DOCSLIB.ORG

Surface Waters of the Atlantic and Was Ascribed to Continuous Inputs of HCH from Africa and South America (Loganathan & Kannan, 1994)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Surface Waters of the Atlantic and Was Ascribed to Continuous Inputs of HCH from Africa and South America (Loganathan & Kannan, 1994) See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252353401 POPs IN LATIN AMERICA Article CITATIONS READS 0 22 2 authors, including: Michelle anne Allsopp University of Exeter 22 PUBLICATIONS 240 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Michelle anne Allsopp on 19 August 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. 1 POPs IN LATIN AMERICA A review of persistent organic pollutant levels in Latin America Authors: Michelle Allsopp* and Bea Erry *Greenpeace Research Laboratories, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Prince of Wales Road Exeter EX4 4PS UK www.greenpeace.org October 2000 Special thanks are due to Marcelo Furtado and Wytze van der Naald of Greenpeace International, David Santillo of Greenpeace Research Laboratories, UK, and Karen Suassuna and Cristina Bonfiglioli of Greenpeace Brazil for reviewing the draft text of the report. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................14 1.1 The Chemicals of Concern..................................................................................15 2 GLOBAL POLLUTION AND TRANSPORT OF POPS .................................18 2.1 Fate of POPs in Tropical Ecosystems.................................................................19 2.2 Time Trends of POPs Levels in the Global Environment ..................................19 3 POPS IN LATIN AMERICA...............................................................................22 4 COASTAL ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................24 4.1 Coastal lagoons, water and sediments ................................................................25 4.1.1 Mexico: .......................................................................................................25 4.1.1.1 DDT ........................................................................................................26 4.1.1.2 Other Organochlorine Pesticides ............................................................27 4.1.1.3 PCBs .......................................................................................................33 4.1.2 Gulf of Mexico............................................................................................33 4.1.2.1 DDT ........................................................................................................34 4.1.2.2 Other Organochlorine Pesticides ............................................................34 4.1.2.3 PCBs .......................................................................................................34 4.1.3 Nicaragua ....................................................................................................34 4.1.3.1 DDT ........................................................................................................34 4.1.3.2 Other Organochlorine Pesticides ............................................................35 4.1.4 El Salvador..................................................................................................35 4.1.4.1 DDTs.......................................................................................................35 4.1.4.2 PCBs .......................................................................................................35 4.1.5 Brazil...........................................................................................................35 4.1.5.1 DDT ........................................................................................................36 4.1.5.2 Organochlorine Pesticides ......................................................................36 4.2 Coastal Biota.......................................................................................................36 4.2.1 Mexico ........................................................................................................37 4.2.1.1 DDTs...................................................37Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.2.1.2 Other Organochlorine Pesticides ............................................................37 4.2.1.3 PCBs .......................................................................................................44 4.2.2 Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea.......................................................44 4.2.2.1 DDT ........................................................................................................45 4.2.2.2 Organochlorine Pesticides ......................................................................45 4.2.2.3 PCBs .......................................................................................................46 4.2.2.4 Organotin Compounds............................................................................46 4.2.3 Honduras .....................................................................................................46 4.2.3.1 DDT ........................................................................................................47 4.2.3.2 Organochlorine Pesticides ......................................................................47 4.2.4 Nicaragua: ...................................................................................................47 4.2.4.1 DDT ........................................................................................................47 4.2.5 Venezuela....................................................................................................47 4.2.5.1 DDT ........................................................................................................47 3 4.2.5.2 Other Organochlorine Pesticides ............................................................48 4.2.5.3 PCBs .......................................................................................................48 4.2.6 El Salvador..................................................................................................48 4.2.6.1 DDT ........................................................................................................48 4.2.6.2 Organochlorine Pesticides ......................................................................48 4.2.6.3 PCBs .......................................................................................................48 4.2.7 Brazil...........................................................................................................48 4.2.7.1 DDT ........................................................................................................48 4.2.7.2 Other Organochlorine pesticides.............................................................49 4.2.8 Argentina.....................................................................................................49 4.2.8.1 DDT ........................................................................................................49 4.2.8.2 Other Organochlorine Pesticides ............................................................49 4.2.8.3 PCBs .......................................................................................................50 4.2.9 Remainder of Latin America.......................................................................50 4.2.9.1 DDT ........................................................................................................50 4.2.9.2 Organotin compounds.............................................................................50 4.2.9.3 PCBs .......................................................................................................50 5 MARINE ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................51 5.1 Air .......................................................................................................................51 5.1.1 DDT ............................................................................................................51 5.1.2 Other Organochlorine Pesticides ................................................................51 5.2 Seawater..............................................................................................................51 5.2.1 DDT ............................................................................................................52 5.2.2 Other Organochlorine Pesticides ................................................................52 5.2.3 PCBs ...........................................................................................................53 5.3 Marine Biota .......................................................................................................53 5.3.1 Fish and shellfish ........................................................................................53 5.3.1.1 DDT ........................................................................................................53 5.3.1.2 PCBs .......................................................................................................53 5.3.1.3 Organotin compounds.............................................................................53 5.3.2 Marine Mammals ........................................................................................54 5.3.2.1 DDT ........................................................................................................54 5.3.2.2 Organochlorine Pesticides ......................................................................56 5.3.2.3 PCBs, Dioxins and Brominated Flame Retardants .................................56
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (Pah) in Soil Of
    Rev. Int. Contam. Ambie. 36 (3) 677-687, 2020 https://doi.org/10.20937/RICA.53573 ANALYSIS OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAH) IN SOIL OF MANGROVE FOREST OF THE VENEZUELAN CARIBBEAN COAST Análisis de hidrocarburos aromáticos policíclicos (HAP) en suelos de bosques de manglares de las costas del Caribe venezolano Liliana LÓPEZ1*, María Beatriz BARRETO2, Maria do Carmo RUARO PERALBA3, Eduardo BARRETO-PITTOL1,2, Salvador LO MÓNACO1 and Rut DÍAZ1,4 1 Laboratorio de Geoquímica Orgánica, Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra (ICT), Facultad de Ciencias, Univer- sidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela. Caracas 1053 2 Laboratorio de Ecología de la Vegetación. Instituto de Zoología y Ecología Tropical (IZET) Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela. Caracas 1053 3 Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. 474 CEP 96201-900 4 Departamento de Geoquímica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil (present address) 16 Niterói, Río de Janeiro 1151 * Author for correspondence: [email protected] (Received: March 2019; accepted: October 2019) Key words: Morrocoy National Park, Cuare Inlet, mangroves, soluble organic matter, GC-MS, PAHs diagnostic ratios ABSTRACT In order to identify the levels of contamination of mangrove soils by polycyclic aro- matic hydrocarbons (PAH), their concentration was determined by gas chromatogra- phy coupled to mass spectrometry in the fraction of aromatic hydrocarbons obtained from soluble organic matter (SOM). Soils are located in Cuare Inlet and Morrocoy National Park from Venezuela, and samples were collected in Punta La Matica (PLM) and Tucacas Bay (ETU) respectively. Naphthalene, acenaphthene, acenaphthalene, benzo(ghi)perylene, dibenzo(ah)anthracene and indene have concentrations lower than the detection threshold for the technique employed (≤ 20 ng/g).
    [Show full text]
  • Pollution Biomarkers in the Framework of Marine Biodiversity Conservation: State of Art and Perspectives
    water Review Pollution Biomarkers in the Framework of Marine Biodiversity Conservation: State of Art and Perspectives Maria Giulia Lionetto * , Roberto Caricato and Maria Elena Giordano Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences and Technologies (DISTEBA), University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy; [email protected] (R.C.); [email protected] (M.E.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Marine biodiversity is threatened by several anthropogenic pressures. Pollution deriving from the discharge of chemical contaminants in the sea represents one of the main threats to the marine environment, influencing the health of organisms, their ability to recover their homeostatic status, and in turn endangering biodiversity. Molecular and cellular responses to chemical pollutants, known as biomarkers, are effect-based methodologies useful for detecting exposure and for assessing the effects of pollutants on biota in environmental monitoring. The present review analyzes and discusses the recent literature on the use of biomarkers in the framework of biodiversity conservation. The study shows that pollution biomarkers can be useful tools for monitoring and assessment of pollution threat to marine biodiversity, both in the environmental quality monitoring of protected areas and the assessment of the health status of species at risk. Moreover, key areas of the research that need further development are suggested, such as the development of omics-based biomarkers specifically addressed to conservation purposes and their validation in the field, the extension of the biomarker study to a wider number of endangered species, and the development of organic Citation: Lionetto, M.G.; Caricato, R.; guidelines for the application of the biomarker approach in support to conservation policies and Giordano, M.E.
    [Show full text]
  • ON 23(3) 461-466.Pdf
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 23: 461–466, 2012 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society FIRST DESCRIPTION OF THE NEST AND EGGS OF THE PLAIN-FLANKED RAIL (RALLUS WETMOREI) Adriana Rodríguez-Ferraro1,2, Eugenia Sánchez2, & Miguel Lentino3 1Departamento de Estudios Ambientales, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Apdo. 89.000, Caracas 1080-A, Venezuela. E-mail: [email protected] 2Laboratorio de Ecología Molecular de Vertebrados, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Apdo. 89.000, Caracas 1080-A, Venezuela. 3Fundación William H. Phelps, Apdo. 2009, Caracas 1010-A, Venezuela. Primera descripción del nido y los huevos de la Polla de Wetmore (Rallus wetmorei). Key words: Plain-flanked Rail, Rallus wetmorei, eggs, mangrove, nest, Venezuela. INTRODUCTION conservation priorities in Venezuela (Rodrí- guez et al. 2004). Main threats for this rail The Plain-flanked Rail (Rallus wetmorei) is a are the loss and deterioration of mangrove Venezuelan endemic species deserving urgent habitat as a consequence of expanding attention from a conservation perspective. touristic developments and activities derived This bird was first described in the mid-1940s from petrochemical industries (Rodríguez & (Zimmer & Phelps 1944), and after a few Rojas-Suárez 2008). These problems even other observations during the following 10 exist within the boundaries of the few pro- years, it went unrecorded for almost three tected areas (three national parks and one decades, until rediscovered in 1999 (Hilty wildlife refuge) where the species is known to 2003). It is restricted to a small area along the occur. central coast of Venezuela where it is known Recovery efforts of endangered birds from eight localities (Taylor 1996), but in have been hampered by the lack of basic recent years, it has been found in only five of knowledge on their biology, thus, research these sites (Rodríguez-Ferraro & Lentino in focused on determining biological character- prep.).
    [Show full text]
  • Some New Information on the Distribution of Venezuelan Birds
    Some new information on the distribution of Venezuelan birds Peter Boesman Como resultado de la observación de aves en el campo durante los ultimos 10 años, se presenta un resumen de nuevos datos de distribución de aves en Venezuela. Los datos están organizados por area (20 en total), la mayoria de las areas son poco conocidas. Las observaciones de mayor importancia se detallan en ‘appendix 1’. En Falcón, la Serranía de San Luis tiene muchas más especies tipicas de las alturas sub-tropicales de la Cordillera de la Costa que previamente conocido, las serranias en el noreste de Falcón, de alturas bajas, tienen una avifauna abundante de especies de selva tropical, y areas de agua dulce en esta misma parte de Falcón y el norte de Carabobo son un refugio para muchas especies acuaticas poco conocidas. Los Andes en Lara y Trujillo no han sido estudiados tan profundamente como en Mérida, y por consecuencia se han descubierto importantes extensiones en la distribución de varias especies. En Mérida, se documenta indicaciones de una ruta migratoria muy importante a través del Valle del Río Santo Domingo. Las alturas bajas del Parque Nacional Tamá en Táchira (en el valle de los ríos Frio y Negro) y las areas adjacentes en Apure merecen mayor investigación en vista de algunas observaciones sorprendentes. Igualmente, los descubrimientos en islas del Río Orinoco fueron inesperados. La selva del Río Caura en el norte de Bolívar alberga especies previamente conocidas solamente del estado de Amazonas, y la región del Río Grande en el noreste de Bolívar tiene una avifauna tipicamente Guyanesa.
    [Show full text]
  • VENEZUELA La Escalera and the Western Areas May 29 – June 11, 2005 by RON HOFF Clinton, Tennessee USA
    VENEZUELA La Escalera and the western areas May 29 – June 11, 2005 By RON HOFF Clinton, Tennessee USA My wife, Dollyann Myers, and I joined our friends Frank Bills and his wife Sharon Bostick for a 2 week trip to Venezuela. Frank had contracted with Venezuelan guide David Ascanio ([email protected]) to guide us for this trip. David is a well known native Venezuela guide and guides regularly for Victor Emanuel Nature Tours and other tour companies, as well as private groups. We all found David to be one of the best guides we have ever used, anywhere. His knowledge of Venezuelan birds, their calls, and their habitats is unbelievable. On top of that he is a great guy with a superb sense of humor. We had a fantastic time with him and highly recommend him to anyone going to Venezuela or nearby countries. He has his own web site at www.ascaniobirding.com. Our trip was oriented around trying to find as many endemics as we could, but not necessarily as many species as we could. This worked out fine for us and in the end I saw 413 species and heard another 36. This included 20 endemics. Clements’ list says there are 45 endemics in Venezuela, so this adds up to about 44% of Venezuela’s endemics. Adding in what others saw and heard but I didn’t, we finished up with nearly 500 species anyway. Pretty awesome for just 2 weeks! I’ll write up the daily accounts, highlighting most of the new species for the day (but not necessarily the common birds like Tropical Kingbird, etc.), and then I’ll give the overall species list at the end of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • M a R I N E PROTECTED AREAS WW F ’S Role in Their Fut U R E De V E L O P M E N T
    M a r i n e PROTECTED AREAS WW F ’s Role in their Fut u r e De v e l o p m e n t WWF INTERNATI O N A L Discussion Document WWF INTERNATIONAL Marine Programme Avenue du Mont-Blanc CH-1196 Gland Switzerland Tel: +41 22 364 91 11 Fax: +41 22 364 05 26 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.panda.org Editor: Sue Wells © text 1998 WWF Published in December 1998 by WWF–World Wide Fund For Nature (formerly World Wildlife Fund), Gland, Switzerland. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. Printed in the UK on recycled paper (including 75 per cent post-consumer waste) using vegetable-oil based inks. When disposing of this publication, please try to ensure that it is recycled. A BANSON Production 3 Turville Street, London E2 7HR, UK. Contents Marine Protected Areas: W W F ’s Role in their Executive summary 5 Future Development 1. Introduction 11 2. Protecting marine environments 12 2.1 Ecological differences between marine and terrestrial environments 12 2.2 Managing marine ecosystems 13 3. Definitions and categories of MPAs 14 3.1 Defining MPAs 14 3.2 IUCN protected area categories 15 3.3 Specific types of MPAs 16 4. WWF’s involvement in MPAs 22 4.1 Africa and Madagascar 22 4.2 Asia and Pacific 22 4.3 Europe and Middle East 24 4.4 Latin America and Caribbean 26 4.5 North America 27 4.6 Southern Ocean 27 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Values of Coral Reefs, Mangroves, and Seagrasses a Global Compilation 2008
    Economic Values of Coral Reefs, Mangroves, and Seagrasses A Global Compilation 2008 WORLD RESOUR CES I NSTITUTE Conservation International (CI) Conservation International’s mission is to preserve the Earth’s living heritage, our global biodiversity, and to demonstrate that human societies can live harmoniously with nature. Foreword Coastal Ocean Values Center (COVC) The mission of The Ocean Foundation’s Coastal Ocean Values Center is to create a ropical marine and coral reef ecosystems, including mangroves national program of coordinated research and data collection on economic indicators and seagrasses, are vulnerable environmental resources that provide sig- of coastal ecosystem health, to educate the public and coastal managers about the T economic importance of coastal activities, and to provide economic data and analysis to nificant economic goods and services and contribute to the livelihoods, food improve coastal and ocean management. security and safety of millions of people around the world. The health of these resources is critical to human well-being. By accounting for coastal marine World Resources Institute (WRI) and coral reef ecosystem values in management decisions, we can sustain their The World Resources Institute’s mission is to move human society to live in ways that flow of goods and services in the interest of current and future generations. protect Earth’s environment and its capacity to provide for the needs and aspirations of current and future generations. Recognizing the importance of economic valuations, in
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Lionfish Abundance, Size Structure and Spatial Distribution Along the Venezuelan Coast ( Pterois Volitans , Pteroinae: S
    Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN: 0034-7744 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica Agudo, Esteban A.; Klein Salas, Eduardo Lionfish abundance, size structure and spatial distribution along the Venezuelan coast ( Pterois volitans , Pteroinae: Scorpaenidae) Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 62, núm. 3, septiembre, 2014, pp. 151-158 Universidad de Costa Rica San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44932432014 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Lionfish abundance, size structure and spatial distribution along the Venezuelan coast (Pterois volitans, Pteroinae: Scorpaenidae) Esteban A. Agudo1 & Eduardo Klein Salas2 1. Laboratorio de Ecología Experimental, Universidad Simón Bolívar, 1086, Caracas, Venezuela; [email protected] 2. Laboratorio de Sensores Remotos, Universidad Simón Bolívar, 1086, Caracas, Venezuela. Received 01-IX-2013. Corrected 23-II-2014. Accepted 24-III-2014. Abstract: The recent invasion of lionfish (Pterois volitans) in the Atlantic is considered a new threat to benthic and fish communities in the Caribbean region. This species was first reported in Venezuela in 2009 at various sites. Increasing reports in the past five years suggest lionfish has expanded its range of distribution and habitats. Nevertheless, this information is mostly anecdotal and extensive surveys aimed to determine its abundance, size structure and other ecological aspects encompassing wider spatial scales are necessary to understand the actual role of this species on sub-tidal marine communities in Venezuela.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Organic Carbon of Mangrove Forests
    Organic Geochemistry 100 (2016) 51–61 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Organic Geochemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/orggeochem Soil organic carbon of mangrove forests (Rhizophora and Avicennia) of the Venezuelan Caribbean coast ⇑ María Beatriz Barreto a, , Salvador Lo Mónaco b, Rut Díaz b, Eduardo Barreto-Pittol a, Liliana López b, Maria do Carmo Ruaro Peralba c a Laboratorio de Ecología de la Vegetación, Instituto de Zoología y Ecología Tropical (IZET), Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela b Laboratorio de Geoquímica Orgánica, Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra (ICT), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela c Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil article info abstract Article history: In order to understand the processes that control organic matter preservation in tropical wetlands, we Received 22 April 2016 have evaluated the mineralogy, total organic carbon (TOC wt%), soluble organic matter (SOM wt%), bulk Received in revised form 26 July 2016 density (g/cm3), and carbon stock (Mg/ha), and used FTIR to identify functional groups in SOM of soil in Accepted 4 August 2016 mangrove forest dominated by Rhizophora or Avicennia with different conditions (live, deteriorated and Available online 10 August 2016 dead). Six locations along the Cuare Inlet and Morrocoy National Park were studied. Mineralogical anal- ysis showed the presence of minerals, such as pyrite and rhodochrosite, from anoxic environments. Keywords: Rhizophora mangrove soils have higher TOC compared with Avicennia, but we did not find significant Venezuelan mangrove soils differences in SOM. TOC/SOM ratios were lower for Avicennia soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Page Numbers in Italics Refer to Tables Plbrj\E 131-2, 136, 147 Plddo
    Index Page numbers in bold refer to figures; page numbers in italics refer to tables PlBRJ\E 131-2, 136, 147 see also Earth Summit; UNCED, Rio Plddo National Park 124 BIOMPl 138 Plfrican Development Bank 264 Biomanipulation 194,200 Plgenda 21, Rio 17,262 Bioresource use, sustainable 162-3,290 see also UNCED, Rio Biosphere Reserves 184, 187, 193,201 Plggressor 246-7 Biotechnology, molecular 164-5 Plgriculture 222, 256 Birds Directive, EU 25 deforestation and 216--17 Birdlife International 274 lack of biological basis for 153 Bittern 28 productivity of 232 'BobBase' 33 subsidized 109, 110 Botswana, protein sources in 16 sustainable 156, 157 Buenos Plires, IUCN Plssembly at 7 wetlands and 191,194 Buffering 157,194,197,268,289 see also Farming Brundtland Report 151 Plgrotechnology 291 Butterflies 251,252 Plid 221,222,261-75 greening trends 261-3 Cairo, World Conference on Population at Plid agencies 272-5 15 bilateral 266--72 CPlMLPlR 189 multilateral 263-6 CPlMPFIRE project, Zimbabwe 10,16 PlIDS 107,108,110 Canada Plmazonia 5,15-16,258-9 aid agencies in 270 Plmbolesi National Park, Kenya 16 Canaima National Park 142-3,147 j\NPlPRO 132 Caracas World Congress 1, 7,81,83 Plntarctica 5, 189 conclusions of 14-15,21 Plpollo astronauts 210 problems and challenges identified at Plquatic biodiversity 181-204 12-14 Plquatic ecosystems, sustainable use of Carnivores 120 199-202 Carrying capacity 152,153, 156 Pltlantic Tuna Convention 189 Chalklands 33 Pludubon Society, Venezuelan 148 Cheetah 120, 123 Plustralia Children 104,110,113 aid agencies in
    [Show full text]
  • Folliculinid Ciliates: a New Threat to Caribbean Corals?
    DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Vol. 69: 75–78, 2006 Published March 23 Dis Aquat Org Folliculinid ciliates: a new threat to Caribbean corals? Aldo Cróquer1,*, Carolina Bastidas1, Diana Lipscomb2 1Departamento de Biología de Organismos, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas 1080-A, Venezuela 2Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA ABSTRACT: This is the first report of a putative pathogenic ciliate protozoan that has been associated with Caribbean corals. Previously, only 2 species of the phylum Ciliophora had been linked to coral diseases, and they were exclusive to the Indo-Pacific region. In this study, a ciliate of the genus Halo- folliculina was found on 10 hard coral species at the National Parks of Los Roques and Morrocoy, Venezuela. The general morphology of this ciliate is very similar to that of Halofolliculina corallasia from the Indo-Pacific, which is known to cause skeletal eroding band. None of the other 31 genera in the family Folliculinidae are known to cause diseases in corals or in any other animal species. The presence of this ciliate, which shows a prevalence comparable to that of other epizootics in the Caribbean, suggests it could be a new threat to the coral reefs of this region. KEY WORDS: Coral · Ciliate · Disease · Caribbean · Coral reefs Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION Many parasitic and pathogenic species of protists are known for their ability to cause massive mortalities in Coral diseases have been reported world-wide, marine invertebrates (Harvell et al. 1999, Gómez-Gutier- across oceans and bioregion provinces (Harvell et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropogenic Influences on Heavy Metals Across Marine Habitats in The
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Continental Shelf Research 28 (2008) 2757–2766 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Continental Shelf Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/csr Anthropogenic influences on heavy metals across marine habitats in the western coast of Venezuela E.M. Garcı´a a,b,Ã, J.J. Cruz-Motta b,c, O. Farina a, C. Bastidas a,b a Departamento de Biologı´a de Organismos, Universidad Simo´n Bolı´var, Sartenejas, Caracas 1080, Venezuela b Instituto de Tecnologı´a y Ciencias Marinas, Universidad Simo´n Bolı´var, Sartenejas, Caracas 1080, Venezuela c Departamento de Estudios Ambientales, Universidad Simo´n Bolı´var, Sartenejas, Caracas 1080, Venezuela article info abstract Article history: Concentrations of ten metals were measured in waters and sediments at 14 sites during four sampling Received 10 June 2008 periods (1996–1997). These sites include various marine ecosystems that are highly influenced by Received in revised form industry, tourism and river discharges, nine of which are within the Morrocoy National Park. Spatially, 18 September 2008 metal concentrations in water were homogenous, whereas in sediments their distributions were related Accepted 24 September 2008 to grain size. Maximum concentrations of cadmium (Cd) and mean concentrations of copper (Cu), nickel Available online 17 October 2008 (Ni), lead (Pb) and zinc (Zn) in water were above the guideline values proposed by NOAA, indicating the Keywords: potential of these metals for producing chronic effects in marine biota. Sheltered sites showed the Heavy metals highest metal concentrations in sediments; with Cd and Zn above these guidelines. Enrichment factors Sediment quality and geo-accumulation indexes suggested that metals in sediments were largely of natural origin except Runoff for Pb, Cd and vanadium (V), which were apparently associated with industrial effluents.
    [Show full text]