Literary and Philosophical Heritage of Symbolism (On Problem of Searching for Truth)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
SHS Web of Conferences 50, 01086 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001086 CILDIAH-2018 Literary and Philosophical Heritage of Symbolism (on Problem of Searching for Truth) Evgeny Korobeinikov*, Denis Khabibulin, Evgeny Tsapov, and Olesya Golubeva Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, 455000, Lenin av., 38, Magnitogorsk Russia Abstract. This paper examines the cultural heritage of the end of the 19th - the beginning of the 20th century, which period is known for the crisis that struck all the spheres of life of the time – social and economic, political, philosophical, aesthetic. It is for this reason that the intellectuals of the time reflected on the crisis in their artistic, philosophical and spiritual search. In particular, this can be traced in the works of Russian and foreign modernists. In that period, the problem of creative cognition as a special ideology and a way to create life becomes of particular importance. The relevance of this work is defined by striving to outline certain approaches to solving this problem. The aim of this research is to identify the particularities of the subject-object relationship and how it forms in a literary work while enabling the author to build an adequate symbolist picture of the world, to transform and create it. The aspect examined by the authors of this article will help analyse the system of symbolism, just like any other theory, from the philosophical standpoint. One can use the results of this research when developing new programmes for basic and special courses in the history of 20th-century Russian literature and culture to be taught at university or at school. The problem of identifying the specific features of broad, comprehensive, enabling to set and achieve a creative cognition, which has undergone a long period of grand purpose [7, 8, 9]. And if philosophy is the study of evolution – from the theory of imitation of nature in the all things and all their meanings, and the need to build a ancient world to the theory of reflection of reality in the comprehensive picture of the world, or the need to 20th century, – is of extreme relevance even today [1, 2, search for the truth, is a principal spiritual need of a 3, 4, 5]. And it is in symbolism that this problem is given human being, who for the sake of satisfying this need is a special focus and an original interpretation. Many often willing to sacrifice the others. This would be aspects of this problem are yet to reveal themselves in exactly the scale of tasks that symbolist writers set to full, especially in the practical implementation of such a themselves (which they often declare in their works), complex phenomenon as senior symbolism. which fundamentally differentiates them from their The central gnoseological category in symbolism is predecessors, the overwhelming majority of whom Symbol, which encompasses a set of certain concepts. would deal with exclusively aesthetic tasks [10, 11, 12]. First of all, with the help of these concepts one who In fact, they are trying to adequately respond to the perceives the reality can recreate or create it in multiple challenge of the time: theoretical reasoning is no longer worlds of the author’s imagination. Secondly, they can satisfying as it is not relevant to practical life and diverts be compared to the space-time system of a novel as they one from the reality into the sphere of abstract can simulate the space-time continuum depending on the philosophizing failing to achieve the main purpose, i.e. time coordinates or the cycle of seasons, days, etc. (for the ability to influence the reader. That is why there is example, in works by Valery Bryusov and Fedor feedback: it is through (first aspect) the philosophical Sologub). Thirdly, through realizing their perception of the reality, through (second aspect) the communication function, they enable and sometimes proper artistic expression of acquired views, and (third force the reader to plunge in the author’s world thus aspect) the practical method of evocation that one can making the reader a part of the actual creative process produce a profound effect on the world. [6]. Symbolists believe that neither realists (naturalists) We would like to point out the fact that even in its nor disciples of the pure art concept are capable to beginnings, symbolism drew attention and was perceive the entire spectrum of capabilities that a work considered by both its critics and supporters as a of art possesses and thus cannot exploit them. The tasks phenomenon that goes beyond the purely aesthetic they set to themselves are not complex enough (realists framework. Indeed, the ideological crisis, the loss of the focus on the object while those who support the idea of matter, the apprehension and the anticipation of future art for art’s sake focus on the subject). Both of the above disasters and global apocalypse, which were perturbing underestimate the philosophical value of art [13, 14]. to many, – the response to all this had to be something Only through the integration of the subject-object * Corresponding author: [email protected] © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). SHS Web of Conferences 50, 01086 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001086 CILDIAH-2018 relationship in a literary work one can build an adequate comprehending the incomprehensible Russian and picture of the world and transform or create it; that is Western European symbolists (in particular, M. why, one needs to know the truth in all of its subject- Maeterlinck) went their separate ways. object completeness. This is what symbolist art is M. Maeterlinck’s characters, balancing in between capable of, which is opposed to its predecessors and existence and non-existence, cherish a vague hope that which sets tasks of extreme importance. And this makes the Truth can be materialized. In his works Non- symbolism go beyond the aesthetic framework and gives existence crashes into the world of Being, which is it ontological, gnoseological and ethical meanings [15]. realized through the image of death or the tragedy of Using Andrey Belyi’s words, “… Symbolism should everyday life. In its turn, Existence crashes into the follow a broader ideology: the symbolist principles realm of the non-creating and non-being while should give us a solid philosophical system. Through emphasizing, pre-making, creating it in the process of symbolism one can contemplate the world.” [16] cognition. By placing his characters in the borderline If one accepts the above-mentioned assumption, one state, Maeterlinck admits there is nothing that would be can analyse the system of symbolism, just like any other non-pure, beyond the limits. He believes that the doctrine, from the philosophical standpoint. In this case, objectivation of the Truth is pre-determined by the actual the gnoseological aspect – in other words, identifying human progress. It could be for this reason that the ways and means to search for the truth – comes to the Russian symbolist Nikolay Minsky, founder of meonism, foreground in works by both Russian and Western gave him the nickname “Maurice the Happy Man”. European symbolists. Compared with their Belgian counterpart, Russian Having analysed the writings of various authors, we symbolists were more consistent and radical. They pay a can make the following assumption: For symbolists the great deal of attention to the creation: “Abstraction subject of cognition is the overall substance of things. delights me // Through it I create the world…” (Zinaida Symbolists believe that cognition is a natural immanent Gippius proclaims), “I am the God of the mysterious part of human existence. As all his life a person strives world…” (Fedor Sologub says to the reader), “You are for freedom, for all the restrictions to be removed your own God, you are your own neighbour.// So be (especially in gnoseology), he naturally acquires the your own Creator…” (Dmitry Merezhkovsky appeals). need for metaphysical knowledge [17, 18]. This premise superimposed on the renaissance thesis, We believe it would be interesting to identify and which is also popular in German romanticism, i.e. “you understand the following aspects in the philosophical created = you perceived”, produces the following result: writings of symbolist authors: the roles of faith and mind If you cannot perceive the Truth, you can create it. This in cognition, the rational vs. the irrational, subject-object reveals another aspect in understanding the process of relations; stages of the cognition process, what cognition when the subject merges with the object. stimulates and determines it. This is what reveals a peculiar aspect of the Let us look closer at the correlation between the evocation method: if the poet is, indeed, the Creator, rational and the irrational in the gnoseology of who is the reader, who, in Valery Bryusov’s opinion, symbolism. should be put under a charm with word symbols It is assumed that for symbolists the irrational only arranged in a certain pattern, who should be tricked into determines the search for the truth whereas the rational is the realm of monopolized Truth, i.e. the realm of Non- given almost no thought; they respect intuitivism at best, existence if we go back to Maeterlinck’s terminology. thus one can conclude that empirical knowledge is false What comes most close to the problem of searching in its essence [19]. But how can one explain the the truth and sometimes results from it is the idea of following? Firstly, in terms of the form, how can one creative cosmogenesis in the poetics of senior explain the careful attention to structure with which symbolism.