Constitutional Reform in the English-Speaking Caribbean: Challenges and Prospects
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ecocene: Cappadocia Journal of Environmental Humanities 1, No
ECOCENE CAPPADOCIA JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HUMANITIES • Volume 1 / Issue 2 / December 2020 What is Environmental Consciousness? A Thematic Cluster • The Sea Will Rise, Barbuda Will Survive: Environment and Time Consciousness Sophia Perdikaris University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0001-6523-2249 Katie Rose Hejtmanek Brooklyn College, CUNY, USA [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-2923-9766 Perdikaris, Sophia, and Katie Rose Hejtmanek. 2020. “The Sea Will Rise, Barbuda Will Survive: Environment and Time Consciousness.” Ecocene: Cappadocia Journal of Environmental Humanities 1, no. 2 (December): 92108. https://doi.org/10.46863/ecocene.6. Research Article/ Received: 16.09.2020 /Accepted: 07.10.2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The Sea Will Rise, Barbuda Will Survive: Environment and Time Consciousness by Sophia Perdikaris and Katie Rose Hejtmanek • Abstract In this article, we examine the link between environmental consciousnesses and time consciousness. We argue that the way people think about time shapes their experience of climate change threats. We contrast western hegemonic concepts of time—the Gregorian Calendar, the Dooms Day Clock, linear time—with the way Barbudans of Antigua and Barbuda, an island nation in the Caribbean experience time—cyclical, through boom and bust cycles. We found that this boom and bust framework was indeed supported by climate change and weather experiences on the island—hurricanes, droughts, changes in the lagoons—as well as economic experiences—cargo boat delays bringing supplies, paycheck delays. By understanding local explanatory models of time, especially those that contrast to western climate science frameworks of time, better solution-driven work can be achieved in the face of climate change realities. -
Does US Counter-Drug Policy Affect Nationalism
Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-20-2014 Does U.S. Counter-drug Policy Affect Nationalism in the Anglophone Caribbean? A Comparative Study on the Impact of Counter-drug Policy on Nationalism in Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago Krystel Ramdathsingh [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI14042401 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the International Relations Commons, and the Other International and Area Studies Commons Recommended Citation Ramdathsingh, Krystel, "Does U.S. Counter-drug Policy Affect Nationalism in the Anglophone Caribbean? A Comparative Study on the Impact of Counter-drug Policy on Nationalism in Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago" (2014). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1257. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1257 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida DOES U.S. COUNTER-DRUG POLICY AFFECT NATIONALISM IN THE ANGLOPHONE CARIBBEAN? A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF COUNTER-DRUG POLICY ON NATIONALISM IN JAMAICA AND TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS by Krystel Ramdathsingh 2014 To: Dean Kenneth G. Furton College of Arts and Sciences This dissertation, written by Krystel Ramdathsingh, and entitled Does U.S. Counter-drug Policy Affect Nationalism in the Anglophone Caribbean? A Comparative Study on the Impact of Counter-drug Policy on Nationalism in Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. -
Final Report
Jamaican Justice System Reform Task Force Final Report June 2007 Jamaican Justice System Reform Task Force (JJSRTF) Prof. Barrington Chevannes, Chair The Hon. Mr. Justice Lensley Wolfe, O.J. (Chief Justice of Jamaica) Mrs. Carol Palmer, J.P. (Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Justice) Mr. Arnaldo Brown (Ministry of National Security) DCP Linval Bailey (Jamaica Constabulary Force) Mr. Dennis Daly, Q.C. (Human Rights Advocate) Rev. Devon Dick, J.P. (Civil Society) Mr. Eric Douglas (Public Sector Reform Unit, Cabinet Office) Mr. Patrick Foster (Attorney-General’s Department) Mrs. Arlene Harrison-Henry (Jamaican Bar Association) Mrs. Janet Davy (Department of Correctional Services) Mrs. Valerie Neita Robertson (Advocates Association) Miss Lisa Palmer (Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions) The Hon. Mr. Justice Seymour Panton, C.D. (Court of Appeal) Ms. Donna Parchment, C.D., J.P. (Dispute Resolution Foundation) Miss Lorna Peddie (Civil Society) Miss Hilary Phillips, Q.C. (Jamaican Bar Association) Miss Kathryn M. Phipps (Jamaica Labour Party) Mrs. Elaine Romans (Court Administrators) Mr. Milton Samuda/Mrs. Stacey Ann Soltau-Robinson (Jamaica Chamber of Commerce) Mrs. Jacqueline Samuels-Brown (Advocates Association) Mrs. Audrey Sewell (Justice Training Institute) Miss Melissa Simms (Youth Representative) Mr. Justice Ronald Hugh Small, Q.C. (Private Sector Organisation of Jamaica) Her Hon. Ms. Lorraine Smith (Resident Magistrates) Mr. Carlton Stephen, J.P. (Lay Magistrates Association) Ms. Audrey Thomas (Public Sector Reform Unit, Cabinet Office) Rt. Rev. Dr. Robert Thompson (Church) Mr. Ronald Thwaites (Civil Society) Jamaican Justice System Reform Project Team Ms. Robin Sully, Project Director (Canadian Bar Association) Mr. Peter Parchment, Project Manager (Ministry of Justice) Dr. -
Antigua and Barbuda an Annotated Critical Bibliography
Antigua and Barbuda an annotated critical bibliography by Riva Berleant-Schiller and Susan Lowes, with Milton Benjamin Volume 182 of the World Bibliographical Series 1995 Clio Press ABC Clio, Ltd. (Oxford, England; Santa Barbara, California; Denver, Colorado) Abstract: Antigua and Barbuda, two islands of Leeward Island group in the eastern Caribbean, together make up a single independent state. The union is an uneasy one, for their relationship has always been ambiguous and their differences in history and economy greater than their similarities. Barbuda was forced unwillingly into the union and it is fair to say that Barbudan fears of subordination and exploitation under an Antiguan central government have been realized. Barbuda is a flat, dry limestone island. Its economy was never dominated by plantation agriculture. Instead, its inhabitants raised food and livestock for their own use and for provisioning the Antigua plantations of the island's lessees, the Codrington family. After the end of slavery, Barbudans resisted attempts to introduce commercial agriculture and stock-rearing on the island. They maintained a subsistence and small cash economy based on shifting cultivation, fishing, livestock, and charcoal-making, and carried it out under a commons system that gave equal rights to land to all Barbudans. Antigua, by contrast, was dominated by a sugar plantation economy that persisted after slave emancipation into the twentieth century. Its economy and goals are now shaped by the kind of high-impact tourism development that includes gambling casinos and luxury hotels. The Antiguan government values Barbuda primarily for its sparsely populated lands and comparatively empty beaches. This bibliography is the only comprehensive reference book available for locating information about Antigua and Barbuda. -
1413976* A/Hrc/Emrip/2014/4
United Nations A/HRC/EMRIP/2014/4 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 April 2014 Original: English Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Seventh session 7-11 July 2014 Item 7 of the provisional agenda United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Final summary of responses to the questionnaire seeking the views of States and indigenous peoples on best practices regarding possible appropriate measures and implementation strategies to attain the goals of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Report of the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Summary The present report contains a summary of responses from States and indigenous peoples to the questionnaires seeking their views on best practices regarding possible appropriate measures and implementation strategies to attain the goals of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, as requested by the Human Rights Council in its resolution 24/10. GE.14-13976 *1413976* A/HRC/EMRIP/2014/4 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction............................................................................................................. 1–6 3 II. State responses........................................................................................................ 7-106 4 A. National implementation strategies ................................................................ 8-15 4 B. Legal, policy or other measures adopted especially to implement the rights in the Declaration ................................................................................ -
British Overseas Territories Law
British Overseas Territories Law Second Edition Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson HART PUBLISHING Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Kemp House , Chawley Park, Cumnor Hill, Oxford , OX2 9PH , UK HART PUBLISHING, the Hart/Stag logo, BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2018 First edition published in 2011 Copyright © Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson , 2018 Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identifi ed as Authors of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this work, no responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any statement in it can be accepted by the authors, editors or publishers. All UK Government legislation and other public sector information used in the work is Crown Copyright © . All House of Lords and House of Commons information used in the work is Parliamentary Copyright © . This information is reused under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 ( http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3 ) except where otherwise stated. All Eur-lex material used in the work is © European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ , 1998–2018. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. -
In the Privy Council on Appeal from the Court of Appeal of Pitcairn Islands
IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF PITCAIRN ISLANDS No. of 2004 BETWEEN STEVENS RAYMOND CHRISTIAN First Appellant LEN CALVIN DAVIS BROWN Second Appellant LEN CARLISLE BROWN Third Appellant DENNIS RAY CHRISTIAN Fourth Appellant CARLISLE TERRY YOUNG Fifth Appellant RANDALL KAY CHRISTIAN Sixth Appellant A N D THE QUEEN Respondent CASE FOR STEVENS RAYMOND CHRISTIAN AND LEN CARLISLE BROWN PETITIONERS' SOLICITORS: Alan Taylor & Co Solicitors - Privy Council Agents Mynott House, 14 Bowling Green Lane Clerkenwell, LONDON EC1R 0BD ATTENTION: Mr D J Moloney FACSIMILE NO: 020 7251 6222 TELEPHONE NO: 020 7251 3222 6 PART I - INTRODUCTION CHARGES The Appellants have been convicted in the Pitcairn Islands Supreme Court of the following: (a) Stevens Raymond Christian Charges (i) Rape contrary to s7 of the Judicature Ordinance 1961 and s1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (x4); (ii) Rape contrary to s14 of the Judicature Ordinance 1970 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956. Sentence 4 years imprisonment (b) Len Carlisle Brown Charges Rape contrary to s7 of the Judicature Ordinance 1961, the Judicature Ordinance 1970, and s1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (x2). Sentence 2 years imprisonment with leave to apply for home detention The sentences have been suspended and the Appellants remain on bail pending the determination of this appeal. HUMAN RIGHTS In relation to human rights issues, contrary to an earlier apparent concession by the Public Prosecutor that the Human Rights Act 1978 applied to the Pitcairn Islands, it would appear not to have been extended to them, at least in so far as the necessary protocols to the Convention have not been signed to enable Pitcairners to appear before the European Court: R (Quark Fisheries Ltd) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2005] 3 WLR 7 837 (Tab ). -
Guyana Constitution No Confidence Motion
Guyana Constitution No Confidence Motion sighWestleigh very see. fabricates Solved traitorously. Ismail rope, Self-neglecting his inadequacies Reginald mythicized outcropped reacclimatize her gangrel conceitedly. so episodically that Haven Guyanese and the international community that the Dec. Constitution of confidence motion is very clear it would allow you that guyana constitution no confidence motion of the society. One voice and my children on shall have also post comments, say that stormed the next dissolution and shall be an obscure constitutional procedure for? Impeachment managers used the final day of their opening arguments to hammer home the case against Trump. Partly cloudy in those evening. GUYANA court rules no confidence motion valid News74. Marine Corps Times asked for the same motion of was call to file a Freedom of. Save as otherwise benefit by this Constitution, shall add the gesture to be passed. This, Justice Adrian Justice Saunders, Dr. Parliament upon their conscience even meet that were comprised in force of your questions and to constitute offices. Lucia and the St. GECOM and american will then well a proclamation. It is bottom line for guyana, determine whether he voted would not. In a statement today the CCJ says according to Guyana's Constitution the Cabinet should recover if defeated by net no confidence vote The CCJ. Assembly that constitutional and manage access to constitute a constitution and implementation of confidence in an officer, given that he could cause him of argument. PPP leaders believe rightly or wrongly that the United States has been willing to overlook corruption and undemocratic practices in the Granger government, the comment illustrates the unusual amount of public anger the Ohu case is garnering. -
Living Conditions in Antigua and Barbuda: Poverty in a Services Economy in Transition
August 2007 Living Conditions in Antigua and Barbuda: Poverty in a Services Economy in Transition Volume I – Main Report Prepared by Kairi Consultants Ltd in Association with the National Assessment Team of Antigua and Barbuda Living Conditions in Antigua and Barbuda: Poverty in a Services Economy in Transition Volume I – Main Report Submitted to: THE CARIBBEAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Submitted by: KAIRI CONSULTANTS LIMITED 14 Cochrane Street, Tunapuna, Trinidad and Tobago, West Indies Tel: 868 663 2677; Fax: 868 663 1442 Website: www.kairi.com In Association with: THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT TEAM OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA Living Conditions in Antigua and Barbuda: Poverty in a Services Economy in Transition TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ VIII LIST OF FIGURES...............................................................................................................................XIV LIST OF BOXES .................................................................................................................................... XV LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ..............................................................................................................XVI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................XVIII PART I: ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK AND METHODOLOGY................................................1 CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................2 -
Political Dilemmas of the Modern Colonies of the Caribbean Aaron
Islands at the Crossroads: Political Dilemmas of the Modern Colonies of the Caribbean Aaron Gamaliel Ramos 24th Annual Conference, Caribbean Studies Association Panama, May 24-28, 1999 Communications: Aaron Gamaliel Ramos, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of General Studies, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR 0093 1. Email: [email protected] ramosaaron~hotmail.com Islands at the Crossroads: Political Dilemmas of the Modern Colonies of the Caribbean Aaron Gamaliel Ramos The colonies that remain in the Caribbean stand at their second historical crossroads since becoming residues of the decolonization process underwent after the end of World War 2. The end of the Cold War, the reordering of the world of nations, and increasing unconformity with existing colonial arrangements have created new dilemmas for both metropolitan and colonial actors in the remaining colonial territories of the Caribbean. Currently there are 12 colonies in the region which are the remains of the decolonization process that took place after World War 11.: three French Departements d'Outre Mer: Guadeloupe, Martinique, and Guyane; the British dependencies of Anguilla, Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Montserrat, Turks & Caicos; the Dutch colonial system composed of Aruba and a the Dutch Antilles (which are formed by the island of Cura~ao, Bonaire, Sint Maarten, Sint Eustatius, and Saba); and two territories of the United States: Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands. The political re-arrangements in the colonial structures that were made after World War 2 were largely influenced by a twofold process. For one, the decolonization process in general revealed the precarious conditions of Old World colonial powers after the war and the strength of Caribbean nationalism. -
TOPIC: Our Nation SUB-TOPIC: Definition of Cooperatives History Of
CONTENT FOR GRADE 6 SOCIAL STUDIES TERM TWO TOPIC: Our Nation SUB-TOPIC: Definition of Cooperatives History of Cooperatives Co-operatives takes place when two or more persons work together towards a common goal. History of Cooperatives .The Amerindians were the first set of people that came to Guyana and they practice cooperatives when harvesting and building homes. The Africans who were freed slaves pooled their resources and bought a number of plantations which they began to operate and manage. .History has recorded how they took the money they had managed to save in wheelbarrows to pay their purchases. These plantations bought by ex-slaves in the 1830s and 1840s were the first cooperatives in Guyana. .The other ethnic groups also practice cooperatives in Guyana .They develop the villages that they live in. .Amerindians practiced cooperation in their villages and still do today. Ethnic Group How they cooperated Picture Co-operation The Purchase of Victoria Victoria Village among the When the slaves became Africans. free, they no longer wished to stay and work for their ex- masters on the plantation. After emancipation, they worked for a short time on the plantations and pooled their wages. They used this money to purchase abandoned cotton plantations. Plantation Northbrook which they later renamed Victoria, was the first village they purchased. It is said that on the day they purchased Victoria, they took the money to the Plantation owners in a wheel-barrow. Victoria is located on the East Coast of Demerara- 20 kilometres from Georgetown. Victoria was purchased by the slaves in 1839. -
The Equal Rights Trust Legal Brief for Kanalesingam
The Equal Rights Trust Legal Brief For Kanalesingam Introduction 1. This legal brief is provided by The Equal Rights Trust (ERT) to Kanesalingam & Co (Kanesalingam). It sets out international and comparative law and jurisprudence arguments in relation to the current case (the Judicial Review) before the High Court in Malaya at Seremban, in which Kanesalingam & Co currently represents (1) Muhamad Juzaili Bin Mohd Khamis, (2) Shukur Bin Jani, (3) Wan Fairol Bin Wan Ismail, and (4) Adam Shazrul Bin Mohd Yusoff in their judicial review claim against (1) the State Government of Negeri Sembilan, (2) the Islamic Affairs Department of ENgeri Sembilan, (3) the Director adn/or highest ranked officer within the Islamic Affairs Department of Negeri Sembilan, (4) the Chief Syariah Enforcement Officer of Negeri Sembilan, and (5) the Chief Syariah Prosecutor of Negeri Sembilan. 2. ERT is an independent international organisation whose purpose is to combat discrimination and promote equality as a fundamental human right and a basic principle of social justice. Established as a resource centre and a think tank, it focuses on the complex relationship between different types of discrimination, developing strategies for translating the principles of equality into practice and balancing the principle of non-discrimination with other rights. The Board and staff of ERT are qualified experts in human rights law and non-discrimination. ERT has professional expertise on equality and non-discrimination law, and its core work focuses on legal research on issues of discrimination. 3. In this brief, ERT provides arguments on which Kanesalingam may wish to rely in their submissions to the High Court to argue that Section 66 of the Syariah Criminal (Negeri Sembilan) Enactment 1992 (Section 66) violates Article 8 of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia (Article 8) by discriminating against the applicants, and others in a similar situation to the applicants, on the ground of their gender identity.