July 16, 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Metaphorical Devices in Political Cartoons with Reference to Political Confrontation in Pakistan After Panama Leaks
Metaphorical Devices in Political cartoons with Reference to Political Confrontation in Pakistan after Panama Leaks Ayesha Ashfaq Savera Shami Sana Naveed Khan It has been assumed that metaphorical and symbolic contests are waged with metaphors, captions and signs in political cartoons that play a significant role in image construction of political actors, situations or events in political arena. This paper is an effort to explore the metaphorical devices in political cartoons related to the political confrontation in Pakistan between the ruling party Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PMLN) and opposition parties especially after Panama leaks. For this purpose, political cartoons sketched by three renowned political cartoonists on the basis of their belongings to the highest circulated mainstream English newspapers of Pakistan and their extensive professional experiences in their genre, were selectedfrom April 2016 to July 29, 2017 (Period of Panama trail). The cartoons were analyzed through the Barthes’s model of Semiotics. It was observed that metaphorical devices in political cartoons are one of the key weapons of cartoonists’ armory. These devices are used to attack on the candidates and contribute to the image and character building. It was found that all the selected political cartoonists used different forms of metaphors including situational metaphors and embodying metaphors. Not only the physical stature but also the debates and their activities were depicted metaphorically in the cartoons that create the scenario of comparison between the cartoons and their real political confrontation. It was examined that both forms of metaphors shed light on cartoonist’s perception and newspaper’s policy about political candidates, political parties and particular events. -
The Colour Khaki
tariq ali THE COLOUR KHAKI Now each day is fair and balmy, Everywhere you look: the army. Ustad Daman (1959) n 19 September 2001, General Pervaiz Musharraf went on TV to inform the people of Pakistan that their country Owould be standing shoulder to shoulder with the United States in its bombardment of Afghanistan. Visibly pale, blinking and sweating, he looked like a man who had just signed his own death warrant. The installation of the Taliban regime in Kabul had been the Pakistan Army’s only foreign-policy success. In 1978, the US had famously turned to the country’s military dictator General Zia-ul- Haq when it needed a proxy to manage its jihad against the radical pro-Soviet regime in Afghanistan. In what followed, the Pakistan Inter- Services Intelligence became an army within an army, with much of its budget supplied directly from Washington. It was the ISI that super- vised the Taliban’s sweep to power during Benazir Bhutto’s premiership of the mid-nineties; that controlled the infiltration of skilled saboteurs and assassins into Indian-held Kashmir; and that maintained a direct connexion with Osama bin Laden. Zia’s successors could congratulate themselves that their new province in the north-west almost made up for the defection of Bangladesh in 1971. Now it was time to unravel the gains of the victory: the Taliban pro- tectorate had to be dismantled and bin Laden captured, ‘dead or alive’. But having played such a frontline role in installing fundamentalism in Afghanistan, would the Pakistan Army and the ISI accept the reverse command from their foreign masters, and put themselves in the fore- front of the brutal attempt to root it out? Musharraf was clearly nervous new left review 19 jan feb 2003 5 6 nlr 19 but the US Defence Intelligence Agency had not erred. -
Unit 19. Panama Papers- Case of Tax Evasion by the Rich
GAUTAM SINGH UPSC STUDY MATERIAL – International Relation 0 7830294949 Unit 19. Panama Papers- Case of Tax Evasion by the Rich The Panama Papers are documents which were leaked from Mossack Fonseca, a Panama-based law firm offering legal and trust services. It is alleged that many of these documents show how wealthy individuals – including public officials – hide their money from public scrutiny. Panama Papers: What is it? It is a set of 11.5 million documents that were leaked from a Panama-based corporate service provider Mossack Fonseca. (Note: Panama is a Central American country). It is considered as the biggest leak in the history, even bigger than the WikiLeaks and the Snowden leaks. The documents contain detailed information (including those of shareholders and directors, and even passport information!) about more than 2.14 lakh offshore companies listed by the agency. It is alleged that the agency facilitated the rich and influential people to hide their wealth from public scrutiny, and thus evade taxation in their domestic domains. The alleged perpetrators vary from current government leaders to public officials to close associates of various heads of the governments etc. The leak consists of data created between 1970s and late 2015. The data primarily comprises e-mails, PDF files, photos, and excerpts of an internal Mossack Fonseca database, covering a period from the 1970s to 2016. The Panama Papers leak provides data on some 214,000 companies with a folder for each shell firm that contains e-mails, contracts, transcripts, and scanned documents. The leak comprised over 4.8 million emails, 3 million database format files, 2.2 million PDFs, 1.2 million images, 320 thousand text files, and 2242 files in other formats. -
Malta 2016 Human Rights Report
MALTA 2016 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Malta is a constitutional republic and parliamentary democracy. The president is the head of state, appointed by a resolution of the unicameral parliament (House of Representatives. Parliament appointed a new president in 2014. The president names as prime minister the leader of the party winning a majority of seats in parliamentary elections. The 2013 general elections were deemed free and fair. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over security forces. Lengthy delays in the judicial system, inadequate government programs for integrating migrants, and alleged corruption at senior government levels compounded by a lack of government transparency were the most significant human rights problems. Other problems included violence against women, trafficking in persons, societal racial discrimination, forced labor, and substandard work conditions for irregular migrants. The government took steps to investigate, prosecute, and punish officials who committed violations, whether in security services or elsewhere in the government. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary Deprivation of Life and other Unlawful or Politically Motivated Killings There were no reports that the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. b. Disappearance There were no reports of politically motivated disappearances. c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment The constitution and law prohibit such practices. MALTA 2 Prison and Detention Center Conditions While there were no significant reports regarding prison or detention center conditions that raised general human rights concerns, poor conditions in detention centers for certain irregular migrants persisted. Physical Conditions: On October 25, the Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) released a report on its September 2015 visit to the country. -
Pld 2017 Sc 70)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: Mr. Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa Mr. Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan Mr. Justice Gulzar Ahmed Mr. Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed Mr. Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan Constitution Petition No. 29 of 2016 (Panama Papers Scandal) Imran Ahmad Khan Niazi Petitioner versus Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, Prime Minister of Pakistan / Member National Assembly, Prime Minister’s House, Islamabad and nine others Respondents For the petitioner: Syed Naeem Bokhari, ASC Mr. Sikandar Bashir Mohmad, ASC Mr. Fawad Hussain Ch., ASC Mr. Faisal Fareed Hussain, ASC Ch. Akhtar Ali, AOR with the petitioner in person Assisted by: Mr. Yousaf Anjum, Advocate Mr. Kashif Siddiqui, Advocate Mr. Imad Khan, Advocate Mr. Akbar Hussain, Advocate Barrister Maleeka Bokhari, Advocate Ms. Iman Shahid, Advocate, For respondent No. 1: Mr. Makhdoom Ali Khan, Sr. ASC Mr. Khurram M. Hashmi, ASC Mr. Feisal Naqvi, ASC Assisted by: Mr. Saad Hashmi, Advocate Mr. Sarmad Hani, Advocate Mr. Mustafa Mirza, Advocate For the National Mr. Qamar Zaman Chaudhry, Accountability Bureau Chairman, National Accountability (respondent No. 2): Bureau in person Mr. Waqas Qadeer Dar, Prosecutor- Constitution Petition No. 29 of 2016, 2 Constitution Petition No. 30 of 2016 & Constitution Petition No. 03 of 2017 General Accountability Mr. Arshad Qayyum, Special Prosecutor Accountability Syed Ali Imran, Special Prosecutor Accountability Mr. Farid-ul-Hasan Ch., Special Prosecutor Accountability For the Federation of Mr. Ashtar Ausaf Ali, Attorney-General Pakistan for Pakistan (respondents No. 3 & Mr. Nayyar Abbas Rizvi, Additional 4): Attorney-General for Pakistan Mr. Gulfam Hameed, Deputy Solicitor, Ministry of Law & Justice Assisted by: Barrister Asad Rahim Khan Mr. -
Five Policemen, Private Security Guards Killed in Kulgam Attack
K K M M , - Y Y C C $(+#(&)'' )"!'!(($ &)"%'#*$+$(#$"'' ($"( +(&& %(' &%&'#($$(!!$& '"'#'$$&' "!+ &#'%#)'' nation, 7P sports, 9P world, 8P DAILY Price 2.00 Pages : 12 JAMMU TUESDAY | MAY 02 2017 | VOL. 32 | NO. 120 | REGD. NO. : JM/JK 118/15 /17 | E-mail : [email protected] | epaper.glimpsesoffuture.com 111"'$(+- -*!!/./, *( Five policemen, private security guards killed in Kulgam attack Pak forces behead two Indian security men after crossing LoC ,$)",2 Meanwhile, a bank official told that no bank official was Five policemen and two killed in the attack. He said CM strongly private security guards were that the security guards, who Monday killed when militants were killed in the attack was condemns killing opened fire upon a vehicle of working for a private security of police personnel, JK Bank in Pombai area in company. He added that van Kulgam district. The militants was coming back from DH bank officials also decamped with the serv- Pora towards Kulgam town ice rifles of the slain cops, po- after depositing cash in local lice said. The militants cam- bank branches there. The in- Chief Minister, ouflaged in forces uniform cident created chaos in the Mehbooba Mufti has stopped the cash van of JK village. All the shops and oth- strongly condemned the Bank and fired indiscrimi- er business establishments killing of five police per- nately upon the vehicle. were closed in the village fol- sonnel and two bank offi- Following the attack, mili- lowing the incident. cials of a cash van who tants decamped with their Meanwhile, JK Bank were killed today by un- services rifles, the police offi- Chairman and CEO Parvez ((/2 known assailants at cial said. -
Through the Critical Lenses of Cartoonists-Analysis of Political Cartoons
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH Vol. VIII, Issue 3/ June 2020 Impact Factor: 3.4546 (UIF) ISSN 2286-4822 DRJI Value: 5.9 (B+) www.euacademic.org History of Pakistanis’ Power Politics-from 1947 to 2020- through the Critical Lenses of Cartoonists- Analysis of Political Cartoons SHAZIA AKBAR GHILZAI Faculty Member, Department of Linguistics, QAU PhD Student, USPC Paris13, Research Lab TTN Paris 13 Abstract Political cartoons have the power to elicit a variety of responses because cartoon artists craft their work to express political views that are often controversial. We can say that political cartoons resemble time capsules. They provide information to the viewers about the time of their creation. Since, they denote particular events, they may seem to be locked in a given age. The article shows how the cartoons of a specific period represent the time and period in which they are produced. It reveals the function of cartoons beyond just humor or politics; cartoons not only record the history, the historical events and situations; but also provide critical lenses to view them simultaneously. It is indeed a very unique way for the creation, evaluation and maintenance of history and historical records. The present study reveals the history of Pakistanis’ power politics from 1947 to 2020 preserved through the medium of cartoons. The cartoonists evaluate and record particular events, situations and circumstances existing at one moment of time. The artists preserve the whole anecdote along with the context in a single frame uniquely. The editorial or political cartoons are based on topics of national interest; therefore, the present study recommends the preservation of cartoons systematically as National Archives1. -
The Removal of Nawaz Sharif and Changing Role of Punjab in Pakistani Politics
December 2014 15 August 2017 The Removal of Nawaz Sharif and Changing Role of Punjab in Pakistani Politics Tridivesh Singh Maini FDI Associate Key Points The removal from office of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif could be the precedent for a change of approach towards the civil-military relationship on the part of the influential province of Punjab. The most populous province of Pakistan, Punjab has long dominated the Pakistani polity and military. Sharif’s party, the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz), heads both the Punjab provincial government and the national government. If the PML-N decides to continue Sharif’s attempts at better relations with India, it will again place the government at odds with the army, which wants oversight of foreign policy issues pertaining to Afghanistan and India. If the PML-N is interested in improving links with India, it will need to take action against terrorist groups. Summary The most populous province of Pakistan, Punjab has long dominated the Pakistani polity and military. Initially, at least, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif – a Punjabi – enjoyed a close relationship with the army. That relationship soured, however, following his dismissal from office during his first term as Prime Minister in 1993. A key factor for the falling out between Sharif and the army was the former’s attempts to build a better relationship with India. Arguably, that enmity only increased during Sharif’s third, most recent, term in office. In the wake of Sharif’s disqualification on 28 July 2017, the influential, traditionally pro-army Punjab leadership is now instead backing Sharif’s party, the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz), or PML-N. -
The Sharif Verdict
8/7/2017 The Sharif Verdict The Sharif Verdict Suba Chandran Pakistan is trying to digest the Supreme Court ruling on disqualifying Nawaz Sharif as the Prime Minister. So is PML-N – trying to cope up with the situation and looking at alternatives. While Imran Khan is jubilant, other opposition political parties are guarded in their response. A section within Pakistan feels that this judgement – disqualifying a sitting Prime Minister (though some talk in terms of a “judicial coup”) as a new great beginning for the judiciary and accountability for Pakistan; this section also expects the Supreme Court to continue and expand further. And the elephant in the room- the military has been quiet. What next? What would be individual Endgames for these actors? And where would these individual Endgames collectively take Pakistan into? PML-N: Getting ready for the transition. Or, will it transform? The PML-N has been extremely critical of the entire process led Joint Investigation Team; many within the party questioned the motivations of the JIT. A section even accused of conspiracy by some members of the JIT in misleading the process, and in the process projecting the entire Sharif family in a bad light. And there is an element of truth in the above perception. However, Nawaz Sharif has accepted the Supreme Court’s verdict and has decided to immediately step down. A care taker Prime Minister has been already chosen. It is widely expected that Shabaz Sharif, Nawaz’s younger brother and currently the Chief Minister of Punjab province will resign and contest for the National Assembly, and subsequently get appointed as the Prime Minister. -
A Study of Pakistan's Political Parties' Control Over State Resources and Redistribution in the Light of Panama Papers
International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 6 No. 12 December 2018 A Study of Pakistan’s Political Parties’ Control Over State Resources and Redistribution in the Light of Panama Papers Spozmi TOOR Istanbul Aydin University Abstract The aim of the paper is to analyze and summarize the existing theoretical and secondary work on corruption in Pakistan. Two of the major political parties’ (PMLN and PPP) tenures will be discussed as they have ruled the country for about 30 years. Additionally, their control over the resources will be highlighted and how they have paved ways for corruption in every institution. The paper begins with a brief over-view of conceptualization of Corruption. This is followed by the major corruption leaks known as ‘Panama Papers’ which caused a bustle in Pakistani politics as one of the prominent political parties’ (PMLN) head and his family was named in those leaks that how they have been over the years money laundering to buy hidden off shore companies. The paper also addresses the important aspect of corruption and improper allocation of country’s resources with regards to the most powerful political parties of Pakistan PPP and PMLN. It discusses the most important factors of corruption with regards to the parties’ exercise within the parliament, election campaign, and overall control of the party over the resources of the country and its redistribution. Keywords: Corruption, Panama leaks, Pakistan, Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz Party, Pakistan people’s party, State 227 ISSN: 2411-5681 www.ijern.com Introduction The topic of my paper is “Pakistan Political Parties’ Control over State Resources and Redistribution in the Light of Panama Papers”. -
Jenni Russel Greater Turmoil Is Expected
SUCCESS IS A LOUSY TEACH- QUOTE ER. IT SEDUCES SMART OF THE PEOPLE INTO THINKING THEY DAY CAN’T LOSE. Thursday, July 12, 2018 BILL GATES Johnson JENNI RUSSELL or the second time in three years, Boris Johnson, a politician whose ambition and Fsuperficial charm far outstrip his ability, judgment or principles, is destabilising the British has government and threatening the country’s future. On July 9, Johnson, in protest against Prime Minister Theresa May’s plans for Brexit, resigned from his post as foreign secretary. Now May’s authority, longevity and ability to deliver a Brexit without causing an economic crisis are in question. But further political paralysis seems certain. ruined Britain is in this mess principally because the Brexiteers — led largely by Johnson — sold the country a series of lies in the lead up to the June 2016 referendum on leaving the European Union. They did so because neither Johnson nor his fel- low leader of the “leave” campaign, Michael Gove, intended, wanted or expected to win. Britain At the start of 2016, Johnson was perhaps the most popular politician in Britain. Supporters and fans mobbed him at train stations and traffic lights; pollsters and pundits thought he could reach the parts of the country that other Conservatives could never touch. But he was also driven and insecure, ‘He knows that the verdict of so desperate to guarantee he would be the next prime minister that he cynically abandoned his history is about to come down on own previous positions on the European Union him - and bury him’ in order to try to secure support from his party’s Euroskeptic right wing. -
Sharif Names Brother
20 Sunday, July 30, 2017 Islamabad akistan’s ousted prime minister Nawaz Sharif named his brother Shahbaz, the chief minister of Punjab province, Former Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif asP his successor and nominated ex-oil minister Shahid (R) with his brother Shahbaz Sharif during a Khaqan Abbasi as an interim premier in a defiant speech press conference in Lahore (file photo) yesterday. The announcement charts a way forward for Pakistan after the Supreme Court ousted Sharif Friday following an investigation into corruption allegations against him and his family, bringing to an unceremonious end his historic third term in power and briefly plunging the country into political uncertainty. “I support Shahbaz Sharif after me but he will take time to contest elections so for the time being I nominate Shahid Khaqan Abbasi,” Sharif said in a televised speech to his party. The younger Sharif holds only a provincial seat, so must be elected to the national assembly before becoming the new prime minister. Earlier Saturday the Election Commission of Pakistan confirmed fresh elections would be held in Nawaz Sharif’s former constituency. Abbasi is set to be rubber-stamped as placeholder in a parliamentary vote, with Sharif’s ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz commanding a majority in the 342-seat house. The opposition could also field a candidate for the premiership, though the nominee has little chance of getting sufficient votes. Nawaz Sharif became the 15th prime minister in Pakistan’s 70-year history -- roughly half of which was under military rule -- to be ousted before completing a full term.