DOCSLIB.ORG

Studies on Translation and Multilingualism Translation and Language Learning: the Role of Translation in the Teaching of Languages in the European Union

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Studies on Translation and Multilingualism Translation and Language Learning: the Role of Translation in the Teaching of Languages in the European Union Studies on translation and multilingualism Translation and language learning: The role of translation in the teaching of languages in the European Union 1/2013 Translation Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013 Manuscript completed in July 2013 ISBN 978-92-79-30926-7 doi:10.2782/13783 © European Union, 2013 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium PRINTED ON CHLORINE-FREE BLEACHED PAPER Directorate-General for Translation, European Commission Translation and language learning: The role of translation in the teaching of languages in the European Union A Study 15 July 2013 Anthony Pym, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, European Society for Translation Studies Kirsten Malmkjær, University of Leicester Maria del Mar Gutiérrez-Colón Plana, Universitat Rovira i Virgili Research assistants: Alberto Lombardero, Universitat Rovira i Virgili Fiona Soliman, University of Leicester TLL project site: http://www.est-translationstudies.org/research/2012_DGT/tll.html Disclaimer: This study was carried out on behalf of the Directorate-General For Translation of the European Commission. The views and opinions expressed in the study are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the European Commission. [TYPE TEXT] [TYPE TEXT] [TYPE TEXT] Table of Contents General introduction ............................................................................................. 1 1. Methodological issues ....................................................................................... 5 1.1. Research questions ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. What do we mean by language learning? ........................................................................................ 6 1.3. What do we mean by translation? ....................................................................................................... 6 1.4. Selection of case studies ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.5. Cities and regions as case studies ......................................................................................................... 8 1.6. Variables of interest .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.7. Research instruments ................................................................................................................................ 9 2. Review of previous research ............................................................................ 11 2.1. Historical debates over translation and language learning.................................................. 11 2.2. Empirical research .................................................................................................................................... 14 2.3. General guidelines on translation and language learning ..................................................... 26 3. General survey results ..................................................................................... 31 3.1 Response levels ............................................................................................................................................. 31 3.2. Experts’ views .............................................................................................................................................. 32 3.4. Teachers’ views ........................................................................................................................................... 33 3.5. Focus groups ................................................................................................................................................ 35 3.6. Answers to the research questions .................................................................................................... 37 4. Reports on case studies ................................................................................... 43 4.1. Croatia ............................................................................................................................................................ 43 4.2. Finland ............................................................................................................................................................ 47 4.3. France.............................................................................................................................................................. 54 4.4. Germany ......................................................................................................................................................... 61 4.5. Poland ............................................................................................................................................................. 68 4.6. Spain ................................................................................................................................................................ 75 4.7. United Kingdom .......................................................................................................................................... 82 4.8. Schola Europaea ........................................................................................................................................ 94 4.9. Australia ......................................................................................................................................................... 98 4.10. China .......................................................................................................................................................... 106 4.11. United States .......................................................................................................................................... 113 4.12. Comparisons of case-study countries .......................................................................................... 121 5. Classroom activities involving translation ....................................................... 125 5.1. General models of translation activities ...................................................................................... 125 5.2. Examples of activities............................................................................................................................ 127 6. General conclusions and suggestions for future research ................................ 135 Guidelines for future actions .............................................................................. 139 Appendix A: Questionnaire for experts............................................................... 141 Appendix B: Questionnaire for language teachers .............................................. 143 Appendix C: Translation as a set of transferable skills ......................................... 147 Glossary of key terms and teaching methodologies ............................................ 151 References ......................................................................................................... 159 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................... 177 Notes on the research team ............................................................................... 180 [TYPE TEXT] [TYPE TEXT] [TYPE TEXT] Translation and language learning 1 General introduction The active promotion of a Europe that is multilingual and multicultural largely requires that individual citizens be plurilingual or polyglot. This requires the learning of languages, but not only that. The European Council, meeting in Barcelona in March 2002, called for ‘action to improve the mastery of basic skills, in particular by teaching at least two foreign languages from a very early age’. This ‘Barcelona objective’ was then the basis for the 2003 Action Plan Promoting Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity1, where the improvement of language teaching was recognised as a major element in achieving that aim. This was followed in 2006 by a report on The main pedagogical principles underlying the teaching of languages to very young learners2, which offered a review of current research on language learning. In 2007 the European Framework for Key Competences for Lifelong Learning3 mentioned ‘mediation’ in passing but conceptualised language proficiency in terms of the four traditional basic language skills. Also in 2007 there was a more general report on The diversity of language teaching in the European Union4. Meanwhile, data on progress in language learning have been collected in the Eurydice reports on Key Data on Teaching Languages at School in Europe (2005, 2008, 2012)5, in the Eurobarometer reports Europeans and their Languages (2006, 2012)6, which include information on the most common and effective ways of learning a language, and in the First European Survey on Language Competences: Final Report (European Commission 2011)7. Remarkably, none
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Linguistics, Translation and Interpreting in Foreign-Language
    Linguistics, translation and interpreting in foreign-language teaching contexts Anthony Pym and Nune Ayvazyan Version 1.2. July 2016 Draft written for the forthcoming The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Linguistics. A more detailed version of the nineteenth-century material is available in the text “Nineteenth-century discourses on translation in language teaching”. The relations between linguistics, translation (here including interpreting) and foreign- language teaching can be seen as a play of three separate histories that, although once loosely entwined, have been following progressively different paths since at least the 1970s. That history is now one of separate disciplines, each with its own dynamics and debates, whose relative mutual ignorance can be seen as a source of partial misunderstanding. The modern history of foreign-language teaching When adults sign up to learn a foreign language, they are making a considerable investment in an essentially unknown product: languages are vast, complex and daunting, so much so that it is difficult for any learner to compare the virtues of different teaching methods. Approaches thus demarcate themselves by manipulating a limited set of signals. A course may offer rapid progress, limited effort, proven success, an authoritative source, naturalness and above all, in the age of modernity, newness. On any or all of these points, a new approach must score better than all previous approaches. Further, since there are not many more actual values in play, that essential newness requires a clearly visible distinguishing mark with regard to exactly what is supposed to be new, habitually selected from the shortlist of things that can be included or not: grammar, pedagogical progress, orality, written correctness, structural repetition, contextualization, and of course translation.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptions of Selected Libyan English As a Foreign
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Missouri: MOspace PERCEPTIONS OF SELECTED LIBYAN ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHERS REGARDING TEACHING OF ENGLISH IN LIBYA A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri–Columbia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Doctorate of Philosophy By YOUSSIF ZAGHWANI OMAR Dr. Amy A. Lannin, Dissertation Supervisor Dr. Roy F. Fox, Dissertation Co-Supervisor December 2014 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled PERCEPTIONS OF SELECTED LIBYAN TEACHERS OF ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE REGARDING TEACHING OF ENGLISH IN LIBYA Presented by YOUSSIF ZAGHWANI OMAR, a candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. ______________________________________ Dr. Amy Lannin, Chair _____________________________________ Dr. Roy Fox, Co-Chair ______________________________________ Dr. Carol Gilles ______________________________________ Dr. Matthew Gordon DEDICATION To my main reason of being in this world, my dear MOM and my late DAD . To my partner in life, my beloved WIFE . To my vision to the future, my KIDS . To the soul of my late nephew, MOHAMED . To my great adviser, Dr. AMY LANNIN . To my helpful co-adviser, Dr. ROY FOX . To my committee, Dr. MATTHEW GORDON and Dr. CAROL GILLES . To the dean of College of Education, Dr. JOHN LANNIN . To my family in Libya . To my close friends in the United States, DAVID, LANCE, DENNIS . To my colleagues in English Education Department. I humbly dedicate this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Pour L'histoire Du Français Langue Étrangère Ou Seconde, 64-65
    Documents pour l’histoire du français langue étrangère ou seconde 64-65 | 2020 La Méthode directe d’enseignement des langues La méthode Berlitz : entre méthode naturelle et méthode directe Javier Suso López Édition électronique URL : https://journals.openedition.org/dhfles/7868 DOI : 10.4000/dhfles.7868 ISSN : 2221-4038 Éditeur Société Internationale pour l’Histoire du Français Langue Étrangère ou Seconde Édition imprimée Date de publication : 1 décembre 2020 Pagination : 183-202 ISSN : 0992-7654 Référence électronique Javier Suso López, « La méthode Berlitz : entre méthode naturelle et méthode directe », Documents pour l’histoire du français langue étrangère ou seconde [En ligne], 64-65 | 2020, mis en ligne le 24 février 2021, consulté le 28 mai 2021. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/dhfles/7868 ; DOI : https:// doi.org/10.4000/dhfles.7868 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 28 mai 2021. © SIHFLES La méthode Berlitz : entre méthode naturelle et méthode directe 1 La méthode Berlitz : entre méthode naturelle et méthode directe Javier Suso López Introduction 1 Rappelons tout d’abord l’anecdote qui raconte la naissance de la méthode Berlitz : Maximilian Delphinius Berlitz (Mühringen, Württemberg, 1852 – New York, 1921). Après un séjour en France, il s’installe aux États-Unis en 1870 où il enseigne comme professeur de français et d’allemand, avant de prendre en 1878 la direction du Warner Polytechnic College. Ne pouvant plus faire face à toutes ses obligations, il engage un Français, Nicolas Joly, afin de le seconder dans ses cours de français avant de se rendre compte que celui-ci ne parle pas un mot d’anglais.
    [Show full text]
  • Own-Language Use in Language Teaching and Learning: State of the Art
    Northumbria Research Link Citation: Hall, Graham and Cook, Guy (2012) Own-language use in language teaching and learning: state of the art. Language Teaching, 45 (3). pp. 271-308. ISSN 0261-4448 Published by: Cambridge University Press URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000067 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000067> This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/9473/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/policies.html This document may differ from the final, published version of the research and has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies. To read and/or cite from the published version of the research, please visit the publisher’s website (a subscription may be required.) Lang. Teach. (2012), 45.3, 271–308 c Cambridge University Press 2012 doi:10.1017/S0261444812000067 State-of-the-Art Article Own-language use in language teaching and learning Graham Hall Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK [email protected] Guy Cook King’s College London, UK [email protected] Until recently, the assumption of the language-teaching literature has been that new languages are best taught and learned monolingually, without the use of the students’ own language(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of English and American Studies a Study of Popular Natural
    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of English and American Studies Teaching English Language and Literature for Secondary Schools Barbora Křivánková A Study of Popular Natural Teaching Methods in the Czech Republic Master’s Diploma Thesis Supervisor: Nikola Fořtová, B.A., M.A. 2016 1 I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. …………………………………………….. Author’s signature 2 I would like to thank my supervisor Nikola Fořtová, B.A, M.A. for her valuable advice and comments on my work. I would also like to thank my parents and my husband for their support and encouragement during my studies and the process of writing this thesis. 3 Table of contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 6 1. History of the Natural Methods of Language Teaching ............................................... 8 1.1 Grammar Translation Method ...................................................................................... 9 1.2 Reform Movement ..................................................................................................... 12 1.3 The Natural Methods .................................................................................................. 15 2. Current Natural Methods’ Language Schools in the Czech Republic ...................... 20 2.1 Direct Method for English .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Explicitly Incorporating Culture in an Introductory College Level Spanish Class on Student Intercultural Competency
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Middle and Secondary Education Dissertations Department of Middle and Secondary Education 5-11-2018 THE IMPACT OF EXPLICITLY INCORPORATING CULTURE IN AN INTRODUCTORY COLLEGE LEVEL SPANISH CLASS ON STUDENT INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCY Ryan Boylan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/mse_diss Recommended Citation Boylan, Ryan, "THE IMPACT OF EXPLICITLY INCORPORATING CULTURE IN AN INTRODUCTORY COLLEGE LEVEL SPANISH CLASS ON STUDENT INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCY." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2018. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/mse_diss/57 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Middle and Secondary Education at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Middle and Secondary Education Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ACCEPTANCE This dissertation, THE IMPACT OF EXPLICITLY INCORPORATING CULTURE IN AN INTRODUCTORY COLLEGE LEVEL SPANISH CLASS ON STUDENT INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCY, by RYAN NELSON BOYLAN, was prepared under the direction of the candidate’s Dissertation Advisory Committee. It is accepted by the committee members in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree, Doctor of Philosophy, in the College of Education and Human Development, Georgia State University. The Dissertation Advisory Committee and the student’s Department Chairperson, as representatives of the faculty, certify that this dissertation has met all standards of excellence and scholarship as determined by the faculty. _________________________________ __________________________ Gertrude Tinker Sachs, Ph.D. Peggy Albers, Ph.D Committee Chair Committee Member _________________________________ _________________________ Paula Garrett-Rucks, Ph.D. Janice Fournillier, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Lambert Sauveur À L'ombre De Maximilian Berlitz
    4682_AlmaDL_148x210_Finotti_a3.qxp:bozza 1 5-01-2010 16:34 Pagina 1 Q u a Quaderni di ricerca d e r n i d i r i c e r c Dans le cadre des recherches du CIRSIL, qui voient dans l’histoire de a l’enseignement des langues étrangères l’explication du présent, ce cahier analyse le rôle, l’attrait et l’actualité du français Lambert Sauveur, fondateur aux États-Unis dans la seconde moitié du XIX e siècle d’une Lambert Sauveur à l’ombre méthode innovante pour la didactique des langues. La comparaison L avec Maximilian Berlitz, un autre Européen qui fit fortune au delà de a m de Maximilian Berlitz l’Océan, met en lumière les dettes de celui-ci envers le collègue français, b e d’ailleurs masquées par la notoriété que Berlitz a acquise dans le mon - r t de entier au cours de plus d’un siècle. S a Les débuts de la méthode directe Les nombreuses pages de ce cahier consacrées aux extraits des ouvra - u v ges des deux méthodologues visent à offrir une documentation signifi - e u aux États-Unis cative et souvent difficile à repérer. r à l ’ o Irene Finotti est chercheur à l’Université de Milan. Depuis quelques an - m Irene Finotti nées elle s’occupe de l’histoire des méthodologies pour l’enseignement b r du français langue étrangère, notamment de la méthode directe. e d e M a x i m i l i a n B e r l i t z Alma-DL è la Biblioteca Digitale dell’Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2017 Richard Gentile, Editor Volume 37, Number 2 [email protected]
    ™ LILT NEWSLETTER ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ April 2017 Richard Gentile, Editor Volume 37, Number 2 WWW.LILTFL.ORG [email protected] NO PART OF ANY LILT NEWSLETTER MAY BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE EDITOR. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE To Adrienne Greenbaum for her many years of service As my term as President comes to an end, I am happy to to the organization and invaluable and insightful input at have had the opportunity to lead LILT out of hiatus. The our Executive Board meetings. last two years have had both their challenging and To Nancy Russo-Rumore for her advice, ideas and rewarding moments as the Executive Board and I actions which brought LILT into the 21st century by worked many endless hours to assure the continuation securing LILT’s not-for-profit status, making LILT tax of LILT. Working collaboratively, we successfully offered exempt and a public charity, and registering LILT with an exciting conference, professional development the New York State Attorney General. workshops, student competitions, student plaques, To Ron Taub for his incredible expertise in managing poster contests, awards, grants and stipends. our treasury for many years, and for obtaining LILT’s I am pleased to know LILT will indeed have a bright and CTLE approval from the NYS Education Department. promising future. I must thank each member who I would like to reiterate, if you have an interest in helping submitted his or her application for the numerous LILT, please reach out. Whatever time and expertise you positions available for our upcoming elections. It will give can offer to LILT is welcomed, as there is no job too big me great pleasure to present the newly elected, dynamic or too small - more hands make light work.
    [Show full text]
  • UCE-FIL-ESPINOSA ANDREA-VEGA KIMBERLY.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DEL ECUADOR FACULTAD DE FILOSOFÍA, LETRAS Y CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN CARRERA PLURILINGÜE El cambio de código (español-inglés) en la enseñanza del inglés como lengua extranjera Trabajo de Titulación modalidad Proyecto de Investigación previo a la obtención del Título de Licenciado en Ciencias de la Educación mención Plurilingüe. AUTORES Espinosa Hidalgo Andrea Elizabeth Vega Lema Kimberly Sarahi TUTOR: MSc. Rommel Esteban Martínez Loza Quito, 2020 DERECHOS DE AUTOR Nosotras, Andrea Elizabeth Espinosa Hidalgo y Kimberly Sarahi Vega Lema, en calidad de autores y titulares de los derechos morales y patrimoniales del trabajo de titulación “El cambio de código (español-inglés) en la enseñanza del inglés como lengua extranjera”, modalidad de Proyecto de Investigación, de conformidad con el Art. 114 del CÓDIGO ORGÁNICO DE LA ECONOMÍA SOCIAL DE LOS CONOCIMIENTOS, CREATIVIDAD E INNOVACIÓN, concedo a favor de la Universidad Central del Ecuador una licencia gratuita, intransferible y no exclusiva para el uso no comercial de la obra, con fines estrictamente académicos. Conservamos a nuestro favor todos los derechos de autor sobre la obra, establecidos en la normativa citada. Así mismo, autorizamos a la Universidad Central del Ecuador para que realice la digitalización y publicación de este trabajo de titulación en el repositorio virtual, de conformidad a lo dispuesto en el Art. 144 de la Ley Orgánica de Educación Superior. Los autores declaran que la obra objeto de la presente autorización es original en su forma de expresión y no infringe el derecho de autor de terceros, asumiendo la responsabilidad por cualquier reclamación que pudiera presentarse por esta causa y liberando a la Universidad de toda responsabilidad.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching English to Immigrant Students in the United States: a Brief Summary of Programs and Methods
    Education Faculty Works School of Education 10-2003 Teaching English to Immigrant Students in the United States: A Brief Summary of Programs and Methods Francisco Ramos Loyola Marymount University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/education_fac Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Ramos, Francisco. (2003). Teaching English to Immigrant Students in the United States: A Brief Summary of Programs and Methods. Revista Electronica de Investigacion Educativa, 5, 1-14. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Education at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Education Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Please cite the source as: Ramos, F. (2003). Teaching english to immigrant students in the United States: A brief summary of programs and methods. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 5 (2). Retrieved month day, year from: http://redie.uabc.mx/vol5no2/contents-ramos.html Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa Vol. 5, No. 2, 2003 Teaching English to Immigrant Students in the United States: A Brief Summary of Programs and Methods La enseñanza del inglés a estudiantes inmigrantes en Estados Unidos: Un breve resumen de programas y métodos Francisco Ramos Calvo [email protected] School of Education Loyola Marymount University University Hall 2743 One LMU Drive, 90045-2659 Los Angeles, California, United States (Received June 5, 2003; accepted for publishing: October 2, 2003) Abstract Nearly ten per cent of the students currently attending public schools in the United States are classified as English Language Learners (ELL); that is to say, students who are learning English.
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth-Century Discourses on Translation in Language Teaching
    Nineteenth-century discourses on translation in language teaching Anthony Pym Version 3.0. January 2017 This text uses material gathered by Nune Ayvazyan and Anthony Pym for a chapter in the forthcoming Routledge Handbook of Translation and Linguistics, with additional critical reading by Kai Voltmer. Abstract: Renewed attention to the role of translation in language teaching raises questions about the historical origins of anti-translation discourse among contemporary educationalists. The mainstream narrative sees the nineteenth century as being dominated by “grammar translation”, after which the twentieth century received progressive enlightenment from immersion and communicative methods. A survey of the main textbooks nevertheless suggests that most methods in the nineteenth century actually mixed spoken practice in L2 with various forms of translation practice between L1 and L2, to the extent that a monochromatic “grammar translation” is a simplification invented après coup by its opponents. The arguments against translation were initially based on a Romantic ideology of natural acquisition, somehow assuming that all learners were young children, but were then inspired by the experience of immigrants, particularly in the United States, who reflected on their adult mode of immersion. By the end of the nineteenth century, vigorous commercialization of the immigrant experience, notably by Berlitz, contrasted with the more balanced approach of the Reform Movement, which was building on a European tradition where spoken communication and translation both found places in foreign-language teaching. The past decade or so has seen renewed interest in the use of translation activities in foreign-language learning (see Malmkjær 1998, 2004; Cook 2010; Pym, Malmkjær and Gutiérrez 2013), accompanied by various surveys of what language teachers think about translation as a classroom activity (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • LS1ELS ENGLISH LANGUAGE and SOCIETY Autumn Term Lectures 1
    LS1ELS ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND SOCIETY Autumn Term Lectures 1-10 Dr Christiana Themistocleous 1 LECTURE 1 Introducing Applied Linguistics Key reading: *Cook, G. (2003) Applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Chapter 1 & 2) Crystal, D. (1987) The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Chapter on ‘Linguistics’) Davies, A. (2005) A glossary of applied linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Davies, A. and Elder, C. (2004) The handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. (*essential reading) Key concepts: Linguistics Applied Linguistics Sociolinguistics Prescriptive Descriptive Communication Aims of session: To discuss the structure of the course; its aims; the work required; relevant reading and assessment procedures To introduce the module as a whole, and in particular our approach to English Language and Society To begin to answer the questions: What is language? What is communication? How are they related? How is language communicative? How Applied Linguistics can be used to examine the many ways that language is communicative To look at the range of subject areas this module is going to cover. 2 LECTURE 2 Information and Persuasion: The language of advertising Key Reading: Bell, A. and Garrett, P. (1998) Approaches to media discourse. Oxford: Blackwell (Chapters 3, 7) Cook, G. (2001) The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge. *Thomas, Linda et al. (eds) (2004) Language, society and power. London: Routledge. (Chapter 1 & 3.4) Key concepts: Information Persuasion
    [Show full text]