DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding Neighbourhood Food Access: Practices and Perspectives of Residents of Scarborough Village, Toronto

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding Neighbourhood Food Access: Practices and Perspectives of Residents of Scarborough Village, Toronto Understanding Neighbourhood Food Access: Practices and Perspectives of Residents of Scarborough Village, Toronto by Rebecca Clare Jacobs A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Geography and Planning University of Toronto © Copyright by Rebecca Clare Jacobs 2017 Understanding Neighbourhood Food Access: Practices and Perspectives of Residents of Scarborough Village, Toronto Rebecca Clare Jacobs Master of Arts Department of Geography and Planning University of Toronto 2017 Abstract Within food access research, little attention has been given to the perspectives and practices of residents in food insecure neighbourhoods. Taking a people-centred approach and using semi- structured interviews, this thesis explores food access through the day-to-day practices, strategies, challenges, perspectives, and emotions of residents of Scarborough Village, a low- income and food insecure urban neighbourhood in Toronto, Canada. The findings of this research are used to argue that including the voices of those commonly marginalised in the decision-making process of neighbourhood food environments is an important and valuable step towards a more just food system. To include these voices, more urban food access research and action needs to shift its approach from simplistic understandings of food security toward more comprehensive understanding of food access based on the concepts of food justice and food sovereignty. Only by doing so will urban food access research realise the often complex, context- specific needs of those it seeks to assist. ii Acknowledgments This research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC); The Government of Ontario; and the University of Toronto, Faculty of Arts & Sciences. Thank you to my supervisor, Dr. Thembela Kepe, for constant guidance and support, and to my committee members Dr. Sarah Wakefield and Dr. Sharlene Mollett. Thank you to my family, friends, and colleagues at work and at the University of Toronto for encouraging and inspiring me along the way. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... vii List of Appendices ....................................................................................................................... viii Chapter 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................1 1.1. Area of Research ..................................................................................................................3 1.2. Food Discourses ...................................................................................................................4 1.3. Food Access in Toronto .......................................................................................................7 1.4. Research Approach ............................................................................................................10 Chapter 2 A Framework of Justice ................................................................................................12 2.1. Understanding Justice ........................................................................................................13 2.2. Seeking Justice in the Food Literature ...............................................................................14 2.2.1. Food Security .........................................................................................................15 2.2.2. Food Justice and Sovereignty ................................................................................16 2.3. Practicing a Theory of Justice ............................................................................................17 Chapter 3 Methods: Understanding Food Access from Residents’ Perspectives and Practices ....20 3.1. Positionality of the Researcher ..........................................................................................20 3.2. Using Reflexivity ...............................................................................................................23 3.3. Area of study ......................................................................................................................23 3.4. Personal Observation .........................................................................................................25 3.5. Interview Recruitment .......................................................................................................26 3.6. The Interview Process ........................................................................................................28 3.7. Transcribing the Data .........................................................................................................30 3.8. Coding the Data .................................................................................................................31 3.9. Mapping the Data ...............................................................................................................32 iv 3.10. Writing Up ........................................................................................................................33 Chapter 4 Usage and Understandings of Scarborough Village’s Food Environment ...................34 4.1. Demographics of participants ............................................................................................34 4.2. Participant Demographics vs. Neighbourhood Demographics ..........................................36 4.3. Stores, Markets, and Food Banks ......................................................................................43 4.4. Eating Out ..........................................................................................................................44 4.5. Decision-Making and Coping Strategies ...........................................................................47 4.6. Challenges, Barriers, and Frustrations ...............................................................................49 4.7. Incentives, Motivations, and Enjoyment ...........................................................................50 4.8. Dietary Need and Health ....................................................................................................51 4.9. Pricing and Value of Food .................................................................................................52 4.10. Transportation ..................................................................................................................53 4.11. Sentiments and Emotions .................................................................................................54 4.12. Potential Changes and Improvements ..............................................................................55 4.13. Unique Findings from the Scarborough Village Case Study ...........................................56 Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusion ...........................................................................................63 5.1. Comparing the Literature: Toronto and Beyond ................................................................64 5.2. Limitations of the Literature ..............................................................................................68 5.3. From Food Security to Food Justice and Sovereignty .......................................................70 5.3.1. Geographic Proximity and Practices ......................................................................71 5.3.2. Quality food ...........................................................................................................73 5.3.3. Relative Food Access and Food Choice ................................................................74 5.3.4. Transparency and Trust..........................................................................................75 5.4. Taking Action ....................................................................................................................77 5.5. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................78 References ......................................................................................................................................80 v Appendices .....................................................................................................................................89 vi List of Figures Figure 1: Location of Scarborough Village, Toronto Source: Neighbourhood Demographic Estimates, Scarborough Village. City of Toronto: 2011.............................................................. 24 Figure 2: Scarborough Village - Political Borders Source: Neighbourhood Demographic Estimates, Scarborough Village. City of Toronto: 2011.............................................................. 25 Figure 3: Participant Gender n=30 ................................................................................................ 36 Figure 4: Gender – Scarborough Village City of Toronto, 2011 n=16,609 .................................. 36 Figure 5: Population Age Research
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
    City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Settlement
    HISTORICAL SETTLEMENT CHAPTER 3 The period of historical settlement in the Highland Creek watershed began in about 1650 when aboriginal populations first made contact with European explorers and settlers. A major landmark on the north shore of Lake Ontario, the Scarborough Highlands lent their name to the creek immediately below them from the beginning. Its Mississauga name of “Yat.qui.I.be.no.nick”, recorded in 1796, and all subsequent names reflect its geographical position as the first creek below the high land. Travellers going westward on the lake would often camp at the mouth of the Highland Creek rather than attempt a passage along the base of the Bluffs in darkness or bad weather. The following sections provide an overview of the historical period including contact between aboriginal and Euro-Canadian peoples, key characteristics of the successive periods of settlement, the impact of this settlement on the environment, and a summary of heritage resources found in the watershed. 3.1 CONTACT 1650 TO 1800 Following the decimation and ultimate dispersal of the Petun and Huron by the Iroquois in 1650, southern Ontario was uninhabited for a few years before the Iroquois moved into the area to establish a number of large villages along the north shore of Lake Ontario for the exploitation of the local fur resources. One such village was Ganatsekiagon, located on the Rouge River. No villages of this size and importance have been found in the Highland Creek watershed, but evidence shows that the resources of Highland Creek were used by the native peoples of these villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Assessment and Cultural Heritage Assessment Reports
    Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto SCARBOROUGH-MALVERN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT TRANSIT PROJECT ASSESSMENT STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT – APPENDICES APPENDIX C5 – ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AND CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT REPORTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS DIVISION PROJECT PERSONNEL Senior Project Manager: Robert Pihl, MA CAHP Partner and Senior Archaeologist Manager, Environmental Assessments Cultural Heritage Assessment Report: Project Manager: Rebecca Sciarra, MA CAHP Built Heritage Resources and Cultural Heritage Landscapes Heritage Planner Scarborough – Malvern Light Rail Transit Corridor Cultural Heritage Specialist: Rebecca Sciarra Transit Project Assessment Study City of Toronto, Ontario Project Administrator: Sarah Jagelewski, Hon. BA Research Archaeologist Submitted to: Report Preparation: Lindsay Popert, MA CAHP Assistant Heritage Planner IBI Group 230 Richmond Street West Graphics Preparation: Erin King, GIS Technician Toronto, ON M5V 1V6 Tel: (416) 596-1930 Lindsay Popert Fax: (416) 596-0644 Report Reviewer: Rebecca Sciarra Prepared by: Archaeological Services Inc. 528 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5S 2P9 Tel.: 416-966-1069 Fax: 416-966-9723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.iasi.to ASI File 08EA-104 March 2009 (Revised September 2009; October 2009) TABLE OF CONTENTS Cultural Heritage Assessment Report: Built Heritage Resources and Cultural Heritage Landscapes 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 Scarborough – Malvern Light Rail Transit Corridor Transit Project Assessment Study 2.0 BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE City of Toronto, Ontario LANDSCAPE CONTEXT 1 3.0 BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT 7 Archaeological Services Inc. (ASI) was contracted by IBI Group, Toronto, to conduct a built heritage and 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 17 cultural landscape assessment as part of a Transit Project Assessment for the Scarborough – Malvern Light Rail Transit (LRT) Corridor, City of Toronto, Ontario (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Scarborough Civic Centre Branch Library Project Enhancement Options
    Anne Bailey Director, Branch Libraries Toronto Public Library www.torontopubliclibrary.ca ________________________________________________________________ BRIEFING NOTE – Poverty Reduction Initiatives at Toronto Public Library _____________________________________________________________ Toronto Public Library has developed two initiatives for the City’s poverty reduction strategy in 2015, the Library Access – Fines Forgiveness program and Youth Hubs. What is the Library Access - Fine Forgiveness program? Library Access - Fine Forgiveness is a program to reinstate full library services and borrowing for children and youth at library branches in poverty areas by forgiving outstanding fines starting second quarter 2015, making summer reading programs, collections and after school programs fully accessible to the target audience. Children and youth registered at the 31 library branches and bookmobile stops delivering services to the Toronto Strong Neighbourhood Stratey (TSNS) 2020 neighbourhood improvement areas, whose library privileges are suspended, will be contacted and offered a forgiveness coupon so that full privileges are restored upon presentation of the coupon at the TSNS branch (Attachments 1 and 2). The program will be implemented in two phases. First, in spring 2015 the library will reach out to these children and teens to reinstate their privileges and invite them to join the summer reading club and participate in summer programs at their local branch. Second, in the fall as the school year gets underway, the Library will reach out again to children and teens registered at the TSNS branches with suspended cards, to reinstate their privileges and invite them back to the library. After school programs, reading support programs, collections, computer access and study spaces will be promoted. This campaign can be readily implemented and the outcomes will be tracked by branch.
    [Show full text]
  • 3101 Eglinton Avenue East Scarborough, ON
    Eglinton Avenue East Mason Road SOLD 68-Unit Apartment Building in Scarborough Village 3101 Eglinton Avenue East Scarborough, ON Well-maintained 6-storey, elevator-serviced apartment building 68 units in Scarborough Village Steps to Eglinton GO Station For more information and to discuss pricing please contact The Multi-Residential Group: David Lieberman†, MBA Jonathan Hittner* Principal Vice President 416.673.4013 416.436.4417 [email protected] [email protected] Neil Musselwhite† Senior Associate 289.795.4430 [email protected] Investment Highlights • 68 spacious units in well-maintained six-storey rental apartment building. The Avison Young • Located in family-friendly neighbourhood Multi-Residential Group with close proximity to Eglinton GO Approach Station, Scarborough Bluffs and Toronto’s East-end waterfront parks. Thorough due diligence process Best-in-class marketing materials Professional aerial photographs HWY 401 SCARBOROUGH Maximum exposure Face-to-face negotiation Accurate valuation forecast WEXFORD Local and international representation DON MILLS EGLINTON EAST DVP Our Services Apartment Apartment Kingston Road Building Sales Consultation Land Residential Development Development DANFORTH Sales Services VILLAGE THE BEACHES Opinion Rental LAKE of Value Rate ONTARIO Presentations Survey Lake Shore Blvd E For more information and to discuss pricing please contact The Multi-Residential Group: David Lieberman†, MBA Jonathan Hittner* Neil Musselwhite† Principal Vice President Senior Associate 416.673.4013 416.436.4417 289.795.4430 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] avisonyoung.com Avison Young Commercial Real Estate (Ontario) Inc., Brokerage 18 York Street, Suite 400, Toronto, ON M5J 2T8 T: 416.955.0000 F: 416.955.0724 *Broker † Sales Representative .
    [Show full text]
  • ANC Sketches Building a Neighbourhood Renewal Process Ruary 2007 Feb - I
    ANC Sketches Building a Neighbourhood Renewal Process ruary 2007 Feb - i - Anne Makhoul Table of Contents Preface III Introduction 1 Theory of Change 2 How change works in a neighbourhood 6 Initiatives by community 8 Spryfield (Halifax) Greystone’s Community Garden 9 Feasibility Study for a Spryfield Family and Multi-Service Centre 12 The Spryfield Business Directory 15 Scarborough Village (Toronto) Community Animators 18 Heritage Language Classes 21 Neighbourhood Women Engage with Elected Officials 24 Simpson-Ogden (Thunder Bay) Establishing a Neighbourhood Advisory Committee 27 Building Resilient Communities by Engaging Youth 30 North Central (Regina) Foundational Relationship Work 33 Bridgeview (Surrey) Bridgeview in Motion – Building a Shared Vision and Mission 36 Linking Up Community Services 39 Themes, questions and impact on the ANC Theory of Change 42 Engaging and Mobilizing 44 Collective Mission/Vision 45 Collective Action 46 Last words 47 References 48 List of Figures Figure 1: ANC Theory of Change 3 Figure 2: What Makes a Neighbourhood? 6 Figure 3: Understanding Change 7 Figure 4: Applying the ANC Theory of Change: Interventions 43 - i - - ii - Preface This paper was developed by a group of people brought together by the Action for Neighbourhood Change initiative. It presents an understanding of how change occurs in a neighbourhood which is based on previous and current community and neighbourhood revitalization efforts. The author would like to take this opportunity to thank the following individuals for their input and thoughtful comments on the construction of this paper: Pat Steenberg, Cheryl Gorman, Susan Taylor-Simpson, Louise Kearney, Sherri Torjman, Mark Cabaj and Rachel Chaiton.
    [Show full text]
  • The People of Scarborough
    ~THE SCARf>OROUGH PuBLIC LIBF{\RY I BOARP THE PEOPLE OF SCARBOROUGH Map of Scarborough ,.; .; .,; ::. .,; .,; .,; "'""- :;, -< "" -< "" "" 'ti "" "" S.teele~ Ave. V IV Finch Avenue III Sileppail.d Ave. 11 D St. REFERENCE POINTS 1. Thomson Park Z. Bluffer's Park J 3. civic Centre 4. Kennedy Subway 5. Metro Zoo Ikml 6. Guild Inn 1 mile! Map of Scarborough courtesy of Rick Schofield, Heritage Scarborough THE PEOPLE OF SCARBOROUGH The City of Scarborough Public Library Board Copyright© The City of Scarborough Public Library Board 1997 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, by photocopying, recording or otherwise for purposes of resale. Published by The City of Scarborough Public Library Board Grenville Printing 25 Scarsdale Rd. Don Mills, Ontario M3B 2R2 Raku ceramic Bicentennial Collector Plate and cover photo by Tom McMaken, 1996. Courtesy of The City of Scarborough. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Myrvold, Barbara The People of Scarborough: a history Includes index. ISBN 0-9683086-0-0 1. Scarborough (Ont.) - History. I. Fahey, Curtis, 1951- . II Scarborough Public Library Board. III. Title. FC3099.S33M97 1997 971.3'541 C97-932612-5 F1059.5.T686S35 1997 iv Greetings from the Mayor As Mayor of the City of Scarborough, and on behalf of Members of Council, I am pleased that The People of Scarborough: A History, has been produced. This book provides a chronological overview of the many diverse peoples and cultures that have contributed to the city's economic, cultural and social fabric.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Surveillance Indicators: Diabetes
    HEALTH SURVEILLANCE INDICATORS: DIABETES Public Health Relevance Diabetes is a disease characterized by high blood sugar, either because the body does not produce enough insulin or because the cells do not respond to the insulin that is produced. Insulin allows sugar to be moved out of the blood and into storage in the muscles, liver, and fat. Diabetes can lead to serious complications such as blindness, kidney failure, stroke and heart disease. It can also cause premature death. Among adults aged 20 years and older, mortality rates of individuals with diabetes are twice as high as those for individuals without diabetes. There are two types of diabetes. Type 2 diabetes, previously known as adult-onset diabetes, has many modifiable risk factors, including carrying excess fat, particularly around the waist, and physical inactivity. Diets high in sugar and fat or low in vegetables and fruit also increase the risk of Type 2 diabetes. Type 1 diabetes, also known as juvenile diabetes or insulin dependent diabetes, is generally developed in childhood and is not caused by the same risk factors as Type 2. The data reported here include Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. The International Diabetes Federation states that over 90% of all diabetes cases are Type 2. Highlights. 1. Diabetes prevalence in Toronto increased from 2003 to 2014. The incidence remained stable over this same time period. 2. Diabetes prevalence and incidence in Toronto were lower than in the rest of the Greater Toronto Area but higher than the rest of Ontario. 3. York South Humber, Toronto Centre, Danforth East York, and Willowdale Don Mills had lower diabetes prevalence and incidence than Toronto as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Mapping
    COMMUNITY MAPPING COMMUNITY PROFILE Kingston-Galloway-Orton Park 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary . 1 Methodology . 1 SECTION A: 2016 Statistics Canada – Custom Neighborhood Profile . 2 SECTION B: Main Organizations in KGO . 4 SECTION C: Resident Lead Initiatives in KGO . 6 SECTION D: Networks in KGO . 8 SECTION E: Itinerant KGO Programs and Services . 10 SECTION F: Community Consultation Summaries . 14 APPENDIX A: Survey Questions . 18 APPENDIX B: Space Audit . 20 APPENDIX C: Kingston Galloway Orton Park Sports and Recreation Resource guide . 27 APPENDIX D: Languages - Census Tracts and Ranks . 43 APPENDIX E: History of Kingston-Galloway/Orton Park Boundaries . 44. Executive summary This report is designed to capture a snapshot of the people and organizations in the East Scarborough community of Kingston Galloway/Orton Park (KGO), what they perceive to be the community’s strengths and deficits and the plans and strategies they are focusing on in early 2018. The data was gathered from a variety of sources, including census data, surveys and summaries from recent consultations and local research. The following is a summary of the information found in the body of this report: KGO strengths: Focus of efforts underway to improve how the • Resident leadership community players work together: • Networked organizations • Increasing organizational capacity to provide timely and appropriate resources and service • Focus on youth • Finding ways to be guided by resident voice and to • Facilitated learning, sharing, communication and honour
    [Show full text]
  • Scarborough Transportation Corridor Land Use Study - Scarborough Village Community – Final Report
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Phase 4: Scarborough Transportation Corridor Land Use Study - Scarborough Village Community – Final Report Date: April 24, 2013 To: Scarborough Community Council From: Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District Wards: Ward 36 – Scarborough Southwest Reference 13 133943 ESC 36 TM Number: SUMMARY This report summarizes the findings and presents the conclusions of the Phase 4: Scarborough Transportation Corridor Land Use Study - Scarborough Village. The report concludes that the existing land use designations and zoning standards for both City- owned and privately-owned lands within the Corridor are appropriate to regulate land use. RECOMMENDATIONS The City Planning Division recommends that: 1. City Council confirm that the existing Official Plan designations and Zoning By-law regulations for the Phase 4: Scarborough Transportation Corridor lands are appropriate. Staff report for action – Final Report – Phase 4: Scarborough Transportation Corridor Land Use Study 1 V.03/12 Financial Impact The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. ISSUE BACKGROUND History of the Scarborough Transportation Corridor (STC) Land Use Study The former Scarborough Transportation Corridor (referred to as the 'STC') consists of lands south of the Metrolinx railway (formerly CN railway) through Scarborough that were intended to provide an extension of the Gardiner Expressway to connect to Highway 401 in the east. The lands were formerly designated a 'Special Study Area' in the Scarborough Official Plan in the mid 1980's after Council, for the former City of Scarborough, determined they were not needed for transportation purposes. The STC lands (see Attachment 1: STC Phases) have been studied in segments since 1996. Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3 and the Centre Street study have all been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX E Terrestrial Archaeology Stage 1 Report
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPENDIX E Terrestrial Archaeology Stage 1 Report DRAFT SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT PROJECT – Toronto and Region Conservation ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT (STAGE 1) IN THE CITY OF TORONTO SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT PROJECT LOTS 18 TO 27 CONCESSION B, LOTS11 TO 23 CONCESSION C, AND LOTS 3 TO 17 CONCESSION D HISTORIC SCARBOROUGH TOWNSHIP, YORK COUNTY WF-14-005 PIF P338-0101-2014 ORIGINAL REPORT JUNE 30, 2015 Archaeology Resource Management Services 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, ON M3N 1S4 trca.on.ca/archaeology Archaeology Resource Management Services MTCS Licence Issued to: 5 Shoreham Drive Janice Teichroeb (P338) Downsview, ON M3N 1S4 (416) 661-6600 ext. 6406 trca.on.ca/archaeology [email protected] trca archaeology resource management services (stage 1) scarborough waterfront project Executive Summary A Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment was triggered by the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act for the Scarborough Waterfront Project in the City of Toronto. This Environmental Assessment (EA) is being conducted by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and is aimed at creating a new waterfront park along the Lake Ontario shoreline from Bluffers Park to East Point Park in the City of Toronto. The goal is to create a destination park featuring a system of linked scenic landscapes both along the top of the bluffs and at the water’s edge integrating shoreline regeneration, public access and safety, and natural heritage. The study area is located on Lots 18 to 27 Concession B, Lots 11 to 23 Concession C, and Lots 3 to 17 Concession D in historic Scarborough Township, York County. The objectives of this study are to provide information about the property’s geography, history, previous archaeological fieldwork and current land conditions in order to evaluate the property’s potential to contain cultural heritage resources that might be impacted by the modifications proposed in the EA.
    [Show full text]
  • Walkability in Toronto's High-Rise
    WALKABILITY IN TORONTO’S HIGH-rise NEIGHBOURHOODS Paul M. Hess, University of Toronto Jane Farrow, Jane’s Walk 2010 Final Report BLANK PAGE CONTENTS Walkability in Toronto’s High-rise Neighbourhoods – Final Report By Paul M. Hess and Jane Farrow Photo Editor: Katherine Childs Report Design and Layout, Supplementary Research and Editing: Mia Hunt Supplementary Research and Mapping: Jordan Hale Photography: Jane Farrow, Paul Hess and Katherine Childs Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Acknowledgements................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Study Background and Objectives................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Methods.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Study Population Demographics.................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Study Area Snapshots............................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]