The designations employed and the presentataion of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opEnion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its fron- tiers or boundaries.
The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors alone and do not imply any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAQ. The papers have not been formally reviewed for clearance or trans- lated.
For copies: Regional Forestry Officer FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Maliwan Mansion 39 Phra Atit Road Bangkok 10200 Thailand Tel.: (662) 281-7844 Fax: (662) 280-0445 RAP PUBLICATION: 1995/11
After UNCED: Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Forest Principles in Asia and the Pacific
Report of the orkshop on the Follow-up to UNCED and Implementation of the Forest Principles
FAQ/RAP Bangkok 16-19 January, 1995
edited by Patrick B. Durst André L. Stewart and Bérénice Muraille
L If I_ q U ~_. I
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (RAP) Bangkok 1995 Foreword
The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) was a defining event forforestry and natural resources management forthe 1990s and beyond. UNCED was unique among international conferences with respect to the number and level of participants attending, the degree of enthusiasm generated, and the magnitude of commitments made by countries to ensure the health of the world's environment.
Of particular relevance to forestry, UNCED delegates agreed to the "Non-legally binding authoritative statement of principles for a global consensus on the management, conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests" (generally referred to as the "Forest Principles'), and Chapter 11 of Agenda 21 ("Combating Deforestation"). These accords provide the foundation for vital reforms in the way the world's forests are managed and used. A significant aspect of these agreements is an enhanced appreciation for the environmental aspects of forests and forestry. Underpinning all UNCED agreements is an uncompromising recognition of the firm bonds between environmental protection and sustainable development.
In the nearly three years since the Rio de Janeiro summit, many countries and organizations have made significant progress in implementing the forest-related agreements of UNCED. The countries of Asia and the Pacific have actively contributed to these positive changes. Still, a great deal more is needed to achieve widespread forest management that is truly sustainable.
To help assess the progress of countries in Asia and the Pacific in implementing the forestry agreements reached at UNCED, and to identify issues of regional concern for consideration by the U.N. Commission on Sustainable Development when it reviewed progress in the forestry sector, a regional workshop was convened in Bangkok in January, 1995. The workshop successfully drew upon the experiences of countries and organizations in the region in formulating conclusions and recommendations that were forwarded to the Commission on Sustainable Development, through FAQ's Committee on Forestry.
In reviewing the documentation from that workshop, FAQ and UNEP staff realized that the papers presented at the workshop—particularly the statements provided by country participants—revealed useful insights into the efforts of countries in the region to put into practice the lofty rhetoric espoused at the Earth Summit in Rio. Much of the information contained in the country statements has not yet been widely publicized or disseminated. It was recognized, therefore, that these experiences, along with the conclusions of the workshop, would be of interest to a much broader audience than the small group of individuals who participated in the workshop. For this reason, FAO is pleased to publish this summary of the workshop deliberations and edited statements presented by the participants.
A.Z.M. Obaidullah Khan Assistant Director-General and Regional Representative of FAQ Acknowledgements
The FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific gratefully acknowledges the support of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) for providing core funding to organize and implement the Workshop on the Follow-Up to UNCED and Implementation of the Forest Principles in Asia and the Pacific. UNEP funding has also made possible the publication and dissemination of this document. The FAQ Tropical Forests Action Programme provided funds to support the participation of National Forest Action Programme Coordinators from several countries at the workshop. FAO and UNEP are especially grateful to the participants of the workshop, who contributed so substantially despite having only limited time to prepare for the workshop. Contents
\/orkshop Report ...... 1
Introduction...... 3 Global and Regional Experience in hnpleemnting Agenda 21 (Chapter 11, "Combating Deforestationt') and the Forest Principles...... 5 Asia and the Pacific Countries' Progress and Experiences in Implementing Agenda 21 and the Forest Principles 8 Working Group Reports...... 13
(i)pening Addresses...... 21
Beyond the Rio Rhetoric...... 22 UNEP Statement...... 27
List of Participants...... 33
CountryStateirients ...... 37
Bangladesh...... 39 Bhutan ...... 43 China...... 45 Fiji ...... 48 India...... 53 Indonesia...... 60 Japan ...... 63 Republic of Korea ...... 65 Lao People's Democratic Republic 67 Nepal...... 70 Papua New Guinea...... 74 Philippines...... 78 SriLanka...... 86 Thailand...... 91
REPORT OF THE WORKSHOP ON FOLLOW-UP TO UNCED AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FOREST PRINCIPLES IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC 16-19 January 1995 Bangkok, Thailand
Context and Objectives of the Work- I. INTRODUCTION shop The Regional Workshop on the Follow-Up to UNCED and Implementation of the Forest Prin- Since the convening of the United Nations Con- ciples was held at the FAO Regional Office for ference on Environment and Development Asia and the Pacific in Bangkok, Thailand, from (UNCED), several governments and interna- 16 to 19 January 1995. The meeting, sup- tional agencies have recognized the need to ported by the United Nations Environment restructure their environmental sectors and Programme (UNEP) and the FAO Tropical For- policies as recommended in Agenda 21. Many ests Action Program (TFAP), was organized by positive actions have already been taken by the FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pa- governments, NGOs, and international orga- cific (FAO/RAPA). nizations in Asia and the Pacific. However, it has become apparent that, since the signing Participants in the Workshop included senior of the Rio Declaration and the Forest Principles, forestry professionals and coordinators of Na- the implications of these agreements for sus- tional Forest Action Programs (NFAPs) from the tainable management of forest ecosystems are following countries: Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, yet to be fully understood or appreciated at the Fiji, India, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Ko- local, national, and regional levels. rea, Lao PDR, Nepal, Papua New Guinea, Phil- ippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Vanuatu. Also Given that the United Nations Commission on participating were representatives from the Ja- Sustainable Development (CSD) was to review pan Environment Agency, United Nations Envi- progress on the implementation of Agenda 21 ronment Programme (UNEP), United Nations forestry recommendations in April 1995, it was Development Programme (UNDP), and the considered important for countries of the Asia- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Pacific region to be given the opportunity to highlight issues of particular concern to the Nations (FAO). region to the CSD. This Workshop was thus The Workshop was opened with addresses organized by the FAO Regional Office for Asia from Mr. Dong Qingsong, FAO Deputy Re- and the Pacific (FAO/RAPA), with financial gional Representative, and Mr. Suvit Yodamni, support from UNEP and FAO/TFAP. UNEP Regional Director and Representative. The overall objective of the Workshop was to The Workshop was chaired by Mr. Jose Malvas, review and assess the progress of Asia and Jr., Director of the Forest Management Bureau, Pacific countries in implementing the forestry- Philippines Department of Environment and related agreements reached at UNCED, par- Natural Resources. Mr. Ram Swarup, Con- ticularly Chapter 11 of Agenda 21 ("Com- servator of Forests of Fiji, was elected Vice- bating Deforestation"), and the Non-legally bind- Chairman. Mr. Thosapala Hewage, NFAP ing authoritative statement of principles for a Coordinator for Sri Lanka, served as Rapporteur. global consensus on the management, conser- vation and sustainable development of all types
Workshop Report of forests (generally referred to as the 'Forest iv) National Forestiy Action Programs Principles"). The Workshop was designed to for the Implementation ofAgenda 21 provide Asia-Pacific countries an opportunity to and the Forest Principles (prepared highlight achievements, issues, constraints, and by the NFAP Support Unit, FAO/ recommendations of particular relevance for Rome). countries of the region. b) country statements and reports on the The specific objectives of the Workshop were progress and constraints in implement- to: ing Agenda 21 and the Forest Prin- ciples. Review the progress and constraints in implementing Agenda 21 and the For- est Principles in countries of Asia and Working Groups the Pacific; To facilitate greater interaction and discussion, Identify forestry issues and recom men- the participants were organized into two work- dations of particular importance to the ing groups to discuss the most significant Asia-Pacific region to be brought to the achievements of Asia-Pacific countries in attention of the CSD, when it reviews implementing Agenda 21, problems and con- progress in the forestry sector; and, straints encountered, and issues of particular importance to the Asia-Pacific region to be Provide the CSD (through the Commit- brought to the attention of the CSD. tee on Forestry and the Ministerial Meet- ing to be organized by FAQ in March, Working Group I discussed the following 1995) with recommendations on the themes related to Agenda 21 and the Forest use of National Forest Action Plans for Principles: the implementation of UNCED Agenda 21 in forestry. • Conservation, management and over- all aspects of sustainable development of forests Documentation • Sustainable use of forests and related The basic documentation for the Workshop aspects of economic development consisted of: • Role of major groups and social aspects a) resource papers prepared by FAO and of forests UNEP, including the following:
i) Review of the Forest Principles 20 Working Group II discussed the following Months after Rio (prepared by themes: UNEP/Nairobi); • Institutional strengthening and capac- i) Summary Note on Areas of ity building Progress, Experiences, and Se- lected Issues in UNCED Follow-Up • International and regional cooperation with Emphasis on Developing and support Countries (prepared by FAQ! Rome); • Forestry issues relating to other Chap- ters of Agenda 21 and international iii) Implementation of Agenda 21 and agreements the Forest Principles in Asia and the Pacific: Draft Discussion Paper (prepared by FAO/RAPA);
4 workshop Report • TFAP as an instrument to implement It was noted that practical pre-UNCED actions Agenda 21 and the Forest Principles in sustainable forest management have con- tinued, but, more importantly, there has been a A synthesis of the conclusions of the Working focus on creating the conditions to facilitate Groups is provided in Part IV of this report. even faster progress in the future. In this re- spect, actions have been initiated to balance environment with development in policies, leg- II. GLOBAL AND REGIONAL EXPERI- islation, strategies (such as National Forestry ENCE IN iMPLEMENTING AGENDA 21 Action Plans), programs, and institutional ar- (CHAPTER II, "COMBATING DEFOR- rangements. Since UNCED, there has also ESTATION") AND THE FOREST PRIN- been an increased recognition of the external driving forces behind forest loss and degrada- CIPLES tion such as poverty, rapid population growth, policy incentives that support inappropriate Progress, experiences, and selected issues land uses, high levels of consumption, waste, in UNCED follow-up with emphasis on de- and pollution. veloping countries The environmental aspects of forests, includ- The Workshop was briefed on global perspec- ing greater attention to conservation (such as tives of the UNCED process and arrangements biodiversity and protected areas) have been for review of forestry by the CSD, (Mr. Mafa given a higher profile since UNCED. The pace Chipeta), UNCED Follow-up Focal Point for in achieving balance between environment and Forestry in FAO. Mr. Chipeta also outlined the development, however, and approaches for roles of FAO in pre-CSD preparations and pre- doing so, have not always been perceived the sented elements from the draft Task Manager's same way by all interest groups—governments, report on forests. NGOs, and the private sector. This has caused controversy, creating the need for consensus Observing that Asia and the Pacific is extremely building on a priority basis. vast and diverse, Mr. Chipeta indicated that it would be unrealistic and inappropriate to ex- To create a basis to assess progress, some pect a "joint," or common, position on issues countries have cooperated to develop criteria for consideration by the CSD. Instead, a range and indicators for sustainable forest manage- of issues which reflect the diversity of situa- ment, although so far with limited participa- tions was viewed as appropriate. tion from the developing countries. These in- dicators could partly be used in certificating The Workshop was reminded that central to forest products in international trade. Progress UNCED agreements was the recognition that and experiences were also presented with re- both development and environment must be gard to: the elimination of earlier unilateral re- given a central role in the way ahead and that strictions in the timber trade; changes in pro- there should be no question of choosing be- duction and consumption patterns; lack of in- tween environment and development. Either novation in international cooperation and its one on its own is inadequate and continuing poor coordination; modest flows of unsustainable, while the two are mutually sup- official development funding; limited technologi- portive. cal development and technology transfer; in- stitutional weaknesses and need for capacity Highlights on post-UNCED progress made to- building; modest progress in involving major ward this main UNCED goal were given, with groups and people in forestry; and outstand- a special focus on developing countries. Ex- ing deficiencies in information on the state of amples were also drawn from the developed forests and on their valuation. countries of the region, including Australia, Japan, and New Zealand.
vvorkshop Repoil It was reported that there have been no specific Progress in incorporating environmen- actions to initiate review of the non-legally-bind- tal concerns into forestry under ing Forest Principles which the countries had Agenda 21 and the Forest Principles agreed to keep under review. To provide a ba- sis to decide whether, and, if so, in what direc- Mr. Bai-Mass M. Taal, Senior Program Officer tion to go forward, it was reported that FAO was with UNEP's Terrestrial Ecosystems Branch, arranging for review of merits of various options presented an overview perspective on progress at the March 1995 meeting of the Commthee on in incorporating environmental concerns into Forestry and the Meeting of Ministers respon- forestry since UNCED. He noted the signifi- sible for forestry which will follow it. cance of Principle 4 of the Rio Declaration, which states that: A detailed outline of arrangements for achiev- ing convergence of ideas, initiatives and pro- "to achieve sustainable development, posals, so as to reach CSD with a harmonized environmental protection shall consti- and coherent message for the sector was out- tute an integral part of the development lined. Of particular importance will be the March process and cannot be considered in 1995 session of the FAO Committee on For- isolation from it." estry (COFO) and its associated special Meet- ing of Ministers responsible for forestry. These Complementing this principle are several para- will be preceded by consultations with NGO5, graphs and elements of the Forest Principles the private sector, representatives of organiza- calling for holistic and balanced approaches in tions leading various initiatives to develop cri- forest development, incorporating all aspects teria and indicators of sustainable forest man- of environmental, social, and economic devel- agement, TFAP coordinators, and the CSD's opment. own preparatory Inter-Sessional Working Group. Before COFO and the Ministerial Meet- The Forest Principles are significant as they ing, regional perspectives are to be enriched reflect, for the first time, a general consensus by the convening of FAO/UNEP regional meet- on all types of forests. They constitute a politi- ings, sessions of some FAQ Regional Forestry cal document, affirming general values, while Commissions (and of a special meeting of the Chapter 11 of Agenda 21 provides an action bureaux of regional commission) and from plan to achieve the objectives outlined in the country reports still being provided to FAQ. Principles and other forest-related UNCED out- puts. The Workshop was informed that a draft, which would serve as the basis for the UN Secretary- The countries are still grappling with how to General's report to the CSD had been prepared incorporate environmental concerns into for- by FAQ and sent to the Secretary General's estry. For example, in Asia, 49 percent of all Office in early December 1994, using inputs forest areas are designated for wood produc- received from governments, NGOs, private tion, compared with 14 percent for environmen- sector associations and inter-governmental or- tal protection. ganizations. Detailed information was given on FAQ arrangements to ensure that information Since Rio, there have been a number of initia- from the regional consultations could be chan- tives or processes to put into action the Forest nelled to CSD through the COFO process. Principles. A number of countries, however, have focused only on particular elements of the Forest Principles for implementation.
6 Workshop Report Workshop Report ]
The most developed element is 8(d): formula- • The Republic of Korea's National For- tion of criteria, guidelines, and methodologies est Plan (incorporating development and for sustainable forest management. In line with conservation of forests) this element are the Montreal and Helsinki Pro- cesses for the development of criteria and in- These developments indicate that improve- dicators. ments have been made in incorporating envi- ronmental concerns into forestry since UNCED. All four program areas of Chapter 11, and the Preamble of Agenda 21, call for an increase in partnership to achieve the Rio Declaration. Con- National Forestry Action Plans for the siderable progress has been made in this area. Implementation of Agenda 21 and The Global Forest Conference, convened in In- Forest Principles donesia in early 1993, was the first global initia- tive after Rio. It resulted in the Bandung Decla- Mr.. Darmo Suparmo, TFAP Adviser for Asia ration, calling for enhanced international part- and the Pacific, presented an assessment of nership to address global forest problems. the experience in using National Forestry Ac- tion Plans to implement Agenda 21 and the Other international processes that have at- Forest Principles. TFAP has evolved consid- tempted to incorporate environmental concerns erably, with continuous feedback and adjust- into forestry include: ment, since it was formulated in the mid-I 980s. The goal of TFAP is to promote the sustain- Indo-British Forestry Initiative; able use of tropical forest resources to meet local and national needs, by fostering interna- Malaysia-Canada Initiative; tional and national partnerships to manage, protect and restore forest resources for the CIFOR-lndonesia Policy Dialogue on benefit of present and future generations Science, Forests and Sustainability. throughout the world.
Similar efforts at the national level attempt to The key features and essential characteristics enhance environmental considerations in for- of TFAP are: est management. They include the following: implementation by the country; Canada's Model Forest Program; involvement by all concerned partners; • Indonesia's eco-labelling and certifica- tion preparatory activities; harmonization and coordination;
India's National Conservation Strategy; • action oriented by identification of is- sues; China's National Agenda 21; flexibility Bangladesh's Forestry Master Plan; The use of National Forestry Action Plans as a • Japan's system of forest management tool for implementing sustainable forest man- and forest ecosystem reserves; agement is explicitly encouraged in Chapter 11 of Agenda 21. • Philippine's "Banner Program 1994;"
7 Workshop Report The TFAP, or parallel Forestry Master Plan pro- III. ASIA AND PACIFIC COUNTRIES' cess, has been adopted by 21 developing coun- PROGRESS AND EXPERIENCES IN tries in Asia and the Pacific. Ten countries in IMPLEMENTING AGENDA 21 AND THE the region are implementing NFAP programs. FOREST PRINCIPLES China has successfully completed the Simao Forest Action Plan (SFAP) project, and Hunan UNCED served to effectively elevate the issues Province of China is likely to hold a roundtable and concern for the world's environment, includ- meeting to facilitate further actions. It is antici- ing forests. The long-term nature of forestry pated that two other countries (i.e., Bangladesh and the extensive requirements needed to solve and Thailand) will reach the implementation major forestry problems, however, preclude dra- phase of their NFAPs in 1995. matic positive change in the sector. Much of the progress that has been achieved since NFAPs are most successful when they are well UNCED has been related to the continuation or integrated within the overall national develop- the acceleration of earlier programs. Common ment program of the country. This has happened across most countries, have been preparatory in most countries which have initiated NFAPs in actions to create an environment conducive to Asia and the Pacific. effective future practical action, including aware- ness raising, attitude adjustment, preparation A number of problems have been encountered of standards, policy changes, planning and in the preparation and implementation of NFAPs. strategy development, and institutional improve- They include the following: ment.
• weak country capacity in the coordina- UNCED reflected the conviction that the for- tion of partners in NFAP preparation and estry sector should allow environmental con- implementation; siderations to permeate all development and become a central rather than peripheral issue. • insufficient funds to support NFAP pro- It also highlighted the role of non-governmen- grams, especially in the areas of forests tal interests (including those of forest-depen- products utilization, non-wood forest dent communities) in sustainable forest devel- products development, and plantation opment and the inter-sectoral nature of many development; key forestry concerns. For the forestry sector, awareness of this among policy-makers and • failure to involve all concerned partners, planners and the associated attitude change including NGOs, from the beginning of has been among the major areas of world-wide NFAP exercises; progress since UNCED.
• insufficient information and data upon The change in attitude has prompted efforts to search for early achievement of sustainable for- which to base forest resources manage- est management and to develop the neces- ment. sary criteria and indicators to measure the Workshop participants strongly endorsed the progress towards this goal. The development TFAP process and agreed that NFAPs can be of criteria and indicators which will permit cer- effective tools for the implementation of Agenda tification, will also lay the foundation for non- 21 and the Forest Principles. The participants discriminatory trade in sustainably-produced noted that FAQ's capacity to support the TFAP timber from all types of forests and should make process should be enhanced to ensure effec- bans and boycotts unnecessary, tive development and implementation of NFAPs.
8 Workshop Report International debate is increasingly concerned Management, conservation, and sus- with how to integrate national development tainable development of forests considerations with global environmental ben- efits such as ameliorating climate change or At UNCED, and on numerous following occa- conserving genetic pools. A standing issue is sions, countries of the region have committed how to provide incentives or compensation to themselves to achieving and practicing sus- those countries or communities which forego tainable forest management. ITTO's Objec- rights to utilize their forests in order to contrib- tive 2000 provided initial impetus in this area, ute to global environmental security. which has gained added momentum since U NC ED.
New or Adapted Policies, Plans and Most countries of the region have accelerated Strategies reforestation efforts since UNCED. The plant- ing programs of China, India, Indonesia, and Most countries of the region are reorienting Viet Nam are especially noteworthy for their forest policies and strategies in line with scale. In 1994, FAQ initiated a new regional UNCED and Agenda 21. For example, in Ma- project to support reforestation programs in laysia, a revised National Forestry Policy was Bhutan, Lao People's Democratic Repub- approved in 1992 and a new National Forestry lic, Myanmar, and Viet Nam. Act in 1993. Further, land was designated as permanent forest estate and a continuous for- Several countries have harmonized their poli- est monitoring system was made operational cies on forest concession management. In- in 1993. From 1993 Malaysia granted private donesia, for example, has been implement- forest plantations owners full tax exemption of ing legislation which makes it possible for the between 5 to 10 years under various fiscal ini- government to assume the management of tiatives. Bangladesh, Cambodia, Myanmar, concessions which do not fully comply with and Samoa have also recently adopted new regulations by establishing joint ventures be- forest policies. Sri Lanka is revising its For- tween the concession holder and government estry Master Plan of 1986 to incorporate more forest enterprises. environmental considerations into its forest management plans, and India has recently Since UNCED, there has been increased at- begun developing a National Forestry Action tention to conservation, exemplified by the cre- Plan. Japan has introduced a new "Forest ation or expansion of protected areas in sev- Management System Based on River Basin" eral countries. Under its pilot phase, the Glo- approach to enhance forest management bal Environment Facility funded several devel- across different ownerships. oping country projects in the Asia-Pacific re- gion, largely on protected areas, including wild- Several countries, including China and the life management. Similar support is being pro- Philippines, have developed comprehensive vided by the World Bank and the Asian Devel- national Agenda 21 programs. India has de- opment Bank in Indonesia. veloped an Environmental Action Plan, which provides a framework for Agenda 21 actions. The preparation and implementation of NFAPs Promotion of sustainable patterns of have continued after UNCED. IUCN-assisted production and consumption National Conservation Strategies have contin- ued to be prepared, while in some countries, As the leading suppliers of tropical wood prod- National Sustainable Development Strategies ucts, Asia-Pacific countries are very concerned (NSDS) are ready. about initiatives in developed countries which threaten their traditional markets. Partly to
9 Workshop Report respond to concerns in market countries, Asia- Paper fiber recycling is emphasized in the re- Pacific producers are actively promoting the gion. In Japan, the waste paper utilization rate development and application of criteria and in- is over 50 per cent; in the Philippines, about dicators for sustainable forest management. three-fourths of all waste paper is now recycled. Indonesia and Malaysia have taken the lead in In Singapore and Hong Kong, the rate is nearly this area and may soon start sustainability cer- 100 per cent. tification. Pre-UNCED programs to improve efficiency of Several countries in the region have initiated ef- wood stoves (to reduce fuelwood demand) have forts to reduce logging damage and negative continued in many countries. impacts of forest operations. For example, Ma- laysia, Indonesia, India, and the Philippines A development with significant conservation have active programs to test and encourage re- implications in the Asia-Pacific region is the duced impact logging. rapid increase in rubberwood processing as a substitute for certain tropical hardwoods that Fiji has recently adopted a model logging code risk depletion. In Malaysia, rubber clones that designed to enforce environmentally sound for- are more suited for timber production are being est harvesting. Australia, Fiji, New Zealand, developed. Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, and Vanuatu are drawing up a regional code of conduct that will set minimum standards for log- Role of major groups and social as- ging and export of timber. pects of forests
Forest industries in the region remain relatively Non-governmental organizations inefficient in terms of wood conversion into marketable products. Some countries (e.g., Environmental organizations are rapidly gain- Philippines) are undergoing major restructur- ing power and influence in many countries of ing of the their industrial processing sector to the Asia-Pacific region. Building on their al- modernize equipment and adapt to the reali- ready formidable base, environmental NGOs ties of reduced raw material supplies, smaller in India, Thailand, and the Philippines have logs, and increased dependency on plantation- significantly expanded their power since grown wood. UNCED. In Thailand, advocacy groups have strongly influenced the pace of development Since UNCED, increased attention has been and the orientation of the Master Plan for For- focused on non-wood forest products and ser- estry and the design of a major GEF-supported vices (such as ecotourism) as potential alter- protected area program. In other countries of natives to more damaging timber harvesting. the region, fledgling advocacy groups are be- Several countries in the region are increasing ginning to exert increasing influence in forestry emphasis in these areas. However, the lack of debates. In Indonesia, for example, a con- knowledge of complex management, utilization, sortium of environmental groups recently el- and marketing aspects of these products and evated public awareness of forestry issues con- services is limiting more rapid development. siderably by encouraging debate over reallo- Concerns also exist that non-wood forest prod- cation of government reforestation funds. ucts might be over-exploited the same way that timber resources have been in some places.
10 Workshop Report In addition to local NGOs, international NGOs An important government incentive which can actively support conservation and sustainable be provided for sustainable forest management forest management throughout Asia and the is the adoption of policies supportive of private Pacific. Since UNCED, such organizations investment and entrepreneurship into value- have been especially active in developing lo- adding industries instead of simple trade in raw cal capacities in many countries with previously materials. An example of what investment in limited links to the international NGO commu- technology, human resources development, nity, such as Bhutan, Cambodia, China, Lao and local entrepreneurship can achieve is the People's Democratic Republic, and Viet evolution of forest utilization in Indonesia from Nam. International NGOs have also aggres- export of raw logs to local processing of timber sively promoted the development and applica- products. tion of criteria and indicators of sustainable for- est management and the certification of wood products. Other major groups and civil society
Various "operational" NGOs and community- Tribal and clan ownership and management based organizations have played a critical role of forest resources has a long tradition in Papua in practical implementation of grassroots con- New Guinea, Fiji, Vanuatu, and other South servation and forest-based livelihood programs Pacific countries. In Fiji, the Native Land Trust and in local empowerment and capacity build- Board assists in the management of forest land ing. To benefit from perceived NGO strengths, in many areas. In other areas, forest manage- many international and government agencies ment decisions are made exclusively by local are closely working with NGOs. In the Philip- groups or in collaboration with government or- pines, for example, some protected areas are ganizations. now co-managed by the government and envi- ronmental NGOs. Local governments and communities are be- ing given increasing levels of responsibility for The commercial private sector forest management and protection in several countries of the region. A recent trend toward The commercial private sector is critically im- decentralization and devolution of forest man- portant for forestry in Asia and the Pacific. The agement responsibilities to local governments, high level of commercial exploitation in some user groups, local communities and individu- countries of the region means that private com- als has taken place in Bangladesh, India, the panies wield tremendous influence over for- Philippines, Nepal, New Zealand, Viet Nam, estry, particularly in the management, utiliza- China, Lao People's Democratic Republic, tion, and marketing areas. and Indonesia.
The transition from centrally planned econo- Such decentralization and devolution has not mies toward market economies in China, Lao released central governments from all forestry People's Democratic Republic, Mongolia, related responsibilities, however. Important Myanmar, and Viet Nam is presenting new technical assistance, monitoring, and regula- opportunities and challenges for the private tory duties remain. In many cases, however, commercial sector and the governments in- the staff needs of central government forestry volved. These countries are being faced with agencies have changed dramatically, and gov- great opportunities and risks as forest man- ernment forest departments are strugglingly to agement and exploitation are opening up to identify their roles in the rapidly changing re- private-sector investment, privatization of state source management environment. corporations, and joint ventures with interna- tional firms.
11 Workshop Report Forest-dependent peoples are highlighted un- Asia and the Pacific receives a relatively large der the new forestry policy of the Asian Devel- portion of the international funding for forestry, opment Bank which intends to give them an but the funding patterns are highly uneven. The economic stake in forests. Viet Nam and India Philippines, for example, has obtained over have variously encouraged participation by lo- 100 percent of the external funding needs iden- cals and forest dwellers. tified under its TFAP process, while Fiji, Lao People's Democratic Republic, and Viet Nam have received less than 25 percent of their iden- Institutional strengthening and capac- tified needs. ity-building
Post-UNCED capacity building efforts have been Technology transfer and technical coopera- at three levels: creating an "enabling environ- tion ment;" building up the capacities of government institutions; and strengthening NGO, local com- Since UNCED, two major new international or- munity and individual citizen capabilities. The ganizations have been established in Asia. most deliberate post-UNCED initiative in capac- These are the Center for International Forestry ity building remains UNDP's Capacity 21, Research (CIFOR), and the Southeast Asian launched in 1993. UNDP's Country Capacity Regional Research Program of the International for National Forest Programs (CCNFP), which Center for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF). complements Capacity 21 is designed espe- In addition, the International Tropical Timber cially to enhance the capacity of countries to Agreement, under which ITTO operates, was manage national forest programs. Consider- renegotiated with a mandate to strongly pursue ably more funding is needed for these programs the goals of sustainable forest management to succeed in meeting their objectives. throughout the region and the world.
Several other regional organizations funded by International and regional cooperation bilateral organizations are making significant contributions toward sustainable forest man- and support agement objectives. Among these are the Regional Community Forestry Training Center, Finance the Asian Institute of Forest Management, and the ASEAN-Canada Tree Seed Centre. The two main multilateral funding organizations supporting forestry in Asia and the Pacific are The FAO-executed Forestry Research Support the World Bank and the Asian Development Program for Asia and the Pacific (FORSPA), Bank. Forestry lending by the World Bank in funded by the Asian Development Bank and the early 1990s has more than doubled com- UNDP, provides a model for promoting low-cost pared with the early 1980s. Since 1977, the South-South technology sharing. Asian Development Bank (AsDB) has made cumulative forestry loans amounting to US$ 794.32 million (annual average US$ 39.7 mil- Recent developments and experiences in lion). international cooperation In terms of financing technical assistance in Given that many environmental issues are forestry, the leading source in the UN system trans-boundary, regional cooperation will be in- is UNDP, particularly through allocations un- creasingly important. A prime example of such derthe Indicative Planning Figure (IPF) of coun- cooperation is provided by the recent agree- tries. In 1993 UNDP provided US$ 20.3 mil- ment by the Prime Ministers of Australia, Fiji, lion for forestry worldwide through FAO alone. New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Asia received more than US$ 10 million in UNDP support for forestry in 1992.
12 Workshoo Report Islands and Vanuatu to work toward a com- for example, has recently drafted a comprehen- mon code of conduct relating to logging and log sive Biodiversity Action Plan and begun its exports from indigenous forests. implementation.
Many countries in the region are similarly ac- tive in various initiatives designed to pursue IV. WORKING GROUP REPORTS the goals of UNCED. Among these are the Indo-British Initiative; the Canada-Malaysia Ini- During the course of the Workshop, Working tiative, CI FOR-Indonesia Policy Dialogue, and Groups separately discussed achievements, the Montreal Process. It is important to note constraints, and issues in seven thematic ar- that many of these processes initiated in the eas related to the implementation of Agenda Asia-Pacific region. 21. Working Group I addressed the first three themes, while Working Group II focused on With assistance from ITTO, Indonesia and the second four themes. The groups met in Malaysia have recently established a trans-fron- plenary to thoroughly discuss all conclusions tier reserve in a key area of more than I million and recommendations of both groups. This hectares straddling the two countries' border in summary, therefore, represents the consensus Borneo. conclusions and recommendations of the en- tire Workshop.
Forestry elements relating to other chapters of Agenda 21 and the Con- WORKING GROUP I ventions. Theme 1: Conservation, manage- A few countries (e.g., Indonesia and Viet ment and sustainable development of Nam) have raised agricultural yields, which forests may lead to an eventual reduction in the rate of forest clearing for new farm land. Poverty, and Major achievements in the region: policies resulting in reduced access to yield en- hancing inputs (including some elements of - Adopted National Forestry Action Plans structural adjustment) are holding many other or Master Plans for Forestry; countries back in this area. - One country (Indonesia) formulated Several countries in Asia and the Pacific (par- and adopted a national land use policy ticularly the middle-income countries) have demonstrated considerable success in reduc- - Community and participatory forestry ing their rates of population growth. Others practices were promoted and en- have made little progress in this area. hanced;
Some countries in the region (e.g., Malaysia) - Awareness, on the part of all people, to have pilot projects on carbon sequestration environmental issues and the role of for- through reduced impact logging or reforesta- ests and trees were greatly enhanced; tion. The number and extent of protected With support from the World Bank, AsDB, and areas in most countries have been sub- other donor organizations, many countries in stantially increased, and some coun- the region are devoting considerable attention tries have enacted new laws for im- to the conservation of biodiversity. Indonesia, proved management of protected ar- eas;
13 Workshop Report - Most countries have formulated and ap- biodiversity of importance to the coun- proved new national forest policies; try and the world, and to strengthen the effectiveness of protected area man- All countries committed increased invest- agement. ment and resources for forest develop- ment and environmental amelioration. Theme 2: Sustainable use of forests and related aspects of eco- Major constraints to effective implementa- nomic development: tion: Major achievements in the region: - Lack of firm political will; - Most nations have either rationalized or - Conflicting forest use function and ab- taken steps to rationalize annual allow- sence of conflict resolution mecha- able harvest of forest products; nisms; Several countries have taken steps to - Unresolved land tenure issues; improve harvesting systems, reduce damaging skidding practices, and mini- - Funding inadequacies; mize soil disturbances through the ap- plication of low impact logging and the - Lack of appropriate forestry technology adoption of revised logging codes; and research support; Some countries imposed restrictions on - Lack of adequatly trained human re- the export of logs and primary products; sources and institutional capacity. instead they are promoting in-country processing and the export of value- added products; Issues of particular importance to be brought to the attention of the CSD: - Steps have been taken to increase the recycling of forest products and to re- - All nations should be called upon to for- duce waste; mulate national land use policies; Environmental impact assessment pro- All nations should be reminded to for- cedures have been established for for- mulate and adopt NFAPs, or similar ap- estry and other land use, and for forest propriate forest management plans, and industries in a number of countries; endeavor to implement them in an ef- fective manner; - One country (Philippines) introduced a system of environmental management All nations should be requested to cre- charges; ate Forest Development Funds as ap- propriate, to augment their existing Steps have been taken to promote tour- funding commensurate with forestry de- ism (including ecotourism), resulting in velopment requirements; new opportunities for rural development and increased revenue earnings from All countries should be encouraged to forest areas. support the establishment of protected areas that adequately conserve the
14 Workshop Report
Major constraints to effective imple- the free trade of all forest products mentation: derived from sustainably managed for- ests. - Lack of clear political decisions on ways to satisfy community needs from for- ests; Theme 3: Role of major groups and so- cial aspects of forests - Conflicts between short-term economic interests in forests and sustainable for- Major achievements in the region: est management requirements; Land titles and usufructuary rights of - Unilateral trade restrictions; indigenous people on forest land have received greater recognition; the needs - Improper identification of research pri- and wishes of indigenous people have orities and reluctance to invest in rel- been given increased attention; evant research programs; People's awareness and understand- - Lack of appropriate technologies and ing of sustainable forest management mechanisms to transfer such technolo- and environmental degradation issues gies; have improved;
- Lack of investment funds; - Mechanisms for sharing the benefits from sustainable forest management - Absence of appropriate evaluation tech- have been expanded; niques for environmental costs and benefits. Decision making and consultation on forest management issues have been decentralized and broadened in most Issues of particular importance to be countries; brought to the attention of the CSD: The contributions of environmental Nations should be urged to improve groups across many sectors to the plan- mechanisms for the transfer of forestry- ning and implementation of forest man- related technology; agement have received greater appre- ciation; Influence liberalized Official Develop- ment Assistance (ODA) from developed Volunteers (e.g., NGOs, boy scouts, to the developing countries as envis- school groups, environmental organi- aged in UNCED 1992; zations, etc.) have been mobilized for tree planting and forest protection to a Nations should be requested to honor greater extent than in the past. international laws and agreements gov- erning the free trade of all forest prod- ucts; non-discriminatory and multilater- Major constraints to effective implementa- ally agreed rules and procedures, and tion: open and free international trade in for- est products, should be facilitated; - Poor communication and understand- ing between forestry personnel and for- Nations should be urged to explore and est neighbors/indigenous people; develop mechanisms that encourage
15 Workshop Report Communication and publicity inadequa- equately address the issues of sustain- cies; able management of forests;
- Lack of knowledge and institutional ca- Lack of coordination among the differ- pacity to deal with the needs of special ent agencies and organizations con- groups in and near forests. cerned with land use and management of natural resources;
Issues of particular importance to be Lack of national land use and forest poli- brought to the attention of the CSD: cies.
Governments should be encouraged to recognize the role of major groups in Issues of particular importance to be dealing with the social aspects of for- brought to the attention of the CSD: estry, and improve coordination and co- operation with them to help solve forest Financial and technical support to coun- management problems. tries that do not have land use and for- est policies should be accelerated to enable them to develop and implement WORKING GROUP 2 such policies;
Theme 4: Institutional Strengthening - Country capacity for planning, policy re- and Capacity Building search, and analysis should be strengthened; Major achievements in the region: - Networks to exchange research results - Frequent and significant international fora and other information should be en- on issues related to forestry; hanced;
Since UNCED, three global initiatives on The process of involving NGOs and the implementation of the Forestry Prin- communities in the management of for- ciples were started in the countries of ests should be accelerated; this re- the region; quires considerable training and sensi- tizing of community leaders, forestry - Considerable progress has been made personnel, and NGOs for which train- in developing criteria and indicators for ing-of-trainers should be given a high sustainable use of forest resources; priority;
Governments should take steps to en- Major constraints to effective implementa- sure adequate budgetary support for tion: forestry institutions;
Forestry is generally given a low priority An improved coordinating mechanism in developing economies; for country capacity building should be Lack of institutional capacity to ad- developed and institutionalized.
16 Workshop Report
Theme 5: International and Regional FAO should become a focal point for
Cooperation and Support technological support and, to fulfill its mandate, it may examine options to
Major achievements in the region: strengthen its organization.
- Bilateral assistance in forestry has in- creased considerably since UNCED; Theme 6: Forest Issues Relating to other Chapters of Agenda A number of cooperative initiatives (e.g., 21 and International Agree- Bandung Declaration, Malaysia- ments Canada, and lndo-British) have been started with the objective of furthering Major achievements in the region: international dialogue on the implemen- tation of the Forest Principles; - Many countries have signed the Con- ventions on Biodiversity and Combating A recent ministerial-level meeting was Desertification; convened at ESCAP in Bangkok where Agenda 21 issues were discussed and - The extent of protected areas in the re- an action plan was approved. gion has been increased;
Programs linking improved agricultural Major constraints to effective implementa- production with forestry (e.g., ICRAF's tion: program on alternatives to slash-and- burn agriculture) have been initiated in - Inadequate funding through multilateral the region since UNCED. agencies;
- Skewed distribution of international Major constraints to effective implementa- funding; tion:
- Lack of coordination among donor - Lack of coordination among govern- agencies; ment agencies with responsibilities for inter-related issues affecting forestry; - Inadequate technology transfer; - Lack of mechanisms for the manage- - Reduced capacity in FAO to focus on ment of shared ecosystems across le- forestry issues due to resource con- gal boundaries; straints. - Rapidly changing lifestyles and de- mands of rural people in developing Issues of particular importance to be countries; brought to the attention of the CSD: - Poverty and land hunger; There is a need for greater devolvement of funds from international donors and - Poor understanding of the diversity of a more equitable system of disburse- biological resources. ments should be ensured;
- The pace of technology transfer should be accelerated;
17 Workshop Report Issues of particular importance to be brought to the attention of the CSD: - Countries should be encouraged to in- crease cooperation in controlling the All countries should be encouraged to trade and use of endangered wildlife; sign the Convention on Combating De- sertification and share their relevant ex- Countries should be encouraged to re- periences and technologies of combat- view all land use, agriculture, rural de- ing desertification. Special funding velopment, and other policies related to mechanisms to support these efforts forestry for their potential negative im- should be ensured; pacts on forests, and revise them to reduce or eliminate damaging effects on Considering the fact that mountain ar- forests. eas are watersheds of the river systems that ensure food security, and are frag- ile ecosystems, countries should be Theme 7: TFAP as an Instrument to urged to give special attention to the Implement Agenda 21, preparation of effective management (Chapter 11, "Combating plans for such areas; Deforestation") and Forest Principles Considering that sound agricultural and rural development is vital to the health of Major achievements in the region: forests, nations should be encouraged to fully integrate rural development and National Forest Action Plans and For- agriculture; efforts to enhance the devel- estry Master Plans play an important role opment of rural industries and other in- in supporting implementation of the For- come and employment alternatives estry Principles in more than 20 coun- should be given high priority; tries in Asia and the Pacific;
In view of the importance of conserving The evaluation and revision of the TFAP biodiversity for future generations, the and Master Plan processes have led to CSD may wish to consider the following greater complementarity in supporting recommendations: the Forest Principles.
> protected area networks should Major constraints to effective implementa- be expanded tion:
> surveys of biological resources - FAQ's capacity to service the TFAP pro- should be accelerated cess is limited;
> intellectual property rights issues Many partners (including national gov- related to biodiversity should be ernments in some countries) have given resolved a low priority to the implementation of NFAPs; > the rate and level of the transfer of biotechnology should be en- - Weak institutional capacity to implement hanced. NFAPs;
- Lack of adequate financial resources.
18 Workshop Report Issues of particular importance to be - Financial and institutional support to brought to the attention of the CSD: TFAP should be enhanced; TFAP should receive adequate admin- - Country capacity to implement NFAPs istrative and financial support from all should be strengthened on a priority partners; basis. All countries that have not already done so should initiate NFAPs, or similar com- prehensive forestry planning exercises, on a priority basis;