2020 11-03 General Election Results

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2020 11-03 General Election Results 8/3/2021 Results - Salt Lake - Election Night Reporting SALT LAKE COUNTY, UT NOVEMBER 3, 2020 2020 GENERAL ELECTION NIGHT REPORTING Final Official Election Results FEDERAL PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES Percentage Votes DEM JOSEPH R. BIDEN / KAMALA D. HARRIS 53.04% 289,906 REP DONALD J. TRUMP / MICHAEL R. PENCE 42.11% 230,174 LIB JO JORGENSEN / JEREMY COHEN 2.24% 12,219 WRITE-IN 0.99% 5,406 UNA KANYE WEST / MICHELLE TIDBALL 0.47% 2,590 GRN HOWIE HAWKINS / ANGELA WALKER 0.40% 2,203 CON DON BLANKENSHIP / WILLIAM MOHR 0.29% 1,570 UNA BROCK PIERCE / KARLA BALLARD 0.17% 947 UNA JOE MCHUGH / ELIZABETH STORM 0.14% 778 UNA GLORIA LA RIVA 0.11% 579 BRIAN CARROLL 0.02% 136 JADE SIMMONS / CLAUDELIAH J. ROZE 0.01% 58 TOM HOEFLING 0.00% 13 PRESIDENT R. BODDIE / ERIC C. STONEHAM 0.00% 1 KATHERINE FORBES 0.00% 1 PRINCESS KHADIJAH M. JACOB-FAMBRO / KHADIJAH 0.00% 0 MARYAM JACOB SR. 546,581 U.S. REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #2 Percentage Votes https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/UT/Salt_Lake/107137/Web02.264677/#/?undefined 1/22 8/3/2021 Results - Salt Lake - Election Night Reporting DEM KAEL WESTON 65.21% 76,278 REP CHRIS STEWART 30.79% 36,018 LIB J. ROBERT LATHAM 4.00% 4,684 116,980 U.S. REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #3 Percentage Votes REP JOHN CURTIS 54.85% 57,520 DEM DEVIN D. THORPE 42.30% 44,360 CON DANIEL CLYDE CUMMINGS 1.42% 1,487 UUP THOMAS G. MCNEILL 1.26% 1,320 WRITE-IN 0.11% 116 TREY ROBINSON 0.06% 58 J L F 0.00% 0 104,861 U.S. REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #4 Percentage Votes DEM BEN MCADAMS 51.67% 158,035 REP BURGESS OWENS 42.67% 130,519 LIB JOHN MOLNAR 3.35% 10,259 UUP JONIA M BRODERICK 2.11% 6,453 WRITE-IN 0.19% 593 JONATHAN L. PETERSON 0.01% 23 305,882 STATE GOVERNOR Percentage Votes https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/UT/Salt_Lake/107137/Web02.264677/#/?undefined 2/22 8/3/2021 Results - Salt Lake - Election Night Reporting REP SPENCER J. COX / DEIDRE M. HENDERSON 49.91% 266,177 DEM CHRIS PETERSON / KARINA BROWN 44.67% 238,249 LIB DANIEL RHEAD COTTAM / BARRY EVAN SHORT 3.00% 16,001 IAP GREG DUERDEN / WAYNE HILL 1.15% 6,137 WRITE-IN 0.82% 4,377 MADELINE KAZANTZIS / ED KENNEDY 0.41% 2,193 KRISTENA M. CONLIN 0.03% 153 RICHARD T. WHITNEY 0.01% 53 TYLER SCOTT BATTY / GREGORY C. JOHNSON 0.00% 3 533,343 ATTORNEY GENERAL Percentage Votes DEM GREG SKORDAS 49.11% 257,002 REP SEAN D. REYES 45.32% 237,158 LIB RUDY J. BAUTISTA 5.58% 29,189 523,349 STATE AUDITOR Percentage Votes REP JOHN 'FRUGAL' DOUGALL 66.28% 311,457 UUP BRIAN L. FABBI 19.05% 89,543 CON JEFFREY L. OSTLER 14.67% 68,938 469,938 STATE TREASURER Percentage Votes REP DAVID DAMSCHEN 66.55% 310,000 LIB JOSEPH SPECIALE 20.90% 97,351 CON RICHARD PROCTOR 12.55% 58,438 https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/UT/Salt_Lake/107137/Web02.264677/#/?undefined 3/22 8/3/2021 Results - Salt Lake - Election Night Reporting 465,789 STATE SENATE DISTRICT #1 Percentage Votes DEM LUZ ESCAMILLA 64.73% 17,764 REP JIM WHITED 35.27% 9,681 27,445 STATE SENATE DISTRICT #6 Percentage Votes REP WAYNE A. HARPER 55.62% 23,525 DEM ERIKA LARSEN 44.38% 18,774 42,299 STATE SENATE DISTRICT #8 Percentage Votes DEM KATHLEEN RIEBE 56.62% 28,811 REP BRIAN ZEHNDER 43.38% 22,078 50,889 STATE SENATE DISTRICT #10 Percentage Votes REP LINCOLN FILLMORE 65.17% 44,126 DEM DAN MCCLELLAN 34.83% 23,586 67,712 STATE SENATE DISTRICT #13 Percentage Votes REP JAKE ANDEREGG 100.00% 8,851 8,851 https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/UT/Salt_Lake/107137/Web02.264677/#/?undefined 4/22 8/3/2021 Results - Salt Lake - Election Night Reporting STATE SENATE DISTRICT #23 Percentage Votes REP TODD WEILER 82.05% 2,742 WRITE-IN 10.59% 354 MARCI GREEN CAMPBELL 7.36% 246 3,342 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #22 Percentage Votes DEM CLARE COLLARD 50.94% 7,239 REP ANTHONY E. LOUBET 49.06% 6,973 14,212 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #23 Percentage Votes DEM SANDRA HOLLINS 73.61% 7,879 REP BRADLEY A. BORDEN 26.39% 2,825 10,704 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #24 Percentage Votes DEM JEN DAILEY-PROVOST 100.00% 18,119 18,119 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #25 Percentage Votes DEM JOEL K. BRISCOE 82.75% 16,475 REP KAREL JOY MCDONOUGH 14.20% 2,827 UUP CABOT W. NELSON 3.05% 607 19,909 https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/UT/Salt_Lake/107137/Web02.264677/#/?undefined 5/22 8/3/2021 Results - Salt Lake - Election Night Reporting STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #26 Percentage Votes DEM ANGELA ROMERO 100.00% 10,824 10,824 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #28 Percentage Votes DEM BRIAN S. KING 71.84% 15,138 REP CAROL L. HUNTER 28.16% 5,933 21,071 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #30 Percentage Votes REP MIKE WINDER 58.30% 7,611 DEM ROBERT S. BURCH, JR. 41.70% 5,443 13,054 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #31 Percentage Votes DEM ELIZABETH L. WEIGHT 56.61% 6,261 REP MATT MACPHERSON 43.39% 4,799 11,060 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #32 Percentage Votes DEM SUZANNE HARRISON 55.08% 11,405 REP CINDIE QUINTANA 44.92% 9,301 20,706 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #33 https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/UT/Salt_Lake/107137/Web02.264677/#/?undefined 6/22 8/3/2021 Results - Salt Lake - Election Night Reporting Percentage Votes REP CRAIG HALL 50.69% 5,398 DEM FATIMA DIRIE 49.31% 5,252 10,650 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #34 Percentage Votes DEM KAREN KWAN 56.99% 8,558 REP DAVID YOUNG 43.01% 6,458 15,016 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #35 Percentage Votes DEM MARK A. WHEATLEY 67.77% 9,867 REP LUKE GUSTAFSON 27.69% 4,031 UUP ADAM C. BEAN 4.55% 662 14,560 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #36 Percentage Votes DEM DOUG OWENS 59.70% 14,350 REP LISA BAGLEY 38.96% 9,365 CON NISHAN BEGLARIAN 1.34% 321 24,036 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #37 Percentage Votes DEM CAROL SPACKMAN MOSS 61.13% 13,037 REP MARYANN CHRISTENSEN 38.87% 8,288 21,325 https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/UT/Salt_Lake/107137/Web02.264677/#/?undefined 7/22 8/3/2021 Results - Salt Lake - Election Night Reporting STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #38 Percentage Votes DEM ASHLEE MATTHEWS 51.67% 6,143 REP ERIC HUTCHINGS 48.33% 5,747 11,890 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #39 Percentage Votes REP JIM DUNNIGAN 50.27% 7,836 DEM LYNETTE WENDEL 49.73% 7,752 15,588 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #40 Percentage Votes DEM STEPHANIE PITCHER 69.30% 13,261 REP JEREMIAH K CLARK 30.53% 5,841 WRITE-IN 0.14% 26 DAVID A ELSE 0.04% 7 19,135 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #41 Percentage Votes REP MARK A. STRONG 69.40% 17,312 DEM WENDY GARVIN 24.18% 6,032 UUP DAVID M LUNDGREN 6.42% 1,602 24,946 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #42 Percentage Votes REP JORDAN TEUSCHER 58.53% 14,011 https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/UT/Salt_Lake/107137/Web02.264677/#/?undefined 8/22 8/3/2021 Results - Salt Lake - Election Night Reporting DEM SAMUEL WINKLER 36.55% 8,749 UUP RYAN BOUDWIN 4.92% 1,178 23,938 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #43 Percentage Votes REP CHERYL ACTON 52.36% 7,988 DEM DIANE LEWIS 42.23% 6,443 UUP JEFFERSON BARDIN 5.41% 825 15,256 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #44 Percentage Votes DEM ANDREW STODDARD 55.69% 10,346 REP KYLE BIRD 40.36% 7,498 UUP JOHN JACKSON 3.95% 733 18,577 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #45 Percentage Votes REP STEVE ELIASON 50.20% 9,748 DEM WENDY DAVIS 49.80% 9,671 19,419 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #46 Percentage Votes DEM GAY LYNN BENNION 56.61% 12,467 REP JAREN L DAVIS 38.69% 8,520 LIB LEE ANNE WALKER 4.70% 1,034 22,021 https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/UT/Salt_Lake/107137/Web02.264677/#/?undefined 9/22 8/3/2021 Results - Salt Lake - Election Night Reporting STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #47 Percentage Votes REP STEVE CHRISTIANSEN 57.49% 9,285 DEM SCOTT BELL 42.51% 6,867 16,152 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #49 Percentage Votes REP ROBERT SPENDLOVE 53.84% 12,075 DEM SIAMAK KHADJENOURY 46.16% 10,353 22,428 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #50 Percentage Votes REP SUSAN PULSIPHER 71.47% 19,125 DEM EMILY C. HAYES 28.53% 7,636 26,761 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #51 Percentage Votes REP JEFF STENQUIST 63.36% 12,773 DEM DAVID HUNT 36.64% 7,385 20,158 STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT #52 Percentage Votes REP CANDICE B. PIERUCCI 69.86% 21,126 DEM CATHERINE VOUTAZ 30.14% 9,113 30,239 https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/UT/Salt_Lake/107137/Web02.264677/#/?undefined 10/22 8/3/2021 Results - Salt Lake - Election Night Reporting STATE SCHOOL BOARD STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DISTRICT #3 Percentage Votes DEM BRETT GARNER 52.87% 19,724 REP MATT HYMAS 47.13% 17,583 37,307 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DISTRICT #7 Percentage Votes DEM CAROL BARLOW LEAR 100.00% 68,400 68,400 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DISTRICT #8 Percentage Votes REP JANET A. CANNON 100.00% 72,201 72,201 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DISTRICT #10 Percentage Votes REP MOLLY L. HART 100.00% 81,974 81,974 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DISTRICT #11 Percentage Votes REP NATALIE J CLINE 68.70% 76,984 UNA TONY ZANI 31.30% 35,073 112,057 https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/UT/Salt_Lake/107137/Web02.264677/#/?undefined 11/22 8/3/2021 Results - Salt Lake - Election Night Reporting COUNTY COUNTY MAYOR Percentage Votes DEM JENNY WILSON 51.88% 273,746 REP TRENT STAGGS 44.78% 236,283 GRN MICHAEL W.
Recommended publications
  • Utah Conservation Community Legislative Update
    UTAH CONSERVATION COMMUNITY LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2021 General Legislative Session Issue #5 February 21, 2021 Welcome to the 2021 Legislative Update issue will prepare you to contact your legislators with your This issue includes highlights of week five, what we can opinions and concerns! expect in the week ahead, and information for protecting wildlife and the environment. Please direct any questions or ACTION ALERT! comments to Steve Erickson: [email protected]. Our worries about Rep. Brammer’s Utah Lake Authority bill were justified. (See the description of HB 364 below.) About the Legislative Update This bill raises serious Constitutional questions around The Legislative Update is made possible by the Utah the Public Trust and threatens to stir up toxins and heavy Audubon Council and contributing organizations. Each metals by dredging the lake bottom for development and Update provides bill and budget item descriptions and private profit. It would halt the ongoing environmental status updates throughout the Session, as well as important review by DNR/FFSL, and it hasn’t been vetted by the Session dates and key committees. For the most up-to-date existing water task forces that purport to keep renegade information and the names and contact information for all legislation like this from getting any traction. Call legislators, check the Legislature’s website at Governor Cox and tell him to send this nonsense to www.le.utah.gov. The Legislative Update focuses on further study - or just deep six it. 801.538.1000 legislative information pertaining to wildlife, sensitive and And do the same over SB 179, which would facilitate the invasive species, public lands, state parks, SITLA land construction of the Uintah Basin Railway for oil, gas and management, energy development, renewable energy and coal exports to China, Japan and elsewhere, exacerbating conservation, and water issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Policy Committee May 24, 2021 Agenda
    Legislative Policy Committee May 24, 2021 Agenda ARP Interim Issues #CitiesWork ULCT Resolutions Special Session Update Photo by Lucas Ludwig on Unsplash Get your pens and papers (and keyboards) ready Use LPC information as a springboard to talk to your legislator about: 1) How your city will invest ARP $ 2) What your city is doing to plan for growth (housing, econ. dev.) & how Photo by David Travis on Unsplash the Legislature can partner with you 3) Public safety policy ULCT interim plan of attack in general • ULCT will help you with big picture info on: • Housing data • Infrastructure costs • Public safety policy impacts, costs, and benefits • And more • ULCT will meet with key legislators, stakeholders, & the media • Your city/town needs to provide the community specifics to your legislators #CitiesWork American Rescue Plan Photo by Nathan Dumlao on Unsplash U.S. Treasury Guidance • Mitigating the impact of COVID-19. Similar uses under CARES Public Health funding. • Support the families and businesses continuing to struggle. Economic Hardship Encourages use for most severe communities and populations that were already disadvantaged. • Provide premium pay for essential, in person, city or town Essential Workers employees, and grants to the private sector for premium pay. Public Sector Revenues • Cover lost revenue to the city or town. Water, Sewer, and Broadband • Invest in critical infrastructure Infrastructure Restrictions and Other • Restricted Uses: Review Pages 78-81 and 96-97 • Direct deposit to pensions • Deposit in rainy day
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 State Legislator Pledge Signers
    I pledge that, as a member of the state legislature, I will cosponsor, vote for, and defend the resolution applying for an Article V convention for the sole purpose of enacting term limits on Congress. The U.S. Term Limits Article V Pledge Signers 2021 State Legislators 1250 Connecticut Ave NW Suite 200 ALABAMA S022 David Livingston H073 Karen Mathiak Washington, D.C. 20036 Successfully passed a term S028 Kate Brophy McGee H097 Bonnie Rich (202) 261-3532 limits only resolution. H098 David Clark termlimits.org CALIFORNIA H103 Timothy Barr ALASKA H048 Blanca Rubio H104 Chuck Efstration H030 Ron Gillham H105 Donna McLeod COLORADO H110 Clint Crowe ARKANSAS H016 Andres Pico H119 Marcus Wiedower H024 Bruce Cozart H022 Margo Herzl H131 Beth Camp H042 Mark Perry H039 Mark Baisley H141 Dale Washburn H071 Joe Cloud H048 Tonya Van Beber H147 Heath Clark H049 Michael Lynch H151 Gerald Greene ARIZONA H060 Ron Hanks H157 Bill Werkheiser H001 Noel Campbell H062 Donald Valdez H161 Bill Hitchens H001 Judy Burges H063 Dan Woog H162 Carl Gilliard H001 Quang Nguyen H064 Richard Holtorf H164 Ron Stephens H002 Andrea Dalessandro S001 Jerry Sonnenberg H166 Jesse Petrea H002 Daniel Hernandez S010 Larry Liston H176 James Burchett H003 Alma Hernandez S023 Barbara Kirkmeyer H177 Dexter Sharper H005 Leo Biasiucci H179 Don Hogan H006 Walter Blackman CONNECTICUT S008 Russ Goodman H007 Arlando Teller H132 Brian Farnen S013 Carden Summers H008 David Cook H149 Kimberly Fiorello S017 Brian Strickland H011 Mark Finchem S021 Brandon Beach H012 Travis Grantham FLORIDA S027 Greg Dolezal H014 Gail Griffin Successfully passed a term S030 Mike Dugan H015 Steve Kaiser limits only resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Did You Know?
    You’ve heard about Proposition 2, but DID YOU KNOW? A Washington DC lobbying organization (Marijuana Policy Project) representing the marijuana industry (big growers and distributors), whose stated purpose is to legalize recreational marijuana, is the primary backer of Utah’s petition, spending millions to change laws in Utah and two other states in 2018. It’s about MONEY. CHILDREN • The only penalty for those who possess • Children and teens could obtain without a medical card is an infraction and 9 permission to use a very high potency a maximum $100 fine. THC marijuana.1 • Until July 2020, even without a medical • Utah law already allows children with marijuana card, a person claiming a intractable seizures to seek treatment by “qualifying condition” can use, possess or physicians using CBD oil2 or prescription manufacture marijuana products under the Epidiolex3 to help reduce seizures. initiative’s affirmative defense provision if they are charged.10 • The highest youth marijuana use in the country is in states that have legalized • Qualifying conditions are so broad (e.g., marijuana, even for medical purposes and chronic pain, nausea, autism) as to allow use is increasing.4 nearly anyone to qualify for a recommendation.11 LACK OF REGULATION NO Rx, NO PHARMACIES • Local city and county officials will be unable to prevent marijuana growing • No pharmacists and pharmacies - people warehouses or dispensaries from operating without medical training (“budtenders”) in your community except within 300 ft. will sell marijuana products (including of residential neighborhoods and 600 ft of THC) through marijuana dispensaries in 12 churches, schools and parks.5 your community.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2021 COVID-19 Report of House District 46
    Ju2012ly 2021 COVID-19 Report of House District 46 A Special Report to Representative Gay Lynn Bennion Prepared by the Strategic Initiatives Group Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel Membership of the Utah House of Representatives District Representative District Representative 1 Joel Ferry 39 James A. Dunnigan 2 Jefferson Moss 40 Stephanie Pitcher 3 Mike J. Petersen 41 Mark A. Strong 4 Dan N. Johnson 42 Jordan D. Teuscher 5 Casey Snider 43 Cheryl K. Acton 6 A. Cory Maloy 44 Andrew Stoddard 7 Ryan D. Wilcox 45 Steve Eliason 8 Steve Waldrip 46 Gay Lynn Bennion 9 Calvin R. Musselman 47 Steve R. Christiansen 10 Rosemary T. Lesser 48 Keven J. Stratton 11 Kelly B. Miles 49 Robert M. Spendlove 12 Mike Schultz 50 Susan Pulsipher 13 Paul Ray 51 Jeffrey D. Stenquist 14 Karianne Lisonbee 52 Candice B. Pierucci 15 Brad R. Wilson 53 Kera Birkeland 16 Stephen G. Handy 54 Mike L. Kohler 17 Stewart E. Barlow 55 Scott H. Chew 18 Timothy D. Hawkes 56 Kay J. Christofferson 19 Raymond P. Ward 57 Jon Hawkins 20 Melissa G. Ballard 58 Steven J. Lund 21 Douglas V. Sagers 59 Val L. Peterson 22 Clare Collard 60 Nelson T. Abbott 23 Sandra Hollins 61 Marsha Judkins 24 Jennifer Dailey-Provost 62 Travis M. Seegmiller 25 Joel K. Briscoe 63 Adam Robertson 26 Angela Romero 64 Norman K. Thurston 27 Brady Brammer 65 Francis D. Gibson 28 Brian S. King 66 Jefferson S. Burton 29 Matthew Gwynn 67 Douglas R. Welton 30 Mike Winder 68 Merrill F. Nelson 31 Elizabeth Weight 69 Christine F.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Legislative Scorecard 2019
    Legislative Scorecard 2 0 1 9 G e n e r a l S e s s i o n SENATORS DISTRICT H.B. 136 H.B. 166 H.B. 71 S.B. 96 SCORE (Against) (Against) (For) (Against) Senator Luz Escamilla Senate Dist. 1 Nay Nay Yea Nay 100% Senator Derek Kitchen Senate Dist. 2 Nay Nay Yea Nay 100% Senator Gene Davis Senate Dist. 3 Nay Nay Yea Nay 100% Senator Jani Iwamoto Senate Dist. 4 Nay Nay Yea Nay 100% Senator Karen Mayne Senate Dist. 5 Nay Nay Yea Nay 100% Senator Wayne Harper Senate Dist. 6 Yea Yea Yea Yea 25% Senator Deidre Henderson Senate Dist. 7 Yea Yea Yea Yea 25% Senator Kathleen Riebe Senate Dist. 8 Nay Nay Yea Nay 100% Senator Kirk Cullimore Senate Dist. 9 Yea Yea Yea Yea 25% Senator Lincoln Fillmore Senate Dist. 10 Yea Yea Yea Yea 25% Senator Daniel McCay Senate Dist. 11 Yea Yea Yea Yea 25% Vote For Reproductive Freedom Vote Against Reproductive Freedom Absent Votes Not Counted (Neutral) SENATORS DISTRICT H.B. 136 H.B. 166 H.B. 71 S.B. 96 SCORE (Against) (Against) (For) (Against) Senator Daniel Thatcher Senate Dist. 12 Yea Yea Yea Yea 25% Senator Jacob Anderegg Senate Dist. 13 Yea Absent Yea Yea 33% Senator Daniel Hemmert Senate Dist. 14 Yea Yea Absent Yea 0% Senator Keith Grover Senate Dist. 15 Yea Yea Yea Yea 25% Senator Curtis Bramble Senate Dist. 16 Yea Yea Yea Yea 25% Senator Scott Sandall Senate Dist. 17 Yea Yea Yea Yea 25% Senator Ann Millner Senate Dist.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Grassroots
    2020 Legislative Report GrassRoots Committed to Promoting the Principles of Limited Government, Constitution, Representative Government, Participatory Republic, Free Market Economy, Family, and Separation of Powers UtahGrassRoots.org Annual Report on Utah’s Legislature April 2020 The Citizens Strike Back Seegmiller Receives Top Overall Score, In December during a special session, the Utah Legislature Fillmore and McCay Lead Senate passed comprehensive tax reform which many felt would raise overall taxes. Shortly after passage of the bill a House Summary: Travis Seegmiller (R-WA), Cory citizens’ referendum to repeal the bill began. Citizens from Maloy (R-UT), Marc Roberts (R-UT), Mark Strong (R- throughout the state rose to sign the petition and were SL), Kim Coleman (R-SL), Stewart Barlow (R-DA) and successful. To save face, the legislature almost Kevin Stratton (R-UT) were in the top 10% of the House. unanimously repealed this measure. cay Senate Summary: Lincoln Fillmore (R-SL) and Dan This demonstrates the power citizens have in this state McCay (R-SL) received the top scores in the Senate. when they become involved. We would encourage readers to read through these bills and provide feedback (both Governor: Governor Herbert received a 28% compared good and bad to your representative) to your to his lifetime average of 41%. Herbert’s previous scores representatives. Informed citizen involvement is a good were: 71% (2010); 73% (2011); 75% (2012); 28% (2013); thing. 29% (2014); 41% (2015), 24% (2016), 27% (2017), 21% (2018), 40% (2019) While licking their wounds from the tax battle, legislators did successfully fight efforts on red-flag laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Policy Committee
    Legislative Policy Committee November 16, 2020 LPC Agenda 1. Adoption of minutes 2. 2020 ULCT Issue Tiers 3. COVID-19 4. Housing 5. Land Use Task Force update 6. Fees 7. Public safety update 8. Homework ULCT Policy Tiers *external litigation or task force Policy Tiers Green: update to tier Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Water conservation Land Use Task Force: Sales tax study Rainy day funds -PID -Annexation/incorporation * Ripper clause amicus Gun preemption -Gravel pits -Low impact design -Development agreements CARES funding -Canal easements -Water provider review of plat State homeless coordinator/plan -Building permits/vesting -Impact fees -Boundary line adjustment -Land use training Trust in public safety Metro Townships Demolition waste Law enforcement retirement & retention -Officer discipline process -Training -Data collection EMS Plastic bags Fireworks Opioids Housing: Transportation utility fee Public safety privacy Prosecution issues -Building fees -Impact fees -ADU -Permitting & inspection authority CARES funding, 4th stimulus Legal notice/ print news Emergency authority, emergency -HRZ, other affordable housing tools quorums *Justice Courts CRA/RDA Marijuana, tobacco COVID-19 COVID-19 Executive Order • Nov. 9-Nov. 23 (for now) • Masks, social distancing, no casual gatherings • Requirements on business with potential fine • No social gathering, with potential fine for organizer • Record number of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths • Impact on health care professionals • Next scheduled town hall: Mon., Dec. 7 at 3:00 pm VALUE PILLARS General Session Reach out to your legislator NOW! • New incumbents: meet them, help them, educate them • Replaced: 22 of 54 legislators who stood by ULCT and voted against HB 172 (2018) (creating a legislative committee to oversee political subdivisions) • Likely replaced: 3 of 11 members of the Political Subdivisions Committee Freshmen Class: Utah Legislature Open/Changed Seats city ally too close to call District County(ies) Vacating legislator Republican & Democrat candidates 7 Utah Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Legislative Session Report
    UTTAAHHPHYSICIAAPRILN | MAY 2021 2021 LEGISLATIVE SESSION REPORTpage 6 PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT WHEN IT COMES TO HEALTHCARE PROVIDER WELLNESS BILLS - IN A NUTSHELL INVESTING, IS BIGGER, BETTER? IN THE TIME OF COVID & BEYOND page 18 page 20 page 24 utahmed.org Trust the specialists. Helping physicians reach their financial goals since 1993. Entrust your financial goals to an organization dedicated to physicians. At UMAFS, we understand the unique circumstances of school loans, insurance needs, career changes, family and retirement goals. Take your financial needs to the specialists. Call us for a no-cost financial analysis today. CALL 801-747-0800 OR VISIT ONLINE AT UMAFS.ORG Trust the UTTAAHHPPHYHYSICSICIAIANN specialists. Utah Medical Association’s Bulletin is published 6 times per year for members of the UMA. All advertising, articles Helping physicians and editorials represent the views of the advertisers/ authors and do not reach their financial necessarily reflect the official policy of the goals since 1993. UMA. Copyright 2021. Editorial Board Entrust your financial goals Wallace Akerley, III, MD to an organization dedicated Brian J. Moench, MD Karen M. Radley, MD to physicians. At UMAFS, Daniel R. Faber, MD Carissa S. Monroy, MD we understand the unique circumstances of school loans, Staff Chief Executive Officer insurance needs, career Michelle S. McOmber, MBA, CAE changes, family and retirement Features Managing Editor & goals. Take your financial V.P. of Communications Mark Fotheringham needs to the specialists. 6 2021 Legislative Session Report Editorial Office Call us for a no-cost financial By Mark Brinton, JD – UMA General Counsel and Director of Government Affairs and Utah Medical Association analysis today.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Grassroots
    2018 Legislative Report GrassRoots Committed to Promoting the Principles of Limited Government, Constitution, Representative Government, Participatory Republic, Free Market Economy, Family, and Separation of Powers UtahGrassRoots.org Annual Report on Utah’s Legislature April 2018 Where have all the good bills gone? Roberts Tops House; Dayton Leads Senate Prospects for a tax cut were quickly dashed, despite having Marc Roberts received a perfect score on this year’s $382 million in ongoing revenues and one-time GrassRoots report. Rounding out the top 10% in the House increase of $102 million, the Utah Legislature chose were Brian Greene (R-UT), Ken Ivory (R-SL), Travis to continue the trend of raising taxes. If HJR 20 is Seegmiller (R-WA), Adam Robertson (R-UT), Norman passed Utah drivers will see a 33% increase in their Thurston (R-UT) and Kim Coleman (R-SL). gasoline tax. Another bill, HB 293, is projected to cause property tax revenue to the state increase by Senate Summary: Margaret Dayton (R-UT) received the $125 million by H.B. 293. top score in the Senate. Increased revenue will be spent on changing the name of Governor: Governor Herbert received a 21% compared Utah Transit Authority which lawmakers are hoping to his lifetime average of 41%. Herbert’s previous scores Utah’s citizens will forget the years of misuse of taxpayer were: 71% (2010); 73% (2011); 75% (2012); 28% (2013); dollars. While the bill has some good provisions as the old 29% (2014); 41% (2015), 24% (2016), 27% (2017). saying goes, “You can put lipstick on a pig but it’s still a pig.” Averages: The House received an average score of 46% which is equal to the Representatives lifetime score.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210218.TAC Meeting Agenda.Pdf
    JORDAN RIVER COMMISSION Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Thursday, February 18, 2021 | 2:00 - 3:30 PM Due to impacts of the COVID-19 global pandemic, and state and local guidelines that presently discourage mass gatherings, this meeting will be conducted entirely online using a virtual meeting platform, without an anchor location, as provided in the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, Utah Code 54-2-207(4). Committee members, guests, visitors and other participants may join the meeting using the access information provided below. For Full Video Conference: Using a Web Browser https://us02web.zoom.us/j/8015364158?pwd=NmtpSjJPVjBQcEdjMnlsbjlyVjRxdz09 Using the Zoom App – Meeting ID: 801 536 4158 Passcode: JRC-2021 For Audio Only: One tap mobile – 669-900-9128,,8015364158#,,,,*70059013# Or Dial (669) 900 9128 – Meeting ID: 801 536 4158 Passcode: 70059013# Note: participants not identified by name by the system software will be asked to identify themselves for purposes of the meeting record. MEETING AGENDA 1. Welcome & Introductions 2:00 PM a) Information and instructions for online meeting recording and participation b) Identification of meeting participants for recording 2. Public Comments This is an opportunity for comments from the general public regarding any item on the agenda, or any other matters related to the Jordan River Commission and the TAC. Individual comments are limited to 2 minutes, and all comments are limited to 10 minutes total. Comments can also be sent by email to [email protected] (include subject line “TAC Meeting Comments”). 3. Administrative Matters a) Utah Open & Public Meeting Training b) Adopt minutes from the Thursday, January 21, 2021, TAC meeting 4.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT the YOUNG AMERICAN VOTER Michael J. Pomante II, Ph.D
    ABSTRACT THE YOUNG AMERICAN VOTER Michael J. Pomante II, Ph.D. Department of Political Science Northern Illinois University, 2016 Scot Schraufnagel, Director Since Converse’s work in 1971, political scientists have noted the abysmal level of participation by young Americans on Election Day. One possible reason for the negative comments by academics is their assumption that young people will react to socio-political and economic contexts in the same manner as other segments of the voting population. A second possible explanation for the negative reports is that not all relevant variables, which explain deviation in youth mobilization levels, have been uncovered. The research reported herein explores potential American voters between the ages of 18 to 24 with an eye toward uncovering unique explanations for their lower levels of mobilization and possible new variables that others have failed to consider. Specifically, the research demonstrates three ways in which younger voters are different from the voting population 25 years of age and older. For instance, it is widely recognized that economic hardship can influence democratic participation rates, this research uncovers evidence to suggest a traditional definition of unemployment is not the best measure for capturing the “economic hardship” of young Americans. With a new measure of unemployment, which includes discouraged workers and the underemployed, I learn that the youngest age group is mobilized to vote. Older individuals, on the other hand, continue to associate with lower participation rates when economic hardship is higher. Second, the research uncovers the overall detrimental effects of state laws which raise the relative costs of voting. The research develops a wholly new Cost of Voting Index (COVI) to capture these effects.
    [Show full text]