DOCSLIB.ORG

CFA Level 1 Financial Ratios Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CFA Level 1 Financial Ratios Sheet CFA Level 1 Financial Ratios Sheet Activity Ratios Solvency ratios Ratio calculation Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs Total debt Debt-to-assets day-to-day tasks, such as the collection of receivables and Total assets management of inventory. The table below clarifies how to Total debt Dept-to-capital calculate most of the activity ratios. Total debt + Total shareholders’ equity Total debt Dept-to-equity Total shareholders’ equity Activity Ratios Ratio calculation Average total assets Financial leverage Cost of goods sold Total shareholders’ equity Inventory turnover Average inventory Number of days in period Days of inventory on hands (DOH) Coverage Ratios Ratio calculation Inventory turnover EBIT Revenue or Revenue from credit sales Interest coverage Receivables turnover Interest payements Average receivables EBIT + Lease payements Number of days Fixed charge coverage Days of sales outstanding (DSO) Interest payements + Lease payements Receivable turnover Purchases Payable Turnover Average payables Profitability Ratios Number of days in a period Number of days of payables Payable turnover Profitability ratios measure the company’s ability to Revenue generate profits from its resources (assets). The table below Working capital turnover Average working capital shows the calculations of these ratios. Revenue Fixed assets turnover Average fixed assets Return on sales ratios Ratio calculation Revenue Total assets turnover Average total assets Gross profit Gross profit margin Revenue Operating profit Operating margin Liquidity Ratios Revenue EBT (Earnings Before Taxes) Pretax margin Liquidity ratios measure the company’s ability to meet its Revenue short-term obligations and how quickly assets are converted Net income Net profit margin into cash. The following table explains how to calculate the Revenue major liquidity ratios. Return on investment ratios Ratio calculation Liquidity ratios Ratio calculation Operating income Opearting ROA Average total assets Current assets Current Current liabilities Net income ROA Average total assets Cash + Short term marketable securities + Receivables Quick Current liabilities EBIT Return on total capital Debt + Equity Cash + Short term marketable securities Cash Current liabilities Net income ROE Average total equity Cash + Short term marketable securities + Receivables Defensive interval Net income - Preferred dividends Daily expenditures Return on common equity Average common equity Cash conversion cycle DOH + DSO - Number of days of payables Valuation Ratios Solvency Ratios Valuation ratios measure the quantity of an asset or flow Solvency ratios measure a company’s ability to meet long-term (i.e., earnings) associated with ownership of a specified claim obligations. Subsets of these ratios are also known as “leverage” (i.e., a share or ownership of the enterprise). The following and “long-term debt” ratios. tables show the most of the common valuation ratios. Page 1 analystprep.com CFA Level 1 Financial Ratios Sheet Valuation ratios Ratio calculation Price per share Ratio calculation Price per share P/E Earnings per share FFO + Interest paid - Operatinf lease adjustments FFO (funds from operations) Gross interest (prior to deductions for capitalized Price per share interest coverage PC/F interest or interest income) Cash flow per share Price per share P/S Sales per share EBIT Price per share Return on capital Average capital P/BV Book value per share where Capital = Equity + Non-current deffered taxes + Debt FFO Price per share Ratio calculation FFO (Funds from operations) to debt Total debt Net income - Preferred dividends CFO (adjusted) - Capital expenditures Basic EPS Free operating cash flow-to-debt Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding Total debt CFO - Capital expenditures - Dividend paid Net income - Preferred dividends Discretionary cash flow-to-debt + Aftertax interest on ordinary shares outstanding Total debt Diluted EPS Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding FFO - Dividends + Number of common shares that would Net cash flow-to-capital expenditures have been issued at conversion Capital expenditures CFO - Preferred dividends Cash flow per share Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding Leverage Ratios EBITDA EBITDA per share Leverage ratios measure the extent to which a company uses Average number of common stock liabilities rather than equity to finance its assets Dividends paid Dividends per share Number of shares outstanding Leverage Ratios Total debt A Dividend - related ratios Ratio calculation Debt-to-assets ratio Total assets Common share dividends Total debt A Dividend payout ratio Debt-to-capital ratio Net income attributable to common shares Total debt + Total equity Total debt A Net income attributable to common shares Debt-to-equity ratio Total equity Retention rate (b) - Common share dividends Net income attributable to common shares Average total assets Financial leverage ratio Average equity Sustainable growth rate b x ROE A| Debt is defined as the sum of interest-bearing short-term and long-term debt. Segment Ratios Solvency Ratios Segment ratios are important for segment reporting. Solvency ratios measure a company’s ability to meet long-term Remember that a company doesn’t have to disclose obligations. Subsets of these ratios are also known as “leverage” information about all of its segments; they only need to be and “long-term debt” ratios. disclosed if that segment constitutes 10 percent or more of the combined operating segments' revenue, assets, or profit. If the revenue of the reported segments is less than 75% of Price per share Ratio calculation the revenue of the entire company, more segments must be reported until the 75% level is reached. EBIT EBIT interest coverage Gross interest (prior to deductions for capitalized interest or interest income) Segment ratio Numerator Denominator Indication Measures a segment’s Segment profit Segment margin Segment revenue profitability relartive to its (loss) revenues EBITDA EBITDA interest coverage Gross interest (prior to deductions for capitalized Measures a segment’s interest or interest income) Segment turnover Segment revenue Segment assets ability to generate revenue using assets Measures a segment’s Segment profit Segment ROA Segment assets operating profitability (loss) relative its assets Measures a segment Segmentt debt ratio Segment liabilities Segment assets solvency Page 2 analystprep.com CFA Level 1 Financial Ratios Sheet Performance Ratios Performance ratios are based on CFO. CFO is operating cash flow under US GAAP or under IFRS, conditional to the fact that the company includes interest paid in operating activities. Leverage Ratios Calculation Indication CFO Operating cash generated per Cash flow to revenue Net revenue dollar of revenue CFO Operating cash generated per Cash return on assets Average total assets dollar of asset investment CFO Operating cash generated per Cash return on equity Average shareholders’ equity dollar of owner investment CFO Cash to income Cash generated from operations Operating income CFO - Pref.dividends Operating cash flow on a per Cash flow per share Number of common share basis shares outstanding CFO Ability to pay debts with Debt payment Cash paid for long operating cash flows term debt repayment CFO Ability to pay dividends with Dividend payment Dividends paid operating cash flows CFO Ability to acquire assets, pay Investing and Financing Cash outflows for investing debts, and make distributions and financing activities to owners CFO Financial risk and financial Debt Coverage Total debt leverage CFO + Interest paid + Taxes paid Ability to meet interest Interest Coverage Interest paid obligations CFO Ability to acquire assets with Reinvestment Cash paid for long term assets operating cash flows Page 3 analystprep.com.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mortgage-Equity and 9 Residual Valuation Techniques
    MORTGAGE-EQUITY AND 9 RESIDUAL VALUATION TECHNIQUES Introduction In this chapter we move from the stable income, all-cash world depicted in the previous chapter, to the reality that property is typically purchased with financing, creating debt leverage. Our focus is the mortgage- equity or M-E technique. This valuation technique is founded on the premise that the overall rate should reflect the importance of separate yields attributable to the equity position and to the debt position. The M-E technique is not as commonly used as capitalization or discounted cash flow in everyday real estate practice. However, the M-E technique is helpful in certain situations to: $ determine overall rates; $ derive building and land capitalization rates for residual techniques; $ analyze the capitalization rates derived through other techniques; $ test separately determined value estimates; or $ graphically analyze financial components of an overall rate.1 This chapter begins with some history on the evolution of the M-E method. Early valuation methods did not consider the impact of mortgage financing. To explore this impact, economists in the 1950s developed new valuation techniques, the first of which was Band of Investment or BOI. Roughly speaking, BOI can be considered a forerunner to the mortgage-equity method, so in order to better understand M-E, it is useful to have a quick primer on its BOI predecessor. The goal of BOI is to determine an overall capitalization rate by building up the rate from the key factors that investors consider when making an investment decision. These factors include: • The initial loan-to-value ratio; • Interest rate on the loan; • The entrepreneur’s equity investment; and • The rate of return on investment expected.
    [Show full text]
  • Return on Assets and Its Decomposition Into Operating and Non- Operating Segments
    International Journal of Latest Engineering and Management Research (IJLEMR) ISSN: 2455-4847 www.ijlemr.com || Volume 02 - Issue 09 || September 2017 || PP. 22-31 Return on Assets and Its Decomposition into Operating and Non- Operating Segments C.A. (Dr.) Pramod Kumar Pandey Associate Professor, National Institute of Financial Management, Faridabad Abstract: Return on total assets (ROA) is a significant indicator of growth of business operations of an entity. It is broader concept than Return on equity (ROE) and Return on investment (ROI). Increase in Return on total assets (ROA) creates wealth for all stakeholders as against Return on Equity (ROE) which creates returns only for Equity Shareholders. This paper has analyzed Return on total assets (ROA), Return on equity (ROE) and Earnings per share (EPS) after decomposition of each into operating and non-operating segments. This paper concludes that for better financial analysis both operating and non-operating segments of return on total assets (ROA), Return on investment (ROE) and Earnings per share (EPS) should be analyzed. Keywords: ROA, ROI, ROE, Operating and Non-operating JEL CLASSIFICATION: M41, G32, G33 and G34 I. Introduction Return on total assets (ROA) is a significant indicator of growth of business operations of an entity. It is broader concept than return on equity (ROE) and return on investment (ROI). Increase in Return on total assets (ROA) creates wealth for all stakeholders as against Return on Equity (ROE) which creates returns only for Equity Shareholders. Further, Return on investment (ROI) takes into consideration only shareholders and lenders but ignores current liabilities. It tells how much return has been generated by investing Rupee one of the capital employed.
    [Show full text]
  • FS Double Dividend and Revenue Neutrality 01 02
    Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia and the Pacific FACT SHEET Figure 1: The double dividend through environmental tax and fiscal reforms Double dividend and revenue neutrality Key point • Double dividend and revenue neutrality principles enhance effectiveness, public acceptance and feasibility of environmental tax and fiscal reform measures. Double dividend and revenue neutrality explained The double dividend hypothesis states that a revenue neutral restructuring of the tax system, whereby green taxes are increased in proportion to a decrease in traditional taxes (income tax), could not only improve envi- ronmental quality (the first dividend) but also reduce the distortion of the tax system and the cost of labour, The prospects for winning the double dividend varies from country to country and depends on the structure of subsequently generating higher levels of employment (second dividend). relative preferences (the demand elasticity for ‘dirty’ goods and resources) and infrastructure available, the levels of investment in environmental research and development and the low use of distorting non- Revenue neutrality is a fiscal policy tool that can be used to overcome political resistance to an increase in envi- environmental taxes. ronmental taxes by seeking to have the same proportional reduction in income tax, pension contributions or possibly even value-added taxes (VAT), while striving to maintain a net-zero increase in the overall taxation of the It is also important to carefully design a supporting policy system, including regulations and investment environ- economy. ment, that will create incentives for a change of consumers towards environment-friendly consumption and to provide alternatives to more resource-inefficient lifestyles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Changes in Return on Assets, Return on Equity, and Economic Value Added to the Stock Price Changes and Its Impact on Earnings Per Share
    Research Journal of Finance and Accounting www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1697 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2847 (Online) Vol.6, No.6, 2015 The Effect of Changes in Return on Assets, Return on Equity, and Economic Value Added to the Stock Price Changes and Its Impact on Earnings Per Share Dyah Purnamasari Lecturer of Widyatama University Bandung & Doctoral Students of Management Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Pansudan University, Bandung, Indonesia 1. Introduction Along with the development of economic globalization are experiencing rapid change and development, the reality show that will affect the development of the business world. Competition between firms regional, national, and international heavier. Companies are required to be able to withstand competition in the continuity of the wheels of business. Companies are not only to be able to compete in the trade market, but also in the capital markets. The capital market is a means to make investments that allow investors to diversify investments, forming a portfolio according to the risk they were willing to bear the expected profit rate. Investments in securities are also liquid (easily changed), therefore it is important for the company always pay attention to the interests of the owners of capital by way of maximizing the value of the company, because the value of the company is a measure of the success of the operations are financial functions. Capital markets and securities industry is one of the indicators to assess a country's economy going well or not. This is due to the company in the stock market are large companies and credible in the country concerned, so if there is a decrease in the performance of the stock market can be said to have occurred also a decline in the performance of the real sector (Sutrisno, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Reading and Understanding Nonprofit Financial Statements
    Reading and Understanding Nonprofit Financial Statements What does it mean to be a nonprofit? • A nonprofit is an organization that uses surplus revenues to achieve its goals rather than distributing them as profit or dividends. • The mission of the organization is the main goal, however profits are key to the growth and longevity of the organization. Your Role in Financial Oversight • Ensure that resources are used to accomplish the mission • Ensure financial health and that contributions are used in accordance with donor intent • Review financial statements • Compare financial statements to budget • Engage independent auditors Cash Basis vs. Accrual Basis • Cash Basis ▫ Revenues and expenses are not recognized until money is exchanged. • Accrual Basis ▫ Revenues and expenses are recognized when an obligation is made. Unaudited vs. Audited • Unaudited ▫ Usually Cash Basis ▫ Prepared internally or through a bookkeeper/accountant ▫ Prepared more frequently (Quarterly or Monthly) • Audited ▫ Accrual Basis ▫ Prepared by a CPA ▫ Prepared yearly ▫ Have an Auditor’s Opinion Financial Statements • Statement of Activities = Income Statement = Profit (Loss) ▫ Measures the revenues against the expenses ▫ Revenues – Expenses = Change in Net Assets = Profit (Loss) • Statement of Financial Position = Balance Sheet ▫ Measures the assets against the liabilities and net assets ▫ Assets = Liabilities + Net Assets • Statement of Cash Flows ▫ Measures the changes in cash Statement of Activities (Unaudited Cash Basis) • Revenues ▫ Service revenues ▫ Contributions
    [Show full text]
  • [3] Appendix C—Financial Ratios, Formulas, and Interpretation
    The Basics of Construction Accounting Workshop Key Financial Ratios One key element in any financial analysis is the comparison of financial ratios; however, mere comparison to industry averages may have limited value. The real usefulness lies in comparing individual ratios to each other over time. For instance, an analysis that explains a change in the current ratio over the past two years will be more useful than an explanation of the variance between a company’s current ratio and a published “industry average” current ratio. Industry averages of various ratios can be useful as a beginning bench- mark for comparison purposes and as an indication of industry competition. The interpretation of financial ratios provided on the following pages is not intended to represent all possible interpretations and is only an example of how these ratios may be used. There may be other interpretations of these financial ratios. (From Financial Management & Accounting for the Construction Industry, CFMA; Chapter 1. © 2010 Matthew Bender and Company, Inc., a member of the LexisNexis Group. For permission to reprint, contact [email protected].) LIQUIDITY RATIOS Ratio Formula Interpretation Indicates the extent to which current assets are Current Ratio Current Assets available to satisfy current liabilities. Usually stated Current Liabilities in terms of absolute values (i.e., “2.1 to 1.0” or simply “2.1”). Generally, a minimum current ratio is 1.0, which indicates that current assets at least equal current liabilities. (Cash and Cash Equivalents Indicates the extent to which the more liquid assets Quick Ratio + Short-Term Investments are available to satisfy current liabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Ratios Ebook
    The Corporate Finance Institute The Analyst Trifecta Financial Ratios eBook For more eBooks please visit: corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/ebooks corporatefinanceinstitute.com [email protected] 1 Corporate Finance Institute Financial Ratios Table of Contents Financial Ratio Analysis Overview ............................................................................................... 3 What is Ratio Analysis? .......................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Why use Ratio Analysis? .....................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Types of Ratios? ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Profitability Ratio .......................................................................................................................... 4 Return on Equity .................................................................................................................................................................................................................5 Return on Assets .................................................................................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • QUESTIONS 3.1 Profitability Ratios Questions 1 and 2 Are Based on The
    140 SU 3: Profitability Analysis and Analytical Issues QUESTIONS 3.1 Profitability Ratios Questions 1 and 2 are based on the following information. The financial statements for Dividendosaurus, Inc., for the current year are as follows: Balance Sheet Statement of Income and Retained Earnings Cash $100 Sales $ 3,000 Accounts receivable 200 Cost of goods sold (1,600) Inventory 50 Gross profit $ 1,400 Net fixed assets 600 Operations expenses (970) Total $950 Operating income $ 430 Interest expense (30) Accounts payable $140 Income before tax $ 400 Long-term debt 300 Income tax (200) Capital stock 260 Net income $ 200 Retained earnings 250 Plus Jan. 1 retained earnings 150 Total $950 Minus dividends (100) Dec. 31 retained earnings $ 250 1. Dividendosaurus has return on assets of Answer (A) is correct. (CIA, adapted) REQUIRED: The return on assets. DISCUSSION: The return on assets is the ratio of net A. 21.1% income to total assets. It equals 21.1% ($200 NI ÷ $950 total B. 39.2% assets). Answer (B) is incorrect. The ratio of net income to common C. 42.1% equity is 39.2%. Answer (C) is incorrect. The ratio of income D. 45.3% before tax to total assets is 42.1%. Answer (D) is incorrect. The ratio of income before interest and tax to total assets is 45.3%. 2. Dividendosaurus has a profit margin of Answer (A) is correct. (CIA, adapted) REQUIRED: The profit margin. DISCUSSION: The profit margin is the ratio of net income to A. 6.67% sales. It equals 6.67% ($200 NI ÷ $3,000 sales).
    [Show full text]
  • Publication 538, Accounting Periods and Methods
    Userid: CPM Schema: tipx Leadpct: 100% Pt. size: 10 Draft Ok to Print AH XSL/XML Fileid: … ons/P538/201901/A/XML/Cycle04/source (Init. & Date) _______ Page 1 of 21 15:46 - 28-Feb-2019 The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. Department of the Treasury Contents Internal Revenue Service Future Developments ....................... 1 Publication 538 Introduction .............................. 1 (Rev. January 2019) Photographs of Missing Children .............. 2 Cat. No. 15068G Accounting Periods ........................ 2 Calendar Year .......................... 2 Fiscal Year ............................. 3 Accounting Short Tax Year .......................... 3 Improper Tax Year ....................... 4 Periods and Change in Tax Year ...................... 4 Individuals ............................. 4 Partnerships, S Corporations, and Personal Methods Service Corporations (PSCs) .............. 5 Corporations (Other Than S Corporations and PSCs) .............................. 7 Accounting Methods ....................... 8 Cash Method ........................... 8 Accrual Method ........................ 10 Inventories ............................ 13 Change in Accounting Method .............. 18 How To Get Tax Help ...................... 19 Future Developments For the latest information about developments related to Pub. 538, such as legislation enacted after it was published, go to IRS.gov/Pub538. What’s New Small business taxpayers. Effective for tax years beginning
    [Show full text]
  • Demand Dividend: Creating Reliable Returns in Impact Investing
    Demand Dividend: Creating Reliable Returns in Impact Investing June, 2013 Demand Dividend is a debt vehicle designed to improve the repayment cycle for impact investors and ease capital access for social enterprises. Demand Dividend grew out of the need to find alternatives to debt, convertible debt, and equity as funding mechanisms for social enterprises. Demand Dividend has four key features: Key Characteristic Demand Equity Debt Revenue Dividend Royalty A structure designed to enable successful capital exit (a “round X X X trip”) Payments linked to the enterprise’s ability to pay X A return profile commensurate with investor risk in frontier X X X enterprises Incentives to align investor and entrepreneur interests X Demand Dividend is designed to enable investors to generate a reliable, reasonable return while allowing social entrepreneurs to maintain control and efficiently deploy capital. Impact Investing Issues Impact investors targeting small, growing businesses (SGBs) face a variety of issues. In our view, the most relevant are: Underperformance on the return promise. • Exits from equity or convertible debt deals have been rare, • Reliance on the venture capital approach of generating a few “big wins” has not materialized, and • Investable enterprises have been “screened out” due to high portfolio return hurdles. Misalignment of investor and SE incentives. • Exit preferences may be in conflict: the investor prefers a buyout or IPO while the SE desires family or community control, and • Views may diverge on the importance of reliable financials and meeting projections. Scarcity of capital targeting frontier economy SGBs. • Traditional debt or equity instruments are not appropriate; debt does not compensate for risk, and equity lacks a defined liquidity event, and • Relatively fixed due diligence costs are hard to justify for $20,000 to $250,000 investments.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Lending Profitability at the Loan Level: an Introduction
    FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Measuring Lending Profitability at the Loan Level: An Introduction [email protected] 877.827.7101 www.ProfitStars.com FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE “How much am I making on this deal?” has been a fundamental question posed by bankers for as long as currency has been used as a medium of exchange. This has never been an easy question to answer, as doing so requires one to consider a variety of revenues and costs, many of which are anything but straightforward to quantify. Loan pricing models attempt to do this by computing the interest rate necessary to fairly compensate lenders for all of the costs of delivering money to their customers. These include not only tangible costs (e.g., their own cost of funds, salaries and other overhead) but the less tangible, indirect costs of bearing risk in many different forms. This is achieved by disaggregating the various costs of doing business in the banking industry and assigning a value to each of those costs. Having done this, a loan-level net income and return on allocated capital can be determined for various combinations of loan interest rates, fees and other sources of revenue. Many lending institutions employ less-than-scientific methods for pricing loans. Lending rates are usually a function of the competitive environment, with rates being set at whatever the market will bear. This “seat of the pants” approach can and often does get banks in trouble. Loans that are booked (in hindsight) at less than profitable spreads can become a significant drag on a bank’s net interest margin and earnings, even if none of them default.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Analysis: Do IFRS Standards Signal the End of the ROCE? by Bruno Husson()1
    Financial analysis: Do IFRS standards signal the end of the ROCE? By Bruno Husson()1 Financial analysts are - or should be - amongst the most assiduous readers of the consolidated accounts published by listed companies, quite simply because this reading is one of the key components of their profession. By neglecting to do so at the height of the stock-market frenzy in 1999-2000, several star analysts had their fingers burnt and tarnished the credibility of an entire profession. More recently, examples of large scale accounting malpractice, as revealed by Enron-type stock- market scandals, have shown the difficulties faced by financial analysts and the importance of the issues underlying thorough analysis of accounting data.()2 In other words, such events militate strongly in favour of a return to established professional principles which dictate that a meticulous examination of previous accounting statements represents the obligatory starting point for any analysis. In such a context, the new IFRS accounting standards, which shall apply to any listed European company from 2005 onwards, seem to arrive at just the right moment, as they are primarily designed to improve the quality of the financial information that is available to investors with regard to their investment choices. Furthermore as their very role is to shed light on these choices, financial analysts should be very pleased about the arrival of these new standards. However, the widely-voiced scepticism towards the IFRS clearly shows that this is not the case. The reasons for this situation are explained in this article, which analyses the impact of the IFRS on the calculation and interpretation of one of the most emblematic ratios in modern financial analysis: the ROCE (Return On Capital Employed).
    [Show full text]