“The Bride of Frankenstein” (1935) by Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Short Review: “The Bride of Frankenstein” (1935) by Dr. John L. Flynn Bride of Frankenstein, The (1935). Universal, b/w, 80 min. Director: James Whale. Producer: Carl Laemmle. Screenwriters: John Balderston and Willim Hurlbut. Cast: Boris Karloff, Colin Clive, Elsa Lanchester, Ernest Thesiger, Valerie Hobson, and Dwight Frye. The first of many Universal sequels following Whale’s classic, this was one of the few sequels that was actually superior to the original. After a brief prologue that pays homage to Mary and Percy Shelley, Lord Byron and their writing competition that inspired Frankenstein, the film picks up right where the original ended, with the monster (Karloff) dying in fire. But the monster did not die, and is soon out terrorizing the locals again. Dr. Praetorius (Thesiger) and his demented assistant Karl (Frye) pay Frankenstein (Clive) a visit, and soon the three are at work on a new creature (Lanchester). Not long after his “bride” is brought to life, the monster drops in to claim her, but she only has eyes for Frankenstein. Angered, the monster blows up the laboratory, and the usual conflagration consumes them all. “Bride” was clearly the most stylishly mounted production of the 1930's, and represents a high-water mark of the Golden Age of the American Horror Film. But it should be noted that the film title is really a misnomer and has contributed much to the confusion of the mad doctor's name with the monster. The title should have been "The Bride of the Monster of Frankenstein." Oh, well. Followed four years later by “Son of Frankenstein.” Copyright 2016 by John L. Flynn, Ph.D. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Marquetry on Drawer-Model Marionette Duo-Art
Marquetry on Drawer-Model Marionette Duo-Art This piano began life as a brown Recordo. The sound board was re-engineered, as the original ribs tapered so soon that the bass bridges pushed through. The strings were the wrong weight, and were re-scaled using computer technology. Six more wound-strings were added, and the weights of the steel strings were changed. A 14-inch Duo-Art pump, a fan-expression system, and an expression-valve-size Duo-Art stack with a soft-pedal compensation lift were all built for it. The Marquetry on the side of the piano was inspired by the pictures on the Arto-Roll boxes. The fallboard was inspired by a picture on the Rhythmodic roll box. A new bench was built, modeled after the bench originally available, but veneered to go with the rest of the piano. The AMICA BULLETIN AUTOMATIC MUSICAL INSTRUMENT COLLECTORS’ ASSOCIATION SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2005 VOLUME 42, NUMBER 5 Teresa Carreno (1853-1917) ISSN #1533-9726 THE AMICA BULLETIN AUTOMATIC MUSICAL INSTRUMENT COLLECTORS' ASSOCIATION Published by the Automatic Musical Instrument Collectors’ Association, a non-profit, tax exempt group devoted to the restoration, distribution and enjoyment of musical instruments using perforated paper music rolls and perforated music books. AMICA was founded in San Francisco, California in 1963. PROFESSOR MICHAEL A. KUKRAL, PUBLISHER, 216 MADISON BLVD., TERRE HAUTE, IN 47803-1912 -- Phone 812-238-9656, E-mail: [email protected] Visit the AMICA Web page at: http://www.amica.org Associate Editor: Mr. Larry Givens VOLUME 42, Number
[Show full text]
The Horror Film Series
Ihe Museum of Modern Art No. 11 jest 53 Street, New York, N.Y. 10019 Circle 5-8900 Cable: Modernart Saturday, February 6, I965 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE The Museum of Modern Art Film Library will present THE HORROR FILM, a series of 20 films, from February 7 through April, 18. Selected by Arthur L. Mayer, the series is planned as a representative sampling, not a comprehensive survey, of the horror genre. The pictures range from the early German fantasies and legends, THE CABINET OF DR. CALIGARI (I9I9), NOSFERATU (1922), to the recent Roger Corman-Vincent Price British series of adaptations of Edgar Allan Poe, represented here by THE MASQUE OF THE RED DEATH (I96IO. Milestones of American horror films, the Universal series in the 1950s, include THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA (1925), FRANKENSTEIN (1951), his BRIDE (l$55), his SON (1929), and THE MUMMY (1953). The resurgence of the horror film in the 1940s, as seen in a series produced by Val Lewton at RR0, is represented by THE CAT PEOPLE (19^), THE CURSE OF THE CAT PEOPLE (19^4), I WALKED WITH A ZOMBIE (19*£), and THE BODY SNAT0HER (19^5). Richard Griffith, Director of the Film Library, and Mr. Mayer, in their book, The Movies, state that "In true horror films, the archcriminal becomes the archfiend the first and greatest of whom was undoubtedly Lon Chaney. ...The year Lon Chaney died [1951], his director, Tod Browning,filmed DRACULA and therewith launched the full vogue of horror films. What made DRACULA a turning-point was that it did not attempt to explain away its tale of vampirism and supernatural horrors.
[Show full text]
A Reappraisal of Three Character Actors from Hollywood’S Golden Age
University of the Incarnate Word The Athenaeum Theses & Dissertations 12-2015 Second-Billed but not Second-Rate: A Reappraisal of Three Character Actors From Hollywood’s Golden Age Candace M. Graham University of the Incarnate Word, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://athenaeum.uiw.edu/uiw_etds Part of the Communication Commons, and the Film and Media Studies Commons Recommended Citation Graham, Candace M., "Second-Billed but not Second-Rate: A Reappraisal of Three Character Actors From Hollywood’s Golden Age" (2015). Theses & Dissertations. 70. https://athenaeum.uiw.edu/uiw_etds/70 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Athenaeum. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Athenaeum. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SECOND-BILLED BUT NOT SECOND-RATE: A REAPPRAISAL OF THREE CHARACTER ACTORS FROM HOLLYWOOD’S GOLDEN AGE by Candace M. Graham A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the University of the Incarnate Word in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS University of the Incarnate Word December 2015 ii Copyright 2015 by Candace M. Graham iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank Dr. Hsin-I (Steve) Liu for challenging me to produce a quality thesis worthy of contribution to scholarly literature. In addition, thank you for the encouragement to enjoy writing. To Robert Darden, Baylor University communications professor, friend, and mentor whose example in humility, good spirit, and devotion to one’s passion continues to guide my pursuit as a classic film scholar.
[Show full text]
Bride of Frankenstein
Frankenstein and The Bride of Frankenstein Richard T. Jameson “The A List: The National Society of Film Critics 100 Essential Films, ” 2002 Reprinted by permission of the author In 1931, the director Robert Florey lived in a Los Ange- les apartment with a view of a Dutch-style bakery and its logo, a windmill complete with turning vanes. Flo- rey had just been assigned by Carl Laemmle Jr. to di- rect a production of “Frankenstein” for Universal, and as he mused on a possible look for the film, he found himself considering a windmill as a key location— perhaps the site of the scientist’s secret laboratory. As it happened, it would be James Whale, not Florey, who directed “Frankenstein,” and Henry Frankenstein would set up shop in “an abandoned watchtower.” But that windmill got lodged in the collective brain of the filmmaking team (also in one line of dialogue absent- mindedly retained from an early script draft), and fi- nally made it on screen as an opportunistic but aptly crazed-Gothic setting for the film’s fiery climax. It’s all very well to talk about aesthetically unified mas- terpieces and posit them as the definition of film art. But movies are a messy business, and the irksome (glorious?) truth is that some landmark films have be- Poster from the 1953 re-release of the ‘30s horror classic come utterly indispensable and culturally pervasive Courtesy Library of Congress Prints & Photographs Online Collection despite being created by committee and riddled with imperfections. In the case of Frankenstein, the imper- fections include half-baked sequences, tedious subsidi- ture he’d assembled from parts of dead bodies.
[Show full text]
Gothic—Film—Parody1
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lancaster E-Prints Gothic—Film—Parody1 Kamilla Elliott Department of English and Creative Writing, Lancaster University, United Kingdom [email protected] Abstract: Gothic, film, and parody are all erstwhile devalued aesthetic forms recuperated by various late twentieth-century humanities theories, serving in return as proof-texts for these theories in their battles against formalism, high-art humanism, and right-wing politics. Gothic film parodies parody these theories as well as Gothic fiction and films. As they redouble Gothic doubles, refake Gothic fakeries, and critique Gothic criticism, they go beyond simple mockery to reveal inconsistencies, incongruities, and problems in Gothic criticism: boundaries that it has been unwilling or unable to blur, binary oppositions it has refused to deconstruct, like those between left- and right-wing politics, and points at which a radical, innovative, subversive discourse manifests as its own hegemonic, dogmatic, and clichéd double, as in critical manipulations of Gothic (dis)belief. The discussion engages Gothic film parodies spanning a range of decades (from the 1930s to the 2000s) and genres (from feature films to cartoons to pornographic parodies). Keywords: Gothic; film; parody; literary film adaptation; criticism; theory; psychoanalysis; identity politics; belief; We laugh at the structures which had in the past formed the appearance of inviolable 1 truth. Today’s laughter is the movement from the laughter of the past. —Sander L. Gilman (23) The hyphens in the title are part homage to, part parody of Roland Barthes’s Image— Music—Text.
[Show full text]
Reflections of Science and Medicine in Two Frankenstein Adaptations: Frankenstein (Whale
Reflections of Science and Medicine in Two Frankenstein Adaptations: Frankenstein (Whale 1931) and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (Branagh 1994) Fran Pheasant-Kelly Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, a novel that centers on a scientist who collects organs and limbs from dead bodies to construct a new being, illustrates the complex, interwoven history of science and science fiction. The novel’s attention to the animation of assembled body parts reflects contemporaneous scientific interest in the reanimation of corpses by galvanism. In this article, I extend the science/science-fiction relationship developed in the novel by analyzing the visual differences between two of its subsequent film adaptations. Although scholars have extensively scrutinized and speculated about Shelley’s influences, limited consideration of contemporary scientific influences on later film versions exists. The first production considered here, directed by James Whale in 1931, presents Shelley’s Creature1 as a monstrous robotic figure, suggesting automation as an influencing theme and electricity as a source of life. Its mechanical movement echoes developments in mechanization typical of the time, as well as the related theme of automatism associated with the Futurist art movement. In stark contrast, the Creature of Kenneth Branagh’s 1994 adaptation is corporeal and abject, with more emphasis placed on bodily fluids than electricity. While neither version takes into account obvious medical implausibilities, such as incompatible tissue types, brain death, and irreversible tissue damage, they do reveal how discourses of science and medical history have shifted since Shelley wrote her novel. If Whale’s adaptation reflects interest in and experimentation with the effects of technology and electricity as well as co-existent issues of eugenics and criminal atavism, then Branagh’s film typifies concurrent scientific preoccupations with assisted reproduction and cloning.
[Show full text]
Trio of Terror Lyz Reblin
e-Research: A Journal of Undergraduate Work Volume 2 Article 6 Number 1 Vol 2, No 1 (2011) September 2014 Trio of Terror Lyz Reblin Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/e-Research Part of the Film and Media Studies Commons Recommended Citation Reblin, Lyz (2014) "Trio of Terror," e-Research: A Journal of Undergraduate Work: Vol. 2: No. 1, Article 6. Available at: http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/e-Research/vol2/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in e-Research: A Journal of Undergraduate Work by an authorized administrator of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reblin: Trio of Terror Trio of Terror e-Research: A Journal of Undergraduate Work, Vol 2, No 1 (2011) HOME ABOUT LOGIN REGISTER SEARCH CURRENT ARCHIVES Home > Vol 2, No 1 (2011) > Reblin Trio of Terror Lyz Reblin Key words, concepts, and names: Nosferatu, Dracula, Vampyr, Vampire, Horror. Intro From the earliest silent films such as Georges Méliès' The Devil's Castle (1896) to the recent Twilight adaptation, the vampire genre, like the creatures it presents, has been resurrected throughout cinematic history. More than a hundred vampire films have been produced, along with over a dozen Dracula adaptations. The Count has even appeared in films not pertaining to Bram Stoker's original novel. He has been played by the likes of Bela Lugosi, Christopher Lee (fourteen times) both John and David Carradine, and even Academy Award winner Gary Oldman.
[Show full text]
Young Frankenstein” (1974) by Dr
Short Review: “Young Frankenstein” (1974) by Dr. John L. Flynn Young Frankenstein (1974). Venture Films and Crossbow Productions, b/w, 108 min. Director: Mel Brooks. Producer: Michael Gruskoff. Screenwriters: Brooks and Gene Wilder. Cast: Gene Wilder, Peter Boyle, Marty Feldman, Madeline Kahn, Cloris Leachman, and Gene Hackman. Directed by Mel Brooks, with the same inspired zaniness of his “Blazing Saddles” (1974), this brilliant pastiche spoofed many of the familiar clichés of the horror/sci-fi genre while, at the same time, paying homage to the traditional forms which over the many decades had become classic. Baron Beauford von Frankenstein has finally passed away, willing his estate to his great grandson (Wilder). When Dr. Frederick Frankenstein (pronounced FRONK-kon-steen) arrives in the fantasy land of Transylvania, he resumes the work of his ancestor. Aided by hunchbacked Igor, pronounced EYE-gore (Feldman), and sexy assistant Inga (Garr), Frankenstein creates yet another monster (Boyle). When the creature goes on its predictable rampage, it leaves Frankenstein's castle to terrorize the local populace. But the rampage is played more for comedy than terror, as the monster is charmed by a little girl and played fool by a blind man (Hackman). Eventually, the Creature dons a top hat and tails to perform “Puttin' on the Ritz” (like Fred Astaire) for the townspeople, and hooks up with the mad doctor’s girlfriend Elizabeth (Kahn). A dozen or so orgasms later, Elizabeth has exchanged her brainy boyfriend for the Creature, Frankenstein settles for Inga, and the two couples live happily ever after. The movie succeeds as both a clever parody and a loving tribute of the genre.
[Show full text]
Download the Newsletter
Saturday, October 27, 2012, 2 & 8 pm only The PLUS! Monster Debate a nod to the national election, the In Alex Film Society in association with Dr. Shocker, presents a fast paced and funny debate starring Dr. Frankenstein’s Monster and The Wolf Man. The live, on stage debate between the Monster, a member of the ELECTRICAN party and the Wolf Man running on the LYCANCRAT ticket will be hosted by Timothy Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man is the last E. Goodwin (at 2 PM) and by CNN reporter of the really good Universal monster features. Jim Roope at 8 PM. In addition to Daniel Roebuck as the Wolf Man and John Goodwin as The Monster, the cast A direct sequel to both The Wolf Man and Ghost of will feature Spooktacular alumni, Jesse J. Adams, Steve Frankenstein, the plot follows Larry Talbot (played Christopher, John Gilbert, Aaron Lewis and Tim Keegan. again by Lon Chaney Jr.), the werewolf, who realizes David Hansen-Sturm of Twin Palms Media collaborated with that he can’t die. In order to find inner peace, Maleva, Roebuck on the political ads. (Maria Ouspenskaya) the gypsy, takes him to find Dr. Frankenstein. Talbot instead finds the Monster Daniel Roebuck, one of Hollywood’s busiest (Bela Lugosi), now with Ygor’s brain but severely character actors, is no stranger to the damaged. When a doctor teams up with Talbot in order horror genre. He has appeared in many of to help him, the Wolf Man sadly discovers the doctor’s Rob Zombie’s films, including his latest, true intentions.
[Show full text]
Title Catalog Link Section Call # Summary Starring 28 Days Later
Randall Library Horror Films -- October 2009 Check catalog link for availability Title Catalog link Section Call # Summary Starring 28 days later http://uncclc.coast.uncwil. DVD PN1995.9. An infirmary patient wakes up from a coma to Cillian Murphy, Naomie Harris, edu/record=b1917831 Horror H6 A124 an empty room ... in a vacant hospital ... in a Christopher Eccleston, Megan Burns, 2003 deserted city. A powerful virus, which locks Brendan Gleeson victims into a permanent state of murderous rage, has transformed the world around him into a seemingly desolate wasteland. Now a handful of survivors must fight to stay alive, 30 days of night http://uncclc.coast.uncwil. DVD PN1995.9. An isolated Alaskan town is plunged into Josh Hartnett, Melissa George, Danny edu/record=b2058882 Horror H6 A126 darkness for a month each year when the sun Huston, Ben Foster, Mark Boone, Jr., 2008 sinks below the horizon. As the last rays of Mark Rendall, Amber Sainsbury, Manu light fade, the town is attacked by a Bennett bloodthirsty gang of vampires bent on an uninterrupted orgy of destruction. Only the town's husband-and-wife Sheriff team stand 976-EVIL http://uncclc.coast.uncwil. VHS PN1995.9. A contemporary gothic tale of high-tech horror. Stephen Geoffreys, Sandy Dennis, edu/record=b1868584 Horror H6 N552 High school underdog Hoax Wilmoth fills up Lezlie Deane 1989 the idle hours in his seedy hometown fending off the local leather-jacketed thugs, avoiding his overbearing, religious fanatic mother and dreaming of a date with trailer park tempress Suzie. But his quietly desperate life takes a Alfred Hitchcock's http://uncclc.coast.uncwil.
[Show full text]
Deconstruction of the Sacred, Ontologies of Monstrosity: Apophatic Approaches in Late Modernist Cinema Scott D
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses July 2016 Deconstruction of the Sacred, Ontologies of Monstrosity: Apophatic Approaches in Late Modernist Cinema scott d. vangel University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation vangel, scott d., "Deconstruction of the Sacred, Ontologies of Monstrosity: Apophatic Approaches in Late Modernist Cinema" (2016). Doctoral Dissertations. 691. https://doi.org/10.7275/8438271.0 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/691 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DECONSTRUCTION OF THE SACRED, ONTOLOGIES OF MONSTROSITY: APOPHATIC APPROACHES IN LATE MODERNIST CINEMA A Dissertation Presented By SCOTT VANGEL Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2016 Comparative Literature © Copyright by Scott Vangel 2016 All Rights Reserved DECONSTRUCTION OF THE SACRED, ONTOLOGIES OF MONSTROSITY: APOPHATIC APPROACHES IN LATE MODERNIST CINEMA A Dissertation Presented By SCOTT VANGEL Approved as to Style and Content by:
[Show full text]
Frankenstein Movies
SMOKE SIGNALS The Official Publication of the ANKOKAS, NJ Region AACA Sept./Oct.Volume Halloween In This Issue: g Local Halloween Events g Werewolf Movies g Frankenstein Movies g Origins of Superstitions g Face Your Fears Puzzle g Halloween for Younger Viewers g Story of the Jack O’ Lantern g Pumpkin Carving Tips g History of Trick or Treat g Halloween Word Search g Horror Movie Quote Puzzle g The Sound of Terror g Best of Black & White Horror g Roadside Ramblings In This Month’s Issue: Local Halloween Events...................... 1 What is This? Werewolf Movies...... 3 Frankenstein Movies..................... 4 A lot of you might be wondering what Origins of is this new piece of newsletter you’re Superstitions............ 5 getting. The truth is, your editor, in her Face Your Halloween excitement, went a little off the Fears Puzzle............. 6 rails. Maybe a lot. Anyway, due to some Halloween For size constraints, I had to pull almost all of Younger Viewers...... 6 the Halloween content out of the regular Story of the newsletter and put it here, in your Smoke Jack O’ Lantern....... 7 Signals Halloween Supplement. Inside Pumpkin Carving these pages you will find everything you Tips.......................... 7 need to make your Halloween a howling History of good time, including some articles rerun Trick or Treat............ 8 from previous issues (just in case you Halloween Word Search............ 8 forgot them). Horror Movie For me, Halloween has always been a Quote Puzzle............ 9 time when I wasn’t the only weird one. The Sound For at least one day, everyone else was of Terror...................
[Show full text]