Question for Written Answer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Question for written answer E-002946/2021 to the Commission Rule 138 Diana Riba i Giner (Verts/ALE), Izaskun Bilbao Barandica (Renew), Jordi Solé (Verts/ALE), Ernest Urtasun (Verts/ALE), Miguel Urbán Crespo (The Left), Sira Rego (The Left), Idoia Villanueva Ruiz (The Left), Pernando Barrena Arza (The Left), Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó (NI), Antoni Comín i Oliveres (NI), Clara Ponsatí Obiols (NI) Subject: The Commission’s position on the CGPJ’s draft report on the Democratic Memory Law A draft report by the Spanish General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) claims that Spain’s Democratic Memory Law1 breaches freedom of ideology in seeking to close down foundations that have a long history of glorifying, denying and trivialising the crimes of the Franco dictatorship. Furthermore, the CGPJ maintains that the act of defending the Franco regime falls under freedom of expression and can be exercised without causing offence to the victims. This draft runs counter to the European Parliament resolution on the rise of neo-fascist violence in Europe, adopted in October 20182. To this day, tens of thousands of families are still searching through ditches and mass graves for the bodies of their fathers, mothers, grandfathers and grandmothers, victims of this criminal regime. 1. Does the Commission believe that the adoption of this report would contravene Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA3? 2. How many infringement procedures have been opened by the Commission for failure to comply with that framework decision? 3. Does the Commission believe that totalitarian ideologies such as Francoism, Nazism and Fascism fall under freedom of expression? 1 https://www.eldiario.es/politica/judicial-defiende-ley-memoria-vulnera-libertad-ideologica-pretender-cerrar- fundaciones-franquistas_1_7988562.html 2 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0428_EN.html 3 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32008F0913 PE693.479v01-00.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Votes of 29 June 2020
Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Results of roll-call votes of 29 June 2020 Table of Contents 1. CORRIGENDUM to Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources; (OJ L 328, 21 12 2018, p. 82) (position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 13 November 2018 with a view to the adoption of the above directive; (P8_TA(2018)0444)) (COM(2016)0767 – C8-0500/2016 – 2016/0382(COD)) - Adoption of corrigendum................................................................................................ 2 2. Establishing the Just Transition Fund - 2020/0006(COD) - Rapporteur: Jerzy Buzek ............................. 3 2.1 Vote on the compromise amendment CA2b .................................................................................. 3 2.2 Adoption of draft opinion ............................................................................................................... 4 3. A comprehensive European approach to energy storage - 2019/2189(INI) - Rapporteur: Claudia Gamon - Adoption of draft report .................................................................................................................. 5 Key to symbols: + (in favour), - (against), 0 (abstention). 1. CORRIGENDUM to Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources; (OJ L 328, 21 12 2018, p. 82) (position of the European Parliament adopted
[Show full text]
European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
[Show full text]
Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli
Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli, Since March, when the outbreak of COVID-19 intensified in Europe, the functioning of the European Parliament (EP) has changed dramatically, due to the sanitary measures applied. We understand the inevitability of the contingency plan, taking into account the need to prevent infection and the spread of the virus and to protect the health and lives of people. Six months later, the functioning of the EP is gradually returning to normal. However, there are services whose unavailability seriously impairs parliamentary work, namely the interpretation service. The European Union (EU) has 24 official languages and all deserve the same respect and treatment. We recognize that the number of languages available in committee meeting rooms has been increasing, but even so, more than half of the languages still have no interpretation. Multilingualism is a right enshrined in the Treaties that allows Members to express themselves in their own language. Now, that is not happening and we are concerned that the situation will continue, even taking into account the expected workflow in the commissions after these atypical six months. In this sense, we appeal, once again, to you, the President of the EP for the application of the letter and the spirit of the principle of multilingualism, finding solutions that respect this principle and that allow the use of any of the 24 official languages of the EU. The expression of each deputy in her/his own language is a priority so that there can be conditions to fully exercise the mandate for which she/he was elected and a condition of respect for the citizens who elected her/him.
[Show full text]
Urgent Call for Action: Making Use of the Conference on the Future of Europe for Reforming Or Abolishing the EURATOM Treaty
Urgent call for action: Making use of the Conference on the Future of Europe for reforming or abolishing the EURATOM Treaty Brussels, 6 October 2020 Dear Mrs. President of the EU Commission von der Leyen, Dear Mr. President of the European Council Michel, In your application speech for your current position held on 16 July 2019, you have passionately advocated a united, fair and equal Europe that is developing strong and ambitious solutions to the climate crisis. We welcome the commitment and energy you are putting into the implementation of the Green Deal. In order to achieve a carbon-neutral European Union until 2050 with a clean, resource efficient and competitive economy, you are focusing on fair and inclusive transitions for everyone. One of the main European Treaties, the EURATOM-Treaty, diametrically opposes your efforts. On 25 March 1957, the treaty for establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) was signed in Rome - at the same time as the treaty establishing the European Economic Community (EEC). The "Roman Treaties" are the foundation of today's European Union. While the EEC-Treaty has been reformed several times (EEC - EC - TFEU-Treaty), the EURATOM-Treaty has remained unchanged since 1957. Its main aim is the development of a powerful European nuclear industry. Nuclear energy "represents an essential resource for the development and invigoration of industry and will permit the advancement of the cause of peace" - up to this day. This also applies to 14 member states that have never operated nuclear power plants or that have decided to phase out nuclear energy as well as to those that reject the technology constitutionally.
[Show full text]
8.1.2020 A9-0054/4 Amendment 4 Idoia Villanueva Ruiz, Manuel
8.1.2020 A9-0054/4 Amendment 4 Idoia Villanueva Ruiz, Manuel Bompard, Eugenia Rodríguez Palop, Sira Rego, Manu Pineda, Emmanuel Maurel, Marisa Matias, José Gusmão, Mick Wallace, Anne-Sophie Pelletier, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Clare Daly on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Report A9-0054/2019 David McAllister Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (2019/2136(INI)) Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment Ja. whereas the foreign policy pursued by the United States of America, especially under the Trump Administration, has torn apart the foundations of multilateralism and the rule of law, and has escalated tensions that are driving the world and Europe to the brink of war; Or. en AM\1196065EN.docx PE643.453v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 8.1.2020 A9-0054/5 Amendment 5 Idoia Villanueva Ruiz, Manuel Bompard, Eugenia Rodríguez Palop, Sira Rego, Manu Pineda, Emmanuel Maurel, Marisa Matias, José Gusmão, Mick Wallace, Özlem Demirel, Anne-Sophie Pelletier, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Clare Daly on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Report A9-0054/2019 David McAllister Annual report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (2019/2136(INI)) Motion for a resolution Recital G Motion for a resolution Amendment G. whereas no single Member State is G. whereas no single Member State is able to tackle, on its own, any of the able to tackle, on its own, any of the challenges the European continent and its challenges the European continent and its close environment are facing today;
[Show full text]
Brussels, 24 February 2021
Brussels, 24 February 2021 Declaration from Members of the European Parliament to urge the Commission and Member States not to block the TRIPS waiver at the WTO and to support global access to COVID-19 vaccines We, Members of the European Parliament, urge the European Commission and the European Council to review their opposition to the TRIPS waiver proposal at the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which serves to enable greater access to affordable COVID-19 health technologies, including vaccines, in particular for developing and middle income countries. This call comes in view of the European Council meeting of 25 February 2021 and the crucial decision to be made by all Member States at the WTO General Council on 1-2 March 2021. Since the beginning of the pandemic, the need to ensure global open access to COVID-19 health technologies and to rapidly scale up their manufacturing and supply has been widely acknowledged. However, despite efforts and statements made by the European Commission and several heads of state in support of treating COVID-19 medical products as global public goods, this has not yet translated into actionable realities. In this context, the EU’s open opposition to the TRIPS waiver risks exacerbating a dangerous North-South divide when it comes to affordable access to COVID-19 diagnostics, personal protective equipment, treatments and vaccines. The WTO decision on a potential waiver offers a crucial and much-needed act of effective solidarity, as it is an important step towards increasing local production in partner countries and, ultimately, suppressing this pandemic on a global scale.
[Show full text]
15.10.2020 A8-0200/847 Amendment 847 Sira Rego, Manu Pineda on Behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Report A8-0200/2019 Peter Jahr Common
15.10.2020 A8-0200/847 Amendment 847 Sira Rego, Manu Pineda on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group Report A8-0200/2019 Peter Jahr Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD (COM(2018)0392 – C8-0248/2018 – 2018/0216(COD)) Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1) The Communication from the (1) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘The Future of Food the Regions entitled ‘The Future of Food and Farming’ of 29 November 2017 sets and Farming’ of 29 November 2017 sets out the challenges, objectives and out the challenges, objectives and orientations for the future Common orientations for the future Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) after 2020. Agricultural Policy (CAP) after 2020. These objectives include, inter alia, the These objectives include, inter alia, the need for the CAP to be more result-driven, need for the CAP to be more result-driven, to boost modernisation and sustainability, to boost modernisation and sustainability, including the economic, social, including the economic, social, environmental and climate sustainability of demographic, environmental and climate the agricultural, forestry and rural areas, sustainability of the agricultural, forestry and to help reducing the Union legislation- and rural areas, and to help reducing the related administrative burden for Union legislation-related administrative beneficiaries.
[Show full text]
Brussels, 11Th of November 2020 Chairman of the Justice and Home Affairs Council Dear Minister Seehofer, Two Months Ago, The
Brussels, 11th of November 2020 Chairman of the Justice and Home Affairs Council Dear Minister Seehofer, Two months ago, the fire in Moria completely destroyed the camp, leaving more than 12,000 asylum seekers without shelter. Whilst responding to urgent needs warranted setting up a temporary camp on Lesbos, we now risk seeing this temporary solution turning into a permanent one. But, based on the account of refugees themselves and experienced service providers, the conditions in the new camp are worse than the conditions in Moria. Almost 8,000 people – mostly families with children – have been forced to live in tents and face dire living conditions. Rapid protection assessments1 carried out at the end of September identified numerous risks to the people living in the camp. These include limited access to food with reports of residents fainting out of hunger, inadequate measures against Covid-19 as well as no drainage nor sewerage system on site, with only one toilet being shared by twenty people and no access for persons with physical disabilities. Due to a lack of running water, residents are forced to wash themselves in the sea – this raises a risk to children who could drown. This lack of sanitary facilities coupled with the insufficient lighting exposes women to an increased risk of sexual and gender-based violence. Residents are unable to access health services or legal aid. Children have no access to education and truly risk becoming a lost generation. We are convinced that the camp, located by the beach, will not withstand the adverse weather conditions, such as strong wind and rain, which are typical for the season.
[Show full text]
Brussels, 4 June 2020 Idoia Villanueva Ruiz European Parliament Bât
Brussels, 4 june 2020 Idoia Villanueva Ruiz European Parliament Bât. Willy Brandt 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60 B-1047 Brussels Ibán García del Blanco Parlement Européen Bât. Altiero Spinelli 60, rue Wiertz / Wiertzstraat 60 B-1047 Bruxelles/Brussels Iván Duque, President of the Republic of Colombia Cra. 8 ## 7 - 26, Bogotá, Cundinamarca, Colombia [email protected] Dear President Iván Duque, Like the European Union, Colombia is confronting the challenges of the Covid19 pandemic. Given the existing relationship of cooperation between the EU and Colombia, we have been closely following the situation of human rights and peace in the country. In light of this situation, we would like to add our voices to the numerous and explicit messages of concern raised by relevant Colombian personalities from different political groups. We would like to express our most serious concerns about recent news related to the existence of intelligence files, which reportedly appear to be the result of illegal surveillance activities, carried out by the Colombian National Army, against at least 130 people. These people include journalists, researchers, lawyers and human rights defenders, including for example members of the José Alvear Restrepo Lawyers’ Collective (CCAJAR), as well as high court judges, members of your government and deputies from opposition political parties. We are also concerned that other human rights organisations like the Inter-Church Justice and Peace Commission report the existence of other databases, which include information about other people, obtained via illegal military intelligence activities. We are seriously concerned about what these events reveal about defence policy and military doctrines within the Colombian Armed Forces, especially when viewed alongside other events which took place in 2019 (such as the existence of military directives putting the civilian population at risk of becoming the victims of extrajudicial killings or the armed conflict).
[Show full text]
Opinion on the Council Decision on the Conclusion of the Agreement on the Withdrawal Of
European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Petitions The Chair 21.1.2020 Mr Antonio Tajani Chair Committee on Constitutional Affairs BRUSSELS Subject: Opinion on the Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (2018/0427(NLE)) Dear Mr. Chair, I am writing to you in connection with your Committee’s consent on the Council Decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (2018/0427(NLE)). At its meeting on 21 January 2020, the Committee on Petitions adopted an opinion in the form of a letter, which I am pleased to submit to you hereby. At that meeting1, the Committee on Petitions decided to call on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible for the file, to recommend that Parliament give its consent to the Council Decision. Art 227 TFEU confers the Right to Petition the European Parliament to all EU citizens and all companies or individuals resident in EU territory. This means that following Brexit, UK citizens residing in the UK will no longer enjoy the right to participate in the European Citizens’ Initiative after 31 January, and lose the right to petition the EP and the right to apply to the Ombudsman after the end of the transition period (31 December). EU citizens in the UK will maintain all those rights whereas UK citizens
[Show full text]
En En Interim Report
European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting A9-0138/2020 20.7.2020 INTERIM REPORT on the proposal for a Council decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law (COM(2017)0835 – 2017/0360R(NLE)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Juan Fernando López Aguilar RR\1210506EN.docx PE650.665v03-00 EN United in diversityEN PR_Consent_Interim CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION.............................................3 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ............................................................................................24 ANNEX: LIST OF ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT..................................................................................................................29 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY.30 PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ...................................................................38 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ....................................39 PE650.665v03-00 2/39 RR\1210506EN.docx EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on the proposal for a Council decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law (COM(2017)0835 – 2017/0360R(NLE)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2017)0835), – having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 2 and Article 7(1) thereof,
[Show full text]
Open Letter to President Sassoli on the Violation of the European Acquis on Historical Memory in the European Parliament
OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT SASSOLI ON THE VIOLATION OF THE EUROPEAN ACQUIS ON HISTORICAL MEMORY IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Dear Mr. President: We, the undersigned MEPs and former MEPs of the European Parliament Historical Remembrance Group, show our absolute rejection against the pro-Franco message published last week by MEP Hermann Tertsch, from the far right and neo-Francoist VOX party. We consider that the email does not comply with the community acquis on democratic memory and the protection of victims and that it comes from a party that does not condemn Francoism, that participates in acts of glorification and trivialization of this dictatorship. The declaration is contrary to numerous pronouncements of this Parliament on memory and fundamental rights, to the acquis on which the Community programme Europe for Citizens is based and to repeated pronouncements against the impunity of crimes committed in Europe by totalitarian regimes and the trivialisation of their crimes signed by international organisations, notably the United Nations or the Council of Europe. In particular, it is a flagrant violation of, among other provisions, Council Decision 2007/126/JHA; Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA; Directive 2012/29/EU on victims' rights; Article 2(3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It even opposes Article 47 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. The message sent last week would be punished as a crime in Germany or Italy if it referred to Hitler or Mussolini. In Spain, because of inadequate application of the Community acquis on memory, neo-Francoism operates with total impunity, this is one of the aspects that the new draft of the Memory Law, criticized by MEP Hermann Terstch, aims at correcting.
[Show full text]