“Trust Me, I'm Almost a Doctor”: the Ethics of Calling Oneself An

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Trust Me, I'm Almost a Doctor”: the Ethics of Calling Oneself An 38 Medical Ethics Volume 4 No. 1, 2007 MEDICAL ETHICS “Trust me, I’m almost a doctor”: The Ethics of Calling Oneself an (Almost) Physician Renée A. Beach, BSc ntroductions mark the beginning of most verbal uncomfortable one. It raises the following questions : 1) Is it interactions. By convention, an individual initiates a ever acceptable to ignore the fact that a medical student (who professional exchange by declaring her name, title and will soon be a doctor and who bears some of the responsibilities affiliation. In medicine, this truism is no different. Physician- of an actual doctor) is not in fact an actual doctor? and 2) Does Ipatient exchanges often begin with a greeting; the physician the term ‘student-doctor’ mislead the patient public by identifies her name and her title or role within the given clinical suggesting that the student is a licensed physician? After situation. It is a simple collection of words; however, when considering various arguments from different perspectives, done well, the introduction sets the climate for subsequent, what is “acceptable” may not be as obvious as it first seems. appropriate interaction. Given the complex nature of many of GUIDING ETHICAL PRINCIPLES the issues physicians must explain to their patients, this ability to communicate effectively, from the onset of physician-patient There are certain core ethical principles by which physicians interaction, is paramount. However, there are instances in and other healthcare professionals abide. For many, these which an introduction can, unintentionally, cause confusion or principles were first introduced as a component of formal outright anxiety. medical education. These include the principles of autonomy, Within the context of a clinical scenario presented below, beneficence or non-malfeasance, and justice. 3 Before tackling this article will examine the ethics involved in the introduction the questions raised above, it is useful to understand these core of a medical student to a patient in the clinical setting. In ethical principles. particular, this article will scrutinize the appropriateness of Autonomy refers to a patient’s ability to guide his own identifying a medical student to a patient as a “doctor”. treatment, to adjust the treatment course according to his desires. In order to promote a favourable outcome, the THE SCENARIO physician weighs the pros and cons of a given decision, and Imagine the following scenario: You, a clinical clerk*, have presents these to the patient who ideally, as the autonomous been assigned to the clinical team of a resident doctor** for the individual, directs the eventual course of action. By attending to duration of your internal medicine rotation. 1,2 It is your first a patient’s well-being, a physician is performing beneficence. evening on-call. Upon entering the room of a newly-admitted Non-malfeasance refers to adopting the action that is least patient to whom you have been assigned, the resident likely to harm the patient, once potential benefits have been introduces herself first, including the title of “Dr.” before her assessed. Finally, the principle of justice simply asks whether or surname. She then turns, gestures towards you, and introduces not the choice of intervention is fair for the patient involved. In you as “Dr.” as well. Immediately, you feel alarmed by this and some instances, the wishes of the patient’s close contacts may attempt to amend her statement, sheepishly adding, “Actually, also be considered in determining the fairness of a particular I’m a student-doctor”. The patient looks at you blankly. Clearly, course of action . your attempt at clarification has produced confusion. APPLYING ETHICAL CONCEPTS TO SCENARIO For those who have been students or apprentices in various disciplines, this scenario may be a very familiar and , perhaps , In the scenario above, the patient was initially told that the clerk and the resident were both “Dr.’s”. This inevitably leaves the patient with the impression that both healthcare providers * Clinical Clerks are considered senior medical students. They are in the latter share equal status with respect to hospital responsibility, half of undergraduate medical education which consists of rotations in privilege and clinical knowledge. Did this threaten the patient’s disciplines within the hospital (clinical) setting, supervised primarily by Resident physicians and Staff physicians. autonomy? ** Resident Doctors, or post-graduate clinical trainees, are those who have Part of patient autonomy includes the patient having graduated medical school and earned a degree in medicine, and are knowledge of who is assessing her. The use of the title “Dr.” continuing in specialist education, including family medicine. during an assessment is a direct indication of the healthcare MUMJ Medical Ethics 39 practitioner’s level of expertise and training. Perhaps this convenience, to present a student as a physician in order to patient would decline a physical examination performed by an facilitate clinical practice. However, a patient’s safety should “amateur” student, or perhaps she would have been delighted to never be compromised for the sake of a learning experience. aid in the student’s learning. Regardless, the ability to choose By the same token, however, when a patient is examined by based on fulsome information has been stripped from the various members of the medical team, there may be a greater patient when both individuals were presented as equally adept yield of findings which can potentially enhance patient care. colleagues according to the shared title of “Dr.” 4 In subsequent Even with the utilitarian, practical advantage of furthering interactions, the confidence and trust placed in the clerk by the student education, a moral dilemma exists once the student is patient may be attributed directly to the belief that the clerk is a labelled “physician”. In reality, the clerk in question lacks both full-fledged physician. In turn, any consent granted by the a recognized medical degree, as well as a practicing license patient based on these beliefs is misguided. granted by a governing body. 1 Thus, the clerk is officially not a Theoretically, however, it may be argued that this tactic may doctor. The utilitarian argument, in effect, legitimizes taking not violate a patient’s autonomy. If the clerk physically shortcuts in the interests of expediency, rather than being examines the patient without providing medical advice or completely forthcoming. For the student who glosses over information, she is still acting within her duties as a details today, what might he gloss over, or completely student. Once the resident physician has provided authority to misrepresent tomorrow? The concern that one falsehood will the clerk to relay advice and information, the clerk’s actions are lead to others could eventually compromise a patient’s health arguably guided by an actual physician. Because the clerk is and erode the ethics of a future physician. acting as the doctor’s spokesperson, the same medical While it may be difficult for individuals outside of the information is relayed to the patient, allowing the patient to healthcare community to fathom why one would accept or make the same informed decision regarding his management. apply a label which may misrepresent their professional rank, The clerk then becomes an essential communication link for a student to be bestowed with the title of “doctor”, even between the patient and the attending physician, without momentarily, it can provide a great sense of importance and jeopardizing the patient’s autonomy. esteem. Acceptance of this label can even encourage the student There are also certain instances in which a lack of explicit to strive for the intellectual capacity and professional standard communication does not impair patient-professional of the physician during their apprenticeship. It is also an interaction. The lack of introductory detail in the scenario may, indication that one has been deemed professionally competent initially, place the patient at ease because she is able to assign a by his superior. This judgment is particularly significant to the familiar title to both new visitors. While this perception may be apprenticing student, who may lack direct, consistent presumptuous, there are individuals who would prefer not to be evaluation of their abilities. It is also a sign of collegiality overloaded with information. For this subset of patients, the between the ranks of medicine, which can be rare in a utmost concern is their current health status, not the protocol for profession traditionally obsessed with hierarchy .5 who will take care of them. Upon observing the patient’s In the scenario above, upon being introduced as “Dr.”, the preference, the physician would actually practice beneficence clerk attempts to clarify the introduction by describing herself and avoid the induction of harm . For the resident and clerk, the as a “student-doctor”. Doing so elicits a blank stare of tedious nature of explaining the various ranks and roles within confusion from the patient. In the scenario, it was not the initial the medical system, which may be irrelevant to this particular introduction which caused the patient to become perplexed, but patient, has been circumvented. There is the sentiment that “all the commission of introducing oneself with two seemingly sides win” with this approach. conflicting terms, “student” and “doctor”. Although combining It may be argued that justice was circumvented by the these titles may seem like a concise way of explaining one’s resident in the above scenario. The resident did not disclose the role, it is actually a form of short-hand that is too often used (in exact nature of the accompanying student as that of a clinical this author’s experience) and unnecessary, and may actually clerk, or non-physician . In the setting of a simple introductory lead to confusion. Instead of describing oneself as a “student- meeting where there was no clinical decision at hand, or risk of doctor”, the clerk should introduce herself as a “student-who-is- imminent injury to the patient , it is possible that her action currently-training-to-be-a-doctor”.
Recommended publications
  • Gisela Januszewska (Née Rosenfeld), an Austro-Hungarian 'Woman
    Historical Article Narrative Review Acta Medica Academica 2020;49(1):75-83 DOI: 10.5644/ama2006-124.287 Gisela Januszewska (née Rosenfeld), an Austro-Hungarian ‘Woman Doctor for Women’ in Banjaluka, 1899–1912 Brigitte Fuchs1, Husref Tahirović2 1Department of International Development at the University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2Department of Medical Sciences of the Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: + 43 650 640 5150; Fax.: + 43 1 4277 495 33 and [email protected]; Tel./Fax.: + 387 35 303 740 Received: 31 March 2020; Accepted: 30 April 2020 The focus of this article is on the biography and medical activity of Gisela Januszewska (née Rosenfeld) in Austro-Hungarian (AH) occupied Bosnia and Herzegovina (BH) between 1899 and 1912. Rosenfeld, later Januszewska and then Kuhn(ová) by marriage, was the fifth of a total of nine official female physicians who were employed by the AH administration to improve the health and hygienic conditions among Bosnian and Bosnian Muslim women. In 1893, Gisela Kuhn moved from Brno, Moravia to Switzerland to pursue her medical studies; she was awarded her Doctorate in Medicine (MD) from the University of Zurich in 1898. In the same year, she took up her first position as a local health insurance doctor for women and children in Remscheid but was prohibited from practising in the German Empire. In 1899, she successfully applied to the AH authorities for the newly established position of a female health officer in Banjaluka and began working there in July 1899.
    [Show full text]
  • AAAA Statement on Clinical Doctorate Degrees
    AAAA Statement on Clinical Doctorate Degrees The American Academy of Anesthesiologist Assistants is dedicated to maintaining the standards of the profession and the specialty by remaining current with the ongoing changes and emerging needs in health care delivery while promoting the safety and upholding the rights of all patients undergoing medical treatment involving an anesthesia provider. A recent proliferation of entry-level clinical doctorate degrees into the educational models of non-physician providers has caused a commensurate increase in the use of the title “doctor” in the healthcare system. Inappropriately, the title "resident" and "doctor" has been used in the clinical setting by students and graduates of these programs despite their non-physician status. This trend is a recognized source of potential confusion for patients concerning their medical care and has potential negative implications with respect to scope of practice infringement and conflict of interest, decreased professional diversity, increased health care costs, and aggravation of provider shortages. The AAAA believes that the practice of medicine remains the domain of physicians and that the entry-level doctorate degree for the practice of medicine is the MD/DO. Physicians are integral members and leaders of the health care team. In the interest of patient safety, Anesthesiologist Assistants practice exclusively in, promote, and are dedicated to the Anesthesia Care Team as defined by the AAAA and ASA. The AAAA is committed to instilling confidence in the public by encouraging practitioners to adhere to established ethical norms and regional legal constraints. Furthermore, we believe in optimizing the use of all provider resources to deliver health care to everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • The Professional Doctorate: What Are We Waiting For?
    FROM THE PA EDITOR-IN-CHIEF The Professional Doctorate: What Are We Waiting for? he increasingly complex health care it matured from the “first-generation” con- system in the United States relies cept (which was quite similar to the PhD in T heavily on quality improvement, in- structure) to “second-generation,” which is terprofessional collaboration, patient out- more focused on discipline and workplace comes, health policy legislation, and advo- realities.3,5 In general, these professional cacy. While important, most of these factors doctorates can be earned in less time are outside the scope of the traditional mas- than a PhD and do not require original ter’s-level education program—necessitat- research. ing the development of methods to help Over the past two decades, more than advanced practice providers, including NPs 500 unique professional practice doc- Randy D. Danielsen, and PAs, obtain additional skills. The solu- torate programs have emerged across PhD, PA, DFAAPA tion of choice, for many professions, has the US, in fields ranging from nursing to been the introduction of the “professional bioethics. One of the most prominent is doctorate” as a complementary alternative the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), to the typical research-focused doctoral designed for RNs seeking a post-profes- program, such as the PhD. sional degree in nursing. In 2004, follow- Traditional PhD curricula prepare in- ing three years of research by a task force, dividuals to perform re- the American Associa- search that is typically tion of Colleges of Nursing specialized and confined To be recognized (AACN) endorsed the DNP, to their field of study.1 as a full professional, with the goal that it would While this research does one must be equipped become the minimum produce new knowledge, educational standard for it usually remains in the to address practical advanced practice nurses realm of academia and problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Resume Mistakes
    Application Materials Common Resume Mistakes 1. Using Funky Fonts, Colored Paper or Graphics Be conservative in your format. Law is still a fairly conservative profession. Employers may look negatively at your attempt to catch their attention. 2. Using a Font Size That’s Too Small You don’t want your intended audience to have to squint to read your resume. Use 12 pt., 11.5 or 11 pt. font. In some cases you can get away with a 10.5 but avoid it if you can. 3. Multiple-Page Resumes In general, you should keep your resume to one page. Having a lot of experience is a good thing. However, you should always trim your experiences to the ones most relevant to the potential employer. Some special situations require a two-page resume but this is the exception rather than the rule. Hints to getting your resume to one page: ! Trim honors and awards not relevant to legal employers – use the title “Selected Honors” ! Get rid of the Interest Section of the resume if your activities section serves the same purpose of giving some insight into who you are ! Do not list duties you had during jobs legal employers might not find relevant ! Do not list jobs legal employers might not find relevant. This is not a job history. ! Merge Volunteer activities into either Experience or Honors/Activities ! Expand your margins to .8 on top and bottom ! Decrease the size of the spaces between items but not the actual font used for the text. For example, you can make a .4 or .6 space which gives the illusion of a full 10 point space 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Awarding of Honorary Degrees
    Guidelines for the Awarding of Honorary Degrees Preamble By awarding honorary degrees, the University recognizes those individuals whose accomplishments are of such excellence that they provide inspiration and leadership to its graduates. As well, through its choice of honorary degree recipients, the University makes a public declaration of its values. In selecting candidates, the University should attempt to choose individuals of such a calibre that in honouring them, it too is honoured. The Honorary Degrees and Convocations Committee should attempt, through its recommendations of nominees, to reflect the cultural diversity of the country and the international character and diversity of the University itself. It should also attempt to honour those whose outstanding contributions to their fields or to society have not yet been widely recognized. I. General Policies 1. Eligibility and Exclusions Canadians and non-Canadians may be considered for honorary degrees. Generally speaking, active or newly retired members of staff, voting members of the Board of Governors, and Canadian politicians currently in office should not be considered for honorary degrees. Normally, honorary degrees are not awarded posthumously or in absentia. 2. Criteria Some of the factors to be considered by the Committee in its deliberations are: (a) Accomplishments of Note These accomplishments could include scholarly distinction and outstanding contributions to the creative or performing arts. (b) Service to the Community at Large or to a Profession or Discipline This service could include outstanding achievements in the area of public service at the national or international levels, at the local or community level, or to a profession or discipline. (c) Appropriateness to a Special Anniversary This could include the centenary of a school or faculty or a like event.
    [Show full text]
  • Practitioner Acronym Table
    Practitioner Acronym Table AAP American Academy of Pediatrics ABAI American Board of Allergy and Immunology ABFP American Board of Family Practitioners ABO American Board of Otolaryngology ABPN American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology AK Acupuncturist (Pennsylvania) AOBFP American Osteopathic Board of Family Physicians American Osteopathic Board of Special Proficiency in Osteopathic Manipulative AOBSPOMM Medicine AP Acupuncture Physician ASG Affiliated Study Group BHMS Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery BSN Bachelor of Science, Nursing BVScAH Bachelor of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry CA Certified Acupuncturist CAAPM Clinical Associate of the American Academy of Pain Management CAC Certified Animal Chiropractor CCH Certified in Classical Homeopathy CCSP Certified Chiropractic Sports Physician CRNP Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner CRRN Certified Rehabilitation Registered Nurse CSPOMM Certified Specialty of Proficiency in Osteopathic Manipulation Medicine CVA Certified Veterinary Acupuncturist DAAPM Diplomate of American Academy of Pain Management DABFP Diplomate of the American Board of Family Practice DABIM Diplomate of the American Board of Internal Medicine DAc Diplomate in Acupuncture DAc (RI) Doctor of Acupuncture, Rhode Island DAc (WV) Doctor of Acupuncture, West Virginia DACBN Diplomate of American Chiropractic Board of Nutrition DACVD Diplomate of the American College of Veterinary Dermatology DC Doctor of Chiropractic DDS Doctor of Dentistry DHANP Diplomate of the Homeopathic Academy of Naturopathic
    [Show full text]
  • CGS Task Force Report on the Professional Doctorate
    CGS Task Force Report on the Professional Doctorate COUNCIL OF GRADUATE SCHOOLS CGS Task Force on the Professional Doctorate Carol Lynch, Co-Chair CGSINSF Dean in Residence Clark Hulse, Co-Chair Dean of the Graduate College, Executive Vice Provost, University of Illinois at Chicago Richard Attiyeh Vice Chancellor for Research and Dean of Graduate Studies, University of California, San Diego Robin Bowen Interim Dean, School of Graduate and Professional Studies, Rockhurst University Martin Cadwallader Vice Chancellor, Research and Dean of the Graduate School, University of Wisconsin-Madison Linda Dykstra Dean, The Graduate School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School, University of Georgia Daniel Denecke CGS Managing Editor Copyright © 2007 Council of Graduate Schools, Washington, D.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright herein may be reproduced or used in any fonn by any means-graphic, electronic, or mechanical including photocopying, recording, taping, Web distribution, or information storage and retrieval systems-without the written permission of the Council of Graduate Schools, One Dupont Circle, NW, Suite 430, Washington, D.C. 20036-1173. ISBN 10: 1-933042-11-7 ISBN 13: 978-1-933042-11-4 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 08 07 TABLE OF CONTENTS ••• 4 •••••••••••••••• _••••• ~ f ~ ••••••• ~ ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• . .. " ......... ~ ......................... ',' ...... , ..... ~ ............................. Executive Summary . • . • . iv Foreword
    [Show full text]
  • Are Courses for the JM Degree Taught by the Same Professors Who Teach Courses for the Juris Doctor Degree?
    Why choose Emory Law? Emory Law is a top-ranked law school offering a practical, disciplined approach to the study of law. We are known for: • faculty who are experts in their respective areas of law and dynamic teachers in the classroom • a rigorous curriculum attuned to the needs of the legal profession • countless opportunities for experiential learning through externships, clinics, and simulation course • an environment of support and cooperation that encourages challenging the status quo Are courses for the JM degree taught by the same professors who teach courses for the Juris Doctor degree? The same professors and industry professionals teach all JM courses. More than 60 full-time faculty, along with our adjunct faculty, teach more than 250 courses at Emory Law. Their focus on research means they are not only teaching you the law, they are also actively participating in shaping laws around the world. What is the difference between a Juris Doctor (JD), a Juris Master (JM), and a paralegal degree? A JD degree is a 90-credit-hour degree, also known as a Doctor of Jurisprudence, which prepares students to sit for the Bar Exam and practice law. A JM degree is a 30-credit-hour master’s degree in law. It is intended for individuals who want to learn the laws that govern their profession. JM recipients are not eligible to practice law. No legal standards exist for paralegal education and training requirements. It is not a master’s degree. A paralegal cannot practice law. Can I practice law with a JM degree? No, you cannot practice law with a JM degree.
    [Show full text]
  • The Health Workforce in India
    THE HEALTH WORKFORCE IN INDIA Human Resources for Health Observer Series No. 16 Sudhir Anand and Victoria Fan THE HEALTH WORKFORCE IN INDIA Human Resources for Health Observer Series No. 16 Sudhir Anand and Victoria Fan WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data The health workforce in India. I.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 151052 3 Subject headings are available from WHO institutional repository © World Health Organization 2016 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO website (http://www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications –whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution– should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO website (http://www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/index.html). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan of Study for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.Pdf
    233 Glenbrook Road, U-4077 Storrs, CT 06269-4077 UCONN Phone: 860-486-3331 Fax: 860-486-0062 OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR Email: [email protected] Plan of Study for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Name: Last First Middle Initial Student ID: and/or NetID: Phone: Email address: This plan of study should be completed and submitted to the Office of the Registrar when not more than 18 credits of course work to be offered for the degree have been completed. The successful completion of all work indicated on the plan of study is a fundamental prerequisite for the conferring of the degree. The plan of study must be signed by the student and by each member of the advisory committee before submission to the Office of the Registrar for final approval. When fully approved, copies of the plan of study are scanned and e-mailed to the student, major advisor, and department administrator. Any request for changes should be submitted to the Office of the Registrar for approval on the ''Request for Changes in Plan of Study'' form. Degree and Professional Diplomas held at present COLLEGE DEGREE DATE GRANTED FIELD OF STUDY Field of Doctoral Study: Area of Concentration: Advisory Committee (print names only, minimum of three required) MAJOR ADVISOR ASSOCIATE ADVISOR ASSOCIATE ADVISOR ASSOCIATE ADVISOR ASSOCIATE ADVISOR ASSOCIATE ADVISOR LEAVE BLANK Date of PhD admission: Date by which all requirements for degree must be completed: UC NN UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT registrar.uconn.edu 233 Glenbrook Road, U-4077 Storrs, CT 06269-4077 UCONN Phone: 860-486-3331 Fax: 860-486-0062 OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR Email: [email protected] Course Work List below all courses to fulfill the requirements for the PhD degree after consultation with your major advisor.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbreviations Academic Degrees
    Style Guide for USC Communications (Revised on 4/9/13) Abbreviations Acronyms may be used on second reference but try to use “the center,” “the institute” or simply a shortened version of the center or institute’s name if possible. Example: Sandy made a donation to the USC Shoah Foundation — The Institute for Visual History and Education. At the institute’s annual gala, she was honored with the Donor of the Year award. Academic Degrees Academic degrees should be written without periods: BA, MA, MSW, PhD, EdD, PharmD Examples: She received her BA from the USC Gould School of Law. Jane Doe MA ’12, PhD ’12 is currently serving as executive director of Alpha Academy. BA Bachelor of Arts BFA Bachelor of Fine Arts BM Bachelor of Music BS Bachelor of Science MA Master of Arts MS Master of Science MAcc Master of Accounting MBA Master of Business Administration (always abbreviated) MBT Master of Business Taxation ME Master of Education MFA Master of Fine Arts (always abbreviated) MFT Master of Marriage and Family Therapy MHA Master of Health Administration MHP Master of Historic Preservation MLA Master of Landscape Architecture MM Master of Music MMM Master of Medical Management MPA Master of Public Administration MPAS Master of Public Art Studies MPH Master of Public Health MPL Master of Planning MPP Master of Public Policy MPW Master of Professional Writing (nearly always abbreviated) MRED Master of Real Estate Development MCM Master of Communication Management MCM Master of Construction Management MSW Master of Social Work DDS Doctor of Dental Surgery DMA Doctor of Musical Arts DPA Doctor of Public Administration DPPD Doctor of Policy, Planning, and Development DPT Doctor of Physical Therapy EdD Doctor of Education 1 Style Guide for USC Communications (Revised on 4/9/13) JD Juris Doctor MD Doctor of Medicine PharmD Doctor of Pharmacy PhD Doctor of Philosophy * Typically, it is OK to substitute “master’s” for “master’s degree.” But when referring to the MAT@USC program, write it out: Master of Arts in Teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Titles and Their Meanings
    Degrees and their meanings Similar degrees from other countries might differ in their academic meaning. Someone studying medicine in Germany finishes with the German State Examination; the final certificate is without any awarded title. In other countries you might receive the certificate of a MD (Medical Doctor) with your final examination, or a diploma of „dr.med.“ and so on, nevertheless all these degrees are certificates of your finished study. So, in Germany all these documents are not accepted as an equivalence to our academic Doctor’s title and therefore do not qualify for postdoc-programs for example. After a finished study (which in many countries consists of Bachelor and Master), the academic steps differ: in Germany these steps in general are „Promotion“ (for a Doctor’s degree) and „Habilitation“ (for a position comparable to an associate professor). Instead of these two steps, many other countries however offer just one: the „PhD“ which therefore might be compared to a German „Promotion“ („Dr.med.“; „Dr.sc.hum.“, „Dr.rer.nat.“, and so on) of high quality. At our faculty you therefore apply for a „Doctorate“ receiving a degree like „Dr.med.“ or „Dr.sc.hum.“, not for the „PhD“ or the „MD“ (even if there is a lot of confusion about all these terms in general, and in application forms often the term „PhD-student“ is used). If you already are a „PhD“, it is not possible to apply for a Doctor’s degree since the „PhD“ is regarded as equivalent to it and the next academic step in Germany would be the „Habilitation“.
    [Show full text]