Circular Economy and Bioeconomy Interaction Development As Future for Rural Regions. Case Study of Aizkraukle Region in Latvia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Health Systems in Transition
61575 Latvia HiT_2_WEB.pdf 1 03/03/2020 09:55 Vol. 21 No. 4 2019 Vol. Health Systems in Transition Vol. 21 No. 4 2019 Health Systems in Transition: in Transition: Health Systems C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Latvia Latvia Health system review Daiga Behmane Alina Dudele Anita Villerusa Janis Misins The Observatory is a partnership, hosted by WHO/Europe, which includes other international organizations (the European Commission, the World Bank); national and regional governments (Austria, Belgium, Finland, Kristine Klavina Ireland, Norway, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the Veneto Region of Italy); other health system organizations (the French National Union of Health Insurance Funds (UNCAM), the Dzintars Mozgis Health Foundation); and academia (the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and the Giada Scarpetti London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)). The Observatory has a secretariat in Brussels and it has hubs in London at LSE and LSHTM) and at the Berlin University of Technology. HiTs are in-depth profiles of health systems and policies, produced using a standardized approach that allows comparison across countries. They provide facts, figures and analysis and highlight reform initiatives in progress. Print ISSN 1817-6119 Web ISSN 1817-6127 61575 Latvia HiT_2_WEB.pdf 2 03/03/2020 09:55 Giada Scarpetti (Editor), and Ewout van Ginneken (Series editor) were responsible for this HiT Editorial Board Series editors Reinhard Busse, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Josep Figueras, European -
All Latvia Cemetery List-Final-By First Name#2
All Latvia Cemetery List by First Name Given Name and Grave Marker Information Family Name Cemetery ? d. 1904 Friedrichstadt/Jaunjelgava ? b. Itshak d. 1863 Friedrichstadt/Jaunjelgava ? b. Abraham 1900 Jekabpils ? B. Chaim Meir Potash Potash Kraslava ? B. Eliazar d. 5632 Ludza ? B. Haim Zev Shuvakov Shuvakov Ludza ? b. Itshak Katz d. 1850 Katz Friedrichstadt/Jaunjelgava ? B. Shalom d. 5634 Ludza ? bar Abraham d. 5662 Varaklani ? Bar David Shmuel Bombart Bombart Ludza ? bar Efraim Shmethovits Shmethovits Rezekne ? Bar Haim Kafman d. 5680 Kafman Varaklani ? bar Menahem Mane Zomerman died 5693 Zomerman Rezekne ? bar Menahem Mendel Rezekne ? bar Yehuda Lapinski died 5677 Lapinski Rezekne ? Bat Abraham Telts wife of Lipman Liver 1906 Telts Liver Kraslava ? bat ben Tzion Shvarbrand d. 5674 Shvarbrand Varaklani ? d. 1875 Pinchus Judelson d. 1923 Judelson Friedrichstadt/Jaunjelgava ? d. 5608 Pilten ?? Bloch d. 1931 Bloch Karsava ?? Nagli died 5679 Nagli Rezekne ?? Vechman Vechman Rezekne ??? daughter of Yehuda Hirshman 7870-30 Hirshman Saldus ?meret b. Eliazar Ludza A. Broido Dvinsk/Daugavpils A. Blostein Dvinsk/Daugavpils A. Hirschman Hirschman Rīga A. Perlman Perlman Windau Aaron Zev b. Yehiskiel d. 1910 Friedrichstadt/Jaunjelgava Aba Ostrinsky Dvinsk/Daugavpils Aba b. Moshe Skorobogat? Skorobogat? Karsava Aba b. Yehuda Hirshberg 1916 Hirshberg Tukums Aba Koblentz 1891-30 Koblentz Krustpils Aba Leib bar Ziskind d. 5678 Ziskind Varaklani Aba Yehuda b. Shrago died 1880 Riebini Aba Yehuda Leib bar Abraham Rezekne Abarihel?? bar Eli died 1866 Jekabpils Abay Abay Kraslava Abba bar Jehuda 1925? 1890-22 Krustpils Abba bar Jehuda died 1925 film#1890-23 Krustpils Abba Haim ben Yehuda Leib 1885 1886-1 Krustpils Abba Jehuda bar Mordehaj Hakohen 1899? 1890-9 hacohen Krustpils Abba Ravdin 1889-32 Ravdin Krustpils Abe bar Josef Kaitzner 1960 1883-1 Kaitzner Krustpils Abe bat Feivish Shpungin d. -
CSDD 2018/29 ERAF 3.Pielikums CSDD Rīkotā Iepirkuma Nolikumam
CSDD 2018/29 ERAF 3.pielikums CSDD rīkotā iepirkuma nolikumam STACIJAS atrašanās vietas shēma Adrese: Rīgas iela 4, Aloja, Alojas nov., LV-4064 Nekustamā īpašuma kadastra apzīmējums: 66070030032 1 CSDD 2018/29 ERAF STACIJAS atrašanās vietas shēma Adrese: Raiņa iela 4, Auce, Auces nov., LV-3708 Nekustamā īpašuma kadastra apzīmējums: 46050090910 2 CSDD 2018/29 ERAF STACIJAS atrašanās vietas shēma Adrese: Zvaigžņu iela 2A, Aizpute, Aizputes nov., LV-3456 Nekustamā īpašuma kadastra apzīmējums: 64050070090 3 CSDD 2018/29 ERAF STACIJAS atrašanās vietas shēma Adrese: Dārza iela 25A, Bērzpils, Bērzpils pag., Balvu nov., LV-4576 Nekustamā īpašuma kadastra apzīmējums: 38500020281 4 CSDD 2018/29 ERAF STACIJAS atrašanās vietas shēma Nosaukums: "Automašīnu stāvlaukums pie baznīcas", Dundagas pagasts, Dundagas novads Nekustamā īpašuma kadastra apzīmējums: 88500200209 5 CSDD 2018/29 ERAF STACIJAS atrašanās vietas shēma Adrese: Lāčplēša iela 11, Jaunjelgava, Jaunjelgavas nov., LV-5134 Nekustamā īpašuma kadastra apzīmējums: 32070020388 6 CSDD 2018/29 ERAF STACIJAS atrašanās vietas shēma Nosaukums: "5.noliktavas caurlaide", Kolkas pagasts, Dundagas novads Nekustamā īpašuma kadastra apzīmējums: 88620070260 7 CSDD 2018/29 ERAF STACIJAS atrašanās vietas shēma Nosaukums: "Pils iela 8B", Mālpils novads Nekustamā īpašuma kadastra apzīmējums: 80740030845 8 CSDD 2018/29 ERAF STACIJAS atrašanās vietas shēma Adrese: Rīgas iela 26B, Vecumnieki, Vecumnieku pag., Vecumnieku nov., LV-3933 Nekustamā īpašuma kadastra apzīmējums: 40940120980 9 CSDD 2018/29 ERAF STACIJAS -
Factors Affecting and Determining Local Depopulation
FOLIA GEOGRAPHICA XVIII NEW GEOGRAPHIES OF WELLBEING: NATURE, RESOURCES, POPULATIONS AND MOBILITIES FACTORS AFFECTING AND DETERMINING LOCAL DEPOPULATION Faktori, kas ietekmē un nosaka iedzīvotāju skaita lokālo pieaugumu un samazinājumu Eduards Zarins, Juris Paiders University of Latvia, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences [email protected] Abstract. This paper analyses the factors that influence and determine the local population growth and decrease in rural areas of Latvia based on population changes at micro level (1x1 km square grid areas) in 2000–2018. Quantitative analysis of the spatial structure of the population was carried out in three reference territories. Results suggest that the proportion of territories with population increase in Latvian municipalities (2000–2018) has a very strong and statistically significant correlation to population changes (2000–2018) in the respective municipality. This may lead to the conclusion that the influence of other factors on the location of the territories in the spatial structure of the municipality where population growth is observed is not statistically significant. Keywords: population geography, population changes, spatial population structure DOI: 10.22364/fg.18.2 Introduction Population shrinkage is a significant problem for Latvia. The main cause of population decrease in Latvia is migration. Migration and its influencing factors are an important area of research in population geography (Bērziņš et al. 2018). The territorial disparities of migration have received the attention of many researchers in Latvia (e.g. Krisjane et al. 2017; Zhitin et al. 2018; Arbidane & Markevica 2016; Göler et al. 2014; Apsite et al. 2012; Krisjane & Berzins 2012) and in the European context (Poot et al. -
Annual Report 2010
1 Republic of Latvia Ministry of Finance (the National Coordination Unit) European Union Funds Monitoring Department Annual Report on the Implementation of the Swiss–Latvian Cooperation Programme in Latvia April 2010 – March 2011 Riga March 2011 2 Glossary of Acronyms AIPY – the Agency for International Programs for Youth CFCA – the Central Finance and Contracting Agency CFRR – the World Bank Centre for Financial Reporting Reform CRUS – the Rectors’ Conference of the Swiss Universities Embassy – the Embassy of Switzerland in Latvia EU – European Union Framework Agreement – the Framework Agreement between the Swiss Federal Council and the Government of the Republic of Latvia concerning the implementation of the Swiss- Latvian Cooperation Programme to reduce economic and social disparities within the enlarged European Union FRTAP – Financial Reporting Technical Assistance Project IFRS – International Financial Reporting Standards ISA – International Standards on Auditing MoF – the Ministry of Finance MoES – the Ministry of Education and Science NCU – the National Coordination Unit PPF – the Project Preparation Facility SDC – the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SECO – the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs SIF – the Society Integration Foundation SEDA – the State Education Development Agency SES – the State Environment Service SRDA – the State Regional Development Agency Steering committee – the Swiss-Latvian Cooperation Programmes’ Steering committee Swiss Programme – the Swiss-Latvian Cooperation Programme TAF – the Technical -
Elektrum Row, Thus Remaining the Cornerstone of the Latvian Energy Supply Brand in Compliance with Its Chosen Operational Strategy
Sustainability and Annual Report 2019 How to Use the Report GRI indicators disclosed in the section AboutReturn Latvenergo to Group the Contents page GRI 102-48, 102-49, 102-50, 102-51, 102-52, 102-53, 102-54 – Foreword – About the Report About the Report – About the Group – Group Strategy Reporting period 1 January 2019 – 31 December 2019 Reporting frequency Annually, since 2009, in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Guidelines. – Corporate Social About Latvenergo Group Responsibility Publication date 8 April 2020 – Foreword Publication date of the previous report 17 April 2019 – Awards – About the Report Navigate Global Reporting Initiative The Sustainability Report 2019 has been prepared in accordance with the GRI Standards Core level requirements and includes non-financial – About the Group information as stated by Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and the Law on the Financial Instruments Market. between sections – Group Strategy Corporate Governance Scope of the report The report discloses information about Latvenergo Group (see the section About the Group). – Corporate Social Responsibility Content of the report The report discloses information about the topics and indicators that are important to the operations and sustainability of the Group. Link to an external source General Standard Disclosures are fully covered according to the GRI Standards Core level requirements. Based on the materiality assessment, Operating Segments – Awards 16 material topics relevant to the sustainability of the Group and 31 Specific Standard Disclosures are disclosed (see the GRI Index table). or another section in the report The report preparation process is described in the section Materiality Assessment. -
The Saeima (Parliament) Election
/pub/public/30067.html Legislation / The Saeima Election Law Unofficial translation Modified by amendments adopted till 14 July 2014 As in force on 19 July 2014 The Saeima has adopted and the President of State has proclaimed the following law: The Saeima Election Law Chapter I GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Citizens of Latvia who have reached the age of 18 by election day have the right to vote. (As amended by the 6 February 2014 Law) 2.(Deleted by the 6 February 2014 Law). 3. A person has the right to vote in any constituency. 4. Any citizen of Latvia who has reached the age of 21 before election day may be elected to the Saeima unless one or more of the restrictions specified in Article 5 of this Law apply. 5. Persons are not to be included in the lists of candidates and are not eligible to be elected to the Saeima if they: 1) have been placed under statutory trusteeship by the court; 2) are serving a court sentence in a penitentiary; 3) have been convicted of an intentionally committed criminal offence except in cases when persons have been rehabilitated or their conviction has been expunged or vacated; 4) have committed a criminal offence set forth in the Criminal Law in a state of mental incapacity or a state of diminished mental capacity or who, after committing a criminal offence, have developed a mental disorder and thus are incapable of taking or controlling a conscious action and as a result have been subjected to compulsory medical measures, or whose cases have been dismissed without applying such compulsory medical measures; 5) belong -
Gradients of Latvian Magnetic Anomalies
Scientific Journal of Riga Technical University Sustainable Spatial Development 2011 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Volume 2 Gradients of Latvian Magnetic Anomalies Vladimir Vertennikov, Riga Technical University Abstract. This article discusses one of the most important and vertical gradients. It is possible to determine those geophysical factors, which produces an impact on the gradients by calculations or measurements using special demographic processes and reflects the nature of variability in instruments – magnetic gradiometers. Instrumented gradient the anomalous magnetic field intensity in space. The article characterises the horizontal magnetic gradients, which vary measurements are predominantly utilised in local areas during within the wide range: from 10 to 2400 nT/km. It distinguishes prospecting and exploration for minerals. In regional magnetic scale and magnetic gradient areas. The article gives an investigations, to which concrete operations associated with ecodemographic evaluation of the territory of Latvia by the investigating the impact of geophysical factors on gradience of the anomalous magnetic field. demographic processes belong, horizontal gradients are the main factor; they are determined by calculations. Keywords: horizontal magnetic gradient, magnetic scale, magnetic gradient area, ecodemographic evaluation of territory by magnetic gradience. CHARACTERISATION OF HORIZONTAL MAGNETIC GRADIENTS The magnetic field is represented in the Latvian territory by a complex set of anomalies with different signs, intensity, size The gradient is an important parameter of anomalous and morphology. The transitions from one anomaly to another magnetic field. The discussion deals with the spatial intensity are expressed through changes in the field intensity and are variations. The thing is that the intensity of the anomalous either gradual, occurring step-by-step, or abrupt. -
Plūdu Riska Novērtēšanas Un Pārvaldības Nacionālā Programma 2008.-2015.Gadam
Approved by Cabinet Order No.830 20 December 2007 National Programme for the Assessment and Management of Flood Risks 2008 - 2015 Informative Part Riga 2007 Translation © 2013 Valsts valodas centrs (State Language Centre) Contents Abbreviations Used 3 Terms used in the Programme 3 I. Characterisation of the Situation 4 1. Assessment of the Territory of Latvia in Respect of Flood Risks 7 1.1. Types of Flood Risk Areas in the Territory of Latvia 7 1.2. Causes of Floods in Flood Risk Areas 8 1.3. Areas Being Flooded Due to Floods and Areas at Risk of Flooding 9 1.4. Specially Protected Nature Territories 12 1.5. Historical Consequences and Material Losses of Floods 12 2. Flood Risk Scenarios and Assessment Criteria Thereof 13 II. Link of the Programme to the Priorities and Supporting Policy Documents of the Government and Ministries 15 III. Objectives and Sub-objectives of the Programme 17 IV. Planned Results of the Programme Policy and Results of the Activity 17 V. The Result-based Indicators for the Achievement of Results of the Programme Policy and Results of Activity 18 VI. Main Tasks for the Achievement of Results of the Programme 18 VII Programme Funding 18 Annexes 1. Annex 1 River Basin Districts of Latvia 20 2. Annex 2 Flood Risk Areas in River Potamal Sections 21 3. Annex 3 Coastal Flood Risk and Coastal Erosion Risk Areas of the Baltic Sea and the Gulf of Riga 25 4. Annex 4 Measures for the Assessment and Reduction of Flood Risks 26 Translation © 2013 Valsts valodas centrs (State Language Centre) 2 Abbreviations Used MoE – Ministry of Economics MoF – Ministry of Finance MoENV – Ministry of Environment MoA – Ministry of Agriculture EU – European Union HPS – Hydroelectric power station UNECE – United Nations Economic Commission for Europe a/g - agriculture mBs – metres in the Baltic system ha - hectare Terms Used in the Programme Flood – the covering by water of land not normally covered by water. -
Annual Report on the Year 2011 by Ombudsman of the Republic of Latvia
Annual Report on the year 2011 by Ombudsman of the Republic of Latvia Riga, 2012 2 Preamble by the Ombudsman ........................................................................... 7 Protection of the Rights of children .................................................................. 10 What are the rights of children? ............................................................................................... 10 Priorities in the field of the rights of children ........................................................................... 10 I. Children in state social care facilities (nursing homes)...................................... 11 1. The right of child to grow up in family................................................................................. 11 2. The right of child with special needs to grow up in family.................................................... 13 3. Ensuring of the right of siblings to be not separated ............................................................. 14 4. Number of children accomodated at PSCCs and their right to qualitative care...................... 15 5. Alternative forms of care...................................................................................................... 16 6. Social work with a family .................................................................................................... 18 7. Immediate steps to be taken to ensure the right of children to grow up in family or to ensure family-based care.................................................................................................................... -
(UN/LOCODE) for Latvia
United Nations Code for Trade and Transport Locations (UN/LOCODE) for Latvia N.B. To check the official, current database of UN/LOCODEs see: https://www.unece.org/cefact/locode/service/location.html UN/LOCODE Location Name State Functionality Status Coordinatesi LV 6LV Alsunga 006 Road terminal; Recognised location 5659N 02134E LV AGL Aglona 001 Road terminal; Recognised location 5608N 02701E LV AIN Ainazi 054 Port; Code adopted by IATA or ECLAC 5752N 02422E LV AIZ Aizkraukle 002 Port; Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 5636N 02513E LV AKI Akniste JKB Road terminal; Multimodal function, ICD etc.; Recognised location 5610N 02545E LV ALJ Aloja 005 Road terminal; Recognised location 5746N 02452E LV AMT Amata 008 Road terminal; Recognised location 5712N 02509E LV APE Aizpute 003 Road terminal; Recognised location 5643N 02136E LV APP Ape 007 Road terminal; Recognised location 5732N 02640E LV ARX Avoti RIX Road terminal; Recognised location 5658N 02350E LV ASE Aluksne 002 Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 5725N 02703E LV AUC Auce 010 Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 5628N 02254E LV B8R Balozi 052 Road terminal; Recognised location 5652N 02407E LV B9G Baldone 013 Port; Road terminal; Recognised location 5644N 02423E LV BAB Babite 079 Road terminal; Recognised location 5657N 02357E LV BAL Balvi 015 Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 5708N 02715W LV BAU Bauska 016 Rail terminal; Road terminal; Recognised location 5624N 02411E LV BLN Baltinava 014 Road terminal; Recognised location -
Nepcon CB Public Summary Report V1.0 First Surveillance
NEPCon Evaluation of Latgran SIA – Jaunjelgava Compliance with the SBP Framework: Public Summary Report First Surveillance Audit www.sbp-cert.org Focusing on sustainable sourcing solutions Completed in accordance with the CB Public Summary Report Template Version 1.0 For further information on the SBP Framework and to view the full set of documentation see www.sbp-cert.org Document history Version 1.0: published 26 March 2015 © CopyriGht The Sustainable Biomass Partnership Limited 2015 NEPCon Evaluation of Latgran – Jaunjelgava: Public Summary Report, First Surveillance Audit Page ii Focusing on sustainable sourcing solutions Contents 1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Scope of the evaluation and SBP certificate ...................................................................................... 2 3 Specific objective .................................................................................................................................. 4 4 SBP Standards utilised ......................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 SBP Standards utilised ........................................................................................................................... 5 4.2 SBP-endorsed Regional Risk Assessment ............................................................................................. 5 5 Description of Biomass producer,