DOCSLIB.ORG

Rural Official Community Plan Bylaw No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rural Official Community Plan Bylaw No Northern Rockies Regional Municipality Rural Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 136, 2017 A Bylaw to establish an Official Community Plan for the rural area of the Northern Rockies Regional Municipality. WHEREAS the Local Government Act authorizes the Municipality to adopt Official Community Plans; and WHEREAS this Bylaw has been considered in conjunction with the Municipality’s financial plans, waste management plan, and economic development strategy and has been referred to the Provincial Agricultural Land Commission, in accordance with the Local Government Act; and WHEREAS the Municipality has provided opportunities they determine appropriate for consultation with persons, organizations and authorities they consider will be affected, and has consulted with the School Board for School District No. 81; and AND WHEREAS all persons who might be affected by this Bylaw have been afforded the opportunity to be heard on the matters covered therein before the Regional Council of the Northern Rockies Regional Municipality in accordance with the provisions of the Community Charter and Local Government Act; NOW THEREFORE the Regional Council for the Northern Rockies Regional Municipality, in open meeting assembled, hereby enacts as follows: 1. Citation This Bylaw may be cited as the “Northern Rockies Regional Municipality Rural Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 136, 2017.” 2. Official Community Plan Adoption The following schedules attached hereto are hereby made part of this Bylaw: Schedule A: Rural Official Community Plan Bylaw Text Schedule B: Rural Official Community Plan Map 3. Severability If any division, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this bylaw is for any reason held to be invalid by the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the bylaw. READ a first time this 24th day of April, 2017. READ a second time this 24th day of April, 2017. NOTICE of a Public Hearing published on April 26th, 2017 and May 3rd, 2017. Public Hearing held on this 8th day of May, 2017. READ a third time this 8th day of May, 2017 CERTIFIED a true & correct copy of “Northern Rockies Regional Municipality Rural Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 136, 2017” as read a third time by the Regional Council of the Northern Rockies Regional Municipality. Corporate Manager ADOPTED this 8th day of May, 2017. Bill Streeper, Mayor Corporate Manager NRRM Rural Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 136, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Northern Rockies Regional Municipality Rural Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 136, 2017 Schedule A: Rural Official Community Plan Bylaw Text TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1 - Introduction ............................................................... 1 1. Characteristics of the Plan Area ............................................................................................................ 1 2. Relationship with the NRRM Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 64, 2011 and Other Plans .............. 2 3. Legislative Authority ............................................................................................................................. 2 4. Review of Official Community Plan ....................................................................................................... 2 5. Planning Process ................................................................................................................................... 3 6. Content of OCP ..................................................................................................................................... 3 7. Definitions ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Part 2 - Plan Goals .................................................................. 6 Part 3 - Objectives and Policies ............................................... 7 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 7 2. Objectives and Policies That Apply to Plan Area................................................................................... 7 2.1 Broad Objectives and Policies ......................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Economic Development ........................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1.1 Objectives.......................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1.2 Policies .............................................................................................................................. 7 2.1.2 Protection of the Environment ................................................................................................ 8 2.1.2.1 Objectives.......................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.2.2 Policies .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.1.3 Natural Hazards ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.1.3.1 Objectives.......................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.3.2 Policies ............................................................................................................................ 10 2.1.4 Heritage Resources ................................................................................................................ 10 2.1.4.1 Objectives........................................................................................................................ 10 2.1.4.2 Policies ............................................................................................................................ 11 2.1.5 Highways and Roads .............................................................................................................. 11 2.1.5.1 Objectives........................................................................................................................ 11 2.1.5.2 Policies ............................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.6 Provision of Municipal Services ............................................................................................. 12 2.1.6.1 Objectives........................................................................................................................ 12 NORTHERN ROCKIES RURAL OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN – Schedule A Page i 2.1.6.2 Policies ............................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.7 Development of Aggregate Resources .................................................................................. 13 2.1.7.1 Objectives........................................................................................................................ 13 2.1.7.2 Policies ............................................................................................................................ 13 2.1.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................................................................................... 13 2.1.8.1 Objective ......................................................................................................................... 13 2.1.8.2 Policies ............................................................................................................................ 14 2.2 Objectives and Policies for Specific Land Use Designations ......................................................... 14 2.2.1 Rural Resource (R) .................................................................................................................. 14 2.2.1.1 Objectives........................................................................................................................ 14 2.2.1.2 Policies ............................................................................................................................ 15 2.2.2 Resource Industry (RI) ............................................................................................................ 16 2.2.2.1 Objectives........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2.2.2 Policies ............................................................................................................................ 16 2.2.3 Parks and Protected Areas (P) ............................................................................................... 17 2.2.3.1 Objectives........................................................................................................................ 17 2.2.3.2 Policies ............................................................................................................................ 18 2.2.4 Agriculture (A) ........................................................................................................................ 18 2.2.4.1 Objectives........................................................................................................................ 18 2.2.4.2 Policies ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3Nation-BC Collaborative Stewardship Forum: Phase 2 Final Report On
    3Nation-BC Collaborative Stewardship Forum: Phase 2 Final Report on Collaborative Governance Review and Research Jodi Gustafson & Kimberly Heinemeyer Round River Conservation Studies 9/28/20 Final Report September 2020, Prepared for The 3 Nations - British Columbia Collaborative Stewardship Forum 3Nation-BC CSF Co-Governance Phase 2 Final Report Round River Conservation Studies CONTENTS Report Summary .................................................................................................................................... iv Recommendations .............................................................................................................................. v Constructive Relationships: ............................................................................................................ v Identifying Shared Values: .............................................................................................................. v Information used in decision-making processes............................................................................ vi A regional framework and shared decision-making ...................................................................... vi Define and implement short term “pilot” projects ....................................................................... vi Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Rules Against Kaska Dena Council As Rights and Title Holder
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 7, 2019 Supreme Court Rules Against Kaska Dena Council as Rights and Title Holder WATSON LAKE – The Supreme Court of Yukon filed a decision earlier this week ruling against all claims brought forth by the Kaska Dena Council (KDC) in their motion seeking a formal declaration as a holder of Kaska Aboriginal rights and title in its dealings with the Government of Yukon. Liard First Nation was named in the case as a Defendant to oppose the KDC application to the court, on the grounds that KDC had no authority as it is not a rights-bearing group or authorized to bring this action. The ruling confirmed that Kaska Dena Council is not a rights-bearing group, nor an authorized representative of a rights-bearing group. The Court ruled that KDC cannot assert aboriginal rights or title on behalf of some members of the Kaska Nation. The court has made clear findings of fact that the Kaska Nation rights-holders are Liard First Nation, Ross River Dena Council, Dease River First Nation, and Kwadacha Nation. When Crown decisions are being made that could impact Kaska aboriginal rights and title - those are the governments whose concerns must be addressed. This decision sends a clear message that other governments and proponents must work with Liard First Nation to ensure that Kaska aboriginal rights remain meaningful when development and business opportunities are proposed in Kaska traditional territory. The decision outlines six separate issues around Kaska Dena Council’s assertions that were overturned in their entirety by the ruling. Quote: “This decision makes clear who governments and industry must consult and engage with on matters relevant to Kaska aboriginal rights and title,” said Liard First Nation Chief George Morgan.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWS RELEASE for Immediate Release Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation 2012ARR0009-000682 Kaska Dena Council May 17, 2012
    NEWS RELEASE For Immediate Release Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation 2012ARR0009-000682 Kaska Dena Council May 17, 2012 Agreement boosts economic certainty in the Northwest VICTORIA – A new strategic engagement agreement (SEA) with the Kaska Dena First Nations in northwestern B.C. provides greater certainty about how resource development can proceed in more than 10 per cent of the province. B.C. and the Kaska Dena Council developed the SEA together. The agreement sets out government-to-government decision-making structures and processes that establish a co- operative approach to reviewing proposed development activities with the Kaska Dena in their traditional territory. These will guide how government and Kaska engage with northern communities, and environmental and industry stakeholders. This agreement sets out agreed-to levels of engagement regarding resource permits and helps B.C. and the Kaska Dena Council work efficiently together, including achieving timely turn- around objectives for reviewing resource permits. Where the end result is a positive decision, this will allow industry to get shovels in the ground faster, creating more jobs and other economic benefits for both the Kaska Dena and the Province more quickly in the North, and making sure that Kaska Dena First Nations are involved in shared decision-making. The Kaska Dena Strategic Engagement Agreement complements the Dease-Liard Sustainable Resource Management Plan (SRMP) signed in January, which confirms that the majority of the SRMP area is available for sustainable development. The direction provided in the management plan will enable more meaningful discussions between the Province and Kaska on resource development and is facilitated by the SEA.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Knowledge Integration Final November 2007
    “Eye on the Wheel” A Strategic Plan for Linking Traditional Knowledge In Resource Planning and Management for the Muskwa Kechika Management Area prepared for The Knowledge & Understanding Committee of the Muskwa Kechika Advisory Board March 31, 2007 Prepared by Reg. C. Whiten, P.Ag MCIP InterraPlan Inc., Moberly Lake with Melanie Karjala, Dan Lousier “RE-EDITED DRAFT Nov 15, 2007” Preface In the preface of his book “Little Bit Know Something”, Robin Ridington relates the stories of Dunne-Za Elders to questions from an anthropologist’s perspective. He draws a central lesson from his in-depth experience with these people: ”How a person knows something is as important as what he or she knows….their knowledge of animals and of the land reflects an intelligence that goes back to the earliest human traditions…the Dunne-Za say that a person who speaks from the authority of his or her own experience.. “little bit know something”. Knowledge, the elders say, empowers a person to live in this world with intelligence and understanding. They recognize that knowledge is a distinctively human attribute. They recognize knowledge as a form of power. Since the time of their culture hero, Saya, Dunne-za men and women have sent their children into the bush to gain power from the animals and natural forces of their country. From these experiences, children have grown into adults who “little bit know something”. R. Ridington p.xiv-xv, ‘Little Bit Know Something’ Indeed, one’s personal experience in any given Only when you come to the place place in combination with Where you remember what is happening to you storied human Will the circle of time interactions can yield Turn around you many important, albeit Only when the tracks before you are subtle pieces of your own knowledge, special Will you turn with the circle insights, and even When your feet enter the tracks wisdom depending upon Of every other being the learner’s purpose and You will see them as your own depth of their encounter.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Appendix A13 Part 1 Community Summary: Kwadacha
    SITE C CLEAN ENERGY PROJECT VOLUME 5 APPENDIX A13 PART 1 COMMUNITY SUMMARY: KWADACHA FIRST NATION FINAL REPORT Prepared for: BC Hydro Power and Authority 333 Dunsmuir Street Vancouver, B.C. V6B 5R3 Prepared by: Fasken Martineau 2900-550 Burrard Street Vancouver, B.C. V6C 0A3 January 2013 Site C Clean Energy Project Volume 5 Appendix A13 Part1 Community Summary: Kwadacha First Nation Kwadacha First Nation Kwadacha First Nation (Kwadacha) has three reserves situated in northeastern B.C. in the Rocky Mountain Trench, a valley formed by the eastern and central ranges of the Rocky Mountains. The largest reserve is Fort Ware No. 1 (388 ha); the others are small fishing reserves on nearby lakes (Sucker Lake No. 2, Weissener Lake No. 3).1 The most current publicly available population data indicates that in May 2008, Kwadacha had 445 band members.2 The main community is at Fort Ware, which is accessible by logging road from Mackenzie or by air from Prince George. Facilities at Fort Ware include a recreation centre, a school with elementary and high school grades, and a daycare centre.3 Kwadacha has a Chief, Deputy Chief and three Councillors.4 Kwadacha members are employed seasonally in resource industries, as well as in administration, education, and other service-oriented work. Some members continue to maintain traplines in their traditional territory.5 Kwadacha is a member of the Kaska Dene Council, an organization formed in 1981 to advance the interests of Kaska communities in treaty negotiations. Other members include Dease River First Nation (Good Hope Lake, B.C.); Daylu Dena Council (Lower Post, B.C.); Liard First Nation (Watson Lake, Yukon), and Ross River Dena Council (Ross River, Yukon).
    [Show full text]
  • Ross River Dena Council V. Canada Date: 20171023 (Attorney General), 2017 YKSC 59 S.C
    SUPREME COURT OF YUKON Citation: Ross River Dena Council v. Canada Date: 20171023 (Attorney General), 2017 YKSC 59 S.C. No. 06-A0092 Registry: Whitehorse BETWEEN: ROSS RIVER DENA COUNCIL PLAINTIFF AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA DEFENDANT Before Mr. Justice L.F. Gower Appearances: Stephen Walsh and Counsel for the Plaintiff Claire Anderson Suzanne M. Duncan and Counsel for the Defendant Geneviève Chabot REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Ross River Dena Council v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 YKSC 59 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................. 2 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 5 2. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND .......................................................................... 6 3. ISSUES .............................................................................................................. 15 4.0 ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................... 19 4.1 Issue #1: Has Canada, since 1973, failed to take reasonable, or any, steps to protect the claimed Aboriginal title of RRDC? If so, is such conduct inconsistent with the honour of the Crown? ............................... 19 4.2 Issue #2: Has Canada, since 1973, ignored the fact that until the relevant provision in the 1870 Order is complied with, he lands in question are “lands reserved for the Indians” within the meaning of s. 91(24) of the Constitution
    [Show full text]
  • Yukon Supreme Court Kaska Decision (2019)
    SUPREME COURT OF YUKON Citation: Kaska Dena Council v. Yukon (Government of), Date: 20190305 2019 YKSC 13 S.C. No. 16-A0161 Registry: Whitehorse BETWEEN KASKA DENA COUNCIL Plaintiff/ Defendant by Counterclaim AND GOVERNMENT OF YUKON Defendant/ Intervenor by Counterclaim AND CHIEF GEORGE MORGAN on his own behalf and on behalf of all the members of the Liard First Nation, and LIARD FIRST NATION Defendants/ Plaintiffs by Counterclaim AND ACHO DENE KOE FIRST NATION Intervenor Before Chief Justice R.S. Veale Appearances: Claire E. Anderson Counsel for Kaska Dena Council Elaine Cairns and Marlaine Anderson-Lindsay Counsel for the Government of Yukon Caily DiPuma and Gavin Gardiner Counsel for Liard First Nation Hana Boye Counsel for Acho Dene Koe First Nation REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Kaska Dena Council v. Yukon (Government of Yukon), 2019 YKSC 13 Page 2 INTRODUCTION [1] Kaska Dena Council (“KDC”) applies for a declaration and order that the Government of Yukon (“Yukon”) has a duty to consult and accommodate KDC prior to issuing sport hunting licences and tags under the Wildlife Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 229, in the southern part of Kaska territory in Yukon. KDC also applies for a declaration that Yukon has breached its duty to consult. At the outset, it is important to understand that KDC seeks a declaration that the duty to consult and accommodate arises prior to issuing sport hunting licences and tags on an annual basis under the Wildlife Act and Regulations. Yukon states that it is consulting and is ready to continue. KDC submits that Yukon refuses to discuss the preliminary strength of claim issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Yukon Supreme Court Decision – KDC V
    Background Yukon Supreme Court Decision – KDC v. Yukon and Liard First Nation The Kaska Dena Council (“KDC”) commenceD a court action claiming that the Government of Yukon (“Yukon”) oweD KDC a Duty to consult anD accommoDate before issuing sport hunting licenses anD tags in the southeastern Yukon. The LiarD First Nation (“LFN”) was adDeD as a DefenDant to the court action in September 2017. LFN DiD not initiate or conDone the KDC case anD felt obligateD to join the litigation in orDer to protect the rights, title anD interests of the Kaska in the southeast Yukon. LFN’s concern was not whether the Duty to consult was oweD but rather, whom it was oweD to. The case was hearD over five Days between July 11 – 17, 2018 in Whitehorse. Yukon Supreme Court Chief Justice Ron Veale releaseD his decision on March 5, 2019. LFN argueD, among other things, that KDC was stepping outsiDe of its authority as a lanD claim negotiation organization in claiming a Duty to be consulteD in its own name on S.35 rights. Justice Veale ruleD strongly against KDC. His ultimate finDing is repeateD throughout the juDgment but perhaps most succinctly at paragraph 146 where he states: “[KDC’s] claim is based upon the acknowledged aboriginal title of the Kaska represented by the KDC which is disputed by both Yukon and LFN. I have concluded that KDC is not an aboriginal rights-bearing group that it is not authorized to act on behalf of its individual Kaska members of the Kaska First Nations who do hold the collective aboriginal rights of the Kaska Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Gladue Report
    RESEARCH & RESOURCE IDENTIFICATION PROJECT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for the Yukon Gladue Research and Resource Identification Project was made possible by the Department of Justice Canada, Aboriginal Justice Strategy. The Yukon Gladue Steering Committee was comprised of representatives of: The Council of Yukon First Nations Justice Programs, The Carcross/Tagish First Nation Community Justice Office, The Kwanlin Dün First Nation Justice Department, The Public Prosecution Service of Canada Yukon Region, Yukon Legal Services Society and the Government of Yukon Department of Justice. Numerous representatives from various organizations throughout the Yukon contributed to the project in the form of providing information or interpreting information including: Chütsi Vision Research and Consulting, Stevens Justice Consulting, Gerry Ewert from the Yukon First Nations Statistics Agency, at least one representative from each of the 14 Yukon First Nations and other community support representatives. A number of Yukon Territorial Judges provided insight or commentary on the Gladue efforts in the Yukon to date including: Chief Judge Ruddy, Judge Cozens, Judge Chisholm and Deputy Judge Luther. Council of Yu kon First Nations For more information contact: CYFN Justice Programs, suite 201, 2131-2nd Avenue, Whitehorse, YT Y1A 4P1 P (867) 667-3783 F (867) 667-8097 Cover Photo © YG 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 4-9 Introduction 1 2 Gladue Scans Pages 10-20 Pages 24-26 Data Tables 3 4 Protocols Pages 27-30 Pages 31-47 Aftercare Directory 5 6 Conclusion & Next Steps Pages 48-49 3 INTRODUCTION One evening an old Cherokee Indian told his grandson about a battle that goes on inside people. He said, ‘My son, the battle is between two ‘wolves’ inside us all.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaska Dena Council V. Yukon (Attorney General) Date: 20180118 2018 YKSC 3 S.C
    SUPREME COURT OF YUKON Citation: Kaska Dena Council v. Yukon (Attorney General) Date: 20180118 2018 YKSC 3 S.C. No. 16-A0161 Registry: Whitehorse BETWEEN KASKA DENA COUNCIL PLAINTIFF AND GOVERNMENT OF YUKON CHIEF GEORGE MORGAN on his own behalf And on behalf of all the members of the Liard First Nation, And the LIARD FIRST NATION DEFENDANTS AND ACHO DENE KOE FIRST NATION Before Mr. Justice R.S. Veale Appearances: Claire Anderson Counsel for Kaska Dena Council Marlaine Anderson-Lindsay and Counsel for Government of Yukon Elaine Cairns Gavin Gardiner Counsel for Chief George Morgan and Liard First Nation REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (Application for Particulars) INTRODUCTION [1] VEALE J. (Oral): The plaintiff, Kaska Dena Council (“KDC”) has filed a claim against the Government of Yukon seeking a declaration that the Government of Yukon has a duty to consult KDC prior to issuing hunting licences and tags, in the southern part of the Kaska Territory in the Yukon, and that it has failed to do so and should be Kaska Dena Council v. Yukon (Attorney General), 2018 YKSC 3____ Page 2 ordered to consult. The KDC is a British Columbia society that claims to be part of the Kaska Nation which includes Ross River Dena Council and Liard First Nation’ traditional territory in the Yukon. It appears that there are overlapping First Nation claims at issue. [2] KDC asserts what is known as a transboundary claim in the southern Yukon as its members are in northern British Columbia and not the Yukon. KDC and the Government of Yukon have signed a Memorandum of Agreement in January 1997 purporting to commence negotiations towards a Transboundary Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Annual Report
    RECOGNITION HONOURS OUR PAST CREATES OUR FUTURE...
    [Show full text]
  • Kaska Nation
    KASKA DENA COUNCIL OPENING INTERVENTION ITEM 5, Document 6/3 March 16, 2004 1. Thank you Mr. Chairman, I am speaking on behalf of the Kaska Dena Council. The Kaska traditional territory encompasses some 93,000 square miles stretching from north -western Br itish Columbia through the southeast Yukon and into the adjacent parts of the Northwest Territories, Canada. The Kaska Nation is represented by three regional groups, one in British Columbia, the Kaska Dena Council, and two in the Yukon, The Ross River De na Council and Liard First Nation. I am speaking on behalf of the Kaska Dena Council. 2. As this is my first intervention, I would like to congratulate you on your re -election as Chair of this Committee. As you have noted and as many members that have prece ded my intervention have stated, we are at a key turning point in this Committee’s work. I am confident that you will continue to artfully and skillfully guide us in these challenging discussions. 3. I am also pleased to expressly thank the Secretariat for i ts preparation of the document on this important subject matter. It is clear from my perspective that the Secretariat is very mindful of the diversity and vastness of rights that full under the broadly termed phrase Indigenous knowledge and, with the guid ance of this Committee, are pragmatically approaching our directions forward. 4. Mr. Chairman, before I begin with my complementary intervention. I would like to state that the I speak in full support with the substantive intervention of my learned colleague from the Saami Council, particularly with respect to his emphasis on the role of customary law in the protection of Indigenous knowledge.
    [Show full text]