DOCSLIB.ORG

Epidemiology of Foodborne Diseases Transmitted by Fish, Shellfish and Marine Crustaceans in the United States, 1970-1978

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Epidemiology of Foodborne Diseases Transmitted by Fish, Shellfish and Marine Crustaceans in the United States, 1970-1978 859 Journal ofFood Protection, Vol. 43. No. I I, Pages 859-876 !November 1980) Copyright © 1980, lntemational Association of Milk, Food, and Environmental Sanitarians Epidemiology of Foodborne Diseases Transmitted by Fish, Shellfish and Marine Crustaceans in the United States, 1970-1978 FRANKL. BRYAN U.S. Department ofHealth and Human Services, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, Atlanta. Geo'1:ia 30333 (Received for publication Apri114, 1980) Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/43/11/859/1649529/0362-028x-43_11_859.pdf by guest on 23 September 2021 ABS1'RACT TABLE 1. Percentages of foodbome disease outbreaks of Fish, mollusks, marine crustaceans and marine mammals which fish, mollusks, and crustaceans were vehicles in the were implicated as vehicles in approximately 11 o/o of food borne United States from 1970 to 1978. disease outbreaks reported in the United States during the Percentage years 1970-1978. Tuna, clams, oysters, shrimp, and crab Vehicle frequently were vehicles. These animals can acquire the Fish 7.4 dinoflagellates responsible for ciguatera, paralytic shellfish Mollusks 1.9 poisoning and neurotoxic shellfish poisoning from their marine Marine crustaceans 1.4 habitats. Many common marine organisms found in and on Sea mammals 0.2 fish can decarboxylate histidine to histamine, and do so during Total 10.9 improper storage of fish. Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Clostridium botulinum type E are of marine origin, and C. outbreaks (fable 4), Vibrio parahaemolyticus gastro­ botulinum types A and B can wash from soil into aquatic enteritis was the most frequently reported disease environments. Pollution of estuaries by domestic sewage and attributed to marine crustaceans. subsequent ingestion of raw or improperly cooked shellfish Marine mammals also have been vehicles of a few harvested from the polluted waters have led to outbreaks of outbreaks. Three outbreaks of botulism were attributed typhoid fever, hepatitis A and cholera. Staphylococcal intoxication, shigellosis, salmonellosis, and Clostridium per­ to fermented seal meat, and whale meat was the vehicle fringens gastroenteritis (as well as typhoid fever, hepatitis A in two outbreaks of botulism. Walrus meat was the and cholera) have been acquired because seafoods were vehicle in an outbreak of trichinosis. mishandled during preparation. Preventive and control Previous epidemiologic reviews of fish -associated measures include safe disposal of sewage, monitoring of outbreaks in the United States have appeared in the sanitation practices and food-handling practices, monitoring literature (12,40.41). shellfish and their growing waters for pathogens and indicator Fish-borne and shellfish-borne diseases are described organisms, and education and training. under three categories on the basis of the primary source of their toxigenic or invasive etiologic agents: (a) agents naturally present in aquatic habitats, (b) sewage pollution of aquatic habitats and (c) contamination from Fish, mollusks, marine crustaceans and marine workers, equipment or the environment of food mammals were implicated as vehicles in approximately processing or foodservice establishments. Some diseases, 11 o/o of the outbreaks of foodborne disease reported in however, have multiple sources of contamination. the United States during the period 1970 to 1978 (20) (Table 1). Fish accounted for 7.4%. Outbreaks in which AGENTS NATURALLY PRESENT fish were involved as vehicles were usually ciguatera, IN AQUATIC HABITATS scombroid fish poisoning or botulism. Other etiologic Fish, mollusks, and crustaceans can acquire toxins or agents, however, accounted for up to five outbreaks of pathogens from their aquatic habitat. For example, V. fish-borne disease, and fish were suspected as vehicles of parahaemolyticus is of marine origin. Clostridium many outbreaks of diseases of unknown etiology botulinum type E is commonly isolated from fish, sea (fable 2). Tuna was the vehicle in the greatest number of water and mud. C. botulinum types A and B can wash fish-borne outbreaks. Mollusks were involved in 58, from soil into aquatic environments. Certain marine possibly 59, outbreaks during this period (Table 3). dinot1agellates produce toxins that are transvectored by Approximately 20 o/o of these were outbreaks of paralytic bivalve mollusks and fish. shellfish poisoning. Clams, oysters or dishes made from them were frequent vehicles of mollusk-borne outbreaks. Ciguatera Marine crustaceans, usually shrimp, crab or dishes Halstead (34) listed 6 orders, 28 families, 63 genera made from them, accounted for 42, possibly 43, and 113 species of marine animals reported as vehicles of JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, VOL. 43, NOVEMBER 1980 TABLE 2. Foodborne disease outbreaks in which fish were implicated as vehicles in the United States, 1970 to 1978. Common lllime or type of product Albacore 1 1 Anchovy 1 1 Barracuda 1 Bluefish 3 3 Bonito 1 1 Catfish 1 Codfish 1 1 Codfish stew 1 1 Dolphin/Mahi-mahi 21 2 24 Eel 2 Flounder 1 1 Goatfish 4 1 5 Grouper 24 24 Herring 1 ack, skipjack, amberjack 22 2 25 Kingfish 2 2 Mackeral 2 Mullet 1 3 Northern pike 1 Po'ou (cheilinus) 6 6 Porgy 1 1 Porkfish 1 Puffer fish 1 1 Salmon 3 s 9 Salmon eggs 6 1 7 Sardines Sea bass 1 1 Snapper, red snapper 2 8 12 Sturgeon 1 1 Tuna 19 7 26 Tuna salad 1 1 13 15 Tuna casserole 1 2 4 WhitefiSh s 1 6 Yellowtail 1 1 Fish, unspecified 2 1 3 12 (1)1 21 (1) Fish, marinated 1 1 Fish eggs, unspecified 2 2 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/43/11/859/1649529/0362-028x-43_11_859.pdf by guest on 23 September 2021 September 23 on guest by http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/43/11/859/1649529/0362-028x-43_11_859.pdf from Downloaded FOOD BORNE DISEASES TRANSMITTED BY SEAFOOD 861 ciguatera. Only grouper, skipjack and related species, NlflM,.....'<t"N~Mli) and red snapper, however, have been consistently ~M~ N reported as vehicles in the United States from 1970 to 1978. Most of the reported cases ingested fish caught NNM~~N~~G) from waters near Florida or Hawaii. ~ '4) ~ The fish responsible for ciguatera are usually found in spotty insular areas of the subtropics and tropics. At any 00 given time, fish in one locale around an island may be lf) toxic; in another locale, however, they may be safe. This situation may be reversed later. Poisonous fish are ..... usually found near reefs, and are often larger than the usual specimen of the species. Either they are bottom dwellers-and-feeders, or they are carnivores. The most N toxic organ is the liver; next are the intestines and then Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/43/11/859/1649529/0362-028x-43_11_859.pdf by guest on 23 September 2021 1-- the testes or ovaries. Muscles are the least toxic. A toxic dinoflagellate, Gambierdiscus toxicus, has been dis­ ..... covered and is a possible source of ciguatoxin for fish (78, 79). On some islands, the sale of certain fish that have a M history of causing ciguatera is prohibited. Neither the usual cooking procedures (baking, boiling, frying) nor salting or drying will attenuate ciguatoxin. ..... ..... Shellfish poisonings Paralytic shellfish poisoning is caused by a neurotoxin produced by certain marine dinoflagellates, principally ..... Gonyaulax catanella and Gonyaulax tamarensis. Other species of dinoflagellates that have been incriminated as sources of paralytic, neurotoxic or venerupin shellfish N poisons are Gonyaulax excavata, Gonyaulax acatanella, Gonylaulax polyeda, Pyrodinum phoneus, Prorocentrum micans, Exuvlaella baltica, Exuvlaella moriaelebouriae, ..... ..... lf) Glenodinum foliaceum, and Gymnodinium breve. Paralytic shellfish toxin, sometimes referred to as saxitoxin, is one of the most potent toxins known. ..... M Various mussels, clams, scallops and whelks have been vehicles of paralytic shellfish poisoning. These mollusks become toxic if they feed on toxinogenic dinoflagellates. N The toxin accumulates in the mollusks' digestive glands; high concentrations have been found in the syphons of butter clams and in the gills of other kinds of clams. The N M shellfish are not detrimentally affected by the toxin. Paralytic shellfish poisoning occurs primarily in temperate regions. It has been reported on the west coast ..... of the United States between May and October. On the east coast of the United States, shellfish have become toxic between July and September. Water temperature, 0\..... therefore, has a considerable influence on toxin production. Paralytic shellfish poisoning is often ,.c:: associated with "red tides." Red tides, which are not o+::"' necessarily red, are massive blooms of certain dinoflagel­ I!) OIJ .><:"' 1:: lates. Shellfish can, however, become toxic in waters that ~ :a () :::j do not contain enough toxigenic dinoflagellates to ....tli u I!) .S discolor water. Although mussels can become toxic in a "'I!) OIJ'"' ,.c:: .... I!) tli .;!3 :::j 1:: "C) few days when exposed to waters containing high "C) .D 1:: 0 ,..c:: .-d tn., ;; ~ .a concentrations of toxigenic dinoflagellates, detoxication, ~~~>o+:: 0..~ however, can take a month or more in waters either free "C) ~ ·- f-< I!) ·- 0.. C1) r.n ~ --.:t:: "'d ·.;:- ><..C::..C::..C::o+:l..C::-~ of or containing low concentrations of these agents. ·- r.n v:l v:l C1) v:l ::j ...... ::ED:D:D:oD:::E~ In the United States, most victims of paralytic shellfish JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, VOL. 43, NOVEMBER 1980 862 BRYAN TABLE 3. Foodbome disease outbreaks in which mollusks were implicated as vehicles in the United
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the Half Shell Shellfish Caviar Service
    ON ICE Cold CAVIAR PUFF* 1/8 OZ ..........................................8.00/EA On the Half Shell PADDLEFISH CAVIAR, CULTURED CREAM, POTATO, CHIVES WITH COCKTAIL SAUCE, SHALLOT SAUCE & LEMON SC YELLOW SQUASH ............................................... 10.00 DAILY OYSTER FIX* 1/2 DOZEN ............................... 17.00 LEMON VERJUS, HAZELNUT, CURED EGG YOLK WITH SMOKED DULSE CHIMICHURRI OCTOPUS ESCABECHE* .......................................... 15.00 TODAY’S FEATURES SALINITY SIZE PER CALABRIAN CHILIES, SQUID INK CHICHARRON, OLIVES AFTERNOON DELIGHTS, RI* MED MED 2.75 MARK’S RED SNAPPER CEVICHE* ............................. 14.00 LECHE DE TIGRE, CILANTRO OUTLAWS, FL* HIGH MED 3.00 SMOKED FISH DIP ................................................. 14.00 LOW CO. CUPS, SC* HIGH MED 3.00 EVERYTHING CRACKERS, CHIVES, ORANGE ZEST STONES BAY, NC* MED MED 2.75 ROYAL RED SHRIMP GAZPACHO ............................... 13.00 WELLFLEETS, MA* MED MED 3.00 BRIOCHE, CUCUMBER DUKES OF TOPSAIL, NC* HIGH MED 3.00 SEASONAL GREENS ................................................ 12.00 GREEN GODDESS, SC PEARS, PEANUTS LITTLENECK CLAMS,VA HIGH SM 1.25 ADD SHRIMP OR CRABMEAT +8.00 Shellfish NOt Cold WITH ACCOMPANIMENTS GRILLED OYSTERS ................................................ 20.00 BLUE CRAB CLAWS, NC 1/4 LB .................................. 12.00 UNI BUTTER, PERSILLADE, BLACK LIME MOJO SAUCE, ALEPPO SALTED FISH BEIGNETS .......................................... 14.00 * KOMBU POACHED LOBSTER, ME 1/2 LB ..................... 21.00 THYME,
    [Show full text]
  • Environment for Development Improving Utilization of the Queen
    Environment for Development Discussion Paper Series December 2020 ◼ EfD DP 20-39 Improving Utilization of the Queen Conch (Aliger Gigas) Resource in the Colombian Caribbean A Bioeconomic Model of Rotational Harvesting Jorge Marco, Diego Valderrama, Mario Rueda, and Maykol R o dr i g ue z - P r i et o Discussion papers are research materials circulated by their authors for purposes of information and discussion. They have not necessarily undergone formal peer review. Central America Chile China Research Program in Economics and Research Nucleus on Environmental and Environmental Economics Program in China Environment for Development in Central Natural Resource Economics (NENRE) (EEPC) America Tropical Agricultural Research and Universidad de Concepción Peking University Higher Education Center (CATIE) Colombia Ghana The Research Group on Environmental, Ethiopia The Environment and Natural Resource Natural Resource and Applied Economics Environment and Climate Research Center Research Unit, Institute of Statistical, Social Studies (REES-CEDE), Universidad de los (ECRC), Policy Studies Institute, Addis and Economic Research, University of Andes, Colombia Ababa, Ethiopia Ghana, Accra India Kenya Nigeria Centre for Research on the Economics of School of Economics Resource and Environmental Policy Climate, Food, Energy, and Environment, University of Nairobi Research Centre, University of Nigeria, (CECFEE), at Indian Statistical Institute, Nsukka New Delhi, India South Africa Tanzania Sweden Environmental Economics Policy Research Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Shellfishshellfish Recommendations for Responsible Aquaculture
    SustainableSustainable ShellfishShellfish Recommendations for responsible aquaculture By Heather Deal, M.Sc. As Sustainable Shellfish went to press, the B.C. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries (MAFF) pulled their draft Code of Practice for Shellfish Aquaculture from circulation. This document, upon which much of Sustainable Shellfish is based, was one component in guiding, monitoring, and reg- ulating B.C.’s rapidly growing shellfish industry. The Code was by no means exhaustive – Sustainable Shellfish aims to address its gaps and limitations, including its lack of con- sideration for stringent environmental safeguards on the expanding industry. Now that the Code of Practice has been abandoned by gov- ernment, the shellfish industry is managed via complaints to the Farm Industry Review Board. This board uses "normal farm practices" as a standard, but does not and, according to MAFF, will not define what "normal farm practices" are with regard to aquaculture. In other words, although there is leg- islation in place, there are no longer governmental stan- dards or guidelines specific to this industry. The BC Shellfish Growers Association (BCSGA) does have an Environmental Management System and Code of Practice, which is very similar to that which MAFF pro- duced. The BCSGA Code is not available on their website, so please contact the association directly to request a copy: #7 - 140 Wallace Street Nanaimo, BC V9R 5B1 Tel: (250) 714-0804 Fax: (250) 714-0805 Email: [email protected] The draft government Code of Practice is still available on the David Suzuki Foundation website, www.davidsuzuki.org/oceans. Sustainable Shellfish, used in conjunction with the non- operational Code offers a way forward towards a low impact industry with minimal harmful effects on B.C.’s marine environment and coastal communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Size at Maturation, Spawning Variability and Fecundity in the Queen Conch, Aliger Gigas
    Gulf and Caribbean Research Volume 31 Issue 1 2020 Size at Maturation, Spawning Variability and Fecundity in the Queen Conch, Aliger gigas Richard S. Appeldoorn GCFIMembers, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Population Biology Commons To access the supplemental data associated with this article, CLICK HERE. Recommended Citation Appeldoorn, R. S. 2020. Size at Maturation, Spawning Variability and Fecundity in the Queen Conch, Aliger gigas. Gulf and Caribbean Research 31 (1): GCFI 10-GCFI 19. Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr/vol31/iss1/11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.3101.11 This Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute Partnership is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf and Caribbean Research by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOLUME 25 VOLUME GULF AND CARIBBEAN Volume 25 RESEARCH March 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS GULF AND CARIBBEAN SAND BOTTOM MICROALGAL PRODUCTION AND BENTHIC NUTRIENT FLUXES ON THE NORTHEASTERN GULF OF MEXICO NEARSHORE SHELF RESEARCH Jeffrey G. Allison, M. E. Wagner, M. McAllister, A. K. J. Ren, and R. A. Snyder....................................................................................1—8 WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT SPECIES RICHNESS AND DISTRIBUTION ON THE OUTER—SHELF SOUTH TEXAS BANKS? Harriet L. Nash, Sharon J. Furiness, and John W. Tunnell, Jr. ......................................................................................................... 9—18 Volume 31 ASSESSMENT OF SEAGRASS FLORAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE FROM TWO CARIBBEAN MARINE PROTECTED 2020 AREAS ISSN: 2572-1410 Paul A.
    [Show full text]
  • OHA Issues Advisory for Softshell Clams Along Oregon Coast Removing Skin from Clam’S Siphon Dramatically Reduces Arsenic Levels, Public Health Officials Say
    EDITORS: Oregon Public Health Division staff members will be available for interviews from 4 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. TODAY (July 13) in Room 1-A (first floor), Portland State Office Building, 800 NE Oregon St. July 13, 2015 Media contact: Jonathan Modie, 971-246-9139, [email protected] OHA issues advisory for softshell clams along Oregon Coast Removing skin from clam’s siphon dramatically reduces arsenic levels, public health officials say The Oregon Health Authority is issuing a health advisory for the length of the Oregon Coast for softshell clams because they contain high levels of naturally occurring arsenic. The advisory is most important for people who dig their own clams and target the specific species Mya arenaria, since these clams are not commercially available in markets or restaurants. The advisory, issued today by the OHA Public Health Division, recommends removing the skin from the siphon, or “neck,” of softshell clams before eating them. Softshell clams are found primarily in estuary and intertidal regions of the Oregon coast. This advisory stems from tests the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality performed on a variety of shellfish species collected along the Oregon coast as part of its Water Quality Toxics Monitoring Program. DEQ’s tests found that when analyzed whole without the shell, softshell clams contained unusually high levels of inorganic arsenic. Most of the arsenic was concentrated in the skin covering the clam’s siphon. Researchers found that by removing the skin covering the siphon before eating, the arsenic can be greatly reduced, to levels that are not harmful.
    [Show full text]
  • Monda Y , March 22, 2021
    NATIONAL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOCIATION Program and Abstracts of the 113th Annual Meeting March 22 − 25, 2021 Global Edition @ http://shellfish21.com Follow on Social Media: #shellfish21 NSA 113th ANNUAL MEETING (virtual) National Shellfisheries Association March 22—March 25, 2021 MONDAY, MARCH 22, 2021 DAILY MEETING UPDATE (LIVE) 8:00 AM Gulf of Maine Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Puget Sound Chesapeake Bay Monterey Bay SHELLFISH ONE HEALTH: SHELLFISH AQUACULTURE EPIGENOMES & 8:30-10:30 AM CEPHALOPODS OYSTER I RESTORATION & BUSINESS & MICROBIOMES: FROM SOIL CONSERVATION ECONOMICS TO PEOPLE WORKSHOP 10:30-10:45 AM MORNING BREAK THE SEA GRANT SHELLFISH ONE HEALTH: EPIGENOMES COVID-19 RESPONSE GENERAL 10:45-1:00 PM OYSTER I RESTORATION & & MICROBIOMES: FROM SOIL TO THE NEEDS OF THE CONTRIBUTED I CONSERVATION TO PEOPLE WORKSHOP SHELLFISH INDUSTRY 1:00-1:30 PM LUNCH BREAK WITH SPONSOR & TRADESHOW PRESENTATIONS PLENARY LECTURE: Roger Mann (Virginia Institute of Marine Science, USA) (LIVE) 1:30-2:30 PM Chesapeake Bay EASTERN OYSTER SHELLFISH ONE HEALTH: EPIGENOMES 2:30-3:45 PM GENOME CONSORTIUM BLUE CRABS VIBRIO RESTORATION & & MICROBIOMES: FROM SOIL WORKSHOP CONSERVATION TO PEOPLE WORKSHOP BLUE CRAB GENOMICS EASTERN OYSTER & TRANSCRIPTOMICS: SHELLFISH ONE HEALTH: EPIGENOMES 3:45–5:45 PM GENOME CONSORTIUM THE PROGRAM OF THE VIBRIO RESTORATION & & MICROBIOMES: FROM SOIL WORKSHOP BLUE CRAB GENOME CONSERVATION TO PEOPLE WORKSHOP PROJECT TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2021 DAILY MEETING UPDATE (LIVE) 8:00 AM Gulf of Maine Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Puget Sound
    [Show full text]
  • Spisula Solidissima) Using a Spatially Northeastern Continental Shelf of the United States
    300 Abstract—The commercially valu- able Atlantic surfclam (Spisula so- Management strategy evaluation for the Atlantic lidissima) is harvested along the surfclam (Spisula solidissima) using a spatially northeastern continental shelf of the United States. Its range has con- explicit, vessel-based fisheries model tracted and shifted north, driven by warmer bottom water temperatures. 1 Declining landings per unit of effort Kelsey M. Kuykendall (contact author) (LPUE) in the Mid-Atlantic Bight Eric N. Powell1 (MAB) is one result. Declining stock John M. Klinck2 abundance and LPUE suggest that 1 overfishing may be occurring off Paula T. Moreno New Jersey. A management strategy Robert T. Leaf1 evaluation (MSE) for the Atlantic surfclam is implemented to evalu- Email address for contact author: [email protected] ate rotating closures to enhance At- lantic surfclam productivity and in- 1 Gulf Coast Research Laboratory crease fishery viability in the MAB. The University of Southern Mississippi Active agents of the MSE model 703 East Beach Drive are individual fishing vessels with Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564 performance and quota constraints 2 Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography influenced by captains’ behavior Department of Ocean, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences over a spatially varying population. 4111 Monarch Way, 3rd Floor Management alternatives include Old Dominion University 2 rules regarding closure locations Norfolk, Virginia 23529 and 3 rules regarding closure du- rations. Simulations showed that stock biomass increased, up to 17%, under most alternative strategies in relation to estimated stock biomass under present-day management, and The Atlantic surfclam (Spisula solid- ally not found where average bottom LPUE increased under most alterna- issima) is an economically valuable temperatures exceed 25°C (Cargnelli tive strategies, by up to 21%.
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Handling and Storage
    Seafood Health Facts: Making Smart Choices Balancing the Benefits and Risks of Seafood Consumption Resources for Health Care Providers and Patients • seafoodhealthfacts.org Patients and Consumers Seafood Safety Seafood Handling and Storage This section provides practical advice for consumers to help them transport, store and prepare seafood products to ensure safety and maximize quality. Introduction There are a number of very good resources for consumers on the safe handling and storage of seafood. The links to the web sites where these resources can be found are provided at the end of this page. If you would like more in-depth information, please go directly to these sites. The following summary was adapted from “A Consumer Guide to Safe Seafood Handling” by Doris Hicks, University of Delaware and “Fresh and Frozen Seafood: Selecting and Serving Safely” from the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Overview Safe handling and storage of all food should follow the same basic guidelines that are listed below. However, seafood is more perishable then many food items, and the consumer must pay a little more attention to its careful handling. Whether a consumer buys seafood from a market or catches/harvests fish and shellfish on their own, proper handling, storage and preparation are necessary to maintain quality and ensure safety. Although there are many types of seafood available from commercial sources or from recreational fishing, all fish and shellfish are highly perishable, and the same basic storage and handling guidelines should be followed: Keep it cold, Keep it clean, Store it quickly, Prepare and cook it properly.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri's Freshwater Mussels
    Missouri mussel invaders Two exotic freshwater mussels, the Asian clam (Corbicula and can reproduce at a much faster rate than native mussels. MISSOURI’S fluminea) and the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha), have Zebra mussels attach to any solid surface, including industrial found their way to Missouri. The Asian clam was introduced pipes, native mussels and snails and other zebra mussels. They into the western U.S. from Asia in the 1930s and quickly spread form dense clumps that suffocate and kill native mussels by eastward. Since 1968 it has spread rapidly throughout Missouri restricting feeding, breathing and other life functions. Freshwater and is most abundant in streams south of the Missouri River. In You can help stop the spread of these mussels by not moving the mid-1980s, zebra mussels hitched a ride in the ballast waters bait or boat well water from one stream to another; dump and of freighter ships traveling from Asia to the Great Lakes. They drain on the ground before leaving. Check all surfaces of your have rapidly moved into the Mississippi River basin and boat and trailer for zebra mussels and destroy them, along with westward to Oklahoma. vegetation caught on the boat or trailer. Wash with hot (104˚F) Asian clam and zebra mussel larvae have an advantage here water at a carwash and allow all surfaces to dry in the sun for at because they don’t require a fish host to reach a juvenile stage least five days before boating again. MusselsMusselsSue Bruenderman, Janet Sternburg and Chris Barnhart Zebra mussels attached to a native mussel JIM RATHERT ZEBRA CHRIS BARNHART ASIAN CLAM MUSSEL Shells are very common statewide in rivers, ponds and reservoirs A female can produce more than a million larvae at one time, and are often found on banks and gravel bars.
    [Show full text]
  • Fda and Epa Safety Levels in Regulations and Guidance
    APPENDIX 5: FDA AND EPA SAFETY LEVELS IN REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE This guidance represents the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff responsible for implementing this guidance. If you cannot identify the appropriate FDA staff, call the telephone number listed on the title page of this guidance. This appendix lists FDA and EPA levels relating to safety attributes of fish and fishery products. In many cases, these levels represent the point at which the agency could take legal action to include removing product from market. Consequently, the levels contained in this table may not always be suitable for critical limits. Regardless of an established level or not, FDA may take legal action against food deemed to be adulterated as defined by the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) [21 U.S.C. 342]. A food is adulterated if the food bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health under section 402 (a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Additionally, a food is adulterated if the food has been prepared, packed or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health under section 402 (a)(4) of the FD&C Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Should I Buy Farmed Fish and Shellfish Grown in the United States?
    What about the quality of water in Do U.S. farm-raised fish and shellfish contain Why should I buy farmed fish and shellfish grown in aquaculture systems? hormones, antibiotics and other drugs? the United States? Discharges from U.S. aquaculture facilities must meet the standards of the In the U.S., very few drugs have been approved for use with aquatic animals. Strict The U.S. has some of the strictest environmental and product safety rules and Environmental Protection Agency as well as stringent state and local regulations. withdrawal times are followed so that drug residues do not remain when fish and regulations found anywhere, but more than 88% of all the seafood consumed in the U.S. Water released is often re-used shellfish reach the market. The FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) works is imported. Almost half of that total is farm-raised, often in countries that do not have for irrigation or treated and with government agencies and aquaculture associations to maintain the safety stringent environmental and food safety regulations. Consumers are concerned about recycled for fish culture and other and effectiveness of all approved drugs. Before a drug is approved for use in U.S. “buying local,” product safety, and food quality. U.S. fish and shellfish producers can purposes. For an aquatic farm aquaculture, it must be shown that it will not harm the environment or public health. help meet those consumer needs. to be profitable, it is essential that excellent water quality be How can U.S. farm-raised fish contribute to a maintained in the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Populations: Surf Clam
    "Wllf Po latioi Surf C4 Background last fewyears, this intrusion may have caused mortality in larger surf clams. The possible effects of increased water temperature in the mid-Atlantic region Atlantic surf clams, Spisula solidissima, are distributed in the western North may be a gradual northward shift in the distribution of surf clams. This shift may Atlantic from the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence to Cape Hatteras. Commer- have been indicated in the increase in New York's surf clam biomass over the cial concentrations are found primarily off New Jersey, the Delmarva Penin- past few years after several years of good recruitment in the late 1990s. sula, and on Georges Bank. In New Jersey, surf clams are found from the beach zone to a depth of about 60 meters (m). Below 40 m, however, DEP estimated the total surf clam standing stock for 2003, in New Jersey, to be abundance is low.1 between 3.5 and 4.9 million bushels. The estimated standing stock steadily declined from 15.6 million bushels in 2000 to 4.2 million bushels in 2003. This New Jersey's commercial inshore surf clam season begins October 1 and represented a continuation of the downward trend from the maximum of 26.3 extends to May 31 each year. The Commissioner of the Department of million bushels recorded in 1997 (see chart below). Stock estimates are conser- Environmental Protection, with the advice of the Atlantic Coast Section of the vative because they assume 100 percent removal of all size classes of surf New Jersey Shellfisheries Council and the Surf Clam Advisory Committee, clams within the path of the dredge.
    [Show full text]