Career Development Office 2021 – 2022 Recruitment Planning Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Career Development Office 2021 – 2022 Recruitment Planning Guide Career Development Office 2021 – 2022 Recruitment Planning Guide http://law.richmond.edu/career (804) 289-8638 [email protected] 2021 – 2022 Recruitment Planning Guide Table of Contents Hiring Practices Summary ...............................................................................................................2 Description of Recruitment Programs .............................................................................................7 Southeastern Minority Job Fair (SEMJF) ....................................................................................7 Southeastern Intellectual Property Job Fair (SIPJF) .................................................................11 Loyola Patent Law Interview Program .....................................................................................12 New England Interview Program (NEIP) .................................................................................14 August/Early Fall On-Campus Interview Program ...................................................................15 Equal Justice Works Conference and Career Fair .....................................................................17 Spring Interview Programs ........................................................................................................18 Recruiting Programs Dates and Deadlines ....................................................................................19 Frequently Asked Questions ..........................................................................................................22 On-Campus Interview (OCI) Applications ...............................................................................22 Interviews ..................................................................................................................................23 Offers .........................................................................................................................................26 Other Questions .........................................................................................................................27 Sample Documents ........................................................................................................................28 Guide to Summer Employment Evaluations ..................................................................................43 Best Practices for Preparing and Submitting Applications ............................................................46 NALP Guidelines ...........................................................................................................................48 Richmond Law Interview and Offer Policies ................................................................................50 Staff and Contact Information .......................................................................................................51 1 Hiring Practices Summary Introduction Depending on where you are in the career development process, your first and second summer may have vastly different purposes. The goal of your first summer is to explore your options and further develop your legal knowledge and fundamental skills such as research and writing. It is an opportunity to learn more about your interests and how they relate to various areas of legal practice. Ideally, by your second summer, you can begin to tailor your experiences toward your post-graduate employment goals. Further, during your second summer it is important to increase your substantive knowledge and demonstrate your interest in or commitment to a particular kind of work. For these reasons, you must approach your second summer and post-graduate search thoughtfully. The summary below provides general information about the summer and post-graduate employment process for a variety of employers. This information is designed to help you over the summer months as you begin to plan your 2L summer employment search. Schedule an appointment to meet with your career advisor to discuss these practices further and develop your search strategy. Multi-Pronged Approach As you think about the various Richmond Law-sponsored recruitment opportunities available, it is important to remember that employers hire in a variety of ways. The National Association for Law Placement (NALP) reports that only 19.8% of law students nationally in the Class of 2019 secured their post-graduate position via a fall on-campus recruitment program. That number increases to 24.9% when you add other job fairs and spring on-campus interviews. A multi-pronged search incorporating formal recruitment programs such as On-Campus Interview (OCI) and Government and Public Interest Interview Programs (GPIIP), job postings, unsolicited applications, and networking efforts significantly increases your likelihood for success. This multi-pronged approach worked for Richmond Law 2Ls in securing their 2019 summer employment: 42% obtained jobs through formal recruitment programs, 25% from job postings in Symplicity, 35% through direct applications and networking, and 7% were rehired by previous employers. We have focused on summer 2019 employment in this guide because summer 2020 was atypical as a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic. In response to the public health crisis, the law school community solicited a variety of school-paid opportunities in the private sector and additional opportunities on campus to make up for positions that had been cancelled. Large Law Firms Large law firms rely almost exclusively on their summer associate programs as the primary method for hiring entry-level attorneys. Typically, these firms interview second-year law students in the summer and early fall for summer associate positions the following summer. Last recruiting cycle, these employers interviewed sporadically throughout the fall and during organized recruitment programs in late January and early February. Offers of post-graduate employment are made at the conclusion of the 2L summer. In most circumstances, large law firms do not interview third-year students for post-graduate employment. Thus, if you want to work at a large law firm immediately after graduation, it is important to secure a position with one during your 2L summer. There may be opportunities to join these firms following a judicial clerkship or later in your career after gaining some practice experience. Large law firms are among the most grade-conscious of legal employers. Strong academic credentials and participation in co-curricular activities, including law journals and moot court, are highly valued. 2 Some large law firms, particularly those in Virginia, will participate in Richmond Law’s August on- campus interview program (August OCI). However, it is important that you supplement your August OCI applications with direct applications to other law firms in which you have an interest, especially firms outside of Richmond. Early July is an appropriate time to apply to firms that are not participating in OCI. The NALP Directory is a good resource for learning more about and directing applications to large law firms. In addition to making direct applications, it is important to take advantage of opportunities to participate in any spring and summer programming, including networking receptions and mock interview programs, offered by law firms in which you have an interest. From the Richmond Law Class of 2019, 13% secured their first post-graduate position in law firms of over 100 attorneys. Small and Mid-Size Law Firms The majority of attorneys in private practice work in small (fewer than 50 attorneys) and mid-size (50-100 attorneys) law firms. In fact, according to the American Bar Association, more than 60% of lawyers work in small firms. With few exceptions, small law firms hire on an as-needed basis in the same manner as most other employers. Few participate in OCI. They often seek summer associates or interns during the spring semester, and entry-level attorneys following the release of bar exam results. Some will post opportunities, while others will rely on unsolicited applications or their referral networks to identify new attorneys. Though small and mid-size firms cannot always make post-graduate hiring decisions following summer employment, developing a relationship with a small firm of interest and demonstrating related practice area expertise through your summer work, clinical placements, and pro bono work will increase your chances of landing post-graduate employment. Personality fit, practice-area-specific knowledge, and geographic ties (key to successful client development) are among the most important factors to small and mid-size law firms when making hiring decisions. During the 2019-2020 OCI programs, 19 small and mid-size law firms interviewed 2Ls, while during the 2020 – 2021 cycle, 3 firms in that size range recruited our students. In addition, Richmond Law co-hosts the Commonwealth Law School Consortium’s Spring Interview Program (SIP) every March, in which Richmond Law students participate with students from the law schools of Washington & Lee, William & Mary, and the University of Virginia, exclusively for small and mid-size firms. In 2020, 10 small and mid-size law firms interviewed 2Ls. In 2021, 14 small and mid-size law firms interviewed 2Ls through SIP. For additional information about applying to small and mid-size law firms, review Choosing Small, Choosing Smart: Job Search Strategies for Lawyers in the Small Firm Market by Donna Gerson (available in the Career Development Office
Recommended publications
  • Spotlight on Public Finance
    Spotlight on Public Finance Fall 2016 Newslett er Featured Arti cle 1 Events 5 Practi ce Focus 3 Att orney Spotlight 6 Att orneys in Acti on 4 Did You Know? 7 FEATURED ARTICLE LEVERAGING PRIVATE SECTOR KNOW-HOW FOR SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC PROJECTS By Blakely Fernandez and Jane Macon Governmental enti ti es constantly struggle to address the competi ng demands of growing infrastructure needs, providing quality services and creati ng more economic growth opportuniti es, all while dealing with the reality of increased budget constraints. In the past decade, public-private partnerships (P-3s) have become a popular tool, at least in concept, to help governments balance these tensions. P-3s have been touted as the answer for infrastructure and services that governments don’t have the resources to address. But, any budget offi cer or other public offi cial who has looked closely at the private sector soluti ons knows that you never get something for nothing. The private sector might be willing to carry risk the public sector doesn’t want, or provide capital sooner than the public sector capacity allows, but these benefi ts come at a cost; and, someti mes, that cost is hard to measure. At the same ti me, there can be a real benefi t for early delivery of a project the public wants to see complete, and creati ng synergies with private development can build economic momentum, encouraging growth and investment beyond an initi al P-3. How then, does a public enti ty know when a P-3 is good deal? The fi rst and most important rule of thumb is that you can’t measure what you don’t understand.
    [Show full text]
  • Election 2016: Looking Ahead to a Trump Administration
    Election 2016: Looking Ahead to a Trump Administration November 17, 2016 2016 Election Results • Trump carried swing states (FL, IA, OH) as well as states that have traditionally voted blue in presidential races (PA, WI) • Michigan has 16 electoral votes, which will most likely go to Trump for 306 total • Popular Vote (as of 11/16/16): Clinton 47.6% / Trump 46.7%* *Source: USElectionAtlas.org Source: New York Times 2 “A Country Divided by Counties” • County results show Trump’s decisive gains were in rural areas in the rust belt/greater Appalachia 3 2016 Senate Results • Republican-Majority Senate • 48 Democrats / 51 Republicans • 1 seat yet to be called • Pence can vote on ties • Democrats gained 2 seats Source: New York Times, updated Nov. 14, 2016 4 2018 Senate Map • 33 Senate seats are up • 25 Democratically-held seats are up • Competitive seats: • North Dakota (Heidi Heitkamp) • Ohio (Sherrod Brown) • Wisconsin (Tammy Baldwin) • Indiana (Joe Donnelly) • Florida (Bill Nelson) • Missouri (Claire McCaskill) • Montana (Jon Tester) • New Jersey (Bob Menendez) • West Virginia (Joe Manchin) • Filibuster? Nuclear Option? 5 2016 House Results • Republican-Majority House • The Republican Party currently controls the House, with 246 seats, 28 more than the 218 needed for control • Final Results pending (4 seats yet to be called) • Democrats pick up ~7-8 seats Source: New York Times, updated Nov. 14, 2016 6 Trump’s Likely Cabinet Choices • White House Chief of Staff: Reince Priebus, the Chairman of the Republican National Committee • Strategic
    [Show full text]
  • Kaplan V. S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P. 12-CV-09350-U.S. District Court
    US District Court Civil Docket as of April 9, 2019 Retrieved from the court on April 9, 2019 U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:12-cv-09350-NRB-KNF Kaplan v. S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P. Date Filed: 12/21/2012 Assigned to: Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald Date Terminated: 05/12/2017 Referred to: Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox Jury Demand: Plaintiff Related Cases: 1:12-cv-08466-VM Nature of Suit: 850 1:13-cv-05181-VM Securities/Commodities Jurisdiction: Federal Question 1:13-cv-00149-VM Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act Lead Plaintiff David E. Kaplan represented by Deborah Clark-Weintraub Individually and on Behalf of All Others ScottScott LLP Similarly Situated 500 Fisfth Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10110 (212) 223-6444 Fax: (212) 223-6334 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED James Craig McCarroll Reed Smith LLP (NYC) 599 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212)-549-0209 Fax: (212)-521-5450 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jordan W. Siev Reed Smith LLP (NYC) 599 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 521-5400 Fax: (212) 521-5450 Email: [email protected] TERMINATED: 12/13/2016 LEAD ATTORNEY Christopher Chad Johnson Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan (NYC) 51 Madison Avenue 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 212-849-7000 Fax: 212-849-7100 Email: [email protected] TERMINATED: 09/22/2016 Emma Gilmore Pomerantz LLP 600 Third Ave, 20th Floor New York, NY 10016 (212) 661-1100 Fax: (212) 661-8665 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Ethan David Wohl Wohl & Fruchter LLP 570 Lexington Avenue, 16th Floor New York, NY 10022 (212) 758-4000 Fax: (212) 758-4004 Email: [email protected] ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Evan K.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyer Demographics Bracewell
    Bracewell LLP (www.bracewell.com) Basic Information Compensation & Benefits 1445 Ross Avenue, Ste. 3800 Recruiting Contact: 2016 compensation for entry-level lawyers ($/year) 160,000 Dallas, TX 75202-2711 Ms. Leigh Burns Summer Compensation Coordinator, Professional Resources Organization Size: 360 2016 compensation for Post-3Ls ($/week) 3,077 Office Size: 33 1445 Ross Avenue 2016 compensation for 2Ls ($/week) 3,077 Hiring Attorney: Suite 3800 2016 compensation for 1Ls($/week) 3,077 Mr. Jonathan Leatherberry Dallas, Texas (TX) 75202-2711 United States Phone: (214) 758-1027 Partnership & Advancement [email protected] Does the firm have two or more tiers of partner? Yes How many years is the non-equity track? How many years is the equity track? Lawyer Demographics Partner/Member Associates Counsel Non-traditional Track/Staff Summer Associates Attorneys Men 12 9 3 0 1 Women 1 4 2 0 1 Total 13 13 5 0 2 Latinx Men 0 1 1 0 0 Women 0 0 0 0 0 White Men 12 6 2 0 1 Women 1 4 2 0 1 Black or African American Men 0 2 0 0 0 Women 0 0 0 0 0 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Men 0 0 0 0 0 Islander Women 0 0 0 0 0 Asian Men 0 0 0 0 0 Women 0 0 0 0 0 Native American or Alaska Native Men 0 0 0 0 0 Women 0 0 0 0 0 2 or More Races Men 0 0 0 0 0 Women 0 0 0 0 0 Persons with Disabilities Men 0 0 0 0 0 Women 0 0 0 0 0 LGBTQ Men 0 0 0 0 0 Women 0 0 0 0 0 For more details, visit www.nalpdirectory.com NALP Copyright 2021 Bracewell LLP (www.bracewell.com) Pro Bono/Public Interest Is the pro bono information indicated here firm-wide or specific to one office?
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    1 Building better cities. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Annual Report 2016 2 Kinder Institute Founders Nancy & Rich Kinder KINDER INSTITUTE FOUNDERS NANCY & RICH KINDER n reviewing the accomplishments of the Kinder many parties involved as the primary source to under- Institute for Urban Research over the past year, it stand the issues and challenges facing our city as a result Iis clear the Institute has emerged as an important of the pension situation. force—and an honest broker—objectively capturing and We are grateful to Rice University for housing the analyzing urban issues in Houston. Kinder Institute and to Houston Endowment Inc. for The Kinder Institute released almost 20 reports last providing substantial support that has allowed the year. More important than the quantity, however, is the Kinder Institute to expand its scope and footprint in breadth and impact of the Institute’s work. Houston. We look forward to even greater accomplish- ments in 2017. In 2016, the Kinder Institute took on issues as diverse as urban education, housing and development, health in our neighborhoods, income disparity, building stronger Rich Kinder suburbs—and perhaps most significantly, the City of Advisory Board Chairman Houston’s pension crisis. Kinder Institute for Urban Research The Kinder Institute’s pension report, for example, Nancy Kinder framed the complex pension issue—articulately and im- Advisory Board President partially—and was used by the Houston Chronicle and the Kinder Institute for Urban Research Kinder Institute for Urban Research Kinder Institute Advisory Board 3 Advisory Board Members CHAIRMAN: John Mingé Rich Kinder, Kinder Morgan BP America, Inc. PRESIDENT: Nancy Kinder, Kinder Foundation Eric O.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Day Appendix.Pdf
    Climate change ...................................................................................................................... 11 Apparel Sector ................................................................................................................................ 11 GAP ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 Hanesbrands ...................................................................................................................................... 14 L Brands .............................................................................................................................................. 15 Nike .................................................................................................................................................... 16 PVH ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 VH ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 Banking & Finance Sector ............................................................................................................... 22 AIG ...................................................................................................................................................... 22 Bank of America ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bracewell LLP
    Bracewell LLP 2020 VAULT/MCCA LAW FIRM DIVERSITY SURVEY 711 Louisiana Street Suite 2300 Houston, TX 77002 Phone: 1-713-223-2300 Fax: 1-800-404-3970 www.bracewell.com LOCATIONS Houston (Headquarters), Austin, Connecticut, Dallas, Dubai, London, New York, San Antonio, Seattle, Washington, DC DIVERSITY LEADERSHIP Head(s) of Firm: Gregory M. Bopp, Managing Partner Diversity team leader(s): Yvonne Ho, Partner and Chair, Diversity & Inclusion Committee NUMBER OF ATTORNEYS TOTAL NUMBER OF ATTORNEYS Currently As of December 31, 2019 Worldwide 346 352 U.S. offices only 313 322 Response to Spring 2020 Vault/MCCA Law Firm Diversity Survey. Complete survey results available in Law Firm Diversity Database (http://mcca.vault.com). Copyright © 2020 Vault.com Inc. and Minority Corporate Counsel Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Bracewell LLP 2020 VAULT/MCCA LAW FIRM DIVERSITY SURVEY Law Firm Demographic Profile Does your firm have more than one tier of partnership? Yes ASSOCIATES (2019) SUMMER ASSOCIATES (2019) Men Women Men Women White/Caucasian 43 43 White/Caucasian 13 18 African-American/Black 3 2 African-American/Black 3 2 Hispanic/Latinx 2 6 Hispanic/Latinx 3 2 Alaska Native/American Indian 0 1 Alaska Native/American Indian 0 0 Asian 5 2 Asian 1 0 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0 0 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0 0 Multiracial 2 2 Multiracial 0 0 Openly LGBTQ 2 2 Openly LGBTQ 1 0 Individuals with Disabilities n/a n/a Individuals with Disabilities n/a n/a Total 55 56 Total 20 22 Note: Firm does not formally track data for individuals with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2009 • Vol
    43085-1 AlaBar:Layout 1 9/21/09 2:16 PM Page 313 SEPTEMBER 2009 • VOL. 70, NO. 5 2009-10 ASBASB PresidentPresident ThomasThomas J.J. MethvinMethvin andand FamilyFamily CelebrateCelebrate ProPro BonoBono WeekWeek OctoberOctober 25-31,25-31, 20092009 43085-1 AlaBar:Layout 1 9/21/09 2:16 PM Page 314 43085-1 AlaBar:Layout 1 9/22/09 2:51 PM Page 315 43085-1 AlaBar:Layout 1 9/21/09 2:16 PM Page 316 43085-1 AlaBar:Layout 1 9/21/09 2:16 PM Page 317 On the SEPTEMBER 2009 • VOL. 70, NO. 5 Cover In This Issue ASB President Thomas J. Methvin and family—Pictured are Amy and Tom Methvin, center, and their two sons, 334 ASB Spring 2009 Admittees Rucker, left, and Slade, right. Tom and Amy met when he was in law ASB LEADERSHIP FORUM: school at Cumberland and have been 338 Update and General Selection Criteria married for over 18 years. Their children By Sam David Knight attend St. James School in Montgomery, 340 where Rucker is in the 11th grade and on Class 5 Graduates the basketball team, and 8th-grader Slade 341 A Perspective on the ASB’s 2009 Leadership Forum–Class 5 is on the football and basketball teams. By Lisa Darnley Cooper –Photo by Kenneth Boone Photography 344 2009 ASB Annual Meeting Awards and Highlights 350 Celebrate Alabama’s Pro Bono Week Departments By Phil D. Mitchell 319 President’s Page Access to Justice– 352 Alabama Law Foundation Announces Now More than Ever Kids’ Chance Scholarship Recipients 321 Executive 353 State Bar LRS Offers Discounts to Military Personnel Director’s Report Rendering Service to Those 354 Outside the Courtroom and Inside the Classroom: from Another Continent Career Attorney Discovers Joy of Teaching 325 Memorials By Kimberly L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Speed in International Child Abduction Cases Page 48 SAVE the DATE
    Volume 67, Issue 5 The Need for Speed in International Child Abduction Cases page 48 SAVE THE DATE Annual Meeting & Convention September 23–25, 2021 HILTON MIAMI DOWNTOWN – MIAMI, FL Volume 67, Issue 5 EDITORIAL BOARD Editor in Chief Andrew Doyle [email protected] Immediate Past Editor in Chief Rachel Hughey [email protected] September/October 2020: Voting Law Associate Editor James W. Satola [email protected] Managing Editor Lynne G. Agoston (240) 404-6488 [email protected] Book Review Editor Caroline Johnson Levine Judicial Profile Editors Heaven Chee Hon. Noelle C. Collins Hon. Karoline Mehalchick Articles Editors Joanna Fox Sheila Hollis Christopher Lucca Bruce McKenna Anne Perry Dalmacio Posadas Elizabeth Turnbull Susan Yorke Columns Editor Arturo Bauermeister Senior Proof Editor SAVE THE DATE Hon. Donna Phillips Currault Proof Editors Sarika J. Angulo Ira Cohen Mary Hope Forsyth Peter M. Mansfield Soledad M. Valenciano 28 A Lawyer’s Deployment 48 The Need for Speed in The Federal Lawyer (ISSN: 1080-675X) to the Front Lines of the U.S.- International Child Abduction is published bimonthly six times per year Mexico Border by the Federal Bar Association, 1220 N. Cases Fillmore St., Ste. 444, Arlington, VA, 22201 Tel, (571) 481-9126, Fax (571) By Major Miguel R. Acosta By Robert E. Rains 481-9090, Email: [email protected]. Sub- scription Rates: $14 of each member’s dues is applied toward a subscription. Nonmember domestic subscriptions are 34 Agricultural Migrant The Coming Wave of $50 each per year; foreign subscriptions 54 are $60 each per year. All subscription Workers in Today’s America: prices include postage.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Brochure
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF LAW THE CORPORATE COUNSEL SECTION OF THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS 40TH ANNUAL CORPORATE COUNSEL INSTITUTE May 17–18, 2018 DoubleTree by Hilton Dallas Near the Galleria ■ Dallas, Texas LIVE WEBCAST May 17–18, 2018 SPONSORS Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Holland & Knight LLP Alexander Dubose Jefferson and Townsend LLP Langley & Banack, Inc. Beck Redden LLP Littler Mendelson P.C. Bracewell LLP Thompson & Knight LLP Earn up to 14.00 Hours of Credit, Including 2.75 Hours of Ethics Credit (Approved in TX, CA, and OK; Expected in LA). Earn up to 16.80 Hours of Texas Accounting CPE Credit www.utcle.org ■ 512.475.6700 40TH ANNUAL CORPORATE COUNSEL INSTITUTE May 17–18, 2018 ■ DoubleTree by Hilton Dallas Near the Galleria ■ Dallas, Texas Earn up to 14.00 Hours of Credit, Including 2.75 Hours of Ethics Credit (Approved in TX, CA, and OK; Expected in LA). Earn up to 16.80 Hours of Texas Accounting CPE Credit THURSDAY MORNING, MAY 17, 2018 10:45 a.m. 1.00 hr 1:35 p.m. .50 hr Shareholder Activism and Hostile Activity Presiding Officer: Drafting Contract Clauses That Actually Help Study the state-of-the-art tactics for activist defense, Sylvia Ann Cardona, Langley & if Litigation Arises Banack, Inc., San Antonio, TX "Tried and true clauses" and boilerplate language raid preparedness, board/corporate governance, can create a false sense of comfort and lead to and shareholder engagement. Practical “lessons adverse results in litigation if not periodically learned” from high profile defense situations 7:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report ANNUAL REPORT KIND 2018 ANNUAL Table of Contents Letter from Board Chair Brad Smith 4 Voices That Matter Most 20
    2018WWW.SUPPORTKIND.ORG Annual Report ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL KIND 2018 Table of Contents Letter from Board Chair Brad Smith 4 Voices That Matter Most 20 KIND Facts 5 Central America and Mexico Programs 22 Partnerships 6 European Initiative and Kids in Need of Defense UK 25 KIND’s Ongoing Response to Family Separation 8 Coming Together for Children Alone 27 Holistic Services Through Trauma- Providing Technology Solutions 30 Informed Care 12 Leadership 31 KIND in the Media 13 2018 Donors 34 Donor Support 14 2018 Financials 37 Robust Advocacy to Preserve Vital Protections 18 Partners 38 KIND VisionKIND’s and Vision: AMission world in which children’s rights and well-being are protected as they migrate alone in search of safety. KIND’s Mission: KIND 2018 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL Ensuring that no child appears in immigration court without high quality legal representation. Advancing laws, policies, and practices that ensure children’s protection and uphold their right to due process and fundamental fairness. Promoting in countries of origin, transit, and destination durable solutions to child migration that are grounded in the best interests of the child and ensure that no child is forced to involuntarily migrate. 3 2019 Barra, (C) Lori from Letter Board Chair Brad Smith KIND celebrated its 10th anniversary in 2018 – a decade of changing the lives of unaccompanied immigrant and refugee children, giving them hope, safety, and a chance to fulfill their dreams. Our accomplishments have surpassed our wildest dreams – more than 18,000 children referred, 41,000 attorneys, paralegals, and law students trained, and partnerships with over 600 law firms and corporations.
    [Show full text]
  • 12Texjoilgasenergyl41.Pdf (3.009Mb)
    EVERYTHING UNDER THE SUN: A GUIDE TO SITING SOLAR IN THE LONE STAR STATE ERNEST E. SMITH,* JACOB R. LEDERLE* AND W. JARED BERG*** I. INTRODUCTION.................................................42 II. STAGES OF SOLAR DEVELOPMENT .............................. 45 A. Feasibility....................................46 B. Financing and Tax Incentives............. ......... 48 i. Federal Incentives............................49 ii. State Incentives ...................................... 51 iii. Utilizing Tax Incentives - Tax Equity and Investment Structures .................................. 52 iv. Practical Notes .............................. 53 C. Siting and Leasing ..................... ............. 54 i. The Solar Lease .................... ............... 56 1. Duration ........................ 56 2. Rights...................................58 WHEREi. TO SITE AND THE IMPLICATIONS........................ 59 A. Competing Surface Use ................................. 59 i. Oil & Gas Development ................... .... 59 1. Unsevered (and Unleased) Minerals ...... ....... 60 2. Severed (but Unleased) Minerals ............... 60 3. Leased Minerals. ................... ......... 66 4. Minerals Subject to the Relinquishment Act.............68 Ernest Smith is a Professor of Law and the Rex G. Baker Centennial Chair in Natural Resources Law at The University of Texas School of Law; he is also the co-author of the Texas Law of Oil & Gas treatise. Professor Smith is also a faculty advisor to the TEXAS JOURNAL OF OIL, GAS, AND ENERGY LAW. " Jake Lederle is an associate attorney with Wetsel, Carmichael, & Allen in Sweetwater, Texas. He would like to thank his co-authors and especially Professor Ernest Smith whose insight, expertise, and guidance made this paper possible. He would also like to thank the staff of the TEXAS JOURNAL OF OIL, GAS, & ENERGY LAW for all of their hard work. Finally, he would like to thank his former professor and mentor, the original Texas wind lawyer, Rod Wetsel, whose contributions cannot be overstated. ** W.
    [Show full text]