Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 7-31-2006 On the Stephen Macedo and John Finnis Exchange: Natural Law, Liberalism, and Homosexuality: A Critical Assessment Brian B. Coleman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Coleman, Brian B., "On the Stephen Macedo and John Finnis Exchange: Natural Law, Liberalism, and Homosexuality: A Critical Assessment." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2006. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/11 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. ON THE STEPHEN MACEDO AND JOHN FINNIS EXCANGE: NATURAL LAW, LIBERALISM, AND HOMOSEXUALITY: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT by BRIAN B. COLEMAN Under the Direction of Andrew Altman ABSTRACT This essay is an exploration of the debate between John Finnis and Stephen Macedo on the value of homosexuality. In “Is Natural Law Theory Compatible with Limited Government?” Finnis, a natural law theorist, rejects value-neutralist arguments, stating that the political community can and should make value judgments about its members’ life-choices and that such normative evaluations are compatible with liberalism. Particularly, Finnis argues that homosexuality is in its essence always harmful and degrading, thus unable to participate in the basic human goods it imitates. Furthermore, he argues that the political community in liberal democratic societies is justified in discouraging homosexual conduct as a viable way of life.