DOCSLIB.ORG

4.3 the Politics Stream

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4.3 the Politics Stream Research Collection Master Thesis The National Wolf Strategy in Austria An Evaluation of the Wolf Management-Plan and its Formulation Process using the Multiple-Streams Framework Author(s): Schäfer, Marleen Publication Date: 2012 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-007366616 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library The National Wolf Strategy in Austria An Evaluation of the Wolf Management-Plan and its Formulation Process using the Multiple-Streams Framework National Geographic Society 2003 Master Thesis in Environmental Science By: Marleen Schäfer July 2012 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Willi Zimmermann Dr. Christian Hirschi Institute for Environmental Policy and Economics Table of Contents List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................... iv Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ vi Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 The Context .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 The Focus .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Research Questions ............................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Delineation and Outline of the Thesis ............................................................................... 5 2 The Wolf ..................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Biology ................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Emotions in Society ............................................................................................................. 7 2.3 European Wolf Dispersal and Habitat Suitability in Austria ........................................... 7 2.4 Protection Status ............................................................................................................... 11 2.4.1 Bern Convention ........................................................................................................... 11 2.4.2 Habitats Directive ......................................................................................................... 12 2.4.3 National Legislation ...................................................................................................... 13 3 Conceptual Framework and Methodology ................................................................ 16 3.1 The Multiple-Streams Framework ................................................................................... 16 3.1.1 Problem Stream............................................................................................................ 17 3.1.2 Policy Stream ................................................................................................................ 18 3.1.3 Politics Stream .............................................................................................................. 20 3.1.4 Policy Entrepreneurs .................................................................................................... 20 3.1.5 Window of Opportunity ............................................................................................... 21 3.1.6 Stream coupling ........................................................................................................... 22 3.1.7 Applicability of the Multiple-Streams Framework ........................................................ 22 3.2 The Policy Design ............................................................................................................... 23 3.3 Method ............................................................................................................................... 25 3.3.1 Document Analysis ....................................................................................................... 25 3.3.2 Survey ........................................................................................................................... 25 3.3.3 Expert Interviews.......................................................................................................... 26 - i - 4 Case Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 28 4.1 The Problem Stream .......................................................................................................... 28 4.1.1 Problem Recognition .................................................................................................... 29 4.1.2 Problem Definition ....................................................................................................... 31 4.1.3 Focusing Events ............................................................................................................ 32 4.1.4 Indicators ...................................................................................................................... 34 4.1.5 Feedback ...................................................................................................................... 35 4.1.6 Budget .......................................................................................................................... 36 4.2 The Policy Stream .............................................................................................................. 37 4.2.1 Policy community ......................................................................................................... 37 4.2.2 The Management Policy ............................................................................................... 40 4.2.3 Technical Feasibility ...................................................................................................... 40 4.2.4 Value Acceptance ......................................................................................................... 41 4.2.5 Anticipation of Future Constraints ............................................................................... 41 4.3 The Politics Stream ............................................................................................................ 42 4.3.1 National Mood ............................................................................................................. 43 4.3.2 Political Mood .............................................................................................................. 43 4.3.3 Organized Political Forces ............................................................................................ 44 4.3.4 Intra-political Events .................................................................................................... 47 4.4 Policy Entrepreneurs ......................................................................................................... 48 4.5 Agenda-Setting ................................................................................................................... 50 4.5.1 Open Windows but no Stream Coupling ...................................................................... 51 4.5.2 Stream Coupling – was it really successful? ................................................................. 51 4.5.3 Post Coupling ................................................................................................................ 53 5 The Result: The Austrian Wolf Management Plan .................................................. 54 5.1 Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................................... 54 5.2 Evaluative Elements .......................................................................................................... 55 5.3 Operational Elements ....................................................................................................... 56 5.3.1 Regulatory – Direct Measures ...................................................................................... 56 5.3.2 Incentive Mode ............................................................................................................ 57 5.3.3 Direct Supply of Goods and Services ............................................................................ 60 5.3.4 Persuasion and Information ......................................................................................... 61 5.4 Political-Administrative Arrangement and Resources .................................................. 62 5.5 Procedural Elements ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rund Ums Kind 20 Homepage.Pdf
    m´ u s K d i n n u d R d i l m e f B n e e z st ir r k Fü Hartberg- Bezirkshauptmannschaft SozialhilfeverbandSozialhilfeverband Hartberg-Fürstenfeld Hartberg-FürstenfeldHartberg-Fürstenfeld Impressum: Herausgeber: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld Elternberatungszentrum des Bezirkes Hartberg-Fürstenfeld Rochusplatz 2, 8230 Hartberg Tel.: 03332/606-0 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.bh-hartberg-fuerstenfeld.steiermark.at Gestaltung und Realisierung: DSA Marion Wanasky Mag.(FH) Magdalena Kahlbacher Monika Mauroschek Druck: Schmidbauer, Fürstenfeld Vollständigkeit, Irrtümer, Satz- und Druckfehler vorbehalten. Aufgrund der besseren Lesbarkeit wird auf die gleichzeitige Verwendung weiblicher und männlicher Sprachformen verzichtet. Sämtliche Personenbezeichnungen gelten gleicher- maßen für beide Geschlechter. 2 Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld Rund um´s Kind im Bezirk Hartberg-Fürstenfeld Ratgeber über Leistungen für werdende Eltern und Eltern von Kindern bis 6 Jahren im Bezirk Hartberg-Fürstenfeld Stand September 2020 3 Bezirkshauptmann Werte Eltern! Als Vater von zwei reizenden noch minderjährigen Mädchen weiß ich wie schön es ist, Eltern zu wer- den und zu sein. Schon vor der Geburt und natürlich auch nachher ändert sich sehr viel. Das gesamte Leben, ob Tages- ablauf, Freizeitgestaltung oder Urlaub wird an die Kinder angepasst. Die zentrale Aufgabe und Leistung der behördlichen Kinder- und Jugendhilfe ist es, das Kindeswohl zu schützen und die Eltern bestmöglich in ihrer Rolle als Mutter und Vater zu unterstützen. Vieles ist leichter zu verstehen und stellt keine scheinbar unlösbaren Probleme dar, wenn man über die jeweiligen Entwicklungsschritte des Kindes Bescheid weiß. Und es macht vieles leichter, wenn man weiß, wen man im Bedarfsfall fragen und wohin man sich vertrauensvoll wenden kann.
    [Show full text]
  • Gray Wolf Populations in the Conterminous U.S
    Gray Wolf Populations in the Conterminous U.S. Wolves are apex predators on top of the food chain with no natural predators of their own. They play a critical role in maintaining the balance and structure of an ecological community. North American wolf numbers plummeted in the 1800’s and early 1900’s due to decreased availability of prey, habitat loss and in- creased extermination efforts to reduce predation on livestock and game animals. Gray wolves (Canis lupus) were listed as endan- gered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1974. Although wolves today occupy only a fraction of their historic range, conser- vation efforts have helped some populations to meet recovery goals. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) proposed Western Great Lakes gray wolves were delisted in removing protections for gray wolves throughout the U.S. and 2011 but will be monitored for five years to ensure Mexico in 2013 – a final decision is pending. recovery is sustained (Credit: USFWS). Western Great Lakes The FWS published a final rule at the Human-Wolf Conflict Population end of 2011 to delist wolves in Min- nesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Gray wolves of the Western Great Human-wolf conflicts continue Lakes region are mainly found portions of adjoining states. to occur as both populations throughout northern Minnesota and expand, particularly between Wisconsin, Michigan’s Upper Penin- sula, and Ontario.1 In the 1800s and wolves and livestock farmers. early 1900s, unregulated hunting, Social constraints must be government bounties, and diminished carefully considered when de- prey availability nearly eliminated the wolves in the Great Lakes veloping management plans for 2, 3, 4 any wolf population, including region.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd Report by the Republic of Austria
    Strasbourg, 1 December 2006 ACFC/SR/II(2006)008 [English only] SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY AUSTRIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Received on 1 December 2006 ACFC/SR/II(2006)008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I...................................................................................................................................5 I.1. General Remarks..............................................................................................................5 I.2. Comments on the Questions and the Resolution of the Council of Europe ........................7 PART II ...............................................................................................................................17 II.1. The Situation of the National Minorities in Austria .......................................................17 II.1.1. The History of the National Minorities .......................................................................18 The Croat minority in Burgenland ........................................................................................18 The Slovene minority ...........................................................................................................19 The Hungarian minority .......................................................................................................21 The Czech minority..............................................................................................................21 The Slovak minority.............................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Standards for the Monitoring of the Central European Wolf Population in Germany and Poland
    Ilka Reinhardt, Gesa Kluth, Sabina Nowak and Robert W. Mysłajek Standards for the monitoring of the Central European wolf population in Germany and Poland BfN-Skripten 398 2015 Standards for the monitoring of the Central European wolf population in Germany and Poland Ilka Reinhardt Gesa Kluth Sabina Nowak Robert W. Mysłajek Cover picture: S. Koerner Graphic: M. Markowski Authors’ addresses: Ilka Reinhardt LUPUS, German Institute for Wolf Monitoring and Research Gesa Kluth Dorfstr. 20, 02979 Spreewitz, Germany Sabina Nowak Association for Nature “Wolf” Twadorzerczka 229, 34-324 Lipowa, Poland Robert Myslajek Institute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw Project Management: Harald Martens Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN), Unit II 1.1 “Wildlife Conservation” The present paper is the final report under the contract „Development of joint monitoring standards for wolves in Germany and Poland“, financed by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear safety (BMUB). Client: German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB). Contract period: 01.03.2013 - 31.10.2013 This publication is included in the literature database “DNL-online” (www.dnl-online.de). BfN-Skripten are not available in book trade. A pdf version can be downloaded from the internet at: http://www.bfn.de/0502_skripten.html. Publisher: Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN) Federal Agency for Nature Conservation Konstantinstrasse 110 53179 Bonn, Germany URL: http://www.bfn.de The publisher takes no guarantee for correctness, details and completeness of statements and views in this report as well as no guarantee for respecting private rights of third parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Red Wolf a Listable Unit Under the US Endangered Species Act?
    Journal of Heredity, 2018, 585–597 doi:10.1093/jhered/esy020 Original Article Advance Access publication 8 June 2018 Perspective Is the Red Wolf a Listable Unit Under the US Endangered Species Act? Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jhered/article-abstract/109/5/585/5034846 by guest on 22 January 2019 Robin S. Waples, Roland Kays, Richard J. Fredrickson, Krishna Pacifici, and L. Scott Mills From the NOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA (Waples); the Department of Forestry & Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (Kays and Pacifici); the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC (Kays); Missoula, MT (Fredrickson); and Wildlife Biology Program and the Office of Research and Creative Scholarship, University of Montana, Missoula, MT (Mills). Address correspondence to L. Scott Mills at the address above, or e-mail: [email protected]. Received October 25, 2017; First decision January 11, 2018; Accepted May 8, 2018. Corresponding Editor: Fred Allendorf Abstract Defining units that can be afforded legal protection is a crucial, albeit challenging, step in conservation planning. As we illustrate with a case study of the red wolf (Canis rufus) from the southeastern United States, this step is especially complex when the evolutionary history of the focal taxon is uncertain. The US Endangered Species Act (ESA) allows listing of species, subspecies, or Distinct Population Segments (DPSs) of vertebrates. Red wolves were listed as an endangered species in 1973, and their status remains precarious. However, some recent genetic studies suggest that red wolves are part of a small wolf species (C. lycaon) specialized for heavily forested habitats of eastern North America, whereas other authors suggest that red wolves arose, perhaps within the last ~400 years, through hybridization between gray wolves (C.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining and Applying the Concept of Favourable Reference Values for Species and Habitats Under the EU Birds and Habitats Directives
    Defining and applying the concept of Favourable Reference Values for species and habitats under the EU Birds and Habitats Directives Examples of setting favourable reference values Service contract No. 07.0202/2015/715107/SER/ENV.B.3 financed by the European Commission – contractor: Alterra, institute within the legal entity Stichting DLO (now: Wageningen Environmental Research) R.J. Bijlsma1, E. Agrillo2, F. Attorre2, L. Boitani3, A. Brunner4, P. Evans5, R. Foppen6, S. Gubbay7, J.A.M. Janssen1, A. van Kleunen6, W. Langhout4, M. Pacifici3, I. Ramírez8, C. Rondinini3, M. van Roomen6, H. Siepel9, C.A.M. van Swaaij10 & H.V. Winter11 1 Wageningen Environmental Research 2 Comunità Ambiente 3 Istituto Ecologia Applicata 4 Stichting BirdLife Europe 5 Sea Watch Foundation 6 Sovon Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology 7 Susan Gubbay 8 BirdLife International 9 Radboud University Nijmegen 10 Dutch Butterfly Conservation 11 Wageningen Marine Research Wageningen Environmental Research Wageningen, July 2018 Disclaimer: The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Contents Preface 5 1 Cetaceans 7 1.1 Common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) in the European Atlantic 7 1.2 Short-beaked common dolphin
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming Gray Wolf Monitoring and Management 2019 Annual Report
    WYOMING GRAY WOLF MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT 2019 ANNUAL REPORT Prepared by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department in cooperation with the National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services, and Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapahoe Tribal Fish and Game Department to fulfill the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service requirement to report the status, distribution and management of the gray wolf population in Wyoming from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the end of 2019, the wolf population in Wyoming remained above minimum delisting criteria; making 2019 the 18th consecutive year Wyoming has exceeded the numerical, distributional, and temporal delisting criteria established by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. At least 311 wolves in ≥43 packs (including ≥22 breeding pairs) inhabited Wyoming on December 31, 2019. Of the total, there were ≥94 wolves and ≥8 packs (≥7 breeding pairs) in Yellowstone National Park, ≥16 wolves and ≥3 packs (1 breeding pair) in the Wind River Reservation, and ≥201 wolves and ≥32 packs (≥14 breeding pairs) in Wyoming outside Yellowstone National Park and the Wind River Reservation (WYO). In WYO, ≥175 wolves in ≥27 packs resided primarily in the Wolf Trophy Game Management Area where wolves are actively monitored and managed by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department and ≥26 wolves in ≥5 packs in areas where wolves are designated primarily as predatory animals and are not actively monitored. A total of 96 wolf mortalities were documented statewide in Wyoming in 2019: 92 in WYO, 3 in Yellowstone National Park, and 1 in the Wind River Reservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Steirische Spezialitätenprämierung 2020
    Steirische Spezialitätenprämierung 2020 77 Betriebe Prämiert (Fleisch) 34 Betriebe Prämiert (Milch) 111Betriebe gesamt 371 Produkte eingereicht (Fleisch) 114 Produkte eingereicht (Milch) 485 Produkte gesamt 137 Finalisten – Produkte (Fleisch) 44 Finalisten – Produkte (Milch) 181 Finalisten gesamt 57 Finalisten – Betriebe (Fleisch) 21 Finalisten – Betriebe (Milch) 78 Finalisten – Betriebe gesamt Hartberg-Fürstenfeld Kammerobmann: Herbert Lebitsch Bezirksbäuerin: Maria Haas Bergstadl Leitersdorfberg 177, 8271 Bad Waltersdorf Telefon: (03333) 3977 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.bergstadl.com Vertriebswege: Berstadl - Bauernladen Prämiert: Wollschwein - Karreespeck, Hofladen Familie Fiedler GvB Leitersdorf 37, 8271 Bad Waltersdorf Telefon: 0664-2388616 Vertriebswege: Ab Hof, Gastronomie, Spar-Rauch, GenussLaden Lagerhaus Hartberg, Thermenbauerladen, Bauernladen Neuherz, Öl-Mühle Höfler, Spar Markt Allhau, Bauernladen Krenn Gold Finalist: Hauswürstel, Kategorie Fleischwurst Steirische Spezialitätenprämierung 2019/20 1 Mostgut Kuchlbauer Theresia und Anton Haspl GvB Riegersbach 33, 8250 Vorau Telefon: 0664-8619168 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.kuchlbauer.at Vertriebswege: Buschenschank Prämiert: Karree, Frikandeau Sabine Höllerbauer GvB Unterrohr 12, 8294 Unterrohr Telefon: 0664-9305349 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.hoellerbauer.eu Gold Finalist: Osterkrainer, Kategorie Fleischwurst Prämiert: Osterschinken Maria Jeitler und Tochter Karin Jeitler GvB Familie Jeitler – Der Jeitlerhof Reibersdorf 2, 8232 Grafendorf
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 2Nd International Jackal Symposium, Marathon Bay, Attiki Province, Greece Hell
    Ελληνικό Ζωολογικό Αρχείο Hellenic Zoological Archives Number 9, November 2018 The book with the scientific papers of the second international symposium dedicated to the golden jackal and related species 2nd International Jackal Symposium Marathon Bay, Attiki Greece, 31 Oct-2 Nov 2018 With the endorsement of the IUCN Canid Specialist Group The book includes works on the golden jackal, wolf, coyote, Ethiopian wolf, African wolf, side-striped jackal and black-backed jackal species. ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΖΩΟΛΟΓΙΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ HELLENIC ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY Proceedings of the 2nd International Jackal Symposium, Marathon Bay, Attiki Province, Greece Hell. Zool. Arch., No. 9 Nov 2018 ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΖΩΟΛΟΓΙΚΟ ΑΡΧΕΙΟ HELLENIC ZOOLOGICAL ARCHIVES Το Ελληνικό Ζωολογικό Αρχείο είναι ένα διεθνές The Hellenic Zoological Archives is an περιοδικό που δημοσιεύει εργασίες που αφορούν την international journal that publishes articles related πανίδα της Ελλάδας και οι οποίες περιλαμβάνουν to the fauna of Greece, which contain background βασικά δεδομένα απαραίτητα για τη γνώση της. data necessary for its knowledge. Such articles can Τέτοιες εργασίες μπορεί να είναι βιβλιογραφίες, be bibliographies, lists of species, tables with data, κατάλογοι ειδών, πίνακες δεδομένων, μετρήσεων και observations etc. παρατηρήσεων κ.ά. The articles are published in English in separate Οι εργασίες δημοσιεύονται στα αγγλικά σε fascicules at irregular intervals. They include the ξεχωριστά τεύχη, σε μη τακτά διαστήματα. title, the author/s, their addresses, a summary (in Περιλαμβάνουν τίτλο, συγγραφέα/είς, διεύθυνση, Greek and English; the Editors can provide ελληνική και αγγλική περίληψη, εισαγωγή, κυρίως assistance with the translation if needed), an θέμα και βιβλιογραφία. Οι εργασίες γίνονται δεκτές introduction, the main text and the references.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Plan for Gray Wolves in California PART I December 2016
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation Plan for Gray Wolves in California Part I December 2016 Charlton H. Bonham, Director Cover photograph by Gary Kramer This document should be cited as: Kovacs, K. E., K.E. Converse, M.C. Stopher, J.H. Hobbs, M.L. Sommer, P.J. Figura, D.A. Applebee, D.L. Clifford, and D.J. Michaels. Conservation Plan for Gray Wolves in California. 2016. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, CA 329 pp. The preparers want to acknowledge Department of Fish and Wildlife staff who contributed to the preparation of this document. They include Steve Torres, Angela Donlan, and Kirsten Macintyre. Further, we appreciate the agencies and staff from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Wildlife, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for their generous support in our efforts to prepare this document. We are also indebted to our facilitation experts at Kearns and West, specifically Sam Magill. Table of Contents – PART I INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Plan Development ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Plan Goals ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Summary of Historical Distribution and Abundance of Wolves in California .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Coexistence of Large Carnivores and Agriculture in S-Europe
    LIFE 04NAT/IT/000144 - COEX IMPROVING COEXISTENCE OF LARGE CARNIVORES AND AGRICULTURE IN S-EUROPE International Symposium Large Carnivores and Agriculture Comparing Experiences across Italy and Europe Assisi, 9-10 March 2007 Proceedings Report Action F4 – LIFE COEX Contents LIST OF PRESENTATIONS ...........................................................................................................................................................2 ABSTRACTS.........................................................................................................................................................................................3 1. EUROPEAN COMMISSION AND LARGE CARNIVORES................................................................................................................3 2. LUPO E AGRICOLTURA, UN EQUILIBRIO REALISTICO................................................................................................................4 3. IL RUOLO DELLE AZIENDE SANITARIE LOCALI (ASL) NELLA GESTIONE DEI GRANDI CARNIVORI....................................4 4. GRANDI CARNIVORI E AGRICOLTURA - ESPERIENZE A CONFRONTO IN ITALIA E EUROPA.................................................5 5. IL CONTRIBUTO DELLA CE PER LA GESTIONE DEI GRANDI CARNIVORI: IL CASO DELLA PROVINCIA DI PERUGIA............6 6. DISSEMINATION O F DAMAGE PREVENTION PRACT ICES FOR SUPPORTING COEXISTENCE: EXPERIENCES IN THE PROVINCE OF TERNI, ITALY..............................................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Common Management of Brown Bear in the Alpine and Northern Dinaric Region
    Guidelines for Common Management of Brown Bear in the Alpine and Northern Dinaric Region Action A.6: Elaboration of Common guidelines for population-level brown bear management and management plans for Slovenia and Croatia August, 2017 Left blank intentionally. This document was prepared within the LIFE DINALP BEAR project (LIFE13 NAT/SI/000550) Authors: Coordination: Černe Rok Authors of texts: Bartol Matej, Černe Rok, Ferjančič Lakota Taja, Groff Claudio, Huber Đuro, Jerina Klemen, Knauer Felix, Majić Skrbinšek Aleksandra, Reljić Slaven, Skrbinšek Tomaž, Contributors: Bragalanti Natalia, Calderola Sonia, Elmi Marianna, Fattori Umberto, Jeremić Jasna, Jonozovič Marko, Kos Ivan, Krofel Miha, Molinari Paolo, Molinari-Jobin Anja, Musil Tanja, Näbele Olivier, Rauer Georg, Pašić Jasmin, Pedrotti Luca, Potočnik Hubert, Schnidrig Reinhard, Skoberne Peter, Stergar Matija, Trbojević Igor, Vivoda Bojan, Wölfl Manfred Suggested Citation: Černe R., Bartol M., Ferjančič Lakota T., Groff C., Huber Đ., Jerina K., Knauer F., Majić Skrbinšek A., Reljić S., Skrbinšek T. 2017. Guidelines for Common Management of Brown Bear in the Alpine and Northern Dinaric Region. Guidelines prepared within A.6 action of the LIFE DINALP BEAR project (LIFE13 NAT/SI/000550): 28 pp. III Table of contents Background .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose of the document.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]