DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk Faculty of Engineering and the Environment Computer simulation studies of complex magnetic materials by Weiwei Wang Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisors: Prof. Hans Fangohr, Dr. Ian Hawke October 2015 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND THE ENVIRONMENT Doctor of Philosophy COMPUTER SIMULATION STUDIES OF COMPLEX MAGNETIC MATERIALS by Weiwei Wang With the development of both computing power and software engineering, computer simulation of the micromagnetic model or atomistic spin model, has become an impor- tant tool for studying a wide range of different complex phenomena in magnetic ma- terials. Meanwhile, the rapid improvement of advanced measurement techniques has allowed the probing of ultrafast magnetization dynamics, as well as the magnetic phe- nomena involving charge current, heat and light. The simulation of magnetism is now moving towards a multiphysics method. Therefore, fast, user-friendly, and extensible codes with accurate algorithms are helpful in understanding the physics and designing novel magnetic devices on the nanoscale. In the preparation of this thesis we have developed Fidimag, which is a Python/C sim- ulation tool supporting both micromagnetic and atomistic spin models. The software has also been extended to support the Landau-Lifshitz-Baryakhtar (LLBar) equation. Using Fidimag, we have performed simulations to study the domain-wall motion and spin-wave decay with the LLBar equation. We also explain the exchange damping in the LLBar equation as the phenomenological nonlocal damping by linking it to spin pump- ing, therefore, LLBar equation can be considered as a phenomenological equation of the nonlocal damping. We studied magnon-induced domain-wall motion in the presence of Dzyaloshinskii- Moriya interaction (DMI) numerically and theoretically. We find that the presence of DMI and easy-plane anisotropy can drive the domain wall very effectively and that the domain-wall velocity depends on the sign of DMI constant. While the negative velocity is considered as a result of angular momentum conservation, we attribute this fast domain-wall motion to linear momentum transfer between magnons and the domain wall. By numerically solving the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation with a classical spin model on a two-dimensional system, we show that both magnetic skyrmions and skyrmion lattices can be moved with microwave magnetic fields. The mechanism is enabled by breaking the axial symmetry of the skyrmion with a static in-plane external field. Contents Declaration of Authorship xi List of publications xii Acknowledgements xiii 1 Introduction1 1.1 Background...................................1 1.2 Structure of this thesis.............................4 2 Micromagnetic and Atomistic modeling5 2.1 Magnetic moments...............................6 2.2 Equation of Motion...............................6 2.3 Interactions...................................7 2.3.1 Exchange interaction..........................8 2.3.2 Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI)..............8 2.3.3 Dipolar interaction........................... 10 2.3.4 Anisotropy................................ 10 2.3.5 Zeeman energy............................. 11 2.4 Atomistic spin model.............................. 11 2.5 Micromagnetics................................. 13 2.5.1 Exchange energy............................ 14 2.5.2 Magnetostatic energy......................... 14 2.5.3 Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Energy.................... 15 2.6 Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation................... 16 2.6.1 Spherical form of LLG equation.................... 17 2.6.2 Spin transfer torque.......................... 18 2.6.3 Nonlocal spin transfer torque..................... 19 2.7 Finmag and Fidimag.............................. 20 3 Fidimag 21 3.1 Introduction................................... 21 3.2 Fast Summation of Dipolar interactions................... 22 3.2.1 Fast Summation............................. 23 3.2.2 Dipolar interaction in triangular lattice............... 23 3.3 Landau-Lifshitz-Baryakhtar equation.................... 24 3.4 Eigenvalue Method............................... 25 3.5 Verification I................................... 27 v vi CONTENTS 3.5.1 A magnetic moment under an external magnetic field....... 27 3.5.2 Domain-wall motion under charge currents............. 27 3.5.3 Magnetic skyrmions.......................... 30 3.5.4 Normal modes of a spin chain.................... 32 3.6 Stochastic LLG equation............................ 34 3.7 Verification II.................................. 35 3.7.1 A magnetic moment.......................... 35 3.7.2 Equilibrium distribution of a nanoparticle............. 36 3.7.3 Magnon temperature.......................... 36 4 Phenomenological description of nonlocal damping 39 4.1 Introduction................................... 39 4.2 Basic equations................................. 41 4.3 Spin-wave decay................................. 45 4.4 Domain-wall motion.............................. 48 4.4.1 Parallel relaxation............................ 51 4.4.2 Nonlocal damping........................... 53 4.5 Ferromagnetic resonance (FMR)........................ 54 4.6 Summary..................................... 56 5 Magnon-driven domain-wall motion with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction 57 5.1 Introduction................................... 57 5.2 The system.................................... 58 5.3 Domain-wall profile and Spin-wave excitation............... 59 5.4 Domain-wall motion.............................. 61 5.5 Two types of domain walls........................... 65 5.6 Summary..................................... 67 6 Driving magnetic skyrmions with microwave fields 69 6.1 Introduction................................... 69 6.2 The system and asymmetric skyrmions................... 70 6.3 Spin waves modes................................ 72 6.4 Skyrmion motion................................ 73 6.5 Summary..................................... 77 7 Conclusion and Outlook 79 7.1 Conclusion.................................... 79 7.2 Outlook...................................... 80 A 81 A.1 Section A..................................... 81 A.2 Section B..................................... 82 A.3 Section C..................................... 82 A.4 Section D..................................... 83 B Using discontinuous Galerkin Methods 85 B.1 Introduction................................... 85 B.2 Laplace operator using CG method...................... 85 CONTENTS vii B.3 Background................................... 86 B.3.1 H(div) space............................... 86 B.3.2 BDM space............................... 87 B.3.3 Piola mapping.............................. 87 B.4 Using BDM space................................ 88 B.5 MFMFE...................................... 89 B.6 A Test....................................... 89 C Treecode for Boundary Element Method 91 C.1 General problem................................ 91 C.2 Treecode..................................... 91 C.2.0.1 Particle-cluster interactions................. 92 C.2.0.2 Recurrence relations of Taylor coefficients........ 93 C.2.0.3 Implementation of Treecode................ 94 C.2.1 Combine Treecode with FEM/BEM................. 95 C.3 Numerical Tests................................. 96 C.4 Improvement.................................. 97 C.5 Summary..................................... 99 Bibliography 101 List of Figures 2.1 Three heat reservoirs (spin, lattice and electron) model........... 11 3.1 Structure of Fidimag............................... 21 3.2 Triangular lattice embedded in rectangular mesh.............. 24 3.3 The procession motion of a magnetic moment................ 28 3.4 Domain-wall motion driven by spin transfer torque............. 29 3.5 Two types of skymrions............................. 30 3.6 Belavin-Polyakov skyrmion........................... 32 3.7 Normal modes of a spin chain......................... 33 3.8 Average magnetization of a magnetic moment................ 35 3.9 Equilibrium distribution of a nanoparticle.................. 36 3.10 Equilibrium magnetization of a spin chain.................. 37 4.1 The spin-wave amplitude decay along a rod................. 46 4.2 Frequency-dependent spin-wave decay.................... 47 4.3 Domain-wall velocities with different susceptibilities............ 49 4.4 Magnetization length difference of a domain wall.............. 50 4.5 Domain-wall velocities for different exchange dampings.......... 53 4.6 Dynamic susceptibility of an elliptical-shaped nanomagnet........ 55 4.7 Fitted damping from dynamic susceptibility................. 55 5.1 Domain-wall profile in the presence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antiferromagnetic Spin Waves in a Magnetic-Field Gradient
    Opleiding Natuur- en Sterrenkunde Antiferromagnetic spin waves in a magnetic-field gradient Bachelor Thesis R. Wakelkamp Supervisors: Prof. Dr. R.A. Duine Institute for Theoretical Physics M.Sc. C.E. Ulloa Osorio Institute for Theoretical Physics June 12, 2020 Abstract Recent studies have shown that high levels of ferritin, a type of protein that is found in the brain, could be an indicator of Alzheimer's disease. Therefore it is important to be able to map ferritin in the brain. We hypothesize that this mapping can be done by exciting the spins in ferritin in a way that is similar to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). However, unlike the nuclear spins that are excited in NMR, the spins in ferritin are highly coupled due to exchange interactions. We use a one-dimensional antiferromagnetic chain of spins as a model for ferritin. With this model we determine if the application of a linear magnetic-field gradient to such an ensemble of spins results in spin-wave excitations that could be used to image ferritin in the brain. For this purpose, the excitations must be sharply localised in the chain and they should have a distinct frequency. Although we found that there exist excitations that are more narrowly localised due to the magnetic-field gradient, this effect is not found for the large majority of excitations. We also found that the magnetic-field gradient shifts all frequencies up or down by roughly a constant value, meaning the excitations also do not have a distinct frequency. We therefore conclude that this setup is most likely not useful for imaging ferritin.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnonics Vs. Ferronics
    Magnonics vs. Ferronics Gerrit E.W. Bauera,b,c,d, Ping Tanga, Ryo Iguchie, Ken-ichi Uchidae,b,c aWPI-AIMR, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, 980-8577 Sendai, Japan bIMR, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, 980-8577 Sendai, Japan cCenter for Spintronics Research Network, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan dZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands eNational Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305-0047, Japan Abstract Magnons are the elementary excitations of the magnetic order that carry spin, momentum, and energy. Here we compare the magnon with the ferron, i.e. the elementary excitation of the electric dipolar order, that transports polarization and heat in ferroelectrics. 1. Introduction Much of condensed matter physics addresses weak excitations of materials and devices from their ground states. More often than not the complications caused by electron correlations can be captured by the concept of approximately 5 non-interacting quasi-particles with well-defined dispersion relations. Quasi- particles are not eigenstates and eventually decay on characteristic time scales that depend on material and environment. In conventional electric insulators, the lowest energy excitations are lattice waves with associated bosonic quasi- particles called phonons. The elementary excitations of magnetic order are spin 10 waves and their bosonic quasi-particles are the \magnons" [1]. In magnetic insulators, magnons and phonons coexist in the same phase space and can form hybrid quasi-particles that may be called \magnon polarons". Yttrium iron arXiv:2106.12775v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 24 Jun 2021 garnet (YIG) is the material of choice to study magnons, phonons, and magnon polarons because of their longevity in YIG bulk and thin-film single crystals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Wave
    editorial The next wave Spin waves look poised to make a splash in data processing. Even before its discovery in 1897, control of appropriate materials, and the need of the electron had already played a role in for advanced nanoscience techniques to a technological revolution: electric power generate, manipulate and detect magnons enabled the mass-production manufacturing on the nanometre scale. But recent methods of the second industrial revolution demonstrations, such as the realization of in the nineteenth century. Levels of its a magnon transistor, highlight the progress manipulation have now reached such highs being made. that the technologies that pervade our daily To expand the set of materials capable lives would surely seem fanciful to the of hosting magnons, artificial crystals are scientists who first probed this elementary being used. In much the same way that particle. Now the world looks set to welcome photonic crystals exhibit tailored band a new way of exploiting the electron, in the structures for electromagnetic waves, form of magnonics. certain magnonic crystals can modify the The electron charge is firmly established band structure for magnons. Modulation is as the information carrier of choice for achieved in such crystals by varying their modern technologies. But what of its second magnetic properties On page 487 of this elementary property, spin? Despite being issue, Marc Vogel and colleagues show how discovered just ten years after the electron reconfigurable magnonic crystals can be charge was first measured, spin remains a created in an insulating ferrimagnet using relative passenger in information-processing all-optical methods. technologies. But its presence could The potential for using such techniques revolutionize these technologies, and in more in wireless communication technologies ways than one.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetism 2021
    Abstract Book ONLINE EVENT Lorem ipsum Magnetism 2021 12-13 April 2021 magnetism2021.iopconfs.org Contents Plenary 2 Wohlfarth lecture 3 Public lecture 3 Talk from NPG 3 Topical materials for spintronics 4 Theory and computational magnetism 1 6 Thin films and nanomagnetism 1 10 Correlated electron systems 13 Magnetization dynamics and damping 15 2D and carbon-based materials 17 Antiferromagnet spin dynamics 19 General topics in magnetism 20 Thin films and nanomagnetism 2 24 Theory and computational magnetism 2 27 Spintronics 29 Thin films and nanomagnetism 3 34 Poster session 1 38 Poster session 2 58 Poster session 3 78 1 Plenary Magnetic Weyl Semimetals! Claudia Felser1, Kaustuv Manna1, Enke Lui1, and Yan Sun1 1Max Planck Institute Chemical Physics of Solids, Dresden, Germany transdisciplinary topic in condensed matter physics, solid state chemistry and materials science. All 200 000 inorganic materials were recently classified into trivial and topological materials: topological insulators, Dirac, Weyl and nodal-line semimetals, and topological metals [1]. Around 20% of all materials host topological bands. Currently, we have focussed also on magnetic materials, a fertile field for new since all crossings in the band structure of ferromagnets are Weyl nodes or nodal lines [2], as for example Co2MnGa and Co3Sn2S2. Beyond a single particle picture we identified recently antiferromagnetic topological materials [3]. [1] Bradlyn et al., Nature 547 298, (2017), Vergniory, et al., Nature 566 480 (2019). [2] Belopolski, et al., Science 365, 1278 (2019), Liu, et al. Nature Physics 14, 1125 (2018), Guin, et al. Advanced Materials 31 (2019) 1806622, Liu, et al., Science 365, 1282 (2019), Morali, et al., Science 365, 1286 (2019) [3] Xu et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Coherent Time Control to Cavity Magnon-Polariton Modes
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-019-0266-x OPEN Introducing coherent time control to cavity magnon-polariton modes Tim Wolz 1*, Alexander Stehli1, Andre Schneider 1, Isabella Boventer1,2, Rair Macêdo 3, Alexey V. Ustinov1,4, Mathias Kläui 2 & Martin Weides 1,3* 1234567890():,; By connecting light to magnetism, cavity magnon-polaritons (CMPs) can link quantum computation to spintronics. Consequently, CMP-based information processing devices have emerged over the last years, but have almost exclusively been investigated with single-tone spectroscopy. However, universal computing applications will require a dynamic and on- demand control of the CMP within nanoseconds. Here, we perform fast manipulations of the different CMP modes with independent but coherent pulses to the cavity and magnon sys- tem. We change the state of the CMP from the energy exchanging beat mode to its normal modes and further demonstrate two fundamental examples of coherent manipulation. We first evidence dynamic control over the appearance of magnon-Rabi oscillations, i.e., energy exchange, and second, energy extraction by applying an anti-phase drive to the magnon. Our results show a promising approach to control building blocks valuable for a quantum internet and pave the way for future magnon-based quantum computing research. 1 Institute of Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany. 2 Institute of Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany. 3 James Watt School of Engineering, Electronics & Nanoscale Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Doc Position on “Spintronics and Magnonics Phenomena in Systems with Antiferromagnetic Coupling”
    Post-Doc Position on “Spintronics and Magnonics phenomena in systems with antiferromagnetic coupling” The research group on simulation of magnetic nanostructures of the University of Salamanca (SINAMAG: https://diarium.usal.es/sinamag/) conducts theoretical research in the field magnetization dynamics at the nanoscale. The recent proposal of using antiferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic materials at the nanoscale has opened new routes to explore and develop faster and efficient magnetic devices. In particular, the control of the magnetic state in these systems under either spin current and/or strain are nowadays key research subjects from both fundamental and technological points of view. SINAMAG invites applications for a 2-year Post-Doc position to explore theoretically these new scenarios. The position is part of the project “Spintronics and Magnonics phenomena in systems with antoiferromagnetic coupling” (Reference SA114P20), supervised by Dr. Eduardo Martínez ([email protected]), and funded by Junta de Castilla y León and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional. Job Profile Successful candidates will join the SINAMAG group at Salamanca (Spain), and will have the possibility to consolidate their own independent research lines and to promote collaborative research among the following research lines: - Development of theoretical and numerical models to study and control the magnetization dynamics under spin currents and strain. - Perform of numerical simulations of the current-driven magnetization dynamics in ferrimagnetic-based multilayers, including magnetic switching, domain wall motion and skyrmions dynamics. - Evaluate the mechanical response by numerical simulations of hybrid piezo-electric and magnetic systems by using COMSOL Multiphysics, and to develop the home-made micromagnetic code to analyze its influence on different magnetization processes including magnetic switching, domain wall motion and excitation and propagation of spin waves among others.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling Spins with Surface Magnon Polaritons Jamison Sloan
    Controlling spins with surface magnon polaritons by Jamison Sloan B.S. Physics Massachussetts Institute of Technology (2017) Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2020 ○c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2020. All rights reserved. Author............................................................. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science May 13, 2020 Certified by . Marin Soljaciˇ c´ Professor of Physics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by. Leslie A. Kolodziejski Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Chair, Department Committee on Graduate Students 2 Controlling spins with surface magnon polaritons by Jamison Sloan Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science on May 13, 2020, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Abstract Polaritons in metals, semimetals, semiconductors, and polar insulators can allow for ex- treme confinement of electromagnetic energy, providing many promising opportunities for enhancing typically weak light-matter interactions such as multipolar radiation, multipho- ton spontaneous emission, Raman scattering, and material nonlinearities. These extremely confined polaritons are quasi-electrostatic in nature, with most of their energy residing in the electric field. As a result, these "electric" polaritons are far from optimized for en- hancing emission of a magnetic nature, such as spin relaxation, which is typically many orders of magnitude slower than corresponding electric decays. Here, we take concepts of “electric” polaritons into magnetic materials, and propose using surface magnon polaritons in negative magnetic permeability materials to strongly enhance spin-relaxation in nearby emitters.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 High Frequency Permeability of Magnonic Metamaterials
    High frequency permeability of magnonic metamaterials with magnetic inclusions of complex shape O. Dmytriiev1,6,a, M. Dvornik1, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy1, M. Franchin2, H. Fangohr2, L. Giovannini3, F. Montoncello3, D. V. Berkov4, E. K. Semenova4, N. L. Gorn4, A. Prabhakar5, and V. V. Kruglyak1,b 1. School of Physics, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QL, United Kingdom 2. School of Engineering Sciences, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom 3. Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Ferrara, Via G. Saragat 1, 44122 Ferrara, Italy 4. Innovent Technology Development, Pruessingstrasse, 27B, D-07745, Jena, Germany 5. Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India 6. Institute of Magnetism, Kiev, 03142, Ukraine Abstract We present a method of calculation of the effective magnetic permeability of magnonic metamaterials containing periodically arranged magnetic inclusions of arbitrary shapes. The spectrum of spin wave modes confined in the inclusions is fully taken into account. Within the scope of the proposed method, we compare two approaches. The first approach is based on a simple semi-analytical theory that uses the numerically calculated susceptibility tensor of an isolated inclusion as input data. Within the second approach, micromagnetic packages with periodic boundary conditions (PBC) are used to calculate the susceptibility of a single 2D periodic array of such inclusions, with the whole 3D metamaterial consisting of a stack of such arrays. To calculate the susceptibility tensor of an isolated inclusion, we have implemented and compared two different methods: (a) a micromagnetic method, in which we have employed three different micromagnetic packages: the finite element package NMAG and the two finite differences packages OOMMF and MicroMagus; and (b) the modified dynamical matrix method.
    [Show full text]
  • Current-Controlled Nanomagnetic Writing for Reconfigurable Magnonic
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-020-00487-y OPEN Current-controlled nanomagnetic writing for reconfigurable magnonic crystals ✉ Jack C. Gartside 1,4 , Son G. Jung 1,3,4, Seung Y. Yoo 1,4, Daan M. Arroo 2, Alex Vanstone1, Troy Dion1,2, Kilian D. Stenning 1 & Will R. Branford 1 1234567890():,; Strongly-interacting nanomagnetic arrays are crucial across an ever-growing suite of tech- nologies. Spanning neuromorphic computing, control over superconducting vortices and reconfigurable magnonics, the utility and appeal of these arrays lies in their vast range of distinct, stable magnetization states. Different states exhibit different functional behaviours, making precise, reconfigurable state control an essential cornerstone of such systems. However, few existing methodologies may reverse an arbitrary array element, and even fewer may do so under electrical control, vital for device integration. We demonstrate selective, reconfigurable magnetic reversal of ferromagnetic nanoislands via current-driven motion of a transverse domain wall in an adjacent nanowire. The reversal technique operates under all- electrical control with no reliance on external magnetic fields, rendering it highly suitable for device integration across a host of magnonic, spintronic and neuromorphic logic archi- tectures. Here, the reversal technique is leveraged to realize two fully solid-state reconfi- gurable magnonic crystals, offering magnonic gating, filtering, transistor-like switching and peak-shifting without reliance on global magnetic fields. 1 Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 2 London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London WC1H 0AH, UK. 3 Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK. 4These authors contributed equally: Jack C. Gartside, Son G.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I Magnonic Modes in Nanomagnets, Chaotic and Coherent Magnonic States 1 Spin-Wave Eigen-Modes in a Normally Magnetized Nano-Pillar
    Contents Part I Magnonic Modes in Nanomagnets, Chaotic and Coherent Magnonic States 1 Spin-Wave Eigen-modes in a Normally Magnetized Nano-pillar ... 3 V.V. Naletov, G. de Loubens, S. Borlenghi, and O. Klein 1.1 Introduction ............................. 3 1.2 Identification of the Spin-Wave Modes ............... 5 1.2.1 Single Magnetic Disk . ................... 6 1.2.2 Double Magnetic Disks ................... 7 1.2.3 Micromagnetic Simulations vs. Mechanical-FMR Experiments ......................... 9 1.3 Conclusion . ............................. 14 References ................................. 14 2 Bottom up Magnonics: Magnetization Dynamics of Individual Nanomagnets ............................... 17 P.S. Keatley, P. Gangmei, M. Dvornik, R.J. Hicken, J. Grollier, C. Ulysse, J.R. Childress, and J.A. Katine 2.1 Introduction ............................. 17 2.2 Experimental Methods and Sample Details ............. 18 2.3ResultsandDiscussion....................... 20 2.4Summary............................... 27 References ................................. 27 3 Features of Chaotic Spin Waves in Magnetic Film Feedback Rings .29 Aaron M. Hagerstrom and Mingzhong Wu 3.1 Introduction ............................. 29 3.2 Experiments ............................. 30 3.3 Frequency- and Time-Domain Signals ............... 32 3.4 Ambiguity Functions ........................ 32 3.5 Tuning of Ambiguity Function Properties via Ring Gain ...... 33 3.6 Effects of Signal Duration on Ambiguity Function ......... 35 xi xii Contents 3.7 Cross Ambiguity Function
    [Show full text]
  • Landau-Lifshitz Magnetodynamics As a Hamilton Model: Magnons in an Instanton Background
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B 82, 024410 ͑2010͒ Landau-Lifshitz magnetodynamics as a Hamilton model: Magnons in an instanton background Igor V. Ovchinnikov* and Kang L. Wang† Department of Electrical Engineering, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1594, USA ͑Received 22 March 2010; revised manuscript received 12 May 2010; published 13 July 2010͒ To take full advantage of the well-developed field-theoretic methods, Magnonics needs a yet-existing La- grangian formulation. Here, we show that Landau-Lifshitz magnetodynamics is a member of the covariant- Schrödinger-equation family of Hamilton models and apply the covariant background method arriving at the Ginzburg-Landau Lagrangian formalism for magnons in an instanton background. Magnons appear to be nonrelativistic spinless bosons, which feel instantons as a gauge field and as a Bose condensate. Among the examples of the usefulness of the proposition is the recognition of the instanton-induced phase shifts in magnons as the Berry phase and the interpretation of the spin-transfer-torque generation as a ferromagnetic counterpart of the Josephson supercurrent. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.024410 PACS number͑s͒: 75.10.Ϫb, 75.30.Ds, 75.60.Ch I. INTRODUCTION LF deals with the problem of magnon spectrum in a non- trivial instanton background ͑Sec. IV C͒; discuss the enabled Nanometer-scale magnetization is believed to be one of dynamical diagrammatic technique ͑Sec. IV D͒, which can the most promising fabrics for the computational platforms take a detailed account of the geometrical nonlinearities, of the future. As long as the essence of computations is in the which, in turn, are dominant for magnons as we show by manipulation of the ͑nonlinear͒ correlations, it is the stable considering the three-magnon scattering10 in Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Spin-Orbit-Torque Magnonics
    Spin-orbit-torque magnonics 1* 2 3 3 1 V. E. Demidov, S. Urazhdin, A. Anane, V. Cros, S. O. Demokritov 1Institute for Applied Physics and Center for Nanotechnology, University of Muenster, Corrensstrasse 2-4, 48149 Muenster, Germany 2Department of Physics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA 3Unité Mixte de Physique, CNRS, Thales, Université Paris-Saclay, 91767, Palaiseau, France The field of magnonics, which utilizes propagating spin waves for nano-scale transmission and processing of information, has been significantly advanced by the advent of the spin-orbit torque. The latter phenomenon can allow one to overcome two main drawbacks of magnonic devices – low energy efficiency of conversion of electrical signals into spin wave signals, and fast spatial decay of spin waves in thin-film waveguiding structures. At first glance, the excitation and amplification of spin waves by spin-orbit torques can seem to be straightforward. Recent research indicates, however, that the lack of the mode-selectivity in the interaction of spin currents with dynamic magnetic modes and the onset of dynamic nonlinear phenomena represent significant obstacles. Here, we discuss the possible route to overcoming these limitations, based on the suppression of nonlinear spin-wave interactions in magnetic systems with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. We show that this approach enables efficient excitation of coherent magnetization dynamics and propagating spin waves in extended spatial regions, and is expected to enable practical implementation of complete compensation
    [Show full text]