Medjugradski Red Voznje

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

MEDJUGRADSKI RED VOŽNJE mjesto vrijeme polaska i prevoznik 03:45 Pljevlja ekspres doo Pljevlja BAR 04:20 Prevoz Pljevlja doo Pljevlja 12:45 Vot-turist, Risti ć-commerce BEOGRAD 16:00 Lasta Beograd, Markoturs Pljevlja 24:00 Markoturs, Risti ć-commerce BIJELO 05:00 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja POLJE 14:34 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja 04:15 Vot-turist Pljevlja 12:05 Vot-turist Pljevlja BUDVA 14:50 Vot-turist Pljevlja 15:00 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja 04:15 Vot-turist Pljevlja 12:05 Vot-turist Pljevlja CETINJE 14:50 Vot-turist Pljevlja 15:00 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja 12:45 Vot-turist, Risti ć-commerce ČAČAK 16:00 Lasta Beograd, Markoturs Pljevlja 24:00 Markoturs, Risti ć-commerce ČAJNI ČE 07:00 In-turist Pljevlja GORAŽDE 07:00 In-turist Pljevlja GORNJI 12:45 Vot-turist, Risti ć-commerce 16:00 Lasta Beograd, Markoturs Pljevlja MILANOVAC 24:00 Markoturs, Risti ć-commerce HERCEG 04:15 Vot-turist Pljevlja NOVI 15:00 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja 03:45 Pljevlja ekspres doo Pljevlja 04:15 Vot-turist Pljevlja 04:20 Prevoz Pljevlja doo Pljevlja KOLAŠIN 06:25 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja 12:05 Vot-turist Pljevlja 14:50 Vot-turist Pljevlja 15:00 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja KOTOR 12:05 Vot-turist Pljevlja KULA 12:45 Vot-turist, Risti ć-commerce 03:45 Pljevlja – ekspres doo Pljevlja 04:15 Vot-turist Pljevlja 04:20 Prevoz Pljevlja doo Pljevlja MOJKOVAC 06:25 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja 12:05 Vot-turist Pljevlja 14:50 Vot-turist Pljevlja 15:00 Radulovi ć prevoz Pljevlja 10:00 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja NIKŠI Ć 11:20 Staniši ć doo Nikši ć 14:55 Radulovi ć prevoz Pljevlja NOVA 12:45 Vot-turist, Risti ć-commerce 16:00 Lasta Beograd, Markoturs Pljevlja VAROŠ 24:00 Markoturs, Risti ć-commerce NOVI SAD 12:45 Vot-turist, Risti ć-commerce 03:45 Pljevlja – ekspres doo Pljevlja 04:15 Vot-turist Pljevlja 04:20 Prevoz Pljevlja doo Pljevlja 06:25 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja PODGORICA 10:00 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja 11:20 Staniši ć doo Nikši ć 12:05 Vot-turist Pljevlja 14:50 Vot-turist Pljevlja 15:00 Radulovi ć prevoz Pljevlj ć 12:45 Vot-turist, Risti -commerce 16:00 Lasta Beograd, Markoturs Pljevlja POŽEGA 24:00 Markoturs, Risti ć-commerce JANJUŠEVI Ć AD PRIBOJ 12:30 utorak, srijeda, četvrtak PRIBOJ 15:00 ponedeljak, petak, subota 16:00 nedelja 12:45 Vot-turist, Risti ć-commerce PRIJEPOLJE 16:00 Lasta Beograd, Markoturs Pljevlja 24:00 Markoturs, Risti ć-commerce SARAJEVO 07:00 In-turist Pljevlja SOMBOR 12:45 Vot-turist, Risti ć-commerce 10:00 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja ŠAVNIK 11:20 Staniši ć doo Nikši ć 14:55 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja 04:15 Vot-turist Pljevlja 12:05 Vot-turist Pljevlja TIVAT 14:50 Vot-turist Pljevlja 15:00 Radulovi ć prevoz doo Pljevlja VRBAS 12:45 Vot-turist, Risti ć-commerce 10:00 Radulovi ć prevoz Pljevlja ŽABLJAK 11:20 Staniši ć Nikši ć 14:55 Radulovi ć prevoz Pljevlja .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

BIRN – Balkan Insight Disappointed Serbs Sell up and Go
BIRN – Balkan Insight Disappointed Serbs Sell Up And Go 23 06 2006 Angry over the referendum result and fearful for the future, many Serbs are emigrating to central Serbia. By Bojana Stanisic in Pljevlja (Balkan Insight, 23 June 06) The villagers of Seoce, near Andrijevica, in northern Montenegro, are angry. The reason is the outcome of the May 21 referendum on independence, which Montenegrin separatists won by a large margin. Such is the indignation in Seoce, which voted "en masse" against sovereignty, that many locals have decided to sell up and emigrate to Sumadija, in central Serbia. They plan to move the whole village over the border and rename their new home Seoce. Villagers have made it clear that if any one buyer is interested in buying up the entire village, they would offer a substantial discount of up to 15 per cent. One would-be ex-Montenegrin is Stanoje Stijovic. "As soon as I sell my property I will move to Serbia," he said. "We plan to buy a whole village in Serbia and rename it Seoce out of love for our native land." The villagers protest that their departure is not a sign of indifference to the place many were born in, and in which many invested all their savings. "I invested my entire capital in my native village," said Vujica Mitrovic, who came all the way from Denmark, where he works, to vote in the referendum. "But I am deeply disappointed with the result, which is why I have decided to sell my whole estate - three houses in Andrijevica, a house in Seoce, another in Sutomore on the Adriatic coast and a country home in the Balja Mountain." Thirty-five villagers from Beranselo, near the town Berani in the north of Montenegro, have also put up their land and houses for sale, hoping for Albanian buyers.
[Show full text]
Bosnia and Herzegovina Country Handbook 1
Bosnia and Herzegovina Country Handbook 1. This handbook provides basic reference information on Bosnia and Herzegovina, including its geography, history, government, military forces, and communications and transportation networks. This information is intended to familiarize military personnel with local customs and area knowledge to assist them during their assignment to Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2. This product is published under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Defense Intelligence Production Program (DoDIPP) with the Marine Corps Intelligence Activity designated as the community coordinator for the Country Handbook Program. This product reflects the coordinated U.S. Defense Intelligence Community position on Bosnia and Herzegovina. 3. Dissemination and use of this publication is restricted to official military and government personnel from the United States of America, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, NATO member countries, and other countries as required and designated for support of coalition operations. 4. The photos and text reproduced herein have been extracted solely for research, comment, and information reporting, and are intended for fair use by designated personnel in their official duties, including local reproduction for training. Further dissemination of copyrighted material contained in this document, to include excerpts and graphics, is strictly prohibited under Title 17, U.S. Code. Contents KEY FACTS. 1 U.S. MISSION . 2 U.S. Embassy. 2 U.S. Consulate . 2 Entry Requirements . 3 Currency . 3 Customs . 3 GEOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE . 4 Geography . 4 Topography . 5 Vegetation . 8 Effects on Military Operations . 9 Climate. 10 TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION . 13 Transportation . 13 Roads . 13 Rail . 15 Air . 16 Maritime . 17 Communication . 18 Radio and Television . 18 Telephone and Telegraph .
[Show full text]
TA-MON-02 FS 400 Kv Dalekovod Lastva Grbaljska
Albani ja Bosn a i Hrvatska BJR Mak edoni ja Kosovo Crna Gora Srbija Hercegovina Infrastrukturni projekat Zapadnog Balkana TA-MON-02 FS 400 kV Dalekovod Lastva Grbaljska - Pljevlja Procjena uticaja na društvo i životnu sredinu - Plan angažovanja zainteresovanih strana - Decembar 2011. godine TA-MON-02 Decembar 2011 400 kV dalekovod Lastva Grbaljska – Pljevlja WYG International Ltd SEP – 400 kV dalekovod Lastva Grbaljska - Pljevlja 2 Izvještaj o projektu Naslov projekta: 400 kV DALEKOVOD LASTVA GRBALJSKA - PLJEVLJA Broj projekta: TA-MON-02 Naslov izvještaja: PLAN ANGAŽOVANJA ZAINTERESOVANIH STRANA Broj: DRAFT- 03 Revizija 1 2 3 12. decembar 2011. Datum 30. oktobar 2011.god 30. novembar 2011. god god Detalj Konstantin Siderovski, Konstantin Siderovski, Konstantin Siderovski, Pripremio MSc MSc MSc Garth Entwistle Garth Entwistle Garth Entwistle Božidar Radović / Božidar Radović / Božidar Radović / Provjerio Martyn Osborn Martyn Osborn Martyn Osborn Odobrio TA-MON-02 Decembar 2011 400 kV dalekovod Lastva Grbaljska – Pljevlja WYG International Ltd SEP – 400 kV dalekovod Lastva Grbaljska - Pljevlja 3 Sadržaj: Skraćenice ............................................................................................................................. 4 Uvod ............................................................................................................................. 5 1 Lokacija projekta………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…7 2 Zahjtevi za angažovanjem zainteresovanih strana ..................................................................
[Show full text]
Strategy for the Integration of Persons with Disabilities in Montenegro
INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTION PLAN FOR REALIZATION OF STRATEGY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN MONTENEGRO FOR 2010 Podgorica, February 2011. INTRODUCTION The Government of Montenegro adopted in December 2007 the Strategy for integration of persons with disabilities in Montenegro, for the period from 2008. to 2016. This document comprises the following areas: health care, social protection and pension disability insurance, field of education, professional training and employment, accessibility, culture, sport and recreation, as well as the field related to the position of disabled people’s organizations in civil society. The Strategy envisages measures and activities to be undertaken during the aforementioned period, in order to make the position of persons with disability in Montenegro in accordance with the European standards and standards prescribed by the UN Convention on rights of person with disabilities. The Government of Montenegro in 2008. also adopted the Action plan I for 2008. and 2009., which defines priority activities to be implemented in all the above stated fields, while in 2010. it adopted the Action plan II for 2010. and 2011. Also, since 2009. the Government of Montenegro each year has adopted annual reports on realization of measures envisaged for the previous year. In creation of the Report on implementation of the Strategy for integration of persons with disabilities for 2010., also participated an inter-sectoral comprising of, besides representatives of relevant ministries, representatives of NGO dealing with disabled people issues. In this way it was fulfilled a necessity to integrate issues related to disabilities in all sectors, as well as to make direct participation of end beneficiaries, in creation of the policy, while making the strategy and Action plans, and also in monitoring of defined measures and activities.
[Show full text]
Mapping of Sandžak
MAPPING OF SANDŽAK SANDŽAK IN THE REGIONAL CONTEXT: MAPING INFLUENCES AND PROPOSING SOLUTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE SOCIO-POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT IN SANDŽAK Belgrade, June 2017 The views expressed in this Policy Paper are those of the author(s) and should not be attributed to the Embassy of the Netherlands 2 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS The present policy paper has been prepared in the framework of the project "Sandžak in a Regional Context - Mapping Influences and Proposing Solutions for Improvement of the Socio-Political Development in Sandžak", funded by the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands to Serbia. Members of the research project team who were involved in writing the policy paper are: Dušan Janjić, PhD, head of team; Sarina Bakić, MSc; Nebojša Čagorović, PhD; Marija Krstić – Draško; Nadxmedin Spahiu, PhD; Safuadan Plojović, PhD, and Mirjana Rašević, PhD. The main objective of the policy paper is to examine and depict basic trends and features of life in Sandžak, including practices and ceremonies (social gatherings and/or celebrations); institutions and policies that contribute to preserving a concept of "Sandžak"; socio-cultural phenomena and social structures that existed in the past, or exist now or those that can be developed in the future. It is our intention to shed light on the topic of Sandžak; to encourage public debate, i.e. namely to map, inscribe and unveil the Sandžak region on the map of the Western Balkans, and especially of Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo; to identify current issues and chart path to the future; to examine whether this could be the "common European future"; and to elaborate the importance of normalization of life in the Western Balkans and mutual relations between the peoples and countries in this region, and thus the normalization of regional cooperation.
[Show full text]
Dear Mr Kopač, Montenegro Has Recently Reported Its 2020 Operating Data to the European Environment Agency As Required Under Th
Dear Mr Kopač, Montenegro has recently reported its 2020 operating data to the European Environment Agency as required under the Energy Community Treaty.1 The data shows that the Pljevlja coal plant operated 7,194 hours in 2020. Thus, combined with the operating hours for 2018 and 2019, which amounted to 13,809 hours in total, this brings the plant well beyond the 20,000 hours allowed under its opt-out regime under Decision 2016/19/MC-EnC of the Ministerial Council and into non-compliance with the Energy Community Treaty. We understand that the new Montenegrin government was effectively presented with a fait accompli when it took office at the end of the last year,2 but we do not consider this a sufficient reason for failing to take action to close the plant, particularly given its current level of air pollution. As the Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL) recently reiterated, the plant’s 2016 emissions caused up to 133 premature deaths, 285 cases of bronchitis in children, 2,894 asthma symptom days in asthmatic children, and other health impacts costing up to EUR 3.03 million over the year. 3 In addition to the plant’s health impacts, its continued operation represents a problematic example for other opted-out plants in the region, namely: ● Tuzla 3, Tuzla 4 and Kakanj 5 in Bosnia and Herzegovina ● Morava, Kolubara A А3 (boiler 1), Kolubara A А3 (boilers 3,4,5), and Kolubara А5 in Serbia.4 Thus we underline the need for prompt action by the Secretariat to open a case against Montenegro for failure to comply with the Large Combustion Plants Directive, not only to speed up the resolution of the issue within Montenegro, but also to send a strong signal to Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia that exceeding opt-out hours cannot be tolerated.
[Show full text]
USAID Grant No.: 170-G-00-00-00100-00
International City/County US – Montenegro Partnership for Municipal development Management Association QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT U.S. Montenegro Partnership for Municipal Development USAID Grant No.: 170-G-00-00-00100-00 Grant Period: November 8, 1999 – December 7, 2002 Reporting period: January 1, 2002 – March 30, 2002 USAID Cognizant Technical Officer: William Gelman (Podgorica) I. INTRODUCTION Goals/objectives: The International City/County Management Association (ICMA) established the US – Montenegro Partnership for Municipal Development in November 1999, initially under a one- year grant from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Phase I activities were designed to assist local governments in responding more effectively and efficiently to increased demands on municipal services due to the influx of internally displaced persons from the Kosovo conflict. The ICMA grant, which expanded and was extended until December 2002, now serves as the technical and operational hub for USAID assistance to the local government sector in Montenegro. During Phase II, ICMA offers an integrated package of training and technical interventions designed to: A. Develop and promulgate a new legal framework for fiscal and democratic decentralization and devolution of authority and resources B. Improve municipal financial management skills and practices C. Develop a local government in-service training delivery system to insure sustainable implementation of enacted reforms D. Increase citizen involvement and collaboration in the local government reform process and community affairs Counterparts: Principal counterparts include: (1) the municipalities of Tivat, Kotor, Ulcinj, Cetinje, Niksic, Pljevlja and Berane; (2) Ministries of Justice, Finance, Urban Development and other Republic agencies including Departments of Revenue, Public Works, and Real Estate, (3) the Union of Municipalities of Montenegro and (4) the Montenegro Association of Trainers for Local Government and Public Administration.
[Show full text]
Draft Law on Courts of Montenegro
Strasbourg, 20 October 2014 CDL-REF(2014)043 Engl.Only Opinion no. 790 / 2014 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) DRAFT LAW ON COURTS OF MONTENEGRO This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int 2 CDL-REF(2014)043 DRAFT LAW ON COURTS I BASIC PROVISIONS Scope Article 1 The present Law shall regulate establishment, organisation, and jurisdiction of courts; organisation of work of courts and judicial administration, and other matters of importance for orderly and timely functioning of courts. Judicial Power Article 2 Judicial power shall be exercised by courts established under the present Law. Courts shall decide on legal matters under their jurisdiction in a lawful, objective, and timely manner. Judicial office shall be exercised by judges and lay judges. Accessibility of Courts and Equality of Arms Article 3 Everyone shall have the right to address a court for the purpose of exercising his/her rights. Everyone shall be equal before a court. Publicity Article 4 The work of courts shall be public. Public nature of the work of courts shall be ensured in accordance with law. Impartiality Article 5 Everyone shall have the right to an impartial trial within a reasonable time and to have their legal matter, notwithstanding the parties and the characteristics of the legal matter, heard by a judge to whom the case was allocated randomly. Resources for Work of Courts Article 6 The resources and conditions for work of courts shall be ensured in the budget of Montenegro.
[Show full text]
Montenegro's Contested Identity and the Failure of Yugoslavia
23 ZuZana Poláčková – Pieter C. van Duin independence lost and regained: Montenegro’s contested identity and the failure of Yugoslavia (1918-2006) This article examines the political evolution of Montenegro during the era of Yugoslavia (1918- 1992) and the subsequent years of political conflict that eventually led to the regaining of Montenegrin independence in 2006. The First World War and the formation of the Yugoslav state not only meant the end of independent Montenegro but also the emergence of a new political context in which internal Montenegrin antagonisms were played out. While a considerable proportion of Montenegrin Orthodox Slavs supported the multinational but Serb-dominated Yugoslav state, there was also a growing number of Montenegrins who wanted to restore the country’s autonomous or even independent status. This was implemented to some degree in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia but then was endangered again during the crisis of Yugoslavia in the 1980s and 1990s. In addition there was growing unrest among the Muslim minorities and civil protests against Montenegro’s participation on the side of the Serbs in the Yugoslav wars of the 1990s. The final result was a stronger anti-Serbian stance not only among a part of the general population but also among a significant section of the old political elite. This eventually led to Montenegro regaining independence through a referendum in 2006. However, achieving independence meant that Montenegro’s other serious problems, including corruption, uneven economic development and deficient democratisation, came even more emphatically to the fore. key words: Montenegro; Yugoslavia; national identity; political conflict; religious friction; demo- cratic change introduction ‘The national question permeated every aspect of Yugoslavia’s public life after 1918.
[Show full text]
Serbian and Montenegrin Authorities Have Stepped up Oppression of Non-Serbs in Serbia and Montenegro
May 1994 Vol. 6, Issue 6 Human Rights Abuses of NonNon----SerbsSerbs 111 In Kosovo, Sandñññak and Vojvodina With the world's attention distracted by events in Bosnia-Hercegovina, Serbian and Montenegrin authorities have stepped up oppression of non-Serbs in Serbia and Montenegro. In particular, incidents of police abuse, arbitrary arrests and abuse in detention have been prevalent in the three regions of Serbia and Montenegro in which non-Serbs constitute a majority or significant minority: Kosovo (a province of Serbia which is 90 percent ethnic Albanian), Sandñak (a region of Serbia and Montenegro which is over 50 percent Muslim) and Vojvodina (a province of Serbia which is approximately 19 percent ethnic Hungarian, 5.4 percent Croat and 3.4 percent Slovak).2 The governments of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia3 and Serbia have done little or nothing to curb human rights abuses in their own territory. Instead, the authorities have at times directly participated in the abuse C through direction, control and support of the police, army, paramilitary, and judiciary C and, at other times, condoned the abuse by failing to investigate and prosecute cases of abuse by armed civilians and paramilitary squads. 1 This statement was submitted to the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe on May 6, 1994. 2 Note that approximately 8 percent of Vojvodina's population identified themselves as "Yugoslav" in the 1991 census. 3 "Yugoslavia" refers to the self-proclaimed Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the union of Serbia (including the provinces of Vojvodina and Kosovo) and Montenegro. Although claiming successor status to the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY), the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has not been internationally recognized as a successor state to the SFRY.
[Show full text]
Spisak Naselja
Spisak naselja CRNA GORA ZAVOD ZA STATISTIKU SPISAK NASELJA 1 Zavod za statistiku Crne Gore MONSTAT Spisak naselja ŠIFRA NASELJA NAZIV NASELJA ŠIFRA OPŠTINE OPŠTINE 203564 Andrijevica 20222 Andrijevica 203572 Andželati 20222 Andrijevica 203637 Božići 20222 Andrijevica 203645 Bojovići 20222 Andrijevica 203742 Gnjili Potok 20222 Andrijevica 203807 Gračanica 20222 Andrijevica 203904 Dulipolje 20222 Andrijevica 203912 Đulići 20222 Andrijevica 203939 Zabrđe 20222 Andrijevica 204013 Jošanica 20222 Andrijevica 204048 Košutići 20222 Andrijevica 204056 Kralje 20222 Andrijevica 204099 Kuti 20222 Andrijevica 204145 Gornje Luge 20222 Andrijevica 204188 Rijeka Marsenića 20222 Andrijevica 204226 Oblo Brdo 20222 Andrijevica 204331 Prisoja 20222 Andrijevica 204404 Seoca 20222 Andrijevica 204412 Sjenožeta 20222 Andrijevica 204447 Slatina 20222 Andrijevica 204455 Trepča 20222 Andrijevica 204471 Trešnjevo 20222 Andrijevica 204501 Ulotina 20222 Andrijevica 204510 Cecuni 20222 Andrijevica 200018 Arbnež 20010 Bar 200026 Bar 20010 Bar 200034 Bartula 20010 Bar 200042 Besa 20010 Bar 200069 Bjeliši 20010 Bar 200077 Bobovište 20010 Bar 200085 Boljevići 20010 Bar 200093 Braćeni 20010 Bar 200107 Brijege 20010 Bar 200115 Brca 20010 Bar 200123 Bukovik 20010 Bar 200131 Burtaiši 20010 Bar 200140 Velembusi 20010 Bar 200158 Veliki Mikulići 20010 Bar 200166 Veliki Ostros 20010 Bar 200174 Velja Gorana 20010 Bar 200182 Velje Selo 20010 Bar 200204 Virpazar 20010 Bar 200212 Gluhi Do 20010 Bar 200239 Godinje 20010 Bar 200247 Gornja Briska 20010 Bar 2 Zavod za statistiku Crne
[Show full text]
Clock Towers from the Ottoman Period in the Territory of Today's Montenegro
METUCLOCK-TOWERS JFA 2019/2 FROM THE OTTOMAN PERIOD IN DOI:METU 10.4305/METU.JFA.2019.2.6 JFA 2019/2 1 THE(36:2) TERRITORY 1-28 OF TODAY’S MONTENEGRO CLOCK TOWERS FROM THE OTTOMAN PERIOD IN THE TERRITORY OF TODAY’S MONTENEGRO Rifat ALİHODŽİĆ* Received: 01.04.2018; Final Text: 30.09.2019 INTRODUCTION Keywords: Clock towers; Montenegro; Ottoman period; cultural heritage; urban Time measurement dates back to 3000-2000 BCE in Mesopotamia and landmarks. Egypt. Sun-light, water, oil or sand were used to measure time (Acun, 2011, 3). Sundials indicated a position of the shadow on the dial, sandglasses measured the time of sand trickling through a glass-bulb, while water clocks indicated the time of water pouring down from one container to another. First measurements of time by mechanical means, as a precursor of mechanical clocks’ production in Europe, were performed by monks. In certain time intervals, mechanism would produce a sound by hitting bells, functioning as alarm-clocks, without hands or dials. They appeared in the 13th century in Westminster, England and Padua, Italy (Borstin, 1983, 39-42). Two types of alarm-clocks were manufactured: room alarm-clocks called horologia excitatoria and another type, serving to wake a chief monk, called custosa horologii. He would inform the others by pulling the tower’s great bell. Soon the production began of greater clockwork-mechanisms to be placed on towers near churches, designed to automatically hit bells. Mechanical clocks imposed a new sense to humans: the time human mind had been used to, was turned into a sum of time units, which greatly differed from the impression of smooth flowing of sun rays, water or sand.
[Show full text]