<<

COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS

knew him — a reti-

cence that was com- NASA pelling in itself. Always gracious, was nonplussed by the attention he received after 11; he knew that he was simply one among : thousands who made A Life of Flight the landing possible. Regardless, Thomas Dunne: 2014. he carried the weight of that historical mis- sion on his back for more than 40 years. And he did much during his reclusive years after , serving on multiple national stud- ies about for NASA and various presidents. Although some at NASA would have preferred that he gave more public sup- port to the agency’s initiatives, Armstrong’s thoughtful perspective carried weight. I would have appreciated an explanation of the space-policy issues that Armstrong became involved in, as well as a full discussion of his role. Barbree briefly mentions a letter sent by (), Jim ( and ) and Armstrong to US President in response to the ’s impending retirement, but does not fully explain its content. It warned that failure to pursue an aggressive govern- ment spaceflight programme “destines our nation to become one of second- or even third-rate stature”. That debate still rages. It originated in no small measure over whether to maintain the traditional approach to Neil Armstrong trains in a simulator ahead of the Apollo 11 mission. that NASA has taken for 50 years, which Armstrong apparently SPACE SCIENCE backed: owning the vehicles and operat- ing them through contractors. By contrast, those from the ‘new’ space world want to allow private-sector firms to seize the initia- Lunar star tive and pursue entrepreneurial approaches to human spaceflight. Traditionalists believe Roger D. Launius is perplexed by a biography of Neil that the entrepreneurs will sacrifice safety; Armstrong that profiles the missions, not the man. entrepreneurs point to the large, over-budget programmes of the traditionalists. Barbree has the longest tenure of any jour- hatever else Jay Barbree’s Neil But what might a full biography of nalist covering the space programme; his Armstrong: A Life of Flight might Armstrong have explored? First and fore- knowledge is both broad and deep. A more be, it is not a biography of the first most is Armstrong’s multifaceted persona. He personal account of Armstrong would have Wman to walk on the Moon, who died in 2012. spent his life flying, becoming a pilot before he been welcomed by all. As it is, Armstrong Instead, it is an almost mission-by-mission could drive. He was most proud of his naval the man has been best captured in James summary of NASA’s Apollo programme, service during the , when he flew R. Hansen’s First Man: The Life of Neil A. observations on the nature of human space- combat missions from the USS Essex against Armstrong (Simon & Schuster, 2005). The flight throughout the past half century and targets immortalized in the James Michener cooperated with every aspect of a few insightful stories. The anecdotes are novel The Bridges at Toko-Ri (Random House, that book. There will be many other fine detailed and effective, and sometimes illu- 1953). Later, as a research pilot, he flew high- biographies, but it is unlikely that any will be minate larger issues. There are conversations performance aircraft such as the X-15. definitive, given Armstrong’s complexity. ■ with space celebrities, ’ jokes and As an astronaut, Armstrong sought neither debates over the focus of space initiatives. fame nor riches. He could have done anything Roger D. Launius is associate director At the very least, this represents a unique he wished after he completed the Apollo 11 of collections and curatorial affairs at the opportunity to read the details of what some Moon landing mission, yet he chose to teach Smithsonian Institution National Air and astronauts, including Armstrong, might at the University of Space Museum, Washington DC. have been thinking at times in their careers. in . Perhaps no one ever really e-mail: [email protected]

472 | NATURE | VOL 510 | 26 JUNE 2014 © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved