Page 1 !N !N !N !N !N !N !O !N !N !N !H !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !O !N !N !O !N

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Page 1 !N !N !N !N !N !N !O !N !N !N !H !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !O !N !N !O !N Harrington Brook Thompson Brook Sand Brisseette Pond B t y Beach Rd d N ro N d Crystal Lake School o o r e S R k view D r h t W Birc w R h n s o 140 e n l d o e Newell Hill d e l R d SV v ! l r d R r l e Aborn Brook e C 140 A r o t D H S d f V e R r f Crystal Lake W e G r i n e e l rt l a b h o t Skylark Airpark 0 e P c R B e 4 Creamery Brook b o k 1 e Broad Brook i K d S u r ff p K Airport d y C T d w G a R R B p d H Broad Brook Charters Pond d p o r G R R n u ! e i e191 loria L r rr d tS n e D d a c V e L l t g l o i d id l a i R B e t H Hydes Brook h er a o e r R m ld S loc R u k W d D d d o T r B P D H d R d y d R R l a il t u d r H d n r u R t n R a t i g C Benjamin Rd e o R u S h Rd x n t S k D d r o Ellington e k ro k y db d a b Bro E t k s a o d r o t n R r g Harringto n R s o H a b Creamery Brook Pond i n d n S l d i u L R e R R u r e a t a L i d w ld Wells R Airport t d Ladds Pond O K u o R e m g P e h t s n b d e g t r R h Neff Hill l D o S Muddy Brook d s t R Broad Brook Village Brook ay n u o rockw d R r B u s r i o C ! F b c a L n r d n k o B i e e r C B e m T y a White Lot Brook r w f f i W r s P n s l G l M o d t t l L i d x d o a R E n r y t H R y E d AQUIFER PRO TECTIO N AREAS r l r e F e e re R d e b t 83 D R r w S e e R a d R n k R SV w N a r b i O g East Windsor Middle School d y d d o i D o d r d n r G g d rd L H i ea ab o R g r a f n Joel D b ub m rie e f d Sadds Mill Pond ub b R V l e D ! Broad Brook Millpond H ar w r a Dr d d Kendall Hill R t y wood ill R R t m R d W as ind r S E W d i d r S n d d d W k R e u l l k r Trce e b l g r R o Ange i O D W a l d a d R r o d l s r r w d R e e R D B a e rk B d T C i ow R ll Ve rnon, CO NNECTICUT m Wells k b Wi o r a r d n M u t o n a ea l L s s N r a o o d s a t d e Scantic River t ow t e h r l s f o F f livan Farms Rd i B u y Neft Brook Sul B ro r r L R H c ok d C i m R R n d ll r A Bradleys Pond d n R a I d Dr d Goodstein Pond E ot St B tte Dep d rlo H R ha m k roo s C H n y B l a udd l i rv L M l e a y st i M b D r r M K r e R a e t Bradleys Brook l d d ria n r m d e o i D a S d r l R l s R M P Martins Brook e H h K Kimballs Brook opkin ou rc R y s s Rd nt r Rd a S d a r in u ai C h t e on R S k B d l w Roc r C il Highland S kland Dr o Ave i M m e n s B i m o s h u n t e f S Butternut Pond e o S n f a a Grants Brook C C r n d Kibbes Brook d D d H a R e LEGEND r R r p a s Rd d e d k M D M a a n L k R hone R d tal y Rd i rys a e Lake Bonair d Broad Brook r f ll Pioneer D C i r R r R l l d k Hl o R a Par d l 140 Brooks Brook d i te Hwy h ta R i s d S H n Broad Brook Elementary r l O Broad Brook Reservoir M e u ld f e E s llin l r g n o b C R 1 t u Le ve l A Aquife r Prote ction Are a (Final Ad op te d ) 9 on ! T n ider R o Mi r d L l a 1 r r W l Ro J a Am y e d e and e 1 L a Way d D e w R Re e se H one rvoir Ave e Ellington High School t a T s L D te olk o a F n t y W p n G d S e Chestnut Brook ! ail R a l L Dr r i C e 30 n b e r id W n V er Mill aha SV d Le ve l A Aquife r Prote ction Are a (Final) e R r r D i H i oad r 2 G g s g D g d t i R o d S n C e o i a i y r e Hunt l d R R Way v an n merm o p o im Z D e L a g t l d i o r l o o n l w M w e S l ak e a k O o n A 42 t e e D V r Shenipsit Lake Brook R Sh y R l aro e n Ln B W l d o r R d R v B e d d r s Le ve l B Aquife r Prote ction Are a (Pre lim inary) G b e o t o b ak N A e e B R g w r i S R r t n d e a r e s r i h k A S b c Center School B D o W v r r T E L L I N G T O N k b r r n r i e u d d o o m D Grover Brook L m n a g h n Brooks Pond o ! l e R e a e y T P y C P l R t n s e R i d i ase d d r a a F R o E A S T W I N D S O R M ar r A m r D a r O in R C o m e ld S d t e t L d n ter R y a d Rd F Sl R llow a u g Ho T in Fro rm L r la H om Spring Glen Brook er R n Larson Brook b mb d Knofla Pond le a H y Ch are R Libkamans Pond No 1 R Marsh Brook d Rd d on J s d n Stoughton Pond C u h M l Jo e r r m D R s ou l T d l t n e l i t t ie a n a e rf r in S n w Ln e n rsto d r u Ba e h D i R y D Rd ps Libkamans Pond No 2 d s R T i S R p r c Cemetery Brook r M hel d L oo a g P k m i Way d e k d Leela J R n oo a Ryan Dr d R i r l u eli d d t B a m Apoth Su R t s O K ecaries H R ns r n A in all Rd et e D t k Rd s d i g r i d n l P 's a S o l l v o C D e C d w Sugar Hill i t a e W n l n d r D R n e a D C a D e Browns Brook y D e l Skungamaug Marsh r P m d c Q r r R S d E d Heathe ua e R a r l p le t te t l d d r e R s e n Mid t ho W w s i rs r n d r c S R n e R i o e i D on G h e Shanti P at r l t t r E T r P y d t y R P i Charter Marsh Dam n R d s r t h e e D w m e e a a R e d ie l R t R E o llingt e d n c o t on R V i d d R W d c t n r S Windsorville n W i n o s d o R f K a L f a P d i o t r l E z L e W l C l n l Moody Pond e Charter Brook i i y l l 6 L R 286 M i Dr o e idge uis SV8 gh R e d d i H Dr 2 C R Pecks Brook M r l y i r D l r i o in w D t u s H t u H n t A r Ston W ehedge Dr a Cigar Pond t e i e a ll g t n ia i m u a n n t H s S S u d e W S r S Davis Brook t lb R B B a u d u y s Kalis Brook Dr t e a a R R z R k l is d d n d o Belding Brook on a p r D c Pinney Brook B L M S R p l r k Windsorville Pond i Coggswall Pond o a Charter Pond g v r a u g EX PLANATIO N t C i n l T e i le s n p y t M h r a R a p d i e Ketch Brook a d s R C n a r Rd Dr en t ge iew rv R d e Sta W ev A Ce nd B o r idg d Tolla R l West Brook u w R Ridge l r B view Dr e b a D d n A u i n tu r r m k c R n C D R The Aquife r Prote ction Program , ad m iniste re d b y the sp e cific, d e taile d m od e ling of the ground wate r flow agle Dr ha o h d E i s d e d y H g l G e R Paulk Hill Tolland Water Supply Pond r i e l D a S l r Turkey Brook ni R ps a ic l T D d e s E D r e Conne cticut De p artm e nt of Ene rgy & Environm e ntal syste m at the we ll fie ld .
Recommended publications
  • MMI 53 River Street Dam.Pdf
    TOWN OF ACTON JUNE 7, 2019 | ACTON, MA PROPOSAL Studies Related to the Dam Located at 53 River Street June 7, 2019 Mr. John Mangiaratti, Town Manager Town of Acton Town Manager’s Office 472 Main Street Acton, MA 01720 RE: River Street Dam Removal and Fort Pond Brook Restoration Acton, Massachusetts MMI #4458-02 Dear Mr. Mangiaratti: The Milone & MacBroom team of structural engineers, bridge scour experts, geotechnical engineers, and hydraulic engineers are uniquely qualified to design the dam removal, and evaluate the potential upstream and downstream infrastructure impacts associated with the removal of the Dam at River Street to improve ecological functions of the Fort Pond Brook. When reviewing our proposal, we ask that you consider the following: Our team brings expertise and a proven track record of success in dam removal projects throughout New England. Milone & MacBroom professionals have backgrounds in hydrology and hydraulics, engineering design, fisheries expertise, and wetland biology. Our staff also includes invasive species experts, fisheries biologists, and permitting specialists. We also integrate the creative innovation of our extensive in-house team of landscape architects and frequently include passive recreational park features at our dam removal sites. We have the ability to integrate dam removal with the natural site opportunities through careful analysis and planning so that your project is technically sound, environmentally sensitive, and aesthetically pleasing. Our team of experts has performed many dam removal projects throughout New England and the Northeast. Milone and MacBroom are pioneers in the field, having completed our first dam removals in the 1990s. With over 40 constructed dam removal projects, we have completed more than any other design firm in the Northeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2011 Volume 23 Number 4
    HE ABITAT TA newsletter of the Connecticut H Association of Conservation and Inland Wetlands Commissions, Inc. winter 2011 volume 23 number 4 VERNON CONSERVATION COMMISSION IMPLEMENTS TOWN-WIDE INVASIVE AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM by Thomas Ouellette, Vernon Conservation Commission he Town of Vernon, led by the Conservation the Town’s Water Pollution Treatment Facility, and Commission and the Department of Parks then flows more than four miles south to Manchester. Tand Recreation, has been engaged since 2008 Within Vernon, the Hockanum River, which transits in a program to proactively identify, monitor, and industrial, commercial, residential and natural control populations of non-native invasive aquatic environments, is designated by the Connecticut plants within two principal Department of Energy and watersheds, and to plan for their Environmental Protection (DEEP) removal. Concerns relate to as impaired for recreation and for the exclusion of native aquatic habitat for fish, other aquatic life vegetation by proliferating and wildlife. non-native species, and to the resulting oxygen depletion and The Tankerhoosen River is a elimination of fish and wildlife tributary of the Hockanum River, habitat in surface waters. with headwaters in Tolland. Impairment of recreational From Walker Reservoir East activities, i.e., swimming, near I-84 Exit 67 in Vernon, boating, and fishing, are the Tankerhoosen extends also of concern. The town’s approximately five miles to its coordinated effort, which confluence with the Hockanum includes both professional field River at the Manchester town investigations and volunteer line. It is fed by a number of surveys as described below, streams, including Railroad may be instructive to other Brook, which originates at Bolton communities striving to protect Notch Pond in Bolton and flows the health of their rivers Hockanum River and Tankerhoosen River Watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Fishery Resources of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn College of Agriculture, Health and Natural Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station Resources 5-1975 An Evaluation of the Fishery Resources of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/saes Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, "An Evaluation of the Fishery Resources of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut" (1975). Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station. 50. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/saes/50 Bulletin 435, May '975 3 7 An Evaluation of the Fishery Resources of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut Edited by Richard L. Hames Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection STORRS AGRICULTURA L EXPERIMENT STATION COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RE SOURCES THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT, ST ORRS. CONNECTICUT 06268 • EDITOR'S FOREWORD The Thames River system is located in a section of southern New England that has escaped the extreme alterations of the industrial revolution and later urbanization. It has, unfortunately, suffered the consequences of dam construction causing the disappearance of anadromous fish, and industrial and domestic pollution which degraded water quality in some areas to a marginal fisheries habitat. Enough unspoiled areas are left, unaltered by dams, pollution and the developer, to reward the knowledgeable observer with a glimpse of what it was and what it could be again. As part of the program for restoration of anadromous fish to the Thames River system, it was decided to make a general biological survey of the system to document present conditions .
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Regulations and Boat Launches
    to boating in Connecticut! TheWelcome map with local ordinances, state boat launches, pumpout facilities, and Boating Infrastructure Grant funded transient facilities is back again. New this year is an alphabetical list of state boat launches located on Connecticut lakes, ponds, and rivers listed by the waterbody name. If you’re exploring a familiar waterbody or starting a new adventure, be sure to have the proper safety equipment by checking the list on page 32 or requesting a Vessel Safety Check by boating staff (see page 14 for additional information). Reference Reference Reference Name Town Number Name Town Number Name Town Number Amos Lake Preston P12 Dog Pond Goshen G2 Lake Zoar Southbury S9 Anderson Pond North Stonington N23 Dooley Pond Middletown M11 Lantern Hill Ledyard L2 Avery Pond Preston P13 Eagleville Lake Coventry C23 Leonard Pond Kent K3 Babcock Pond Colchester C13 East River Guilford G26 Lieutenant River Old Lyme O3 Baldwin Bridge Old Saybrook O6 Four Mile River Old Lyme O1 Lighthouse Point New Haven N7 Ball Pond New Fairfield N4 Gardner Lake Salem S1 Little Pond Thompson T1 Bantam Lake Morris M19 Glasgo Pond Griswold G11 Long Pond North Stonington N27 Barn Island Stonington S17 Gorton Pond East Lyme E9 Mamanasco Lake Ridgefield R2 Bashan Lake East Haddam E1 Grand Street East Lyme E13 Mansfield Hollow Lake Mansfield M3 Batterson Park Pond New Britain N2 Great Island Old Lyme O2 Mashapaug Lake Union U3 Bayberry Lane Groton G14 Green Falls Reservoir Voluntown V5 Messerschmidt Pond Westbrook W10 Beach Pond Voluntown V3 Guilford
    [Show full text]
  • Large Woody Debris Fact Sheet
    Inland Fisheries Division Habitat Conservation and Enhancement Program Large Woody Debris Fact Sheet I. Introduction Trees that grow along a streamside can often fall into a watercourse due to floods, erosion, windthrow, disease, beaver activity or natural mortality. These materials, often referred to as Large Woody Debris (LWD) can include whole trees with a rootwad and limbs attached or portions of trees with or without rootwads or limbs. LWD is typically defined by biologists as logs with a minimum diameter of 4 inches and a minimum length of 6 feet that protrude or lay within a stream channel. Environmental and recreational groups have often removed LWD as part of river cleanup or river improvement projects. Although these groups have good intentions, LWD removal can be “very detrimental” to stream health and well being. In fact, during the last decade, the Inland Fisheries Division has been actively adding LWD to river systems as a component of individual stream restoration projects, particularly in streams that are LWD deficient. This fact sheet describes the vital importance of LWD to river ecosystems and provides guidance for its beneficial management. Example of various types of large woody debris in the Moosup River, Plainfield. DEP • Inland Fisheries Division • Habitat Conservation and Enhancement Program 1 II. Ecological Benefits of Large Woody Debris Research studies have shown that LWD is a vital and naturally occurring component of healthy stream ecosystems. Ecological benefits of LWD are described below. ¾ Fish Habitat LWD that falls completely across a stream causes water to be slightly impounded resulting in the formation of an upstream pool and a downstream plunge pool as water flows under and over the wood.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources
    2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources In The Spotlight Updated Launch & Pumpout Directories CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION HTTPS://PORTAL.CT.GOV/DEEP/BOATING/BOATING-AND-PADDLING YOUR FULL SERVICE YACHTING DESTINATION No Bridges, Direct Access New State of the Art Concrete Floating Fuel Dock Offering Diesel/Gas to Long Island Sound Docks for Vessels up to 250’ www.bridgeportharbormarina.com | 203-330-8787 BRIDGEPORT BOATWORKS 200 Ton Full Service Boatyard: Travel Lift Repair, Refit, Refurbish www.bridgeportboatworks.com | 860-536-9651 BOCA OYSTER BAR Stunning Water Views Professional Lunch & New England Fare 2 Courses - $14 www.bocaoysterbar.com | 203-612-4848 NOW OPEN 10 E Main Street - 1st Floor • Bridgeport CT 06608 [email protected] • 203-330-8787 • VHF CH 09 2 2021 Connecticut BOATERS GUIDE We Take Nervous Out of Breakdowns $159* for Unlimited Towing...JOIN TODAY! With an Unlimited Towing Membership, breakdowns, running out GET THE APP IT’S THE of fuel and soft ungroundings don’t have to be so stressful. For a FASTEST WAY TO GET A TOW year of worry-free boating, make TowBoatU.S. your backup plan. BoatUS.com/Towing or800-395-2628 *One year Saltwater Membership pricing. Details of services provided can be found online at BoatUS.com/Agree. TowBoatU.S. is not a rescue service. In an emergency situation, you must contact the Coast Guard or a government agency immediately. 2021 Connecticut BOATER’S GUIDE 2021 Connecticut A digest of boating laws and regulations Boater's Guide Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Rules and Resources State of Connecticut Boating Division Ned Lamont, Governor Peter B.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Natchaug River Healthy Watershed Implementation Plan
    Upper Natchaug River Healthy Watershed Implementation Plan Jean Pillo, Watershed Conservation Project Manager Eastern Connecticut Conservation District Project 15-03 is funded in part by a US EPA Clean Water Act § 319 NPS grant through the CT DEEP What do we mean by upper Natchaug? • The Natchaug Watershed is ~175 square miles. • ECCD documented pollution sources completed a watershed based plan for the lower 10 square miles Natchaug watershed in 2014. • Previously, EPA Clean Water Act funds were only available to clean up pollution from non- point sources. • Upper Natchaug Healthy Watershed Implementation Plan may allow federal funds to be used for pollution prevention in the future. Natchaug CAP Re-CAP Holly Drinkuth The Nature Conservancy Why the Upper Natchaug was selected for the first Healthy Watershed Plan in CT Eric Thomas, Watershed Manager CT Department of Energy and Environmental Protection What are we trying to accomplish • In partnership with CT DEEP, ECCD will identify (map) where the streams, lakes and ponds are not polluted and share this information with the municipalities. • ECCD will identify and recommend cost-effective methods to protect those high quality waters and watershed services they provide to the local communities. • With guidance from the Stakeholders, ECCD will develop and conduct a community outreach campaign to build an increased awareness regarding the natural ecosystem services and long-term benefits of healthy watersheds for resilient communities. • The final Natchaug River Healthy Watershed Implementation Plan will enhance the capacity (Towns, heath districts, COGs and others) to support the healthy watershed planning process (including reduced drinking water treatment and infrastructure costs).
    [Show full text]
  • YOUR SOURCE for CT Fishing Information
    Share the Experience—Take Someone Fishing • APRIL 14 Opening Day Trout Fishing 2018 CONNECTICUT ANGLER’S GUIDE INLAND & MARINE FISHING YOUR SOURCE For CT Fishing Information »New Trout & »New Inland »New Marine Salmon Stamp Regulations Regulations See page 8 & 20 for 2018 for 2018 See page 20 See page 58 Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection www.ct.gov/deep/fishing FISHING REGULATIONS GUIDE - GA TRIM: . 8˝ X 10-1/2˝ (AND VARIOUS OTHER STATES) BLEED: . 8-1/4˝ X 10-3/4˝ SAFETY: . 7˝ X 10˝ TRIM TRIM SAFETY TRIM BLEED BLEED SAFETY BLEED BLEED TRIM TRIM SAFETY SAFETY SAFETY SAFETY TRIM TRIM BLEED BLEED TRIM TRIM TRIM BLEED BLEED SAFETY SAFETY Client: Progressive Job No: 16D00890 Created by: Dalon Wolford Applications: InDesign CC, Adobe Photoshop CC, Adobe Illustrator CC Job Description: Full Page, 4 Color Ad Document Name: Bass ad / Fishing Regulations Guide - GA and various other states Final Trim Size: 7-7/8˝ X 10-1/2˝ Final Bleed: 8-1/8˝ X 10-13/16˝ Safety: 7˝ X 10˝ Date Created: 11/7/16 FISHING REGULATIONS GUIDE - GA TRIM: . 8˝ X 10-1/2˝ (AND VARIOUS OTHER STATES) BLEED: . 8-1/4˝ X 10-3/4˝ SAFETY: . 7˝ X 10˝ TRIM TRIM SAFETY TRIM BLEED BLEED SAFETY BLEED BLEED TRIM TRIM SAFETY SAFETY 2018 CONNECTICUT ANGLER’S GUIDE INLAND REGULATIONS INLAND & MARINE FISHING Easy two-step process: 1. Check the REGULATION TABLE (page 21) for general statewide Contents regulations. General Fishing Information 2. Look up the waterbody in the LAKE AND PONDS Directory of Services Phone Numbers .............................2 (pages 32–41) or RIVERS AND STREAMS (pages 44–52) Licenses .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Watersheds
    Percent Impervious Surface Summaries for Watersheds CONNECTICUT WATERSHEDS Name Number Acres 1985 %IS 1990 %IS 1995 %IS 2002 %IS ABBEY BROOK 4204 4,927.62 2.32 2.64 2.76 3.02 ALLYN BROOK 4605 3,506.46 2.99 3.30 3.50 3.96 ANDRUS BROOK 6003 1,373.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.09 ANGUILLA BROOK 2101 7,891.33 3.13 3.50 3.78 4.29 ASH CREEK 7106 9,813.00 34.15 35.49 36.34 37.47 ASHAWAY RIVER 1003 3,283.88 3.89 4.17 4.41 4.96 ASPETUCK RIVER 7202 14,754.18 2.97 3.17 3.31 3.61 BALL POND BROOK 6402 4,850.50 3.98 4.67 4.87 5.10 BANTAM RIVER 6705 25,732.28 2.22 2.40 2.46 2.55 BARTLETT BROOK 3902 5,956.12 1.31 1.41 1.45 1.49 BASS BROOK 4401 6,659.35 19.10 20.97 21.72 22.77 BEACON HILL BROOK 6918 6,537.60 4.24 5.18 5.46 6.14 BEAVER BROOK 3802 5,008.24 1.13 1.22 1.24 1.27 BEAVER BROOK 3804 7,252.67 2.18 2.38 2.52 2.67 BEAVER BROOK 4803 5,343.77 0.88 0.93 0.94 0.95 BEAVER POND BROOK 6913 3,572.59 16.11 19.23 20.76 21.79 BELCHER BROOK 4601 5,305.22 6.74 8.05 8.39 9.36 BIGELOW BROOK 3203 18,734.99 1.40 1.46 1.51 1.54 BILLINGS BROOK 3605 3,790.12 1.33 1.48 1.51 1.56 BLACK HALL RIVER 4021 3,532.28 3.47 3.82 4.04 4.26 BLACKBERRY RIVER 6100 17,341.03 2.51 2.73 2.83 3.00 BLACKLEDGE RIVER 4707 16,680.11 2.82 3.02 3.16 3.34 BLACKWELL BROOK 3711 18,011.26 1.53 1.65 1.70 1.77 BLADENS RIVER 6919 6,874.43 4.70 5.57 5.79 6.32 BOG HOLLOW BROOK 6014 4,189.36 0.46 0.49 0.50 0.51 BOGGS POND BROOK 6602 4,184.91 7.22 7.78 8.41 8.89 BOOTH HILL BROOK 7104 3,257.81 8.54 9.36 10.02 10.55 BRANCH BROOK 6910 14,494.87 2.05 2.34 2.39 2.48 BRANFORD RIVER 5111 15,586.31 8.03 8.94 9.33 9.74
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Watershed Report the Hockanum River
    THE HOCKANUM RIVER STATE OF THE WATERSHED REPORT December 2005 Prepared for: North Central Conservation District, Inc. Prepared by: Funded in part by the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection through a United States Environmental Protection Agency Clean Water Act Section 604(b) Water Quality Management Planning Grant. THE HOCKANUM RIVER STATE OF THE WATERSHED REPORT North Central Conservation District, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE................................................................................... 5 2.1 Geology............................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Population and Industry................................................................................... 5 2.3 Restoration Efforts........................................................................................... 7 3.0 WATER RESOURCES ............................................................................................... 9 3.1 Water Quantity................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Water Quality................................................................................................. 12 3.2.1 Classifications and Impairments........................................................ 12 3.2.2 Monitoring Data ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hockanum River Water Pollution Control Facility Upgrade
    Project Overview Hockanum River Originally constructed in the mid 1950s as a primary treatment facility, the Hockanum River WPCF was ex- Water Pollution Control panded in 1970 to provide for secondary treatment. The WPCF was further expanded in 1990 to reduce the Facility Upgrade seasonal discharge of ammonia to the Hockanum River. A smaller upgrade was completed in 2004 to replace the chlorine gas disinfection system with a much safer ultra violet disinfection process. The Hockanum River Manchester Water & Sewer Department WPCF currently treats on average 6.5 million gallons per day (mgd) of sewage, with a peak flow in excess of 125 Spring Street 15 mgd. Manchester, CT 06045-0191 Planning for Future Needs www.townofmanchester.org The Hockanum River WPCF is facing several issues that need to be addressed to meet the needs of the com- munity including: Contractor – Nitrogen Removal The Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) established strict annual nitro- gen removal limits for all wastewater facilities in the state in order to improve the quality of Long Island Sound. To achieve these limits, the Hocka- 454 Boston Post Road num River WPCF must upgrade its treatment ca- Waterford, CT 06385 pabilities. www.carlincontracting.com – Phosphorus Removal The DEEP has also been working with the Environ- mental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish local water quality limits for phosphorus discharges from WPCFs to fresh water receiving streams such as the Hockanum. The DEEP informed Manchester that as part of the next renewal of the Town’s wastewater Project Engineer discharge permit, strict phosphorus limits would be included.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Statewide Riffle Bioassessment by Volunteers Report
    CT DEEP Riffle Bioassessment by Volunteers Program 2015 RBV Program Annual Summary Report (Report #17) www.ct.gov/deep/rbv Table of Contents Acknowledgements................................................................................................................ 1 RBV: The ‘Treasure Hunt’ for CT’s Healthiest Streams! ............................................................ 2 2015 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 3 2015 Participation Summary .................................................................................................. 4 Table 1. Annual RBV Program Participation Statistics 2010-2015 .................................................. 4 Figure 1. RBV Participation Map ..................................................................................................... 5 2015 Monitoring Results ........................................................................................................ 6 Table 2. Annual RBV Program Monitoring Location Statistics 2010-2015 ...................................... 6 Table 3. Summary of 2015 RBV Voucher Contents by RBV Category .............................................. 6 Figure 2. 2015 RBV Results Map ...................................................................................................... 7 Table 4. Frequency of RBV Types in 2015 Vouchers ........................................................................ 8 Table 5. Detailed 2015 RBV Station Results ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]