Do Books Cause Revolutions? An Empirical Test of Robert Darnton’s The Forbidden Best-Sellers of Pre-Revolutionary France* Yu Sasaki† This version: March 22, 2020 Preliminary; comments welcome Abstract This article is the first empirical test of Robert Darnton (1995)’s thesis that illegal books clandes- tinely circulated contributed to the French Revolution. The provocative argument has spawned a vibrant industry in historical research but quantitative studies have not been offered. I do so by constructing a new data set that digitizes all 720 illegal works in Darnton’s published corpus. Using the number of émigrés and deaths sentences as my proxies for the Revolution, I show that the diffusion of illegal books has a positive and significant impact on nobles and clergy- men who fled from France but not those who received death sentences. My findings are robust to a host of covariates that could determine diffusion and the two revolutionary outcomes. My analysis implies that an information revolution in which technological progress allows for a fast and inexpensive transmission of information could facilitate a political revolution. *I thank Takayuki Kubouchi for his able research assistance. Financial support from the Joint Usage and Research Center Programs, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University (IERPK1917) is gratefully acknowledged. All errors are mine. †Assistant Professor, Waseda Institute for Advanced Study, Waseda University. E-mail:
[email protected]. See yusasaki.squarespace.com for the most updated version. Introduction In the spring of 2011, a wave of mass mobilization and regime change in the Middle East and North Africa has made scholars reconsider the causes of political revolution.