Part 2: the Scientific Data Relative to the Biblical Teaching of Genesis 1-11

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Part 2: the Scientific Data Relative to the Biblical Teaching of Genesis 1-11 441 Part 2: The scientific data relative to the Biblical teaching of Genesis 1-11. Chapter 1: General Theology of Scientific Evidences for the Creator & Bible: a] “God” hath “left not himself without witness” (Acts 14:15,17). b] Biblical creation model to be scientifically compared and contrasted with the Book of Nature. Chapter 2: “The creation of the world” (Rom. 1:20): the generally united old earth creationist school. a]i] Cosmology (The First Cause): “In the beginning God created” (Gen. 1:1), the universe & how at the time of the Big Bang God made matter out of nothing at all! a]ii] Cosmology (The First Cause): The “creation” claims of the world’s largest Infidel religion, Mohammedanism, as found in the Koran; and also the “creation” claims of the world’s two largest heathen religions, Buddhism & Hinduism; are not scientific. b] Teleology (Design): i] “God created the heaven and the earth” (Gen. 1:1) & the Anthropic Principle. ii] “In the beginning God” (Gen. 1:1): The Anthropic Principle subject to the Theocentric Principle (Isa. 46:9,10). iii] “God created … the earth” (Gen. 1:1): Earth’s Solar System. iv] “God created … the earth” (Gen. 1:1): Earth-Sun-Moon system. v] “God created … the earth” (Gen. 1:1) – but how “old” is the “old … earth” (Ps. 102:25)? Chapter 3: “God created … the earth” (Gen. 1:1): uniformitarianism & catastrophism. a] From Xenophanes to William Hutton. b] Adam Sedgwick (old earth creationist) verses Charles Lyell (anti- supernaturalist uniformitarianism). c] Thomas Chalmers (old earth creationist) verses Charles Lyell’s type of anti-supernaturalist uniformitarianism. d] William Whewell (old earth creationist) verses Charles Lyell (anti- supernaturalist uniformitarianism). e] George Cuvier et al (old earth creationist): uniformitarianism & catastrophism in the “worlds” or “ages” (Heb. 1:2; 11:3) of Gen. 1:1 & 2:4; creation, not macroevolution – mind the gap. f] The generally united Gap School view: filling in the blanks in the “worlds” or “ages” of multiple “generations” of Earth’s history in Gen. 2:4; Heb. 1:2; 11:3, following the creation of the temporal and spiritual heavens, from the Pregeological World of c. 4.6 billion B.C. to the start of the Last Ice Age c. 68,000 B.C.; creation, not macroevolution – mind the gap. 442 Chapter 4: Teleology (Design): “God created” (Gen. 1:1): Biological life forms: creation, not macroevolution – mind the gap. a] The Earth is prepared for more complex biological life-forms. b] Darwin Undone on admission of joint founding father of Darwin- Wallace Theory of Natural Selection, Alfred Wallace. c] The generally United Creationist School view on genetics of both old earth and young earth creationists: scientific laws of genetics support creation and refute macroevolutionary theory. i] The origins of life, and also genetic complexity of even the most simple cells or life-forms, points to a Creator God. ii] Convergence factors point to creation, not macroevolution: What came first, the chicken or the egg? iii] The mutation spiral is downwards, not upwards: the issue of no credible source for the new genetic material of new creatures from naturalistic processes indicating that creatures were created by God at the level of genus or below. iv] Old Earth Creationist Edward Blyth discovers the law of natural selection long before Darwin uses and abuses this law of nature. v] Subspeciation or Speciation i.e., either Theistic Microevolution within a genetically rich genus or below created by God or Natural Selection Microevolution within a genetically rich genus or below created by God is inside of Creationism; but speciation with alleged “natural process new genetic material” macroevolution beyond a genus is an anti-creation theory of evolution. vi] Where creationists may differ: Subspeciation & Speciation – How did varieties within species come about? What about genetically close brother species such as “horse” (Ps. 32:9) + “ass” (Gen. 36:24) = hybrid “mule” (Gen. 36:24; Ps. 32:9) etc.? vii] Laws of genetics critique Darwinian macroevolutionists. Chapter 5: The fossil record: creation, not macroevolution – mind the gap. a] The generally United Creationist School recognizes that the absence of transitional fossils flaws macroevolutionary theory. b] The Gap between the first two verses of Genesis & the Fourth Day. c] A scientific critique of “flood geology”: “What about the Young Earth ‘Flood Geology’ Theory that originated with George McCready Price, a cult member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, which says the earth is 6,000-10,000 years old as ‘confirmed’ by the visions of their cult prophetess Ellen White?” d] A scientific critique of the Global Earth Gap School’s global pre-Adamite flood & following global six day creation. 443 i] “What about the view that ‘the global catastrophe’ of Gen. 1:2 was the Last Ice, ending with the Holocene c. 8,000 B.C.?” ii] “What about godly Global Earth Gap Schoolmen?, And for that matter, What about godly Young Earth Schoolmen?” iii] “Landing the Gap School jet plane.” e] Common design patterns (homology) point to a monotheistic Creator, not as Darwinists claim to macroevolution: the generally united creationist school. f] Darwinian evolutionists stand back to back, walk out 10 paces, & then turn to shoot each other to pieces - The theory of slow gradual macroevolution which is ruled out by both the laws of genetics and the absence of credible transitional fossil records VERSUS the “jumping-box theory” of “punctuated equilibrium” which is ruled out by the laws of genetics: the generally united creationist school. Chapter 6: The creation of man: creation, not macroevolution – mind the gap. a] Human Anatomy: the generally united creationist school. b] Spotting the wood from the trees - the similarities of homology in promisians, simians, satyr beasts, & men; & the generally united creationist school. c] Soul-talk: i] Distinguishing man from animals - the soul gives man a god focus & capacity for religious belief in the supernatural; and conscience morality seen in a moral code. ii] A revised taxonomy for primates must replace the erroneous twofold taxonomy used for primates. iii] Distinguishing Satyr Beasts & Man, the Apers & Adamites: A clean cut – like putting a knife through butter. A] Men have souls, animals do not: the APER (African Pre-Edenic Race). B] An Aper Case Study: Australia. C] People “going ape” over the Apers. iv] Where creationists do differ: Subspeciation with respect to man. A] Where are the Adamites in the fossil record? B] Did God create diverse human races? A short preliminary discussion. d] The illusive search for Y chromosome Adam (or Noah) & Mitochondrial Eve: “I know that my genes have ancestors back to Adam: whereas paleontologists can only speculate that fossils they find had descendants.” e] Perforated bones: “Blowing the bone whistle” on “anthropologists” playing loony tunes on “bone flutes.” f] Frustrated Darwinian Macroevolutionists use fraudulent “transitional fossils” against the generally United Creationist School. 444 Chapter 7: The soul linked to Teleology, Ontology, Conscience Morality, & Ethnology: the generally united creationist school. a] Teleology (Design): Man as Body and Soul (Gen. 2:7; Matt. 10:28; I Cor. 15:45). b] Ontology. c] Conscience Morality. d] Ethnological universal belief in the supernatural. i] The argument of Ethnology. ii] Protestant Missionary work among the Fuegians & Darwin’s claim the pre-Christianized Fuegians were atheists. e] The five arguments from godly reason considered together. Chapter 8: Christian experience. Chapter 9: Why the science of astronomy requires that the six 24 hour creation days of Gen. 1:2b-2:3 were on a local earth not a global earth. a] The science of astronomy requires a local Edenic creation in Gen. 1:2b-2:3. b] Sometime Anglican & sometime Presbyterian Westminster Divine, John Lightfoot, rejects the Flat Earth Theory. c] Calculating an upper end size for the local Edenic creation in Gen. 1:2b-2:3. Chapter 10: Why the science of linguistics for Days 5 & 6 (Gen. 1:20,21,24,25 ) & Gen. 6-9, coupled with the size of Noah’s Ark (Gen. 6:15,16), requires that Gen. 1:2b-2:3 refers to the creation of a local Edenic World (Gen. 2:8,11-14). a] Young Earth Creationist’s theory of “baraminology” animal “kinds” on Days 5 & 6 ruled out by the science of linguistics. b] Old Earth Creationist Hugh Ross’s theory of only “birds and mammals” on Days 5 & 6 ruled out by the science of linguistics. c] The science of linguistics for Days 5 & 6 & Gen. 6-9, coupled with the size limitations imposed by Noah’s Ark, requires the Gen. 1:2b-2:3 creation is a local heaven and local earth in a local world of Eden. Chapter 11: Paradise Lost: So Where Was Eden & How local is local or how small is small? The incomplete fossil record. a] Different models agree: Eden in or near, Mesopotamia. b] Adam’s dates give geological parameters. c] The Edenic rivers identify an area now under the Persian Gulf. d] The size of Noah’s Ark imposes limits on the size of Eden. 445 e] What about the “raven” & the “dove” (Gen. 8:7-12)? f] The incomplete fossil record: Is there a flood deposit for Noah’s Flood in the Land of Eden? g] The Greek Septuagint, Eden, & the Promised Land. Chapter 12: Inside-Outside Distinction: Everything was rosy in the Garden - A thorny issue, What about death, thorns, & thistles? a] General. b] Outside Eden: The King’s Royal Parklands Out-of-bounds to man. c] The creatures inside Eden: What are the “kinds” created on the 3rd, 5th, and 6th days? d] What got cursed in Gen. 3? e] Outside Eden: God’s creatures of the King’s Royal Parklands.
Recommended publications
  • 1991 ADMINISTRATION BOARD of DIRECTORS President Dr
    FEB 91 THE GEOLOGICAL NEWSLETTER I GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE OREGON COUNTRY I .. GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Non-Profit Org. OF THE OREGON COUNTRY U.S. POSTAGE P.O. BOX 907 PAID Portland, Oregon PORTLAND, OR 97207 Permit No. 999 \ 1Ett£ 13" .\. J!l CIJ" \ \. GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE OREGON COUNTRY 1990-1991 ADMINISTRATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS President Dr. Ruth Keen 222-1430 Directors 4138 SW 4th Ave Donald Barr (3 years) 246-2785 Portland, OR 97201 Peter E. Baer (2 years) 661-7995 Vice President Charlene Holzwarth (1 year) 284-3444 Dr. Walter Sunderland 625-6840 Immediate Past Presidents 7610 NE Earlwood Rd. Rosemary Kenney 221-0757 Newberg, OR 97132. Joline Robustelli 223-2852 Secretary Cecelia Crater 235-5158 THE GEOLOGICAL NEWSLETTER 3823 SE lOth Editor: Sandra Anderson 775-5538 Portland, OR 97202 Calendar: Joline Robustelli 223-2852 Treasurer Business Mgr. Joline Robustelli 223-2852 Archie Strong 244-1488 Assist: Cecelia Crater 235-5158 6923 SW 2nd Ave Portland, OR 97219 ACTIVITIES CHAIRS Calligrapher Properties and PA System .. Wallace R. McClung 637-3834 (Luncheon) Donald Botteron 245-6251 Field Trips (Evening) Walter A. Sunderland 625-6840 Alta B. Fosback 641-6323 Publications Charlene Holzwarth 284-3444 Margaret Steere 246-1670 Geology Seminars Publicity Margaret Steere 246-1670 Roberta L. Walter 235 -3579 Historian Refreshments Phyllis G. Bonebrake 289-8597 (Friday Evening) Hospitality Donald and Betty Turner 246-3192 (Luncheon) Margaret Fink 289-0188 (Geology Seminars) (Evening) Gale Rankin and Freda and Virgil Scott 771-3646 Manuel Boyes 223-6784 Telephone Library: Frances Rusche 6_54-5975 Cecelia Crater 235-5158 Esther Kennedy -287-3091 Volunteer Speakers Bureau Lois Sato 654-7671 Robert Richmond 282-3817 Past Presidents Panel Annual Banquet Rosemary Kenney 221-0757 Esther Kennedy 287-3091 Programs Gale Rankin 223-6784 (Luncheon) Helen E.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Team
    Paper No. : 03 Archaeological Anthropology Module : 24 Geological Time Scale Development Team Principal Investigator Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Paper Coordinator Dr. Manoj Kumar Singh Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Prof. Mani Babu, Content Writer Department of Anthropology, Manipur University Content Reviewer Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi 1 Archaeological Anthropology Anthropology Geological Time Scale Description of Module Subject Name Anthropology Paper Name 03 Archaeological Anthropology Module Name/Title Geological Time Scale Module Id 24 2 Archaeological Anthropology Anthropology Geological Time Scale Table of contents: 1. Introduction 2. Early Principles Behind Geologic Time 3. Construction Of Geologic Time Scale (GTS) 4. The Time Scale Creator 5. Recognizing Geologic Stages 6. Divisions Of Geologic Time 6.1 Proterozoic Or Precambrian Eon 6.2 The Palaozoic Era 6.3 The Mesozoic Era 6.4 The Cenozoic Era Learning outcomes To know about the geological time scale To understand the early Principles Behind Geologic Time To know about the construction Of Geologic Time Scale (GTS) To know and understand its divisions 3 Archaeological Anthropology Anthropology Geological Time Scale 1. Introduction The geography and landscape of a region are always changing. Geological research works reveal that the mountains and valleys that surround us or the position of the coastline today have not always been as we know them now. The land that we
    [Show full text]
  • A Template for an Improved Rock-Based Subdivision of the Pre-Cryogenian Timescale
    Downloaded from http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 Perspective Journal of the Geological Society Published Online First https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2020-222 A template for an improved rock-based subdivision of the pre-Cryogenian timescale Graham A. Shields1*, Robin A. Strachan2, Susannah M. Porter3, Galen P. Halverson4, Francis A. Macdonald3, Kenneth A. Plumb5, Carlos J. de Alvarenga6, Dhiraj M. Banerjee7, Andrey Bekker8, Wouter Bleeker9, Alexander Brasier10, Partha P. Chakraborty7, Alan S. Collins11, Kent Condie12, Kaushik Das13, David A. D. Evans14, Richard Ernst15,16, Anthony E. Fallick17, Hartwig Frimmel18, Reinhardt Fuck6, Paul F. Hoffman19,20, Balz S. Kamber21, Anton B. Kuznetsov22, Ross N. Mitchell23, Daniel G. Poiré24, Simon W. Poulton25, Robert Riding26, Mukund Sharma27, Craig Storey2, Eva Stueeken28, Rosalie Tostevin29, Elizabeth Turner30, Shuhai Xiao31, Shuanhong Zhang32, Ying Zhou1 and Maoyan Zhu33 1 Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK 2 School of the Environment, Geography and Geosciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK 3 Department of Earth Science, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA 4 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada 5 Geoscience Australia (retired), Canberra, Australia 6 Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil 7 Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India 8 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside,
    [Show full text]
  • The Geological Origins of the Oracle at Delphi, Greece1 J.Z
    The Geological Origins of the Oracle at Delphi, Greece1 J.Z. DE BOER Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, USA J.R. HALE College of Arts & Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA ncient authors from Plato to Pausanias geological setting of the sanctuary. According have left descriptions of Delphi’s to a number of Greek and Roman authorities, Aoracle and its mantic sessions. The the women who spoke the prophecies at latter were interpreted as events in which the Delphi sat on a tripod that spanned a cleft Pythia (priestess) placed herself on a tripod over or fissure in the rock within the temple of a cleft (fissure) in the ground below the Apollo Apollo. Vapours rose from this chasm into temple. Here she inhaled a vapour rising from the inner sanctum or adyton, where they the cleft, and became inspired with the power of intoxicated the priestess and inspired her prophecy. French archaeologists who excavated prophecies. The ancient testimonies have the oracle site at the turn of the century reported been challenged during the past half- no evidence of either fissures or gaseous emissions century, as modern archaeologists failed to and concluded that the ancient accounts were locate any cleft or source of vapours within myths. As a result, modern classical scholars the foundations of the ruined temple and and many archaeologists reject the ancient therefore concluded that the ancient sources testimonies concerning the mantic sessions and must have been in error. However, a recent their geological origin. geological study of the sanctuary and adjacent However, the geological conditions at the areas has shown that the preconditions for oracle site do not a priori exclude the early the emission of intoxicating fumes are indeed accounts.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene - History of Earth's Climate
    Pleistocene - History of Earth's climate http://www.dandebat.dk/eng-klima5.htm History of Earth's Climate 5. - Cenozoic II - Pleistocene Home DH-Debate 4. Tertiary Introduction - The Pleistocene Ice Ages - The climate in the ice-free part of the World - During Last Glacial Maximum, the World became cold and 6. End of Pleistocene dusty - Temperature and CO2 - Milankovic Astronomical Climate Theory - Interglacials and other warm Periods - The Super volcano Toba - Links og literature Introduction Pleistocene is the period in Earth's history that we commonly refer to as the Ice Age. Through much of this period, the Earth's northern and southern regions were covered by kilometer thick glaciers. It is important to recognize that the Pleistocene was a series of real ice ages, separated by relatively short interglacial periods. The Pleistocene started 2.6 million years ago and lasted until the termination of the Weichsel glaciation about 11,711 years ago. Timeline of Earth's geological periods. Time progresses from right to left. The glowing inferno just after Earth was formed is named Hadean. In Archean water condensed and an atmosphere of nitrogen and methane was formed together with the first rocks that we know about. In Proterozoic cyano bacteria produced oxygen, which oxidized iron and methane, in the end of the period life emerged on the seabed. Phanerozoic represents the era in which there have been visible tangible life. It is divided in Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic. Paleozoic was the period of early life. Mesozoic was the time of the dinosaurs, and Cenozoic is the era of mammals, which latter further is divided into Tertiary and Quaternary.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Falls in Delphi Archaeological Site, in Greece
    Rockfalls occurred in the archaeological site of Delphi, Greece B. Christaras Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Geology, Lab. of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, e-mail: [email protected] K. Vouvalidis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Geology, Dept. of Physical & Environmental Geography, e-mail: [email protected] M. - F. Papakonstantinou Ministry of Culture, Chief Archaeologist of I’ Ephorate of Prehistoric and Classical Antiquities, Delphi, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: In the present investigation, the safety of the northern slope of Delphi’s archaeological site in Greece was investigated against rockfalls. The area consists of limestone lying over flysch. Three possible rockfall rebound tracks, passing through the ancient stadium, and the theatre, were studied for different rock dimensions and tracks resulting that the more dangerous and difficult in retention rockfall track is that which crosses the stadium. The use of barriers was investigated accepting, finally, that a 2.5m-high metallic barrier could be installed along the northern steep slope for the protection of the archaeological site. KEY WORDS: ROCKFALLS, DELPHI, SLOP STABILITY, RESTRAINING BARRIERES 1. INTRODUCTION In the middle of September 2009, prolonged rainfall activated rockfalls from the upper sections of the archaeological site’s northern slope and fall downslope, out of the enclosure wall of the Sanctuary of Apollo, north of the Portico of Attalus. Rockfalls also occur in the stadium from 2003 onwards (Figure 1). The slope, consisting of limestone, is steep and heavily broken as a result of the existing tectonics. The rockfalls created dangerous conditions in the archaeological site regarding the safety of tourists, the staff of the ephorate and the protection of the monuments.
    [Show full text]
  • Titanis Walleri: Bones of Contention
    Bull. Fla. Mus. Nat. Hist. (2005) 45(4): 201-229 201 TITANIS WALLERI: BONES OF CONTENTION Gina C. Gould1 and Irvy R. Quitmyer2 Titanis walleri, one of the largest and possibly the last surviving member of the otherwise South American Phorusrhacidae is re- considered in light of all available data. The only verified phorusrhacid recovered in North America, Titanis was believed to exhibit a forward-extending arm with a flexible claw instead of a traditional bird wing like the other members of this extinct group. Our review of the already described and undescribed Titanis material housed at the Florida Museum of Natural History suggest that Titanis: (1) was like other phorusrhacids in sporting small, ineffectual ratite-like wings; (2) was among the tallest of the known phorusrhacids; and (3) is the last known member of its lineage. Hypotheses of its range extending into the Pleistocene of Texas are challenged, and herein Titanis is presumed to have suffered the same fate of many other Pliocene migrants of the Great American Interchange: extinction prior to the Pleistocene. Key Words: Phorusrhacidae; Great American Biotic Interchange; Florida; Pliocene; Titanis INTRODUCTION men on the tarsometatarsus, these specimens were as- Titanis walleri (Brodkorb 1963), more commonly known signed to the Family Phorusrhacidae (Brodkorb 1963) as the North American ‘Terror Bird’, is one of the larg- and named after both a Titan Goddess from Greek my- est known phorusrhacids, an extinct group of flightless thology and Benjamin Waller, the discoverer of the fos- carnivorous birds from the Tertiary of South America, sils (Zimmer 1997). Since then, isolated Titanis mate- and most likely, the last known member of its lineage rial has been recovered from three other localities in (Brodkorb 1967; Tonni 1980; Marshall 1994; Alvarenga Florida (Table 1; Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Christian Theology 1
    _____________________________________________________________________________________ Faculty Guide Investigating Christian Theology 1 Clergy Development Church of the Nazarene Kansas City, Missouri 816-999-7000 ext. 2468; 800-306-7651 (USA) 2002 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Christian Theology 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________ Copyright ©2002 Nazarene Publishing House, Kansas City, MO USA. Created by Church of the Nazarene Clergy Development, Kansas City, MO USA. All rights reserved. All scripture quotations except where otherwise noted are from the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) of the Bible, copyright 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA. All rights reserved. Used by permission. NASB: From the American Standard Bible (NASB), copyright the Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 973, 1977, 1995. Used by permission. NIV: From the Holy Bible, New International Version (NIV). Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by the International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved. Notice to educational providers: This is a contract. By using these materials you accept all the terms and conditions of this agreement. This agreement covers all Faculty Guides, Student Guides and instructional resources included in this Module. Upon your acceptance of this Agreement, Clergy Development grants to you a nonexclusive license to use these curricular materials provided that you agree to the following: 1. Use of the Modules. • You may distribute this Module in electronic form to students or other educational providers. • You may make and distribute electronic or paper copies to students for the purpose of instruction, as long as each copy contains this Agreement and the same copyright and other proprietary notices pertaining to the Module.
    [Show full text]
  • GLIMPSES of the GOD-MAN MEHER BABA Volume 1 (1943-1948)
    GLIMPSES OF THE GOD-MAN MEHER BABA Volume 1 (1943-1948) By Bal Natu An Avatar Meher Baba Trust eBook June 2011 Copyright © 1977 by Bal Natu Source: This eBook reproduces the original edition of Glimpses of the God-Man, Meher Baba, Volume1, published by Sufism Reoriented (Walnut Creek, California) in 1977. eBooks at the Avatar Meher Baba Trust Web Site The Avatar Meher Baba Trust’s eBooks aspire to be textually exact though non-facsimile reproductions of published books, journals and articles. With the consent of the copyright holders, these online editions are being made available through the Avatar Meher Baba Trust’s web site, for the research needs of Meher Baba’s lovers and the general public around the world. Again, the eBooks reproduce the text, though not the exact visual likeness, of the original publications. They have been created through a process of scanning the original pages, running these scans through optical character recognition (OCR) software, reflowing the new text, and proofreading it. Except in rare cases where we specify otherwise, the texts that you will find here correspond, page for page, with those of the original publications: in other words, page citations reliably correspond to those of the source books. But in other respects—such as lineation and font—the page designs differ. Our purpose is to provide digital texts that are more readily downloadable and searchable than photo facsimile images of the originals would have been. Moreover, they are often much more readable, especially in the case of older books, whose discoloration and deteriorated condition often makes them partly illegible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gospel Project President, Lifeway Research
    CHRONOLOGICAL A.D. B.C. Volume 1 FALL 2015: Leader Guide ESV Ed Stetzer General Editor Trevin Wax Managing Editor God’s Word to You A Summary of the Bible In the beginning, the all-powerful, personal God created the universe. This God created human beings in His image to live joyfully in His presence, in humble submission to His gracious authority. But all of us have rebelled against God and, in consequence, must suffer the punishment of our rebellion: physical death and the wrath of God. Thankfully, God initiated a rescue plan, which began with His choosing the nation of Israel to display His glory in a fallen world. The Bible describes how God acted mightily on Israel’s behalf, rescuing His people from slavery and then giving them His holy law. But God’s people—like all of us—failed to rightly reflect the glory of God. Then, in the fullness of time, in the Person of Jesus Christ, God Himself came to renew the world and restore His people. Jesus perfectly obeyed the law given to Israel. Though innocent, He suffered the consequences of human rebellion by His death on a cross. But three days later, God raised Him from the dead. Now the church of Jesus Christ has been commissioned by God to take the news of Christ’s work to the world. Empowered by God’s Spirit, the church calls all people everywhere to repent of sin and to trust in Christ alone for our forgiveness. Repentance and faith restores our relationship with God and results in a life of ongoing transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • D. Palaeozoological Research
    Eiszeitalter u. Gegenwart Band 23/24 Seite 333-339 Öhringen/Württ., 15. Oktober 1973 D. Palaeozoological Research by HORST REMY, Bonn translated by U. BUREK, S. CHRULEV and R. THOMAS, Tübingen 1. Molluscs Comprehensive studies of Pleistocene land- and freshwater molluscs have so far been largely restricted to the faunas of interglacial and Würmian glacial deposits, and to the history of postglacial faunas. ANT has reconstructed the postglacial history of changes in landsnail distributions in NW-Germany and Westphalia (ANT 1963a, 1967). The present day fauna consists of a preexisting fauna ("Urfauna") together with postglacial immi­ grants. The elements of the "Urfauna" are eurythermal species, which were already living in NW-Germany during Würm Glaciation. These species comprise about 24 °/o of the present day fauna. In the South German periglacial region this portion is rather higher. Microclimatic conditions must have been more favourable in this region, presumably because the influence of the alpine ice mass was not as strong as that of the continental ice sheet to the north. There were many ecological niches whose local climates were more favourable for the survival of such species. Along the south coast of England, SW of the land connection with the continent, several migrant species survived (Atlanto-Britannic Fauna). In the forested region west of the Urals, the species wich today constitute the Siberio-Asiatic Fauna survived, while the immigrant species of the Mediterranean Fauna survived on the E-coast of Spain, on the W-coast of Italy and SE-Europe. It is not yet certain where some of the immigrant species lived during the glaciation; possibly these forms survived the ice age in S-Germany and the adjoining regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Cypris 2016-2017
    CYPRIS 2016-2017 Illustrations courtesy of David Siveter For the upper image of the Silurian pentastomid crustacean Invavita piratica on the ostracod Nymphateline gravida Siveter et al., 2007. Siveter, David J., D.E.G. Briggs, Derek J. Siveter, and M.D. Sutton. 2015. A 425-million-year- old Silurian pentastomid parasitic on ostracods. Current Biology 23: 1-6. For the lower image of the Silurian ostracod Pauline avibella Siveter et al., 2012. Siveter, David J., D.E.G. Briggs, Derek J. Siveter, M.D. Sutton, and S.C. Joomun. 2013. A Silurian myodocope with preserved soft-parts: cautioning the interpretation of the shell-based ostracod record. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 280 20122664. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2012.2664 (published online 12 December 2012). Watermark courtesy of Carin Shinn. Table of Contents List of Correspondents Research Activities Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil China Czech Republic Estonia France Germany Iceland Israel Italy Japan Luxembourg New Zealand Romania Russia Serbia Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Spain Switzerland Thailand Tunisia United Kingdom United States Meetings Requests Special Publications Research Notes Photographs and Drawings Techniques and Methods Awards New Taxa Funding Opportunities Obituaries Horst Blumenstengel Richard Forester Franz Goerlich Roger Kaesler Eugen Kempf Louis Kornicker Henri Oertli Iraja Damiani Pinto Evgenii Schornikov Michael Schudack Ian Slipper Robin Whatley Papers and Abstracts (2015-2007) 2016 2017 In press Addresses Figure courtesy of Francesco Versino,
    [Show full text]