DOCSLIB.ORG

The End of the Oprichnina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

396 Chapter 16 Chapter 16 The End of the Oprichnina In resuming the struggle for Livonia, the Russian government counted on an alliance with one of the greatest maritime powers – England. The English queen, however, rejected the draft treaty accepted by her envoy in Vologda and confined herself to vague promises regarding friendly ties. The queen’s council sent a secret communiqué to Moscow promising Ivan and his family asylum if he was overtaken by some unfortunate occurrence, conspiracy, or external hostility. The autocrat’s pride was wounded. The tsar categorically insisted on the conclusion of an agreement with the queen that each would provide the other with refuge in the event of need. The clear response from London, how- ever, was that Elizabeth had no intention of leaving her country. The failure of plans for an Anglo-Russian alliance and dissatisfaction over the secret agree- ment prompted Ivan to immediately annul the privileges granted to the Eng- lish Muscovy Company and to confiscate part of its goods. In a letter to the queen on 24 October 1570, the tsar wrote: “Our business has not been conclud- ed as your ambassador [Randolph – R.S.] stated … And in the light of that, We too shall set these affairs aside.” The tsar went on to demand the return of all the letters patent he had given to the English company and informed London that “all the charters on commercial matters granted by Us before today are invalid.”1 The peace settlement on the western borders was flimsy and short-lived, but it freed Russia’s hands for war with Sweden. On 25 June 1570, the Boyar Duma ratified the decision to move forces up to Reval (Kolyvan’ in the Russian chron- icles), which was tantamount to declaring war on Sweden. The fall of Reval would inevitably have meant the end of Swedish dominion in Estland. The continuing hostilities between Denmark and Sweden encouraged Rus- sia to hope for the support of Denmark and the Danish navy. Duke Magnus had made the tsar a firm promise of such military assistance. But trusting the duke’s assurances proved an unfortunate blunder for oprichnina diplomacy. At the height of the Russian siege of Reval, Denmark made peace with Sweden. The hoped-for alliance with Copenhagen came to naught. The Livonian king approached Revel on 21 August 1570. His army numbered some one thousand men including mercenary landsknechts and three squad- rons of Livonian nobles. This force was wholly inadequate for a siege of the 1 Poslaniia 1951, pp. 142f. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2016 | doi 10.1163/9789004304017_017 The End of the Oprichnina 397 fortress. Magnus, however, placed his trust more in persuasion than in force. During the first months of the siege, he wrote a continuous stream of letters to those commanding the fortress. Early in September, the Russians brought some light artillery to Magnus’s camp from Narva, but the small cannon did not cause any damage to the city. On 16 October two voevody appeared outside Reval: Ivan Yakovlev-Zakhar’in with zemshchina units and Vasilii Umnoi-Koly- chev with oprichniki. Between them they had an army of 4,000–5,000 men. The voevody called on the defenders of Reval to submit, threatening severe punishments for resistance. In Ivan’s name they demanded the surrender of the city to the tsar’s “vassal” and promised to open the way to all parts of Russia for the merchants of Reval to trade freely. The city magistracy rejected their demands, but the oprichniki did not display valour on the field of battle and began instead to plunder and burn defenceless villages in the hinterland of Reval. Magnus understood that the oprichnina savagery would lose him the support of the Livonian nobles. His attempt to reason with his allies resulted in a sharp clash with the voevody. In this argument Ivan IV took the side of the Livonian king. On the tsar’s orders, the two senior commanders, Ivan Yakovlev- Zakhar’in and Vasilii Umnoi-Kolychev, were arrested and taken to Moscow in irons. King Magnus’s retinue hastened to explain their detention as a punish- ment for cruelty towards their master’s Livonian subjects. In a letter to the commanders of Reval they claimed that the “wicked voevody” had wanted to blacken Magnus in the eyes of the tsar and ruin the good city of Reval for ever. “When the tsar learned of such roguish dealings, … he gave orders last Saturday for both voevody to be taken from here in chains and withdrew all the oprich- niki.” The arrest of the voevody was connected not so much with excesses in Livo- nia as with the continuing investigation into Novgorodian treachery and the withdrawal of the oprichnina detachments was due to the need to refresh the strength of the besiegers. The change of forces led to the complete suspension of siege works. It was in this period of complete inaction that Magnus informed the defenders that he “had no intention of lifting the siege and was only wait- ing for the arrival of Prince Yurii [Tokmakov] with a huge force and artillery.”2 Travelling by the winter route, Tokmakov’s army arrived outside Reval on 12 January 1571. The onset of freezing weather made siege works more difficult. The voevody could not get the cannon close enough to the city walls and a month and a half of bombardment did not yield the desired results. 2 A. Chumikov, “Osada Revelia (1570–1571) gertsogom Magnusom,” Chteniia OIRD, 1891, Book 2, pp. 21, 29f..
Recommended publications
  • Charles J. Halperin

    Charles J. Halperin

    RussianStudiesHu 2020 Charles J. Halperin AN AGNOSTIC APPROACH TO IVAN THE TERRIBLE1 In order to demonstrate that everything significant about Ivan’s life is contested, this article attempts to catalog as many as possible of the contested major issues touching Ivan. The author defines what we donot know about Ivan as everything that is uncertain, disputed, contested, problematic, or unexplained, even or especially if some historians think we know it but cannot “prove” it beyond a shadow of a doubt. Consequently, the author is conflating problems of source provenance, definition of concepts, interpretation, context, contradiction, and comparison, and thus reducing suggestive analysis and probable explanation to the unknown. The author has organized this survey of our ignorance under thematic rubrics: Sources, Ivan’s Life, Political History, Social History, Religion and the Church, Economic History, Foreign Policy, and Ivan’s Legacy. Any historian who proposes to study Ivan should begin by realizing the degree of uncertainty attached to historical studies of his life and reign. Keywords: Muscovy, Ivan the Terrible, oprichnina, Simeon Bekbulatovich, Kazan’, Livonian War, insanity Charles J. Halperin – Ph.D. in History, Research Associate, Russian and East European Institute, Indiana University (303 East 8th Street, Apt 4, Bloomington, IN 47408-3574). E-mail: [email protected] 1 I wish to thank the anonymous reader for RussianStudiesHu for his thoughtful comments. DOI: 10.38210/RUSTUDH.2020.2.3 152 Charles J. Halperin “Everything significant about Ivan’s life is contested.”2 The only consensus among historians who have studied Ivan is confined to a bare-bones chronology of events which does not extend to explanations of their causation or evaluations of their significance.
  • Investment in the East India Company

    Investment in the East India Company

    The University of Manchester Research The Global Interests of London's Commercial Community, 1599-1625: investment in the East India Company DOI: 10.1111/ehr.12665 Document Version Accepted author manuscript Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Smith, E. (2018). The Global Interests of London's Commercial Community, 1599-1625: investment in the East India Company. The Economic History Review, 71(4), 1118-1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12665 Published in: The Economic History Review Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:05. Oct. 2021 The global interests of London’s commercial community, 1599-1625: investment in the East India Company The English East India Company (EIC) has long been identified as an organisation that foreshadowed developments in finance, investment and overseas expansion that would come to fruition over the course of the following two centuries.
  • Governance on Russia's Early-Modern Frontier

    Governance on Russia's Early-Modern Frontier

    ABSOLUTISM AND EMPIRE: GOVERNANCE ON RUSSIA’S EARLY-MODERN FRONTIER DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Matthew Paul Romaniello, B. A., M. A. The Ohio State University 2003 Examination Committee: Approved by Dr. Eve Levin, Advisor Dr. Geoffrey Parker Advisor Dr. David Hoffmann Department of History Dr. Nicholas Breyfogle ABSTRACT The conquest of the Khanate of Kazan’ was a pivotal event in the development of Muscovy. Moscow gained possession over a previously independent political entity with a multiethnic and multiconfessional populace. The Muscovite political system adapted to the unique circumstances of its expanding frontier and prepared for the continuing expansion to its east through Siberia and to the south down to the Caspian port city of Astrakhan. Muscovy’s government attempted to incorporate quickly its new land and peoples within the preexisting structures of the state. Though Muscovy had been multiethnic from its origins, the Middle Volga Region introduced a sizeable Muslim population for the first time, an event of great import following the Muslim conquest of Constantinople in the previous century. Kazan’s social composition paralleled Moscow’s; the city and its environs contained elites, peasants, and slaves. While the Muslim elite quickly converted to Russian Orthodoxy to preserve their social status, much of the local population did not, leaving Moscow’s frontier populated with animists and Muslims, who had stronger cultural connections to their nomadic neighbors than their Orthodox rulers. The state had two major goals for the Middle Volga Region.
  • Russia in Early Modern English Travel Accounts

    Russia in Early Modern English Travel Accounts

    Lloyd E. Berry, Robert O. Crummey, eds.. Rude and Barbarous Kingdom: Russia in the Accounts of Sixteenth-Century English Voyagers. 1968; Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2012. xxiii + 391 pp. $34.95, paper, ISBN 978-0-299-04764-1. Reviewed by Maike Sach Published on H-HistGeog (August, 2013) Commissioned by Eva M. Stolberg (University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany) For a long time, European travel accounts on material in this edition, repeatedly reprinted in Muscovy and Russia have been valuable sources older editions and compilations, was modernized for researching late medieval and early modern in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization by Russian history.[1] Using various methods and ap‐ Lloyd E. Berry, a specialist in English literature. proaches, publications originally written and Robert O. Crummey, well known for his excellent printed in the sixteenth century depict Muscovy studies in premodern Russian history, was re‐ in general, and its rulers and form of government sponsible for the general introduction, placing the in particular. The reports can be divided into two writings--which are very different in extent, con‐ major groups: texts of continental origin and writ‐ tent, and comprehension--clearly and briefly in ings by English authors. This classification is not historical context. He also wrote the essays that merely a geographical one but rather a funda‐ introduce the primary texts and their authors. mental matter of perspective defined by the very The annotation of the travel accounts was a col‐ nature of the encounters of trading Englishmen laborative effort of both editors. The book was and Russians on the one side and the violent con‐ first published in 1968, and soon became a suc‐ flict of Russians and their continental neighbors cessful standard sourcebook both in research and in the long-lasting Livonian War (1558-82/83) on university teaching.
  • Company Directors' Social Networks, 1657-1698

    Company Directors' Social Networks, 1657-1698

    Aske Laursen Brock, University of Kent Do not cite or circulate Company directors’ social networks, 1657-1698 Over the course of the seventeenth century, a number of overseas trading companies were chartered, challenged, dissolved and expanded across the globe, all while England experienced civil wars, a republic, restoration and political, financial and scientific revolutions. The directors of these companies were integral to these events and in shaping the English political economy. They were important intermediaries between different institutions, different places and different ideas, and whereas the directors were concerned with commerce and with regulation of members at the beginning of the century, at century’s end they managed land, capital flows and large global societies. This paper will examine continuities in the commercial community 1657-1698 based on a database consisting of information on 1257 trading company directors who shared thousands of connections. The examined individuals are those elected to hold office in seven trading companies as well as the Bank of England. Governors, deputies, treasurers and directors from the East India, New East India, Levant, Royal African, Virginia, Hudson’s Bay, Muscovy companies and the Bank of England. These companies differed from other trading companies of the time through their durability, the distances they covered in their trade and in innovating new ways of commercial governance.1 The individuals who governed the companies hybridised knowledge from existing corporate governance
  • Muscovy and the English Quest for a Northeastern Passage to Cathay (1553-1584)

    Muscovy and the English Quest for a Northeastern Passage to Cathay (1553-1584)

    Title <ARTICLE>Muscovy and the English Quest for a Northeastern Passage to Cathay (1553-1584) Author(s) Baron, Samuel H. Citation Acta Slavica Iaponica, 3, 1-17 Issue Date 1985 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/7944 Type bulletin (article) File Information KJ00000034092.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP 1 Muscovy and the English Quest for a Northeastern Passage to Cathay (1553-1584) Samuel H. Baron The many accounts we have of early Anglo-Russian relations invariably begin with the Willoughby-Chancellor expedition of 1553 that opened a route to the White Sea and brought in its wake the establishment of the Muscovy Company. Thereafter, attention generally focuses on the vicissitudes of the company, the course of diplomatic relations between the two countries, and the intimate connections between the foregoing. l I propose to examine another dimension of the story that has received less scrutiny than it deserves. This paper is the first installment of a two-part study of English efforts from the mid-sixteenth century to 1615 to explore the seas and coasts of northern Russia east of the White Sea, with a view to the discovery of a passage to the orient and, secondarily, the development of trade relations with northeastern Russia.2 1 The two most important works are I. Liubimenko, Les relations commerciales et politiques de I'Angleterre avec la Russie avant Pierre Ie Grand (Paris, 1933); T. S. Willan, The Early History of the Russia Company 1553-1603 (Manchester, 1956). Other studies and the main sources on which they are based are listed in "Ivan the Terrible, Giles Fletcher and the Muscovite Merchantry: A Reconsideration," Chapter N of my Muscovite Russia: Collected Essays (London, 1980), notes 5 and 6.
  • Introduction to the History of Russia (Ix-Xviii Century)

    Introduction to the History of Russia (Ix-Xviii Century)

    THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod National Research University K.V. Kemaev INTRODUCTION TO THE HISTORY OF RUSSIA (IX-XVIII CENTURY) TUTORIAL Nizhni Novgorod 2017 МИНИСТЕРСТВО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ И НАУКИ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский Нижегородский государственный университет им. Н.И. Лобачевского» К.В. Кемаев ВВЕДЕНИЕ В КУРС ПО ИСТОРИИ РОССИИ (IX-XVIII ВЕКА) Учебно-методическое пособие по дисциплине «История» Рекомендовано методической комиссией Института экономики и предпринимательства ННГУ для иностранных студентов, обучающихся по направлению подготовки 38.03.01 «Экономика» (бакалавриат) на английском языке Нижний Новгород 2017 2 УДК 94 ББК 63.3 К-35 К-35 К.В. Кемаев. Введение в курс по истории России (IX-XVIII века): Учебно-методическое пособие. – Нижний Новгород: Нижегородский госуниверситет, 2017. − 81 с. Рецензент: к.э.н., доцент Ю.А.Гриневич В настоящем пособии изложены учебно-методические материалы по курсу «История» для иностранных студентов, обучающихся в ННГУ по направлению подготовки 38.03.01 «Экономика» (бакалавриат). Пособие дает возможность бакалаврам расширить основные знания о истории, овладевать умением комплексно подходить к вопросам развития, использовать различные источники информации; развивать экономическое мышление Ответственный за выпуск: председатель методической комиссии ИЭП ННГУ, к.э.н., доцент Летягина Е.Н. УДК 94 ББК 63.3 К.В.Кемаев Нижегородский государственный университет им. Н.И. Лобачевского, 2017 3 2 CONTENTS Course Agenda 3 Session 1. Russian lands before 862 AD 4 Session 2. First Rurikids and foundation of the Rus’ of Kiev 7 8 Session 3. Decline & political fragmentation of the Rus’ of Kiev 11 Session 4.
  • Researching North America: Sir Humphrey Gilbert's 1583

    Researching North America: Sir Humphrey Gilbert's 1583

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History History, Department of 5-2013 Researching North America: Sir Humphrey Gilbert’s 1583 Expedition and a Reexamination of Early Modern English Colonization in the North Atlantic World Nathan Probasco University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss Part of the European History Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the United States History Commons Probasco, Nathan, "Researching North America: Sir Humphrey Gilbert’s 1583 Expedition and a Reexamination of Early Modern English Colonization in the North Atlantic World" (2013). Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History. 56. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss/56 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Researching North America: Sir Humphrey Gilbert’s 1583 Expedition and a Reexamination of Early Modern English Colonization in the North Atlantic World by Nathan J. Probasco A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: History Under the Supervision of Professor Carole B. Levin Lincoln, Nebraska May, 2013 Researching North America: Sir Humphrey Gilbert’s 1583 Expedition and a Reexamination of Early Modern English Colonization in the North Atlantic World Nathan J. Probasco, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2013 Advisor: Carole B.
  • Ivan the Terrible and His Secret Police

    Ivan the Terrible and His Secret Police

    Ivan the Terrible and His Secret Police The Oprichnina (a secret-police organization which existed between 1565-1572) consisted of about 6,000 political police (called oprichniki) who were at the service of Tsar Ivan IV (also known as "Ivan Grozny," meaning "Ivan the Terrible"). The job of the secret police was to find individuals who were supposedly plotting against the Tsar, then confiscate their lands and put the plotters to death. As Ivan IV designed the system, it would function outside the boundaries of law. Persecutions took place without any legal limits and without restraint. Although he claimed to be deeply religious, the Tsar did not spare clerics—or the wealth contained in some Russian Orthodox churches—if religious men were rounded-up by the oprichniki. Russian nobles and aristocrats were the main targets of this system of domestic terror. As the oprichniki became more ruthless, more people died. The city of Novgorod was particularly hard hit. In this work of water-color-and-charcoal-on-paper, by Apollinary Vasnetsov (1856-1933), we see members of the Oprichnina coming into a town. The immediate result is that everyone flees as fast as they can. This scene was used as a setting for Tchaikovsky's opera The Oprichnik. In the end, the nobles and aristocrats rose up against the Oprichnina: Under conditions of mass terror, universal fear, and denunciations, the apparatus of violence created in the Oprichnina acquired an entirely overwhelming influence on the political structure of the leadership. In the final analysis, the infernal machine of terror escaped from the control of its creators.
  • Political Economy 43 William A

    Political Economy 43 William A

    The Corporation as a Protagonist in Global History, c. 1550– 1750 Global Economic History Series Series Editors Maarten Prak (Utrecht University) Jan Luiten van Zanden (Utrecht University) Editorial Board Gareth Austin (University of Cambridge) Johan Fourie (Stellenbosch University) Christine Moll- Murata (Ruhr- Universität Bochum) Elise van Nederveen Meerkerk (Wageningen University) Şevket Pamuk (Boğazici University, Istanbul) Kenneth L. Pomeranz (University of Chicago) Tirthankar Roy (London School of Economics and Political Science) Peer H.H. Vries (University of Vienna) volume 16 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ gehs The Corporation as a Protagonist in Global History, c. 1550– 1750 Edited by William A. Pettigrew and David Veevers LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the prevailing CC-BY-NC-ND License at the time of publication, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Cover illustration: Kalamkari Hanging with Figures in an Architectural Setting, ca. 1640–50, The Metropolitan Museum, New York, nos. MMA 20.79. URL: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/447118. The figures in this cotton panel were once part of a larger hanging of men and women displayed in Armenian, Indian, Persian and European fashion, originating in the Deccan. They were likely produced either for the Golcondan court or by consumers for circulation and display in India or Europe. They are a striking example of the confluence of cosmopolitan cultural expression prevalent in the Deccan at the time. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Pettigrew, William A.
  • The Double Standard: Livonian Chronicles and Muscovite Barbarity During the Livonian War (1558–1582)*

    The Double Standard: Livonian Chronicles and Muscovite Barbarity During the Livonian War (1558–1582)*

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Saint Petersburg State University Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana УДК 929.713+94(47).043+94(474.2); ББК 63.3(0)4, 63.3(2)44; DOI https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu19.2018.106 Charles J. Halperin THE DOUBLE STANDARD: LIVONIAN CHRONICLES AND MUSCOVITE BARBARITY DURING THE LIVONIAN WAR (1558–1582)* When Ivan IV (Ivan the Terrible, 1533–1584) ordered a Muscovite army to invade Livonia in 1558 he not only launched a war of weapons, but also a war of words. The war propaganda issued by Muscovy’s opponents contributed significantly to the development of the negative image of Ivan as a tyrant and the Russophobic stereotype of Russians as barbarians which persist to this day. This article deals with one genre of these sources, the chronicles written by Livonian Germans during the Livonian War: Johannes Renner’s Livonian History1, * I wish to express my sincerest appreciation to the anonymous reader for Studia Slavica et Balca- nica Petropolitana for valuable comments, and to David Goldfrank for providing me with a copy of the recent monograph by Cornelia Soldat, which is virtually inaccessible in the US. I am solely responsible for all remaining errors. 1 Johannes Renner’s Livonian History 1556–1561 / Tr. Jerry C. Smith and William Urban with J. Ward Jones. Lewiston; NY, 1997. © Charles J. Halperin, 2018 126 Петербургские славянские и балканские исследования Charles J. Halperin. The Double Standard ... Balthasar Russow’s Chronicle2, and Salomon Henning’s Chronicle of Courland and Livonia3, whose selection I will discuss below.
  • University of Groningen Arctic Whaling Jacob, H.K. S'; Snoeijing, K

    University of Groningen Arctic Whaling Jacob, H.K. S'; Snoeijing, K

    University of Groningen Arctic whaling Jacob, H.K. s'; Snoeijing, K Published in: EPRINTS-BOOK-TITLE IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 1984 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Jacob, H. K. S., & Snoeijing, K. (1984). Arctic whaling: proceedings of the International Symposium Arctic Whaling February 1983. In EPRINTS-BOOK-TITLE (8 ed.). s.n.. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 25-09-2021 HISTORICAL SURVEY OF THE EUROPEAN WHALING INDUSTRY by Richard Vaughan Defining the Arctic is not just a question oflatitude. Southampton Island in the north of Hudson Bay, surrounded by ice in winter and the centre of a historic Arctic whale fishery, is in the same latitude, namely just south of the Arctic Circle, as Iceland.