Magazine1-4 Final.Qxd (Page 2)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Unit Indian Cinema
Popular Culture .UNIT INDIAN CINEMA Structure Objectives Introduction Introducing Indian Cinema 13.2.1 Era of Silent Films 13.2.2 Pre-Independence Talkies 13.2.3 Post Independence Cinema Indian Cinema as an Industry Indian Cinema : Fantasy or Reality Indian Cinema in Political Perspective Image of Hero Image of Woman Music And Dance in Indian Cinema Achievements of Indian Cinema Let Us Sum Up Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises A 13.0 OBJECTIVES This Unit discusses about Indian cinema. Indian cinema has been a very powerful medium for the popular expression of India's cultural identity. After reading this Unit you will be able to: familiarize yourself with the achievements of about a hundred years of Indian cinema, trace the development of Indian cinema as an industry, spell out the various ways in which social reality has been portrayed in Indian cinema, place Indian cinema in a political perspective, define the specificities of the images of men and women in Indian cinema, . outline the importance of music in cinema, and get an idea of the main achievements of Indian cinema. 13.1 INTRODUCTION .p It is not possible to fully comprehend the various facets of modern Indan culture without understanding Indian cinema. Although primarily a source of entertainment, Indian cinema has nonetheless played an important role in carving out areas of unity between various groups and communities based on caste, religion and language. Indian cinema is almost as old as world cinema. On the one hand it has gdted to the world great film makers like Satyajit Ray, , it has also, on the other hand, evolved melodramatic forms of popular films which have gone beyond the Indian frontiers to create an impact in regions of South west Asia. -
Cosmopolitan Consciousness of PC Barua
E-CineIndia: Jan-Mar 2021/ Parthajit Baruah 1 Article Parthajit Baruah The Question of Assameseness: Cosmopolitan Consciousness of P.C. Barua Still from Barua’s film Mukti An extensive discussion has been made on the made Devdas in three Languages - Bengali (1935), biographical sketch and works of Pramathesh Hindi (1936) and Assamese (1937). Likewise, World Chandra Barua, one of the leading pioneers of India Heritage Encyclopedia, cinema. But the aspect that has hardly been found a bollywoodirect.medium.com, amp.blog.shops- space in the writing and discussion at the national net.com and numerous sources carry the same narrative is why Pramathesh, being an ardent lover of incorrect information stating that Assamese Devdas Gauripur, Assam, did not make an Assamese film in made in 1937 was Barua’s last of the three language the span of two decades of his cinematic journey. versions of the film. Wikipedia misleadingly Displeasures across the state of Assam in the 1940s mentions that Bhupen Hazarika was the playback was seen, and many termed Barua as ‘anti nationalist’ singer of the film. It is pertinent to mention here that in Assam. Ibha Barua Datta, scion of the Barua when Jyoti Chitraban film studio was established in family, says that she is disheartened to read the sharp Guwahati and became functional from 1968, Dr. criticism on Pramathesh in the Assamese newspapers Hazarika proposed the Government of Assam to for not making an Assamese film. name the studio’s shooting floor after Pramathesh Ch. Barua. Bhadari by Nip Baruah was the first film, shot Some erroneously claim that Barua made three at Pramathesh Ch. -
Film Genres, the Muslim Social, and Discourses of Identity C. 1935–1945
Article BioScope Film Genres, the Muslim Social, and 6(1) 27–43 © 2015 Screen South Asia Trust Discourses of Identity c. 1935–1945 SAGE Publications sagepub.in/home.nav DOI: 10.1177/0974927615586930 http://bioscope.sagepub.com Ravi S. Vasudevan1 Abstract This article explores the phenomenon of the Muslim social film and “Islamicate” cinema of pre-Partition India to suggest a significant background to cinema’s function in the emergence of new states. In particu- lar, it seeks to provide an account of how discussions of genre and generic difference framed issues of audience and identity in the studio period of Indian film, broadly between the mid-1930s and mid-1940s. Rather than focus too narrowly on identity discourses in the cinema, I try to move among amorphous and dispersed senses of audience, more calibrated understandings related to a trade discourse of who films would appeal to, and finally, an agenda of social representation and audience address that sought to develop in step with a secular nationalist imagining of the Muslim community and its transformation. Keywords Muslim social, Mehboob, K.A. Abbas, Islamicate, oriental, Lahore This article explores the phenomenon of the Muslim social film and “Islamicate” cinema of pre-Partition India to suggest a significant background to cinema’s function in the emergence of new states. In particu- lar, it seeks to provide an account of how discussions of genre and generic difference framed issues of audience and identity in the studio period of Indian film, broadly between the mid-1930s and mid-1940s. Rather than focus too narrowly on identity discourses in the cinema, I try to move among amorphous and dispersed senses of audience, more calibrated understandings related to a trade discourse of who films would appeal to, and finally, an agenda of social representation and audience address that sought to develop in step with a secular nationalist imagining of the Muslim community and its transformation. -
Early Marathi Cinema. Prabhat Studios and Social Respectability
Early Marathi Cinema: Prabhat Studios and Social Respectability Hrishikesh Ingle Abstract The history of Marathi cinema, one of the first formations of regional cinema in India, can be traced from the studio era (1929-1953), specifically through Prabhat Studios. Prabhat Studios was situated in Kolhapur and Pune in western India. This paper analyzes two historical characteristics of Prabhat: how the studio imagined a cinema through linguistically specific regional content and forms of performance, and how this filmmaking was institutionalized as an example of artistic excellence, therefore conforming to the notion of social respectability. I argue that the filmmaking practices engendered by Prabhat aimed to project the studio, and cinema itself, as a respectable creative enterprise to Marathi society. This article accesses anecdotal biographies, archival materials, and existing Prabhat films to evaluate this tendency towards social respectability. A significant aspect of this historical account is the spatial spread, or movement, of early Marathi cinema, as it intersects other cultural forms to negotiate modernity. Keywords: Cultural studies; Indian film history; Indian studio era; Marathi cinema; Prabhat Studios; regional filmmaking; social space. rabhat Studios, along with New Theatres and Bombay Talkies, was one of the important spaces defining the Indian studio era (1920s-1953).1 Prabhat rose to prominence due to the technical excellence and variety of thematic content that it P engaged with in the late colonial period (1930s-1947).2 The history of Prabhat, apart 1 The studio era in India is understood as the period where studio-based production was the primary mode of filmmaking dominating the film industries of Bombay, Calcutta and Madras from the 1920s to 1953. -
Tagore & Cinema
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286452770 Tagore, Cinema and the Poetry of Movement Article · March 2015 CITATIONS READS 0 957 1 author: Indranil Chakrabarty LV Prasad Film & TV Academy 8 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Narrative Strategies in the Postmodern Biopic: History and Counter History View project All content following this page was uploaded by Indranil Chakrabarty on 11 December 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. This essay, published in ‘Lensight’ (Jan-Mar, 2015 issue), was presented at a JNU conference titled ‘Rethinking Tagore’ in November, 2011.The essay that follows is a modified version of that presentation. TAGORE, CINEMA AND THE POETRY OF MOVEMENT Indranil Chakravarty Introduction It must have been almost impossible to be a writer in the twentieth century in any part of the world without some kind of response to the new and emerging narrative form called cinema or ‘motion pictures’. As cinema’s birth coincided with the onset of the 20th century, its own development and growth as an art form as well as an industry went almost hand-in-hand with the vicissitudes of social, political and cultural developments in the past century. The popular and frivolous base of cinema led most ‘high brow’ writers to turn their back towards it and many of them were oblivious of the extraordinary narrative experimentations that were being explored in this new form of expression. Whether cinema could at all be considered a valid ‘art form’ was debated till the 1960s though through the 1920s and 1930s, there was a sporadic phenomenon – mainly in Europe and USA - of painters, theatre directors and writers collaborating on film projects. -
Anil Biswas – Filmography Source: Hamraz’S Hindi Film Geet Kosh (Digitization: Ketan Dholakia, Vinayak Gore, and Balaji Murthy)
Anil Biswas – Filmography Source: Hamraz’s Hindi Film Geet Kosh (Digitization: Ketan Dholakia, Vinayak Gore, and Balaji Murthy) Contents Anil Biswas – Filmography ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1) Dharam Ki Devi ..................................................................................................................... 3 2) Fida-e-Vatan (alias Tasveer-e-vafa) ...................................................................................... 3 3) Piya Ki Jogan (alias Purchased Bride) ................................................................................... 3 4) Pratima (alias Prem Murti) ..................................................................................................... 4 5) Prem Bandhan (alias Victims of Love) .................................................................................. 4 6) Sangdil Samaj ......................................................................................................................... 4 7) Sher Ka Panja ......................................................................................................................... 5 8) Shokh Dilruba ......................................................................................................................... 5 9) Bulldog ................................................................................................................................... 5 10) Dukhiari (alias A Tale of Selfless Love) -
How Rural Is Hindi Cinema? 14 Shoma A
MORPARIA’S PAGE E-mail: [email protected] Contents AUGUST 2016 VOL.20/1 ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ THEME: Morparia’s page 2 Rural India The ‘country’ calls… 5 Nivedita Louis An irreparable loss 6 Managing Editor Bharat Dogra Mrs. Sucharita R. Hegde The urban farmers 8 Hiren Kumar Bose Editor A project called Mandya 2020 11 Anuradha Dhareshwar E. Vijayalakshmi Rajan How rural is Hindi cinema? 14 Shoma A. Chatterji Assistant Editor Decentralise now! 16 E.Vijayalakshmi Rajan 6 Prof. G. Palanithurai Not charged! 19 Design Samarth Bansal H. V. Shiv Shankar Subsidies that hurt 21 Bharat Dogra Marketing Know India Better Mahesh Kanojia Haridwar: 23 The holy time warp Gustasp & Jeroo Irani OIOP Clubs Co-ordinator Face to Face 35 Vaibhav Palkar Jaya Jaitly : Anuradha Dhareshwar Features Subscription In-Charge Renewable, but is it sustainable? 39 Nagesh Bangera G. Venkatesh Our bulwark 41 23 Lt. Gen. Vijay Oberoi Advisory Board Through the bars of hope 44 Sucharita Hegde Sujit Bhar Justice S. Radhakrishnan Smile...it enhances your face value! 46 Venkat R. Chary A. Radhakrishnan An unseemly battle 48 Prof. Avinash Kolhe Printed & Published by The lips that bragged, the feet that danced 50 Mrs. Sucharita R. Hegde for A. Radhakrishnan One India One People Foundation, Column 52 Mahalaxmi Chambers, 4th floor, Nature watch : Bittu Sahgal 22, Bhulabhai Desai Road, Infocus : C.V. Aravind Mumbai - 400 026 Jaya Jaitly Young India 54 Tel: 022-2353 4400 35 Great Indians 56 Fax: 022-2351 7544 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Printed at: Graphtone (India) Pvt. Ltd. A1 /319, Shah & Nahar Industrial Estate. -
Dadasaheb Phalke Awards
Dadasaheb Phalke Awards The Dadasaheb Phalke Awards is the highest award in cinema. It is annually presented at the National Film Awards ceremony by the Directorate of Film Festivals. The award is named after Dhundiraj Govind Phalke, popularly known as Dadasaheb Phalke. Dadasaheb Phalke is regarded as the ‘father of Indian cinema’. In the 2021 edition of the Dadasaheb Phalke Awards Deepika Padukone received the best actress award for her film Chhapaak while Akshay Kumar got the awards for fis performance in the film Laxmi. This article will give details about Dadasaheb Phalke Awards within the context of the IAS Exam Brief facts about Dadasaheb Phalke Ddasheb Phalke was a producer-director-screenwriter who made India’s first feature-length film, Raja Harishchandra in 1913. He made 95 feature-length films and 27 short films in his career, spanning 19 years, until 1937, including his most noted works: Mohini Bhasmasur (1913), Satyavan Savitri (1914), Lanka Dahan (1917), Shri Krishna Janma (1918) and Kaliya Mardan (1919). His contributions to India cinema was legendary and thus was the reason why the Indian government instituted an award in his honour. Recipients of the Dadasaheb Phalke Awards The following table gives the list of winners of the Dadasaheb Phalke Awards through the years Dadasaheb Phalke Awards Recipients (1969-1979) Year Recipient Film Industry 1969 Devika Rani Hindi 1970 Birendranath Sircar Bengali 1971 Prithviraj Kapoor Hindi 1972 Pankaj Mullick ● Hindi ● Bengali 1973 Ruby Myers (Sulochana) Hindi 1974 Bommireddy Narasimha Reddy Telugu 1975 Dhirendra Nath Ganguly Bengali 1976 Kanan Devi Bengali 1977 Nitin Bose Bengali Hindi 1978 Raichand Boral ● Hindi ● Bengali 1979 Sohrab Modi Hindi The following table gives the list of winners from 1980-1989 Dadasaheb Phalke Awards Recipients (1980-1989) Year Recipient Film Industry 1980 Paidi Jairaj ● Hindi ● Telugu 1981 Naushad Hindi 1982 L. -
Indian Cinema and the Bahujan Spectatorship
ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Indian Cinema and the Bahujan Spectatorship JYOTI NISHA Jyoti Nisha ([email protected]) is a writer, director, and producer. She directed well- known documentary film "B R Ambedkar—Now and Then." Vol. 55, Issue No. 20, 16 May, 2020 Bahujan spectatorship relates to an oppositional gaze and a political strategy of Bahujans to reject the Brahminical representation of caste and marginalised communities in Indian cinema. It is also an inverted methodology to document a different sociopolitical Bahujan experience of consuming popular cinema. “Indians today are governed by two different ideologies. Their political ideal set in the preamble of the Constitution affirms a life of liberty, equality and fraternity. Their social ideal embodied in their religion denies them.” (Narake et al 2003) This dual imagination of Indian nation, as B R Ambedkar forewarned, finds its manifestation even on the silver screen. India’s popular imagination of its colonial past has been that of a “haloed” history of Indian nationalism. Ambedkar has not been part of this popular imagination, and neither do the politics, history, and social movements of the marginalised. The assertion of the marginalised has hardly made it to the pre- and post-independence Indian cinema. Largely, the image of Indian nationalism in the popular imagination has been ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 that of M K Gandhi, and Ambedkar and his social justice movements against Brahmanism have been absent from the public conscience. This gaze of “othering,” silencing, and appropriating the existence of history, knowledge, and symbols of the marginalised communities have been tools employed by the upper-caste film-makers deliberately. -
Cinema at the End of Empire: a Politics of Transition
cinema at the end of empire CINEMA AT duke university press * Durham and London * 2006 priya jaikumar THE END OF EMPIRE A Politics of Transition in Britain and India © 2006 Duke University Press * All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Designed by Amy Ruth Buchanan Typeset in Quadraat by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data and permissions information appear on the last printed page of this book. For my parents malati and jaikumar * * As we look back at the cultural archive, we begin to reread it not univocally but contrapuntally, with a simultaneous awareness both of the metropolitan history that is narrated and of those other histories against which (and together with which) the dominating discourse acts. —Edward Said, Culture and Imperialism CONTENTS List of Illustrations xi Acknowledgments xiii Introduction 1 1. Film Policy and Film Aesthetics as Cultural Archives 13 part one * imperial governmentality 2. Acts of Transition: The British Cinematograph Films Acts of 1927 and 1938 41 3. Empire and Embarrassment: Colonial Forms of Knowledge about Cinema 65 part two * imperial redemption 4. Realism and Empire 107 5. Romance and Empire 135 6. Modernism and Empire 165 part three * colonial autonomy 7. Historical Romances and Modernist Myths in Indian Cinema 195 Notes 239 Bibliography 289 Index of Films 309 General Index 313 ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Reproduction of ‘‘Following the E.M.B.’s Lead,’’ The Bioscope Service Supplement (11 August 1927) 24 2. ‘‘Of cource [sic] it is unjust, but what can we do before the authority.’’ Intertitles from Ghulami nu Patan (Agarwal, 1931) 32 3. -
Traditional Content and Narrative Structure in the Hindi Commercial Cinema Author(S): Gregory D
Nanzan University Traditional Content and Narrative Structure in the Hindi Commercial Cinema Author(s): Gregory D. Booth Source: Asian Folklore Studies, Vol. 54, No. 2 (1995), pp. 169-190 Published by: Nanzan University Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1178940 . Accessed: 11/09/2011 07:00 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Nanzan University is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Asian Folklore Studies. http://www.jstor.org GREGORYD. BOOTH University of Auckland TraditionalContent and NarrativeStruc- ture in the Hindi CommercialCinema Abstract The commercial Hindi cinema has been subjected to domestic and foreign criticism for its exceptionally formulaic and stereotypical feature productions. These productions, however, have their sources in the oral and written epics and the popular dramatic genres of traditional Indian culture. Content borrowed from the Ramayana, the Mahabharata, and other pan-Indian tales frequently enlarges and reinterprets the char- acters and plots of the commercial cinema. The disconcerting emotional melange pre- sented by Hindi films is consistent with aesthetic theories of emotional content found in Indian epic narrative. The stereotyping of characters and of interpersonal relationships reflects the influence of traditional Indian epic structure, while the growing frequency of self-reflexive humor in the medium suggests yet another connection between contempo- rary Hindi cinema and the historically powerful traditions of Indian drama and narra- tive. -
History of Indian Cinema.Pdf
CHAPTER – 2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF INDIAN CINEMA Indian films are unquestionably the most –seen movies in the world. Not just talking about the billion- strong audiences in India itself, where 12 million people are said to go to the cinema every day, but of large audiences well beyond the Indian subcontinent and the Diaspora, in such unlikely places as Russia, China, the Middle East, the Far East Egypt, Turkey and Africa. People from very different cultural and social worlds have a great love for Indian popular cinema, and many have been Hindi Films fans for over fifty years. Indian cinema is world – famous for the staggering amount of films it produces: the number is constantly on the increase, and recent sources estimate that a total output of some 800 films a year are made in different cities including Madrass , Bangalore , Calcutta and Hyderabad . Of this astonishing number, those films made in Bombay, in a seamless blend of Hindi and Urdu, have the widest distribution within India and Internationally. The two sister languages are spoken in six northern states and understood by over 500 million people on the Indian sub – continent alone – reason enough for Hindi and Urdu to be chosen above the fourteen official Indian languages to become the languages of Indian Popular cinema when sound came to the Indian Silver screen in 1931 . Silent Era – The cinematographe (from where we have the name cinema) invented by the Lumiere brothers functioned better the Kinetoscope of Edison and Dickson. The Lumiere brothers who invented the cinematographe started projection of short (very short, one to two minutes long) films for the Parsian public on November 28, 1895.