The Euclid Bluestone of Northeastern Ohio: Quarrying History, Petrology, and Sedimentology Joseph T

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Euclid Bluestone of Northeastern Ohio: Quarrying History, Petrology, and Sedimentology Joseph T 70 INDIANA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OCCASIONAL PA P ER 67 The Euclid Bluestone of Northeastern Ohio: Quarrying History, Petrology, and Sedimentology Joseph T. Hannibal, Benjamin A. Scherzer, and David B. Saja The Cleveland Museum of Natural History Abstract Ohio. Euclid bluestone was also crushed for use as a com- ponent of concrete, but recently it has been used mainly for Euclid bluestone (the Euclid Member of the Upper De- riprap along the Lake Erie shore and along stream banks, and vonian Bedford Formation) is a dense, well-indurated, very as decorative landscape stone. fine grained sandstone that crops out in northeastern Ohio This paper provides a comprehensive review of the in and near Cleveland. The unit was quarried early in the quarrying history of the Euclid bluestone, documents the nineteenth century, even earlier than documented quarry- last producing quarry, and comments on the petrology and ing of the more famous bluestones of New York State. Eu- sedimentology of the unit on the basis of samples from this clid bluestone was most famous for its use as flagstone for quarry. Brief comparisons also are made to the classic blue- sidewalks. It was used extensively in the Cleveland area, and stones of New York and Pennsylvania. In this paper, the ini- was shipped outside of northeastern Ohio to towns and cit- tial letters of both parts of the name of formal rock units, for ies between Milwaukee and New York and southward as far instance, “Berea Sandstone,” are capitalized, but only the first as Washington, D.C. Most Euclid bluestone quarries were part of informal rock units, for instance, “Euclid bluestone,” closed in the first decades of the twentieth century because are capitalized. of the lessening demand for sidewalk stone. Only one quarry, located on the eastern edge of the Cuyahoga Valley in south- What is the Euclid Bluestone? ern Cuyahoga County, has produced stone in recent decades. The Euclid bluestone is a very fine grained sandstone The stone quarried there has been broken to produce blocks that crops out on the east side of Cleveland, and in areas east suitable for riprap and landscaping. The Euclid at this quarry and south of Cleveland, and is mainly exposed east of the is quartz-rich, with minor albite (±microcline), muscovite, Cuyahoga River. The Euclid crops out in several Cleveland chlorite (±biotite), and accessory minerals (zircon, apatite, area parks, including the Euclid Creek and Brecksville reser- and magnetite), all enclosed in a ferroan-dolomite matrix. vations of the Cleveland Metroparks, and along Doan Brook Euclid bluestone is a distal Catskill wedge deposit composed at the Cleveland/Cleveland Heights border. The lip of one of finer material than that of the more proximal New York of the largest waterfalls in Cuyahoga County, on Mill Creek and Pennsylvania bluestones. in southeast Cleveland, is composed of the Euclid bluestone. Introduction Prosser (in Morse and Foerste, 1909, p. 166; see also Prosser, 1912, p. 373) formally named the Euclid bluestone for Eu- Euclid bluestone is a very fine grained sandstone that clid Creek, where the unit is 26.25 ft (8 m) thick, and was has been quarried in northeastern Ohio for most of the last long quarried. two centuries. It is considered to be an informal unit by the The word “bluestone” refers to its reputed color. Mat- Ohio Geological Survey. The Euclid is the densest of the ma- thew Read (1879, p. 215), an early Ohio Geological Survey jor northeastern Ohio sandstones; it was known for its com- geologist, called it a blue quarry-rock. John Strong Newberry pact nature and strength (Bownocker, 1915, p. 69–70; Van (1873, p. 188), Ohio’s most prominent nineteenth-century Horn, 1931, p. 107–111). Euclid bluestone was especially geologist, noted that it was the “blue stone” of the Cleveland recommended for use as flagstone. The Euclid historically has market. George Merrill (1891, p. 278), the great nineteenth- been used for elegant sandstone sidewalks that once graced century building stone expert, called it a “deep blue-gray most of the streets of Cleveland and other northeastern Ohio color.” Prosser (1912, p. 367) described it as a bluish-gray cities (Hannibal and Palermo, 1980). Sidewalks in other cit- sandstone at its type locality, and Bownocker (1915, p. 68) ies and towns in the region between New York and Chicago called it a blue sandstone. However, only one of the samples were also paved with Euclid bluestone flagging (Bownocker, noted by Van Horn (1931, p. 108) was light bluish gray; an- 1915, p. 70). In addition, the Euclid bluestone was used for other was light yellow. The rock’s name is perhaps more col- exterior steps, foundations for homes and other structures, orful than the rock itself, as the stone has a bluish cast only tombstones, windowsills, capstones and other cut-stone when it is freshly exposed. To complicate things, the term building trim, fences, laundry tubs, and even billiard tables, “bluestone” has long been used for types of rock other than as well as for aggregate and crushed stone (Bownocker, 1915, sandstone. “Sandusky blue stone,” for example, is a limestone p. 70; Van Horn, 1931, p. 107–111; personal observations of (Bownocker, 1915, p. 61). Thus the name “bluestone” was, the authors). It has occasionally been used for exterior walls and remains, more of a commercial appellation than an accu- of buildings, including the old Euclid City Hall in Euclid, rate descriptive term (Dickinson, 1903, p. 5; Bowles, 1917, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 40TH FORUM ON THE GEOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL MINERALS 71 p. 94; Albanese and Kelly, 1991, p. 191). One of the best classic definitions of eastern U.S. bluestone is that of Berkey (1908, p. 156), reiterated by Bowles (1939, p. 97–101), who Euclid defined the stone as “an indurated arkose sandstone.” Creek The Ohio Geological Survey now considers the Euclid 7 bluestone to be an informal unit, as did Van Horn (1931), 81 45’ N 6 BLUESTONE 41 30’ W 5 but others have considered it to be the Euclid Member of 4 the Bedford Formation (for example, Pashin and Ettensohn, Cleveland 1995). It has also been called the Euclid sandstone lentil 3 (Morse and Foerste, 1909, p. 166); the Euclid lentil (Prosser, 1912, p. 373); the Euclid Siltstone Member (for example, de Witt, 1951; Pepper and others, 1954, p. 12); and the Euclid 2 sandstone (Prosser, 1912, p. 370). The unit is Upper Devoni- 1 Cuyahoga 0 5 Miles an (Famennian) in age (Pashin and Ettensohn, 1995), but has N River been considered to be Mississippian by a number of authors 0 5 Kilometers (for example, Pepper and others, 1954). The Euclid is a discontinuous, lens-shaped layer. When seen at any particular locality, the unit appears to consist of Figure 1. Sketch map of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, showing rep- thick horizontal layers, but these layers thin out laterally and resentative localities where Euclid bluestone has been quarried. become discontinuous. Thus the Euclid is found only in part The Cuyahoga River and Euclid Creek are shown, as is the pres- of the outcrop area of the Bedford Formation. ent outline of the city of Cleveland. More than a dozen quarries once dotted Cuyahoga County. Locations shown: 1) Indepen- History of Quarrying dence quarry, Independence Township; 2) Boyas quarry, Valley View, Independence Township; 3) Caine quarry, southeast Cleve- Historically, the three most important rock units quar- land (once part of Newburgh Township); 4) Lake View Cemetery ried for building stone in northeastern Ohio were the Euclid quarry, Cleveland Heights; 5) Rockefeller quarry, Forest Hill Park, Cleveland Heights; 6) Maxwell/Malone quarry, South Euclid (once bluestone, the Berea Sandstone, and the Sharon Formation. part of Euclid); 7) Forest City (McFarland) quarry, South Euclid The Berea (Hannibal, 1985; Hannibal and others, 2006), (once part of Euclid). The star indicates the site of the quarry still quarried for dimension stone, is the best known of these. town of Bluestone, South Euclid (once part of Euclid). The Sharon was used for dimension stone in the nineteenth century and is used for crushed stone today (Hannibal and Foos, 2003; Hannibal, 2006). Although it was an important Several quarries in the early 1800s were opened just east dimension stone quarried for most of the nineteenth and and south of what was then the little town of Cleveland. This twentieth centuries in the Cleveland area, the Euclid is the predates the documented beginnings of the famous bluestone least studied of these rock units. quarries of the state of New York, which began production Euclid bluestone has been quarried along a northeast- in the mid-1800s, according to Bowles (1939, p. 97) and southwest–trending, arcuate outcrop area in and east of Albanese and Kelly (1991, p. 196). The quarries may have Cleveland (fig. 1) (Cushing and others, 1931, pl. 20; opened slightly earlier, however, as Merrill, writing in 1886, Lewis, 1988, fig. 5). It was one of the first stones quarried in the Cleveland region, as the Euclid was the closest available dimension stone both stratigraphically and geographically to the growing town of Cleveland in the early 1800s. Portions of the Euclid are composed of or weather to thin, flaggy beds (fig. 2) utilized early in the first decades of the nineteenth century. Slabs pried from rock outcrops along streams and elsewhere could be directly used for sidewalk stone after trimming. Indeed, Van Horn (1931, p. 107) not- ed that thin beds were used without sawing into the twentieth century, although to a limited extent. Beds a few inches thick could also be trimmed for use as tablet-style gravestones, in vogue during the early 1800s (Bauer and others, 2002), and as capstones for field- or rough-stone walls.
Recommended publications
  • Cambrian Ordovician
    Open File Report LXXVI the shale is also variously colored. Glauconite is generally abundant in the formation. The Eau Claire A Summary of the Stratigraphy of the increases in thickness southward in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan where it becomes much more Southern Peninsula of Michigan * dolomitic. by: The Dresbach sandstone is a fine to medium grained E. J. Baltrusaites, C. K. Clark, G. V. Cohee, R. P. Grant sandstone with well rounded and angular quartz grains. W. A. Kelly, K. K. Landes, G. D. Lindberg and R. B. Thin beds of argillaceous dolomite may occur locally in Newcombe of the Michigan Geological Society * the sandstone. It is about 100 feet thick in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan but is absent in Northern Indiana. The Franconia sandstone is a fine to medium grained Cambrian glauconitic and dolomitic sandstone. It is from 10 to 20 Cambrian rocks in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan feet thick where present in the Southern Peninsula. consist of sandstone, dolomite, and some shale. These * See last page rocks, Lake Superior sandstone, which are of Upper Cambrian age overlie pre-Cambrian rocks and are The Trempealeau is predominantly a buff to light brown divided into the Jacobsville sandstone overlain by the dolomite with a minor amount of sandy, glauconitic Munising. The Munising sandstone at the north is dolomite and dolomitic shale in the basal part. Zones of divided southward into the following formations in sandy dolomite are in the Trempealeau in addition to the ascending order: Mount Simon, Eau Claire, Dresbach basal part. A small amount of chert may be found in and Franconia sandstones overlain by the Trampealeau various places in the formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan
    STRATIGRAPHIC DOMINANT LITHOLOGY ERA PERIOD EPOCHNORTHSTAGES AMERICANBasin Margin Basin Center MEMBER FORMATIONGROUP SUCCESSION IN LOWER Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift PENINSULA Cenozoic Pleistocene OF MICHIGAN Mesozoic Jurassic ?Kimmeridgian? Ionia Sandstone Late Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Conemaugh Grand River Formation Geological Survey Division Late Harold Fitch, State Geologist Pennsylvanian and Saginaw Formation ?Pottsville? Michigan Basin Geological Society Early GEOL IN OG S IC A A B L N Parma Sandstone S A O G C I I H E C T I Y Bayport Limestone M Meramecian Grand Rapids Group 1936 Late Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Mississippian Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman Osagian Marshall Sandstone Principal Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Early Kinderhookian Coldwater Shale Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Sunbury Shale Dr. Dave B.Westjohn Mark S. Wollensak Berea Sandstone Chautauquan Bedford Shale 2000 Late Antrim Shale Senecan Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale Dundee Limestone Middle Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Ulsterian Sylvania Sandstone Bois Blanc Formation Garden Island Formation Early Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Paleozoic Glacial Clay or Silt Late Cayugan Salina F Unit Till/Gravel Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Limestone Salina C Shale Salina Group Salina B Unit Sandy Limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Silurian Salina A-2 Evaporite Shaley Limestone Ruff Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Digital Version of the Pathfinder Powered By
    Powered by Table of Contents Click or touch a section below to access it directly. The home button in the 3 Message from upper left will return you here. Executive Leadership Cleveland Metroparks - 4 By the Numbers 5 Legend 6 Acacia Reservation 7 Bedford Reservation 9 Big Creek Reservation 10 Bradley Woods Reservation 11 Brecksville Reservation 13 Brookside Reservation 14 Cleveland Metroparks Zoo 15 Euclid Creek Reservation 16 Garf ield Park Reservation 17 Hinckley Reservation 18 Huntington Reservation 19 Lakefront Reservation 21 Mill Stream Run Reservation 23 North Chagrin Reservation 24 Ohio & Erie Canal Reservation 25 Rocky River Reservation 27 South Chagrin Reservation 28 Washington Reservation 29 West Creek Reservation 30 Activities by Park 31 Find Your Course 32 Be a Trailblazer / Directory Message from Executive Leadership Cleveland Metroparks now more than ever, serves as a resource for everyone in our community to f ind peace and comfort, as well as strength and restoration. The park district serves 48 diverse communities across Northeast Ohio. The dedication and hard work of Cleveland Metroparks employees is what makes the park district among the best in the nation. It is our goal to have a workforce that’s as diverse as the communities we serve. Building connections into the community is and will always be a top priority. However, the theme of connections goes beyond geography. Over time, Cleveland Metroparks has built a community of park-goers and we are all joined together by our shared love of nature. The park district’s 18 reservations, eight golf courses and nationally-acclaimed Zoo exist for all.
    [Show full text]
  • Hike #4 Wildwood Park Fall Wetland Cleanup
    Euclid Creek August / September News & Summer Newsletter Please find the Euclid Creek Summer Newsletter by clicking here. This edition covers the following: Day in the Life of Euclid Creek Recap Upcoming Events & Meetings Friends of Euclid Creek Updates: - President's Message - Watershed Wildlife - Scholarship Announced - 15 Year Anniversary Upcoming Events Acacia Reservation Restoration Starting this Fall Urban Ravines: a means to regenerate local ecology Watershed Action Plan Update Illegal Dumping, a Continuous Problem in Watershed Euclid Creek Watershed Summit Announcement Featured Events FOEC Fifteen Miles with Friends - Hike #4 Anniversary hike at Let's continue the 15th anniversary celebration of Friends of Euclid Creek. Join us Acacia for the fourth hike in our series of Fifteen Miles with Friends. We will hike one and a Reservation half miles in the Euclid Creek Reservation- Wildwood Park in Cleveland. After on August completing this hike you will have reached the 3/4 point in your 15 miles! 2, Hike #3 When: September 6, at 6:30-8:00pm Where: Wildwood Park, Euclid Creek Reservation, Cleveland - park entrance at E. 174th Street and Lakeshore Blvd., 44110 Who: The hike will be led by Chris Vild, Vice President of FOEC. Hike difficulty: Flat to moderately rolling portions, slow pace; mostly paved with some creek/wetland edge walking. Parking: Park/meet up at the Wildwood Picnic Shelter. Come out and see the restoration project three years after project completion and all of the wildlife enjoying the native habitat. Please contact Ken Rapport at 216-287-8693 with additional questions. To see details about our last two scheduled hikes, click here.
    [Show full text]
  • Researching Stonehenge: Theories Past and Present
    Parker Pearson, M 2013 Researching Stonehenge: Theories Past and Present. Archaeology International, No. 16 (2012-2013): 72-83, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ai.1601 ARTICLE Researching Stonehenge: Theories Past and Present Mike Parker Pearson* Over the years archaeologists connected with the Institute of Archaeology and UCL have made substantial contributions to the study of Stonehenge, the most enigmatic of all the prehistoric stone circles in Britain. Two of the early researchers were Petrie and Childe. More recently, colleagues in UCL’s Anthropology department – Barbara Bender and Chris Tilley – have also studied and written about the monument in its landscape. Mike Parker Pearson, who joined the Institute in 2012, has been leading a 10-year-long research programme on Stonehenge and, in this paper, he outlines the history and cur- rent state of research. Petrie and Childe on Stonehenge William Flinders Petrie (Fig. 1) worked on Stonehenge between 1874 and 1880, publishing the first accurate plan of the famous stones as a young man yet to start his career in Egypt. His numbering system of the monument’s many sarsens and blue- stones is still used to this day, and his slim book, Stonehenge: Plans, Descriptions, and Theories, sets out theories and observations that were innovative and insightful. Denied the opportunity of excavating Stonehenge, Petrie had relatively little to go on in terms of excavated evidence – the previous dig- gings had yielded few prehistoric finds other than antler picks – but he suggested that four theories could be considered indi- vidually or in combination for explaining Stonehenge’s purpose: sepulchral, religious, astronomical and monumental.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Devonian Berea Sandstone in Southeastern Ohio
    SUBSURFACE FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE DEVONIAN BEREA SANDSTONE IN SOUTHEASTERN OHIO William T. Garnes A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2014 Committee: James Evans, Advisor Jeffrey Snyder Charles Onasch ii ABSTRACT James Evans, Advisor The Devonian Berea Sandstone is an internally complex, heterogeneous unit that appears prominently both in outcrop and subsurface in Ohio. While the unit is clearly deltaic in outcrops in northeastern Ohio, its depositional setting is more problematic in southeastern Ohio where it is only found in the subsurface. The goal of this project was to search for evidence of a barrier island/inlet channel depositional environment for the Berea Sandstone to assess whether the Berea Sandstone was deposited under conditions in southeastern Ohio unique from northeastern Ohio. This project involved looking at cores from 5 wells: 3426 (Athens Co.), 3425 (Meigs Co.), 3253 (Athens Co.), 3252 (Athens Co.), and 3251 (Athens Co.) In cores, the Berea Sandstone ranges from 2 to 10 m (8-32 ft) thick, with an average thickness of 6.3 m (20.7 ft). Core descriptions involved hand specimens, thin section descriptions, and core photography. In addition to these 5 wells, the gamma ray logs from 13 wells were used to interpret the architecture and lithologies of the Berea Sandstone in Athens Co. and Meigs Co. as well as surrounding Vinton, Washington, and Morgan counties. Analysis from this study shows evidence of deltaic lobe progradation, abandonment, and re-working. Evidence of interdistributary bays with shallow sub-tidal environments, as well as large sand bodies, is also present.
    [Show full text]
  • Stonefloors & Stonewalls Online Catalogue
    Pty Ltd 32 Bryant Street, Padstow NSW 2211 ABN 86 089 623 487 Tel: (02) 9773 5677 Fax: (02) 9773 5644 Email: [email protected] StoneFloors & StoneWalls Online catalogue: www.cinajus.com Which Stone Where – an introductory guide to material selection We have all been bamboozled by salespeople trying to explain the virtues of the latest product – whether it be a computer or a car. Choosing stone need not be the same experience. By understanding stone’s basic properties you can make an educated decision when you are selecting stone for your next project. The ‘right stone’ for your project needs to meet requirements based on appearance and performance. Selecting suitable flooring, for example, is firstly a matter of personal taste. One of the appealing aspects of using stone is how its unique character can be used to display your own distinctive personality. The range of colours, textures and finishes available in stone now rivals the range available in more ‘traditional’ floor coverings. Like these coverings, choosing a stone that is durable and resistant to staining and wear is important. The first step is to understand the strengths and challenges of the various types of stone available. Below is a brief beginner’s guide to the seven main stone types commercially available. Stone Type: Sandstone Formation and composition: A sedimentary rock composed predominantly of quartz usually cemented together with clay and/or fused with secondary silica which has been chemically deposited. Minor minerals containing iron and manganese (among others) give the stone its unique characteristics. The movement of these soluble minerals throughout the stone can produce banding or develop as a uniform colour.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Geology of Northeastern Ohio
    SDMS US EPA REGION V -1 SOME IMAGES WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE ILLEGIBLE DUE TO BAD SOURCE DOCUMENTS. GUIDE TO THE GEOLOGY of NORTHEASTERN OHIO Edited by P. O. BANKS & RODNEY M. FELDMANN 1970 Northern Ohio Geological Society ELYP.i.A PU&UC LIBRARt as, BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF NORTHEASTERN OHIO PENNSYLVANIAN SYSTEM MISSISSIPPIAN SYSTEM DEVONIAN SYSTEM \V&fe'£:i£:VS:#: CANTON viSlSWSSWM FIGURr I Geologic map of northeastern Ohio. Individual formations within each time unit are not dis- -guished, and glacial deposits have been omitted. Because the bedding planes are nearly ••.crizontal, the map patterns of the contacts closely resemble the topographic contours at those z evations. The older and deeper units are most extensively exposed where the major rivers rave cut into them, while the younger units are preserved in the intervening higher areas. CO «< in Dev. Mississippian r-c Penn. a> 3 CO CD BRADF. KINOERHOOK MERAMEC —1 OSAGE CHESTER POTTSVIUE ro to r-» c-> e-> e= e-i GO n « -n V) CO V* o ^_ ^ 0. = -^ eo CO 3 c= « ^> <C3 at ta B> ^ °» eu ra to a O9 eo ^ a* s 1= ca \ *** CO ^ CO to CM v» o' CO to CO 3 =3 13- *•» \ ¥\ A. FIGURE 1. Columnar section ol the major stratigraphic units in northeastern Ohio showing their relative positions in the standard geologic time scale. The Devonian-Mississippian boundary is not known with certainty to lie within the Cleveland Shale. The base of the Mississippian in the northern part of the state is transitional with the Bradford Series of the Devonian System and may lie within the Cleveland Shale (Weller er a/., 1948).
    [Show full text]
  • 22 AUG 2021 Index Acadia Rock 14967
    19 SEP 2021 Index 543 Au Sable Point 14863 �� � � � � 324, 331 Belle Isle 14976 � � � � � � � � � 493 Au Sable Point 14962, 14963 �� � � � 468 Belle Isle, MI 14853, 14848 � � � � � 290 Index Au Sable River 14863 � � � � � � � 331 Belle River 14850� � � � � � � � � 301 Automated Mutual Assistance Vessel Res- Belle River 14852, 14853� � � � � � 308 cue System (AMVER)� � � � � 13 Bellevue Island 14882 �� � � � � � � 346 Automatic Identification System (AIS) Aids Bellow Island 14913 � � � � � � � 363 A to Navigation � � � � � � � � 12 Belmont Harbor 14926, 14928 � � � 407 Au Train Bay 14963 � � � � � � � � 469 Benson Landing 14784 � � � � � � 500 Acadia Rock 14967, 14968 � � � � � 491 Au Train Island 14963 � � � � � � � 469 Benton Harbor, MI 14930 � � � � � 381 Adams Point 14864, 14880 �� � � � � 336 Au Train Point 14969 � � � � � � � 469 Bete Grise Bay 14964 � � � � � � � 475 Agate Bay 14966 �� � � � � � � � � 488 Avon Point 14826� � � � � � � � � 259 Betsie Lake 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agate Harbor 14964� � � � � � � � 476 Betsie River 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agriculture, Department of� � � � 24, 536 B Biddle Point 14881 �� � � � � � � � 344 Ahnapee River 14910 � � � � � � � 423 Biddle Point 14911 �� � � � � � � � 444 Aids to navigation � � � � � � � � � 10 Big Bay 14932 �� � � � � � � � � � 379 Baby Point 14852� � � � � � � � � 306 Air Almanac � � � � � � � � � � � 533 Big Bay 14963, 14964 �� � � � � � � 471 Bad River 14863, 14867 � � � � � � 327 Alabaster, MI 14863 � � � � � � � � 330 Big Bay 14967 �� � � � � � � � � � 490 Baileys
    [Show full text]
  • 2713^7 Contents
    MINERALS OF WASHINGTON, D.C. AND VICINITY by Lawrence R. Bernstein U. S. Geo^r^'ce.l Survey OPEN F-'::. r;.".r'0.?;r cer.-..: 2713^7 CONTENTS Introduction 1 Scope of report 4 Mineral collecting 5 Acknowledgments 6 Introduction 6a ITT3 Aclj.il1 -> ! T^______.___~^. -"» _«_____«..«_»«__.. " " .._.«__._.._*_.__._.,_.._.-. _>-.-- -_>-->.-..-. Q Triassic deposits 31 Mineral localities 38 District of Columbia : 38 IMavtrlWlCfci JT XClilUl a Tirl ~ __ ___« - - -_ -»-i-___ .__- _ __- - ________________ m~m~m~ m~ m~ «M » M* **A^J ^ Anne Arundel County 43 Baltimore County 45 Howard County - 74 Montgomery County 88 Prince Georges County 120 Virginia . 129 Arlington County 129 Fairfax County 131 Fauquier County 139 Loudoun County 143 Prince William County 149 Diabase quarries of northern Virginia 155 CAPTIONS Illustrations Plate 1. Mineral localities of Washington, B.C., and vicinity. Plate 2. Generalized geologic map of Washington. D.C. and vicinity, Plate 3. Mineral deposits and generalized geology of the Triassic rocks near Washington, D.C. List of Figures Figure 1. Index map showing region covered in this report. Stfaded area is covered in most detail. Figure 2. Block diagram of the Washington, D.C. region showing physiographic provinces and major geographic and geologic features. ITfgure -3. Coastal Plain deposits of Washington, D.C. and vicinity. Figure 4. Generalized cross section of a typical complex pegmatite of the Washington, D.C. area. Figure 5. Rhythmically.layered gabbro of the Baltimore Gabbro Com­ plex at Ilchester, Maryland. Figure 6. Triassic diabase dike forming a ridge north of Route 7 near Dranesville, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Devonian and Early Mississippian Distal Basin-Margin Sedimentation of Northern Ohio1
    Late Devonian and Early Mississippian Distal Basin-Margin Sedimentation of Northern Ohio1 THOMAS L. LEWIS, Department of Geological Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115 ABSTRACT. Clastic sediments, derived from southeastern, eastern and northeastern sources, prograded west- ward into a shallow basin at the northwestern margin of the Appalachian Basin in Late Devonian and Early Mississippian time. The western and northwestern boundary of the basin was the submerged Cincinnati Arch. The marine clastic wedges provided a northwest paleoslope and a distal, gentle shelf-edge margin that controlled directional emplacement of coarse elastics. Rising sea levels coupled with differences in sedimen- tation rates and localized soft-sediment deformation within the basin help explain some features of the Bedford and Berea Formations. The presence of sand-filled mudcracks and flat-topped symmetrical ripple marks in the Berea Formation attest to very shallow water deposition and local subaerial exposure at the time of emplacement of part of the formation. Absence of thick, channel-form deposits eastward suggests loss of section during emergence. OHIO J. SCI. 88 (1): 23-39, 1988 INTRODUCTION The Bedford Formation (Newberry 1870) is the most The Ohio Shale, Bedford, and Berea Formations of lithologically varied formation of the group. It is com- northern Ohio are clastic units which record prograda- prised of gray and red mudshales, siltstone, and very tional and transgressional events during Late Devonian fine-grained sandstone. The Bedford Formation thins and Early Mississippian time. The sequence of sediments both to the east and west and reaches its maximum is characterized by (1) gray mudshale, clayshale, siltstone, thickness in the Cleveland area.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District – Euclid Creek Report
    NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT 2018 Euclid Creek Environmental Monitoring Biological, Water Quality and Habitat Survey Results Prepared by Water Quality and Industrial Surveillance Division 2018 Euclid Creek Environmental Monitoring Results April 22, 2019 Introduction In 2018, the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (NEORSD) conducted water chemistry sampling, habitat assessments, and fish and benthic macroinvertebrate community surveys on Euclid Creek. Euclid Creek drains the communities of South Euclid, Lyndhurst, Willoughby Hills, Richmond Heights, Highland Heights, Euclid and Cleveland before emptying into Lake Erie. Sampling was conducted by NEORSD Level 3 Qualified Data Collectors certified by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) in Fish Community and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Biology, Chemical Water Quality and Stream Habitat Assessments as explained in the NEORSD study plan 2018 Euclid Creek Environmental Monitoring approved by Ohio EPA on April 3, 2018. One of the study objectives at river miles (RM) 0.40, 0.55 and 1.65, on the main branch of Euclid Creek, was to assess the attainment status of the stream segments. The sites at RM 0.55 and 1.65 are also required under the Ohio EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. 3PA00002*HD. The site at RM 0.40 was evaluated post restoration for water chemistry, fish, macroinvertebrates, and habitat. An additional objective at RMs 0.40, 0.55 and 1.65 was to collect pre- and post- construction data of three NEORSD Project Clean Lake capital improvement projects that will reduce the current amount of over 60 combined sewer overflow (CSO) discharges per year to less than 2 per year entering Euclid Creek.
    [Show full text]