The $-12$ Mag Dip in the Galaxy Luminosity Function of Hickson
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Draft version August 16, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The −12 mag dip in the galaxy luminosity function of Hickson Compact Groups∗ Hitomi Yamanoi,1, 2 Masafumi Yagi,2, 3 Yutaka Komiyama,2, 4 and Jin Koda5 1Center for Information and Communication Technology, Hitotsubashi University, 2-1 Naka, Kunitachi, Tokyo 186-8601, Japan 2Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 3Department of Advanced Sciences, Hosei University, 3-7-2 Kajinocho, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8584, Japan 4Department of Astronomical Science, School of Physical Sciences, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 5Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800, USA (Received March 10, 2020; Revised June 29, 2020; Accepted July 1, 2020) Submitted to AJ ABSTRACT We present the galaxy luminosity functions (LFs) of four Hickson Compact Groups using image data from the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam. A distinct dip appeared in the faint-ends of all the LFs at Mg ∼ −12. A similar dip was observed in the LFs of the galaxy clusters Coma and Centaurus. However, LFs in the Virgo, Hydra, and the field had flatter slopes and no dips. As the relative velocities among galaxies are lower in compact groups than in clusters, the effect of galaxy-galaxy interactions would be more significant in compact groups. The Mg ∼ −12 dip of compact groups may imply that frequent galaxy-galaxy interactions would affect the evolution of galaxies, and the dip in LF could become a boundary between different galaxy populations. Keywords: galaxies: groups: individual (Hickson Compact Group) | galaxies: luminosity function, mass function | galaxies: dwarf 1. INTRODUCTION Faint-ends (M > −12) of the LFs were investigated The galaxy luminosity function (LF) is a powerful tool in the cluster regions in our local neighborhood. Tren- for describing the properties of galaxy density in various tham & Tully(2002) represented the faint-end slopes of environments. A comparison between various LFs pro- LFs down to MR = −10 in five different environments. vides clues to the environmental dependence of galaxy These slopes were not as steep as those of the theoret- formation and evolution. The LFs of galaxy clusters ical mass function obtained from the cold dark matter show a distinct upturn in the −18 < M < −16 magni- (CDM) model. Yamanoi et al.(2012) found a significant tude range (e.g., Binggeli et al. 1988; Yagi et al. 2002; dip of MR ∼ −13 in the LF of the Coma cluster and a Parolin et al. 2003; Popesso et al. 2005; Mercurio et al. steep slope at the faint-end of MR > −13. The Centau- 2006; Barkhouse et al. 2007; Rines & Geller 2008; Lan rus cluster LF of Chiboucas, & Mateo(2006) showed a et al. 2016), while the LFs in the field environments dip at −14 < MV < −13, and a sign of a dip was seen arXiv:2007.02493v1 [astro-ph.GA] 6 Jul 2020 have flatter slopes to the faint-end (e.g., Blanton et al. in the Fornax LF (Hilker et al. 2003). In contrast, the 2005). The upturn of M ∼ −18 indicates a division LFs of the Virgo (Trentham, & Hodgkin 2002; Saba- of dominant galaxies between giant and dwarf galaxies tini et al. 2003; Lieder et al. 2012; Ferrarese et al. 2016) (e.g., Binggeli et al. 1988; Ferguson, & Sandage 1991; and Hydra clusters (Yamanoi et al. 2007; Misgeld et al. Trentham, & Hodgkin 2002; de Lapparent et al. 2003). 2008) did not show such a dip. In a lower-density re- gion such as the loose groups, Trentham et al.(2005) provided a composite LF of the neighboring four galaxy Corresponding author: Hitomi Yamanoi groups within the Local Group towards MR ∼ −10, and [email protected] confirmed a weak dip of MR ∼ −11. The other result ∗ Based on data collected at Subaru Telescope, which is operated also indicated that some loose groups tend to show a by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. 2 Yamanoi et al. deficiency of galaxies at −12 < MV < −11 (M¨ulleret al. 2018). The faint-end dip may reflect the presence of physical processes in galaxy formation and/or evolution that are driven by environmental effects. A large sample of LFs in various environments is required to understand the origin of the faint-end dip. In this paper, we focus on compact groups, which have several giant galaxies con- centrated in a small region. Galaxy interactions would have a more significantly impact in compact groups than in galaxy clusters as the relative velocities of galaxies are smaller, and hence, the effective interaction timescales are longer, while interactions with hot gas would be weaker. Previous studies of the LFs of compact groups Figure 1. Completeness of extended objects as a function of g-band magnitude for each HCG image. The 90% com- are summarized in AppendixA. There are very few stud- pleteness is plotted as dashed line. HCG79 and HCG59 show ies of the LFs that cover the magnitude ranges fainter more than 90% completeness at mg < 24:7, while the 90% than M ∼ −12. To investigate the faint-end dip in com- completeness of HCG44 and HCG68 are down to mg ∼ 25. pact groups, we studied the faint-ends of LFs with deep images of compact groups selected from the catalog of scope and Rapid Response System 1 (Pan-STARRS1) Hickson Compact Groups (HCGs; Hickson 1982). were referred to as astrometric catalogs. We detected objects using SExtractor (Bertin, & 2. OBSERVATIONS Arnouts 1996) and adopted MAG AUTO for measuring the The HCG fields were observed with the Hyper magnitude, while excluding the saturated objects. The Suprime-Cam (HSC: Kawanomoto et al. 2018; Furusawa limiting magnitude of point sources was estimated by et al. 2018; Komiyama et al. 2018; Miyazaki et al. 2018) measuring sky counts with the 200-diameter aperture in mounted on the Subaru Telescope. The HSC uses 104 the reduced image. We applied the Gaussian fitting of science CCDs, which cover 1:5◦ field-of-view in diam- the histogram of sky counts and calculated the 5σ limit- eter with a pixel scale of 0:1700. The observation was ing magnitude, which resulted in ∼ 26 mag in each im- made in the queue mode on 2016 March 8 UT. The age (see Table1). We also estimated the detection com- seeing size (the full width at half maximum, FWHM) pleteness of extended sources, creating mock galaxies in was ∼ 0:800. Although the targets discussed in this pa- the magnitude range of 20.0 { 28.0 with the Image Re- per are only a part of all the targets of our project, duction and Analysis Facility (IRAF: Tody 1986, 1993) and the completion of the project depends on future ob- task gallist. We embedded these galaxies into the servations, we analyzed the first four fields that were object subtracted images, which were obtained as the obtained so far. The g-band images of the four fields SExtractor check images of -OBJECTS, using mkobjects. (HCG44, HCG59, HCG68, and HCG79) based on the The galaxies were measured using SExtractor, and the catalog by Hickson et al.(1992) were obtained. Their corresponding parameters were adjusted to be the same redshifts were found to be less than 0.015, and no other as the detecting threshold for real objects. We evalu- group or cluster is known around the redshifts in these ated the detection rates for every 0.25 magnitude bin fields. We summarize our targets in Table1. We referred for the mock galaxies on the entire field of view of the to the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) for HSC image. Figure1 indicates that a 90% complete- the redshift (z) and the distance modulus (m − M) cor- ness fraction was attained for the extended objects at rected to the cosmic microwave background reference mg = 24:7, which corresponds to Mg = −9:4 for the frame, as shown in Table1, with default cosmological most distant galaxy group (HCG79). No completeness −1 −1 parameters H0 = 73 km s Mpc ,Ωmatter = 0:27 correction was performed when we evaluated the LFs in and Ωvaccum = 0:73. We use the AB-magnitude system the > 90% completeness range. throughout this paper. The galactic extinctions in g-band (Ag) in Table1 obtained from NED were adopted when we converted 3. DATA REDUCTION magnitudes from the apparent to the absolute values. The g-band images were reduced using HSC Pipeline (Bosch et al. 2018) version 4.0.5. We used dome flats for flat fielding. The data of the Panoramic Survey Tele- 4. LUMINOSITY FUNCTION HCG LF 3 Table 1. Observed HCGs Field RA Dec z Exp. Times m − MAg mlim (5σ) (J2000.0) (J2000.0) (min) (mag) (mag) (mag) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) HCG44 10:20:45.5 +21:33:37 0.0057 78 31.8 0.09 26.0 HCG59 11:51:01.0 +12:25:59 0.0147 60 33.9 0.11 26.3 HCG68 13:55:42.4 +40:05:17 0.0086 60 32.8 0.04 26.2 HCG79 16:01:23.8 +20:37:11 0.0148 30 33.9 0.21 26.1 In order to estimate the number of member galaxies, ten negative after background subtraction. This sug- we used the statistical background subtraction method gests a statistically significant deficit in group members (Bernstein et al. 1995). Our HSC image has a field of around this magnitude. In order to construct the to- view of ∼ 1:5◦ in diameter and is wide enough to cover tal of the LFs of all the HCGs, we first converted the both the HCG and its outer regions.