Addendum: Additional Details and Answers to Chat Questions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. -
Native Groundcovers: Sustainable Living Mulch
Toadshade Wildflower Farm’s Native Groundcovers: Sustainable Living Mulch www.toadshade.com Scientific Name Common Name Height Sun Requirements Moisture Requirements A Few More Details Achillea millefolium Yarrow 1-3 ft Sun to Part Sun Dry to Average Clay/Poor Soil Tolerant Adiantum pedatum Maidenhair fern 1-2.5 ft Part Sun to Shade Average to Moist Acid tolerant, attractive foliage Anemone canadensis Canada Anemone 1-2 ft Sun to Shade Average to Moist Clay tolerant, white flowers May-June Antennaria plantaginifolia Plantain-Leaved Pussytoes 3-6 in Sun to Part Sun Dry to Moist Acid tolerant, low-growing except for flowering stalk, American Lady Butterfly host plant Aquilegia canadensis Wild Eastern Columbine 1-2 ft Sun to Shade Dry to Average Red/Yellow Flowers attract hummingbirds in Spring Asarum canadense Canadian Wildginger 6-12 in Part Sun to Shade Moist Host Plant for Pipevine Swallowtail Athyrium filix-femina Lady fern 1-3 ft Sun to Shade Average to Moist Rich soil, somewhat drought tolerant, attractive foliage Carex appalachica Appalachian Sedge 1-2 ft Part Sun to Shade Dry to Average Fine-leaved sedge, Deer resistant Carex grayi Gray’s Sedge 2 ft Sun to Shade Average to Moist Deer Resistant Carex intumescens Shining Bur Sedge 1-2.5 ft Sun to Shade Average to Moist Host Plant for Several Butterflies Carex lupuliformis Hop Sedge 1-3.5 ft Sun to Shade Average to Moist Clay Tolerant, Good Rain Garden Plant Carex lurida Shallow Sedge 1-4 ft Sun to Shade Moist to Wet Tolerates Periodic Flooding Carex pensylvanica Pennsylvania Sedge -
Native Plant Catalog
native plant catalog HERBACEOUS PLANTS Page 1 Botanical Name Common Name Color Bloom Light Soil Height Agastache 'Black Adder' Hyssop Violet-Blue June-Sept Full Sun M-D 2-3' Fragrant flowers attract bees, butterflies, and hummingbirds; Compact and good for containers; Deer resistant. Allium cernuum Nodding Onion Lt Pink May-June Sun-Pt Shade D 12-18” Attracts bees and butterflies; perfect for rocky soils; tolerates drought once established. Amsonia 'Blue Ice' Blue Star Dark Blue Apr-May Sun-Pt Shade M 12-15" Attracts hummingbirds, bees, and butterflies; foliage turns golden yellow in fall, adding stunning color to the garden. Amsonia tab. var. salicifolia Eastern Bluestar Lt Blue Apr-May Sun-Pt Shade M 2-3’ Attracts bees and butterflies; tolerates clay soil and drought; attractive yellow fall color. Stake in moist soils. Aquilegia canadensis Wild Columbine Red and Yellow Apr-May Part Shade M-D 1-3' Attracts hummingbirds and butterflies; self sows in woodland garden. Tolerates dry soil and deer. Arisaema triphyllum Jack-in-the-Pulpit Green/Maroon Apr-June Shade M 1-2' Bright red berry cluster in fall provides food for birds, mammals, and turtles. A true specimen plant for the woodland garden. Asarum canadense Wild Ginger Maroon May-June Shade M 6" Alternate larval host plant for pipevine swallowtail butterfly; a wonderful slow-spreading groundcover for deep shade. Asclepias incarnata Swamp Milkweed Rose-Pink July-Sept Full Sun M-W 3-5’ Larval host for monarch butterfly; attracts bees, butterflies, and hummingbirds; a good choice for rain gardens; tolerates clay soils. Asclepias syriaca Common Milkweed Pale Pink July-Sept Full Sun M-D 2-4' Larval host for monarch butterfly; attracts bees, butterflies and hummingbirds; tolerates clay soils. -
Jan. 1, 1974 M. OWNBEY Plant Pat. 3,419 DICENTRA PLANT Filed Aug
Jan. 1, 1974 M. OWNBEY Plant Pat. 3,419 DICENTRA PLANT Filed Aug. 23, 1971 Plant Pat. 3,419 United States Patent Office Patented Jan. 1, 1974 1. 2 PREFERRED CONDITIONS OF GROWTH DICENiRAPLANT3.419 The plant thrives best, both as to growth and flower Marion Ownbey, Pullman, Wash., assignor to The ing, in the full sun, but it tolerates medium to dense Wayside Gardens Company, Mentor, Ohio shade. The particular exposure is not critical, but a Well Filed Aug. 23, 1971, Ser. No. 174,066 5 drained, fertile, sand or sandy loam soil is preferred for Int, Cl, A01 h 5/00 best growth and bloom. U.S. C. Plt-68 1. Claim This application is directed to a new and distinct THE PARTS OF THE EXPOSED PLANT variety of Dicentra plant. The flower stalks are generally upright and curving, The present new variety was first developed by me in O and drooping at their ends. They are slightly branched. Pullman, Wash., and there asexually reproduced by me Generally they are adequate to support the foliage and by root division. blooms well. The color of both the old and new foliage is blue The new variety was developed by an intentional cross green, comparable to Chrysocolla green, RHS 56/3. It is pollination made by the transfer of pollen from the 5 . staminate parent Dicentra peregrina, a wild species from generally uniform both on the old and new growth. Japan, to the seed or pistillate parent Dicentra "Para The length of the flower stalks is from about fifteen mount,” U.S. -
The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School
The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Horticulture NORTHEASTERN U.S. NATIVE AND NATURALIZED PLANT PERFORMANCE IN SHADED MICROCLIMATES ON GREEN ROOFS A Thesis in Horticulture by Peter Vanco 2015 Peter Vanco Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master’s of Science August 2015 The thesis of Peter Vanco was reviewed and approved* by the following: Robert D. Berghage Associate Professor of Horticulture Thesis Advisor Eric P. Burkhart Faculty Instructor, Ecosystem Science and Management Department and Plant Science Program Director, Shaver's Creek Environmental Center Elsa S. Sánchez Associate Professor of Horticultural Systems Management Rich P. Marini Professor of Horticulture Head of the Department of Horticulture *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT Being comprised of thin, porous, heat-retentive media, and being exposed to wind and sun, green roofs are typically hot and droughty. As such, green roofs are taxing environments for the plants which inhabit them. There exist, however, various microclimates on many roofs which may provide growing conditions different from those on a typical section of green roof. One category of such microclimates is shaded areas. The goal of this thesis was to explore the possibilities available in these areas to non- traditional green roof plant species. Fifteen species of plants, twelve of which are native to the Northeastern United States, were chosen to be grown in both shaded an non-shaded conditions on a green roof with two sections, one being nominally four inches, and one being nominally six inches thick. Four replicates were included in the resultant four treatment groups, with each plant being allotted a 75cm x 75cm area in which to grow for one year. -
Ontogenetic Studies on the Determination of the Apical Meristem In
Ontogenetic studies on the determination of the apical meristem in racemose inflorescences D i s s e r t a t i o n Zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften Am Fachbereich Biologie Der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Kester Bull-Hereñu geb. am 19.07.1979 in Santiago Mainz, 2010 CONTENTS SUMMARY OF THE THESIS............................................................................................ 1 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG.................................................................................................. 2 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... 3 1.1 Historical treatment of the terminal flower production in inflorescences....... 3 1.2 Structural understanding of the TF................................................................... 4 1.3 Parallel evolution of the character states referring the TF............................... 5 1.4 Matter of the thesis.......................................................................................... 6 2 DEVELOPMENTAL CONDITIONS FOR TERMINAL FLOWER PRODUCTION IN APIOID UMBELLETS...................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction...................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Materials and Methods..................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Plant material.................................................................................... -
Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Contributors: Printing was made possible through the generous funding from Adkins Arboretum; Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management; Chesapeake Bay Trust; Irvine Natural Science Center; Maryland Native Plant Society; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; The Nature Conservancy, Maryland-DC Chapter; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Reviewers: species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Weigand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project. -
Species Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011
Appendix F - Species Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011 U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Region Species Diversity Report George Washington National Forest April 2011 Appendix F - Species Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.0 Species Diversity..................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Ecosystem Context for Species ............................................................................................ 5 2.2 Identification and Screening of Species ............................................................................... 6 3.0 Threatened and Endangered Species ................................................................................... 7 3.1 Threatened and Endangered Species List ............................................................................ 7 3.2 Threatened and Endangered Species Descriptions and Plan Components .......................... 8 3.2.1 Indiana Bat ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.2.2 Virginia Big-Eared Bat .................................................................................................. -
An Encyclopedia of Shade Perennials This Page Intentionally Left Blank an Encyclopedia of Shade Perennials
An Encyclopedia of Shade Perennials This page intentionally left blank An Encyclopedia of Shade Perennials W. George Schmid Timber Press Portland • Cambridge All photographs are by the author unless otherwise noted. Copyright © 2002 by W. George Schmid. All rights reserved. Published in 2002 by Timber Press, Inc. Timber Press The Haseltine Building 2 Station Road 133 S.W. Second Avenue, Suite 450 Swavesey Portland, Oregon 97204, U.S.A. Cambridge CB4 5QJ, U.K. ISBN 0-88192-549-7 Printed in Hong Kong Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schmid, Wolfram George. An encyclopedia of shade perennials / W. George Schmid. p. cm. ISBN 0-88192-549-7 1. Perennials—Encyclopedias. 2. Shade-tolerant plants—Encyclopedias. I. Title. SB434 .S297 2002 635.9′32′03—dc21 2002020456 I dedicate this book to the greatest treasure in my life, my family: Hildegarde, my wife, friend, and supporter for over half a century, and my children, Michael, Henry, Hildegarde, Wilhelmina, and Siegfried, who with their mates have given us ten grandchildren whose eyes not only see but also appreciate nature’s riches. Their combined love and encouragement made this book possible. This page intentionally left blank Contents Foreword by Allan M. Armitage 9 Acknowledgments 10 Part 1. The Shady Garden 11 1. A Personal Outlook 13 2. Fated Shade 17 3. Practical Thoughts 27 4. Plants Assigned 45 Part 2. Perennials for the Shady Garden A–Z 55 Plant Sources 339 U.S. Department of Agriculture Hardiness Zone Map 342 Index of Plant Names 343 Color photographs follow page 176 7 This page intentionally left blank Foreword As I read George Schmid’s book, I am reminded that all gardeners are kindred in spirit and that— regardless of their roots or knowledge—the gardening they do and the gardens they create are always personal. -
Large-Scale Propagation and Production of Native Woodland Perennials 313
Large-Scale Propagation and Production of Native Woodland Perennials 313 Large-Scale Propagation and Production of Native Woodland Perennials© William Cullina New England Wild Flower Society, 180 Hemenway Rd, Framingham, Massachusetts, 01701 U.S.A. Email: [email protected] Native woodland perennials are a source of frustration for propagators, because is- sues concerning seed viability, extended germination times, and slow and seasonal growth of seedlings discourage large-scale propagation and production. However, with proper seed handling and pretreatments as well as a “liner” approach to pro- duction, I believe that large-scale production is possible and profitable. INTRODUCTION The demand for native plants grows greater every year. Access to improved culti- vars, increasing sophistication on the part of the gardening public, and increased interest from government and the commercial sector have all contributed to this phenomenon. Many species can be easily and quickly produced from cuttings or seed (i.e., Asteraceae, Scrophulariaceae, etc.), but others — especially the woodland wildflowers commonly known as spring ephemerals — have proved especially dif- ficult to accommodate in large-scale perennial production. Genera such asTrillium, Cypripedium, Polygonatum, and Hepatica, while outstanding garden subjects that command premium prices, have developed a reputation for recalcitrance that is only partly deserved. Woodland wildflowers and bulbs are still supplied primar- ily as bare root, wild-collected stock. Thankfully, this questionable practice is now looked down upon by most of the perennial industry and consumers alike. Although collected plants are extremely cheap, we have found through experience that consumers will pay premium prices for genuinely nursery-raised material if it is available as an alternative. -
Plant in the Spotlight
TheThe AmericanAmerican GARDENERGARDENER® TheThe MagazineMagazine ofof thethe AAmericanmerican HorticulturalHorticultural SocietySociety March / April 2010 Beautiful, Durable Baptisias Coniferous Groundcovers DynamicDynamic DuetsDuets Agaves for Small Spaces forfor ShadeShade contents Volume 89, Number 2 . March / April 2010 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 5 NOTES FROM RIVER FARM 6 MEMBERS’ FORUM 8 NEWS FROM AHS Allan Armitage to host AHS webinar, River Farm Spring Garden Market in April, AHS National Children & Youth Garden Symposium goes to California, AHS to participate in 4th annual Washington, D.C.-area Garden Fest, 2010 AHS President’s Council Members Trip to Florida. 14 AHS NEWS SPECIAL 2010 Great American Gardeners National Award winners and 2010 Book Award winners. 42 ONE ON ONE WITH… page 36 Steven Still: Herbaceous perennial expert. 44 HOMEGROWN HARVEST A bumper crop of broccoli. 18 DYNAMIC DUETS FOR SHADE BY KRIS WETHERBEE Light up shady areas of the garden by using plant combinations 46 GARDENER’S NOTEBOOK that offer complementary textures and colors. Mt. Cuba Center releases coneflower evaluation results, AMERICAN BEAUTIES: study shows bumble bee 24 page 24 populations declining, BAPTISIAS BY RICHARD HAWKE GreatPlants® and Perennial The release of new cultivars of Plant Association name 2010 false indigo has renewed garden- Plants of the Year, Berry ers’ interest in the genus Baptisia. Botanic Garden to close, Jane Pepper retires as president of page 46 GROUND-COVERING Pennsylvania Horticultural 30 Society. CONIFERS BY PENELOPE O’SULLIVAN 50 GREEN GARAGE® Reduce maintenance and add Garden gloves. vibrant color and texture to the garden by using low-growing 52 BOOK REVIEWS conifers as groundcovers. What’s Wrong with My Plant? (And How Do I Fix It?); Homegrown Vegetables, Fruits, and Herbs; The Vegetable Gardener’s Bible; and 36 AGAVES FOR SMALL GARDENS BY MARY IRISH The Encyclopedia of Herbs. -
Native Plants of Maryland: What, When and Where
Home and Garden Mimeo HG#120 3/2005 Native Plants of Maryland: What, When and Where Eupatorium Cercis fistulosum canadensis Monarda didyma Rhododendron periclymenoides Tradescantia virginiana Tiarella cordifolia Rudbeckia hirta Lobelia cardinalis TABLE OF CONTENTS What are Native Plants ....................................... 2 Plant listings by preferred conditions .......... 15-20 Physiographic Map of Maryland ........................ 2 Plant Common Name Index ......................... 20-22 Invasive Non Natives .......................................... 3 References ........................................................ 23 Plant listing by type and preferences ............ 4-14 Glossary ............................................................ 23 Native Plants for Maryland INTRODUCTION WHAT ARE GROWTH CONDITIONS FOR NATIVE PLANTS? This guide is intended to help in the selection of native plants for habitat restoration, Maryland is host to a wide variety of native plants. This is due to the diversity of geo- critical area buffer management and natural landscaping projects. All of these plants graphical and climatic conditions. The state is divided into three physiographic regions are native to Maryland. Each section lists plants in alphabetical order by their Latin coastal, piedmont and mountain. You may use the map below to determine your region. names. Common names are included and are cross-referenced in the index. Growth conditions and plant characteristics are also included. State of Maryland Physiographic Regions WHAT ARE NATIVE PLANTS? A native plant is a species that originates or occurs naturally in a particular region. As our local habitat is disturbed by development, non-native and invasive plants change the character of our landscapes. Although many naturalized but introduced plants occur in most regions, the native plants listed are species that existed in Maryland when the European settlers arrived, or they are cultivars of these species.