Unit 8: Duties, Liabilities and Protection of Bankers in Handling Bills of Exchange

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unit 8: Duties, Liabilities and Protection of Bankers in Handling Bills of Exchange Unit 8: Duties, Liabilities and Protection of Bankers in Handling Bills of Exchange Payment of Cheques The legal position of a bank paying a cheque may be considered by looking at the contract of the bank with its customer; and the provisions of the Bills of Exchange Act Cap. 68 The legal relationships involving the paying bank may include: • That with its customer • That with some remote true owner of the cheque • That with the collecting bank Item (iii) is covered in Unit 9. Item (i) and (ii) relates to the contract the bank has with its customer as well as the statutory provisions in the BEA. The banker therefore needs to exercise a reasonable degree of care and skill when conducting its customer’s account. The cheque must be validly signed in order for the bank to have evidence of its customer’s authority (Catlin v Cyprus Finance Corporation London Ltd (1983)) to pay, (and in order for it to be covered by the BEA). By s. 2(4)a of the BEA, a cheque need not be dated at all. The paying bank has a right to insert a date under s. 19(1), although in practice, it is safer for the bank to return the cheque unpaid, stating ‘not dated’. By s.12 (2) of the BEA, a post-dated cheque is within the legal definition of a cheque as there is no contradiction with it being payable on demand – Royal Bank of Scotland v Tottenham (1894). Banks in practice do not honour cheques dated more than six months in the past marking them as ‘stale’, and whereas a case may be brought against the bank for dishonouring its customer’s instructions, this would be seen to be an implied term of the Banker/customer contract not to pay six months after date. In order to come within the definition, a cheque must be payable for a sum certain in money. It would be up to normal practice not to pay when the amount is stated in figures or words only. However, a discrepancy between the amount stated in words and figures can be dealt with in the following ways: • Return the cheque as an ambiguous order • Pay according to the words relying on s.8(1)d of the BEA. Forgery of a Drawer’s Signature. If the customer’s signature on a cheque is forged, the bank has no authority to pay and, thus, will be unable to debit the customer’s account. It makes no difference that the forgery could not be detected. By s.23 of the BEA, a forged drawer’s signature is inoperative. In Tai Hing Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank (1986) discussed in 1.7 of this module, the bank lost the case on strength that the signatures on the paid cheques were forged, although the bank argued that the customer owed a duty to the bank to take care of its cheque books and to inspect its bank statements. There is a possibility of a person knowing that his signature on a cheque has been forged, but leads others to believe that his signature is genuine. In such a situation, he will be estopped from denying the genuineness of the signature and will be fully liable on the cheque – Greenwood v Martins Bank Limited (1933). In this case G’s wife forged cheques drawn on G’s account. G discovered this but did not inform the bank. When his wife died he sued the bank for the amount of the forged cheques. G was estopped from denying the genuineness of the forged signatures and could not recover. Fraudulent Alteration It is possible that a cheque could be genuinely signed by the customer but which again has been altered or added to with regard to other material details on the cheque. Under s.63(2) of the BEA, ‘material alterations’ are: Alterations to the amount Date Payee’s name, Place for payment, Place where it’s drawn, Crossings, Altering ‘order’ to bearer. Note that whether or not the customer has drawn the cheque with reasonable care, the bank should not pay if there is an obvious alteration. It is bank practice to ask the drawer to sign next to the alteration. As for the banker and its customer, the questions a banker should ask before taking a decision should be: 1) Did the customer exercise reasonable care in drawing the cheque? 2) Was the alteration detectable by the bank? If the answer to both questions is ‘no’ then the customer bears the loss. If the answer to either is ‘yes’ the loss falls to the bank. The bank may wish to rely on the ‘estoppels’ principle, as already explained in section 8.4 above. In order to benefit from estoppel, the bank would be required to: Show ‘representation’ or ‘conduct’ amounting to a representation, which was intended to induce a particular course of conduct by the other party to whom it was made; The other party or person, as a result of (a), acts (or omits to act) in a particular way. Detriment to the other person is caused. Estoppel would more likely be based on the customer’s duty to take usual and reasonable precautions to prevent forgery when he draws cheques. In the case of London Joint Stock Bank v Macmillan and Arthur (1918), M and A’s employee had the task of filling in cheque forms for signature by M or A. The employee drew a cheque payable to the firm or bearer in the sum of $2, written in figures, no words being written. After signature, the employee wrote ‘USD – One hundred and twenty’ in words and added the necessary figures. The bank was entitled to debit the account $120, basing on estoppel. An estoppel operated when the customer failed in his duty, by signing a cheque with the amount in words left in blank, and space in the figures section for the addition of more numerals. Countermand The Bills of Exchange Act states that a bank’s duty and authority to pay a cheque are determined by countermand of payment. This implies that a customer can stop a cheque by giving notice to the bank. The moment notice is received, and before payment has been effected, this would be sufficient authority to the bank not to make payment. In Baines v National Provincial Bank Ltd (1927), B issued a cheque to X shortly before the bank’s closing time. X obtained payment from B’s bank five minutes after closing time. B attempted to stop the cheque the next morning but was unable to do so. The stop order must not be ambiguous and (the stop order) is only effective when it comes to the actual notice of the banker. In Curtice v London City and Midland Bank Ltd (1908), the notice was sent by telegram which was placed in the bank’s letter – box. When the box was emptied, the telegram was left behind. Rather incredibly, it was held that the bank was justified in paying the cheque, as it had not actually received notice of countermand at the time it paid the cheque, because it had not read the telegram. The Act does not require the notice to be in writing. However, it is normal banking practice for the banker to accept orders on telephone and then later seek confirmation of the stop order in writing. By ignoring the order given by telephone, the banker would be in breach of s.74. It is important that the customer gives notice of the stop order to the account holding branch. Where a banker ignores a valid stop notice, it would not be able to debit the customer’s account. Wrongful dishonour It may happen that a bank declines payment of a cheque when it does not have valid grounds for doing so. Such would be unfortunate but the likely situations normally include the following: Failing to realise the customer had removed a stop order Wrongly believing there were insufficient funds - Marzetti v Williams (1830). In this case, sufficient cash was paid in at 1 p.m. and the payment of a cheque was refused at 3 p.m. the same day. Whereas a bank should be allowed reasonable time after the receipt of funds to the credit of an account in order to carry out appropriate book-keeping, this was held to be beyond a reasonable time and the bank was liable for breach of contract. Forgetting than an overdraft facility had been agreed Believing the customer had closed the account when he had not In every case the banker would be in breach of contract. If the bank does pay cash for an open cheque it cannot change its mind once it discovers there are insufficient funds. Such was the case in Chambers v Miller (1862). The payee had obtained payment and was counting the money when the cashier asked for it back. The payee declined to return it and the cashier took it from him by force. The bank was liable for assault and false imprisonment. Statutory Protection for the Paying Bank As pointed out in section 8.3, there are provisions of the BEA that give protection to the bank in view of the risks the banker is exposed to in paying customers cheques. This protection is on two fronts: • An action for breach of contract from its customer i.e. in breach of mandate; and • An action in conversion from some third party, i.e. the bank pays the proceeds to Someone other than the true owner of the cheque.
Recommended publications
  • Chronology, 1963–89
    Chronology, 1963–89 This chronology covers key political and economic developments in the quarter century that saw the transformation of the Euromarkets into the world’s foremost financial markets. It also identifies milestones in the evolu- tion of Orion; transactions mentioned are those which were the first or the largest of their type or otherwise noteworthy. The tables and graphs present key financial and economic data of the era. Details of Orion’s financial his- tory are to be found in Appendix IV. Abbreviations: Chase (Chase Manhattan Bank), Royal (Royal Bank of Canada), NatPro (National Provincial Bank), Westminster (Westminster Bank), NatWest (National Westminster Bank), WestLB (Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale), Mitsubishi (Mitsubishi Bank) and Orion (for Orion Bank, Orion Termbank, Orion Royal Bank and subsidiaries). Under Orion financings: ‘loans’ are syndicated loans, NIFs, RUFs etc.; ‘bonds’ are public issues, private placements, FRNs, FRCDs and other secu- rities, lead managed, co-managed, managed or advised by Orion. New loan transactions and new bond transactions are intended to show the range of Orion’s client base and refer to clients not previously mentioned. The word ‘subsequently’ in brackets indicates subsequent transactions of the same type and for the same client. Transaction amounts expressed in US dollars some- times include non-dollar transactions, converted at the prevailing rates of exchange. 1963 Global events Feb Canadian Conservative government falls. Apr Lester Pearson Premier. Mar China and Pakistan settle border dispute. May Jomo Kenyatta Premier of Kenya. Organization of African Unity formed, after widespread decolonization. Jun Election of Pope Paul VI. Aug Test Ban Take Your Partners Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Connection Issue 70.Pdf
    Issue 70 Winter 2017 connection INSIDE Q3 RESULTS • DIVERSITY AWARDS • BARCLAYS UK TRUSTS WHEELS FOR CHANGE RAISES OVER £255,000 WIN A HOTEL BREAK + WOMEN IN BARCLAYS ARCHIVE SPECIAL + SPECTRUM GALA DINNER Click to get started Keeping retired Barclays employees in touch Inside this issue... EDITOR’S WORD FEATURES REGULARS 5 10 Page 6 Page 4 Barclays news Barclays news Q3 2016 Results, The new £5 note, Barclays Diversity Wheels for Change, Spectrum’s Gala Business Awards 2016 Dinner and Pension Fund newsletter Page 8 Pensioners’ clubs & contacts Happy New Year to you all and welcome Page 12 Bournemouth and District Pensioners’ to the first edition of connection for Archive article 2017. We hope you’ve enjoyed the festive Club, Cornwall Pensioners’ Club, Women in Barclays season and are ready to embrace the Liverpool Retired Staff Club, East New Year. Midlands Pensioners’ Club and Many of you will be reading connection Ipswich District Pensioners’ Club on your computer or tablet screens for the Page 14 first time. To help you move through the Page 16 magazine more easily, we’ve added arrows Life beyond Your letters Barclays to the bottom of the pdf, and we’ve also Page 20 made the clickable links bold to make it The end of an era clear when you can click through to Retirements & obituaries other websites. Please let the Barclays Page 26 Team at Willis Towers Watson know if you Useful contacts no longer wish to receive a printed copy. If you’re thinking of embarking on a new Page 28 adventure this year, turn to pages 14 Competition & crossword and 15 for some Life beyond Barclays inspiration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Headquarters of National Provincial Bank of England
    Symbolism in bank marketing and architecture: the headquarters of National Provincial Bank of England Article Published Version Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) Open Access Barnes, V. and Newton, L. (2019) Symbolism in bank marketing and architecture: the headquarters of National Provincial Bank of England. Management and Organizational History, 14 (3). pp. 213-244. ISSN 1744-9359 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2019.1683038 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/86938/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2019.1683038 Publisher: Taylor and Francis All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Management & Organizational History ISSN: 1744-9359 (Print) 1744-9367 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rmor20 Symbolism in bank marketing and architecture: the headquarters of National Provincial Bank of England Victoria Barnes & Lucy Newton To cite this article: Victoria Barnes & Lucy Newton (2019) Symbolism in bank marketing and architecture: the headquarters of National Provincial Bank of England, Management & Organizational History, 14:3, 213-244, DOI: 10.1080/17449359.2019.1683038 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2019.1683038 © 2019 The Author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Deceased
    Date before which Name of Deceased Address, description and date of death of Deceased Names, addresses and descriptions of Persons to whom notices of claims are to be given notices of claim (Surname first) • and names, in parentheses, of Personal Representatives ' ' to be given LLOYD, May Emily Kenwyn Lodge, Western Road, Fortis Green, National Provincial Bank Limited, 8 Howland Street, Tottenham Court Road, London 28th August 1964 Middlesex, Spinster. 8th June 1964. W.I. (092) PHILLIPS, Mary Flat 3, St. John's Court, Westcliff Parade, Westcliff- Howard Kennedy & Co., 23 Harcourt House, 19 Cavendish Square, London W.I. 3rd September 1964 on-Sea, Essex, Widow. 14th October 1963. (David Crystall and Harry Howard, LL.B.) (093) WARD, Constance Annie 8 Calverley Park, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, Widow, Burton & Ramsden, 81 Piccadilly, London W.I, Solicitors. (James Hildebrand'Ramsden 28th August 1964 Henrietta. llth November 1963. and Jack Bridgeland.) (094) H W SCHOFIELD, William 35 Fitzmauriae Road, Christchurch, Hampshire, Barrington Myers & Partners, Lloyds Bank Chambers, Christchurch, Hampshire, 28th August 1964 1 Arthur. Pilot. 18th February 1964. Solicitors. (Mary Dorothy Anne Schofield.) (095) r o TURNER, Maud Violet The Nosegay, Abersoch, Caernarvonshire, Spinster. Robyns Owen & Son, 36 High Street, Pwllheli, Caernarvonshire, Solicitors. (National 29th August 1964 Breen. 26th May 1964. Provincial Bank Limited.) (096) THOMPSON, Thojnas ... 108 Ponteland Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, General National Provincial Bank Limited, Trustee Branch, 26 Mosley Street, Newcastle upon 27th August 1964 Dealer. 6th June 1964. Tyne. (097) NEILLY, William John... 95 St. Ladoc Road, Keynsham, Bristol, Retired National Provincial Bank Limited, Trustee Branch, 36 Corn Street, Bristol 1, or 27th August 1964 I Clerk.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Statement
    Heritage Statement Overview The application is for the refurbishment and reconfiguration of the existing NatWest Bank located at 21 EastGate Street Standishsgate, Gloucester. NatWest’s first branch in Gloucester originally opened as a branch of National Provincal Bank of England in 1834. Gloucester at this time was a manufacturing centre with extensive dockyards, and was known for its pin-making industry. The city was also home to a growing number of iron foundries producing agricultural and milling implements for the surrounding area. The population of Gloucester had been increasing steadily throughout the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, and by 1831 the city had over 14,000 inhabitants. National Provincial Bank of England had been founded in London in September 1833. From the outset it intended to establish a nationwide network of branches, and Gloucester was to be its very first. The branch opened in King Street on 1 January 1834. It was an immediate success, and even though the traditional industries in the city began to decline in the middle part of the nineteenth century, the construction trades flourished. Following the coming of the railway to Gloucester in 1840, the city also became known for the manufacture of railway carriages. By 1843 increasing demand for banking services in Gloucester meant that the branch had outgrown its original King Street premises. A new purpose-built branch building was erected in Westgate Street, completed in 1844. The branch’s business continued to grow rapidly throughout the nineteenth century, and in 1890 it relocated again to more spacious newly-constructed premises at 21 Eastgate Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Could Be a Recognition Only of What I Have Called External Goods […]
    Competition and the London Clearing Banks, 1946-1979 Linda Arch © [email protected] The Court Room, The Bank of England https://www.flickr.com/photos/ba nkofengland/6220545302, accessed 3 May, 2015 1 Should Nation States Compete? 25-26 June 2015 Structure 1. Introduction 2. Context 3. Attitudes towards competition in clearing banking - ambivalence 4. Attitudes towards competition in clearing banking - embracing competition 5. Discussion and questions 2 Should Nation States Compete? 25-26 June 2015 1. INTRODUCTION 3 Should Nation States Compete? 25-26 June 2015 Alasdair MacIntyre Credit: Sean. https://www.flickr.com/p hotos/seanoconnor365/33 51618688 4 Should Nation States Compete? 25-26 June 2015 Introduction • “without the virtues there could be a recognition only of what I have called external goods […]. And in any society which recognised only external goods competitiveness would be the dominant and even exclusive feature.” • Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Third Edition, (Notre Dame, IND: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007), 196. 5 Should Nation States Compete? 25-26 June 2015 Introduction External goods: • ‘goods of effectiveness’ • profit, money, share price, status, prestige … • property or possession of an individual Internal goods: • ‘goods of excellence’ • achieved in the context of ‘practices’ • benefit the whole community who take part in that practice • Eg. an internal good in clearing banking might be the good of ‘trustworthiness’ 6 Should Nation States Compete? 25-26 June 2015 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • The Commercial Banking Industry and Its Part in the Emergence
    The Commercial Banking Industry and its part in the emergence and consolidation of the Corporate Economy in Britain before 1940 Journal of Industrial History, 3(2)The (2000) Commercial Banking Industry in Britain before 1940 Peter Wardley University of the West of England, Bristol ‘He did not think the banks had yet explored the enormous possibilities of mechanical methods. He thought the counter work at English banks was about as efficient as they could ever get, but he was suspicious as to whether they were as up to date behind the counter. He could see the banks of the future as possessing physical bodies of wonderfully contrived mechanism, almost everything of routine being done by machinery with the brains for the personal convenience of customers, and scientific conditions of control, a great civil service with a high tradition of public service, with opportunities for development and employment of many different talents. On the other hand, it was conceivable they might develop into mere money making machines.’ John Maynard Keynes, ‘The future opportunities of the bank official’; presented at the Cambridge Centre of the Institute of Banking; reported in the Cambridge Daily News, 15 October 1927; and, reprinted as ‘Mr J. M. Keynes on banking services’ in the Journal of the Institute of Banking, November 1927, vol. xlviii, p. 497. Banks engage in business which is intended to organise the profitable production of financial services and, like other privately-owned firms in a market economy, employ capital and labour to achieve this objective. Furthermore, as in other companies, it is within banks that more efficient combinations of capital and labour generate productivity growth.
    [Show full text]
  • 1914 and 1939
    APPENDIX PROFILES OF THE BRITISH MERCHANT BANKS OPERATING BETWEEN 1914 AND 1939 An attempt has been made to identify as many merchant banks as possible operating in the period from 1914 to 1939, and to provide a brief profle of the origins and main developments of each frm, includ- ing failures and amalgamations. While information has been gathered from a variety of sources, the Bankers’ Return to the Inland Revenue published in the London Gazette between 1914 and 1939 has been an excellent source. Some of these frms are well-known, whereas many have been long-forgotten. It has been important to this work that a comprehensive picture of the merchant banking sector in the period 1914–1939 has been obtained. Therefore, signifcant efforts have been made to recover as much information as possible about lost frms. This listing shows that the merchant banking sector was far from being a homogeneous group. While there were many frms that failed during this period, there were also a number of new entrants. The nature of mer- chant banking also evolved as stockbroking frms and issuing houses became known as merchant banks. The period from 1914 to the late 1930s was one of signifcant change for the sector. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), 361 under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 B. O’Sullivan, From Crisis to Crisis, Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96698-4 362 Firm Profle T. H. Allan & Co. 1874 to 1932 A 17 Gracechurch St., East India Agent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grasshopper Pensioners' Club Just As We Have For
    THE GRASSHOPPER PENSIONERS’ CLUB Website: www.martinsbank.co.uk © gut informiert! SECRETARY: David Baldwin, Lower Windle, Windle Royd Lane, Warley, HX2 7LY. 'Phone: 01422 832734. email: [email protected] CHAIRMAN: Bernard Lovewell TREASURER: Robert Bunn WELFARE OFFICER: Susan Sutcliffe New Year Edition 2021 JUST AS WE HAVE MORE MEMORIES On this occasion from 1951 when our two best- FOR BEEN 458 YEARS, represented Districts in our membership met in WE’RE STILL HERE WITH their annual match, where the following photograph and comments were cut from their magazine by Joan and Gordon Anthony: The annual match between Liverpool and London Districts took place on Monday 8th October on the ground of the Odyssey WE WILL REMEMBER THEM THE MARTINS BANK WAR MEMORIAL In our last edition we mentioned the rededication of our War Memorial in 54 Lombard Street we are now attempting to identify its current location. Club in Liverpool, the kick-off being taken by Mr. J.A. Banks, the Liverpool District Manager. Fog, which persisted all day, lifted just before the match began and the game took place in brilliant sunshine but with a rather strong breeze across the pitch. Liverpool pressed strongly from the beginning and after fifteen minutes they were rewarded with a goal by Smith, the left winger, from an opening made by Bass, who had headed across the goal mouth. Play was fairly even for the next twenty minutes and then London broke away and Anthony, the centre forward, scored for the visitors. Both goal-keepers had more to do in the second half and had it not been the good work of Ford, the keeper for London, who made two excellent saves, the visitors would probably have been defeated, whereas the match ended in a draw.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysing Risk Management in Banks: Evidence of Bank Efficiency
    British Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences 1 March 2017, Vol. 13 (2) The Nature and Extent of the Reciprocal Obligations Involved in the Banker/Customer Relationship Stanyo Dinov Abstract The current paper explores the banker/customer relationship and its historical development. Based on statuary and case law, it outlines the definitions of banker and customer, the duration of their relationship and their individual rights and obligations. Recent changes of the relationship and the differences, resulting from court decisions in England and Scotland regarding their obligations, are also presented. The article also trays to predict the possible changes to the banker/customer relationship in the near future. The most important conclusions, as well as possible further developments, are outlined at the end. Keywords: BEA, CCA, JCR, BPS, ATM systems I. Introduction The relationship between the banker and the customer has changed over time, so it is not easy to predict the nature of this relationship in the near future. Recent rapid technological development has raised many questions about customers‟ privacy and protection. Therefore, there is still a need to closely examine the legal aspects of this relationship from the past to the present, in order to find the best approach to its future context. II. Definition, nature and formation of reciprocal obligation 1. Definition The banker/customer relationship consists of two sides. A banker, according to the Bills of Exchange Act (BEA) 1882 s 2, „includes a body of persons whether
    [Show full text]
  • A “Quiet Victory”: National Provincial, Gibson Hall, and the Switch from Comprehensive Redevelopment to Urban Preservation in 1960S London
    A “Quiet Victory”: National Provincial, Gibson Hall, and the Switch from Comprehensive Redevelopment to Urban Preservation in 1960s London VICTORIA BARNES LUCY NEWTON PETER SCOTT © The Author 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial reuse or in order to create a derivative work. doi:10.1017/eso.2020.35 VICTORIA BARNES is a senior research fellow at the Max Planck Instutite for European Legal History, Frankfurt, Germany. She works on the history of business, its form and regulation in law and society. Her recent work can be read in the Journal of Corporation Law, Hastings Business Law Journal, Company Lawyer, and the Journal of Legal History. Contact information: Max-Planck-Institute for European Legal History, Hansaallee 41, Frankfurt am Main, Hesse 60323, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]. LUCY NEWTON is professor of business history at Henley Business School, University of Reading. She has published her work on banks and nineteenth-century consumer durables in a variety of business history journals. Her journal article, with Francesca Carnevali, “Pianos for the People,” was the winner of the Oxford Journals Article Prize for Best Paper in Enterprise and Society (2013), awarded March 2014. Contact information: University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Barclays PLC Rights Issue Prospectus
    THIS PROSPECTUS AND ANY ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS ARE IMPORTANT AND REQUIRE YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in any doubt as to the action you should take, you are recommended to seek immediately your own personal financial advice from your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant, fund manager or other appropriate independent financial adviser, who is authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the “FSMA”) if you are in the UK or, if not, from another appropriately authorised independent financial adviser. If you sell or have sold or otherwise transferred all of your Existing Ordinary Shares (other than ex-rights) held in certificated form before 18 September 2013 (the “Ex-Rights Date”) please send this Prospectus, together with any Provisional Allotment Letter, duly renounced, if and when received, at once to the purchaser or transferee or to the bank, stockbroker or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected for delivery to the purchaser or transferee except that such documents should not be sent to any jurisdiction where to do so might constitute a violation of local securities laws or regulations. If you sell or have sold or otherwise transferred all or some of your Existing Ordinary Shares (other than ex-rights) held in uncertificated form before the Ex-Rights Date, a claim transaction will automatically be generated by Euroclear UK which, on settlement, will transfer the appropriate number of Nil Paid Rights to the purchaser or transferee. If you sell or have sold or otherwise transferred only part of your holding of Existing Ordinary Shares (other than ex-rights) held in certificated form before the Ex-Rights Date, you should refer to the instruction regarding split applications in Part II “Terms and Conditions of the Rights Issue” of this Prospectus and in the Provisional Allotment Letter, if and when received.
    [Show full text]