DOCSLIB.ORG

Did You Know?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Did You Know? You’ve heard about Proposition 2, but DID YOU KNOW? A Washington DC lobbying organization (Marijuana Policy Project) representing the marijuana industry (big growers and distributors), whose stated purpose is to legalize recreational marijuana, is the primary backer of Utah’s petition, spending millions to change laws in Utah and two other states in 2018. It’s about MONEY. CHILDREN • The only penalty for those who possess • Children and teens could obtain without a medical card is an infraction and 9 permission to use a very high potency a maximum $100 fine. THC marijuana.1 • Until July 2020, even without a medical • Utah law already allows children with marijuana card, a person claiming a intractable seizures to seek treatment by “qualifying condition” can use, possess or physicians using CBD oil2 or prescription manufacture marijuana products under the Epidiolex3 to help reduce seizures. initiative’s affirmative defense provision if they are charged.10 • The highest youth marijuana use in the country is in states that have legalized • Qualifying conditions are so broad (e.g., marijuana, even for medical purposes and chronic pain, nausea, autism) as to allow use is increasing.4 nearly anyone to qualify for a recommendation.11 LACK OF REGULATION NO Rx, NO PHARMACIES • Local city and county officials will be unable to prevent marijuana growing • No pharmacists and pharmacies - people warehouses or dispensaries from operating without medical training (“budtenders”) in your community except within 300 ft. will sell marijuana products (including of residential neighborhoods and 600 ft of THC) through marijuana dispensaries in 12 churches, schools and parks.5 your community. • There will be no limits on the potency of • Practitioners without any training in the marijuana products, including virtually use of marijuana will be recommending pure forms of THC – which produces the marijuana products. They can’t write a “high” and alters mood & consciousness.6 prescription since it is illegal! There is no requirement to disclose side effects.13 • Smoking is allowed if the joint is lit below 750℉ without an open flame.7 Marijuana • Patients get whatever product the burns at 495℉ and can be ignited without budtender gives them (“medical” strains 14 a flame (stove, car lighter, etc.). are often identical to recreational). IMMUNITY or PUNY PENALTIES FEW LIMITS • The petition grants immunity to doctors • Utah users will be able to possess ¼ lb. of and others who recommend marijuana, marijuana in public (equivalent to 160 – 15 meaning they are immune to malpractice 220 joints). No limit for possession in lawsuits and even administrative sanctions the residence. from state licensing boards.8 • The vaping of concentrated marijuana • Unethical practitioners (yes, they exist) will be permitted, a preferred method for 16 could recommend marijuana for any recreational use. reason, to any person, without any penalty.7 • Some Utah residents will be allowed to • The initiative will cost the state about $2.9 grow up to six marijuana plants at home, million ($1.8M ongoing and $1.1M one- each capable of yielding as much as 2 lbs. time). Fees will only cover about $1.4M.18 OTHER • Dispensaries will pay NO SALES TAX!19 • Marijuana grown and sold in Utah, still It is an all cash business. constitute federal felonies.17 Anyone who • The petition effectively decriminalizes participates in these activities commits the growing, selling and use of felonies, whether charged or not. marijuana in Utah. Is this what you understood as Proposition 2? “This initiative ... has significant flaws. It lacks important safeguards regarding its production and utilization and would potentially open the door to recreational use…I will actively oppose the medical cannabis initiative.” -Utah Governor Gary Herbert “We commend the Utah Medical Association for its statement…cautioning that the proposed Utah marijuana initiative would compromise the health and safety of Utah communities. We respect the wise counsel of the medical doctors of Utah. The public interest is best served when all new drugs designed to relieve suffering and illness and the procedures by which they are made available to the public undergo the scrutiny of medical scientists and official approval bodies." -The First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Organizations Opposed to Prop 2 Others Opposed to Prop 2 Utah Medical Association Governor Gary Herbert American College of Emergency Physicians, Lt. Governor Spencer Cox Utah Chapter Rob Bishop, United States Congressman Utah Psychiatric Association Chris Stewart, United States Congressman Utah Society of Anesthesiologists Wayne Niederhauser, President, Utah Senate Utah Hospital Association Greg Hughes, Speaker of the Utah House Citizens for Strong Families Stuart Adams, Majority Whip, Utah Senate Family First Foundation Brad Wilson, Majority Leader Utah House Family Policy Resource Karen Hale, Former Utah Senator Fraternal Order of Police Jake Anderegg, Utah Senator Islamic Society of Greater Salt Lake Curt & Susan Bramble, Utah Senator Latinos in Action Allen Christensen, Utah Senator Meridian Magazine Wayne Harper, Utah Senator Newquist Group Lyle Hillyard, Utah Senator Salt Lake Chamber of Commerce David Hinkins, Utah Senator Salt Lake City Police Association Don Ipson, Utah Senator Sutherland Institute Peter Knudsen, Utah Senator The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Ann Milner, Utah Senator Saints Ralph Okerlund, Utah Senator Utah Eagle Forum Jerry Stevenson, Utah Senator Utah Episcopal Diocese Kevin Van Tassell, Utah Senator Utah Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Evan Vickers, Utah Senator Utah Narcotics Officers Association Cheryl Acton, Utah Representative Utah PTA Stuart Barlow, MD, Utah Representative Utah Sheriffs' Association Walt Brooks, Utah Representative Bishop Scott Hayashi, Episcopal Diocese LaVar Christensen, Utah Representative Steve Starks, Pres-elect, Salt Lake Chamber Kay Christofferson, Utah Representative Scott Anderson, President and CEO, Zions Bank Tim Hawkes, Utah Representative Gail Miller, LHM Group of Companies Ken Ivory, Utah Representative Karen Huntsman Karianne Lisonbee, Utah Representative David Huntsman, Pres., Huntsman Foundation Cory Maloy, Utah Representative Mike Leavitt, Former Governor, Sec. of HHS Mike McKell, Utah Representative Mitt Romney, U.S. Senate Candidate Kelly Miles, Utah Representative Jim Jardine, Lawyer, Education Leader Merrill Nelson, Utah Representative Kem Gardner, Chairman, Gardner Company Mike Noel, Utah Representative Rosie Rivera, Salt Lake County Sheriff Darrin Owens, Utah Representative Spencer P. Eccles, Former Exec. Dir. Governor’s Lee Perry, Utah Representative Office of Economic Development Jeremy Peterson, Utah Representative Carlton Christensen, Former SLC Councilman Val Potter, Utah Representative Aimee Winder Newton, Chair Salt Lake County Susan Pulsipher, Utah Representative Council Tim Quinn, Utah Representative Derek Miller, President and CEO, Salt Lake Adam Robertson, Utah Representative Chamber of Commerce Travis M. Seegmiller, Utah Representative Dave Mallinak, Pastor, Berean Baptism Church Lowry Snow, Utah Representative Rev. Gregory Johnson, Pres., Standing Together Kevin Stratton, Utah Representative Kim R. Wilson, Attorney Norm Thurston, Utah Representative Walt Plumb, Developer, Philanthropist Logan Wilde, Utah Representative Mike Kennedy, MD Mayor Jon Pike Jennifer Brown, DDS, Dentist Adam Taintor, MD Ed Kennedy, President, Truth about Prop. 2 Enedina Stanger, Patient Representative Nathan Evershed, Candidate, County Attorney Nathan Frodsham, Patient Representative Christy Kane, CMHC Todd Moon, Patient Representative Jenet and Michael Erickson Aaron Kennard, Utah Sheriffs’ Association John Haynes DeAnn Kettenring, Utah PTA JoAnn Petrie 1 The Utah Medical Cannabis Act initiative, section 104; section 5 (page 2), enacting Utah Code 4-41b- 39 (page 14), enacting Utah Code 26-60b-201(2)(b). 201(2)(a); section 43 (page 17), enacting Utah Code 26- 60b-301(2)(a). 2 Senate Bill 130, “Cannabidiol Product Act,” 2018 General Session, Utah Legislature. 6 Throughout the initiative, CBD and THC are treated https://le.utah.gov/~2018/bills/static/sb0130.html generically and equally: Initiative, section 20 (page 7) enacting Utah Code 4-41b-602 (1)(b); section 22 (page 8) 3 FDA approves first drug comprised of marijuana enacting Utah Code 4-41-701 (1)(a); section 42 (page 16) ingredient to treat rare, severe forms of epilepsy. enacting Utah Code 26-606-204 (1)(c); section 51 (page https://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressann 20) enacting Utah Code 26-606-502 (3)(b). ouncements/ucm611046.htm 7 4 Initiative, section 60 (pages 23 – 24), enacting Utah Code SAMSHA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics 58-37-3.6b(4). & Quality, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2015 and 2016. Past Month Marijuana Use by Age 8 Initiative, section 36 (page 13) enacting Utah Code 26- Group and State https://learnaboutsam.org/wp- 60b-108. content/uploads/2016/11/SAM-report-on-CO-and-WA-issued-31- 9 Oct-2016.pdf Initiative, section 42 (pages 16-17), enacting Utah Code 26-60b-204(5). 5 The Utah Medical Cannabis Act initiative, section 10 16 (page 7), enacting Utah Code 4-41b-405; section Initiative, section 61 (page 24), enacting Utah Code 58- 55, (page 21), enacting Utah Code 26-60b-506; 37-3.7. section 4 (page 2), enacting Utah Code 4-41b-104; section 32 (page 12), enacting Utah Code 26-60b- 15 Initiative, section 42 (page 16), enacting Utah Code 26- 11 Initiative, section 39
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Newsletter02.Pdf
    Fall 2002 sion at the University. A committee has Now I am sounding like a politician get- From the Director been formed. Could the Institute become ting ready to run for re-election. But I am a center for policy work? Should it seek so proud of what we have done, and of the expansion? How about new programs? great work of our staff, that I just want to These are just some of the questions the crow a little. Please excuse me. And I am committee will explore. After thirty-seven not running again! years of excellence, “If it ain’t broke, don’t I still need to work. I’m looking for fix it,” must apply. But it is also timely to some consulting opportunities. I would look to the future. like to hang out here through some teach- I often contemplate the wonderful char- ing. I will aid the new director as coal sketch of our founder Robert H. requested. The Hinckley Institute of Hinckley by Alvin Gittins that warms my Politics and the University of Utah will office. The eyes focus on the future. The remain a big part of my life. face is filled with compassion yet reflects a But there are mountains to climb- no-non-sense attitude. Par-ti-ci-pa-tion - as motorcycles to rev-grandchildren to hug- Mr. Hinckley said it while emphasizing and “many a mile before I sleep.” every syllable - is what we are about. And participation is what my staff and I have sought to deliver. I will miss my second family.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the Legislative Auditor General
    OSTATEff OFi UTceAH of the Legislative Auditor General 315 HOUSE BUILDING • PO BOX 145315 • SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5315 (801) 538-1033 • FAX (801) 538-1063 Audit Subcommittee of the Legislative Management Committee President Wayne L. Niederhauser, Co–Chair • Speaker Greg Hughes, Co–Chair JOHN M. SCHAFF, CIA Senator Gene Davis • Representative Brian S. King AUDITOR GENERAL February 3, 2016 Senator David Hinkins, Chair Representative Ken Ivory, Chair Public Utilities and Technology Interim Committee Utah State Capitol Complex Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Senator Hinkins and Representative Ivory: Enclosed are copies of the legislative audit report #2016-02, A Review of the Administration of 911 Surcharges. In accordance with Utah Code 36-12-8, the Legislative Audit Subcommittee passed a motion referring this audit report to your committee for further review and action as appropriate. The audit report was also referred to Executive Offices and Criminal Justice Appropriations Subcommittee, but your committee is designated as the lead committee, so we would like a response from you. The Legislative Auditor General and staff have done extensive work and used valuable resources to perform the audit in a professional and thorough manner. The best response from your committee will be to arrive at some conclusion on the issues raised and recommendations made in the report. Therefore, for each recommendation to the Legislature we ask that your committee reach one of the following conclusions, or some combination of the three, by a motion and a vote: · Draft legislation for the upcoming 2016 Legislative General Session for those issues you find to be sufficiently important · Conclude that the issues are significant but that more time is needed to develop solutions and consensus · Conclude that there is insufficient committee support to study the issues further In addition, for other (non-legislative) recommendations we ask that as part of your oversight role you determine whether appropriate action is being taken to address the audit findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah's Official Voter Information Pamphlet
    UTAH’S OFFICIAL VOTER INFORMATION PAMPHLET 2018 GENERAL ELECTION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6TH NOTE: This electronic version of the voter information pamphlet contains general voting information for all Utah voters. To view voting information that is specific to you, visit VOTE.UTAH.GOV, enter your address, and click on “Sample Ballot, Profiles, Issues.” For audio & braille versions of the voter information pamphlet, please visit blindlibrary.utah.gov. STATE OF UTAH OFFICE OF THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR SPENCER J. COX LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Dear Utah Voter, My office is pleased to present the 2018 Voter Information Pamphlet. Please take the time to read through the material to learn more about the upcoming General Election on November 6, 2018. Inside you will find information about candidates, ballot questions, judges, and how to vote. In addition to this pamphlet, you can visit VOTE.UTAH.GOV to find even more information about the election. At VOTE.UTAH.GOV you can view your sample ballot, find your polling location, and view biographies for the candidates in your area. If you need assistance of any kind, please call us at 1-800-995-VOTE, email [email protected], or stop by our office in the State Capitol building. Thank you for doing your part to move our democracy forward. Sincerely, Spencer J. Cox Lieutenant Governor WHAT’S IN THIS PAMPHLET? 1. WHO ARE THE CANDIDATES? 2 U.S. Senate 3 U.S. House of Representatives 5 Utah State Legislature 9 Utah State Board of Education 28 2. WHAT ARE THE QUESTIONS ON MY BALLOT? 30 Constitutional Amendment A 32 Constitutional Amendment B 35 Constitutional Amendment C 39 Nonbinding Opinion Question Number 1 44 Proposition Number 2 45 Proposition Number 3 66 Proposition Number 4 74 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution on Common Core State Standards and Assessments
    Resolution on Common Core State Standards and Assessments WHEREAS, The Common Core State Standards Initiative (“Common Core”), also known as “Utah’s Core,”1 is not a Utah state standards initiative, but rather a set of inferior nationally-based standards and tests developed through a collaboration between two NGO’s (non-governmental organizations) and unelected boards and consortia from outside the state of Utah;2 and, WHEREAS, Common Core was financed with private foundation funds,3 replacing the influence of our votes with wealth and influence to bypass our state legislature and impose control over Utah’s education standards and tests;4 and, WHEREAS, Common Core binds us to an established copyright over standards, from which we cannot subtract, replace or add to - beyond an additional 15%;5 and, WHEREAS, the General Educational Provisions Act 6 prohibits federal authority over curriculum and testing, yet the U.S. Department of Education’s “Cooperative Agreements”7 confirm8 Common Core’s test-building 9and data collection10 is federally managed;11 and, WHEREAS, “student behavior indicators”12 - which include testing13 for mental health, social and cultural (i.e. religious) habits and attitudes14 and family status - are now being used for Common Core tests and assessments; and, WHEREAS, Common Core violates Utah15 state and federal privacy laws16 by requiring the storage and sharing17 of private18 student19 and family data without consent;20 using a pre- school through post-graduate (P-20) tracking system and a federally- funded State
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Legislative Wrap up Document
    UTAH LEAGUE OF CITIES AND TOWNS LEGISLATIVE2021 WRAP UP #Cities Work INTRODUCTION 2021 was a legislative session like no other: new Governor, new legislators, COVID-19, Zoom voting, and an earlier start date after several 2020 special sessions. ULCT successfully nav- igated the 2021 General Session by relying on the League’s pillars: respecting the roles of state and local government, collaborating with stake- holders, and targeting policy-focused outcomes. ULCT took a hands-on approach with over 60 bills—testifying, negoti- ating, writing language, 245 and other advocacy BILLS TRACKED work—in addition to the INTRODUCTION 245 bills we tracked. Despite many bills preempt- ing local government authority, ULCT effectively defeated legislation mandating digital billboards, expanding short-term rentals, and increasing bureaucracy around fees, to name a few. ULCT invested significant resources negotiating and amending two preemptive land use bills, and will continue discussions with legislators on inspec- tions, building design elements, and internal ac- cessory dwelling units. Several bills supporting and improving law enforcement were passed due to the efforts of the Love, Listen, Lead Task Force, a joint ULCT and Utah Chiefs of Police Association endeavor. The Legislature also passed an unprec- edented investment in transit and transportation projects, efforts supported by the ULCT Board. Ultimately, our success comes back to the unpar- alleled involvement by our members. Thank you! Of course, the session also created plenty of is- sues for the 2021 interim, including continuing discussions on water, land use, public safety, and much more. We encourage members to engage with the League through the Legislative Policy Committee, ULCT conferences, and League com- munications.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Legislative Wrap Up
    Utah League of Cities and Towns 2014 General Legislative Session Wrap Up Wrap General Legislative 2014 1 ULCT Legislative Team Session Kenneth H. Bullock, Executive Director [email protected] Ken has worked for ULCT for 29 years and is responsible for the overall management of League operations and activities. He works closely with the ULCT Board of Directors, represents ULCT on various committees and boards, and communicates regularly with government officials, business leaders, and the public. Lincoln Shurtz, Director of Legislative Affairs [email protected] Lincoln has worked for ULCT for 15 years and coordinates ULCT policy outreach, administers the Legislative Policy Committee, & presents findings to state administrative and legislative branches. He specializes in the Utah state budget, transportation, economic development, and retirement issues. Jodi Hoffman, Land Use Analyst [email protected] Jodi has worked for ULCT for 11 years and for municipal government for over 25 years. She specializes in municipal land use and water issues. Roger Tew, Senior Policy Analyst [email protected] Roger has worked for ULCT for 18 years and within the state government structure for 35 years. He specializes in public utilities, judicial issues, tax policy, and telecommunications policy. Cameron Diehl, Policy Analyst/Attorney [email protected] Cameron has worked for ULCT for 6 years and coordinates LPC correspondence and organization. He specializes in federal relations, environmental policy, election law, and every other conceivable political issue. Nick Jarvis, Research Analyst [email protected] Nick has been with ULCT for 4 years and oversees the budget database and other research. Satin Tashnizi Legislative Intern [email protected] Satin was ULCT’s intern during the session and managed our logistics and sanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Policy Committee
    Legislative Policy Committee December 14, 2020 Agenda 1. Legislative logistics 2. Housing 3. Public safety 4. Fees 5. Other legislation 6. Outreach 7. Homework 8. Recognition of Governor Herbert Legislative Outlook Unprecedented 2021 session! VALUE PILLARS Policy Tiers Green: update to tier Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Water conservation Land Use Task Force: Land Use Task Force: Rainy day funds -PID -Annexation/incorporation Housing: -Annexation/incorporation -Low impact development Gun preemption -Building fees -Gravel pits -Development agreements -Impact fees -Low impact development -Water provider review of plat State homeless coordinator/plan -ADU -Development agreements -Building permits/vesting -Permitting & inspection authority -Water provider review of plat -Impact fees Anonymous code complaints -HRZ, other affordable housing tools -Building permits/vesting -Boundary line adjustment -Impact fees -Land use training Eminent domain Trust in public safety: -Boundary line adjustment -Officer discipline process -Land use training Convention and tourism Enterprise funds -Training assessment -Data collection Transportation/Air quality Emergency authority ULCT will engage on bills that impact trust & ULCT prism GIA and notice of claim Rainy day funds Marijuana, tobacco (land use, licensing) Municipal fees and taxes (in general) State homeless coordinator/plan Gun preemption Economic development/incentives Fireworks Metro Townships JRI investment CRA/RDA (Sen. Harper) Public safety individual privacy EMS Legal notice/print news Transportation utility
    [Show full text]
  • CCM Minutes 12/2/17
    Utah County Central Committee Meeting December 2, 2017, 9:00 AM Willowcreek M.S. Minutes Call to Order: UCRP Chairman Rob Craig ​ Prayer: Mark Barlow (PC, AF13) ​ Pledge: Keri Guinn (EO, LD59) ​ Recognition of Elected Officials House Representatives:Kay Christofferson, Brad Daw, Francis Gibson, Brian Greene, Michael Kennedy, Cory Maloy, Michael McKell, Jefferson Moss, Val Peterson, Marc Roberts, Dean Sanpei, Keven Stratton, and Norm Thurston. Senators: Jacob Anderegg and Deidre Henderson. Auditor: John Dougall. Congresswoman Mia Love (CD4). Congressman John Curtis (CD3) Approval of Minutes from September 23, 2017. Minutes approved without objection. ​ Recognition of Allied Organizations College Republicans Young Republicans Utah County Republican Women Comments from UTGOP Chairman: Rob Anderson UTGOP Fundraising efforts successful (E.C. Christmas fundraiser and Trump visit fundraiser). Caucus Committee Chair appointed (Dana Dickson). UTGOP Partnership with Qualtrics. Officer Reports Chairman Rob Craig Ratification of Standing Committee Elections -Motion to ratify C&B nominees: Joey Smith, Chair, and Karen Daniels, Vice Chair. ​ Ayes had it and the nominees were ratified. Bylaw Proposal was duly noticed in the meeting. Support for Convention Nominee Bylaw 5(C) (Changes are in bold, text to be added underlined) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ C. County Party Officers - All county level Party officers including the County Chair, Vice Chair, Treasurer, Secretary; and the five Appointed Officers; must show pre-convention and primary neutrality toward Republican
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Legislative Scorecard
    12 March 2015 Utah Taxpayers Association - 2015 Legislative Scorecard The Utah Taxpayers Association annually releases a legislative scorecard ranking Utah’s legislators by their votes on the most important tax-related bills considered during the most recent legislative session. Out of 128 bills the Utah Taxpayers Association tracked during the 2015 legislature, twelve of the most important tax-related bills were used in rating Utah’s 104 legislators. In the House, four bills supported by the Taxpayers Association received no dissenting votes, therefore, the lowest possible score for a Representative (unless there were absences) is 36%. In the Senate, seven bills supported by the Taxpayers Association passed without a dissenting vote, meaning the lowest possible Senator score (unless there were absences) is 70%. Senate Summary House Summary The average score in the Senate is 81.4%. The average score in the House is 78.8%. Ten Three Senators received a perfect 100% score: Representatives received a perfect 100% Margaret Dayton, Deidre Henderson, and Scott score: Norm Thurston, Dan McCay, Mike Jenkins. The next highest scoring senators are Kennedy, Fred Cox, Marc Roberts, Jon David Hinkins and Howard Stephenson with Stanard, Dean Sanpei, Justin Fawson, Jim 90%. The highest scoring Democrat is Karen Dunnigan, and Eric Hutchings. The Highest Mayne (80.0%). scoring Democrats are Susan Duckworth, Sandra Hollins, and Brad King, all scoring No senators scored below 62%. The lowest 81.8%. scoring Republicans are Peter Knudson (70.0%) and Stuart Adams (71.4%). The lowest The lowest scoring Republicans are Kay McIff scoring Democrat is Jim Dabakis (62.5%).
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Utah Taxpayers Association Legislative Scorecard
    2009 Utah Taxpayers Association Legislative Scorecard The Utah Taxpayers Association annually issues legislative report cards to its members and the public. The 2009 scorecard rates Utah’s 104 legislators on 17 key tax and spending related bills in the House and 16 in the Senate. Because HJR 8 is such an important taxpayer issue, we have applied a double weight to that vote. In the House, six of the bills were supported by the Association and passed without a dissenting vote, meaning the lowest possible House score (unless there were absences) on this year’s scorecard was 33.3%. In the Senate, seven of the votes were supported by the Association and passed without a dissenting vote, meaning the lowest possible Senate score (unless there were absences) on this year’s scorecard was 41.1%. House Summary The average score in the House is 72.6%. Four Representatives, all Republicans, scored 100.0%: Rebecca Lockhart, John Dougall and Mike Morley. Janice Fisher and David Litvack were the highest scoring Democrats (58.8%). The Representatives scoring below 50% are Jackie Biskupski (35.3%), Christine Johnson (37.4%), Neil Hansen (37.5%), Larry Wiley (40.0%), Mark Wheatley (41.2%), Christine Watkins (41.2%), James Gowans (41.2%), Rebecca Chavez-Houck (41.2%), Laura Black (41.2%), Jennifer Seelig (43.8%), Jay Seegmiller (47.1%), Marie Poulson (47.1%), Carol Spackman Moss (47.1%), Lynn Hemingway (47.1%), and Susan Duckworth (47.1%). The Representatives scoring below 50% are Democrats. Jim Bird (52.9%) was the lowest scoring Republican. Other low scoring Republicans include Kay McIff (64.7%), Fred Hunsaker (64.7%), Rebecca Edwards (68.8%) and Sheryl Allen (68.8%).
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Conservation Community Legislative Update
    UTAH CONSERVATION COMMUNITY LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 2020 General Legislative Session Issue #5 March 1, 2020 Welcome to the 2020 Legislative Update issue will prepare you to call, email or tweet your legislators This issue includes highlights of week five, what we can with your opinions and concerns! expect in the week ahead, and information for protecting wildlife and the environment. Please direct any questions or ACTION ALERT! comments to Steve Erickson: [email protected]. The Inland Port Modifications bill - HB 347 (Rep. About the Legislative Update Gibson), is now awaiting action on the House floor, The Legislative Update is made possible by the Utah probably Monday but early in the week for sure. We’re Audubon Council and contributing organizations. Each working to get it amended as it moves forward, but it Update provides bill and budget item descriptions and will remain a bill for a project and process we can’t support. status updates throughout the Session, as well as important Session dates and key committees. For the most up-to-date Oppose HB 347! information and the names and contact information for all legislators, check the Legislature’s website at HB 233, the Depleted Uranium-funded Natural Resources Legacy Fund, will be debated and voted on in the Senate www.le.utah.gov. The Legislative Update focuses on this week. Urge legislators to pass the Fund without the legislative information pertaining to wildlife, sensitive and DE funding source- and avoid making this their legacy! invasive species, public lands, state parks, SITLA land management, energy development, renewable energy and Lastly, contact your legislators to urge them to fund bills and budgets to Clear the Air! conservation, and water issues.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2017 Newsletter
    1 April 2017 Volume 42 Issue 4 THE UTAH TAXPAYER A Publication of the Utah Taxpayers Association If Congress Acts, What Will APRIL 2017 Volume 42 Federal Tax Reform Look Like? With Congress’s failure to repeal and replace the Affordable If Congress Acts, What Will Care Act, attention in Washington, D.C. appears to be turning Federal Tax Reform Look towards federal tax reform. This is a needed change as the Like? Page 1 United States has not seen any comprehensive tax reform since My Corner: Employed by 1986. The nation’s economy has evolved since the 1980’s and Page 2 Utah’s Tax Watchdog for 40 the tax code needs to be reformed to match the economic Years activity of today’s world. Page 2 Currently the federal tax code imposes high marginal rates on 2017 Legislative Session: A both businesses and individuals. According to the Washington, Page 4 D.C. based Tax Foundation, the United States has one of the Mixed Bag of Success, Tax Increases Page 5 highest corporate income tax rates in the world. Significant tax reform would be targeted at lowering those rates. The struggle 2017 Legislative Scorecard for the reform will be how to do it such that it best benefits the Released, 34 “Friend of the United States overall. Taxpayer” Awarded Page 7 The U.S. tax system is complex. The Tax Foundation has stated that individuals spent 8.9 billion hours complying with Utah’s Income Tax Rate the Internal Revenue Tax Code in 2016 and figures that the Ranks Second Highest total cost for tax compliance in 2016 was $409 billion.
    [Show full text]