31 Food & Wine
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Brexit - Deal Or No Deal – What Does This Mean for Your IP?
TRADE MARKS Brexit - Deal or no deal – what does this mean for your IP? In March this year the UK and the European Commission issued a joint working document which includes guidance on IP issues post Brexit which Barker Brettell commented on here. In that document there is provision for the automatic extension of any granted EU rights to the UK post Brexit and for an application process for the continuation of any pending EU applications into additional UK applications. This joint working document made it clear that although the UK is due to leave the European Union on the 29th March 2019, provided that the UK and the EU arrive at an exit agreement there will be a transition period through to the 31st December 2020, throughout which EU law will still apply within the UK. On the 24th September, mindful of the increasing speculation regarding a ‘no deal’ Brexit, the UK government issued a number of technical notes. The UK government made it clear that it will make unilateral provision for the continuation of all EU rights in the UK if no deal is struck and that those provisions will mirror the joint working document. In such a ‘no deal’ scenario however, the transitional provisions taking us to the end of 2020 will not apply. Rights would be impacted as of the exit date. It could be ‘business as usual’ for IP until the end of 2020 and indeed patents are unaffected by Brexit, however businesses need to be aware of the implications going forward and to consider what action can be taken now to minimise any risks and potential costs. -
BOD-11.19.2019.Pdf
TENNESSEE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS November 19, 2019 Pursuant to the call of the Chair, the Tennessee Housing Development Agency Board of Directors (the "Board") met in regular session on Tuesday, November 19, 2019, at 1:00 p.m., in the Nashville Room of the William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower Building, Nashville, Tennessee. The following Board members were present: Mike Hedges (Chair); Dorothy Cleaves; John Krenson; Kevin Bradley for Treasurer David Lillard; Colleen Daniels for Commissioner of Finance & Administration Stuart McWhorter; Austin McMullen; Erin Merrick; Rick Neal; Chrissi Rhea; John Snodderly; Secretary of State Tre Hargett; and Katie Armstrong for Comptroller Justin Wilson. Those absent were: Daisy Fields; Regina Hubbard; and Lynn Tully. Ralph M. Perrey, THDA Executive Director, recognized the following THDA staff members for their years of service: Terry Benier Single Family 5 years Kenyell Chalmers Community Programs 5 years Nekishia Potter Community Programs 5 years Kilolo Dunmore Internal Audit 5 years Patrick Adams Single Family 5 years LaMar Brooks Section 8 Contract Admin 10 years Joe Bethel Multifamily Programs 10 years Patrick Harrell Information Technology 10 years Cindy Ripley Executive 10 years Robert Lucas Multifamily Programs 10 years Kristy Allen Information Technology 15 years Valeri Allen Community Programs 20 years Caroline Rhodes Single Family Loan Ops 20 years Sharon Palmer Accounting 25 years Mr. Perrey also recognized the following veterans for their military service: Kavin Williams Marines Bill Lord Marines Mike Costa Navy Melva Boyd Air Force Stephanie Bounds Army John Krenson (Board Member) Army Seeing a physical quorum present, Chair Hedges called the meeting to order and offered a time for public comment. -
Risk Aversion: Deal Or No Deal? Outline
Risk Aversion: Deal or No Deal? Outline ¨ Risk Attitude and Expected Return ¨ Game: Deal or No Deal? Risk Attitude and Expected Return ¨ In each pair, please choose an asset out of the two options. ¨ A: Option 1: 50%: 100; 50%: 50 vs. Option 2: 100%: 60 ¨ B: Option 1: 50%: 100; 50%: 50 vs. Option 2: 100%: 70 ¨ C: Option 1: 50%: 100; 50%: 50 vs. Option 2: 100%: 75 ¨ D: Option 1: 50%: 100; 50%: 50 vs. Option 2: 100%: 80 ¨ E: Option 1: 50%: 100; 50%: 50 vs. Option 2: 100%: 90 Risk Attitude and Expected Return ¨ Expected value n Expected Value = ∑Pi ⋅ X i i=1 Risk Attitude and Expected Return ¨ Risk Aversion: a dislike of uncertainty 1. If your choice is (2,2,2,2,2), (1,2,2,2,2), (1,1,2,2,2), you are risk-averse. 2. If your choice is (1,1,1,1,1), (2,2,2,2,1) or (2,2,2,1,1), you are risk-loving. 3. If your choice is (1,1,1or2,2,2), you are risk-neutral. Indifferent Game: Deal or No Deal ¨ I am sure most of you have heard about the TV show – Deal or No Deal. If you haven’t, the youtube videos below give you an idea of how this game is played: ¨ Deal or No Deal (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmZFHjQfx-o&feature=related) ¨ First 1 million winner (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gg7vtTCAkbY&feature=related) Game: Deal or No Deal ¨ We are going to play a simplified version of the game. -
Limitations on Copyright Protection for Format Ideas in Reality Television Programming
For exclusive use of MLRC members and other parties specifically authorized by MLRC. © Media Law Resource Center, Inc. LIMITATIONS ON COPYRIGHT PROTECTION FOR FORMAT IDEAS IN REALITY TELEVISION PROGRAMMING By Kent R. Raygor and Edwin Komen* * Kent R. Raygor and Edwin Komen are partners in the Entertainment, Media, and Technology Group in the Century City, California and Washington, D.C. offices, respectively, of Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP. The authors thank Ben Aigboboh, an associate in the Century City office, for his assistance with this article. 97 For exclusive use of MLRC members and other parties specifically authorized by MLRC. © Media Law Resource Center, Inc. LIMITATIONS ON COPYRIGHT PROTECTION FOR FORMAT IDEAS IN REALITY TELEVISION PROGRAMMING I. INTRODUCTION Television networks constantly compete to find and produce the next big hit. The shifting economic landscape forged by increasing competition between and among ever-proliferating media platforms, however, places extreme pressure on network profit margins. Fully scripted hour-long dramas and half-hour comedies have become increasingly costly, while delivering diminishing ratings in the key demographics most valued by advertisers. It therefore is not surprising that the reality television genre has become a staple of network schedules. New reality shows are churned out each season.1 The main appeal, of course, is that they are cheap to make and addictive to watch. Networks are able to take ordinary people and create a show without having to pay “A-list” actor salaries and hire teams of writers.2 Many of the most popular programs are unscripted, meaning lower cost for higher ratings. Even where the ratings are flat, such shows are capable of generating higher profit margins through advertising directed to large groups of more readily targeted viewers. -
Businesses' Views on the Endgame of the Brexit Negotiations
‘Deal or No Deal?’ Businesses’ Views on the Endgame of the Brexit Negotiations Ed Balls, Peter Sands Emily Benn, Kevin Ferriter, Tobias Garnett, Eleanor Hallam, Sebastian Leape, Nyasha Weinberg M-RCBG Associate Working Paper Series | No. 101 The views expressed in the M-RCBG Associate Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business & Government or of Harvard University. The papers in this series have not undergone formal review and approval; they are presented to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for non-commercial use only. 2 Table of Contents Abstract 4 Acknowledgements 4 Affiliations 4 Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 10 2. Where We Stand Now 12 3. The Impact of Uncertainty 15 4. There is Consensus that “No Deal” Would Be Extremely Damaging 27 5. Though Better Than "No Deal", The Government's Draft Withdrawal Agreement / Draft Political Declaration Means Contuinuing Damaging Uncertainty 33 6. Most Businesses Would Prefer a Closer Relationship with the EU than That Envisaged in the Draft Withdrawal Agreement / Draft Political Declaration 42 7. Conclusion 50 Appendix 53 List of Interviewees 53 Bibliography 55 3 Abstract Brexit presents profound changes for British businesses: from how they trade, to how they are regulated and how they employ people. This paper represents the fourth phase of a research project in a series examining the impact of Brexit on small and medium-sized British businesses, examining their views as we reach the endgame in the Brexit negotiations, with the publication of the Government's Draft Withdrawal Agreement (“DWA”) and Draft Political Declaration (“DPD”). -
The Influence of Personal Characteristics and Reference Dependence in Risky Decision-Making for a High-Stakes Game Show
Name: Robin Rietveldt Student Number: 329975 Date: 27/06/2012 The influence of personal characteristics and reference dependence in risky decision-making for a high-stakes game show By Robin Rietveldt Erasmus University, Erasmus School of Economics _____________________________________________________________________ Abstract This paper takes a look at the decision-making of contestants in the game show “De Postcode Loterij Miljoenenjacht”, the format that is also known as “Deal or No Deal” in countries outside The Netherlands. I have sampled 41 episodes looking for differences in decision-making caused by gender and age. No significant effects were found but this might be related to the fact that the semi final has characteristics of a “selection round”. In addition I looked for signs of reference dependence in the data. The data showed “Winners” and “Losers” were less likely to deal compared to their “Neutral” counterparts. This proves that the course of the game is relevant to what decision a contestant will make at the end of the round. My theory for “Winners” not only includes effects of reference dependence but also the overvaluation of small probabilities. Keywords Decision making under risk; game show; risk preferences; risk aversion; prospect theory; deal or no deal _____________________________________________________________________ Introduction If I look back on the three years of economics education and have to name one core concept of the program that was of most importance it would be decision-making. Whether it was deciding what investment to pursue, what product to buy in the market or how to decide in games according to game theory. But knowing how to optimally decide, or decide rationally, isn’t everything. -
Into a Bad Deal Strange Bedfellows Collaborate to Oppose For-Profit Prisons
REALTY CHECK Legal hurdles for unmarried buyers Sure, it’s all romantic now, but what happens to the house after the breakup. VIEW FROM THE HILL Forrest not long P3 for Capitol Hill? A plan to move Nathan DAVIDSONLedger • WILLIAMSON • RUTHERFORD • CHEATHAM WILSON SUMNER• ROBERTSON • MAURY • DICKSONBedford • MONTGOMERY Forrest bust to state museum gains traction. the music of P3 with the Tennessee finds itself nashville symphony FEBRUARY 15 615.687.6400 | NashvilleSymphony.org LOCKED TO 17 February 2 – 8, 2018 The power of information.NASHVILLE EDITION Vol. 44 | www.TNLedger.com Issue 5 into a bad deal FORMERLY WESTVIEW SINCE 1978 Strange bedfellows collaborate to oppose Page 13 for-profit prisons Dec.: Dec.: Keith Turner, Ratliff, Jeanan Mills Stuart, Resp.: Kimberly Dawn Wallace, Atty: Mary C Lagrone, 08/24/2010, 10P1318 In re: Jeanan Mills Stuart, Princess Angela Gates, Jeanan Mills Stuart, Princess Angela Gates,Dec.: Resp.: Kim Prince Patrick, Angelo Terry Patrick, Gates, Atty: Monica D Edwards, 08/25/2010, 10P1326 In re: Keith Turner, TN Dept Of Correction, www.westviewonline.com TN Dept Of Correction, Resp.: Johnny Moore,Dec.: Melinda Atty: Bryce L Tomlinson, Coatney, Resp.: Pltf(s): Rodney A Hall, Pltf Atty(s): n/a, 08/27/2010, 10P1336 In re: Kim Patrick, Terry Patrick, Pltf(s): Sandra Heavilon, Resp.: Jewell Tinnon, Atty: Ronald Andre Stewart, 08/24/2010,Dec.: Seton Corp 10P1322 Insurance Company, Dec.: Regions Bank, Resp.: Leigh A Collins, In re: Melinda L Tomlinson, Def(s): Jit Steel Transport Inc, National Fire Insurance Company, -
Is Deal Or No Deal Cheating Its Contestants?
OC TM Is Deal or No Deal Cheating Its Contestants? Daniel R. Shifflet, Bowling Green State University As fans of fair contests, we are lead to believe that game shows proceed with mathematical consistency. However, a slight anomaly in this basic assumption can be found while watching the game play of Deal or No Deal. During certain situations it seems like the show is cheating its contestants. Could any mathematician let this question go without further analysis? Of course not! So began an investigation into our hypothesis. Using simple statistical notions like expected value and linear regression, we show how to isolate this math- ematical irregularity and provide some evidence of its existence. What does this mean? Is foul play afoot? Read on to fi nd out. Introduction to open it. Th e amount within will be his In December 2005 a new prime time prize should he refuse all off ers by the Banker game show debuted on TV. Titled Deal or to buy the case. No Deal, the contest with mathematical What follows next is a series of rounds implications soon piqued my interests. After where the contestant chooses to open a a few viewings, I noticed a fairly dependable predetermined number of cases in play, pattern in the game play. However, I soon revealing monetary amounts that are then witnessed an episode that seemed to deviate taken out of play. At the end of each greatly from this path. How could a contest round, the Banker makes an off er to buy with thousands of dollars at stake, rooted in the contestant’s case based (somehow) on a gambling scenario, be allowed to proceed the average of the values still known to be in if it lacked mathematical consistency? In a play (the expected value of the game at that sense, it seemed that the show was “cheating” point). -
The 2008 North American International
he 2008 North American International In the cow-calf division, Matthew Compton, Livestock Exposition (NAILE) Greenfield, Ind., took top honors with SSF Tshowcased 207 Herefords during the Megan Moler 849, a March 1, 2006, daughter national Hereford show Nov. 20 in Louisville, of BR Moler ET. She showed with her May Ky. Tom Farrer, Royal Center, Ind., heifer calf by Ramsey’s Firewall. judged the event. Reserve cow-calf honors went Grand champion and spring to KEB Omega Odyssey 1ETS, yearling champion heifer honors exhibited by Oak Ledge Farm, went to William Passwaters, Belmont, N.H. The May 14, Bridgeville, Del., with Purple 2006, daughter of UPS Odyssey Cotton 40T ET. The March 26, 1ET showed with her March 2007, daughter of LaGrand Reload bull calf by KT Top Secret 1030. 80P ET was also named grand Premier breeder honor went champion in the junior show Nov. Judge Tom Farrer to Purple Reign Cattle Co., 16. Reserve grand and fall calf Toulon, Ill. Laudeman exhibited champion heifer in the open show the champion get-of-sire with Champion female drive. belonged to Kirbie Day, Waxahachie, Texas. progeny sired by CS Boomer 29F. Four L BR KLD Rose Marie D79 ET is a Sept. 18 Herefords, Atwood, Tenn., exhibited the best daughter of BR Moler ET. six head and was named premier exhibitor. Jason Laudeman, Bremen, Ind., exhibited In the junior show, reserve grand the grand and senior champion bull, SRF champion honors went to Laken Lierle, Ft. Deal or No Deal ET. He’s an Oct. 30, 2006, Cobb, Okla., with TCL Gold Laryn 402 by son of CS Boomer 29F. -
Restaurant Workers Are in Control Amid High Demand It Takes More Than Higher Pay, Perks to Prolong Their Loyalty
CLIMER COLUMN More than a share of Titans Want to buy that one-third share of the Titans? You’ll also get oil, cars and ranches. TENNESSEE TITANS There’s a catch to P22 glut of receivers Remember when the DAVIDSONLedger • WILLIAMSON • RUTHERFORD • CHEATHAM WILSON SUMNER• ROBERTSON • MAURY • DICKSONTitans • MONTGOMERY loaded up on quality receivers? Where’d they go? AP photo of Corey Davis Restaurant workers P24 Please see our ad are in control on page 11 September 8 – 14, 2017 The power of information.NASHVILLE Vol. 43 EDITION | Issue 36 amid high demand www.TNLedger.com It takes more than FORMERLY WESTVIEW SINCE 1978 higher pay, perks to prolong their loyalty Page 13 Dec.: Stories by Hollie Deese Dec.: Keith Turner, Ratliff, Jeanan Mills Stuart, Resp.: Kimberly Dawn Wallace, Atty: Mary C Lagrone, 08/24/2010, 10P1318 In re: Jeanan Mills Stuart, Princess Angela Gates, begin on page 2 Dec.: Kim Patrick, Terry Patrick, Jeanan Mills Stuart, Princess Angela Gates, Resp.: Prince Angelo Gates, Atty: Monica D Edwards, 08/25/2010, 10P1326 In re: Keith Turner, TN Dept Of Correction, www.westviewonline.com TN Dept Of Correction, Resp.: Johnny Moore,Dec.: Melinda Atty: Bryce L Tomlinson, Coatney, Resp.: Pltf(s): Rodney A Hall, Pltf Atty(s): n/a, 08/27/2010, 10P1336 In re: Kim Patrick, Terry Patrick, Pltf(s): Sandra Heavilon, Resp.: Jewell Tinnon, Atty: Ronald Andre Stewart, 08/24/2010,Dec.: Seton Corp 10P1322 Insurance Company, Dec.: Regions Bank, Resp.: Leigh A Collins, In re: Melinda L Tomlinson, Def(s): Jit Steel Transport Inc, National Fire Insurance -
Memphis, TN This Report Covers the Time Period November 1, 2005 to October 31, 2007 (Except Where Otherwise Specifically Noted)
WITI-Milwaukee, WS Page 1 WHBQ – Memphis, TN This report covers the time period November 1, 2005 to October 31, 2007 (except where otherwise specifically noted). I. PROGRAMMING: a. Local Newscasts: WHBQ-TV airs 36.5 hours of local newscasts every week: Monday-Friday 5am-9am Monday-Friday 11am-11:30am Monday through Sunday 5pm-6pm Monday through Sunday 9pm-10pm b. Breaking News: WHBQ broke into and/or preempted regularly scheduled programming in order to bring its viewers breaking news or disaster information. This coverage included reporting on severe weather warnings, amber alerts, school closings, and other emergencies. A comprehensive list of cut-ins and crawls is attached as Exhibit 1. c. Local News Stories: Provided below is a brief summary of important local news stories covered by WHBQ during its local newscasts: • The murder of a local pastor and the subsequent arrest of his wife made local and national headlines. • Arrest of Memphis Councilman Rickey Peete for allegedly accepting bribes • Community reaction to proposals to close/rezone eight inner city schools • Crackdown by local law enforcement • Death of Bishop G.E. Patterson, head of six million member, Memphis-based, Church of God in Christ, Inc. A comprehensive list of the station’s local news stories is attached hereto as Exhibit 2 (2 – 2I). d. Local Interest Programming: WHBQ produces and televises the Memphis Symphony Orchestra’s “Home for the Holidays” Christmas concert (twice Emmy nominated). WHBQ also produces and televises specials covering the “Memphis in May International BBQ Cooking Contest” and 2 various sports specials covering local college and professional sports teams. -
NASACT News, August 2012
keeping stateNASACT fiscal officials informed news Volume 32, Number 8 August 2012 Seattle Sets the Scene for NASACT’s 97th Annual Conference By Glenda Johnson, Communications Manager ASACT President Ronald L. Jones, chief examiner of Alabama, speakers can be found on page 3. Nrecently welcomed members, corporate partners and guests At a luncheon on Monday, President Jones announced the to Seattle for NASACT’s ninety-seventh annual conference. 2012 Presidents Awards, which are given each year at the The event was held on August 11-15 at the Grand Hyatt Seattle. discretion of the president to recognize service to the association Attendees were also welcomed by the Washington State hosts and its members. This year’s recipients were: Brian Sonntag, state auditor; Marty Brown, director of the Offi ce of Financial Management; James McIntire, state treasurer; and Keenan • Auston Johnson, state auditor of Utah, who was recognized Konopaski, legislative auditor. for his longstanding dedication to NASACT, his effort and The conference began with a number of meetings and leadership to represent NASACT’s views in the standards- networking opportunities. On Saturday, August 11, some setting process over the years, and his continued dedication attendees participated in the annual golf scramble, which was to improving government effi ciency and accountability. held at the Golf Club at Newcastle. On Saturday evening, • Richard Eckstrom, comptroller general of South Carolina, attendees were treated to refreshments at the welcoming who was recognized for his service through testimony before hospitality reception after a day of golf or travel. The annual the Governmental Accounting Standards Board on the issue 5K fun run/walk was held Sunday, August 12, where over 80 of Economic Condition Reporting: Financial Projections, participants enjoyed a beautiful morning on the Elliott Bay his representation of NASACT in an international exchange waterfront.