3 Linden, a Neolithic Activity Area in the Core Region Grave-Cuyk

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3 Linden, a Neolithic Activity Area in the Core Region Grave-Cuyk Times fade away. The neolithization of the southern Netherlands Verhart, L.B.M. Citation Verhart, L. B. M. (1999, June 2). Times fade away. The neolithization of the southern Netherlands. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13346 Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional License: Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13346 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). 3 Linden, a Neolithic activity area in the core region Grave-Cuyk. 3.1 Introduction This chapter deals with the core region Grave-Cuyk (fig. 3.1). It is a study of a regional distribution pattern of sites in relation to the investigation of a single site. The analysis of the settlement pattern using a.o. GIS is outside our scope. This analysis will be published elsewhere1. 3.2 The Middle Neolithic in the south of the Netherlands In 1973 the term ‘Middle Neolithic of Limburg’ was first introduced as a result of the Koningsbosch investigation2. This denoted chronologically the period between the Early Neolithic Bandkeramik and the Late Neolithic beaker- cultures. Culturally this Middle Neolithic encompasses the Michelsberg(MK)-culture (Middle Neolithic A) and the Wartberg/Stein/Vlaardingen(WSV)-complex3 (Middle Neolithic B). In this outline the emphasis will be on the MK-phase and less attention will be paid to the WSV-phase. The Middle Neolithic can in a material sense be recognized in the Meuse valley by the — rare — occurrence of mostly undecorated pottery with few typical features and large flint concentrations, both in number and in size. The sites usually palimpsests represent an accumulation of moments of use, not only from the Middle Neolithic, but often as early as the Macro region Mesolithic and as late as the Iron Age. The limited typological differences make it hard to distinguish pottery Core region and flint by period. Another remarkable phenomenon is the large number of sites dating from the Middle Neolithic. The origins of the MK-culture lie in the German Lower Rhine area. There a gradual typological development in the pottery can be discerned from Rössen to MK I and subse- quently MK II4. Lüning assumed that not until phase MK III an expansion towards the north and west occurred5. This idea has been superseded by the occurrence of MK II-pottery outside this supposed centre, even as far as the Paris Basin6. 0 20 km As a result of recent research in the Limburg Meuse valley itself, but particularly in the adjoining areas like the west of Fig. 3.1 The macroregion and location of the core region Grave-Cuyk the Netherlands, West Germany and Belgium, the early indicated with a black line. phase of the Middle Neolithic, the period of the MK-culture, can be described more accurately7. In the south of the Netherlands Maastricht-Vogelzang8 and the recently discovered causewayed enclosure in Heerlen9 141 Fig. 3.2 Guide artefacts for the Middle Neolithic: pottery, macrolithic pointed blades, triangular, leaflike and teardrop-like arrowheads with semi- surface retouch. are the sites where this early pottery occurs. In rough outline the presence of suitable local material. The most important the material culture of the northwestern group of the MK- sources were the flint mines of Rijckholt, but flint was also culture is characterized by the use of almost undecorated imported from Spiennes, the Haspengouw in Belgium and even pottery, of which pots with round bases and outward the north of France, from the vicinity of Romigny-Lhéry14. bending rims (tulip beakers) are most typical. In addition Little is known of the lay-out of the settlements. Until jars, bottles, spoons, storage jars and baking plates occur. recently the clearest example of a dwelling in the sandy area The composition of the range of pottery is often tied to a was a small rectangular building from Kruishoutem in particular region. Specific variations developed within the Belgium. However, this building turns out to have sprouted regions. A striking example is the Hazendonk-3 pottery from the excavator’s imagination and should therefore be decorated much more often and with a small range of removed as a source of knowledge of MK-culture shapes. In the flint industry macrolithic tools predominate, settlements15. Nevertheless, small rectangular buildings were usually made of imported mined flint. Characteristic tools in use during this period, as can be inferred from the are various types of quite thick arrowheads with semi- recently excavated settlement Wateringen IV. This is a small surface retouch, pointed blades, large blade and flake rectangular structure with dimensions of 11 by 4 metres. scrapers and axes, both of flint and stone. From Thieusies in Belgium a structure is known that might As yet, little is known of the economy of the Dutch MK10. be a building16. Within a causewayed enclosure a Information on the food supply is mainly provided by sites configuration of poles has been observed that are assumed to in the west of the Netherlands, like Brandwijk, Hazendonk, be housing constructions, but might also be part of the Rijswijk and Wateringen that date from this period, but may defense system. In France at Mairy in the Meuse valley a not be considered as typically Michelsberg11. In this large number of floor plans have been found with particular wetland area, not highly suited for agriculture, it is dimensions as large as 60 by 10 metres17. These floor plans not amazing that hunting and fishing were important are considered to be houses, but there is an alternative activities. Besides livestock, agriculture too contributed to explanation that this is an equivalent of the ‘causewayed the diet, as grain is known to occur on these sites. It is enclosures’, where various social and ritual acts were however doubtful whether grain was cultivated at the site performed. On the Aldenhovener Platte, on site Koslar 10, a itself. This would imply that elsewhere — probably in the large number of pits and post holes have been excavated, drier coversand area — agriculture contributed to a high allowing the inference of a rectangular structure of 6 by degree to the food supply12. The MK-sites containing grain 12 metres18. From some settlements in the eastern river are mainly located in the löss area. It is striking that on those district post traces are known, indicating the presence of sites mainly wheat was cultivated, whereas on the sites in houses there. Examples are Kraaienberg near Linden19 and the west of the Netherlands emmer and einkorn wheat were Pater Berthierstraat in Grave20. In the latter settlement still used13. Apparently the use of emmer and einkorn wheat, fragments of clay used for huts have been found as well. that already played such an important part in the food supply Besides permanent or semi-permanent settlements other in the Bandkeramik, continued in the coversand area. types of settlements are known as well. A small temporary It is remarkable that the production of tools was completely encampment is e.g. the site excavated in 1981 in Gassel21. In focused on good quality imported flint from the south, despite a quite different category are the large defenced areas known 142 as ‘causewayed enclosures’. These are mainly known from first specimen was recently discovered in Heerlen22. It is not the adjoining countries, Belgium and Germany, and impossible that there has been and partly still is one on the dominate settlement research there. In the Netherlands the Caberg near Maastricht23. abc def Fig. 3.3 Distribution of Middle Neolithic sites in the macroregion. a: triangular point; b: leaflike point; c: teardrop-like point; d: macrolites; e: pottery; f: settlements. 143 Almost nothing is known of burial procedures. In the sandy interred in a collective grave, like Stein40. Cremation of the area nothing has been found up to now, whereas in the west dead occurs with remarkable frequency in this period. of the Netherlands two cemeteries are known, a smaller one at Zoelen24 and a larger one at Rijswijk-Ypenburg25. In 3.3 The macroregion Belgium burials in caves are known26 In the macroregion there is a large number of sites from the The second phase of the Middle Neolithic is distinguished by Middle Neolithic, but it is hard to define the exact nature of the appearance of groups that are characterized archaeologically these sites. Therefore no statements can be made about as Wartberg/Stein/Vlaardingen27. After the discovery of the function and economy either. A relatively large number of Stein vault28, it became clear that much of the undecorated, guide artefacts can be distinguished for the Middle Neolithic quartz-grit tempered pottery belonged to this phase29. (fig. 3.2). For the Middle Neolithic A (MK-culture) these Subsequently it became apparent that there were strong are: three types of arrowhead, macrolithic flakes and blades, similarities in a material sense between the Vlaardingen- and pottery. Due to its fragility the last category is severely culture in the west of the Netherlands and the Wartberg under-represented. group from Hessen in Germany, and that all three could be Finds occur all over the Meuse valley, from Maastricht to considered a single cultural unit: the WSV-complex30. ‘s-Hertogenbosch, but with a distinct concentration in the Morphologically speaking, the range of pottery may be called middle of Limburg, southeast of Roermond (fig. 3.3a-f). poor. Simple cooking pots predominate, with occasional Individual objects like arrowheads and axes may indicate the appearances of small trays, bowls and collared flasks. Few occurrence of occasional activities like hunting, gathering diagnostic features are apparent in the flint industry as well.
Recommended publications
  • The University of Bradford Institutional Repository
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bradford Scholars The University of Bradford Institutional Repository http://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk This work is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our Policy Document available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this work please visit the publisher’s website. Where available access to the published online version may require a subscription. Author(s): Gibson, Alex M. Title: An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? Publication year: 2012 Book title: Enclosing the Neolithic : Recent studies in Britain and Ireland. Report No: BAR International Series 2440. Publisher: Archaeopress. Link to publisher’s site: http://www.archaeopress.com/archaeopressshop/public/defaultAll.asp?QuickSear ch=2440 Citation: Gibson, A. (2012). An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? In: Gibson, A. (ed.). Enclosing the Neolithic: Recent studies in Britain and Europe. Oxford: Archaeopress. BAR International Series 2440, pp. 1-20. Copyright statement: © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2012. An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? Alex Gibson Abstract This paper summarises 80 years of ‘henge’ studies. It considers the range of monuments originally considered henges and how more diverse sites became added to the original list. It examines the diversity of monuments considered to be henges, their origins, their associated monument types and their dates. Since the introduction of the term, archaeologists have often been uncomfortable with it.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, the 19Th of June 09:00 Garcia Sanjuan, Leonardo the Hole in the Doughnut
    monumental landscapes neolithic subsistence and megaliths 09:25 schiesberg, sara; zimmermann, andreas 10:40 coffee break siemens lecture hall bosch conference room Stages and Cycles: The Demography of Populations Practicing 11:00 schiesberg, sara Collective Burials Theories, Methods and Results The Bone Puzzle. Reconstructing Burial Rites in Collective Tombs 09:00 schmitt, felicitas; bartelheim, martin; bueno ramírez, primitiva 09:00 o’connell, michael 09:50 rinne, christoph; fuchs, katharina; kopp, juliane; 11:25 cummings, vicki Just passing by? Investigating in the Territory of the Megalith Builders The pollen evidence for early prehistoric farming impact: towards a better schade-lindig, sabine; susat, julian; krause-kyora, ben The social implications of construction: a consideration of the earliest of the Southern European Plains. The Case of Azután, Toledo. understanding of the archaeological fi eld evidence for Neolithic activity in Niedertiefenbach reloaded: The builders of the Wartberg gallery grave Neolithic monuments of Britain and Ireland 09:25 carrero pazos, miguel; rodríguez casal, antón a. western Ireland 10:15 klingner, susan; schultz, michael 11:50 pollard, joshua Neolithic Territory and Funeral Megalithic Space in Galicia (Nw. Of 09:25 diers, sarah; fritsch, barbara The physical strain on megalithic tomb builders from northern How routine life was made sacred: settlement and monumentality in Iberian Peninsula): A Synthetic Approach Changing environments in a Megalithic Landscape: the Altmark case Germany –results of an
    [Show full text]
  • The Medway Valley Prehistoric Landscapes Project
    AST NUMBER 72 November 2012 THE NEWSLETTER OF THE PREHISTORIC SOCIETY Registered Office University College London, Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY http://www.prehistoricsociety.org/ PTHE MEDWAY VALLEY PREHISTORIC LANDSCAPES PROJECT The Early Neolithic megalithic monuments of the Medway valley in Kent have a long history of speculative antiquarian and archaeological enquiry. Their widely-assumed importance for understanding the earliest agricultural societies in Britain, despite how little is really known about them, probably stems from the fact that they represent the south-easternmost group of megalithic sites in the British Isles and have figured - usually in passing - in most accounts of Neolithic monumentality since Stukeley drew Kit’s Coty House in 1722. Remarkably, this distinctive group of monuments and other major sites (such as Burham causewayed enclosure) have not previously been subject to a Kit’s Coty House: integrated laser scan and ground-penetrating landscape-scale programme of investigation, while the radar survey of the east end of the monument only significant excavation of a megalithic site in the region took place over 50 years ago (by Alexander at the The Medway Valley Project aims to establish a new Chestnuts in 1957). The relative neglect of the area, and interpretative framework for the Neolithic archaeology its research potential, have been thrown into sharper of the Medway valley, focusing on the architectural relief recently by the discovery of two Early Neolithic forms, chronologies and use-histories of monuments, long halls nearby at White Horse Stone/Pilgrim’s Way and changes in environment and inhabitation during the on the High Speed 1 route, and by the radiocarbon period c.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic Society in Northern Greece: the Evidence of Ground Stone Artefacts
    Neolithic society in Northern Greece: the evidence of ground stone artefacts Volume I Christina Tsoraki Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield October 2008 to (j3en ABSTRACT Analysis of ground stone technology from the Neolithic of Greece rarely goes beyond incomplete descriptive accounts to focus on the activities performed with these tools and the contexts of their use. Ground stone products are seen as mundane static objects devoid of meaning and lacking significance. The aim of this thesis is to move away from incomplete accounts of ground stone technology and static typologies. Drawing upon the concepts of the chaine operatoire and 'object biographies' this thesis investigates ground stone technology as a social practice focusing on the life-cycle of artefacts from raw material selection to final deposition. The underlying premise is that a contextual approach can contribute to understanding the ways in which the production, consumption and discard of ground stone artefacts were structured within different forms and scales of social practice and the manner in which these differences articulated different meanings and social understandings. The aims of the thesis were materialised through the study of the rich ground stone assemblage from the LN settlement of Makriyalos, Greece. The analysis of the chaine operatoire of the Makriyalos ground stone assemblage revealed diverse technological choices expressed throughout the cycle of production and use. Established traditions existed according to which specific materials were considered to be appropriate for the production of different objects. Furthermore, detailed analysis suggests that the resulting objects were far from mundane artefacts but were instead active media for expressing choices informed by cultural understandings of appropriateness.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information for Ancient Genomes from Present-Day France
    Supplementary Information for Ancient genomes from present-day France unveil 7,000 years of its demographic history. Samantha Brunel, E. Andrew Bennett, Laurent Cardin, Damien Garraud, Hélène Barrand Emam, Alexandre Beylier, Bruno Boulestin, Fanny Chenal, Elsa Cieselski, Fabien Convertini, Bernard Dedet, Sophie Desenne, Jerôme Dubouloz, Henri Duday, Véronique Fabre, Eric Gailledrat, Muriel Gandelin, Yves Gleize, Sébastien Goepfert, Jean Guilaine, Lamys Hachem, Michael Ilett, François Lambach, Florent Maziere, Bertrand Perrin, Susanne Plouin, Estelle Pinard, Ivan Praud, Isabelle Richard, Vincent Riquier, Réjane Roure, Benoit Sendra, Corinne Thevenet, Sandrine Thiol, Elisabeth Vauquelin, Luc Vergnaud, Thierry Grange, Eva-Maria Geigl, Melanie Pruvost Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Contents SI.1 Archaeological context ................................................................................................................. 4 SI.2 Ancient DNA laboratory work ................................................................................................... 20 SI.2.1 Cutting and grinding ............................................................................................................ 20 SI.2.2 DNA extraction .................................................................................................................... 21 SI.2.3 DNA purification ................................................................................................................. 22 SI.2.4
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Neolithic Transition - the ‘De-Neolithisation’ of South Scandinavia Iversen, Rune
    Beyond the Neolithic transition - the ‘de-Neolithisation’ of South Scandinavia Iversen, Rune Published in: NW Europe in Transition Publication date: 2013 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Iversen, R. (2013). Beyond the Neolithic transition: - the ‘de-Neolithisation’ of South Scandinavia. In M. Larsson, & J. Debert (Eds.), NW Europe in Transition: The Early Neolithic in Britain and South Sweden (Vol. 2475, pp. 21- 27). Archaeopress. B A R. International Series http://www.archaeopress.com Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 NW Europe in Transition The Early Neolithic in Britain and South Sweden Edited by Mats Larsson Jolene Debert BAR International Series 2475 2013 Published by Archaeopress Publishers of British Archaeological Reports Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED England [email protected] www.archaeopress.com BAR S2475 NW Europe in Transition – The Early Neolithic in Britain and South Sweden © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2013 ISBN 978 1 4073 1087 9 Printed in England by 4edge, Hockley All BAR titles are available from: Hadrian Books Ltd 122 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7BP England www.hadrianbooks.co.uk The current BAR catalogue with details of all titles in print, prices and means of payment is available free from Hadrian Books or may be downloaded from www.archaeopress.com CHAPTER 3 BEYOND THE NEOLITHIC TRANSITION - THE ‘DE-NEOLITHISATION’ OF SOUTH SCANDINAVIA Rune Iversen Abstract: In South Scandinavia, the Funnel Beaker culture is synonymous with the emergence of Neolithic societies (c 4000 BC), the construction of megalithic monuments and agricultural lifestyle. After c 1300 years of existence the Funnel Beaker culture ceased and a culturally blurred period began.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Neolithic Enclosures in Wales: a Review of the Evidence in Light of Recent Discoveries at Caerau, Cardiff
    The Antiquaries Journal, page 1 of 26 © The Society of Antiquaries of London, 2017 doi:10.1017⁄s0003581517000282 EARLY NEOLITHIC ENCLOSURES IN WALES: A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE IN LIGHT OF RECENT DISCOVERIES AT CAERAU, CARDIFF Oliver Davis and Niall Sharples, FSA, with a contribution from Jody Deacon Oliver Davis, School of History, Archaeology and Religion, University of Cardiff, John Percival Building, Colum Drive, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK. Email: [email protected] Niall Sharples, FSA, School of History, Archaeology and Religion, University of Cardiff, John Percival Building, Colum Drive, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK. Email: [email protected] Causewayed enclosures have recently been at the forefront of debate within British and European Neolithic studies. In the British Isles as a whole, the vast majority of these monuments are located in southern England, but a few sites are now beginning to be discovered beyond this core region. The search in Wales had seen limited success, but in the 1990s a number of cropmark discoveries suggested the presence of such enclosures west of the River Severn. Nonetheless, until now only two enclosures have been confirmed as Neolithic in Wales – Banc Du (in Pembrokeshire) and Womaston (in Powys) – although neither produced more than a handful of sherds of pottery, flint or other material culture. Recent work by the authors at the Iron Age hillfort of Caerau, Cardiff, have confirmed the presence of another, large, Early Neolithic causewayed enclosure in the country. Excavations of the enclosure ditches have produced a substantial assemblage of bowl pottery, comparable with better-known enclosures in England, as well as ten radiocarbon dates.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Neolithic Archaeology in 1955, C
    Journal of Neolithic Archaeology 23 November 2020 doi 10.12766/jna.2020.4 65 years later … – a re-evaluation of the Store Valby Article history: phase (MN V) of the late Funnel Beaker North Group Received 28 June 2019 Reviewed 14 October 2019 Published 23 November 2020 Rune Iversen Keywords: Funnel Beaker Culture, MN V, Store Valby phase, ‘bucket-shaped vessel Abstract complex’, TRB North Group, southern Scandinavia, 3rd millennium BC In 1955, C. J. Becker published the excavations at Store Valby, west- ern Zealand, Denmark, in the journal “Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyn- Cite as: Rune Iversen: 65 years later … dighed og Historie”. Except for an Early Neolithic phase, the site – a re-evaluation of the Store Valby phase showed Middle Neolithic occupation. Even if the flint inventory from (MN V) of the late Funnel Beaker North Group the latter phase resembled that of the late Funnel Beaker Culture, the JNA 22, 2020, 119 – 136 [doi 10.12766/jna.2020.4] associated pottery had a simpler and coarser character compared to the known Middle Neolithic Funnel Beaker pottery styles. On this ba- Author’s addresses: sis, Becker defined a new final phase of the northern Funnel Beaker Rune Iversen Culture named the Store Valby phase or MN V. However, new archae- Saxo Institute, Dept. of Archaeology ological features, such as palisaded enclosures, have turned up since University of Copenhagen Becker’s initial discoveries and new cultural insights into the contem- Karen Blixens Plads 8 porary Pitted Ware and early Single Grave Cultures have significant- 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark ly increased the cultural complexity of the earliest part of the 3rd mil- [email protected] lennium BC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Neolithic Tor Enclosures of Southwest Britain
    The Early Neolithic Tor Enclosures of Southwest Britain By Simon R. Davies A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of Ph.D. Funded by the AHRC. i University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract Along with causewayed enclosures, the tor enclosures of Cornwall and Devon represent the earliest enclosure of large open spaces in Britain and are the earliest form of surviving non-funerary monument. Their importance is at least as great as that of causewayed enclosures, and it might be argued that their proposed associations with settlement, farming, industry, trade and warfare indicate that they could reveal more about the Early Neolithic than many causewayed enclosure sites. Yet, despite being recognised as Neolithic in date as early as the 1920s, they have been subject to a disproportionately small amount of work. Indeed, the southwest, Cornwall especially, is almost treated like another country by many of those studying the Early Neolithic of southern Britain. When mentioned, this region is more likely to be included in studies of Ireland and the Irish Sea zone than studies concerning England.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking the Neolithic House in Europe Sedentism, Architecture, and Practice One World Archaeology
    One World Archaeology Daniela Hofmann Jessica Smyth Editors Tracking the Neolithic House in Europe Sedentism, Architecture, and Practice One World Archaeology Series Editors: Heather Burke, Flinders University of South Australia, Australia Gustavo Politis, Universidad Nacionaldel Centro, Buenos Aires, Argentina Gabriel Cooney, University College, Dublin, Ireland For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/8606 Daniela Hofmann · Jessica Smyth Editors Tracking the Neolithic House in Europe Sedentism, Architecture and Practice 1 3 Editors Daniela Hofmann Jessica Smyth School of History, Archaeology and Religion School of Chemistry Cardiff University University of Bristol Cardiff Bristol United Kingdom United Kingdom ISBN 978-1-4614-5288-1 ISBN 978-1-4614-5289-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-5289-8 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012954540 © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recita- tion, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or infor- mation storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar meth- odology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplica- tion of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Neolithic and Bronze Age Monument Complex and Its Early Medieval Reuse: Excavations at Netherfield Farm, South Petherton, Somerset, 2006
    02 Mudd:Layout 1 03/07/2013 08:49 Page 3 A Neolithic and Bronze Age Monument Complex and its Early Medieval Reuse: Excavations at Netherfield Farm, South Petherton, Somerset, 2006 andrew mudd and mark brett With contributions by Hugo Anderson-Whymark, Stuart Black, Sarah Cobain, Jonny Geber, Frances Healy, Nathalie Marini, E. R. McSloy, Elaine L. Morris, Kathryn M. Price, Sylvia Warman, Geoff Warren, Nick Watson, Keith Wilkinson and Tim P. Young An early Neolithic causewayed enclosure, a middle Neolithic long enclosure and an earlier Bronze Age open enclosure were among a group of prehistoric features discovered and examined by excavation at Netherfield Farm, South Petherton during archaeological mitigation work ahead of the construction of a natural gas pipeline between Ilchester and Barrington, Somerset, in 2006. Of particular interest were burnt deposits within the long enclosure ditches and a possible Bronze Age field system. Assemblages of pottery and flintwork contribute to the understanding of these features and a programme of radiocarbon dating has amplified the chronology of activity on the site. Evidence from a group of burnt and unburnt pits and a partial enclosure reveal the reuse of the site between the fifth and eighth centuries AD. INTRODUCTION The discovery and partial excavation of a group of prehistoric monuments at Nether - field Farm, South Petherton, in Somerset provides new information on the distribu - tion and use of monumental architecture in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain. The group comprised an extensive spread of remains, including a causewayed enclo sure, a long enclosure and a linear arrangement of ring-ditches, and is the first of this type of complex to be found in Somerset.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceramics and Society in Northern Europe Southern Scandinavia And
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CLoK Ceramics and Society in Northern Europe Johannes Müller and Rick Peterson Southern Scandinavia and Northern Germany Johannes Müller The origins of pottery in Southern Scandinavia and Northern Germany The earliest types of pottery in Southern Scandinavia and Northern Central Europe have different origins and histories of development. On typological grounds we are dealing both with pottery in a late Mesolithic context (late Ertebølle c. 4300 cal BC onwards) and pottery associated with Neolithic ways of life (TRB, or Funnel Beaker, societies starting c. 4100 cal BC) (Fischer and Kristiansen 2002; Jöns et al. 2009; Klassen 2004). The relation and origin of both is a focus of debate: while Ertebølle ceramics were seen traditionally to reflect southern influences from contemporary early horticulturalists on the Nordic Mesolithic foragers, some researchers are modelling different origins for Ertebølle and TRB assemblages. Ertebølle pottery is associated with Mesolithic/Epipalaeolithic pottery traditions, stretching from central Siberia to Brittany (Jordan and Zvelebil 2009; Matiskainen 2011; Andersen 2011; Piezonka 2011). The use of pointed-bottomed vessels is known from foraging societies which integrated some domesticates and cultivates into their economy but did not change in principle their foraging identity. No pottery or other imports imply any kind of innovative southern influences on this development; rather ceramics are seen as an independent innovation. By contrast, Funnel Beaker pottery is associated with changes related to the spread of horticulture into the North European Plain, enhanced by the expansion of an enclosure building society from the west (early Michelsberg of the Paris Basin and the Rhinelands) and late Lengyel developments within south-eastern horticultural communities (e.g., Gatersleben groups of the Middle-Elbe-Saale region).
    [Show full text]