DOCSLIB.ORG

Cognitive Neuroscience Student Handbook 2019-2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cognitive Neuroscience Student Handbook 2019-2020 M.S. Program in Cognitive Neuroscience 2019-2020 The Graduate Center 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4309 [email protected] https://www.gc.cuny.edu/Page-Elements/Academics-Research-Centers-Initiatives/Masters- Programs/Cognitive-Neuroscience Disclaimer: The M.S. Program in Cognitive Neuroscience reserves the right to make changes to this Student Handbook, as necessary, depending on changes made by The Graduate Center or the program. Please check our website regularly to ensure that you have the most recent copy. Parts of this handbook provide a brief overview of The Graduate Center Student Handbook and The Graduate Center Bulletin; please refer to them for further information and/or clarification of The Graduate Center policies. 2 Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Letter from the Director ................................................................................................................................ 6 About the M.S. Program in Cognitive Neuroscience ................................................................................... 7 Program Goals ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Program Officers ................................................................................................................................................ 7 College Assistant(s)........................................................................................................................................ 7 Program and The Graduate Center Representatives ........................................................................................ 8 Executive Committee ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Faculty Representatives | 2019-2022 .......................................................................................................... 8 Student Representatives | 2019-2020 ......................................................................................................... 8 Degree Requirements ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Time To Degree.............................................................................................................................................. 8 Course Requirements..................................................................................................................................... 8 Core Requirements .................................................................................................................................... 9 Electives ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 Courses Outside of the Options Offered ................................................................................................. 12 Laboratory Work/Mentorship ...................................................................................................................... 12 Master’s Thesis .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Research Funding ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Program Policies ............................................................................................................................................... 13 Registration ................................................................................................................................................... 13 Transcripts (Official and Unofficial) ............................................................................................................ 14 Transfer Credits ............................................................................................................................................ 14 The Graduate Center’s Ph.D. Programs in Neuroscience ........................................................................ 14 Leaves of Absence ......................................................................................................................................... 14 Withdrawal ................................................................................................................................................... 15 Readmissions ................................................................................................................................................. 15 Maintenance of Matriculation ...................................................................................................................... 15 Commencement and Graduation ................................................................................................................. 16 Grading .............................................................................................................................................................. 16 Grades/GPA ............................................................................................................................................... 16 Incompletes ............................................................................................................................................... 17 3 Satisfactory Academic Progress ................................................................................................................ 17 M.S. Program in Cognitive Neuroscience’s Student Workspace .................................................................... 17 Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 Maintenance.................................................................................................................................................. 18 Computers ................................................................................................................................................. 18 Equipment ................................................................................................................................................. 18 3D Printer .................................................................................................................................................. 18 Mailboxes ................................................................................................................................................... 19 Refrigerator ............................................................................................................................................... 19 The Graduate Center Student Resources ......................................................................................................... 19 The Mina Rees Library .................................................................................................................................. 19 The Office of Career Planning and Professional Development ................................................................. 20 CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative Seminars/Colloquia ............................................................................ 20 The Office of the Registrar .......................................................................................................................... 20 The Office of the Bursar .............................................................................................................................. 20 The Office of Admissions ............................................................................................................................. 21 The Office for Student Affairs ...................................................................................................................... 21 The Office of Financial Aid ........................................................................................................................... 21 Fellowships | Scholarships ........................................................................................................................ 21 Loans .......................................................................................................................................................... 21 Information Technology .............................................................................................................................. 22 Student Disabilities Services ....................................................................................................................... 23 The Wellness Center .................................................................................................................................... 23 The Office of International Students .......................................................................................................... 24 The Office of Security and Public Safety ..................................................................................................... 24 M.S. in Cognitive Neuroscience Faculty ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tor Wager Diana L
    Tor Wager Diana L. Taylor Distinguished Professor of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College Email: [email protected] https://wagerlab.colorado.edu Last Updated: July, 2019 Executive summary ● Appointments: Faculty since 2004, starting as Assistant Professor at Columbia ​ University. Associate Professor in 2009, moved to University of Colorado, Boulder in 2010; Professor since 2014. 2019-Present: Diana L. Taylor Distinguished Professor of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Dartmouth College. ● Publications: 240 publications with >50,000 total citations (Google Scholar), 11 papers ​ cited over 1000 times. H-index = 79. Journals include Science, Nature, New England Journal of Medicine, Nature Neuroscience, Neuron, Nature Methods, PNAS, Psychological Science, PLoS Biology, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Nature Reviews Neurology, Nature Medicine, Journal of Neuroscience. ● Funding: Currently principal investigator on 3 NIH R01s, and co-investigator on other ​ collaborative grants. Past funding sources include NIH, NSF, Army Research Institute, Templeton Foundation, DoD. P.I. on 4 R01s, 1 R21, 1 RC1, 1 NSF. ● Awards: Awards include NSF Graduate Fellowship, MacLean Award from American ​ Psychosomatic Society, Colorado Faculty Research Award, “Rising Star” from American Psychological Society, Cognitive Neuroscience Society Young Investigator Award, Web of Science “Highly Cited Researcher”, Fellow of American Psychological Society. Two patents on research products. ● Outreach: >300 invited talks at universities/international conferences since 2005. ​ Invited talks in Psychology, Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, Psychiatry, Neurology, Anesthesiology, Radiology, Medical Anthropology, Marketing, and others. Media outreach: Featured in New York Times, The Economist, NPR (Science Friday and Radiolab), CBS Evening News, PBS special on healing, BBC, BBC Horizons, Fox News, 60 Minutes, others.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroplasticity in Adult Human Visual Cortex
    Neuroplasticity in adult human visual cortex Elisa Castaldi1, Claudia Lunghi2 and Maria Concetta Morrone3,4 1 Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy 2 Laboratoire des systèmes perceptifs, Département d’études cognitives, École normale supérieure, PSL University, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France 3 Department of Translational Research and New technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy 4 IRCCS Stella Maris, Calambrone (Pisa), Italy Abstract Between 1-5:100 people worldwide has never experienced normotypic vision due to a condition called amblyopia, and about 1:4000 suffer from inherited retinal dystrophies that progressively lead them to blindness. While a wide range of technologies and therapies are being developed to restore vision, a fundamental question still remains unanswered: would the adult visual brain retain a sufficient plastic potential to learn how to ‘see’ after a prolonged period of abnormal visual experience? In this review we summarize studies showing that the visual brain of sighted adults retains a type of developmental plasticity, called homeostatic plasticity, and this property has been recently exploited successfully for adult amblyopia recover. Next, we discuss how the brain circuits reorganizes when visual stimulation is partially restored by means of a ‘bionic eye’ in late blinds with Retinitis Pigmentosa. The primary visual cortex in these patients slowly became activated by the artificial visual stimulation, indicating that
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Engineering Engineering Is at the Heart of Society, Underpinning and Continually Improving the Quality of Our Lives
    The Royal Academy of Engineering UK Focus for Biomedical Engineering Policy Briefing Neural engineering Engineering is at the heart of society, underpinning and continually improving the quality of our lives. The Royal Academy of Engineering brings together the country’s most eminent engineers from all disciplines to promote excellence and support the engineering performance of the UK. Biomedical engineering creates new medical technologies and systems that can greatly improve patient care and quality of life. The UK Focus for Biomedical Engineering is the Academy’s forum for this increasingly important area of engineering in which the UK is taking a lead. Introduction interfacing technology directly with the A second example of neuroprosthetics human nervous system. is deep brain stimulation (DBS), which Biomedical engineering is constantly involves the surgical implantation of a expanding and extending the areas There are already real-world clinical medical device called a brain pacemaker of application within healthcare. solutions for areas such as controlling that sends electrical pulses to very Technological developments, coupled essential tremor through implants in with a stronger understanding of specific parts of the brain. While DBS in deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s biological processes brought about specific brain regions has provided very Disease, vagal nerve stimulation for help by cutting-edge research, create new good therapeutic benefits for otherwise in controlling epilepsy, and the use of areas within biomedical engineering. treatment-resistant movement and Neural engineering is one such recent cochlear implants to restore hearing in affective disorders such as chronic pain development. the profoundly deaf (neuroprosthetics). and dystonia, it is in Parkinson’s disease and tremor that DBS is best known.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Curriculum in Neural Engineering with Emphasis on Design of Neural Systems
    Session ???? A New Curriculum in Neural Engineering with Emphasis on Design of Neural Systems John R. Hetling, Christopher M. Comer*, and Richard L. Magin Departments of Bioengineering / *Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago Introduction. Academic and commercial research teams are currently developing a new generation of devices that will interact with, incorporate, and/or emulate living nervous systems. Neural prostheses to restore hearing, mobility or sight will offer a wider range of function; robotic devices will become more effective with “neuromorphic” control systems; fundamentally new methods for processing information will be motivated by biological systems. Neural Engineering is the intellectual force behind these developments, supported by recent advances in cellular neurobiology, microfabrication and neural modeling. Based on decades of quantitative approaches to increase our understanding of neural systems, bioengineers are now beginning to design neural systems and neural interfaces. Neural engineers have new tools to control aspects of these systems such as guided axon growth and multielectrode arrays for stimulation and recording. In addition to potential applications attracting the attention of biotech and defense industries, these efforts in turn increase our understanding of natural neural systems. One of the most intriguing aspects of contemporary Neural Engineering is the increasing degree to which scientists can repair and exploit the properties of neural systems, including applications such as neural prostheses, biosensors, or hybrid neural computing devices. The former application currently supports significant industrial involvement; for example, Clarion and Medtronic have commercially available cochlear implants, and Optobionics Inc. (IL) and Second Sight (CA) are companies developing prostheses for vision (in existence for approximately 14 and 4 years, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Intention, Emotion, and Action: a Neural Theory Based on Semantic Pointers
    Cognitive Science 38 (2014) 851–880 Copyright © 2013 Cognitive Science Society, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 0364-0213 print / 1551-6709 online DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12100 Intention, Emotion, and Action: A Neural Theory Based on Semantic Pointers Tobias Schroder,€ Terrence C. Stewart, Paul Thagard Department of Philosophy, University of Waterloo Received 14 May 2012; received in revised form 3 March 2013; accepted 28 March 2013 Abstract We propose a unified theory of intentions as neural processes that integrate representations of states of affairs, actions, and emotional evaluation. We show how this theory provides answers to philosophical questions about the concept of intention, psychological questions about human behav- ior, computational questions about the relations between belief and action, and neuroscientific questions about how the brain produces actions. Our theory of intention ties together biologically plausible mechanisms for belief, planning, and motor control. The computational feasibility of these mechanisms is shown by a model that simulates psychologically important cases of intention. Keywords: Intention; Emotion; Action; Implementation intentions; Automatic; Deliberative; Planning; Neural engineering framework; Semantic pointers 1. The problem of explaining intention The concept of intention is important in many disciplines, including philosophy, psy- chology, artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, and law. For example, criminal law treats cases where one person intends to kill another very differently from cases where death results unintentionally from negligence. Despite decades of discussions, how- ever, there is no received theory of intention within any of these disciplines, let alone a theory that accounts for all the phenomena identified across all of the disciplines. We propose a unified theory of intentions as neural processes that integrate representa- tions of states of affairs, actions, and emotional evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Brain-Machine Interface: from Neurophysiology to Clinical
    Neurophysiology of Brain-Machine Interface Rehabilitation Matija Milosevic, Osaka University - Graduate School of Engineering Science - Japan. Abstract— Long-lasting cortical re-organization or II. METHODS neuroplasticity depends on the ability to synchronize the descending (voluntary) commands and the successful execution Stimulation of muscles with FES was delivered using a of the task using a neuroprosthetic. This talk will discuss the constant current biphasic waveform with a 300μs pulse width neurophysiological mechanisms of brain-machine interface at 50 Hz frequency via surface electrodes. First, repetitive (BMI) controlled neuroprosthetics with the aim to provide transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) intermittent theta implications for development of technologies for rehabilitation. burst protocol (iTBS) was used to induce cortical facilitation. iTBS protocol consists of pulses delivered intermittently at a I. INTRODUCTION frequency of 50 Hz and 5 Hz for a total of 200 seconds. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) neuroprosthetics Moreover, motor imagery protocol was used to display a can be used to applying short electric impulses over the virtual reality hand opening and closing sequence of muscles or the nerves to generate hand muscle contractions movements (hand flexion/extension) while subject’s hands and functional movements such as reaching and grasping. remained at rest and out of the visual field. Our work has shown that recruitment of muscles using FES goes beyond simple contractions, with evidence suggesting III. RESULTS re-organization of the spinal reflex networks and cortical- Our first results showed that motor imagery can affect level changes after the stimulating period [1,2]. However, a major challenge remains in achieving precise temporal corticospinal facilitation in a phase-dependent manner, i.e., synchronization of voluntary commands and activation of the hand flexor muscles during hand closing and extensor muscles [3].
    [Show full text]
  • A Neural Engineering Track Within Bioengineering: Lecture and Lab Courses
    2006-2510: A NEURAL ENGINEERING TRACK WITHIN BIOENGINEERING: LECTURE AND LAB COURSES David Schneeweis, University of Illinois-Chicago J Hetling, University of Illinois-Chicago Patrick Rousche, University of Illinois-Chicago Page 11.77.1 Page © American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A NEURAL ENGINEERING TRACK WITHIN BIOENGINEERING: LECTURE AND LAB COURSES Neural engineering as a distinct specialty within bioengineering Neural engineering (also called neuroengineering) has recently been identified as an emerging field of specialization within the broader field of biomedical engineering, or bioengineering. (The terms “biomedical engineering” and “bioengineering” are virtually synonymous in most contexts, so “bioengineering” will be used in this article for simplicity.) Neural engineers self-identify as engineers/scientists interested in engineering challenges related to the brain and nervous system. It has been referred to as a “merger of engineering and neuroscience” [1]. Many neural engineers work on clinically oriented challenges, including for example developing sensory prostheses for the deaf and blind or designing systems to stimulate walking motion in the legs of spinal chord injury patients. But other neural engineers are interested primarily in understanding how the brain and nervous system work, or are affected by disease. Although engineers and scientists have been doing this kind of work for decades, it is only within the last decade or so that neural engineering has become recognized as a named sub- specialty. Indeed it has only been recently that “neural engineering” has existed as a distinct subject track at the annual meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society. But the field is rapidly growing as witnessed by the establishment of the Journal of Neural Engineering in 2004, and the holding of the 1st International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Internal Review Committee
    Center for Neuroscience & Society University of Pennsylvania REPORT TO THE INTERNAL REVIEW COMMITTEE I. Mission …………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….. p. 2 II. History …………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….. p. 2 III. People ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. p. 2 Faculty Staff Fellows Visiting Scholars Advisory Board IV. Funding …………………………………………………………………………………………………….…… p. 4 V. Space and Facilities ………………………………………………………………………………………… p. 4 VI. Overview .……………………………………………………………………………………………………… p. 5 VII. Research on Neuroscience and Society…………………………………………………………. P. 5 VIII. Outreach (Including K-12 Education) …………………………………………………………… p. 7 Online Public Talks Academic Outreach Within Penn Outreach Beyond Penn Conferences K-12 Education IX. Higher Education ………………………………………………………………………………………….. p. 11 Neuroscience Boot Camp Continuing Medical Education Neuroethics Learning Collaborative Penn Fellowships in Neuroscience and Society New Courses Preceptorials Graduate Certificate in Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (SCAN) X. Conclusions, Challenges for the Future …………………………………………………………… p. 15 Appendices 1-11 Submitted April 9, 2016, by Martha J. Farah, Director of the Center for Neuroscience & Society 1 I. Mission Neuroscience is giving us increasingly powerful methods for understanding, predicting and manipulating the human mind. Every sphere of life in which psychology plays a central role – from education and family life to law and politics – will be touched by these advances, and some will be profoundly transformed.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephanie Bugden Curriculum Vitae (Pdf)
    Stephanie Bugden, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Fellow email: [email protected] Department of Psychology Phone number: (919) 884-9870 The University of Pennsylvania 425 S. University Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19104 Education and Training Postdoctoral Fellow, March 2015 – Present Duke University (Mar 2015-Aug 2015) & The University of Pennsylvania Supervisor: Dr. Elizabeth M. Brannon The University of Western Ontario, December, 2014 Ph.D., Psychology Supervisor: Dr. Daniel Ansari Thesis Title: Characterizing persistent developmental dyscalculia: A cognitive neuroscience approach The University of Western Ontario, August, 2010 M.Ed., Special Education and Educational Psychology Supervisor: Dr. Daniel Ansari The University of Western Ontario, April, 2008 B.A., Honors in Psychology, Developmental & Educational, Minor in French Publications Google Scholar Citations (as of September 10, 2018): 353, h-index: 5 (i10-index: 5) † reviews, chapters, commentaries †Dresler, T., Bugden, S., Gouet, C., Lallier, M., Oliveira, D., Pinheiro-Chagas, P., Pires, A., Want, Y., Zugarramudi, C., & Weissheimer, J. (2018). A translational framework of educational neuroscience in learning disorders. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 12:25, doi: 10.3389/fnint.2018.00025. Lyons, I.M., Bugden, S., Zhang, S., De Jesus, S., & Ansari, D. (2018). Symbolic number skills predict growth in nonsymbolic number skills in kindergarteners. Developmental Psychology, 5(3), 440-457. †Bugden, S., DeWind, N., & Brannon, E. M. (2016). Using cognitive training to unravel the mechanistic link between the approximate number system and symbolic math skills, Current Opinions in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.05.002. Bugden, S., & Ansari, D. (2016). Probing the nature of deficits in the ‘Approximate Number System’ in children with persistent Developmental Dyscalculia.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Learning in the Biomedical Applications: Recent and Future Status
    applied sciences Article Deep Learning in the Biomedical Applications: Recent and Future Status Ryad Zemouri 1,*, Noureddine Zerhouni 2 and Daniel Racoceanu 3 1 CEDRIC Laboratory of the Conservatoire National des Arts et métiers (CNAM), HESAM Université, 292, rue Saint-Martin, 750141 Paris CEDEX 03, France 2 FEMTO-ST, University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, 15B avenue des Montboucons, 25030 Besançon CEDEX, France; [email protected] 3 Sorbonne University, 4 Place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France; [email protected] or [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 March 2019; Accepted: 9 April 2019; Published: 12 April 2019 Abstract: Deep neural networks represent, nowadays, the most effective machine learning technology in biomedical domain. In this domain, the different areas of interest concern the Omics (study of the genome—genomics—and proteins—transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics), bioimaging (study of biological cell and tissue), medical imaging (study of the human organs by creating visual representations), BBMI (study of the brain and body machine interface) and public and medical health management (PmHM). This paper reviews the major deep learning concepts pertinent to such biomedical applications. Concise overviews are provided for the Omics and the BBMI. We end our analysis with a critical discussion, interpretation and relevant open challenges. Keywords: deep neural networks; biomedical applications; Omics; medical imaging; brain and body machine interface 1. Introduction The biomedical domain nourishes a very rich research field with many applications, medical specialties and associated pathologies. Some of these pathologies are very well-known and mastered by physicians, but others, much less. With the technological and scientific advances, the biomedical data used by the medical practitioners are very heterogeneous, such as a wide range of clinical analyses and parameters, biological parameters and medical imaging modalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Blaming the Brain
    Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology Volume 11 Issue 1 Article 5 2010 Blaming the Brain Steven K. Erickson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjlst Recommended Citation Steven K. Erickson, Blaming the Brain, 11 MINN. J.L. SCI. & TECH. 27 (2010). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjlst/vol11/iss1/5 The Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. ERICKSON SK. Blaming the Brain. MINN. J.L. SCI. & TECH. 2010;11(1):27-77. Blaming the Brain Steven K. Erickson* I. Introduction ............................................................................ 27 II. The Birth of Neurolaw .......................................................... 34 A. Brains Without Minds ................................................ 36 B. The Way of Cognitive Neuroscience ........................... 42 1. Reduction and Deduction ..................................... 46 2. The Life of the Brain ............................................. 50 III. Neurolaw’s Secret Ambition ................................................ 55 A. Making the Criminal, Civil ......................................... 57 B. Rise of the Control Tests ............................................. 65 C. Abolition of Agency ..................................................... 73 IV. Conclusion ............................................................................ 76 I. INTRODUCTION People are more than their brains. Legal and social traditions have long held people
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan 2015
    NS Strategic Plan 2015 Strategic Plan Creation of a Neuroscience Institute at UMass Amherst 1. Vision p3 2. Mission and Goals p3 3. Timelines and Deliverables for first Three Years p8 4. Stakeholders p13 5. SWOT Analysis p13 6. Differentiation Strategy p15 7. Contribution to Campus Mission p15 8. Peer and Aspirant Programs at other Institutions p16 9. Benefit of being an Institute Member to Faculty p16 10. Activities and Accomplishments to Date p16 11. Proposed Resource Needs for the Creation and Operation of INSI p16 12. Next Steps p17 Appendix A: Neuroscience Faculty (UMA and Five College Affiliates) p18 Appendix B: INSI Cluster Proposal Summaries p21 Appendix C: Full Cluster Proposals p23 INSI Steering Committee – 9/4/2015 Page 1 of 52 NS Strategic Plan 2015 Executive Summary In July 2014, the Dean of the College of Natural Sciences, in collaBoration with the VCRE, instituted a Neuroscience Strategic Planning Task Force and charged this task force with developing a strategic vision for neuroscience on the UMA campus, with Both immediate and longer-term oBjectives. MemBers of the task force represented each of the major suBstantive levels of current UMA neuroscience research (cellular/molecular; systems/circuitry; and Behavior/cognition), included assistant, associate, and full professors, and represented four departments in CNS and the School of Public Health and Health Sciences (SPHHS), as well as the Institute of Applied Life Sciences (IALS). The Neuroscience Strategic Planning Task Force has articulated a vision and operational plan for the creation and advancement of a new world-class Integrative Neuroscience Institute at UMA. The Institute will encompass research interests and eXperimental approaches contributed By a Broad range of departments and promote cross-departmental collaborations and close interactions with the Medical School (UMMS) – all leading to unique mechanistic insights into nervous system function in health and disease.
    [Show full text]