Modifications to Gray Triggerfish Catch Levels

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Modifications to Gray Triggerfish Catch Levels Tab B, No. 6(a) 1/20/2021 Modifications to Gray Triggerfish Catch Levels Framework Action to the Fishery Management Plan for Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico Including Environmental Assessment January 2021 This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA20NMF4410011. This page intentionally blank ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET Name of Action Framework Action to the Fishery Management Plan for Reef Fish Resources in the Gulf of Mexico: Modification to Gray Triggerfish Catch Levels including Environmental Assessment. Responsible Agencies and Contact Persons Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) 813-348-1630 4107 W. Spruce Street, Suite 200 813-348-1711 (fax) Tampa, Florida 33607 [email protected] Carly Somerset ([email protected]) Gulf Council Website National Marine Fisheries Service (Lead Agency) 727-824-5305 Southeast Regional Office 727-824-5308 (fax) 263 13th Avenue South SERO Website St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 Kelli O’Donnell ([email protected]) Type of Action ( ) Administrative ( ) Legislative (X) Draft ( ) Final Updates to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508) became effective on September 14, 2020 [85 FR 43304]. This draft Environmental Assessment was prepared using the updated definition of effects or impacts in 50 CFR § 1508.1(g). Any effect or impact evaluated in this draft EA has been determined to meet the two-part standard for “reasonable foreseeability” and “reasonably close causal connection” required by the new definition. Modifications to i Gray Triggerfish Catch Levels ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ABC acceptable biological catch ACL annual catch limit ACT annual catch target ALS Accumulated Landings System AM accountability measures AP Advisory Panel APAIS Access Point Angler Intercept Survey BEA U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis CFpA cash flow per angler CHTS Coastal Household Telephone Survey Council Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council CS consumer surplus EA environmental assessment EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EFH essential fish habitat EIS environmental impact statement E.O. Executive Order EJ Environmental Justice ESA Endangered Species Act F fishing mortality FES Fishing Effort Survey FL fork length FMP fishery management plan GDP gross domestic product Gulf Gulf of Mexico Fishery gw gutted weight HAPC Habitat Areas of Particular Concern IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change MFMT maximum fishing mortality threshold MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act mp million pounds MRFSS Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey MRIP Marine Recreational Information Program MSST minimum stock size threshold MSY maximum sustainable yield NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Opinion Biological Opinion OFL overfishing limit OY optimum yield PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons pw product weight Reef Fish FMP Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf Modifications to ii Gray Triggerfish Catch Levels of Mexico RFA Regulatory Flexibility Analysis RIR Regulatory Impact Review SDC status determination criteria SEAMAP Southeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program SEDAR Southeast Data Assessment and Review SEFSC Southeast Fishery Science Center SFA Sustainable Fisheries Act SPR spawning potential ratio SRHS Southeast Region Headboat Survey SSB spawning stock biomass SSC Scientific and Statistical Committee SSRG Social Science Research Group TL total length TNR trip net revenue ww whole weight Modifications to iii Gray Triggerfish Catch Levels TABLE OF CONTENTS Environmental Assessment Cover Sheet ......................................................................................... i Abbreviations Used in this Document ............................................................................................ ii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................. 3 1.3 History of Management .................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2. Management Alternatives ......................................................................................... 5 2.1 Action 1 – Modify the Gray Triggerfish ABC, ACLs, and ACTs .................................... 5 Chapter 3. Affected Environment ............................................................................................... 7 3.1 Description of the Physical Environment ......................................................................... 7 3.2 Description of the Biological/Ecological Environment .................................................... 9 3.2.1 Gray Triggerfish......................................................................................................... 9 3.2.2 General Information on Reef Fish Species .............................................................. 11 3.3 Description of the Economic Environment ................................................................ 17 3.3.1 Commercial Sector .............................................................................................. 17 3.3.2 Recreational Sector ............................................................................................. 22 3.4 Description of the Social Environment ........................................................................... 30 3.4.1 Commercial Fishing ................................................................................................. 31 3.4.2 Recreational Fishing ................................................................................................ 33 3.4.3 Environmental Justice Considerations ..................................................................... 35 3.4.4 Community Social Vulnerability Indices ................................................................ 36 3.5 Description of the Administrative Environment ........................................................ 37 3.5.1 Federal Fishery Management ................................................................................... 37 3.5.2 State Fishery Management .................................................................................. 38 Chapter 4. Environmental Consequences ................................................................................. 39 4.1 Action 1: Modify the Gray Triggerfish ABC, ACLs, and ACTs .................................... 39 4.1.1 Effects on the Physical Environment ....................................................................... 39 4.1.2 Effects on the Biological Environment .................................................................... 40 4.1.3 Effects on the Economic Environment .................................................................... 41 4.1.4 Effects on the Social Environment .......................................................................... 42 Modifications to iv Gray Triggerfish Catch Levels 4.1.5 Effects on the Administrative Environment ............................................................ 43 Chapter 5: Agencies, Organizations and Persons Consulted .................................................... 44 Chapter 6: List of Preparers ...................................................................................................... 45 Chapter 7: References ............................................................................................................... 46 Appendix A. ACL/ACT Control Rules for Gray Triggerfish ....................................................... 56 Appendix B. Changes to recreational data collection ................................................................... 58 Appendix C. Appendix C. Other Applicable Law ........................................................................ 60 Modifications to v Gray Triggerfish Catch Levels LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1.1 Gray triggerfish recreational landings, data collection units, recreational ACL, payback-adjusted ACL, percent ACL landed, and closure dates for the years 2008 through 2019. ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Table 1.1.2. Gray triggerfish commercial landings, commercial ACL, payback-adjusted ACL, percent ACL landed, and closure dates for 2008-2019. .................................................................. 2 Table 3.1.2. Total Gulf greenhouse gas 2014 emissions estimates ............................................... 9 Table 3.2.2.1. Status of species in
Recommended publications
  • A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And
    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes THIRD EDITION GSMFC No. 300 NOVEMBER 2020 i Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Commissioners and Proxies ALABAMA Senator R.L. “Bret” Allain, II Chris Blankenship, Commissioner State Senator District 21 Alabama Department of Conservation Franklin, Louisiana and Natural Resources John Roussel Montgomery, Alabama Zachary, Louisiana Representative Chris Pringle Mobile, Alabama MISSISSIPPI Chris Nelson Joe Spraggins, Executive Director Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Mississippi Department of Marine Bon Secour, Alabama Resources Biloxi, Mississippi FLORIDA Read Hendon Eric Sutton, Executive Director USM/Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Florida Fish and Wildlife Ocean Springs, Mississippi Conservation Commission Tallahassee, Florida TEXAS Representative Jay Trumbull Carter Smith, Executive Director Tallahassee, Florida Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas LOUISIANA Doug Boyd Jack Montoucet, Secretary Boerne, Texas Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Baton Rouge, Louisiana GSMFC Staff ASMFC Staff Mr. David M. Donaldson Mr. Bob Beal Executive Director Executive Director Mr. Steven J. VanderKooy Mr. Jeffrey Kipp IJF Program Coordinator Stock Assessment Scientist Ms. Debora McIntyre Dr. Kristen Anstead IJF Staff Assistant Fisheries Scientist ii A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes Third Edition Edited by Steve VanderKooy Jessica Carroll Scott Elzey Jessica Gilmore Jeffrey Kipp Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission 2404 Government St Ocean Springs, MS 39564 and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1050 N. Highland Street Suite 200 A-N Arlington, VA 22201 Publication Number 300 November 2020 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA15NMF4070076 and NA15NMF4720399.
    [Show full text]
  • Faunistic Resources Used As Medicines by Artisanal Fishermen from Siribinha Beach, State of Bahia, Brazil'
    Journal of Ethnobiology 20(1): 93-109 Summer 2000 FAUNISTIC RESOURCES USED AS MEDICINES BY ARTISANAL FISHERMEN FROM SIRIBINHA BEACH, STATE OF BAHIA, BRAZIL' ERALOO M. COSTA-NETOAND jost GERALOO w. MARQUES Departamento de CiCllcias BioJ6gicas Universidade Estadual de Feim de Santana, Km 3, 8R 116, Call/pus Ulliversitririo, CEP 44031-460, Feirn de Salltalla, Bahia, Brasil ABSTRACT.- Artisanal fishermen from Siribinha Beach in the State of Bahia, Northeastern Brazil, have been using several marine/estuarine animal resources as folk medicines. Wf.> hilve recorded the employment of mollusks, crustaceans, echinoderms, fishes, reptiles, and cetace<lns, and noted a high predominance of fishes over other aquatic animals. Asthma, bronchitis, stroke, and wounds arc the most usual illnesses treated by animal-based medicines. These results corroborate Marques' zoothcrapeutic universality hypothesis. According to him, all human cultures that prcscnt a developed medical system do use animals as medicines. Further studies are requested in order to estimate the existence of bioactive compounds of ph<lrmacological value in these bioresources. Key words: Fishennen, marine resources, medicine, Bahia, Brazil RESUMO.-Pescadores artcsanais da Praia de Siribinha, estado da Bahia, Nordeste do Brasil, utilizam varios recursos animais marinhos/estuarinos como remedios populares. Registramos 0 e.mprego de moluscos, crustaceos, equinoderrnos, peixes, repteis e cetaceos. Observou-se uma alta predominilncia de peixes sobre outros animais aquaticos. Asma, bronquite, derrame e ferimentos sao as afecr;6es mais usualmente tratadas com remedios Ii. base de animais. Estes resultados corroboram a hip6tese da universalidadc zooterapeutica de Marqucs. De <lcordo com cle, toda cultura humana quc .1preSe.nta urn sistema medico desenvolvido utiliza-se de animais como remlidios, Estudos posteriores sao neccssarios a fim de avaliar a existcncia de compostos bioativos de valor farmacol6gico nesses biorrecursos.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fish Conservation Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions
    Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca0 K. Smith & William J. Sutherland CONSERVATION EVIDENCE SERIES SYNOPSES Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca K. Smith and William J. Sutherland Conservation Evidence Series Synopses 1 Copyright © 2021 William J. Sutherland This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Taylor, N., Clarke, L.J., Alliji, K., Barrett, C., McIntyre, R., Smith, R.K., and Sutherland, W.J. (2021) Marine Fish Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions. Synopses of Conservation Evidence Series. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Further details about CC BY licenses are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cover image: Circling fish in the waters of the Halmahera Sea (Pacific Ocean) off the Raja Ampat Islands, Indonesia, by Leslie Burkhalter. Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Resources Reading: Chapter 3 Invertebrate and Vertebrate Fisheries  Diversity and Life History  Species Important Globally  Species Important Locally
    Exploited Fishery Resources Reading: Chapter 3 Invertebrate and vertebrate fisheries Diversity and life history species important globally species important locally Fisheries involving Invertebrate Phyla Mollusca • Bivalves, Gastropods and Cephalopods Echinodermata • sea cucumbers and urchins Arthropoda • Sub-phylum Crustacea: • shrimps and prawns • clawed lobsters, crayfish • clawless lobsters • crabs Phylum Mollusca: Bivalves Fisheries • Oysters, Scallops, Mussels, and Clams • World catch > 1 million MT • Ideal for aquaculture (mariculture) • Comm. and rec. in shallow water 1 Phylum Mollusca: Gastropods Fisheries • Snails, whelks, abalone • Largest number of species • Most harvested from coastal areas • Food & ornamental shell trade • Depletion of stocks (e.g. abalone) due to habitat destruction & overexploitation Phylum Mollusca: Cephalopods Fisheries • Squid, octopus, nautilus • 70% of world mollusc catch = squids • Inshore squid caught with baited jigs, purse seines, & trawls • Oceanic: gill nets & jigging Phylum Echinodermata Fisheries • Sea cucumbers and sea urchins Sea cucumber fisheries • Indian & Pacific oceans, cultured in Japan • slow growth rates, difficult to sustain Sea urchin fisheries • roe (gonads) a delicacy • seasonal based on roe availability Both Easily Overexploited 2 Sub-phylum Crustacea: Shrimps & Prawns Prawn fisheries • extensive farming (high growth rate & fecundity) • Penaeids with high commercial value • stocks in Australia have collapsed due to overfishing & destruction of inshore nursery areas Caridean
    [Show full text]
  • © Iccat, 2007
    A5 By-catch Species APPENDIX 5: BY-CATCH SPECIES A.5 By-catch species By-catch is the unintentional/incidental capture of non-target species during fishing operations. Different types of fisheries have different types and levels of by-catch, depending on the gear used, the time, area and depth fished, etc. Article IV of the Convention states: "the Commission shall be responsible for the study of the population of tuna and tuna-like fishes (the Scombriformes with the exception of Trichiuridae and Gempylidae and the genus Scomber) and such other species of fishes exploited in tuna fishing in the Convention area as are not under investigation by another international fishery organization". The following is a list of by-catch species recorded as being ever caught by any major tuna fishery in the Atlantic/Mediterranean. Note that the lists are qualitative and are not indicative of quantity or mortality. Thus, the presence of a species in the lists does not imply that it is caught in significant quantities, or that individuals that are caught necessarily die. Skates and rays Scientific names Common name Code LL GILL PS BB HARP TRAP OTHER Dasyatis centroura Roughtail stingray RDC X Dasyatis violacea Pelagic stingray PLS X X X X Manta birostris Manta ray RMB X X X Mobula hypostoma RMH X Mobula lucasana X Mobula mobular Devil ray RMM X X X X X Myliobatis aquila Common eagle ray MYL X X Pteuromylaeus bovinus Bull ray MPO X X Raja fullonica Shagreen ray RJF X Raja straeleni Spotted skate RFL X Rhinoptera spp Cownose ray X Torpedo nobiliana Torpedo
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Marine Demersal Fishes Captured by the Pair Trawl Fisheries in Southern (RJ-SC) Brazil
    Biota Neotropica 19(1): e20170432, 2019 www.scielo.br/bn ISSN 1676-0611 (online edition) Inventory Checklist of marine demersal fishes captured by the pair trawl fisheries in Southern (RJ-SC) Brazil Matheus Marcos Rotundo1,2,3,4 , Evandro Severino-Rodrigues2, Walter Barrella4,5, Miguel Petrere Jun- ior3 & Milena Ramires4,5 1Universidade Santa Cecilia, Acervo Zoológico, R. Oswaldo Cruz, 266, CEP11045-907, Santos, SP, Brasil 2Instituto de Pesca, Programa de Pós-graduação em Aquicultura e Pesca, Santos, SP, Brasil 3Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Planejamento e Uso de Recursos Renováveis, Rodovia João Leme dos Santos, Km 110, CEP 18052-780, Sorocaba, SP, Brasil 4Universidade Santa Cecília, Programa de Pós-Graduação de Auditoria Ambiental, R. Oswaldo Cruz, 266, CEP11045-907, Santos, SP, Brasil 5Universidade Santa Cecília, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sustentabilidade de Ecossistemas Costeiros e Marinhos, R. Oswaldo Cruz, 266, CEP11045-907, Santos, SP, Brasil *Corresponding author: Matheus Marcos Rotundo: [email protected] ROTUNDO, M.M., SEVERINO-RODRIGUES, E., BARRELLA, W., PETRERE JUNIOR, M., RAMIRES, M. Checklist of marine demersal fishes captured by the pair trawl fisheries in Southern (RJ-SC) Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 19(1): e20170432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2017-0432 Abstract: Demersal fishery resources are abundant on continental shelves, on the tropical and subtropical coasts, making up a significant part of the marine environment. Marine demersal fishery resources are captured by various fishing methods, often unsustainably, which has led to the depletion of their stocks. In order to inventory the marine demersal ichthyofauna on the Southern Brazilian coast, as well as their conservation status and distribution, this study analyzed the composition and frequency of occurrence of fish captured by pair trawling in 117 fishery fleet landings based in the State of São Paulo between 2005 and 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) for Monitoring Pelagic and Nocturnal Marine Species
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Technical Note A Time-Extended (24 h) Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) for Monitoring Pelagic and Nocturnal Marine Species Agusti Torres 1, Ana-Maria Abril 1,2 and Eric E. G. Clua 1,3,4,* 1 Shark-Med Association, Calle Joan Bonet, 25, Planta Baja, 07004 Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain; [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (A.-M.A.) 2 Department de Biologia. Cra. de Valldemossa, Universitat de les Illes Balears, km 7.5., 07004 Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain 3 PSL (Paris Science et Lettres) Université Paris: EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, USR 3278 CRIOBE BP 1013, 98729 Papetoai, Moorea, French Polynesia 4 Laboratoire d’Excellence ‘CORAIL’, 58 avenue Paul Alduy, F-66360 Perpignan, France * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 February 2020; Accepted: 14 March 2020; Published: 18 March 2020 Abstract: Baited remote underwater video systems (BRUVs) are efficient devices for remotely characterising the assemblage and relative density of fishes and other marine organisms. However, technological constraints (e.g., battery life and limited storage memory) typically limit deployment times to <2 h making it very difficult to capture the presence of marine species, including rare and elusive ones. We developed an extended duration (24 h) BRUV to enable fisheries-independent surveying of a pelagic shark population in the western Mediterranean. Video data revealed seven visits (three nocturnal, four diurnal) by blue sharks (Prionace glauca) over a period of 1355 h. In the future, this cost-effective device could be fitted with a wireless video transmitter to provide real-time observations of marine animals for scientific or ecotourism purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shallow-Water Macro Echinoderm Fauna of Nha Trang Bay (Vietnam): Status at the Onset of Protection of Habitats
    The Shallow-water Macro Echinoderm Fauna of Nha Trang Bay (Vietnam): Status at the Onset of Protection of Habitats Master Thesis in Marine Biology for the degree Candidatus scientiarum Øyvind Fjukmoen Institute of Biology University of Bergen Spring 2006 ABSTRACT Hon Mun Marine Protected Area, in Nha Trang Bay (South Central Vietnam) was established in 2002. In the first period after protection had been initiated, a baseline survey on the shallow-water macro echinoderm fauna was conducted. Reefs in the bay were surveyed by transects and free-swimming observations, over an area of about 6450 m2. The main area focused on was the core zone of the marine reserve, where fishing and harvesting is prohibited. Abundances, body sizes, microhabitat preferences and spatial patterns in distribution for the different species were analysed. A total of 32 different macro echinoderm taxa was recorded (7 crinoids, 9 asteroids, 7 echinoids and 8 holothurians). Reefs surveyed were dominated by the locally very abundant and widely distributed sea urchin Diadema setosum (Leske), which comprised 74% of all specimens counted. Most species were low in numbers, and showed high degree of small- scale spatial variation. Commercially valuable species of sea cucumbers and sea urchins were nearly absent from the reefs. Species inventories of shallow-water asteroids and echinoids in the South China Sea were analysed. The results indicate that the waters of Nha Trang have echinoid and asteroid fauna quite similar to that of the Spratly archipelago. Comparable pristine areas can thus be expected to be found around the offshore islands in the open parts of the South China Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement Patterns of Gray Triggerfish, Balistes Capriscus, Around Artificial Reefs in the Northern Gulf of Mexico
    Movement Patterns of Gray Triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, Around Artificial Reefs in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. by Jennifer L. Herbig A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama August 2, 2014 Keywords: VPS telemetry, Fine scale movements, Site fidelity Copyright 2014 by Jennifer Herbig Approved by Stephen T. Szedlmayer, Chair, Professor School Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences Terrill R. Hanson, Associate Professor School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences Stephen A. Bullard, Assistant Professor School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences ABSTRACT Relatively little is known about the ecology of gray triggerfish, Balistes capriscus Gmelin, despite its importance to both sport and commercial fisheries. In particular, gray triggerfish habitat use is not well understood. Fine scale tracking would provide an understanding of habitat use for gray triggerfish which may help with the future management of this species. Thus, this study was an attempt to implant ultrasonic transmitters in gray triggerfish and track their fine scale movement patterns around artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Adult gray triggerfish (n = 17) were successfully tagged with transmitters and tracked using the VR2W Positioning System (VPS). Most (84.2 %) tagged fish successfully survived and were tracked for extended periods (1 to 57 weeks), with only three fish lost within 24 hours of tagging (here considered a tagging artifact). Tagged gray triggerfish showed diel movement patterns with home ranges (95 % KDE) and core areas (50 % KDE) significantly larger during the day than night. Fish also showed seasonal movement patterns that were positively correlated with water temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Modifications to Gray Triggerfish Catch Levels
    3/5/2021 Modifications to Gray Triggerfish Catch Levels Final Framework Action to the Fishery Management Plan for Reef Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico Including Environmental Assessment, Regulatory Impact Review, and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis March 2021 This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA20NMF4410011. This page intentionally blank ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET Name of Action Framework Action to the Fishery Management Plan for Reef Fish Resources in the Gulf of Mexico: Modifications to Gray Triggerfish Catch Levels including Environmental Assessment, Regulatory Impact Review, and Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis. Responsible Agencies and Contact Persons Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) 813-348-1630 4107 W. Spruce Street, Suite 200 813-348-1711 (fax) Tampa, Florida 33607 [email protected] Carly Somerset ([email protected]) Gulf Council Website National Marine Fisheries Service (Lead Agency) 727-824-5305 Southeast Regional Office 727-824-5308 (fax) 263 13th Avenue South SERO Website St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 Kelli O’Donnell ([email protected]) Type of Action ( ) Administrative ( ) Legislative ( ) Draft (X) Final This Environmental Assessment is being prepared using the 2020 CEQ NEPA Regulations. The effective date of the 2020 CEQ NEPA Regulations was September 14, 2020, and reviews begun after this date are required to apply the 2020 regulations unless there is a clear and fundamental conflict with an applicable statute. 85 Fed. Reg. at 43372-73 (§§ 1506.13, 1507.3(a)). This Environmental Assessment began on January 28, 2021, and accordingly proceeds under the 2020 regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • And Gray Triggerfish (Balistes Capriscus)
    317 NOAA First U.S. Commissioner National Marine Fishery Bulletin established 1881 of Fisheries and founder Fisheries Service of Fishery Bulletin Abstract—The feeding habits of red porgy (Pagrus pagrus) and gray trig- Feeding habits of 2 reef-associated fishes, gerfish (Balistes capriscus) were in- red porgy (Pagrus pagrus) and gray triggerfish vestigated by examining the gut con- tents of specimens collected during (Balistes capriscus), off the southeastern 2009–2011 from live bottom habitats off the southeastern United States. United States Red porgy had a diverse diet of 188 different taxa. Decapods, barnacles, Sarah F. Goldman (contact author) and bivalves were their main prey. Canonical correlation analysis indi- Dawn M. Glasgow cated that depth, season, and fish Michelle M. Falk length were statistically significant factors determining the degree of Email address for contact author: [email protected] variability in the diet of red porgy. Gray triggerfish also had a diverse South Carolina Department of Natural Resources diet, composed of 131 different prey P.O. Box 12559 taxa. Barnacles, gastropods, and Charleston, South Carolina 29422-2559 decapods were their main prey. Of the 4 explanatory variables, latitude was highly significant, and season, depth, and length were statistically significant. Red porgy and gray trig- There have been numerous calls and fisheries along the entire southeast- gerfish were observed to have a gen- mandates to adopt an ecosystem- ern U.S. Atlantic continental shelf, eralized feeding strategy of feeding opportunistically on a wide range of based approach to fisheries manage- often referred to as the South Atlan- prey. This study contains fundamen- ment (Link, 2002; Latour et al., 2003; tic Bight (SAB) (Bearden and McK- 2 tal trophic data on 2 important fish- NMFS, 2009).
    [Show full text]