National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 – 2036

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA)

January 2018

Appendix C – Summary of rejected housing sites

1 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Appendix C: Summary of rejected housing sites (either unsuitable, unavailable or unachievable) by Parish

Parish: Ashurst &

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reason for rejection

89 Ashurst St Joseph’s Rejected at Stage 2 – Unknown - the Unknown - the The site has not been promoted by the Retreat, although the site is site was not site was not put owner and it is unclear if it is available for Lyndhurst well located in relation put forward by forward by the development. The site has many mature Road, Ashurst to the village of the owner and owner and it is trees covered by TPOs which would need to Ashurst, it is very well it is unknown unknown be felled for residential development, treed and residential whether the whether impacting on the character of the area. development would site is development is impact on the available. achievable on character of the area. the site.

91 Ashurst Telephone Rejected at Stage 2 – Unknown - the Unknown - the This part brownfield site is in employment Exchange, although the site is site was not site was not put use. Given the proximity of the New Forest Lyndhurst well located for the put forward by forward by the SPA to the site it is not considered to be Road, Ashurst services in Ashurst, it the owner and owner and it is suitable for housing development. also lies within 400m it is unknown unknown of the New Forest whether the whether SPA and is therefore site is development is not considered available. achievable on suitable. the site.

139 Ashurst Land at Rejected at Stage 2 – Yes – the site Yes - no legal This is a large predominantly greenfield site Foxhills, this large scale has been put issues have that would constitute major development in Ashurst development would forward by the been identified the National Park. Development would fundamentally alter the landowner and and the effectively merged the village of Ashurst character of this part is therefore development of with the Totton urban area. The National of the National Park considered to the site is Park boundary was designated in 2005 and run contrary to the be available. considered following extensive examination and this local community’s aim achievable. proposal would fundamentally change the of keeping the New landscape character of the area.

2 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Forest village of Ashurst separate from the adjacent Totton urban area (excluded from the National Park in 2005).

140 Ashurst Land to the Rejected at Stage 2 – The land is in The land is in This is a large, greenfield site that would south of the this is a prominent single single constitute major development in the A35, Ashurst greenfield site where ownership and ownership and National Park. The review of the defined development of the the landowner no issues have village boundary of Ashurst identified the scale proposed would has confirmed been identified clear boundary formed by the A35 and fundamentally alter the that the site is regarding the development of the scale proposed would landscape character of available for achievability of have a significant impact on the landscape the site. development. development. character.

154 Ashurst Land to rear of Rejected at Stage 2 – Yes – the Yes - no legal This small site is located adjacent to the 213 & 219 site lies outside the agent acting on issues have New Forest’s Natura 2000 sites and is Lyndhurst defined village behalf of the been identified therefore not considered to be appropriate Road, Ashurst boundary of Ashurst landowner has and the as a Local Plan housing allocation. and is adjacent to the states that the development of New Forest SPA. site is available the site is and could be considered completed by achievable. 2020.

179 Ashurst Part of the Rejected at Stage 2- Not currently - Unclear - A Brownfield land at Ashurst Hospital may Ashurst this brownfield site is The landowner legal ‘reverser become available during the Local Plan Hospital Site well located for the has confirmed clause’ included period. The site has some merits in terms of services and transport that the site is when the land its proximity to the services and transport links in Ashurst. not currently was first links in Ashurst. However, the site has yet to However the site is available for transferred from be deemed surplus to the NHS’s healthcare also immediately development the Open Forest requirements and further issues centre on adjacent to the New and this is has been the immediate proximity of the New Forest’s Forest SPA. Access to dependent on explored and it Natura 2000 sites (which would restrict the

3 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

the site is currently a decision from has been form of any future residential development); over Forestry the NHS in concluded that and the existing access arrangements which Commission land and 2018 this is not a involve access over third party land. With this would need to be confirming that barrier to these issues outstanding, it is considered addressed should the part of the site development. premature to allocate the site for housing in site become available being declared However, the the Local Plan. during the Local Plan- surplus to the access to the period. operational site is currently healthcare owned by a requirements third party and of the NHS. is unclear if access rights could be negotiated for residential use.

Parish: Beaulieu

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reason for rejection

131 Beaulieu St Leonard’s Rejected at Stage 2 – Yes – the site Yes - no legal This is a relatively remote part of the National Farm the site comprises a has been put issues have Park and not an appropriate location for housing buildings, range of listed forward by the been identified site allocations. The complex of buildings are a Sowley Lane, buildings in an area landowner and and the designated heritage asset and any residential Beaulieu with limited access to is therefore development of development would need to be considered services. A more considered to the site is through the planning application process, having appropriate route to be available. considered regard to their built heritage status and the pursue residential use achievable. optimum viable use. may be through an agreed Estate Plan.

132 Beaulieu Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 – Yes – the site Yes - no legal This site is detached from the village of Beaulieu to ‘Harlicks’, the site is detached has been put issues have and would result in additional development in Hatchet Lane, from the village of forward by the been identified the countryside. It is therefore not considered to

4 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Beaulieu Beaulieu and has no landowner and and the be a suitable location for additional housing in safe pedestrian routes is therefore development of the absence of an Estate Plan setting out the to Beaulieu or East considered to the site is wider plan for the future of the Estate. . be available. considered achievable.

133 Beaulieu Land at Palace Rejected at Stage 2 – Yes – the site Yes - no legal This small site is fairly well located in terms of Lane, Beaulieu this very small site is has been put issues have the services or Beaulieu and public transport. best pursued through forward by the been identified There may be scope for a couple of Estate the Estate Plans route landowner and and the worker’s dwellings or as a rural exception site. or as a rural exception is therefore development of site. considered to the site is be available. considered achievable.

Parish: Boldre

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reason for rejection

5 Walhampton Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal The site is not located within or adjacent to any of Hill, – the site is not well has been put issues have the main villages within the National Park and 0.4ha site located in relation to forward by the been identified permission has in the past (prior to National Park adjacent to existing services and landowner and and the designation) been refused for residential existing settlements within is therefore development of development on the site. properties at the National Park considered to the site is Walhampton and is detached from be available. considered Hill. the town of achievable. Lymington.

66 Norleywood Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal The site is relatively detached from local services. to ‘Butlers’, – this greenfield site has been put issues have An application for two dwellings on the site was Norleywood is on the edge of the forward by the been identified refused in 1988 and dismissed at appeal due to Road scattered settlement landowner and and the the lack of justification for open market houses in of Norleywood with is therefore development of the protected landscape. The site also lies within

5 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

limited access to considered to the site is 400 metres of the New Forest SPA and is local services. The be available. considered therefore not considered to be suitable as a site also lies within achievable. housing site allocation in the Local Plan. 400m from the new Forest SPA and is therefore not considered to be suitable for housing development.

97 Boldre Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 1 N/A N/A Rejected due to concerns over flooding and the to 1 Frogmore – the site includes proximity of the New Forest SPA. Cottages, land within Flood Norleywood, Risk Zone 3 on the Boldre latest maps available from the Environment Agency. It is also located within 400 metres of the New Forest SPA and so is not suitable.

169 Boldre Site A, Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal The site is isolated from any nearby settlements. Coachman’s – the site is isolated has been put issues have The site is small (0.1ha) and the allocation of a Cottage, from larger forward by the been identified site for a single dwelling is not considered settlements within landowner and and the appropriate through the Local Plan Review. Road, Boldre the National Park is therefore development of and is therefore not considered to the site is considered to be a be available. considered suitable focus for achievable. new housing development.

6 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

170 Boldre Site B, Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal The site is isolated from any nearby settlements. Coachman’s – the site is isolated has been put issues have The site is small (0.07ha) and the allocation of a Cottage, from larger forward by the been identified site for a single dwelling is not considered Southampton settlements within landowner and and the appropriate through the Local Plan Review. Road, Boldre the National Park is therefore development of and is therefore not considered to the site is considered to be a be available. considered suitable focus for achievable. new housing development.

182 Walhampton Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal The Walhampton Hill area is not considered to be The Dell, – the site is not well has been put issues have a suitable location for further residential Brickfield Lane, located in relation to forward by the been identified allocations. The site is located within the Walhampton existing services and landowner and and the Conservation Area and is detached from the main settlements within is therefore development of settlement of Lymington by the busy Bridge Road. the National Park considered to the site is and is detached from be available. considered the town of achievable. Lymington.

Parish:

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

125 Bramshaw Home Farm, Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal The site represents a cluster of buildings that do not Kewlake Lane, – the site is in a has been put issues have relate particularly closely to existing settlements Bramshaw relatively forward by the been identified and services. The site is therefore not appropriate Currently in inaccessible location landowner and and the for allocation in the Local Plan. Depending on the mixed and does not relate is therefore development of heritage assets on the site, as case could be made agricultural, to any particular considered to the site is for an enabling development linked to the locally residential and settlement in the be available. considered listed buildings on the site. storage use. area. achievable.

7 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

155 Bramshaw The Rosary Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the agent Yes - no legal The site does not relate well to existing services Garage, – the site does not acting on issues have and settlements within the National Park. It is also Bramshaw relate well to behalf of the been identified located within 400 metres of the New Forest SPA existing settlements landowners and the and is therefore not considered to be appropriate as in the National Park states that the development of a Local Plan housing allocation. and lies within 400 site is available the site is metres of the New and could be considered Forest SPA. completed by achievable. 2020.

Parish:

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

19 Bransgore Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - The Yes - no legal The proposed large greenfield development (4.5ha) to Meyrick - development of this landowner issues have would extend the built form of Bransgore into the Close, large greenfield site states the site been identified surrounding open countryside of the nationally Bransgore would result in the is available for and the protected landscape of the National Park. 4.5ha neighbouring urban development development of greenfield site. area of Bransgore which could the site is (outside the Park) commence considered extending into within 5 years achievable. agricultural land subject to the within the National termination of Park. the agricultural tenancy agreement.

55 Thorney Hill Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal The site comprises a very well treed garden area to 1 Brick – the settlement of has been put issues have linked to existing properties in a settlement with Lane, Thorney Thorney Hill has very forward by the been identified very limited services. This, allied to the very small Hill, Bransgore limited services and landowner and and the size of the site and the proximity of the New Forest 0.12ha site is not considered to is therefore development of SPA, means it is not considered to be a suitable comprising be a suitable focus considered to the site is housing allocation site.

8 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

rear gardens. for new be available. considered development. The achievable. site also lies within 400m of the New Forest SPA.

56 Thorney Hill Land to the Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal The very small size of the site and the proximity of rear of 266 – – the settlement of has been put issues have the New Forest SPA means it is not considered to 272 Burley Thorney Hill has very forward by the been identified be a suitable housing allocation site. Road, Thorney limited services and landowner and and the Hill is not considered to is therefore development of 0.04ha site be a suitable focus considered to the site is currently used for new be available. considered for parking. development. The achievable. site also lies within 400m of the New Forest SPA.

57 Bransgore Land to the Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal The existing site is heavily planted with large trees east of East – the site is has been put issues have on the boundaries. The area is of a rural character Close Farm, detached from forward by the been identified (woodland and open farmland) with some sporadic Bransgore settlements and landowner and and the housing and not an appropriate location for further 0.14 ha site would result in new is therefore development of development. currently very dwellings in the considered to the site is overgrown. open countryside. be available. considered achievable.

101 Thorney Hill Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal The site lies within 400 metres of the New Forest to ‘Forest – the site lies within has been put issues have SPA and is therefore not a suitable housing site Acre’, Brick 400m of the new forward by the been identified allocation. In addition the settlement of Thorney Hill Lane, Thorney Forest SPA. In landowner and and the has very limited services and public transport links, Hill addition, Thorney is therefore development of with the nearest facilities 2 km away in Bransgore. Hill has very limited considered to the site is services and is be available. considered considered to be a achievable.

9 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

suitable focus for housing development.

126 Godwinscroft Land at The Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal The site is in a rural location and is surrounded by Glen, - the site is detached has been put issues have some residential development but also wide ranging Lyndhurst from settlements forward by the been identified views to the rear and front of the site across open Road, and would result in landowner and and the landscape. Godwinscroft new dwellings in the is therefore development of open countryside. considered to the site is be available. considered achievable.

Parish:

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

7 Brockenhurst Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 1 Yes – the Yes - the agent The majority of the site lies with Flood Risk Zone 3 to the Balmer due to concerns over original ‘Call representing the as identified by the Environment Agency’s mapping Lawn Hotel flood risk. In addition for Sites’ landowner and the New Forest SFRA. The site also lies within the site is located submission states that the 400m of the New Forest SPA so is not considered close to the New stated the site site could be suitable as a housing allocation. Forest SPA making it would be built in the next unsuitable for a available 5 years. housing site within 5 years. allocation through In 2017 an the Local Plan. application for housing on the site was submitted.

8 Brockenhurst Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the No – the site is The site is located within the defined village to Harting / – although the site landowner subject to a boundary of Brockenhurst. However, it is also south of Forest lies within the states that the S106 agreement subject to a S106 agreement requiring it to be

10 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

View, defined village site is which preclude retained as (private) open space. A previous Rhinefield boundary, the available for residential use. application for residential use; and to change the Road, existing S106 housing A previous use of the land, have both been refused, with the Brockenhurst agreement for the development. application to latter refused at appeal in November 2012. site – supported on change the use appeal – indicates of the land was that the site is not refused on available. The appeal. Inspector concluded that there is a continuing specific need for the S106 agreement to restrict the use of the land.

28 Brockenhurst New Forest Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal This site is located within 400m of the New Forest Activity Centre, – the site lies within has been put issues have SPA and is therefore not suitable as a housing site Rhinefield 400m of the New forward by the been identified allocation. Residential development would not Road, Forest SPA and is landowner and and the relate well to forming a logical extension to the Brockenhurst therefore not suitable is therefore development of defined village boundary. as a housing site considered to the site is allocation (or an be available. considered amendment to the achievable. Defined Village settlement boundary). . 69 Brockenhurst Hunters Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal Residential development on the site was refused in Lodge, Sway – the site is located has been put issues have the 1960s and 1970s due to concerns over impact Road, immediately adjacent forward by the been identified on the local character. Given the site’s proximity to Brockenhurst to the New Forest landowner and and the the New Forest SPA, it would not be appropriate to 0.12 ha SPA and is therefore is therefore development of amend the settlement boundary to incorporate it. paddock site. not considered to be considered to the site is a suitable site to be available. considered amend the defined achievable.

11 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

village boundary to incorporate.

83 Brockenhurst Lane adjacent The site was N/A N/A The site was included in the Authority’s draft Local to Vinney’s included in the Plan (October 2016) and planning permission was Close, Mill Authority’s draft granted in Feb. 2017 for the development of 10 Lane, Local Plan (October dwellings as a rural exception site (application ref. Brockenhurst 2016) and planning 16/00804). permission was granted in Feb. 2017 for the development of 10 dwellings as a rural exception site.

85 Brockenhurst R A Sibley, Rejected at Stage 2 Unknown - the Unknown - the This is a small brownfield site currently in Lyndhurst – the site is in site was not site was not put employment use. Given the very modest size of the Road, employment use and put forward by forward by the site (0.035ha) there will only be very limited scope Brockenhurst given the very small the owner and owner and it is for a modest mixed use re-development to include a scale of the site it is unknown unknown small element of housing. (0.035ha) the site is whether the whether better retained in site is development is employment use. available for achievable on development. the site.

144 Brockenhurst Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal The surrounding area is rural in character with Tile Barn - the surrounding has been put issues have mature landscaping. The site is relatively detached House, Tile area is rural in forward by the been identified from the defined village boundary of Brockenhurst Barn Lane, character with landowner and and the and is not considered to be an appropriate focus for Brockenhurst mature landscaping, is therefore development of new housing land allocations through the Local and some low considered to the site is Plan. density residential be available. considered development. The achievable. site is detached from the village of Brockenhurst and not considered suitable.

12 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

153 Brockenhurst Land to the Rejected at Stage 2 Unknown - the Unknown - the The whole of the site is designated as a SSSI or south of – the whole of the site was not site was not put SINC. It is therefore not considered to be Brockenhurst site is covered by put forward by forward by the appropriate for a housing site allocation. railway station habitat designations the owner and owner and it is and it is therefore not it is unknown unknown suitable for housing. whether the whether site is development is available for achievable on development. the site.

161 Wootton Wootton Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the Yes - no issues This site is not well related to any settlements and Barns, – the site is located landowner has have been is in an isolated location surrounded by a few Wilverley in a relatively stated the site identified properties and there are no public transport links. Road, New isolated location, is available regarding the The site also lies in close proximity to arrange of Milton away from now and achievability of protected habitats in the New Forest and is settlements and development developing the therefore not considered to be suitable as a housing services and close to could be site. allocation site. protected habitats. It completed by is not considered 2020. suitable.

164 Brockenhurst Brockenhurst Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - the land is The site has a rural character to it and is Manor Golf – although adjoining has been put in single characterised by a number of trees. The scale of Club, Sway the defined village forward by the ownership and development proposed would fundamentally alter Road, boundary, the landowner and the landowners the character of the site. There may be scope for a Brockenhurst character of the site is therefore have stated that smaller rural exception site scheme that is best (having turned off development in considered through the development control Sway Road) is rural this area would process. and the site is well support the treed. Development viability of the of the scale Golf Club. proposed (12 dwellings) would detrimentally affect the character of the site.

13 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Parish: Burley

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

2 Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The site lies close to the New Forest SPA and is Close to Uplands, – the site lies within landowner has issues have therefore not suitable as a housing allocation on Bisterne Close 400 metres of the put the site been identified the basis of Natural ’s advice. 2.5ha New Forest SPA. forward for and the Development would change the character of greenfield site, There are also housing and it development of Bisterne Close; and would result in development proposed concerns regarding is therefore the site is encroaching into the open countryside. residential use the consolidation of considered to considered scattered be available. achievable. development in the area.

41 Burley Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the site Unclear - The site has potential as a rural exception site. to Deer Hall, - the site has the is owned by access is However, there are question marks over the Campden Park, potential for a small Burley Parish currently achievability of the development due to the affordable housing Council who provided by an restrictive clause in the title deeds and the need to Road, Burley development. It is confirm it easement under relocate the existing nursery. Given the size of the relatively well located would be the freehold title site it would best be taken forward through the for the services in available within over the drive to Development Control process, rather than the Burley village centre. one year – this the adjacent Local Plan. There are however would require property. concerns regarding the nursery to Reference to its availability and relocate. restrictive uses achievability. set out in the title deeds.

54 Burley Garage court Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - The Yes - no legal The proximity of the site to the New Forest SPA between 8 & 10 – although the landowner issues have means it is not considered suitable for a Local Meadow Close, brownfield site is well states that the been identified Plan allocation. Given the size of the site, it is Burley located for the site is and the better suited to a small rural exception site services in Burley available. development of scheme which could be taken forward through the village centre, the site There may be the site is Development Control process, rather than the

14 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

lies within 400m of an issue considered Local Plan. the New Forest SPA. relating to loss achievable. of the parking area for the existing housing.

65 Burley Land at Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal This greenfield site is located in close proximity to Street Randalls Farm, – the site lies within landowner has issues have the New Forest SPA and is therefore not suitable Burley Street 400m of the New put the site been identified for development. The site is accessed via an un- 1.2ha Forest SPA. It is forward for and the made road across the SSSI and is not suitable for greenfield site. relatively detached housing and it development of an additional 30 dwellings from the services in is therefore the site is Burley village centre, considered to considered in a semi-rural area. be available. achievable. It is therefore not considered to be suitable for housing.

162 Burley Oak Bark Bend, Rejected at Stage 2- Yes - the Yes - the Buildings only cover small portion of the site, rest Chapel Lane, the site lies within landowner has landowner is grassland/grazing. The main in principle issue is Burley 400 metres of the confirmed that states that there the proximity of the New Forest’s Natura 2000 New Forest SPA and the site is are no issues sites to the site which means it is not considered is detached from the available. relating to to be suitable as a housing allocation site. main part of the viability and village of Burley. It is there are no therefore not legal issues considered suitable. affecting the achievability of residential development.

168 Burley Moormans & Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal This brownfield site is well located for the services Son Ltd, – the site lies within landowner has issues have in the village of Burley, but also lies close to the Ringwood 400 metres of the put the site been identified New Forest SPA. The site has potential as a rural

15 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Road, The New Forest SPA and forward for and the exception site and is best progressed through this Cross, Burley is therefore not housing and it development of route rather than a Local Plan allocation. considered to be is therefore the site is suitable as a housing considered to considered land allocation. be available. achievable.

Parish:

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

9 Land north of Fir Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal This is a large greenfield site outside any of the Tree Road, – the site lies within landowner has issues have defined New Forest villages. The site lies within Cadnam 400m of the New put the site been identified 400m of the New Forest SPA and therefore is not 3.8ha greenfield Forest SPA and is forward for and the considered suitable as a Local Plan housing site. therefore not suitable housing and it development of allocation. for a large greenfield is therefore the site is housing site considered to considered allocation. be available. achievable.

13 Land adjacent to Rejected at Stage 2 No – the Yes - the The site does not relate well to services and The Beeches, – the site does not landowner has landowner has settlements within the National Park. The Romsey Road, relate well to stated that the stated the site is settlement of Ower has very limited services. Ower services and site is not economically settlements within available for viable to the National Park. development. develop and development is achievable.

16 Cadnam Cadnam Works, Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The allocation of this site would entail housing Old Cross – the site is located landowner has issues have development immediately adjacent to Road, Cadnam adjacent to the New put the site been identified SPA/SAC/SSSI and the loss of an employment Existing Forest SPA and is forward for and the site. It is therefore not considered to be suitable employment therefore not suitable housing and it development of as a housing site allocation. site. as a housing site. is therefore the site is

16 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Housing would also considered to considered result in the loss of be available. achievable. an employment site.

23 Cadnam Land at Pollards Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal This is a large greenfield site outside any of the Moor Road, – concerns regarding landowner has issues have defined New Forest villages. While there is Copythorne the scale of put the site been identified potential for some development within Cadnam, 2.8ha greenfield development on a forward for and the the preferred focus is on smaller (preferably site currently large greenfield site. housing and it development of brownfield) sites. used for is therefore the site is grazing. considered to considered be available. achievable.

47 Bartley Garages, Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The site lies within 400m of the New Forest SPA Shepherds - the site lies within landowner has issues have and is therefore not suitable as a housing site Close, Bartley 400m of the New put the site been identified allocation. Forest SPA and is forward for and the therefore not housing and it development of considered to be is therefore the site is suitable for Local considered to considered Plan allocation. be available. achievable.

80 Cadnam ‘Horseshoes’, Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The site has some merit for an infill development Southampton – although the site is landowner has issues have and would not have a wider landscape impact on Road, Cadnam well screened and put the site been identified the National Park. However, the proximity of the 0.75ha may have some forward for and the New Forest SPA means it is not considered greenfield site to merit, the site lies housing and it development of suitable as a housing site allocation. the rear of within 400 metres of is therefore the site is properties from the New Forest SPA considered to considered Southampton and is therefore not be available. achievable. Road. considered suitable.

104 Ower Garden Centre, Rejected at Stage 1 N/A N/A The site was rejected due to concerns over flood Wigley, Ower – the site lies within risk. Flood Risk Zones 2

17 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

and 3 as defined by the latest Environment Agency mapping.

116 Cadnam Corner of Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal This site is a little detached from the main Newbridge – the site is at high landowner has issues have settlement and services in Cadnam and is Road / Romsey risk from surface put the site been identified affected by surface water drainage issues. On the Road, Cadnam water flooding based forward for and the basis of the New Forest SFRA work of 2017 the Agricultural on Environment housing and it development of site is not considered to be appropriate for land. Agency mapping and is therefore the site is allocation through the Local Plan. the New Forest considered to considered SFRA (2017). be available. achievable.

117 Cadnam Land at ‘The Rejected at Stage 2 No – the site Yes - no legal The NPA included this site in its consultation draft Yews’, – this active was originally issues have Local Plan (October 2016). However, following Southampton employment site lies submitted been identified Natural England’s updated advice in Spring 2017, Road, Cadnam immediately adjacent through the and the the site has been deleted form the Local Plan as a to the New Forest ‘Call for Sites’ development of housing site due to the immediate proximity of the SPA and is therefore process. the site is New Forest SPA. In addition, the Authority has not considered to be However a considered received further applications for continuing suitable for housing. more recent achievable. employment use on the site since the original ‘Call application for Sites’ submission in 2015. was submitted for continued employment use of the site.

118 Cadnam Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The NPA consulted on the potential allocation of to Uncle Tom’s – the site is landowner has issues have this site in Summer 2017 as part of the Cabin, Romsey considered to have put the site been identified consultation on potential alternative housing sites. Road, Cadnam development forward for and the The site lies beyond the New Forest SPA 400 Greenfield site. potential. However housing and it development of metre zone but the updated SFFRA (2017) both the Environment is therefore the site is highlighted that the site is affected by surface Agency flood considered to considered water flooding and potential fluvial flooding. On

18 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

mapping and the be available. achievable. this basis it is not considered to be suitable for New Forest SFRA housing allocation in the Local Plan review. (2017) highlight that the site is at high risk from surface water flooding

119 Bartley Land at Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The site adjoins the residential area of Bartley. Southampton – this large landowner has issues have However, it is also located within very close Road, Bartley greenfield site lies put the site been identified proximity to the New Forest SPA and therefore in within very close forward for and the accordance with Natural England’s updated proximity to the New housing and it development of advice of Spring 2017 the site is not considered to Forest SPA and is is therefore the site is be suitable as a potential Local Plan allocation. therefore not considered to considered considered to be a be available. achievable. suitable housing site.

122 Bartley Land at Winsor Rejected at Stage 2 Not currently - Not currently – This site relates reasonably well to the existing Road Bartley – this site relates the landowner although the site settlement. It is located outside the New Forest 2.1ha greenfield reasonably well to has stated that is in single SPA 400 metres zone and is also not affected by site. the local settlement. although the ownership, the flood risk when compared to other parts of the However, access to site is not restricted locality. However, access to the site is an issue the site is an issues immediately access that and therefore it is not considered in its current and therefore the site available, it currently exists state to be a deliverable site that can be included is not currently could be to the sites within the Local Plan. considered to be developed by affects its suitable for 2020. Access availability and residential issues would the achievability development. need to be of residential addressed. development.

165 Cadnam Land to the Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The site is somewhat detached from the south of – development would landowner has issues have settlement of Cadnam and development would Romsey Road, result in housing put the site been identified result in an encroachment into the surrounding Cadnam extending into the forward for and the landscape. In addition the New Forest SFRA largely undeveloped housing and it development of highlights significant issues with surface water

19 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

land to the east of is therefore the site is flooding in this area and therefore it is not Romsey Road. The considered to considered considered to be suitable as a housing allocation. site is also affected be available. achievable. by surface water flooding.

175 Cadnam Land at Rejected at Stage 2- Not currently - Yes - no legal The site lies within 400 metres of the New Forest ‘Hazelmere’, the site lies within the site issues have SPA. The layout of the rural exception site Southampton 400m of the New submission been identified development to the east at Rockram Close does Road Forest SPA and is states that the and the not lend itself to the site being easily accessed, therefore not site is not development of and therefore any development would need to be considered to be a currently the site is access from the A336 which may be an issue. suitable site available, but considered allocation. this could be achievable. addressed.

176 Cadnam Cadnam Rejected at Stage 2 Not currently – Yes - the current This site is in active use as a garden centre and Garden Centre, – the site is currently the site is landowner the landowner states that the site is not currently Southampton operating as a operating as a states that there available for development. In addition, the site lies Road, Cadnam garden centre and is garden centre are no issues within 400 metres of the New Forest SPA and so located within 400m and is relating to legal is not considered to be suitable for a housing of the New Forest therefore not covenants on allocation in the Local Plan. SPA. currently the site. available for residential use.

Parish:

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

157 Ipers Bridge, Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the agent Yes - the This is does not relate well to settlements within Holbury, – the site lies acting on behalf ‘Call for the National Park and there is no safe pedestrian immediately adjacent of the Brownfield access to the nearby settlements located outside

20 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

to the New Forest landowner Sites’ the National Park. In addition the site lies SPA and is therefore states that the submission immediately adjacent to the New Forest SPA and not considered to be site is available states that is therefore not considered to be suitable as a suitable. In addition, for there are no residential allocation. the site is rather development covenants or detached from and this could ransom strips settlements and has be completed affecting the poor pedestrian links by 2020. site and to services. development is therefore achievable.

Parish:

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

17 East Boldre Land adjacent to Rejected at Stage Yes – the site No – the site is This small infill site has merits as a housing site Gaza Avenue 2 – the site lies was put the subject of a given the existing access and the surrounding and Matthews within 400 metres of forward restrictive residential uses. However, the proximity of the Lane, East the New Forest SPA through the covenant which New Forest SPA to the site means that it is not Boldre and is therefore not ‘Call for Sites’ prevents suitable as a housing site allocation. 0.4ha greenfield considered to be process as housing use. site. suitable for housing. being available for housing.

53 East Boldre Open space, Rejected at Stage Yes – the site Unclear - the The site lies within 400 metres of the New Forest Sweyns Lease, 2 – the site lies was put development of SPA and is therefore not suitable as a housing East Boldre within 400 metres of forward the open space site allocation. In addition, development would 0.4ha area of the New Forest through the would require result in the loss of public open space (which is open space. SPA. Development ‘Call for Sites’ compensatory also grazed) which would require alternative would also result in process as provision and it provision. the loss of public being available is not clear how open space. for housing. this could be achieved.

21 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

130 East Boldre Land at Rejected at Stage Yes – the site Yes - no legal The site was included in the Authority’s Strawberry 2 – although the site was put issues have consultation draft Local Plan (October 2016) and Fields, East relates well to the forward been identified was considered to be suitable for residential Boldre surrounding area, through the and the development. However, Natural England’s the proximity of the ‘Call for Sites’ development of updated advice on development close to the New New Forest SPA process as the site is Forest SPA has resulted in the site being deleted means that it is not being available considered from the Submission draft Local Plan. considered to be for housing. achievable. suitable for housing.

Parish: Ellingham, &

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

6 Linford Former Linford Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal The site does not relate well the settlements Park Nursing 2 – the site lies in a landowner has issues have within the National Park. The site is located in Home relatively put the site been identified open countryside and is near to a number of 10ha former inaccessible forward for and the protected habitats, including the New Forest SPA nursing home. location and does housing and it development of which would preclude a housing allocation. not relate well to is therefore the site is Planning permission has been refused prior to services and considered to considered National Park designation for residential use. settlements within be available. achievable. the National Park.

99 South Avon Valley Rejected at Stage N/A N/A The site was rejected at Stage 1 due to flooding Gorley Nurseries 1 – the site lies and nature conservation issues. The whole site within Flood Risk also lies within 400 metres of the New Forest SPA Zone 3 as defined and is therefore not considered suitable as a by the Environment housing site allocation. Agency. Part of the site also has national and international nature conservation designations.

22 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Parish: & Lepe

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

10 Exbury Exbury Estate Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal Rejected at Stage 1 – the site lies within the Yard 1 – the site lies landowner has issues have designated Historic Park & Garden. The site may 0.76ha site within the put the site been identified have some potential for appropriate office and proposed for a designated Historic forward for and the commercial space. mixed use Park & Garden. housing and it development of development is therefore the site is considered to considered be available. achievable.

11 Exbury Land adjacent to Rejected at Stage Yes. A Yes - the The rural village of Exbury has a limited range of Ramblers and Ivy 2 - the village of neighbouring landowner services and is not one of the main settlements Cottage Exbury has a very landowner has states that the where the Authority is considering new housing 1 ha greenfield limited range of an easement to site is in single development. site. services. share the ownership and septic tank with there are no Ivy Cottage ransom strips or and this would other need to be restrictions. factored into any proposals.

12 Exbury Land to the rear Rejected at Stage Yes - the site is Yes - the Estate The rural village of Exbury has a limited range of of Erica Cottage 2 - the village of owned by the confirms the site services and is not one of the main settlements 0.2ha greenfield Exbury has a very Estate who is economically where the Authority is considering new housing site. limited range of confirm it is viable to development. services. available for develop and is development therefore but is not achievable. currently being marketed.

23 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Parish: Fawley

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

26 Fawley Quarry Rejected at Stage Yes - the site Yes - a market The Fawley Quarry site has an agreed restoration 11.8 ha sites 2 – the quarry site is owned by report prepared scheme in place that does not involve residential currently used for has an agreed the Cadland on behalf of the use. The site does have the potential to support sand and gravel restoration plan in Estate who landowner the proposed redevelopment of the adjacent extraction place. The area is state it is indicates that former Fawley Power Station site through currently detached available for there is a viable greenspace provision for example. from local services development. market for and could only be development of considered as part this site. of a wider scheme linked to the redevelopment of the adjacent Power Station site.

27 Calshot Stag Close, This proposal is for N/A N/A This site has been proposed for educational Calshot Road, education use of use, rather than residential use. Calshot the site (as part of a 6.6ha greenfield wider plan for the Given the HSE zones around the Fawley Refinery site proposed for former Power complex, it is accepted that new on-site school a primary school Station site). It has provision as part of the Fawley development will linked to the therefore not been be located within the National Park. redevelopment of assessed in detail Fawley Power for residential use. Station site

49 Calshot Land adjacent to Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal This is a very small site and could be pursued 53 Tristan Close, 2 – this brownfield landowner has issues have through the Development Control process as a Calshot site is below the put the site been identified small rural exceptions site. Consideration would 0.1ha site site size threshold forward for and the need to be given to impacts on neighbouring

24 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

currently used for to be considered for housing and it development of properties / amenity and access. parking. Local Plan is therefore the site is allocation but may considered to considered have the potential be available. achievable. for a small affordable housing development.

50 Calshot Land adjacent to Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal This is a very small site and could be pursued 50 Tristan Close, 2 – this brownfield landowner has issues have through the Development Control process as a Calshot site is below the put the site been identified small rural exceptions site. Consideration would 0.03ha site site size threshold forward for and the need to be given to impacts on neighbouring currently used for to be considered for housing and it development of properties / amenity and access parking and Local Plan is therefore the site is access. allocation but may considered to considered have the potential be available. achievable. for a small affordable housing development.

51 Calshot Parking area and Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal This is a very small site and could be pursued land adjoining 1 2 – this brownfield landowner has issues have through the Development Control process as a Tristan Close, site is below the put the site been identified small rural exceptions site. Consideration would Calshot site size threshold forward for and the need to be given to impacts on neighbouring 0.06ha site to be considered for housing and it development of properties / amenity and access Local Plan is therefore the site is allocation but may considered to considered have the potential be available. achievable. for a small affordable housing development.

63 Calshot Land at St Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal Development would have limited landscape George’s Close, 2 – the site is landowner has issues have impact but would involve the loss of open space Tristan Close, currently in open put the site been identified which would need to be compensated. Given the

25 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Calshot space use and its forward for and the current open space use of the site, it is considered 0.5ha area of loss would need to housing and it development of that adjacent land in the same ownership is more open space. be compensated. is therefore the site is appropriate as a development allocation. considered to considered be available. achievable.

67 Stonehills Land at Stonehill Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal Residential development was refused on the site Farm, Fawley 2 – Stonehills is a landowner has issues have prior to National Park designation due to conflicts 0.6ha greenfield small hamlet and put the site been identified with the development plan at the time. It is site. development would forward for and the relatively well screened site and does have some effectively extend housing and it development of pedestrian and public transport links north to the settlement of is therefore the site is Fawley. Fawley into the considered to considered National Park. be available. achievable.

68 Stonehills Land off Rejected at Stage Yes – the Yes - no legal Residential development refused in the past due Stonehills, Fawley 2 – the site would landowner issues have to conflicts with the development plan. The area is 1.8ha greenfield effectively extend states that been identified characterised by narrow country lanes and site currently used the settlement of development and the pedestrian access is poor. The site forms a large for grazing. Fawley into the could be development of open paddock between Fawley and the settlement Park. completed the site is at Stonehills. within 2 - 3 considered years. achievable.

159 Langley Land adjacent Rejected at Stage Yes - The Yes - the The site lies immediately adjacent to the National Langley Lodge 2 – development of landowner has landowner has Park boundary, which was only established in Gardens this this greenfield stated that the stated that there 2005 following an extensive landscape site would erode site is are no legal assessment. Development of this greenfield site the National Park available now covenants or would not relate well to the settlements within the boundary in this and restrictions on National Park and would result in the area, which was development the use of the neighbouring urban areas extending further into established in 2005 could be site. the National Park which raises in principle following extensive completed by concerns. examination. The 2020. site is therefore not considered to be suitable.

26 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

178 Calshot Site of former Rejected at Stage Yes – the Yes - no legal The site is almost completely overgrown and has Flying Boat Inn, 2 – the site is a little landowner issues have reverted to a greenfield site. The site is slightly Calshot Road, detached form the states that been identified detached from the village of Calshot and there are Calshot village of Calshot. development and the sites closer to the village available. There is the could be development of possibility of the completed the site is local community within 2 - 3 considered preparing a years. achievable. Neighourhood Plan and this site could be progressed through this route.

Parish: Godshill

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

110 Godshill Land adjacent to Rejected at Stage Unknown - the Unknown - the Residential development on the site has been Godshill Farm, 2 - although the site site was not site was not put refused on a number of occasions dating back to Godshill is fairly well located put forward by forward by the the 1960s. The village has some basic services, Currently used for within the village of the owner and owner and it is although it is not served by regular public grazing Godshill, it lies in it is unknown unknown transport. The proximity of the New Forest’s close proximity to a whether the whether Natura 2000 sites means it is not considered to be range of protected site is development is appropriate for a housing site allocation in the habitats and has no available for achievable on Local Plan. regular public development. the site. transport links.

Parish: Hale

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

109 Hale Land adjacent to Rejected at Stage N/A N/A The site lies within the designated Hale Park

27 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Garden Cottage, 1 – the site lies Historic Park and Garden and is therefore not Queen Street, within the considered to be suitable for housing Hale designated Hale development. Park Historic Park and Garden.

Parish:

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

44 Hordle Land adjacent Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal Development of the site would add to the Miranda, Vaggs 2 – this site is not landowner has issues have scattered development which has already Lane, Hordle well located in put the site been identified occurred in this part of the National Park. There Greenfield site relation to existing forward for and the are limited services available close to the site. adjacent to services and housing and it development of existing dwellings settlements within is therefore the site is the National Park considered to considered be available. achievable.

Parish: Hyde

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

100 Depot at Stuckton This site lies N/A N/A This site lies outside the National Park boundary outside the and is therefore under National Park Council’s planning remit. boundary and is therefore under New Forest District Council’s planning remit.

103 Hyde Hyde Garden Rejected at Stage Yes - the site Yes - the ‘Call Previous application for 6 affordable dwellings on

28 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Centre, Gorley 2 – although the has been put for Brownfield the site refused in 2006 due to loss of Lynch, Hyde site is fairly well forward Sites’ employment site; concerns over impacts on located within the through the submission nature conservation interests and impacts on the village of Hyde, it is Authority’s states that Conservation Area. still in active use as ‘Call for residential a garden centre Brownfield development on There may be some potential for underused or and shop. The site Sites’ process the site is vacant parts of the brownfield site to come lies in close for residential achievable. forward as a rural exception site, subject to proximity to the development. consideration of impacts on the adjacent New New Forest SAC Forest SAC. and urban edge impacts would be a consideration.

111 Hyde Land adjacent Rejected at Stage Yes - the site Yes - the site The hamlet of Stuckton is not considered to be a Mabel’s Cottage, 2 – although the has been put has been put suitable location for the focus on new housing Stuckton site is fairly well forward in the forward in the allocations in the National Park. located in relation past for past for possible to surrounding possible residential buildings, the residential development, hamlet of Stuckton development, but is not lacks facilities and but is not currently being has no regular currently being actively public transport actively promoted. links. promoted.

124 Hyde Brookfields Farm, Rejected at Stage N/A N/A The site was rejected at Stage 1 due to concerns Stuckton 1 – parts of the site regarding flood risk. Existing nursery are located within site Flood Risk Zone 3 as defined by the Environment Agency.

29 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Parish: Hythe &

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

18 Hythe Land to the north Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal This is a large greenfield site on the fringes of the of Southampton – development of landowner has issues have National Park where planning permission was Road, Dibden this site would result put the site been identified refused in the past for residential use prior to the 3.35ha greenfield in the neighbouring forward for and the designation of the National Park. Development site currently urban area of Hythe housing and it development of would result in an extension of the built form of used for grazing (outside the Park) is therefore the site is Hythe into the nationally protected landscape of extending into the considered to considered the National Park. protected landscape be available. achievable. of the National Park.

141 Hythe Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the land Yes - the land is This greenfield site does not relate to any of the Vine Cottage, – the site does not is in single in single rural settlements in the National Park. The Southampton relate well to ownership and ownership and boundary of the National Park was established in Road, Hythe settlements within available now. the landowner 2005 followed a detailed landscape assessment the National Park The landowner has confirmed and it is therefore not considered appropriate to and would result in has also their view that extend neighbouring urban areas into the neighbouring urban confirmed their the development National Park through greenfield developments areas extending into willingness to of the site is that would impact on the character of the the nationally work with viable. nationally designated landscape. protected landscape neighbouring of the New Forest. landowners to bring forward a more comprehensive development if required.

30 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Parish: Landford

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

42 Landford Forest View, Development The site is The site is The site has been proposed for gypsy use, Landford potential for gypsy owned by an owned by an rather than housing. The site has been used as Site currently use (rather than existing gypsy existing gypsy a single gypsy pitch for a number of years. It is used as a housing) - the site is who has who has well screened from the surrounding area and single gypsy already in use as a confirmed that confirmed that benefits from an existing access. Landford itself pitch. single gypsy pitch. the site has the site has has a basic range of local services. Proposed use There is an existing capacity for an capacity for an for an access and the site is additional additional pitch. additional well screened from pitch. gypsy pitch. the wider landscape.

112 Landford Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the site Yes - the site Development in this location would comprise Shamba, – although Landford has been put has been put backland development and extend the built form Lyndhurst does have some forward in the forward in the of Landford to the west. It is therefore not Road, Landford basic services, this past for past for possible considered to be a suitable housing site. backland greenfield possible residential development would residential development, detrimentally change development, but is not the character of the but is not currently being area. currently being actively actively promoted. promoted.

158 Landford The New Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - the ‘Call This site is detached from the settlement of Forest Lodge, – the site is detached landowner for Brownfield Landford, with no pavements along road to Southampton from existing states that the Sites’ Landford. It is therefore not considered to be Road, Landford settlements and site is available submission particularly suitable for residential use. residential for made on behalf development in this development of the landowner location would not and this could states that there relate well to services be achieved in are no legal within the National two phases by covenants or Park. 2025 restrictions.

31 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Parish: Lymington & Pennington

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

14 Pennington Land to the Excluded as the N/A N/A The site lies outside the National Park (within north of Ramley site does not lie New Forest District Council’s planning remit) and Road, within the New so has not been assessed by the NPA. Lymington Forest National Park.

71 Lymington Land off The majority of the N/A N/A No dwellings are proposed in the National Park Ridgeway site is within New as part of this ‘Call for Sites’ submission. The Lane, Forest District principle of housing development on the adjacent Lymington Council’s planning land is for New Forest District Council to assess. 6ha greenfield remit - only the site currently access route from used for Ridgeway Lane is grazing. within the National Park.

77 Pennington Wainsford Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal Although close to the built up area of Pennington Road, 2 – the site forms landowner has issues have the site is surrounded by countryside and is Pennington part of the open put the site been identified immediately adjacent to a SSSI. Public transport Grazing land. countryside of the forward for and the links are poor despite the proximity of Lymington. National Park and housing and it is development of does not relate well therefore the site is to existing services considered to considered and settlements. be available. achievable.

146 Pennington Land at Oak Rejected at Stage Yes - The Yes - no legal The site adjoins the urban area of Lymington & Cottage, 50 2 - the site does landowner has issues have Pennington. The National Park boundary was Ramley Road, not relate well to stated that the been identified established in 2005 following a detailed Pennington existing services site is available and the landscape assessment and development in this and settlements. for development of area would have the effect of extending the Development development. the site is adjacent urban area into the nationally protected

32 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

would extend the considered landscape of the New Forest. The site does not neighbouring urban achievable. relate well to settlements within the National Park areas of Lymington and it is not clear how development in this area and Pennington would benefit the local communities within the into the protected National Park. National Park.

147 Pennington Land at Ramley Rejected at Stage Yes - the site Yes - the site has The site adjoins the urban area of Lymington & Road, 2 - the site does has been been promoted Pennington. The National Park boundary was Pennington not relate well to promoted for for residential established in 2005 following a detailed existing services residential development by landscape assessment and development in this and settlements. development by a developer and area would have the effect of extending the Development the landowner is in single adjacent urban area into the nationally protected would extend the who has ownership. There landscape of the New Forest. The site does not neighbouring urban confirmed that are no identified relate well to settlements within the National Park areas of Lymington the site is issues relating to and it is not clear how development in this area and Pennington available for viability or other would benefit the local communities within the into the protected development. legal issues. National Park. National Park.

171 Pennington Sadlers Farm Rejected at Stage Yes - the site Yes - the site has The site is part of scattered development down a Workshops, 2 - site is part of has been been promoted country road, with open countryside around the Lower scattered promoted for for residential site. The site is somewhat separate from nearby Pennington development down residential development by Lymington &Pennington and has no public Lane a country road, with development by a developer and transport links. Residential development would open countryside the landowner is in single also result in the loss of an employment site. around the site. who has ownership. There confirmed that are no identified the site is issues relating to available for viability or other development. legal issues.

33 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Parish: Lyndhurst

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

40 Lyndhurst Land to the rear Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal Previous planning applications for single of Tyrell Lodge, 2 – planning landowner has issues have dwellings on the site have been refused due to Southampton permission on the put the site been identified impacts on the Conservation Area, neighbouring Road site has been forward for and the properties and the A35. The site also lies within 0.15ha site refused in the past housing and it is development of close proximity of the New Forest SPA and so due to a range of therefore the site is would not be a suitable extension to the Defined concerns, including considered to be considered Village boundary. highway access. available. achievable.

45 Lyndhurst Garage court, Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal Given the proximity of the New Forest SPA to the adjacent to 1 2 – this brownfield landowner has issues have Clayhill area, it is not considered appropriate to Beechen Lane, site lies outside of put the site been identified extend the Defined Village boundary to Lyndhurst the defined village forward for and the incorporate this site. The site may have potential 0.03ha garage boundary. It may housing and it is development of as a rural exception site to be progressed through area. have the potential therefore the site is the Development Control process. for a small considered to be considered affordable housing available. achievable. development.

58 Lyndhurst Garden Close, Rejected at Stage Not currently – Yes - no legal The site lies within close proximity to the New Lyndhurst 2 – this brownfield the landowner issues have Forest SPA and therefore is not considered to be 0.07ha garage site is located has stated that been identified suitable as a Local Plan allocation. The site’s site. within 400m of the the site is not and the potential as a rural exception site development is New Forest SPA. currently development of better progressed through the development available, but the site is control process. would be considered available by achievable. 2020.

59 Lyndhurst Garages, Rejected at Stage Not currently – Yes - no legal The site lies within close proximity to the New Northerwood 2 – this brownfield the landowner issues have Forest SPA and therefore is not considered to be

34 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Avenue, site is located has stated that been identified suitable as a Local Plan allocation. The site’s Lyndhurst within 400m of the the site is not and the potential as a rural exception site development is 0.04ha garage New Forest SPA. currently development of better progressed through the development site. available, but the site is control process. would be considered available by achievable. 2020.

60 Lyndhurst Garden Close, Rejected at Stage Not currently – Yes - no legal The site lies within close proximity to the New Lyndhurst 2 – this brownfield the landowner issues have Forest SPA and therefore is not considered to be 0.04ha garage site is located has stated that been identified suitable as a Local Plan allocation. The site’s site. within 400m of the the site is not and the potential as a rural exception site development is New Forest SPA. currently development of better progressed through the development available, but the site is control process. would be considered available by achievable. 2020.

93 Lyndhurst Land adjacent to Rejected at Stage Unknown - the Unknown - the The site is fairly well related to the village of ‘Harmony’, 2 – concerns site was not put site was not put Lyndhurst. However, there are concerns Chapel Lane, regarding the forward by the forward by the regarding the landscape impact of developing the Lyndhurst landscape impact owner and it is owner and it is site. Chapel Lane currently forms a clear 0.75ha of developing the unknown unknown boundary to the defined village. greenfield site site from the whether the site whether currently used countryside to the is available for development is for grazing. south of the village. development. achievable on the site.

94 Lyndhurst Land adjacent to Rejected at Stage Unknown - the Unknown - the The site is within the Lyndhurst Conservation Queen’s House, 2 – although the site was not put site was not put Area and immediately adjacent to a Listed Lyndhurst site is well located forward by the forward by the building. There may be a smaller part of the site 1.5ha site in relation to owner and it is owner and it is (adjoining the surgery and club) that could has comprising services, concerns unknown unknown some development potential. gardens and regarding the whether the site whether parking. development of one is available for development is

35 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

of the few open development. achievable on spaces in the the site. village; loss of trees and impacts on heritage assets.

95 Lyndhurst Fenwick Rejected at Stage No - the site is in Unknown - the The site remains in active healthcare use. Should Hospital, Pikes 2 – the hospital active site was not put it become available, the brownfield site is located Hill, Lyndhurst provides an healthcare use forward by the within the defined village boundary and could important and is not being owner and it is include an element of residential use in the future community service promoted for unknown as part of any comprehensive redevelopment. which should be housing whether retained. development. development is achievable on the site.

96 Lyndhurst Football Ground, Rejected at Stage Unknown – the Unknown - the Although the site adjoins the Defined Village Wellands Road, 2 – the site site was not site was not put boundary of Lyndhurst, it is also immediately Lyndhurst provides an promoted by the forward by the adjacent to the Open Forest and the SPA habitat. important landowner and owner and it is Allied to that, the loss of the sports pitch would recreational facility is current in unknown require replacement provision. On this basis it is for the village and active whether not suitable for a housing site allocation through is located close to recreational use. development is the Local Plan. the New Forest’s achievable on protected habitats. the site.

121a Lyndhurst Ineos site, Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - planning The brownfield part of the site relates relatively Beechen Lane, 2 – the brownfield landowner has consent has well to the settlement. However, significantly this Lyndhurst site has an existing put the site been granted on employment site lies within 400 metres of the access and the forward for the site New Forest SPA and therefore on the basis of potential to be housing and it is previously and Natural England’s advice of Spring 2017 the site redeveloped for a therefore development is is not considered suitable as a residential mix of uses. considered to be considered to be allocation. However, the available. viable. The site proximity of the is in a single

36 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

New Forest SPA ownership. means the site is not considered suitable for housing.

121b Lyndhurst Vernalls Farm, Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal The Vernalls Farm site is a large greenfield site Lyndhurst 2 – development of landowner has issues have falling almost entirely within the New Forest SPA this large put the site been identified 400 metres zone and is therefore not considered predominantly forward for and the to be appropriate for allocation through the Local greenfield site housing and it is development of Plan on the basis of Natural England’s updated would have a therefore the site is advice of May 2017. detrimental impact considered to be considered on the landscape of available. achievable. the National Park. The majority of the site lies within 400m of the New Forest SPA.

127 Lyndhurst Land to the rear Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal The site lies outside of the current defined village of Swiss 2 – the site lies landowner has issues have boundary of Lyndhurst and within 400 metres of Cottage, Clay within 400m of the put the site been identified the New Forest SPA. On the basis of Natural Hill, Lyndhurst New Forest SPA forward for and the England’s updated advice in May 2017 it would and is therefore not housing and it is development of be inappropriate to extend the settlement considered to be a therefore the site is boundary or to allocate the site for development suitable housing considered to be considered given the proximity of the SPA to the site. site allocation or available. achievable. amendment to the existing defined village boundary.

137 Lyndhurst Land north of Rejected at Stage Yes - the whole Yes - no legal The development of this 15ha site would 2 – the majority of site is in the sole issues have represent major development within the National Road, the site lies within ownership of the been identified Park. The site would represent by far the largest

37 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Lyndhurst. 15.6 400m of the New Trust who have and the housing site in the National Park and would need hectare Forest SPA and is stated that the development of to be justified against the NPPF’s major greenfield site. therefore not site is available the site is development test. In addition, the majority of the suitable for and could be considered site lies within 400m of the New Forest SPA and housing. This large developed within achievable. therefore is not considered suitable for residential greenfield site 3 years. development. would also represent a major development in the National Park.

Parish: Melchet Park & Plaitford

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

102 Plaitford Former B & W Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes – the This large redundant horticultural site has been Nurseries site, – the site lies landowner has landowner vacant for more than a decade. The site is located Plaitford immediately put the site stated that immediately adjacent to the internationally adjacent to the new forward for viability will protected habitats in the New Forest and is Forest SPA and is housing and it depend on mix therefore not appropriate for a housing allocation therefore not is therefore of affordable in the Authority’s Local Plan. The site is suitable as a considered to and market considered to be more appropriate for housing site be available. housing employment use. allocation. In proposed. addition, it does not relate particularly well to surrounding settlements and services.

38 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Parish: Milford-on-Sea

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

39 Aubrey Farm Rejected at Stage 1 Yes - the Yes - no legal Part of the Vidle Van Farm buildings lie within and Vidle Van – Several areas of landowner has issues have Flood Zone 3 and the site at Aubrey Farm lies Farm, Keyhaven the site fall within the put the site been identified immediately adjacent to Flood Zone 3. Proposal to use Environment forward for and the a number of Agency’s Flood housing and it development of parcels and land Zone 3. is therefore the site is and buildings for considered to considered a mix of uses. be available. achievable.

Parish:

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

79 Castle Castle Malwood Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal The site is remote from any settlements or Malwood Depot, Minstead 2 – the site lies landowner has issues have facilities. It is surrounded by the open landscapes 6.2ha within 400m of the put the site been identified of the National Park and there are nationally / employment site. New Forest SPA, in forward for and the internationally protected habitats nearby. a relatively housing and it development of inaccessible is therefore the site is location and does considered to considered not relate well to be available. achievable. services and settlements within the National Park.

167 Minstead Hazel Hill Yard, Rejected at Stage Yes - the Yes - no legal The site is slightly detached from the small village Seamans Lane, 2 – the site lies landowner has issues have of Minstead, which itself only has 3 essential London within 400m of the put the site been identified services and no public transport links. The site Minstead, New Forest SPA forward for and the also lies in close proximity to the New Forest SPA Lyndhurst and is not housing and it development of and the Local Plan is not looking to allocate sites

39 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

particularly well is therefore the site is for single dwellings. related to existing considered to considered settlements and be available. achievable. services.

Parish:

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

1 Ower Agricultural field Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the site Yes - no legal An application of use of the site for 4 travelling situated - Previous was put issues have showpeople plots was refused in February 2015 adjacent to application refused forward by the been identified due to concerns regarding the landscape impact Romsey Road, on the site in 2015. landowner and and the of the development at this prominent gateway to Ower The updated is considered development of the National Park. There are some locational Proposal for Assessment of to be the site is merits to the site and a brownfield development in use as a needs for travelling available. considered the area may be preferable. travelling showpeople achievable. showpeople site identifies a need within the National Park. Concerns regarding landscape impact of greenfield development.

15 Bartley Land opposite Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal Development of the site would add to the The Thatched – the relatively large landowner has issues have scattered development which has already Cottage, Bartley greenfield site is not put the site been identified occurred in this part of the parish, within an Road, Bartley well located in forward for and the essentially open agricultural landscape some 1.7ha greenfield relation to existing housing and it development of distance from the village of Bartley. site. services and is therefore the site is settlements within considered to considered the National Park. be available. achievable. Bartley has limited local facilities.

40 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

64 Woodlands Millvina Close, Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the site Yes - no legal This area of Woodlands has only a basic range of Woodlands - there are relatively was put issues have services in the area. On this basis it is not limited services in forward by the been identified considered to be an appropriate focus for housing the area and landowner and and the land allocations and small-scale development in therefore Woodlands is considered development of the locality would be better suited to rural is considered to be a to be the site is exception site development. suitable focus for available. considered new housing achievable. allocations. The site is better suited to a rural exception site development.

70 Woodlands Woodlands Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the site Yes - no legal Planning permission was refused in the 1950s for Road, - this greenfield site was put issues have larger scale residential development in this area. Woodlands, forms an open, forward by the been identified Development of the site would add to the Netley Marsh undeveloped landowner and and the scattered development which has already Currently used paddock along the is considered development of occurred in this part of the National Park for grazing. long linear line for to be the site is development. There available. considered are limited local achievable. facilities in the vicinity of the site.

81 Loperwood Loperwood Rejected at Stage 2 In the longer Yes - no legal The site does not relate well to the settlements Park Farm, – this greenfield site term - the issues have within the National Park and is separated from Calmore does not relate well landowner has been identified Calmore by the A326. It is therefore not 1.2 ha site to services and stated that the and the considered to be a suitable housing site. within curtilage settlements within land is not development of of existing the National Park. currently the site is dwelling. available, but considered would be by achievable. 2020 and 2025.

41 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

105 Ower Golden Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the site Yes - no legal This predominantly greenfield is located on the Meadow, – the site lies in a has been for issues have edge of the National Park and is not particularly Romsey Road, relatively sale for some been identified well located in relation to existing settlements, Ower inaccessible location time and is and the although there are public transport links close to and does not relate considered to development of the site. The site is not considered to be suitable well to services and be available. the site is for a housing allocation, but may have some merit settlements within considered as a travelling showpeople’s site given its the National Park. It achievable. brownfield status and proximity to the main road is therefore not network on the edge of the National Park. considered to be a suitable housing site.

128 Woodlands 300 Woodlands Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The site does not relate well to services and Road, – the site does not landowner has issues have settlements within the National Park. Further infill Woodlands relate well to put the site been identified along Woodlands Road would further reinforce the 0.05ha services and forward for and the ribbon development along the road. The NPA residential settlements within housing and it development of would not be looking to allocate sites for single curtilage. the National Park is therefore the site is dwellings through its Local Plan. and would add to the considered to considered linear, ribbon be available. achievable. development in the area.

138 Ashurst Land at Ashurst Rejected at Stage 2 Yes – the site Yes - no legal The site does not relate well to the existing Bridge Bridge – the site does not has been put issues have settlements in the National Park and would relate well to the forward by the been identified instead appear to extend the neighbouring urban settlements and landowner and and the areas of Calmore and Totton into the National services within the is therefore development of Park. Its allocation would be contrary to the National Park and considered to the site is NPPF’s requirement for development in rural would effectively be available. considered areas to be focused toward settlements and extend the achievable. services. neighbouring urban areas into the nationally protected landscape of the National Park.

42 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

145 Woodlands Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - The site Yes - The site This area of Woodlands Road is characterised by to 229 – there are relatively has been put has been put generally linear development and there is only a Woodlands limited services the forward by a forward by a basic range of services in the area. On this basis Road, area and therefore developer who developer who it is not considered to be an appropriate focus for Woodlands the site is not has an has an housing land allocations and small-scale considered suitable interested in interested in the development in the locality would be better suited for a housing the site. The site. The site is to rural exception site development. allocation. site is therefore therefore considered to be considered to available and be available. achievable.

183 Netley Land at Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal Development in this location would perpetuate the Marsh Ringwood – this small owner has issues have rather linear character of residential development Road, Netley brownfield site may stated that the been identified on this part of Southampton Road. The site may Marsh be better suited to a site is and the have some merit as a potential rural exceptions rural exception site available for development of site but is not considered to be particularly development. development the site is suitable as a Local Plan housing allocation. between 2020 considered and 2025. achievable.

184 Netley Hand Car Wash Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal This is a very small site (capacity for two Marsh site, Ringwood – this small owner has issues have dwellings) that would be more appropriately Road, Netley brownfield site stated that the been identified pursued through the planning application route Marsh (capacity of 2 site is and the rather than a Local Plan allocation. dwellings) may be available for development of better suited to a development the site is rural exception site between 2020 considered development. and 2025. achievable.

43 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Parish:

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

24 Wootton Land at Wootton Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The site lies within 400m of the New Forest SPA. Hall Farm, – the relatively large landowner has issues have Development of the site would also add to the Tiptoe Road, greenfield site is not put the site been identified scattered development which has already New Milton well located in forward for and the occurred in this part of the National Park. There 1.6ha greenfield relation to services housing and it development of are limited services available close to the site and site currently and settlements is therefore the site is it is therefore not considered to be a suitable site used for within the National considered to considered to focus new housing. grazing. Park. The site also be available. achievable. lies within 400m of the New Forest SPA.

30 Bashley Land adjacent Rejected at Stage 2 Unclear - the Unclear - The Development of the site would add to the Redcliffe – this site is not well site has not site has not scattered development which has already Garden Centre, located in relation to been put been put occurred in this part of the National Park. There Bashley Road, existing services and forward by the forward by the are limited services available close to the site. The New Milton settlements within landowner and landowner and Bashley area is not considered to be an Small area the National Park therefore its therefore its appropriate focus for new development and the currently used availability is achievability is deliverability of this site is unclear. for parking. uncertain. unclear.

31 Bashley Land south of Rejected at Stage 2 Unclear – the Unclear – the There are limited services available close to the Bashley Post - The site lacks any Town Council Town Council site. Planning permission for a single residential Office pedestrian access has identified has identified a caravan on the site refused and dismissed at Small site along the road. The a possible possible appeal in 2009. currently used village of Bashley problem with problem with for car storage has only a very basic ownership with ownership with range of services. a small strip of a small strip of land between land between the highway the highway and and the site. the site.

44 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

32 Bashley Former Bashley Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - an Yes - the ‘Call Although previously in employment use, the site is Saw Mill – planning outline for Sites’ now largely overgrown. Previous applications for 0.5ha former permission for application for submission residential use have been refused for a variety of commercial saw residential use has residential confirms that reasons, including concerns over highways mill on the edge been previously development development is access and visibility. Bashley is not a focus for of Bashley refused due to on the site was achievable and new housing site allocations in the Local Plan. highway concerns. submitted in the Authority The site may have potential as a rural exception Bashley has limited 2017, received an site. services and is not a confirming that outline focus for new the site is application in housing allocations available. 2017 for in the Local Plan. development.

33 Bashley Land adjacent to Rejected at Stage 2 Unclear - the Unclear - The Planning permissions have been repeatedly Sunnyholm’, – the settlement of site was site was refused on the site for residential development Bashley Bashley has limited proposed by proposed by dating back to the 1950s. The settlement of Common Road services and is not a New Milton New Milton Bashley has limited services and is not a focus for Small plot in the focus for new Town Council Town Council in new development in the Authority’s Local Plan. linear development in the in 2009, rather 2009, rather development Authority’s Local than the land than the land along Bashley Plan. owner. owner. Common Road

34 Land adjacent to Rejected at Stage 2 Unclear - the Unclear - The The site is located in a relatively isolated area of Ossemsley – this a relatively site was site was the National Park, well away from any settlements Manor isolated site that is proposed by proposed by or services. Residential development would also not close to services New Milton New Milton involve the loss of allotments. or facilities. Town Council Town Council in Ossemsley itself is a in 2009, rather 2009, rather small cluster of than the land than the land buildings. owner. owner.

35 Bashley Bashley Cross Rejected at Stage 2 Unclear - the Unclear - The The original pair of dwellings on the site were Roads, opposite – the site is detached site was site was permitted as agricultural worker’s dwellings. The junction with from the limited proposed by proposed by site lies in an open location over a kilometre from

45 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Stem Lane services in Bashley New Milton New Milton the nearest settlement and is not considered to be and is considered to Town Council Town Council in a suitable location for additional housing be a suitable location in 2009, rather 2009, rather development. for new than the land than the land development. owner. owner.

36 Bashley Ossemsley Rejected at Stage 2 Unclear - the Unclear - The This relatively large greenfield site has an open South Drive – – this is a relatively site was site was aspect to the north and west and is currently an Junction with large greenfield site proposed by proposed by open pasture. Bashley itself has a limited range of Bashley Road on the edge of a New Milton New Milton services and the site is not particularly accessible Currently used settlement (Bashley) Town Council Town Council in by means other than the car. an open pasture with very limited in 2009, rather 2009, rather services and is not a than the land than the land suitable focus for owner. owner. new development in the Local Plan.

136 New Milton Land north east Rejected at Stage 1 N/A N/A The site is not considered to be suitable for of Pennywell – the site includes residential development due to flood risk. Gardens, New land within flood risk Milton zone 3 as defined by the Environment Agency.

156 Bashley Silver Street Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no issues The settlement of Bashley is not considered to be Nursery, – this site is not well landowner have been an appropriate focus for new housing Bashley Road, located in relation to states that the identified development given the limited range of services. Bashley existing services and site is regarding the The emerging New Milton Neighbourhood Plan settlements within available for achievability of supports this position and confirms that sites the National Park. development developing the within Bashley are more appropriately progressed and could be site. as rural exception sites. completed by 2020.

46 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Parish: Redlynch

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

114 Redlynch Milkhills Farm, Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the site Yes - the site The site does not relate well to existing Goggs Lane, – the brownfield site is has been put has been put settlements and is not an appropriate focus for Redlynch detached from local forward in the forward in the new residential development through a Local Plan services and past for past for possible allocation. The site does not adjoin and existing settlements (Redlynch possible residential defined village nor is it located in a settlement is 1.2km away). residential development, where local services either are available, or a development, but is not likely to be provided during the Local Plan period. but is not currently being currently being actively actively promoted. promoted.

115 Redlynch Orchards, Kiln Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the site Yes - the site There is a significant TPO designation all along Lane, Redlynch – the settlement of has been put has been put the road frontage of the site which restricts Redlynch has some forward in the forward in the access. basic facilities. past for past for possible However, the site is possible residential quite prominent and residential development, has protected trees. development, but is not but is not currently being currently being actively actively promoted. promoted.

150 Redlynch Land at Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The site relates reasonably well to the settlement Rollington – settlement of landowner has issues have of Redlynch which does have some basic Bungalow, Redlynch has a put the site been identified services. The settlement of Redlynch is not a Princes Close, limited range of forward for and the focus for new housing land allocations in the Redlynch services and therefore housing and it development of Authority’s Local Plan due to the limited is not identified within is therefore the site is employment opportunities but the site could the Local plan considered to considered alternatively be considered through the rural

47 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

settlement hierarchy be available. achievable. exception site route to meet some of the identified as a suitable location housing needs in this rural community. for further open market housing allocations. The site has potential as a rural exception site.

151 Redlynch Land at Goggs Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The site is on the outer fringes of Redlynch, and is Lane, Redlynch – the landowner is landowner has issues have situated on a narrow rural lane with no footpath. seeking 5 open put the site been identified The site is detached from the village and would market dwellings forward for and the result in a relatively isolated residential which does not housing and it development of development in the open countryside. conform to the is therefore the site is Authority’s planning considered to considered policies. The site is on be available. achievable. the outer fringes of Redlynch, situated on a narrow rural lane with no footpath.

Parish: Ringwood

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

3 , Land of Hillside Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - The Yes - no legal The site lies adjacent to the settlement of Ringwood Cottage, – although the site is landowner issues have Ringwood (located outside the National Park). Cowpitts Lane, related to existing has stated been identified Therefore there is an in principle concern Poulner housing, development that the site is and the regarding the extension of neighbouring urban Common, would result in the available for development of areas into the protected landscape of the National Ringwood neighbouring urban development. the site is Park. Greenfield site. area of Ringwood considered (outside the Park) achievable extending into the National Park.

48 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

74 Hightown, Land at Lynes The land within the N/A N/A The housing element of this proposal lies entirely and Ringwood Farm, east and National Park (4ha) is outside the National Park within New Forest 75 west of Noule proposed for SANG District Council’s planning remit. It is for New Lane, Ringwood use linked to the Forest District Council to assess the housing 4ha site within proposed residential potential of the site through their Local Plan National Park. development on the review. Proposed to be 28ha site west of used as a Noule Lane (outside SANG to serve the Park). It is adjacent therefore for New residential Forest District development Council to assess the housing potential of the site outside the Park.

76 Ringwood Land north of The land within the N/A N/A The housing element of this proposal lies entirely Moortown Lane, National Park (11ha) outside the National Park within New Forest Ringwood is proposed for SANG District Council’s planning remit. It is for New 11ha site within use linked to the Forest District Council to assess the housing the National proposed residential potential of the site through their Local Plan. Park. Proposed development on the to be used as a site to the west. SANG to serve (outside the Park). It the adjacent is therefore for New residential Forest District development Council to assess the housing potential of the site outside the Park.

148 Ringwood Forest Corner The site has been N/A N/A The site has been proposed for employment Farm, Ringwood proposed for purposes and has therefore not been assessed as employment purposes a potential housing site. and has therefore not

49 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

been assessed as a potential housing site.

163 Ringwood Hedge House, Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - The Yes - no legal This site is not well sited in relation to existing Hill, – this small site (2 landowner issues have settlements within the National Park and would Forest Corner, dwellings are has stated been identified represent the loss of an employment site. With Hangersley, proposed) is not that the site is and the only 2 dwellings proposed, the site is better taken Ringwood located particularly available for development of forward through the development control route well in terms of development. the site is rather than a Local Plan allocation. settlements and considered services. achievable.

Parish:

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

20 Bransgore Land north of Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - The Yes - no legal The proposed large greenfield development Burnt House - development of this landowner issues have (8.1ha) would extend the built form of Bransgore Lane, large greenfield site states that the been identified into the surrounding open countryside of the Bransgore would result in the site is and the nationally protected landscape of the National 8.1ha greenfield neighbouring urban available and development of Park. site. area of Bransgore could be the site is (outside the Park) developed in considered extending into the next 5 achievable. agricultural land in years. the National Park.

21 Bransgore Land north of Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - The Yes - no legal The proposed development is less visible from the Derritt Lane, - development of this landowner has issues have open countryside around Bransgore. It would Bransgore large greenfield site stated that the been identified however, extend the built form of Bransgore into 0.5ha greenfield would result in the site is and the the nationally protected landscape of the site currently in neighbouring urban available for development of surrounding National Park which raises in- agricultural use. area of Bransgore development. the site is principle concerns. (outside the Park) considered

50 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

extending into achievable. agricultural land within the National Park.

22 Bransgore Land off Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - The Yes - no legal The proposed development would extend the built Ringwood - development of this landowner has issues have form of Bransgore into the surrounding open Road, large greenfield site stated that the been identified countryside of the nationally protected National Bransgore would result in the site is and the Park which raises in-principle concerns. 3.3ha greenfield neighbouring urban available for development of site currently in area of Bransgore development. the site is agricultural use extending into considered agricultural land achievable. within the National Park

106 Bransgore Hague Rejected at Stage 2 Unknown – the Unknown – the There are concerns regarding the principle of Nurseries, Burnt – the site has an site has been site has been extending neighbouring urban areas into the House Lane, open aspect to the identified from identified from National Park. If the site were to come forward, it Bransgore surrounding National discussions discussions with would be more appropriate as a rural exception Park landscape. with planning planning officers site rather than a housing site allocation. The Development would officers and and therefore its settlement of Bransgore is also the focus for result in the therefore its achievability significant development in the New Forest District neighbouring urban availability would need to Local Plan, focusing on the area outside of the area of Bransgore would need to be explored. National Park. (outside the Park) be explored. extending into the National Park.

172 Bransgore Summers Rush, Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - The site is The settlement boundary of Bransgore – which 78 Burnt House – the site is not landowner has in single also forms the National Park boundary – is clearly Lane, related to any stated that the ownership. The defined by Burnt House Lane. As is Bransgore settlement in the site is landowner state acknowledged within the landowner’s ‘Call for National Park; and is immediately that the delivery Brownfield Sites’ submission, development in this quite visually available. of a residential location would read as an extension of Bransgore

51 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

separated from the scheme on the into the National Park and the site is therefore not rest of the settlement site is considered to be suitable. of Bransgore. The considered to be area has a rural a viable and character. deliverable proposal.

Parish: Sway

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

4 Pitmore Drays Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes – although The site is detached from the main settlements Lane Nurseries, – concerns regarding landowner has the site has an within the National Park and therefore is not well Pitmore Lane, residential stated that it existing use related to transport links and local services (such Sway development in an would be value and as schools). Development would also result in the 2.6ha site area that is not well available residential loss of an employment site. currently related to any within 1 year. development comprising services or would need to horticultural settlements within provide a glasshouses. the National Park. reasonable return for the landowner.

43 Sway Land at Planning permission N/A N/A Planning permission was granted for the Coombe was granted for the development of 4 dwellings on the site in Grange, development of 4 December 2016 (application ref. 16/00457) Coombe Lane, dwellings on the site Sway in December 2016 Existing care (application ref. home on large 16/00457) plot.

72 Sway Sway Garage Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal Although the site would represent previously and Workshops, – the site is currently landowner issues have developed land it is located some distance outside

52 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Barrows Lane, in employment use, states that the been identified the main settlement and is accessed by a narrow Sway is detached from the site is not and the lane. 0.43ha of mixed village of Sway and currently development of use lacks access to local available, but the site is employment. facilities on foot. could be considered developed by achievable. 2020.

120 Pitmore Pitmore Farm, Rejected at Stage 2 Unknown – the Unknown - the The site is detached from the main settlements Lane Pitmore Lane, – concerns regarding site is not site was not put within the National Park and therefore is not well Sway residential being actively forward by the related to transport links and local services (such development in an promoted for owner and it is as schools). Development would also result in the area that is not well housing by the unknown loss of an employment site related to any landowner. whether services or development is settlements within achievable on the National Park. the site.

134 Sway Land at Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - The Yes - no legal The site is detached from the main village of Sway Oakfield, – the site is detached landowner has issues have and is located on a rural road with no dedicated Boundway Hill, form the village of stated that the been identified footpaths. Sway Sway and site is and the development would available for development of represent further infill development. the site is in an area considered characterised by achievable. piecemeal development.

142 Sway Land rear of Rejected at Stage 2 Unknown – the Unknown - the The site is relatively well located for the services Jubilee Court / - site appears more site is not site was not put and facilities within the village of Sway. However, Hollies Close, related to the being actively forward by the the access to the land – which itself appears to be Sway adjoining countryside promoted for owner and it is in a number of ownerships – may be an issue and than to the nearby housing by the unknown its availability is not clear. settlement of Sway landowner. whether

53 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

and due to its development is availability being achievable on unclear the site is not the site. considered to be suitable.

149 Sway Land at South Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The site has a rural character and is largely Sway Lane, – the site is not landowner has issues have surrounded by open fields which appear to be in Sway contiguous to the stated that two been identified an agricultural use or as paddocks. There are a defined village parcels of land and the few scattered, low density residential properties boundary of Sway are available, development of around the site. There is no pavement on South has a very rural with potentially the site is Sway Lane – the services in Sway not safely character with fields another 4 considered walkable. The site is detached from the existing and mature parcels of land achievable. Defined Village boundary and is not considered landscaping. in different appropriate for a residential allocation. Pedestrian links from ownership the site to the village available. centre are poor.

173 Sway Former Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The site is detached from the settlement of Sway Arnewood Court – the site does not landowner has issues have (1.35km away) and is not considered to be a Turkey Farm, relate well to stated that the been identified sustainable or suitable location to focus new Barrows Lane, settlements within site is and the housing development within the National Park. Sway the National Park available for development of and is not close to development. the site is local facilities and considered services. achievable.

177 Sway The Silver Hind, Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal This site is in the defined village of Sway with the Station Road, – the site lies within landowner has issues have associated community facilities and proximity to Sway the defied shopping stated that the been identified public transport. However, housing would be frontage of Sway and site is and the contrary to the ‘development plan’ which seeks to solely residential use available for development of maintain the defined village shopping frontages would be contrary to development. the site is and prevent their loss to higher value uses such the development considered as a residential. It is therefore not considered to plan. achievable. be suitable.

54 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Parish: Wellow

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

98 Canada Abbotts Farm, Rejected at Stage 2 Unknown – Unknown - The site has been the subject of previous Canada –the site lies within although the the site was planning enquiries. However, it is also located Currently in 400m of the New site has been not put within close proximity of the New Forest SPA and agricultural / Forest SPA and is the subject of forward by is therefore not considered appropriate as a horticultural use therefore not previous the owner potential housing site allocation in the Local Plan. considered to be planning and it is In addition, the settlement of Canada and very suitable. enquiries. unknown few facilities. whether development is achievable on the site.

Parish: Whiteparish

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

107 Whiteparish Land south of Rejected at Stage 2 Unknown – the Yes - no legal The site is detached from the main settlements Jewsons, – concerns regarding site has been issues have within the National Park. Development would also Common Road, residential identified been result in the loss of an employment site. Whiteparish development in an following a identified and area that is not well number of the related to any planning development services or enquiries. The of the site is settlements within the site is not being considered Park. actively achievable. promoted for residential use.

166 Whiteparish The Pound, Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the site is Unknown - The site is in a relatively isolated location, Common Road, – the site does not in a single part of the detached form the village of Whiteparish.

55 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Whiteparish relate well to existing landownership site is a The site also appears to include some land settlements and and the owner Registered designated as a common and it has not been services and is not states that the Common. An confirmed whether this designation has been considered to be a site is available application to formally removed. suitable location to now. remove this focus residential designation is development. in progress. At this stage it is not possible to conclude development is achievable.

Parish:

Ref. Settlement Address Suitability Availability Achievability Summary of reasons for rejection

46 Woodgreen Land between 10 Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes - no legal The site is on the edge of the small village of & 11 Hill Close – the site is located landowner has issues have Woodgreen and lies within 400 metres of the New Estate, within 400 metres of put the site been Forest SPA. Woodgreen the New Forest SPA forward for identified and 0.04ha site and is therefore not housing and it the considered to be is therefore development suitable for a housing considered to of the site is site allocation. be available. considered achievable.

108 Woodgreen Land adjacent to Permission granted N/A N/A Permission granted in March 2015 (application Ivydene in March 2015 reference 14/01033) to incorporate redundant Woodgreen (application reference builders yard into residential curtilage of Ivydene - 14/01033) to now implemented so site no longer available. incorporate redundant builders

56 New Forest National Park Submission draft Local Plan 2016 - 2036 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

yard into residential curtilage of Ivydene - now implemented so site no longer available.

174 Woodgreen Land to the rear Rejected at Stage 2 Yes - the Yes – the The site relates well to the settlement of of The Horse and – the site lies within landowner has landowner Woodgreen. However, the site lies within 400 Groom, High 400 metres of the stated that the wishes to metres of the New Forest SPA and therefore on Street, New Forest SPA. In site is available secure the basis of Natural England’s latest advice Woodgreen addition, access to now. residential (2017) is not considered to be suitable as a the site from ‘The development housing allocation. Access to the site may also be Alley’ may be an to assist in challenging given the existing width of ‘The Alley’. issue. funding the improvements at the pub.

57