Caractérisation De Nouveaux Gènes Et Polymorphismes Potentiellement Impliqués Dans Les Interactions Hôtes-Pathogènes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Caractérisation De Nouveaux Gènes Et Polymorphismes Potentiellement Impliqués Dans Les Interactions Hôtes-Pathogènes Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine de Marseille Ecole Doctorale des Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé THÈSE DE DOCTORAT Présentée par Charbel ABOU-KHATER Date et lieu de naissance: 08-Juilllet-1990, Zahlé, LIBAN En vue de l’obtention du grade de Docteur de l’Université d’Aix-Marseille Mention: Biologie, Spécialité: Microbiologie Caractérisation de nouveaux gènes et polymorphismes potentiellement impliqués dans les interactions hôtes-pathogènes Publiquement soutenue le 5 Juillet 2017 devant le jury composé de : Pr. Daniel OLIVE Directeur de Thèse Pr. Brigitte CROUAU-ROY Rapporteur Dr. Benoît FAVIER Rapporteur Dr. Pierre PONTAROTTI Examinateur Thèse codirigée par Pr. Daniel OLIVE et Dr Laurent ABI-RACHED Laboratoires d’accueil URMITE Research Unit on Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases, UMR 6236, Faculty of Medicine, 27, Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille, France CRCM, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille,Inserm 1068, 27 Boulevard Leï Roure, BP 30059, 13273 Marseille Cedex 09, France 2 Acknowledgements First and foremost, praises and thanks to God, Holy Mighty, Holy Immortal, All-Holy Trinity, for His showers of blessings throughout my whole life and to whom I owe my very existence. Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit: now and ever and unto ages of ages. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisors Prof. Daniel Olive and Dr. Laurent Abi-Rached, for the continuous support, for their patience, motivation, and immense knowledge. Someday, I hope to be just like you. A special thanks to my “Godfather” who perfectly fulfilled his role, Dr. Pierre Pontarotti for his continuous daily support. Dr. Pontarotti was always there to listen and to give advice. He showed me different ways in research problem and the need to be persistent to accomplish any goal. I want to thanks Prof. Didier Raoult and Mediterranean Infection for the funding and making my PhD experience productive and stimulating. I am heartily thankful to Marie-Hélène, for being an excellent “mother substitute” during all these years. Without her encouragement and constant support I could not have finished this work. I would also like to thank all of my Indian friends in the lab: Vivek, Vikas, Jai, Dhamo, Sourabh, Arup, Sweta for all their support in all situations. You were such great ambassadors of your beloved mother India. I thank my other fellow lab mates in both EBM and CRCM labs for the stimulating discussions, motivation and laughs during all these years. Special thanks to Sandrine, Marine, Olivier, Julien, Hassnae, Louis! Thanks for all your encouragement! I would like to thank my Lebanese friends and compatriots for accepting nothing less than excellence from me. I am also grateful to my family: Randa, Jean, Hoda, Chantal & Chris, because I owe it all to you. Many Thanks especially for your love, prayers and encouragement! Last but not the least, I would like to thank Carole, for supporting me throughout all these days... Distance never separates two hearts that really care! Thanks for your presence, your love and your ongoing prayers… Thank you for your patience on my moody days. Thank you for being my number one! I love you! Charbel 3 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ 7 Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 9 I- Genetic susceptibility to infectious diseases ............................................................................. 10 1- Host-pathogen relationships after the Neolithic Revolution .................................................... 10 2- The host-pathogen co-evolution ............................................................................................... 11 3- Pathogens adapt to their host ................................................................................................... 12 4- Factors involved in host-pathogen interactions ........................................................................ 13 5- Resistance and susceptibility to infectious diseases ................................................................. 14 6- Genetic basis of infectious disease susceptibility in humans .................................................... 15 7- Twin studies demonstrate the importance of host genetic factors .......................................... 16 8- Examples of genetic susceptibilities to human infectious diseases .......................................... 17 9- Host adaptation, signatures of selection................................................................................... 19 II- Human genetic variations .......................................................................................................... 21 1- Major categories of human genetic variation ....................................................................... 21 - Structural rearrangements .................................................................................................... 21 - Insertion and deletion events ............................................................................................... 21 - Copy number variation .......................................................................................................... 22 - Transposons and retrotransposons ....................................................................................... 22 - Single-base-pair changes ....................................................................................................... 22 2- NGS data: continuously improving technologies .................................................................. 23 III- Features of immunity genes .................................................................................................. 27 IV- HLA, the extraordinary level of diversity ............................................................................... 28 Main objective ....................................................................................................................................... 31 Chapter 2: Materials and Methods ....................................................................................................... 32 1- Pipeline description ............................................................................................................... 33 Standard analysis ........................................................................................................................... 33 High sensitivity analysis ................................................................................................................. 34 Genotype verification .................................................................................................................... 34 Allele reconstructions .................................................................................................................... 34 2- Allotypes nomenclature ........................................................................................................ 35 4 3- Data sources .......................................................................................................................... 38 Chapter 3: Investigating the correlation between the SNP CT60 and coding variations in the CD28/CTLA4/ICOS gene region .............................................................................................................. 40 I- Investigating the diversity of these immunomodulatory genes in a set of individuals representing different populations ................................................................................................... 42 II- Investigating the coding diversity of 3 immunomodulatory genes (CD28, CTLA4, ICOS) in a set of individuals representing different populations............................................................................. 43 1- Material and methods ............................................................................................................... 43 2- Results ....................................................................................................................................... 44 III- Correlation between SNPs found in the coding regions of these genes and the SNP CT60 . 48 IV- Annex ..................................................................................................................................... 51 Chapter 4: Polymorphism and functional analysis of some immune genes controlling infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis ................................................................................................................. 56 I- Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 57 II- Materials and methods ............................................................................................................. 58 III- RESULTS ................................................................................................................................. 59 1- TLR2 and Vitamin D pathway .................................................................................................... 59 Investigating the coding diversity of VDR and TLR2 in a set of individuals representing different populations .......................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Human and Mouse CD Marker Handbook Human and Mouse CD Marker Key Markers - Human Key Markers - Mouse
    Welcome to More Choice CD Marker Handbook For more information, please visit: Human bdbiosciences.com/eu/go/humancdmarkers Mouse bdbiosciences.com/eu/go/mousecdmarkers Human and Mouse CD Marker Handbook Human and Mouse CD Marker Key Markers - Human Key Markers - Mouse CD3 CD3 CD (cluster of differentiation) molecules are cell surface markers T Cell CD4 CD4 useful for the identification and characterization of leukocytes. The CD CD8 CD8 nomenclature was developed and is maintained through the HLDA (Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens) workshop started in 1982. CD45R/B220 CD19 CD19 The goal is to provide standardization of monoclonal antibodies to B Cell CD20 CD22 (B cell activation marker) human antigens across laboratories. To characterize or “workshop” the antibodies, multiple laboratories carry out blind analyses of antibodies. These results independently validate antibody specificity. CD11c CD11c Dendritic Cell CD123 CD123 While the CD nomenclature has been developed for use with human antigens, it is applied to corresponding mouse antigens as well as antigens from other species. However, the mouse and other species NK Cell CD56 CD335 (NKp46) antibodies are not tested by HLDA. Human CD markers were reviewed by the HLDA. New CD markers Stem Cell/ CD34 CD34 were established at the HLDA9 meeting held in Barcelona in 2010. For Precursor hematopoetic stem cell only hematopoetic stem cell only additional information and CD markers please visit www.hcdm.org. Macrophage/ CD14 CD11b/ Mac-1 Monocyte CD33 Ly-71 (F4/80) CD66b Granulocyte CD66b Gr-1/Ly6G Ly6C CD41 CD41 CD61 (Integrin b3) CD61 Platelet CD9 CD62 CD62P (activated platelets) CD235a CD235a Erythrocyte Ter-119 CD146 MECA-32 CD106 CD146 Endothelial Cell CD31 CD62E (activated endothelial cells) Epithelial Cell CD236 CD326 (EPCAM1) For Research Use Only.
    [Show full text]
  • RT² Profiler PCR Array (384-Well Format) Human Apoptosis 384HT
    RT² Profiler PCR Array (384-Well Format) Human Apoptosis 384HT Cat. no. 330231 PAHS-3012ZE For pathway expression analysis Format For use with the following real-time cyclers RT² Profiler PCR Array, Applied Biosystems® models 7900HT (384-well block), Format E ViiA™ 7 (384-well block); Bio-Rad CFX384™ RT² Profiler PCR Array, Roche® LightCycler® 480 (384-well block) Format G Description The Human Apoptosis RT² Profiler PCR Array profiles the expression of 370 key genes involved in apoptosis, or programmed cell death. The array includes the TNF ligands and their receptors; members of the bcl-2 family, BIR (baculoviral IAP repeat) domain proteins, CARD domain (caspase recruitment domain) proteins, death domain proteins, TRAF (TNF receptor-associated factor) domain proteins and caspases. These 370 genes are also grouped by their functional contribution to apoptosis, either anti-apoptosis or induction of apoptosis. Using real-time PCR, you can easily and reliably analyze expression of a focused panel of genes related to apoptosis with this array. For further details, consult the RT² Profiler PCR Array Handbook. Sample & Assay Technologies Shipping and storage RT² Profiler PCR Arrays in formats E and G are shipped at ambient temperature, on dry ice, or blue ice packs depending on destination and accompanying products. For long term storage, keep plates at –20°C. Note: Ensure that you have the correct RT² Profiler PCR Array format for your real-time cycler (see table above). Note: Open the package and store the products appropriately immediately
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model
    Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on September 25, 2021 T + is online at: average * The Journal of Immunology , 34 of which you can access for free at: 2016; 197:1477-1488; Prepublished online 1 July from submission to initial decision 4 weeks from acceptance to publication 2016; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600589 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/197/4/1477 Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8 Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model Katherine A. Waugh, Sonia M. Leach, Brandon L. Moore, Tullia C. Bruno, Jonathan D. Buhrman and Jill E. Slansky J Immunol cites 95 articles Submit online. Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists ? is published twice each month by Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts http://jimmunol.org/subscription Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2016/07/01/jimmunol.160058 9.DCSupplemental This article http://www.jimmunol.org/content/197/4/1477.full#ref-list-1 Information about subscribing to The JI No Triage! Fast Publication! Rapid Reviews! 30 days* Why • • • Material References Permissions Email Alerts Subscription Supplementary The Journal of Immunology The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2016 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. This information is current as of September 25, 2021. The Journal of Immunology Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model Katherine A.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems and Chemical Biology Approaches to Study Cell Function and Response to Toxins
    Dissertation submitted to the Combined Faculties for the Natural Sciences and for Mathematics of the Ruperto-Carola University of Heidelberg, Germany for the degree of Doctor of Natural Sciences Presented by MSc. Yingying Jiang born in Shandong, China Oral-examination: Systems and chemical biology approaches to study cell function and response to toxins Referees: Prof. Dr. Rob Russell Prof. Dr. Stefan Wölfl CONTRIBUTIONS The chapter III of this thesis was submitted for publishing under the title “Drug mechanism predominates over toxicity mechanisms in drug induced gene expression” by Yingying Jiang, Tobias C. Fuchs, Kristina Erdeljan, Bojana Lazerevic, Philip Hewitt, Gordana Apic & Robert B. Russell. For chapter III, text phrases, selected tables, figures are based on this submitted manuscript that has been originally written by myself. i ABSTRACT Toxicity is one of the main causes of failure during drug discovery, and of withdrawal once drugs reached the market. Prediction of potential toxicities in the early stage of drug development has thus become of great interest to reduce such costly failures. Since toxicity results from chemical perturbation of biological systems, we combined biological and chemical strategies to help understand and ultimately predict drug toxicities. First, we proposed a systematic strategy to predict and understand the mechanistic interpretation of drug toxicities based on chemical fragments. Fragments frequently found in chemicals with certain toxicities were defined as structural alerts for use in prediction. Some of the predictions were supported with mechanistic interpretation by integrating fragment- chemical, chemical-protein, protein-protein interactions and gene expression data. Next, we systematically deciphered the mechanisms of drug actions and toxicities by analyzing the associations of drugs’ chemical features, biological features and their gene expression profiles from the TG-GATEs database.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Genes Used in Cell Type Enrichment Analysis
    List of genes used in cell type enrichment analysis Metagene Cell type Immunity ADAM28 Activated B cell Adaptive CD180 Activated B cell Adaptive CD79B Activated B cell Adaptive BLK Activated B cell Adaptive CD19 Activated B cell Adaptive MS4A1 Activated B cell Adaptive TNFRSF17 Activated B cell Adaptive IGHM Activated B cell Adaptive GNG7 Activated B cell Adaptive MICAL3 Activated B cell Adaptive SPIB Activated B cell Adaptive HLA-DOB Activated B cell Adaptive IGKC Activated B cell Adaptive PNOC Activated B cell Adaptive FCRL2 Activated B cell Adaptive BACH2 Activated B cell Adaptive CR2 Activated B cell Adaptive TCL1A Activated B cell Adaptive AKNA Activated B cell Adaptive ARHGAP25 Activated B cell Adaptive CCL21 Activated B cell Adaptive CD27 Activated B cell Adaptive CD38 Activated B cell Adaptive CLEC17A Activated B cell Adaptive CLEC9A Activated B cell Adaptive CLECL1 Activated B cell Adaptive AIM2 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive BIRC3 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive BRIP1 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive CCL20 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive CCL4 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive CCL5 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive CCNB1 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive CCR7 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive DUSP2 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive ESCO2 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive ETS1 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive EXO1 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive EXOC6 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive IARS Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive ITK Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive KIF11 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive KNTC1 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive NUF2 Activated CD4 T cell Adaptive PRC1 Activated
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Drug Targeting Mechanisms with Genetic Evidence for Parkinson’S Disease
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.24.208975; this version posted July 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Finding drug targeting mechanisms with genetic evidence for Parkinson’s disease Catherine S. Storm1,*, Demis A. Kia1, Mona Almramhi1, Sara Bandres-Ciga2, Chris Finan3, Aroon D. Hingorani3,4,5, International Parkinson’s Disease Genomics Consortium (IPDGC), Nicholas W. Wood1,6,* 1 Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom 2 Molecular Genetics Section, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States of America 3 Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom 4 University College London British Heart Foundation Research Accelerator Centre, New Delhi, India 5 Health Data Research UK, 222 Euston Road, London, United Kingdom 6 Lead Contact * Correspondence: [email protected] (CSS), [email protected] (NWW) Summary Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative movement disorder that currently has no disease-modifying treatment, partly owing to inefficiencies in drug target identification and validation using human evidence. Here, we use Mendelian randomization to investigate more than 3000 genes that encode druggable proteins, seeking to predict their efficacy as drug targets for PD. We use expression and protein quantitative trait loci for druggable genes to mimic exposure to medications, and we examine the causal effect on PD risk (in two large case-control cohorts), PD age at onset and progression.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognition and Steroidogenesis in the Rhesus Macaque
    Cognition and Steroidogenesis in the Rhesus Macaque Krystina G Sorwell A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Behavioral Neuroscience and the Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2013 School of Medicine Oregon Health & Science University CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL This is to certify that the PhD dissertation of Krystina Gerette Sorwell has been approved Henryk Urbanski Mentor/Advisor Steven Kohama Member Kathleen Grant Member Cynthia Bethea Member Deb Finn Member 1 For Lily 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Figures and Tables ............................................................................................................................................. 7 List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................... 10 Abstract........................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Part A: Central steroidogenesis and cognition ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2. Significant
    Table 2. Significant (Q < 0.05 and |d | > 0.5) transcripts from the meta-analysis Gene Chr Mb Gene Name Affy ProbeSet cDNA_IDs d HAP/LAP d HAP/LAP d d IS Average d Ztest P values Q-value Symbol ID (study #5) 1 2 STS B2m 2 122 beta-2 microglobulin 1452428_a_at AI848245 1.75334941 4 3.2 4 3.2316485 1.07398E-09 5.69E-08 Man2b1 8 84.4 mannosidase 2, alpha B1 1416340_a_at H4049B01 3.75722111 3.87309653 2.1 1.6 2.84852656 5.32443E-07 1.58E-05 1110032A03Rik 9 50.9 RIKEN cDNA 1110032A03 gene 1417211_a_at H4035E05 4 1.66015788 4 1.7 2.82772795 2.94266E-05 0.000527 NA 9 48.5 --- 1456111_at 3.43701477 1.85785922 4 2 2.8237185 9.97969E-08 3.48E-06 Scn4b 9 45.3 Sodium channel, type IV, beta 1434008_at AI844796 3.79536664 1.63774235 3.3 2.3 2.75319499 1.48057E-08 6.21E-07 polypeptide Gadd45gip1 8 84.1 RIKEN cDNA 2310040G17 gene 1417619_at 4 3.38875643 1.4 2 2.69163229 8.84279E-06 0.0001904 BC056474 15 12.1 Mus musculus cDNA clone 1424117_at H3030A06 3.95752801 2.42838452 1.9 2.2 2.62132809 1.3344E-08 5.66E-07 MGC:67360 IMAGE:6823629, complete cds NA 4 153 guanine nucleotide binding protein, 1454696_at -3.46081884 -4 -1.3 -1.6 -2.6026947 8.58458E-05 0.0012617 beta 1 Gnb1 4 153 guanine nucleotide binding protein, 1417432_a_at H3094D02 -3.13334396 -4 -1.6 -1.7 -2.5946297 1.04542E-05 0.0002202 beta 1 Gadd45gip1 8 84.1 RAD23a homolog (S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Minimal Set of Internal Control Genes for Gene Expression Studies in Head
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/108381; this version posted February 14, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 A minimal set of internal control genes for gene expression studies in head 2 and neck squamous cell carcinoma. 1 1 1 2 3 Vinayak Palve , Manisha Pareek , Neeraja M Krishnan , Gangotri Siddappa , 2 2 1,3* 4 Amritha Suresh , Moni Abraham Kuriakose and Binay Panda 5 1 6 Ganit Labs, Bio-IT Centre, Institute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology, 7 Bangalore 560100 2 8 Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Centre and Mazumdar Shaw Centre for Translational 9 Research, Bangalore 560096 3 10 Strand Life Sciences, Bangalore 560024 11 * Corresponding author: [email protected] 12 13 Abstract: 14 Background: Selection of the right reference gene(s) is crucial in the analysis and 15 interpretation of gene expression data. In head and neck cancer, studies evaluating 16 the efficacy of internal reference genes are rare. Here, we present data for a minimal 17 set of candidates as internal control genes for gene expression studies in head and 18 neck cancer. 19 Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources (in house whole-genome gene 20 expression microarrays, n=21; TCGA RNA-seq, n=42, and published gene 21 expression studies in head and neck tumors from literature) to come up with a set of 22 genes (discovery set) for their stable expression across tumor and normal tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual Annotation and Analysis of the Defensin Gene Cluster in the C57BL
    BMC Genomics BioMed Central Research article Open Access Manual annotation and analysis of the defensin gene cluster in the C57BL/6J mouse reference genome Clara Amid*†1, Linda M Rehaume*†2, Kelly L Brown2,3, James GR Gilbert1, Gordon Dougan1, Robert EW Hancock2 and Jennifer L Harrow1 Address: 1Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK, 2University of British Columbia, Centre for Microbial Disease & Immunity Research, 2259 Lower Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada and 3Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Göteborg University, Guldhedsgatan 10, S-413 46 Göteborg, Sweden Email: Clara Amid* - [email protected]; Linda M Rehaume* - [email protected]; Kelly L Brown - [email protected]; James GR Gilbert - [email protected]; Gordon Dougan - [email protected]; Robert EW Hancock - [email protected]; Jennifer L Harrow - [email protected] * Corresponding authors †Equal contributors Published: 15 December 2009 Received: 15 May 2009 Accepted: 15 December 2009 BMC Genomics 2009, 10:606 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-606 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/10/606 © 2009 Amid et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Host defense peptides are a critical component of the innate immune system. Human alpha- and beta-defensin genes are subject to copy number variation (CNV) and historically the organization of mouse alpha-defensin genes has been poorly defined.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide Association Analysis on Coronary Artery Disease in Type 1 Diabetes Suggests Beta-Defensin 127 As a Novel Risk Locus
    Genome-wide association analysis on coronary artery disease in type 1 diabetes suggests beta-defensin 127 as a novel risk locus Antikainen, A., Sandholm, N., Tregouet, D-A., Charmet, R., McKnight, A., Ahluwalia, T. V. S., Syreeni, A., Valo, E., Forsblom, C., Gordin, D., Harjutsalo, V., Hadjadj, S., Maxwell, P., Rossing, P., & Groop, P-H. (2020). Genome-wide association analysis on coronary artery disease in type 1 diabetes suggests beta-defensin 127 as a novel risk locus. Cardiovascular Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaa045 Published in: Cardiovascular Research Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2020 OUP. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:01. Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Chromosome X in Intraocular Pressure Variation and Sex-Specific Effects
    Genetics The Role of Chromosome X in Intraocular Pressure Variation and Sex-Specific Effects Mark J. Simcoe,1–3 Anthony P. Khawaja,4,5 Omar A. Mahroo,3 Christopher J. Hammond,1,2 and Pirro G. Hysi1,2; for the UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium 1Department of Ophthalmology, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom 2KCL Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, London, United Kingdom 3Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom 4NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfield’s Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom 5Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom Correspondence: Pirro G. Hysi, PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to identify genetic variants on chromosome Department of Ophthalmology, X associated with intraocular pressure (IOP) and determine if they possess any sex- Kings College London, St. Thomas specific effects. Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH UK; METHODS. Association analyses were performed across chromosome X using 102,407 [email protected]. participants from the UK Biobank. Replication and validation analyses were conducted in an additional 6599 participants from the EPIC-Norfolk cohort, and an independent Members of the UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium are listed in 331,682 participants from the UK Biobank. the Supplementary Material. RESULTS. We identified three loci associated with IOP at genomewide significance (P < 5 × 10−8), located within or near the following genes: MXRA5 (rs2107482, Received: June 19, 2020 − − Accepted: August 19, 2020 P = 7.1 × 10 11), GPM6B (rs66819623, P = 6.9 × 10 10), NDP,andEFHC2 (rs12558081, − Published: September 14, 2020 P = 4.9 × 10 11).
    [Show full text]