1B: North East Hampshire Plantations and Heath

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1B: North East Hampshire Plantations and Heath 1B: NORTH EAST HAMPSHIRE PLANTATIONS AND HEATH Castle Bottom nature reserve (Hantsweb) – the mixture of open heath, valley mire and scrub woodland are internationally designated and hark back to a former open landscape which covered most of the character area in the 19th century. Fleet Pond acidic pond, mire and Heathy commons internationally Conifer plantation over heath - alder carr. important wildlife sites and for Hawley local access e.g. Yateley Common Common edge settlements typify the Eversley Cross Green typical Sand and Gravel extraction – early settlement plan form – the common historic form of medieval origin restoration phase nr Warren extends well into the village of settlement on terrace above the Heath Hartney Witney.- Blackwater valley floor Hampshire County 1 Status: FINAL May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment North East Hampshire Plantations and Heath Hampshire County 2 Status: FINAL May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment North East Hampshire Plantations and Heath 1.0 Location and Boundaries 1.1 This character area lies in the northeast corner of the County bounded to the north and east by the Blackwater River Valley and to the west by the White Water Valley. It is fringed to the south by more elevated land of the Hart Downs. The extent of this character area is determined primarily by the presence of sandy soils on locally elevated, gravely geology. 1.2 Component County Landscape Types Heath and Forest Enclosed, Lowland Mosaic Heath Associated, River Valley Floor 1.3 Composition of Borough/District LCAs: Rushmoor District Hart District (contd.) Blackwater Valley (including various Minley subdivisions) Tweseldown Urban (including military towns) Redlands Heathland and Forest Hart Valley Farnborough Aerodrome Whitewater Valley Southwood Amenity Open Space Tylney Pasture and Woodland Winchfield Hazeley/West Green Hart District Wellington Blackwater Valley Bramshill Firgrove Firgrove Urban The boundaries of this character area correlate well with local assessments with the exception of the area around Wellington. This area has been included because it comprises woodland and plantation on heath, a type common elsewhere in this character area. 1.4 Associations with NCAs and Natural Areas: NCA 129: Thames Basin Heaths NA 66: London Basin 2.0 Key Characteristics • Gently undulating landscape of plateau areas dissected by river valleys. • Predominantly well drained sandy soils over clays and sands giving rise to acidic conditions and some areas of local waterlogging. Hampshire County 3 Status: FINAL May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment North East Hampshire Plantations and Heath • Distinctive ‘heathy’ character throughout reflected in acidic loving vegetation and giving rise to a colourful landscape through the seasons. • Contains internationally important habitats including dry and wet heaths, bogs, scrub and woodland • Land use comprises a mosaic of woodland, including conifer plantations, blocks of remnant open heathland and medium scaled pasture fields. • Varied public access network of commons and open land on the heath and rights of way in the river valleys. • Strong connections to military training from the 18th century and aviation. • Concentration of large parkland landscapes and extensive areas of mineral extraction. • Broad shallow valley of the Blackwater and narrower valleys of the River Hart and Whitewater with flat and low-lying riverside meadows. • Large urban areas of Aldershot, Farnborough and Fleet and numerous transport corridors (M3, A30, and Basingstoke Canal) and high density of dispersed settlement of common edge origin, and smallholdings. • Enclosed often intimate character with limited outward views and a sense of remoteness and seclusion despite proximity to populated areas. 3.0 Physical Characteristics and Land Use 3.1 The plateau south of Beacon Hill rises to a maximum of 188 AOD but generally between 170-185AOD. It is noticeably higher than the Loddon and Whitewater valleys to the west and continues to rise into Surrey to the east beyond the Blackwater. In places there are marked scarps and incised valleys e.g. around Beacon Hill and Caesar’s Camp. The area forms the southern part of the London Basin and the edge of the Weald, comprising Bagshot Sands, Bracklesham Beds and Barton Sands. The result is a mixture of clays, sand and pebble formations which give rise to generally nutrient poor, free draining acid soils with pockets of waterlogged ground, supporting heathland and forest vegetation. More productive farmland occurs where brown earth soils are found, such as around Hartley Wintney, and where silts occur in the river valleys. Where classified, agricultural land quality is generally of medium quality but lower quality in river floodplains. 3.2 The area has a high concentration of commercial forestry on former heathland in the north with a gradual transition to more mixed heathland and farmland landscape to the south e.g. around Yateley and Hawley Commons. In the plateau areas where very acidic soils predominate, the typical vegetation includes birch, pine, gorse, heather, bracken and broom. There has been a recent trend of heathland restoration from conifer plantation. The larger areas of heathland are represented in the landscape types mapping. In the mixed farmland mosaic landscapes to the south, west and northwest, medium scaled pasture and arable fields are defined by thick hedgerows with hedgerow trees, often with banks and ditches, or by small ancient semi-natural woods. In places the rural character is affected by suburbanising influences such as golf courses, horse grazing, roads and pylons, as well as visual intrusion from adjacent urban areas. Large urban areas, mainly developed in the last 50 years, are a key component of this character area. 3.3 The principal rivers in the area are the Blackwater and the Hart, fed by a network of streams. Those that feed the Hart rise in the chalk to the south and flow Hampshire County 4 Status: FINAL May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment North East Hampshire Plantations and Heath northwards into the London Basin. The Basingstoke Canal passes through the south-eastern part of the character area between Fleet and Aldershot. Where former gravel extraction has taken place large water bodies have been created particularly along the valley floor of the Blackwater. 4.0 Experiential/Perceptual Characteristics 4.1 The varied colours and textures of acidic vegetation are a defining characteristic and add to this area’s scenic value. Weather conditions can strongly influence the perceptual qualities of the landscape, particularly in the open heath and plantation areas where experiences can range from exhilarating and colourful to sombre and bleak. Views are constrained by the many woodlands and thick hedgerows and although the Chalklands to the south may be visible from areas of higher ground, generally the landscape as a whole is intimately enclosed and is valued for remoteness and seclusion, despite close proximity to urban areas. 4.2 The heathland/common landscapes are popular for recreation. There is permissive access over much of the military owned land. The lack of roads and lanes across the heathland, common and plantation landscapes contrasts strongly with adjacent areas of mixed farming. Within the river valleys there is a good network of Public Rights of Way. Lakes which have been created following gravel extraction along the Blackwater valley are popular for water sports and fishing. The Southwood Amenity Open Space is a major open recreational resource for the adjacent high density population. 4.3 Areas of extensive common/heathland and conifer plantation are quiet and secluded and have a sense of remoteness. Although this declines within the more settled mixed farmland, adjacent to major urban areas and where suburban and military activity and roads are present, they contribute greatly to a perception of remoteness, isolation and tranquillity. 5.0 Biodiversity Character 5.1 This landscape character area contains a range of habitats which are internationally important for biodiversity, and part of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (SPA). This is a composite site across Surrey, Hampshire and Berkshire. It consists of dry and wet heaths, bogs, scrub and woodland, and supports breeding lowland bird populations of Nightjar, Woodlark and Dartford Warbler. 5.2 There are several Sites of Special Scientific Interest which fall largely within the SPA designation, and are similarly important for their heathland habitats and species. These include Hazeley Heath, a large tract of heathland with acid grassland, bracken, wet, dry and humid heath and extensive stands of gorse; Bramshill SSSI, a mosaic of coniferous plantation, shallow acidic ponds, mires within relict wet heath and small unimproved grassland areas and habitat for bird species such as Nightjar, Woodlark and Dartford Warbler; Fleet Pond SSSI and Local Nature Reserve, a shallow lake with rich and aquatic flora and rare fauna, and is rare in the south of England, edged by extensive reedbeds, alder carr and acid, oak dominated, woodlands. Castle Bottom to Yateley and Hawley Commons SSSI, comprises heathland habitats with coniferous plantations which represent one of the largest remnants of lowland heath in the Thames Basin, supporting species such as heather, bell heather and dwarf gorse; Bourley and Long Valley SSSI, a diverse Hampshire County 5 Status: FINAL May 2012 Integrated Character Assessment North East Hampshire Plantations and Heath mosaic or heathland,
Recommended publications
  • Hart DC, Chair), Kathryn Steele (Hart DC, Secretary), Therese Abbott (Easement Holders), John Collman (Naturalist), Lindsay Mackay (Small Land Owners
    Hazeley Heath Consultative Group 22/08/2017 Victoria Hall, Hartley Wintney Present: Phil Maund (Hart DC, Chair), Kathryn Steele (Hart DC, Secretary), Therese Abbott (Easement holders), John Collman (Naturalist), Lindsay Mackay (Small land owners) Apologies: Leigh Wallace (Hart DC), Mike Coates (RSPB), David Sexton (Mattingley Parish), Julian Bishop (Commoners) 1. Minutes from previous meeting Minutes were considered and approved. 2. Matters arising Hart Ponds - PM: Previously awaiting confirmation if consent is required for new ponds, consent is not required if an existing pond. Letter from Mattingley Parish - PM: Hart and RSPB are awaiting a signed letter of consent for the PINS application from Mattingley Parish Council. This has been completed via LW and MC. Natural England surveys - Action is outstanding for Matt Taylor (Natural England) to find out when the field units are due at Hazeley. ACTION: PM Bramshill crossing - PM: No change from 09/05/2017 meeting. ACTION: LW/PM Himalayan Balsam – PM: No enforcement available for neighbouring land on Hazeley streams and rivers. Hart can manage what they are responsible for. There is scope for an initiative such as volunteering to aid in the removal of Himalayan Balsam. Fencing Application – PM: HART and the RSPB have met and chose the same specification and structures. Naming of Features – JC: The features still require naming such as the scrapes. This is to be carried out during winter when there is less work on. HART and the RSPB to aid in choosing these alongside the management plan. Are these to be short coded names or site relevant names? ACTION: PM/ JC Surveys 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleet to Greywell
    Fleet to Greywell Customer information event Project overview • 10 million investment into futureproofing the drinking water network • Planning to install 12 kilometres of water main between Fleet and Odiham • At present, the project is set to begin in June 2021 and be complete by April 2023 • New pipe will allow us to draw in water from other areas of the county to counter a predicted rise in demand in Odiham, Greywell and towns to the west – including Basingstoke. • Pipe will be laid predominantly along the highway, although some sections will involve digging in rural areas. A series of road closures will be required • Working closely with all of our stakeholders, customers and landowners to minimise disruption to businesses and the local community 2 The route • Following extensive consultation with our stakeholders, the selected route is deemed the one which will cause the least amount of disruption to the public and environment • The route will involve passing under a section of North Hants Golf Club. We investigated other options, but nearby roads are extremely congested with existing utilities and the ground conditions are not suitable. • Other routes would require road closures and would consequently have caused mass disruption to customers and commuters due to a long diversion route via Minley Road. 3 4 5 6 Work carried out so far • Undertaken ground investigations for entire route (trial holes and boreholes). • Undertaken environmental surveys for entire route (some ongoing) • Installed 1.8 kilometres of main between Greywell
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Hampshire Action Team for Hart and Rushmoor Action Notes for HAT
    Hampshire Action Team for Hart and Rushmoor Action Notes for HAT Highways Meeting Friday 26th March 2010, 10.00am, The Boyce Building, Aldershot Attendance (P = Present NP = Not Present A = Apologies Received) HAT Members Cllr Collett (P) Cllr Glen (P) Cllr Kimber (A) Cllr Leversha (P) Cllr Muschamp (P) Cllr Neal (HAT Vice Chairman) (P) Cllr Radley (P) Cllr Simpson (P) Cllr Wall (HAT Chairman) (P) Cllr Wheale (P) HCC Officers Kevin Andrews (A) Cheryl Bosworth (P) Dean Cronk (P) Andy Kettlewell (P) Helen Merrills (P) Steve Pellatt (P) Keith Rogers (P) James Strachan (P) Partners Cllr Chris Cornwell (HDAPTC) (P) Cllr Parker (HDC) (P) John Foggo (HDC) (P) Cllr Roland Dibbs (RBC) (P) John Trusler (RBC) (P) David Fawcett (Amey) (P) Kunle Kolaru (Amey) (P) 1. Apologies Apologies had been received from Councillor Kimber. 2. Notes of Highways Meeting held on 1 December 2009 Councillor Wall declared a personal interest on item 3 in relation to Marrowbrook Lane. The following amendments were noted: 1 Item 3, page 2, paragraph 2 – should read; “Cllr Wall reported that the carriageway surface redressing had not taken place between house numbers 25 and 55 on Marrowbrook Lane, Cove”. Item 5, page 3, paragraph 5 – should read; “It was noted that this study was being undertaken by Atkins on behalf of the South East England Partnership Board managed by West Berkshire Strategic Transport Forum”. Item 6, page 3 – ‘Coley’ Park should read ‘Cody’ Park. Matters Arising: The issue of future housing development in Wokingham (3,500 houses) was discussed, particularly in regard to the impact it will have on highways in Hart.
    [Show full text]
  • Polling Districts and Polling Places: Returning Officer's Proposed Structure from 1/12/19 Changes to Current Structure Marked in RED
    Polling Districts and Polling Places: Returning Officer's Proposed Structure from 1/12/19 Changes to current structure marked in RED PD Letters PD Letters from Parl (existing) 1/12/19 Rationale and explanation for any changes PD Name Polling Station until 30/11/19 Planned Polling Station from 1/12/19 Proposed Polling Place Known polling station issues Reason for the Polling District PARISH PARISH WARD District Ward County Division Const AB AB Blackwater The Blackwater Centre The Blackwater Centre Within the polling district is a whole parish ward BLACKWATER BLACKWATER BLACKWATER & HAWLEYYE & B ALD AD AD Darby Green Darby Green and Frogmore Social Darby Green Centre Within the polling district Brings all of Darby Green and Potley voters into one place Created to allow a parish ward to split across YATELEYPC DARBY GREEN & POTLEY HILLYATELEY EAST YE & B ALD AF AF Frogmore Darby Green and Frogmore Social Darby Green and Frogmore Social Within the polling district (AF) or at Darby Green and Frogmore Social Hall (AD) is a whole parish ward YATELEY FROGMORE BLACKWATER & HAWLEYYE & B ALD AH (PART) AH Remaining eastern part of Hawley and Minley centred on Hawley Hawley Hawley Memorial Hall Hawley Memorial Hall Within the polling district Created to make it easier for electors BLACKWATER Hawley & Minley BLACKWATER & HAWLEYYE & B ALD AH (PART) AM New to provide for development at Sun Park Minley Hawley Memorial Hall Hawley Memorial Hall but opportunity to locate closer to Sun Park Within the polling district (AM) or within Hawley Memorial Hall (AH)
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN April 1992 NRA National Rivers Authority Thames Region BLACKWATER RIVER CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION DRAFT April 1992 FOREWARD The National Rivers Authority was created in 1989 to conserve and enhance the natural water environment. In our role as 'Guardians of the Water Environment' we are committed to preparing a sound and thorough plan for the future management of the region's river catchments. This Draft Catchment Management Plan is a step towards achieving that goal for the Blackwater River catchment. As a vehicle for consultation it will provide a means of seeking a consensus on the way ahead and as a planning document it will be a means of seeking commitment from all parties to realising the environmental potential of the catchment. » '' I ■ ; We look forward to receiving the contributions of those organisations and individuals involved with the river and its catchment. Les Jones Regional General Manager Kings Meadow House Kings Meadow Road Reading Berks RGl 800 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY II Tel: Reading (0734) 535000 II Telex: 849614 NRATHA G Fax: (0734) 500388 121268 Blackwater Rivet DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN A p r i l 1 9 9 2 National Rivers Authority Thames Region King's Meadow House King's Meadow Road Reading BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTENTS LIST Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The National Rivers Authority 1.1 1.2 Catchment Management Planning 1.2 2.0 CATCHMENT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction 2.1 2.2 General Features 2.2 2.3 Topography 2.4 2.4
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting
    Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting Monday 20th March 7.30pm Heckfield Memorial Hall Present: Cllr Janice Hughes (JH) (Chairman); Cllr Bob Aylmer (BA); Cllr David Sexton (DS); Cllr Alan Woolford (AW). Clerk Susan Turner (ST) Guests: District Councillor Anne Crampton. Members of the public: 1 17.35 PubliC OPen SeSSiOn i A Hound Green resident expressed appreciation for the new benches etc on the Green and particularly the footbridge to Vicarage Lane. It was noted that Cllr Anne Crampton had been instrumental in approving the allocation of S106 funding. A separate dog waste bin was suggested for Hound Green, the current multi- purpose bin being close to the picnic table. ii A Vicarage lane resident emailed questions and concerns as unable to attend the meeting. ‘1. The speed of vehicles and lack of care in country lanes especially driving over banks and verges. Could Highways be persuaded to put in more passing spaces in Bottle and Vicarage Lanes?’ Parish Council comment: With cuts in Highways funding this is unlikely to be a priority. This is a question to refer to our County Councillor. ‘2. Asking for volunteers to clear litter from our area. Not much can be done about the rubbish thrown from cars and vans.’ Parish Council would encourage everyone to help tidy up litter from their local area. ‘3. The standard of hedge cutting by councils and their sensitivity to the environment.’ The local landowner is responsible for hedgcutting and is thought to be sensitive to the environment. ‘4. When the B3349 is closed, suggest a one way system in Bottle/Vicarage Lanes.’ Measures for the road closure will be discussed with SE Water and Highways.
    [Show full text]
  • Countryside Access Plan for the Forest of Eversley 2008-2013
    Forest of Forest Eversley Countryside Access Plan for the Forest of Eversley 2008-2013 Countryside Access covers.indd 3-4 6/11/08 10:54:51 Legend BERKSHIRE Forest of Eversley CAP Area Motorway A Road Rivers Built up areas A327 Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty YATE L E Y A33 Loddon & Eversley Heritage Area County Boundary A30 NORTH A340 WESSEX HARTLEY DOWNS WINTNEY FARNBOROUGH AONB HOOK A339 FLEET M3 SURREY A323 BASINGSTOKE A331 ALDERSHOT A30 A339 A287 SURREY HILLS AONB A31 012340.5 Miles © Crown copyright. All rights reserved, HCC 100019180 2008 The Forest of Eversley area Hampshire County Council would like to thank the many people – local residents, landowners and land managers, user-group representatives, local authority officers, elected members and a host of others – who were involved in the work to produce this plan. The product of their efforts and support is a framework which will enable the County Council and others to work together to improve countryside access across Hampshire and to make it available for the widest possible range of people to enjoy. Forest of Eversley Contents Introduction…………………………………………………2 The Forest of Eversley area……………………………... 3 Vision ……………………………………………………...... 4 Summary of findings …………………..…………….….... 4 Main issues …………………………………………………. 5 Guide to the action tables …………………………..…... 6 Issues and proposed actions ……………………….. 8 - 25 Appendix 1 – Extent of rights of way network Appendix 2 – Overview of access = 1 Countryside Access Plan Introduction This Countryside Access Plan (CAP) for County Council’s main, county-wide aims the Forest of Eversley area is one of seven for improving access to Hampshire’s area plans which, together with an eighth countryside and explains how these plans ‘County Overview’ CAP, form the Rights are influencing the way the County of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP) for Council delivers its services.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Hart in Hampshire
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Hart in Hampshire Report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions July 2000 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND This report sets out the Commission’s final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for the district of Hart in Hampshire. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Professor Michael Clarke CBE (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Kru Desai Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes CBE Barbara Stephens Chief Executive © Crown Copyright 2000 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no: 163 ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page LETTER TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 13 6 NEXT STEPS 29 APPENDICES A Final Recommendations for Hart: Detailed Mapping 31 B Draft Recommendations for Hart (January 2000) 37 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for Fleet and Yateley is inserted inside the back cover of the report. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Local Government Commission for England 25 July 2000 Dear Secretary of State On 20 July 1999 the Commission began a periodic electoral review of Hart under the Local Government Act 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • A Settlement Hierarchy for Hart District
    Local Development Framework Background Paper A Settlement Hierarchy for Hart District January 2010 (updated August 2010) - 2 - Contents 1 Introduction …………………………………………………………... 2 2 The Local Plan Approach ……………………………………………... 3 3 Core Strategy Preferred Options (2006) approach ………………….. 6 4 Policy Context ………………………………... ……………………… 8 5 Profile of Rural Hampshire …………………………………………… 10 6 Analysis of settlements ………………………………………………... 12 7 Formulating a new settlement hierarchy……………………………… 12 Appendices Appendix 1: Breakdown of settlements by population, facilities and services……................. 18 Appendix 2: Map of road and rail network in Hart District ………………………………. 21 Figures Figure 1: Map of the Settlement Boundaries in the Adopted Local Plan (1996-2006) .……. 5 Figure 2: Map of Hampshire County Council Rural and Urban Classification…….................. 11 Figure 3: Map of the Proposed Settlement Hierarchy …………………………….................. 16 - 1 - 1. Introduction 1.1 Following the revocation of the Regional Spatial Strategies by the new Conservative – Liberal Democrat Coalition Government in June 2010 it is considered necessary to update the original Settlement Hierarchy Background Paper (January 2010) in light of the changes. 1.2 Hart District contains a number of towns and villages that vary in size. It is useful for plan-making purposes to group these settlements into a hierarchy based on an understanding of their current size and level of service provision. 1.3 It is important to note that the hierarchy does not in itself amount to a spatial strategy and does not dictate the levels of growth that will go to different settlements. It is a hierarchy based on the settlements as they are now, rather than as they might look in the future. It is merely a framework around which one or more options for a spatial strategy can be articulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Capacity Study 2016
    Hart Landscape Capacity Study Main Study and Appendix 1 Hart District Council (2016) Contents Page 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Introduction 8 3. Background to Study 9 4. Objectives 10 5. Approach and Methodology 11 6. Assessment Thresholds 21 7. Study Constraints 25 8. Map of the District: Summary of Results 26 Appendix 1: Local Area Summaries 27 Appendix 2: Local Area Record Sheets 157 Hart District Council Local Plan Landscape Capacity Study 2016 1.0 Executive Summary 1.1 Purpose of the Study This report has been produced to inform the evidence base for the Hart District Council Local Plan. It assesses the relative capacity of the landscape to accommodate development in the rural areas of the District, outside of the established settlement boundaries. The capacity of each area has been awarded by testing the results of each assessment against the following criteria: Low capacity – the landscape area could not accommodate areas of new development without a significant and adverse impact on the landscape character. Occasional, very small scale development may be possible, providing it has regard to the setting and form of existing settlement and the character and the sensitivity of the adjacent character areas. Low/medium capacity – a minimal amount of development could be accommodated only in limited situations, providing it has regard to the setting and form of existing settlement and the character and the sensitivity of the adjacent character areas. Medium capacity – the landscape area could be able to accommodate areas of development in some parts, providing it has regard to the setting and form of existing settlement and the character and the sensitivity of the adjacent character areas.
    [Show full text]
  • SHL023 Land West of Marsh Lane Eversley
    Hart District Council Local Plan Site Assessment: Stage 2 – High Level Site Assessment – SHL023 – Land West of Marsh Lane, Eversley Cross Confidential Draft - 1.1 – April 2015 High Level Site Assessment Proforma Site Reference SHL023 Site Name Land West of Marsh Lane Parish Eversley Site Address Land West of Marsh Lane, Eversley Cross Capacity Assessment and Categorisation Site Size (ha) 7.44ha Estimated Capacity 134 Comments on capacity The capacity was calculated using a dph figure of 18 (in accordance with gross-to-net ratio of 60%). Housing Strategy Category(s) Strategy 2 (Dispersal strategy) Land Supply Category Category C: Large and ʻlocal strategicʼ sites adjoining existing urban areas Key to Site Assessments: No overriding constraint to development of the site Constraint requiring further detailed assessment Major constraint undermining suitability of site Site Assessment Assessment Criteria Assessment comments Coloured assessment Accessibility to o Bus Stop – (Fox Lane, services: 82, and 83) 0.86km Employment and o Railway Station – (Sandhurst) 4.89km services o Employment Centre – (Blackbushe Business Park) 3.12km o Public Open Space – (Eversley Recreation Ground) 0.86km o Health Facility – (Monteagle Surgery, Yateley) 1.67km o Primary School – (Charles Kingsleyʼs Primary School) 1.8km o Secondary School – (Yateley School) 2.15km o Supermarket – (Waitrose, Yateley) 1.51km Infrastructure • Schools: There is a pressure for places at Primary education level. Although there are no identified deficits in provision capacity at Primary, Junior or Infant Schools within the Eversley/Yateley/Frogmore area they are full or close to full. Additional housing will exacerbate this situation. There are no planned expansions of any of the schools in the area, if there is any significant development that is not forecast will cause increased pressures on the local primary, junior and infant schools.
    [Show full text]