Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 1-2003 The Harmonization Game: What Basketball Can Teach about Intellectual Property and International Trade Peter K. Yu
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the International Trade Law Commons Recommended Citation Peter K. Yu, The Harmonization Game: What Basketball Can Teach about Intellectual Property and International Trade, 26 Fordham Int'l L.J. 218 (2003). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/509 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. ARTICLES THE HARMONIZATION GAME: WHAT BASKETBALL CAN TEACH ABOUT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE Peter K Yu* INTRODUCTION The United States finally lost! After winning fifty-eight con- secutive games over ten years with stars from the National Bas- ketball Association ("NBA"), Team USA finally lost to Argentina, a team consisting mainly of players who would be deemed un- qualified to play in the NBA. 1 Showcasing fundamentals and teamwork, the Argentines beat the U.S. men's basketball team by running flawless pick-and-rolls and backdoor cuts. No spectacu- lar dunks. No shake and bake. No in-your-face crossovers. Pure basics. A game later, in the quarterfinals, the U.S. team lost again to Yugoslavia, blowing a ten-point lead with three minutes left in regulation time.' What was once idolized as the Dream Team has now become the "nightmare team." Before exiting the tour- nament, Team USA lost again to Spain, leaving the players in shock, disappointment, embarrassment, and shame.3 For the first time since NBA players represented the red, white, and blue, Team USA failed to earn a medal in international competi- tion.