DOCSLIB.ORG

Page 1 for Further Information, Contact Integrity UK On: Enquiries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Page 1 for Further Information, Contact Integrity UK On: Enquiries A B O U T I N T E G R I T Y U K Integrity UK is an organisation committed to preventing extremism through innovative approaches to promoting integration, cohesion and social reconciliation within the MENA region and the UK. S Y R I A I N T E L L I G E N C E R E P O R T 27th April 2018 On Thursday evening, the Russian-organised briefing on the chemical attack in Douma took place in the headquarters of the Organisation for the Prohibition for Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in The Hague. The briefing included presentations from Russian officials who claimed that there were no people killed or injured during the attack, there were no witnesses alleging chemical attacks taking place, and the state of the two cylinders found on the site on the attack did not fit the story of them being dropped from helicopters. The briefing also brought forward 17 witnesses, including the 11 year-old Hassan Diab who was filmed getting doused with water in the Douma hospital after the attack. Diab had subsequently told Russian media that he participated in the video for food. In the briefing, both Diab and his father told observers that they did not believe there was a chemical attack. The OPCW subsequently interviewed six of the 17 witnesses. The briefing was condemned by the United States, United Kingdom and France who described it as a “despicable stunt” and a “theatre” that misused and undermined the OPCW. Critics also noted that while Diab appeared to be doused with water as a precautionary measure despite not showing any symptoms, other videos clearly showed people suffering from after-effects such as foaming at the mouth or corneal burns. Claims and counterclaims such as these by both sides will only serve to muddle the findings further, meaning that by the time the OPCW actually publishes its findings, it will have very limited legitimacy. The US' Secretary of Defence, James Mattis, met with the Israeli Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman on Thursday evening. The meeting, which took place in the Pentagon, focused on the reports of Russian and Iranian weapons being shipped to Syria. Commenting on the reports of Russia providing the S- 300 missile systems to Syria, Mattis criticised Moscow for contributing to the fighting in the country and called for a political solution. Mattis also cited Iran as the greatest regional threat and expressed hope that a concrete step can subsequently be produced between himself and Lieberman. Mattis' words come amidst an escalating war of words between Iran and Israel over Syria. As the two defence ministers met, there were reports in the US media overnight that US satellites, surveillance aircraft, drones and ships have stepped up their activities along the Syrian coast. In conjunction, there were reports of the Syrian and Russian air defences stepping up their preparedness in anticipation of an Israeli airstrike. Amidst these developments, clashes across Syria have continued. Airstrikes on the Islamic State (IS)-held Yarmouk Refugee Camp in Damascus City paused briefly overnight as a result of the heavy rain engulfing much of the city, which resulted in the flooding of many areas. Airstrikes, as well as the push by the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) and allied militias, continued on Friday morning, with pro-Government sources announcing making gains in the al-Joura, al-Asali neighbourhoods and the 30th Street of the Hajar al-Aswad District. The SAA also pushed into the Zayn neighbourhood after the rebels in Yalda reportedly allowed the loyalist forces to cross through the district in a bid to flank the IS militants. Despite the gains by For further information, contact Integrity UK on: [email protected] the pro-Government forces, however, the IS still retains the ability to shell Damascus City, having targeted the Bayader Nader neighbourhood northwest of the Yarmouk Refugee Camp, killing one and injuring four. In northern Hama, the rebel offensive launched against the SAA in northern Hama continued overnight. In addition to the Tanzim Hurras al-Deen and the FSA-affiliated Jaish al-Izza, the attack was also joined by Jabhat Inqadh, an FSA affiliate that was formerly part of Jaish al-Nasr, and Ansar al-Tawhid, a group that was formed from the remnants of Jund al-Aqsa that did not defect to the IS. Meanwhile, some pro-Opposition sources claimed that Hayy'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) did not join the offensive. On late Thursday night, the rebels announced the capture of the village of Hamamiyat, near Kurnaz. However, it would appear that the village was lost to the SAA on Friday morning, with pro-Government fighters not only reporting the recapture of the village but also showing images of captured equipment and deceased rebel fighters. Since then, the SAA has been shelling much of northern Hama and southern Idlib, targeting the towns and villages of Kafr Nabuda, Lataminah, Kafr Zita, al-Sakhr and Morek in particular. Attacks and assassinations in the Idlib Province escalated rapidly overnight, with more than 17 people reported killed over the course of 24 hours alone. In addition to the two killings in Binnish and Ma'arat Nu'man reported yesterday, the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights (SOHR) stated the following incidents happened overnight: One person of unknown affiliation was shot in Sarmada; an official of Jaish al-Izza was assassinated last in Khan Sheikhoun and two Ansar al-Tawheed militants were found dead this morning; an official of Ahrar al-Sham (now part of Jabhat Tahrir Suriya) was attacked in Tah but survived; a security guard of Ahrar al-Sham was shot at the side of a road in Meshmashan; a non-Syrian rebel fighter for an unknown group was shot in Idlib City; a fighter of the Turkistan Islamic Party (TIP) was shot near Jisr al-Shugour; a pharmacist was shot dead in the village of Jubas; a checkpoint belonging to Faylaq al- Sham was attacked, although it remains unknown if anyone was killed; three displaced people from Zabadani and three fighters of the TIP were killed near the town of Armanaz and; most recently, the renowned Jihadist ideologue Abdullah al-Muhaysini was either shot or attacked with an IED, injured but surviving. No group has taken responsibility for the attacks, which appear to have targeted groups across the political and military spectrum, leaving little clarity as to whether they may be coordinated. The Idlib City council has ordered a night curfew for three days in response to the crisis. There were also reports of an assassination taking place in northern Aleppo where pro-Opposition sources claimed that the insurgent group Harakat al-Qiyam killed Abu Ali Barad, the leader of Jaish al- Thuwar, one of the few FSA-affiliated factions of the People’s Protection Units (YPG). The attack has not yet been confirmed and the group has not announced his death on social media so far. There were also reports of a series of clashes in southern Syria on Friday. The FSA-affiliated Lions of the Golan Division reported skirmishes with pro-Government militias near the town of Awfania in the northern Quneitra countryside. There were also reports of the FSA near the Yarmouk Basin engaging in skirmishes with the IS-affiliated Jaish Khalid Ibn al-Walid near the towns of Hayt and Bakar. No gains or losses were reported in either attack. In Deir ez-Zour, pro-Government sources reported that the SAA pushed further into the IS pocket in the Syrian Deser, reporting the capture of the Hasyan area along the southeastern edges of the militant territory. Pro-Government sources also reported on Friday morning that unknown persons have raised the flags of the Syrian Government in the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF)-held village of al-Hamam, southwest of Raqqa City. No group or individual claimed the raising of the flag, but it was likely conducted by the Popular Resistance in the Eastern Regions, the pro-Government insurgent group which claimed a similar operation in Raqqa City. For further information, contact Integrity UK on: [email protected] .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • About Syrians for Truth and Justice
    Bombardment with Incendiary Substances Damages and Burns Agricultural Crops in Hama About Syrians for Truth and Justice Syrians for Truth and Justice (STJ) is an independent, non-governmental and non-profit organization whose members include Syrian human rights defenders, advocates and academics of different backgrounds and nationalities. It also includes members of other nationalities. The initiative strives for SYRIA, where all Syrian citizens (males and females) have dignity, equality, justice and equal human rights. 1 Bombardment with Incendiary Substances Damages and Burns Agricultural Crops in Hama Bombardment with Incendiary Substances Damages and Burns Agricultural Crops in Northern Hama Countryside April and May 2018 Witness the Damage of the Yearly Harvest in Cities and Towns of Ltamenah, Kafr Zita, Latmeen by Syrian Regular Forces 2 Bombardment with Incendiary Substances Damages and Burns Agricultural Crops in Hama Introduction Syrian regular forces and their allies continue their military escalation in the northern countryside of Hama in May 2018, but a large portion of the shelling this time affected the agricultural land that people rely on as the main source of livelihood. According to many eyewitnesses and testimonies of the locals in those areas, the Syrian regular forces have escalated their bombardment on the agricultural land located in the towns and cities of Ltamenah and Kafr Zita, Latmeen and Kafr Nbudah1 since April 2018, and targeted them with various types of weapons, most notably incendiary substances. The bombardment coincided with the annual date of harvest, thus destroying and damaging a large number of agricultural crops. According to the field researcher of STJ, the northern countryside of Hama is one of the most cultivated areas in Syria because it invests more than 40% from its land in agriculture, plus 62% of the region's locals work in this field.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Testimonies from Victims of the Syrian Conflict
    A/HRC/27/CRP.1 Advance Version Distr.: Restricted 16 September 2014 English only Human Rights Council Twenty-seventh session Agenda item 4 Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention Selected testimonies from victims of the Syrian conflict GE.14- A/HRC/27/CRP.1 I. Introduction 1. The ongoing armed conflict in the Syrian Arab Republic has caused death and destruction on a massive scale. The commission’s reports, updates, thematic papers and speeches have chronicled violations and abuses of international human rights and humanitarian law by all warring parties and the immense human suffering that these violations have caused. The commission is presenting, with their consent, twelve selected testimonies from victims of egregious violations. These testimonies are a public recognition of victims’ suffering and the harm caused to them by parties to the conflict. They serve as an acknowledgement of the facts and as a tribute to the victims. 1 2. In the present document, victims are persons who suffered harm, including physical or mental injury, emotional suffering, economic loss or substantial impairment of their fundamental rights, through acts or omissions that constitute gross violations of international human rights law, or serious violations of international humanitarian law. Victims also include immediate family or dependants of the direct victim and persons who have suffered harm in reprisal for intervening to assist victims in distress. 3. Exposing victim’s voices guarantees the preservation of memory and serves as a vital safeguard against the recurrence of violations. Victims, their families and their societies have the imprescriptible right to know the truth about the circumstances in which violations took place and the victims’ fate.
    [Show full text]
  • SYRIA, FIRST HALFYEAR 2019: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 19 December 2019
    SYRIA, FIRST HALFYEAR 2019: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 19 December 2019 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; incid- ent data: ACLED, 14 December 2019; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, FIRST HALFYEAR 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 19 DECEMBER 2019 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 7110 925 3048 violence Development of conflict incidents from June 2017 to June 2019 2 Battles 1282 659 4216 Strategic developments 602 9 20 Methodology 3 Violence against civilians 527 339 658 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 110 1 5 Riots 12 1 1 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 9643 1934 7948 Disclaimer 8 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 14 December 2019). Development of conflict incidents from June 2017 to June 2019 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 14 December 2019). 2 SYRIA, FIRST HALFYEAR 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 19 DECEMBER 2019 Methodology on what level of detail is reported. Thus, towns may represent the wider region in which an incident occured, or the provincial capital may be used if only the province The data used in this report was collected by the Armed Conflict Location & Event is known.
    [Show full text]
  • Syria, Second Quarter 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project
    SYRIA, SECOND QUARTER 2020: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 28 October 2020 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; in- cident data: ACLED, 3 October 2020; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, SECOND QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 28 OCTOBER 2020 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 1051 193 496 violence Development of conflict incidents from June 2018 to June 2020 2 Strategic developments 439 1 1 Battles 415 203 760 Methodology 3 Violence against civilians 326 223 283 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 131 2 4 Riots 20 2 11 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 2382 624 1555 Disclaimer 7 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 3 October 2020). Development of conflict incidents from June 2018 to June 2020 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 3 October 2020). 2 SYRIA, SECOND QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 28 OCTOBER 2020 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
    [Show full text]
  • Hama Northern Countryside the Loss of Crops in 2019 As a Result of Bombing and Invasion
    Hama northern countryside The loss of crops in 2019 as a result of bombing and invasion The residents of Sahl al-Ghab plain in the northern countryside of Hama were eagerly awaiting the arrival of June, to harvest their crops. This year was characterized by heavy rains; a good sign for a bountiful harvest, and better than previous years where there had been less rain and weak agricultural and animal production. The necessity of this season is apparent as it helps people meet their livelihood needs, especially in these difficult times characterized by conflict and repeated displacements, as people flee out of fear of their lives and that of their children. While the farmers were waiting to harvest their crops, they were surprised by an increase in the frequency of shelling by warplanes, helicopters, artillery, and rockets in the area. The Sahl al-Ghab and northern Hama countryside, which were once liberated from the regime forces are now subject to invasion. This report highlights the damage to agricultural land and the physical condition of the civilian caused by the deliberate shelling of agricultural land in Sahl al-Ghab and northern Hama countryside areas. Sahl al Gab Sahl al Gab is a flat and fertile geographic plain located between the mountains of Lattakia in the west and the mountains of Zawya and Salhab in the east, and between the city of Jisr al-Shughour in the north and Tal Salhab in the south. This area is one of the most fertile plains in Syria, supported by the Orontes river that passes from south to north.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq Jordan Lebanon
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !( ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! A`jaz Abu Rasm al ! Al Falu Kibar ! Babinna ! Dayr ! ! ! Tall Zahr al Hassef Ma`arr ! Suqay`ah Tall al Burtuqanah `Ajal ! ! ! ! Ba!b ! ! Kafr ! Ma`arratah ! ! As Sayyadi ! ! ! ! At Tibni ! ! ! ! ! 36°15'0"E ! ! Al Halluba F36a°ti3ra0h'0"E ! ! 36°45'0"E ! ! 37°0'0"E Al M3a7l°ih1a5h'0"E 37°30'0"E 37°45'0"E 38°0'0"E 38°15'0"E 38°30'0"E Bi'r as 38°45'0"E 39°0'0"E 39°15'0"E 39°30'0"E 39°45'0"E ! Kubar 40°0'0"E 40°15'0"E ! ! ! ! ! `Ayn Mabtuhah ! Kabir Surman Tuhayjah `Awja' al Kibar al Humr ! ! Tuma `Abd Allah ! ! Dayr al! Shamarin Jarjanaz ! ! `Uwayjat ! ! ! ! Safawhun Nabl Marah ! Abu Kafrayya ! Jahman ! Jubb al ! ! Zahr ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As Sat Abu ! Al Khiyarah Gharbiyah ! Umm Tall ash Abu !Sadrani ! ! !( ! ! ! Rayhaniyah ! Sfawhun Hazzarin Gharbi ! Jinah ! ! ! ! B! irin Katliyah ! ! `Ankawi ! ! Bisaqla ! Dayr ash Makki Umm ! ! Abyad Kamba Harmushiyah ! ! ! ! ! Al Ghazal Mazra`at al ! ! Qarati ! Sharji Suray`ah Tamakh Shur Khanadiq ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Fulayfil Mallajah Dar Ma`arr ! ! Sarjah ! ! Mushayrifah ! ! ! Sharqi Kuraysantah ! Sinjar ! Buwaytiyah ! ! Al Ha!ffah Ard al! `Ayn W!usta ! Al Burj Ha!lahil Sraa Duwadiyah Rasm al ! ! ! Bab Jannah ! !! A!s Safa ! ! Jibala Ma`arr ! Hitat ! Tall Taldum ! ! ! ! D!afil ! ! Kirs! ! ! ! !Kawkabah
    [Show full text]
  • Syria, First Quarter 2018: Update on Incidents According to the Armed
    SYRIA, FIRST QUARTER 2018: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) - Updated 2nd edition compiled by ACCORD, 20 December 2018 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; incid- ent data: ACLED, 15 December 2018; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, FIRST QUARTER 2018: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) - UPDATED 2ND EDITION COMPILED BY ACCORD, 20 DECEMBER 2018 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Remote violence 5112 1064 5281 Conflict incidents by category 2 Battles 1860 610 5825 Development of conflict incidents from January 2017 to March 2018 2 Strategic developments 183 1 7 Non-violent activities 137 0 0 Methodology 3 Violence against civilians 106 81 155 Conflict incidents per province 4 Headquarters established 60 0 0 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Riots/protests 54 0 0 Total 7512 1756 11268 Disclaimer 9 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 15 December 2018). Development of conflict incidents from January 2017 to March 2018 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 15 December 2018). 2 SYRIA, FIRST QUARTER 2018: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) - UPDATED 2ND EDITION COMPILED BY ACCORD, 20 DECEMBER 2018 Methodology Geographic map data is primarily based on GADM, complemented with other sources if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Hama Governorate Jordan Website: Global Logistics Cluster Support Cell, Rome/Italy
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 36°0'0"NYoncakaya ! Darah ash ! Taftanaz Ash ! Jumaynah Kafr Kafr Haklah Shu`bat Bi'r Hammud36°0'0"N Karbeyaz ! Beydonlu Dok Khyuseynli ! Tall ! ! 36°15'0"E ! Darkush Amtaqqa 36°30'0"!E ! 36°45'0"E 37°0'0"E 37°15'0"E ! Hubashiyah 37°30'0"E 37°45'0"E 38°0'0"E ! Rasm al 38°15'0"E Khazum Ayisigi ! ! Ruwaysat ! ! Sharqi Al `Awja Kafraya Shaykh Al Hadir Ibbin `Akkar ! ! Maskanah ! al Yusuf ! ! ! Yoncakaya Yigityolu ! ! Darah al ! ! Jubb Hadiyah ! ! Jawar al ! Tall Musaydah ! Dirriyah Firik ! Kharab ! Ghazal Sakrak Duwaysat Kita Ash Al Qunaytirah! Kafr Umm `Isa Maryamayn Kafr Jihash Banin Tall H!u Zayman `Annazah Junayd As Samumah Hardanah ! Khirbat Ash ! ! Gharbi ! !Fu`ah Ka's ! ! ! ! ! ! Mas`udiyah ! ! ! Ucirmak JurayjiyahD! ayr Khalil Murin Ba`ibah ! ! ! ! Umm Mushayrifah ! Khashkhashah ! Kabta Shaykh ! Jalis `Atabah Rasm as Banis ! Subayhiyah Hamah `Abid Ja`arah Madinah Mazra`at ! ! al `Amud Shaykh Basiliya ! ! ! Salhab! ! Ishman ! ! Tu`um Mashrafat Banan Abu `Amud Raddat al Meric Kilictutan ! Yusuf Ad Duwayr ! Ash Shaykh ! Rasm Saharij ! !Al Ghari !Shirmaq ! ! ! Omerli ! Dayr! Al `Amud `Isa Az Za!hr Bura! ! ! Muntar ! ! ! ! ! ! Tayzir Tulaylat al Hallaj ! Aachte Kabirah Shanhasah Rifatli Erbasi Bublin `Arshani `Ali al ! Talhiyah Abu Shaykh al `Is ! ! ! ! Tah ! ! ! Kislak ! ! Farjin Az Zahr Basiliya ! ! Judaydah ! ! `!Uthman Al Hamidiyah Hawa'ij Batirhan!!Kuyubasi ! Mar`u Magharat at Tahtani! Kurdi Kansah Ahmad ! Sarj Asagi
    [Show full text]
  • Aleppo Governorate Jordan Website: Global Logistics Cluster Support Cell, Rome/Italy
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !( ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yagizlar ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kyuchyuk-Ova ! Acemi ! Ucgoz ! Kullu Karagoz ! ! ! Miskizan ! Sulumagara Leckenari Hamuso Madenevi Dervisler Haclar Yukaribademli Kozlubag Ugurtepe Kurum Burckarakuyu Kefersih Bozalioglu Intepe Elifoglu Kirkiz ! Tilmenur Holik ! Fistikli Tuzeken ! ! Yeniyapan ! Hicek ! Uluduz ! Kyuchyuk-Agadzhi Burcukevtan Agviran Shumeyte ! Otekioba Yukarikalecik Gyullyudzhe ! Geneyik Kurucahuyuk ! ! ! ! ! Uvecik !Ziyaret ! Kantara ! 36°30'T0e"Esbi 36°45'0"E Cinarli 37°0'0"E ! Coreklik 37°15'0"E ! 37°30'0"E A3tb7a°4ti5ra'0n"E ! 38°0'0"E 38°15'0"E ! Koroglu! 38°30'0"E ! 38°45'0"E ! Parapara Asagi ! ! ! ! Kalaycik ! Burunsuzlar ! ! Kucuk Sazgin ! ! ! Tokcali ! Buyukziyaret Asagi Yaylasi Kurna Tahtalikaradut ! ! Kale Koy Koyu ! Guvenir Kesmecik Gommekuyu Asagicemgok Haciosma!n ! Tirkak ! Devdev Ozanlar ! Kyurtyundzhyu Sabanli Yarimtepe Karakiz ! Yildiz Kap! ici ! ! Kaplankoy Budikyan ! Nachar Kayabasi Zerdik Haskanli ! ! Cevizli Cilcime Karasakal Masara ! Cakmaktepe Mihrap Kepirler Savi ! Kyuchyuk-Kindzhirli ! ! ! ! Mesik !! ! ! ! Yukari ! Ortakli ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Byugdyuz Tinazdere ! ! Mercanli ! ! ! ! Biris ! ! Balaban ! Dobalak! Binatli !Hasankullek Hemedan Harbetelrecep ! ! ! ! Pisikler ! Yagdoven ! ! ! Karaca Topalak
    [Show full text]
  • SYRIA, YEAR 2019: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 23 June 2020
    SYRIA, YEAR 2019: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 23 June 2020 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; in- cident data: ACLED, 20 June 2020; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, YEAR 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 23 JUNE 2020 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 13672 1753 5751 violence Development of conflict incidents from 2017 to 2019 2 Battles 2814 1344 8296 Strategic developments 1348 19 37 Methodology 3 Violence against civilians 1167 724 1169 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 331 2 14 Riots 25 3 5 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 19357 3845 15272 Disclaimer 9 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 20 June 2020). Development of conflict incidents from 2017 to 2019 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 20 June 2020). 2 SYRIA, YEAR 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 23 JUNE 2020 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
    [Show full text]
  • SYRIA, THIRD QUARTER 2019: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 26 February 2020
    SYRIA, THIRD QUARTER 2019: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 26 February 2020 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; incid- ent data: ACLED, 22 February 2020; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, THIRD QUARTER 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 26 FEBRUARY 2020 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 3504 431 1447 violence Development of conflict incidents from September 2017 to September Battles 509 271 1869 2019 2 Violence against civilians 313 175 206 Strategic developments 217 4 7 Methodology 3 Protests 52 0 0 Conflict incidents per province 4 Riots 5 1 3 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 4600 882 3532 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 22 February 2020). Disclaimer 7 Development of conflict incidents from September 2017 to September 2019 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 22 February 2020). 2 SYRIA, THIRD QUARTER 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 26 FEBRUARY 2020 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary-Of-Consultation-Results.Pdf
    1 Contents Summary of consultation results ...................................................................................................... 5 Besieged areas..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Suggested solutions ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Detainees ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Suggested solutions ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Shelling ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Suggested solutions ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 The Syrian Civil Society Platform .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]