativistic jet, which, tory to search for AGN signatures of IMBHs. however, may be a stellar mass black hole accreting in The workflow automatically analyzed (Fig.1) about the super-critical regime with a beamed X-ray radia- 1,000,000 optical spectra of galaxies and quasars from tion along the line-of-sight (King & Lasota 2014); (ii) a the legacy sample of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data 4,000 M IMBH in the globular cluster 47 Tuc detected Release 7 (SDSS DR7, Abazajian et al. 2009) without using stellar dynamics and pulsar timing (Kızıltan et al. any pre-selection on host galaxy luminosity or redshift. 2017), although one has to keep in mind that several We used a non-parametric representation of a narrow IMBH population identified as AGN 3 emission line profile (Chilingarian et al.