Fractional Weierstrass Function by Application of Jumarie Fractional

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fractional Weierstrass Function by Application of Jumarie Fractional Fractional Weierstrass function by application of Jumarie fractional trigonometric functions and its analysis Uttam Ghosh1 , Susmita Sarkar2 and Shantanu Das 3 1 Department of Mathematics, Nabadwip Vidyasagar College, Nabadwip, Nadia, West Bengal, India; email : [email protected] 2Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India email : [email protected] 3Scientist H+, Reactor Control Systems Design Section E & I Group BARC Mumbai India Senior Research Professor, Dept. of Physics, Jadavpur University Kolkata Adjunct Professor. DIAT-Pune UGC Visiting Fellow. Dept of Appl. Mathematics; Univ. of Calcutta email : [email protected] Abstract The classical example of no-where differentiable but everywhere continuous function is Weierstrass function. In this paper we define the fractional order Weierstrass function in terms of Jumarie fractional trigonometric functions. The Holder exponent and Box dimension of this function are calculated here. It is established that the Holder exponent and Box dimension of this fractional order Weierstrass function are the same as in the original Weierstrass function, independent of incorporating the fractional trigonometric function. This is new development in generalizing the classical Weierstrass function by usage of fractional trigonometric function and obtain its character and also of fractional derivative of fractional Weierstrass function by Jumarie fractional derivative, and establishing that roughness index are invariant to this generalization. Keywords Holder exponent, fractional Weierstrass function, Box dimension, Jumarie fractional derivative, Jumarie fractional trigonometric function. 1.0 Introduction Fractional geometry, fractional dimension is an important branch of science to study the irregularity of a function, graph or signals [1-3]. On the other hand fractional calculus is another developing mathematical tool to study the continuous but non-differentiable functions (signals) where the conventional calculus fails [4-11]. Many authors are trying to relate between the fractional derivative and fractional dimension [1, 12-15]. The functions which are continuous but non-differentiable in integer order calculus can be characterized in terms of fractional calculus and especially through Holder exponent [10, 16]. To study the no-where differentiable functions authors in [12-16] used different type of fractional derivatives. Jumarie [17] defines the fractional trigonometric functions in terms of Mittag-Leffler function and established different useful fractional trigonometric formulas. The fractional order derivatives of those functions were established in-terms the Jumarie [17-18] modified fractional order derivatives. In this paper we define the fractional order Weierstrass functions in terms the fractional order sine function. The Holder exponent, box-dimension (Fractional dimension) of graph of this function is obtained here; also the fractional order derivative of this function is established here. This is new 1 development in generalizing the classical Weierstrass function by usage of fractional trigonometric function and obtain its character. The paper is organized as sections; with section-2 dealing with describing Jumarie fractional derivative and Mittag-Leffler function of one and two parameter type, fractional trigonometric function of one and two parameter type and their Jumarie fractional derivatives are derived. In this section we derived useful relations of fractional trigonometric function that we shall be using for our calculations-in characterizing fractional Weierstrass function. We continue this section by introducing Lipschitz Holder exponent (LHE)- its definition, its relation to Hurst exponent and fractional dimension and definition of Holder continuity, and we define here the classical Weierstrass function. These parameters are basic parameter to indicate roughness index of a function or graph. In section-3 we describe the fractional Weierstrass function by generalizing the classical Weierstrass function by use of fractional sine trigonometric function. Subsequently we apply derived identities of fractional trigonometric functions to evaluate the properties of this new fractional Weierstrass function. In section-4 we do derivation of properties of fractional derivative of fractional Weierstrass function, and conclude the paper with conclusion and references. 2.0 Jumarie fractional order derivative and Mittag-Leffler Function a) Fractional order derivative of Jumarie Type Jumarie [17] defined the fractional order derivative modifying the Left Riemann-Liouvellie (RL) fractional derivative in the form for the function f ()x in the interval a to x , with fx()= 0for x < a . x ⎧ 1 −−α 1 ⎪ ()xfd−<τττα (), 0. Γ−()α ∫ ⎪ a ⎪ 1 d x J Dfxαα()=−−(xττ )− f () fad () τ , 0< α< 1 ax[]⎨ ∫ [] ⎪Γ−(1α ) dx a ()m ⎪ ()α −m ⎪()fx() , m≤<+α m1. ⎩⎪ In the above definition, the first expression is just Riemann-Liouvelli fractional integration; the second line is Riemann-Liouvelli fractional derivative of order 0<<α 1 of offset function that is f ()xfa− (). Forα >1, we use the third line; that is first we differentiate the offset function with order 0(<−α m )1<, by the formula of second line, and then apply whole m order differentiation to it. Here we chose integer m , just less than the real J α numberα ; that is m≤<α m+1. In this paper we use symbol 0 Dx to denote Jumarie fractional derivative operator, as defined above. In case the start point value f (a) is un- defined there we take finite part of the offset function as f ()xf− (a+ ) ; for calculations. Note α in the above Jumarie definition 0 DCx [ ] = 0 , where C is constant function, otherwise in RL α x−α sense, the fractional derivative of a constant function is 0 DCx [ ] = CΓ−(1 α ) , that is a decaying 2 power-law function. Also we purposely state that fx( )= 0 for x < 0 in order to have initialization function in case of fractional differ-integration to be zero, else results are difficult [9]. b) Mittag-Leffler Function The Mittag-Leffler function [19- 22] of one parameter is denoted by Eα (x) and defined by ∞ xk Exα ()= ∑ (1) k =0 Γ+(1 kα) This function plays a crucial role in classical calculus forα =1, for α =1it becomes the exponential function, that is exp(x )= Ex1 ( ) ∞ xk exp(x ) = ∑ (2) k =0 k! α Like the exponential function; Eα ()x play important role in fractional calculus. The function α α Eα ()x is a fundamental solution of the Jumarie type fractional differential equation 0 Dyy [ ] = y, α where 0 Dx is Jumarie derivative operator as described above. The other important function is the two parameter Mittag-Leffler function is denoted Eαβ, ()x and defined by following series ∞ xk Exαβ, ()= ∑ (3) k =0 Γ+()βαk The functions (1) and (3) play important role in fractional calculus, also we note that ExExαα,1 ()= (). Again from Jumarie definition of fractional derivative we have J Dα 10and J Dxα ⎡⎤β= Γ+(1β ) xβ−α. We now consider the Mittag-Leffler function in the 0 x [ ] = 0 x ⎣⎦Γ+−(1βα ) α following form in infinite series representation for f ()xEx= α ( )for x ≥ 0 and fx( )= 0 for x < 0 as; xxααα23x Ex(α )=+ 1 + + +... α Γ+(1)(12ααα Γ+ )(13Γ+ ) Then taking Jumarie fractional derivative of order 0< α <1term by term for the above series we obtain the following by using the formula J Dxα ⎡⎤ββ= Γ+(1β ) x−αand J Dα 10= 0 x ⎣⎦Γ+−(1βα ) 0 x [ ] ⎡ axααα a22 x a33 x ⎤ JJααα⎡⎤ 00DEaxxx⎣⎦α ( )=+ D⎢ 1 + + +...⎥ ⎣ Γ+(1αα ) Γ+ (1 2 )Γ+ (1 3α ) ⎦ ax23ααax2 ax43α =++0 a + + +... Γ+(1)(12)(13)ααα Γ+ Γ+ α = aEα () ax 3 Again we derive Jumarie derivative of order β for one parameter Mittag-Leffler function α Exα ()and thereby get two parameter Mittag-Leffler function. Here also we use for term by term Jumarie derivative J Dxα ⎡⎤υυ= Γ+(1υ ) x−αand J Dα 10= . 0 x ⎣⎦Γ+−(1υα ) 0 x [ ] ⎡ xxααα23 x⎤ JJβα⎡⎤ β 00DExxx⎣⎦α ( )=+ D⎢ 1 + + +...⎥ ⎣ Γ+(1)(12)(13)ααα Γ+ Γ+ ⎦ xxαβ−−−23αβ xαβ =+0 + + +... Γ+(1)(12)(13)αβ − Γ+ αβ − Γ+ αβ − αβ− α = xEαα,1−+ β () x Jumarie [18] defined the fractional sine and cosine function in the following form def ααα Eixααα()cos()sin()=+ x i x def ∞ 2kα α k x cosα (x )=−∑ ( 1) k=0 Γ+(1 2αk ) def ∞ (2k+ 1)α α k x sinα (x )=−∑ ( 1) k=0 Γ++()1(12)k α 0.7 0.7 1.2 1 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.4 (x) in S (x) (x) in in 0.4 S 0.3 S 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 0.1 0.1 -0.2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 x 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 x x For α = 0.8 For α = 0.4 For α = 0.6 1 8 40 0.8 35 6 0.6 30 25 0.4 4 20 0.2 (x) (x) ) 2 15 in in (x S 0 S in S 10 -0.2 0 5 -0.4 0 -2 -0.6 -5 -0.8 -4 -10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -1 x 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 x x For For α = 1.0 α = 1.2 For α = 1.4 α Fig.1 Graph ofsinα ()x 1 1.2 1 0.9 1 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.6 s(x) 0.5 s(x) os(x) Co Co 0.4 C 0.4 0 0.3 0.2 0.2 0 0.1 0 -0.2 -0.5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 x x x For α = 0.4 For α = 0.6 For α = 0.8 1 6 20 0.8 4 10 0.6 2 0 0.4 0 -10 0.2 s(x) (x) -2 -20 0 Co s(x) Cos -0.2 Co -4 -30 -0.4 -6 -40 -0.6 -8 -50 -0.8 -10 -60 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 x x -12 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 x For For α = 1.4 α = 1.0 For α = 1.2 α Fig.2 Graph of cosα (x ) 4 From figure-1 and 2 it is observed that for α <1both the fractional trigonometric functions α α sinα (x ) and cosα (x ) is decaying functions like damped oscillatory motion.
Recommended publications
  • Halloweierstrass
    Happy Hallo WEIERSTRASS Did you know that Weierestrass was born on Halloween? Neither did we… Dmitriy Bilyk will be speaking on Lacunary Fourier series: from Weierstrass to our days Monday, Oct 31 at 12:15pm in Vin 313 followed by Mesa Pizza in the first floor lounge Brought to you by the UMN AMS Student Chapter and born in Ostenfelde, Westphalia, Prussia. sent to University of Bonn to prepare for a government position { dropped out. studied mathematics at the M¨unsterAcademy. University of K¨onigsberg gave him an honorary doctor's degree March 31, 1854. 1856 a chair at Gewerbeinstitut (now TU Berlin) professor at Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universit¨atBerlin (now Humboldt Universit¨at) died in Berlin of pneumonia often cited as the father of modern analysis Karl Theodor Wilhelm Weierstrass 31 October 1815 { 19 February 1897 born in Ostenfelde, Westphalia, Prussia. sent to University of Bonn to prepare for a government position { dropped out. studied mathematics at the M¨unsterAcademy. University of K¨onigsberg gave him an honorary doctor's degree March 31, 1854. 1856 a chair at Gewerbeinstitut (now TU Berlin) professor at Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universit¨atBerlin (now Humboldt Universit¨at) died in Berlin of pneumonia often cited as the father of modern analysis Karl Theodor Wilhelm Weierstraß 31 October 1815 { 19 February 1897 born in Ostenfelde, Westphalia, Prussia. sent to University of Bonn to prepare for a government position { dropped out. studied mathematics at the M¨unsterAcademy. University of K¨onigsberg gave him an honorary doctor's degree March 31, 1854. 1856 a chair at Gewerbeinstitut (now TU Berlin) professor at Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universit¨atBerlin (now Humboldt Universit¨at) died in Berlin of pneumonia often cited as the father of modern analysis Karl Theodor Wilhelm Weierstraß 31 October 1815 { 19 February 1897 sent to University of Bonn to prepare for a government position { dropped out.
    [Show full text]
  • On Fractal Properties of Weierstrass-Type Functions
    Proceedings of the International Geometry Center Vol. 12, no. 2 (2019) pp. 43–61 On fractal properties of Weierstrass-type functions Claire David Abstract. In the sequel, starting from the classical Weierstrass function + 8 n n defined, for any real number x, by (x) = λ cos (2 π Nb x), where λ W n=0 ÿ and Nb are two real numbers such that 0 λ 1, Nb N and λ Nb 1, we highlight intrinsic properties of curious mapsă ă which happenP to constituteą a new class of iterated function system. Those properties are all the more interesting, in so far as they can be directly linked to the computation of the box dimension of the curve, and to the proof of the non-differentiabilty of Weierstrass type functions. Анотація. Метою даної роботи є узагальнення попередніх результатів автора про класичну функцію Вейерштрасса та її графік. Його можна отримати як границю послідовності префракталів, тобто графів, отри- маних за допомогою ітераційної системи функцій, які, як правило, не є стискаючими відображеннями. Натомість вони мають в деякому сенсі еквівалентну властивість до стискаючих відображень, оскільки на ко- жному етапі ітераційного процесу, який дає змогу отримати префра- ктали, вони зменшують двовимірні міри Лебега заданої послідовності прямокутників, що покривають криву. Такі системи функцій відіграють певну роль на першому кроці процесу побудови підкови Смейла. Вони можуть бути використані для доведення недиференційованості функції Вейєрштрасса та обчислення box-розмірності її графіка, а також для по- будови більш широких класів неперервних, але ніде не диференційовних функцій. Останнє питання ми вивчатимемо в подальших роботах. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 37F20, 28A80, 05C63 Keywords: Weierstrass function; non-differentiability; iterative function systems DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15673/tmgc.v12i2.1485 43 44 Cl.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous Nowhere Differentiable Functions
    2003:320 CIV MASTER’S THESIS Continuous Nowhere Differentiable Functions JOHAN THIM MASTER OF SCIENCE PROGRAMME Department of Mathematics 2003:320 CIV • ISSN: 1402 - 1617 • ISRN: LTU - EX - - 03/320 - - SE Continuous Nowhere Differentiable Functions Johan Thim December 2003 Master Thesis Supervisor: Lech Maligranda Department of Mathematics Abstract In the early nineteenth century, most mathematicians believed that a contin- uous function has derivative at a significant set of points. A. M. Amp`ereeven tried to give a theoretical justification for this (within the limitations of the definitions of his time) in his paper from 1806. In a presentation before the Berlin Academy on July 18, 1872 Karl Weierstrass shocked the mathematical community by proving this conjecture to be false. He presented a function which was continuous everywhere but differentiable nowhere. The function in question was defined by ∞ X W (x) = ak cos(bkπx), k=0 where a is a real number with 0 < a < 1, b is an odd integer and ab > 1+3π/2. This example was first published by du Bois-Reymond in 1875. Weierstrass also mentioned Riemann, who apparently had used a similar construction (which was unpublished) in his own lectures as early as 1861. However, neither Weierstrass’ nor Riemann’s function was the first such construction. The earliest known example is due to Czech mathematician Bernard Bolzano, who in the years around 1830 (published in 1922 after being discovered a few years earlier) exhibited a continuous function which was nowhere differen- tiable. Around 1860, the Swiss mathematician Charles Cell´erieralso discov- ered (independently) an example which unfortunately wasn’t published until 1890 (posthumously).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1901.11134V3
    Infinite series representation of fractional calculus: theory and applications Yiheng Weia, YangQuan Chenb, Qing Gaoc, Yong Wanga,∗ aDepartment of Automation, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China bSchool of Engineering, University of California, Merced, Merced, 95343, USA cThe Institute for Automatic Control and Complex Systems, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg 47057, Germany Abstract This paper focuses on the equivalent expression of fractional integrals/derivatives with an infinite series. A universal framework for fractional Taylor series is developedby expandingan analyticfunction at the initial instant or the current time. The framework takes into account of the Riemann–Liouville definition, the Caputo definition, the constant order and the variable order. On this basis, some properties of fractional calculus are confirmed conveniently. An intuitive numerical approximation scheme via truncation is proposed subsequently. Finally, several illustrative examples are presented to validate the effectiveness and practicability of the obtained results. Keywords: Taylor series; fractional calculus; singularity; nonlocality; variable order. 1. Introduction Taylor series has intensively developed since its introduction in 300 years ago and is nowadays a mature research field. As a powerful tool, Taylor series plays an essential role in analytical analysis and numerical calculation of a function. Interestingly, the classical Taylor series has been tied to another 300-year history tool, i.e., fractional calculus. This combination produces many promising and potential applications [1–4]. The original idea on fractional generalized Taylor series can be dated back to 1847, when Riemann formally used a series structure to formulate an analytic function [5]. This series was not proven and the related manuscript probably never intended for publishing.
    [Show full text]
  • A Generalized Fractional Power Series for Solving a Class of Nonlinear Fractional Integro-Differential Equation
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 25 September 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201809.0476.v1 Article A Generalized Fractional Power Series for Solving a Class of Nonlinear Fractional Integro-Differential Equation Sirunya Thanompolkrang 1and Duangkamol Poltem 1,2,* 1 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Burapha University, Chonburi, 20131, Thailand; [email protected] 2 Centre of Excellence in Mathematics, Commission on Higher Education, Ministry of Education, Bangkok 10400, Thailand * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +6-638-103-099 Version September 25, 2018 submitted to Preprints 1 Abstract: In this paper, we investigate an analytical solution of a class of nonlinear fractional 2 integro-differential equation base on a generalized fractional power series expansion. The fractional 3 derivatives are described in the conformable’s type. The new approach is a modified form of the 4 well-known Taylor series expansion. The illustrative examples are presented to demonstrate the 5 accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed method. 6 Keywords: fractional power series; integro-differential equations; conformable derivative 7 1. Introduction 8 Fractional calculus and fractional differential equations are widely explored subjects thanks 9 to the great importance of scientific and engineering problems. For example, fractional calculus 10 is applied to model the fluid-dynamic traffics [1], signal processing [2], control theory [3], and 11 economics [4]. For more details and applications about fractional derivative, we refer the reader 12 to [5–8]. Many mathematical formulations contain nonlinear integro-differential equations with 13 fractional order. However, the integro-differential equations are usually difficult to solve analytically, 14 so it is required to obtain an efficient approximate solution.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is... Fractional Calculus?
    What is... Fractional Calculus? Clark Butler August 6, 2009 Abstract Differentiation and integration of non-integer order have been of interest since Leibniz. We will approach the fractional calculus through the differintegral operator and derive the differintegrals of familiar functions from the standard calculus. We will also solve Abel's integral equation using fractional methods. The Gr¨unwald-Letnikov Definition A plethora of approaches exist for derivatives and integrals of arbitrary order. We will consider only a few. The first, and most intuitive definition given here was first proposed by Gr¨unwald in 1867, and later Letnikov in 1868. We begin with the definition of a derivative as a difference quotient, namely, d1f f(x) − f(x − h) = lim dx1 h!0 h It is an exercise in induction to demonstrate that, more generally, n dnf 1 X n = lim (−1)j f(x − jh) dxn h!0 hn j j=0 We will assume that all functions described here are sufficiently differen- tiable. Differentiation and integration are often regarded as inverse operations, so d−1 we wish now to attach a meaning to the symbol dx−1 , what might commonly be referred to as anti-differentiation. However, integration of a function is depen- dent on the lower limit of integration, which is why the two operations cannot be regarded as truly inverse. We will select a definitive lower limit of 0 for convenience, so that, d−nf Z x Z xn−1 Z x2 Z x1 −n ≡ dxn−1 dxn−2 ··· dx1 f(x0)dx0 dx 0 0 0 0 1 By instead evaluating this multiple intgral as the limit of a sum, we find n N−1 d−nf x X j + n − 1 x = lim f(x − j ) dx−n N!1 N j N j=0 in which the interval [0; x] has been partitioned into N equal subintervals.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathological” Functions and Their Classes
    Properties of “Pathological” Functions and their Classes Syed Sameed Ahmed (179044322) University of Leicester 27th April 2020 Abstract This paper is meant to serve as an exposition on the theorem proved by Richard Aron, V.I. Gurariy and J.B. Seoane in their 2004 paper [2], which states that ‘The Set of Dif- ferentiable but Nowhere Monotone Functions (DNM) is Lineable.’ I begin by showing how certain properties that our intuition generally associates with continuous or differen- tiable functions can be wrong. This is followed by examples of functions with surprisingly unintuitive properties that have appeared in mathematical literature in relatively recent times. After a brief discussion of some preliminary concepts and tools needed for the rest of the paper, a construction of a ‘Continuous but Nowhere Monotone (CNM)’ function is provided which serves as a first concrete introduction to the so called “pathological functions” in this paper. The existence of such functions leaves one wondering about the ‘Differentiable but Nowhere Monotone (DNM)’ functions. Therefore, the next section of- fers a description of how the 2004 paper by the three authors shows that such functions are very abundant and not mere fancy counter-examples that can be called “pathological.” 1Introduction A wide variety of assumptions about the nature of mathematical objects inform our intuition when we perform calculations. These assumptions have their utility because they help us perform calculations swiftly without being over skeptical or neurotic. The problem, however, is that it is not entirely obvious as to which assumptions are legitimate and can be rigorously justified and which ones are not.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL SURVEY SOME PIONEERS of the APPLICATIONS of FRACTIONAL CALCULUS Duarte Valério 1, José Tenreiro Machado 2, Virginia
    HISTORICAL SURVEY SOME PIONEERS OF THE APPLICATIONS OF FRACTIONAL CALCULUS Duarte Val´erio 1,Jos´e Tenreiro Machado 2, Virginia Kiryakova 3 Abstract In the last decades fractional calculus (FC) became an area of intensive research and development. This paper goes back and recalls important pio- neers that started to apply FC to scientific and engineering problems during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Those we present are, in alphabet- ical order: Niels Abel, Kenneth and Robert Cole, Andrew Gemant, Andrey N. Gerasimov, Oliver Heaviside, Paul L´evy, Rashid Sh. Nigmatullin, Yuri N. Rabotnov, George Scott Blair. MSC 2010 : Primary 26A33; Secondary 01A55, 01A60, 34A08 Key Words and Phrases: fractional calculus, applications, pioneers, Abel, Cole, Gemant, Gerasimov, Heaviside, L´evy, Nigmatullin, Rabotnov, Scott Blair 1. Introduction In 1695 Gottfried Leibniz asked Guillaume l’Hˆopital if the (integer) order of derivatives and integrals could be extended. Was it possible if the order was some irrational, fractional or complex number? “Dream commands life” and this idea motivated many mathematicians, physicists and engineers to develop the concept of fractional calculus (FC). Dur- ing four centuries many famous mathematicians contributed to the theo- retical development of FC. We can list (in alphabetical order) some im- portant researchers since 1695 (see details at [1, 2, 3], and posters at http://www.math.bas.bg/∼fcaa): c 2014 Diogenes Co., Sofia pp. 552–578 , DOI: 10.2478/s13540-014-0185-1 SOME PIONEERS OF THE APPLICATIONS . 553 • Abel, Niels Henrik (5 August 1802 - 6 April 1829), Norwegian math- ematician • Al-Bassam, M. A. (20th century), mathematician of Iraqi origin • Cole, Kenneth (1900 - 1984) and Robert (1914 - 1990), American physicists • Cossar, James (d.
    [Show full text]
  • Fractional Calculus
    faculty of mathematics and natural sciences Fractional Calculus Bachelor Project Mathematics October 2015 Student: D.E. Koning First supervisor: Dr. A.E. Sterk Second supervisor: Prof. dr. H.L. Trentelman Abstract This thesis introduces fractional derivatives and fractional integrals, shortly differintegrals. After a short introduction and some preliminaries the Gr¨unwald-Letnikov and Riemann-Liouville approaches for defining a differintegral will be explored. Then some basic properties of differintegrals, such as linearity, the Leibniz rule and composition, will be proved. Thereafter the definitions of the differintegrals will be applied to a few examples. Also fractional differential equations and one method for solving them will be discussed. The thesis ends with some examples of fractional differential equations and applications of differintegrals. CONTENTS Contents 1 Introduction4 2 Preliminaries5 2.1 The Gamma Function........................5 2.2 The Beta Function..........................5 2.3 Change the Order of Integration..................6 2.4 The Mittag-Leffler Function.....................6 3 Fractional Derivatives and Integrals7 3.1 The Gr¨unwald-Letnikov construction................7 3.2 The Riemann-Liouville construction................8 3.2.1 The Riemann-Liouville Fractional Integral.........9 3.2.2 The Riemann-Liouville Fractional Derivative.......9 4 Basic Properties of Fractional Derivatives 11 4.1 Linearity................................ 11 4.2 Zero Rule............................... 11 4.3 Product Rule & Leibniz's Rule................... 12 4.4 Composition............................. 12 4.4.1 Fractional integration of a fractional integral....... 12 4.4.2 Fractional differentiation of a fractional integral...... 13 4.4.3 Fractional integration and differentiation of a fractional derivative........................... 14 5 Examples 15 5.1 The Power Function......................... 15 5.2 The Exponential Function.....................
    [Show full text]
  • Fractional Calculus Approach in the Study of Instability Phenomenon in Fluid Dynamics J
    Palestine Journal of Mathematics Vol. 1(2) (2012) , 95–103 © Palestine Polytechnic University-PPU 2012 FRACTIONAL CALCULUS APPROACH IN THE STUDY OF INSTABILITY PHENOMENON IN FLUID DYNAMICS J. C. Prajapati, A. D. Patel, K. N. Pathak and A. K. Shukla Communicated by Jose Luis Lopez-Bonilla MSC2010 Classifications: 76S05, 35R11, 33E12 . Keywords: Fluid flow through porous media, Laplace transforms, Fourier sine transform, Mittag - Leffler function, Fox-Wright function, Fractional time derivative. Authors are indeed extremely grateful to the referees for valuable suggestions which have helped us improve the paper. Abstract. The work carried out in this paper is an interdisciplinary study of Fractional Calculus and Fluid Me- chanics i.e. work based on Mathematical Physics. The aim of this paper is to generalize the instability phenomenon in fluid flow through porous media with mean capillary pressure by transforming the problem into Fractional partial differential equation and solving it by using Fractional Calculus and Special functions. 1 Introduction and Preliminaries The subject of fractional calculus deals with the investigations of integrals and derivatives of any arbitrary real or complex order, which unify and extend the notions of integer-order derivative and n-fold integral. It has gained importance and popularity during the last four decades or so, mainly due to its vast potential of demonstrated ap- plications in various seemingly diversified fields of science and engineering, such as fluid flow, rheology, diffusion, relaxation, oscillation, anomalous diffusion, reaction-diffusion, turbulence, diffusive transport akin to diffusion, elec- tric networks, polymer physics, chemical physics, electrochemistry of corrosion, relaxation processes in complex systems, propagation of seismic waves, dynamical processes in self-similar and porous structures and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Numerical Methods for Fractional Differential Equations
    Von der Carl-Friedrich-Gauß-Fakultat¨ fur¨ Mathematik und Informatik der Technischen Universitat¨ Braunschweig genehmigte Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) von Marc Weilbeer Efficient Numerical Methods for Fractional Differential Equations and their Analytical Background 1. Referent: Prof. Dr. Kai Diethelm 2. Referent: Prof. Dr. Neville J. Ford Eingereicht: 23.01.2005 Prufung:¨ 09.06.2005 Supported by the US Army Medical Research and Material Command Grant No. DAMD-17-01-1-0673 to the Cleveland Clinic Contents Introduction 1 1 A brief history of fractional calculus 7 1.1 The early stages 1695-1822 . 7 1.2 Abel's impact on fractional calculus 1823-1916 . 13 1.3 From Riesz and Weyl to modern fractional calculus . 18 2 Integer calculus 21 2.1 Integration and differentiation . 21 2.2 Differential equations and multistep methods . 26 3 Integral transforms and special functions 33 3.1 Integral transforms . 33 3.2 Euler's Gamma function . 35 3.3 The Beta function . 40 3.4 Mittag-Leffler function . 42 4 Fractional calculus 45 4.1 Fractional integration and differentiation . 45 4.1.1 Riemann-Liouville operator . 45 4.1.2 Caputo operator . 55 4.1.3 Grunw¨ ald-Letnikov operator . 60 4.2 Fractional differential equations . 65 4.2.1 Properties of the solution . 76 4.3 Fractional linear multistep methods . 83 5 Numerical methods 105 5.1 Fractional backward difference methods . 107 5.1.1 Backward differences and the Grunw¨ ald-Letnikov definition . 107 5.1.2 Diethelm's fractional backward differences based on quadrature .
    [Show full text]
  • F L Fractals What Makes a Fractal?
    FlFractals from Wikipedia: list of fractals by Hausdoff dimension Sierpinski Triangle 3D Cantor Dust Lorenz attractor Coastline of Great Britain Mandelbrot Set What makes a fractal? I’m using 2 references: Fractal Geometry by Kenneth Falconer Encounters with Chaos by Denny Gulick 1) A fractal is a subset of Rn with non integer dimension. Of course thi s mak e no sense wit hout a de fin it ion o f dimens ion. 2) Fractal contains copies of itself at many scales. 3) It is too irregular to be described by traditional language. Mandelbrot coined the term in the late 1970s though many examples were known. "Clouds are not spheres, mountains are not cones, coastlines are not circles, and bark is not smooth, nor does lightning travel in a straight line."(Mandelbrot, 1983). 1 1) Cantor Dust. From the interval [0,1] remove the middle third. Then remove the middle third from the remainingg[ 2 intervals [0,,][,1/3] and [2/3,1]. Keep going with this removal of middle thirds forever ….. You end up with the Cantor dust. Impossible to draw it. We give the first 3 steps. Later we will see the Cantor Dust has box dimension ln2/ln3 ≅ .63. Higher dimension than a point but smaller than an interval. There are many interest ing facts a bout t he Cantor d ust. For example, the set is uncountable, but if you integrate the function that is 1 on the Cantor set and 0 off the set (using the Lebesgue in tegra l), you ge t 0. The Rie mann in tegra l canno t dea l w ith this.
    [Show full text]