ESTIMATES of the POPULATION of COUNTIES I JULY 1, 1966* (Report No.1)

Series P-25, No. 401 August 28, 1968

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES I JULY 1, 1966* (Report No.1)

(Estimates shown here are generally ()onsistent with those published for metropolitan counties July 1, 1965, shown in Current Population Reports, Series P-25, Nos. 371 and 378. They supersede the provisional metropolitan county estimateEl for July 1, 1966, sho~ in report No. 378)

This report presents estimates of the population METHODOLOGY for Jiliy 11, 1966, for 940 counties in 20 selected States. This is the first of three reports showing Three methods are employed by the Bureau of population estimates for all the counties in the the Census in developing current county estimates. United States for July 1, 1966. These estimates They are (1) the Bureau's Component 'Method II, relate to the total resident population in each which employs vital statistics to measure natural county; that is, the civilian resident population increase and school enrollment (or school census) ;Jlus members of the Armed Forces stationed in data as a basis for measuring net migration; (2) the area. a composite method, in which separate estimates are prepared for different segments of the popula The States covered in this report are: Arkansas, tion using different types of current data for each California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, group; and (3) a housing unit method, in which esti Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Min mated changes in the number of occupied housing nesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Caro units are used as the basis for estimating Changes lina, Oklahoma, Pennsylyania, Rhode Island, in population. Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia. Estimates are shown for J ul y 1, 1966, for each county in these States, together with the components of The methodology used in developing current population change (births, deaths, and net migration) estimates by these three methods is discussed in for the period since April 1, 1960. Summaries Current Population Reports, Series P-25, No. 371. for each State are also shown for metropolitan and A detailed step-by-step outline of Component nonmetropolitan counties. Method II is presented in Series P-25, No. 339.

* These estimates were prepared in the .State and Local Population Estimates and Projections Branch, Population DiviSion, in connection with a contractual arrangement to provide data for metropolitan areas and counties to the following Federal agencies: the Office of Civil Defense, the Economic Development Administration (Department of Commerce), the Office of Transportation Information Planning (Department of Transportation), and the Defense Communic,ations Agency (Department of Defense).

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Ojfice, Washington, D.C. 20402,15 cents. Annual subscriptiMt (Series P-20, P-23, P-25, P-27, P-28 summaries, P-60, and P-65, combined), $5 .. 00; foreign mailing, $6.50. "FOr'tfi'is repo'r't, all three methods were employed counties indicated as metropolitan are whole-county in developing estimates for metropolitan counties approximations to the SMSA's. Adetailedexplana::'

,~.11,i1UJ3tatE:s and for th,~ nonl1!E:t}:QPolitan c()Unti~s in c tion of the criteria used in establishing SMSA's is California, Maryland, New Jersey, Rhode Island, given in Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas, and Virginia.1 For all remaining counties, esti Executive Office of the President, Bureau 01' the mates were developed by Component Method II and Budget, 1967. the Composite method only. The results of the two or three methods were then averaged. ROUNDING OF ESTIMATES

As a final step, the average estimates for the Estimates presented in the tables contained in counties in each State were summed and adjusted this report have been rounded to the nearest hundred to an independent State total published in Current for counties and to the nearest thousand for States PORulation Reports, Seri.es P-25, No. 380. Addi without being adjusted to group totals, which are tional adjustments were made as needed in special independently rounded. Percentages are based on population groups, such as college and institutional unrounded numbers. popUlations, since the regular estimating method ology would not be expected to reflect fully any FEDERAL-STATE COOPERATIVE PROGRAM large or unusual changes in these groups. FOR LOCAL POPULATION ESTIMATES

Special estimates for selected areas.--For a The estimates presented in this report are a number! of areas, additional data are available for "one-time" set of estimates prepared by the Bureau use. in:, the preparation of population estimates. of the Census as a by-product of a larger project Such sources as special censuses conducted by the now under way for a number of Federal agencies. Bureau of the Census since 1960 and censuses Preparation of corresponding annual postcensal conducted by State or county governments have estimates for all the counties in the country is not been drawn upon. Counties where estimates have now part of the Census Bureau's program. In been prepared using these special data sources recognition of the widespread need for. small-area are fqotnoted in the table. Areas particularly population estimates of uniform quality from State affected are Delaware, Rhode Island, and 21 to State, the Bureau of the Census has been counties in North Carolina, which had special developing a cooperative program with the States censuses conducted by the Census Bureau, and for the preparation and publication of county Massachusetts, which had a State-conducted census. population 'estimates. The ultimate objective of the cooperative program is the development and LIMIT ATIONS publication of State-prepared county population figures, by preferred methods, largely standardized A detailed discussion of the limitations of the for data input and methods mutually agreed upon by various methods used in the preparation of metro the States and the Bureau of the Census. politan county estimates and of the relationship of estimates prepared by each method to the pub The selection of methods will be made on the lished average of methods is contained in report basis of a large-scale test and evaluation program No. 371. A large proportion of the counties for to be carried out when the 1970 Census results which estimates are presented in this report, how become available. To date (as of July 1, 1968) ever, had a population under 20,000. Theestimates 39 States have agreed to participate in the program, for these smaller areas may not have as high a working with the Census Bureau to achieve the level of accuracy, on the average, as those for large goals described above. A listing of the States and metropolitan areas. the agencies designated by State governors to work with the Bureau of the Census on the technical DEFINITIONS aspects of the program is given in the appendix. 2 Metropolitan counties are those counties in During this past year, several States have cluded in standard metropolitan statistical areas published county population estimates in consul (SMSA's) as of June 1968. InNewEngland, however, tation with the Bureau of the Census, using method SMSA's are defined in terms of towns and cities, ology largely within the general framework of the rather than counties. Therefore the New England 2For a more detailed description of the program, . lHousing'unit estimates were developed for non see, Meyer Zitter, "Federal-State Cooperative Pro metropolitan counties where evidence indicated thai; gram for J...ocal Population Estimates," Tl;te Regisi;rar completeness of coverage of areas reporting resi and Statisticia~, U.S. Department of Health, Educa deni;ial building permits issued was very high. tion, and Welfare, January 1968. 3 goals of the Federal-State Cooperative ·Program. Leonard M. Sizer, Estimates of the Population The State-prepared county estimates are contained of West Virginia Counties, July 1,1950-1966, in the following reports: November 1967, Office of Research and Development, Center for Appalachian Studies Population Estimates of Arizona as of July 1, and Development, West Virginia University, 1967, Research and Reports Section, Un Morgantown, West Virginia. emplpyment Compensation Division, Employ ment) Security Commission of Arizona, In general, the State-prepared county population Phoepix, Arizona. figures differ only slightly from those contained in this report, and the pattern of population redistri bution since 1960 is quite similar for both sets. Forrest H. Pollard, "Preliminary Estimates Small differences in the two sets of estimates come of the Population of Louisiana Parishes: about because of differences in data input, differ July 1, 1966," The Louisiana Economy, ences in the specific methods used in arriving at Volume 1, No.1, April 1968, Division of final "average" estimates, or as is the case in Business and Economic Research, School Arizona, a difference in the total State populati.on to of Business Administration, Louisiana Poly which the county estimates were adjusted. technic Institute, Ruston, Louisiana. In later years, should the objectives of the Federal-State Cooperative Program for Local C. Horace Hamilton, Estimates of the Popu Population Estimates be realized, the Bureau of the lation of North Carolina Counties, 1966 and Census would publish State-prepared estimates 19'67, Demographic Report H-l, May 1968, similar to those published in the above-mentioned Statistical Service Center, Budget Division, reports in lieu of preparing its own estimates. In State Department of Administration, Raleigh; all such instances, however, the sum of the county and Carolina Population Center, University estimates would be in agreement with the independ of; North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North ently prepared State population estimates regularly Carolina. published in this series of reports. 4 ESTIMAtES'OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1,1960 (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Ohange, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

State and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Number Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census)

ARKANSAS:••...... ••.••.•. 1-__1:,., 9_5_6:..;,:...(_10_0+ __1.:.,_78_t:..;c ,:...;_'7_2+ ___1_69 _,,-(_)(_!0-(. ___9_. 5_' l-- __2:...~6 __ 6:..;,:...0 __ O __0+ __ 1::::1 __ 7!..., 0 __ 0=.-0+ __.-::2.:0.:, ::::00:.:0 26,(,00 2'0,355 3,300 lA-I 3,800 1,500 ')00 ArkaIlsas .••••.•.••••••... ••••••·•·•• . Ashley ...... 26,200 ;220 ;000 8.1 3,900 1,400 -SOD Baxter ...... 11,900 ,; ~~~ ; ')00 19'/, 1,100 900 1,700 Benton ....••••.••.•••.•••••••••...... ,.3,800 ,~I< 500 20.8 4,700 3,100 6,000 17,200 ;~~~ 1,100 7.0 2,000 1,100 300 Doone .••.••••••••..•. ······••··•··•• . Bradley ...... 14,500 ,v.:;'" 500 3.3 1,800 1,000 -300 6,300 ; 991 300 4·.5 SOO ".00 200 Calhoun .•.•••••.••.•.• · •. ····••••••• . 11,500 ; 284 200 2.1 1,200 900 -100 Carroll ••.•.•...... •...•••••• ••••••· . Chieot .••..•...•••..•...... ·.····•·· . 20,800 ; ~;? 1,800 9.6 3",.00 1,400 -100 122,800 ,7JV 1,900 9.0 2,1,00 1,4.00 800 Clark ..•.•••••••••••.•••• ·•••····••• . 21,800 21,258 500 2.3 2,700 1,400 -'/00 Clay .•...•.•••..••.••.•.•.... · .. ···• . Cleburne ..••••••••••••••..•.• · ••• ••• . 10,200 9,059 1,200 12.8 1,000 600 800 1 6,700 6,9'.4 -200 -3.1 800 500 -500 Cleveland ••..••••••..•••.•.•. •·••·•• . 26,600 26",00 200 0.7 3,700 1,600 -1,900 Columbia .•...... •..••...•.. ····•·• . 17,900 15,430 2,500 16.3 2,000 1,000 1,6()O Conway •• i,'- ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Craighead' ...... " ...... 151,500 47,303 4,200 9.0 6,600 2,600 200 Crawford'''; •.....•..•...... ••..•.•... 24,200 21,318 2,900 13.6 3,100 1,500 1,300 Crittenden* ...... ••...... 52,200 47,564 4,600 9.6 10,400 2,800 -3,000 Cross •.•...... ••....•••.••. ,••••.•••• 20,600 19,551 1,100 5.5 3,100 1,200 -900 10,100 10,522 -1+00 -4.1 1,200 800 -800 Dallas .....•••...••.. ·······•··••••· . 20,400 20,770 -400 -1.8 3,800 1,200 -3,000 1: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 16,100 15,213 900 5.7 2,200 1,000 -300 ~~:~f~ :: : 1 ,100 2L,,303 7,800 32.0 3,300 5,900 Faulknerz ...•....•...• · .• ••·•···•·•· . 32 :~?? 1l,JOO 10,213 1,000 10.2 1,300 uV" 600 Franklin ...... •.•...•.... ···•····••• . Fulton .•' ...... ••...... •.• , •...... 7,800 6,657 1,200 17.5 700 500 1,000 51,300 46,697 4,600 9.8 5,900 L,,600 3,200 Garland ...... •.•.••...•... ·•·•··• . Grant ...... 9,500 8,294 1,200 14.0 900 500 800 24,600 25,198 -600 -2.4 3,000 1,500 -2,100 Greene •...•••.••.••••••• ·•··•·•·•··• . Hempstead .•..•.••.••••••....••••••••• 20,700 19,661 1,000 5.1 2,300 1,600 300 22,300 21,893 500 2.1 2,400 1,300 -700 Hot Spring ...... : ...... •••• 11,400 10,878 500 5.0 1,400 800 -100 Howard ...... ····••·•· • Independence ...... ••••.•...... • 22,700 20,048 2,700 13.4, 2,300 1,500 1,900 6,600 6,766 -200 -2.5 600 500 -300 Izard ...... ·•·· .. ·· . 23,700 22,843 900 3.8 3,200 1,400 -900 Jackson ...•..•••.••..•... ·· •• ·•·•••• • 88,100 81,373 6,800 8.3 13,500 5,100 -1,600 Jefferson* ...... •.•..•.•••• , ..•.. ••• . Johnson .....•.•..•..••..•.... · ••• · ••. 12,600 12,421 200 1.5 1,300 1,000 -100 10,200 11,030 -800 -7.5 1,500 800 -1,500 Lafayette ...... · .. . 17,200 17,267 -100 -0.5 2,300 1,200 -1,200 Lawrence ...... · ... ··· . 23,900 21,001 2,900 13.6 4,300 1,300 -200 Lee ...... •· .. •••• .. · 14,200 14,447 -300 -1.9 2,200 800 -1,700 Lincoln ..•....••••..••... · ••• ·····•· . Little River •.•••....•.•...... • ·•·· 9,600 9,211 400 3.8 1,200 700 -100 17,600 15,957 1,700 10.4 1,900 1,300 1,100 Logan .••....•••..••.•..•. ··•·••·•·•· . 26,900 24,551 2,300 9.5 3,900 1,600 100 Lonoke .••...... •.•....•. ·····•···•• . Madison ...... •.•.•...... ·· .. ··• • 10,300 9,068 1,200 13.0 1,000 600 800 6,700 6,041 600 10.5 500 SOD 600 Marion ....•.•... ~ ..•.•.•..•..••••..•. Mille1'* •. '.: •.•..•••..•....••.••.•.••. 34,200 31,686 2,500 7.9 4,400 2,200 300 76,100 70,174 5,900 8.4 13,800 3,800 -L.,200 Mississippi ...... ••...... ~ .. 17,800 17,327 500 2.8 2,900 1,200 -1,300 Monroe ••••.•.•..••... · •.• •·•····•·•· . Montgomery ...... 5,500 5,370 200 3.3 500 400 (z) 11,200 10,700 500 5.0 1,300 800 (z) Nevada ••••.•...... •.. ·· •. ·•··•····•· . 6,400 5,963 500 7.8 700 300 100 Newton ••.•....•..•...... ···.·•··•·· . Ouachita ...... 32,OCO 31,641 400 1.3 3,800 1,900 -1,400 4,600 4,927 -400 -7.2 600 300 -600 Perry ...... ·· •• ·•·•·•• . Phillips .•.•••••.••.....••... · ... •·· . 46,900 43,997 2,900 6.6 8,500 2,900 -2,700 8,800 7,864 1,000 12.2 1,000 700 600 Pike ••••..•...... •••.•••• ·•·•··••••• . 29,800 30,834 -1,100 -3.4 5,000 1,600 -4.500 Poinsett ..•.•••...•••...•.••• •·····• • 12,700 11,981 700 5.8 1,200 1,000 600 Polk •••..••••.•....••••.. ·•··•·••··• . Pope ..•••...... •...... •.• : ...••••.••• 26,4,00 21,177 5,200 24.4 3,000 1,4,00 3,600 Prairie ...... •..•.•...•...... ••. · ••. 11,000 10,515 500 4.7 1,300 700 -100 280,000 242,980 37,000 15.2 39,800 14,600 11,800 Pu1aski* ...... ••.•••..•..•. · •• ··•· . Randolph •...... •..••....••..••• 11,400 12,520 -1,200 -9.3 1,600 900 -1,900 st. "'rands ...... · .. · 34,600 33,303 1,300 3.8 7,000 1,900 -3,800 32,100 28,956 3,100 10.7 3,400 1,400 1,100 Saline* ...... •..•.. ······• . Scott ...... 8,300 7,297 1,000 13.7 900 500 600 Searcy ...... ·· .. 8,900 8,124 800 9.5 1,400 600 (z) 73,600 66,685 6,900 10.3 11,300 4",00 (Z) SebastianoX· ••••••••••• , ••••••••••••••• 12,100 10,156 1,900 18.8 1,200, 800 1,600 Sevier ...•..••.•..•..•... · •.• •·····• .

See footnotes at end of table. 5

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

State and county Net July 1 April 1, Deaths 1966 ' 1960 Nurr.ber FercerrL Births migration (census) ______L __"__ , _____" ______-j- ______---~r_.--.-"--+------+---""--.-."------

ARKANSAS--Gont inued (2) 6,1,00 100 2.0 ()oo 500 Sharp ...... ••...... ·.······· . 700 400 500 Stone ...... •...... •...... 7,100 800 13.3 3,100 -3,200 Union ...... •...... 50,300 $00 1.5 7,000 700 500 (Z) Van Huren ...... ···· 7,400 200 2.5 8,100 12,000 Washington ...... •. '72 600 16,800 30.0 3",00 Lj ,300 2,300 4,000 White ...... •..•...•...... •.. 38; 700 6,000 18.3 2.9 2,600 900 -1,300 Woodruff ...... ·.····· . 14,',00 400 1,400 11.9 I,MJO 900 900 yelL ...... •...•.•.. ·.············· . 13 ",00 912,000 1,649,000 CALIFORNIA ...••.....••.••.•...•.. lil,B02,000 15,717,20" 3,085,000 19.6 2,348,000 55,500 LIB,600 Alameda"x" ...... •...••.••..•...... •... 1,030,400 908,209 122,200 13 .5 129,100 400 397 (z) -5.8 100 (Z) (Z) 800 11,100 9,990 1,100 10.7 1,000 800 1l,200 6,600 Hl,600 Butte .....•...... •...... •..•...••. ·· . 1105 300 82,030 23,200 28.3 2,200 20.9 1,100 800 1,900 Calaveras .•; ....•.•...... •.•••.••.•.. 12>,00 10,289 (z) 12,700 12,075 600 5.1 1 600 1,000 Colusa .... ::; ...... • 65,000 514,400 ,,09,030 105,trOO 25.8 58;400 17,900 Contra C08·ij~:X ...... •.•.••.•••.••.••.. -2,600 16,700 17,771 -1,100 -6.0 2,500 900 Del Norte ...... •••••.•••.••••..••••.. 13,900 245 ,900 29,390 16,500 56.2 Lr,irOO 1,700 El Dorado .....•....•.•.•..•••..•••• ·· 19,900 10,900 Fresno* .•..•.....•...... •...... 41',,300 365,945 L,8,400 13 .2 57 ,400 1,200 600 Glenn ...... •...... 18.900 17,245 1,600 9.4 2,200 5",00 -12,300 Humbo14t .. ; ...... •...... •.... 101,300 104,892 -3,600 -3.4 14,200 6,800 9.4 12,/,00 3,500 _2,100 Imperial .. ~ ...... •...... 278 900 72,105 1,800 15.5 1,400 900 1,300 Inyo ...... •.•...... ······· . 13;500 11,684 11.4 ',6,000 lie, 700 2,000 Kerrl'X", ••• " •••••••••••••.••••••••••••• 325,200 291,984 33,300 9,900 3,000 10,800 Kings ...... •.... ·.··· . 67,700 49,954 17,700 35.5 18,500 13,786 4,800 34.6 1,300 1,600 5,000 Lake ...... ·.········ . 800 3,900 Lassen •.••..••..•.•••••••.••••••••.•. 118 400 13 ,597 4,800 35.0 1,700 357 900 276,200 IDs A:ngeles-* •...... 6,814;500 6,038,771 775,700 12.8 857,400 5,800 2;400 -200 Madera ...••..•...•..••.•.•••.•.•.•• · . 43,600 40,468 3,200 7.8 20,900 7,200 28,000 ,.": Marin7<" ...... ·••• 188,600 146,820 41,700 28.4 600 400 1,000 Mariposa ....•...... •.•....•••...• 6,200 5,OM 1,100 21.8 5,800 2,900 -2,800 Mendocino .••...... •.•...... · •....• ' 51,100 51,059 100 0.1 4,600 5,300 r·1erced .••...... •...... •.. 107,300 90,446 16,800 18.6 16,200 500 -1,200 Modoc .•...... •.•. 7,500 8,308 -800 -9.5 900 300 200 1,100 Mono ..•...•.....••....•.... · •..•.•..• 3,500 2,213 1,300 57.4 31,600 9,300 9,300 Monterey* ...... 2229,900 198,351 31,600 15.9 4,300 9,700 Napa"" ....••....••••..•.•....•.••••... ' 78,200 65,890 12,300 18.6 7,000 2,000 4,600 Nevada ...... 25,900 20,911 5,000 23.9 2,400 35,600 363,700 Orange* ...... •.•..•.••• 1,171,400 703,925 467,400 66.2, 139",00 15,700 ' 76,500 56,998 19,500 3'h2 7,700 3,800 Placer* ...•.....•••.....••...... •... 400 12,700 11,620 1,100 9.2 1,500 900 Plumas ...•...... ··.····•·• . 20,700 81,400 Rivers ide* ..•....•....•...... ••..•• 415,600 306,191 109,400 35.7 /+8,700 597,700 502,778 94,900 18.9 80,200 27,100 41,800 Sac rarnento* ...... •.•••••...•..• 2,300 19,100 15,396 3,700 24.0 2,300 900 San Benito ...... •••• ···· 28,800 74,400 San BernarQ. ipo* •...... •...... •. 628,900 503,591 125,300 24.9 79,700 1,188,000 1,OJ3,011 155,000 15.0 158,400 50,900 47,500 San Diego* •.....•...... ••.. · •. ··· 61,400 -49,900 San Franc isco* .•...... •..•.•...•.... 714,600 740,316 -25,700 -3.5 85,600 15,800 16,600 San J oaquin* ...... •••.. 283,500 249,989 33,500 13 .4 32,700 5,500 10,400 San Luis Obispo ••••.•••..•....•.••••. ' 97,300 In, 044 16,200 20.0 11,300 32,900 519,100 4',4,387 74,700 16.8 62,500 20,700 San Mateo* ....•...•...... ••• ·•····•·· 9,900 63,500 Santa Barbara* ...... ' 253 ,400 168,962 84",500 50.0 30,900 118,800 30,000 198,700 Santa Clara* .....•..••.•..•.••.•••••. ~29,800 642,315 287,500 44.8 10,600 8,300 26,400 Santa Cruz ...... 112,900 84,219 28,700 34.1 8,700 3,500 10,800 Shasta ...... •...... ····· . 75,500 59,468 16,000 27.0 300 200 200 Sierra ...... •...... · ... , 2,600 2,247 300 14.6 2,200 400 Siskiyou ...... •...•...•...... 35,000 32,885 2,100 6.5 3,900 6,400 13,200 Solano* .....••..•••••..•.•••..• ·•·· •• 165,700 134,597 31,100 23.1 24,300 11,300 35,500 Sonoma ...•...... •.•.....•...•.•. 193,700 147,375 46,400 31.5 22,200 9,800 18,000 Stanis laus ...... 187,300 157,294 30,000 19.1 21,800 5,500 42,500 33,380 9,100 27.2 5,500 2,000 Sutter ...... •••••..•...... • · •• ···•• . 3,600 1,700 1,800 Tehama ...... '...... 29,000 25,305 3,700 14.7 1,000 500 -1,900 Trinity ...... •....•.....••. · . 8,200 9,7C6 -1,500 -15.0 13.2 21,,600 9,400 7,000 Tulare ...... •...... · .. ··•··•·· • 190,600 168,403 22,200 1,600 1,ZOO 4,800 Tuolumne ...... •....•...... ·.····· . '19,600 14,404 5,200 36.0 339,000 199,138 139,900 7C.2 38,400 10,100 111,500 Ventura* ...... •...... 11,100 ' 83 ,800 65,727 18,100 27.5 10,400 3,500 Yolo* .....•.•...... ···•···••••• . 2,000 8,000 yuba ...... •..•...... ·· •. 46,900 33,859 13,000 38.5 7,100

See footnotes at end of table. 6 ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960··Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Population Components of change 1960 to 1966 State and county April 1, July 1, Net 1960 Nurr.bcr Percent Births Deaths 1966 migration (census)

CONNJ£CTI ClTT •••.•.•••.••••.••••••. 1-_._--'-__-'-_+ __ -'-_'-_+- ___3_4_3-'-,_0_00-+ ___13__ . 5--+ __:_35_0-",-0_0_0+_"::56,000 Fairfield,' ...... •.. 757,(!OO 10L,,000 15 .9 86,200 L,O, 100 57,900 Hartford>, ....•.•...••.•.•..•....•.... 781,300 91,700 13.3 97,100 40,100 3/f,800 Litchf ie Id ...... 133,900 11.,100 n.? 15,300 8,100 6,900 Middlesex ...... ~ ...... •.. 10'1,600 '18700 21.1 12,600 5,500 11,600 New I-Iaven* •••••••.•.••••...•••••••• ,. 707,200 1:<800 7.1 86,500 "2,200 2,600 New London-x- ••..•••••••••••••••••••••• 52 20,200 3L,,500 18.6 31,BOO 11,L,OO 14,100 Tolland ....•....••..•..••...•••..•.•. 92,700 23,900 34.8 10,600 3,200 16,500 Windham ...... •...•....•...... 77,800 9,300 13.5 9,500 5,000 ;',700

DELAWARll ...... •... 6'1,000 1<4·.9 71,000 2'1,000 23,000 Kent ...... •...... 278 900 13,200 20.2 12,,,.00 3,500 L.,".OO New CaGtle·K ...... •.•..•.•.. 2356'500 49,000 15.9 <47,300 18,100 19,800 Su.ssex ...... 277;600 4,L,00 6.1 11,300 5,Lf OO -1,,,.00

5,893,000 339,000 569,000 Alachua .. ,...... •.•....•. 19L,,800 7/1,074 20,700 27.9 D 200 3,900 11,400 Baker ...... •..••...... •.•.... 7,900 7,363 ';00 1;200 400 -200 66,200 67,131 -1,000 11,300 2,900 -9,300 113 ,500 12,/-+46 1,100 B.5 1,700 800 100 Brevard ...... •...... •..•.. 212,500 lll,435 101,000 90.7 24,900 5,300 81,500 464,400 333,946 130;L,00 39.1 ',7,000 24,200 107,700 Calhoun...... 7,500 7,<422 100 1.2 1,000 500 -500 Charlotte ...... 20,700 12,594 8,100 64." 1,300 1,700 8,400 Citrus ....•...••••...... •.. 13 ,200 9,268 3,900 42.5 1,200 900 3,700 Clay .... ;, ...... •...... 22,100 19,535 2,600 13.1 3,200 1,100 400 Collier ...... •.•..... 28,000 15,753 12,300 77.8 3,100 1,200 10,300 Columbia .•...•.•.••...•••..•••.••.•.• 24,100 20,077 4,000 20.0 3,1,00 1,500 2,100 Dade- ...... 1,080,600 935,047 145,500 15.6 118,600 60,500 87,400 De Sato ...... •....•.•.•. , ...... ••. 13,700 11,6B3 2,000 17.5 1,600 800 1,300 Dixie ...... •...... •.•..•.•••.••••• 5,100 4,479 600 14.2 900 300 100 Duval-1<- ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 499,200 455",11 43,800 9.6 75,900 25,400 -6,700 Escambia-x· .•••••••••••••••.••••••••••• 192,500 173,829 IB,700 10.7 31,000 8,lDO -4,200 Flagler ...... ••.•.•...... •.... 4, BOO 4,566 200 4.4 600 300 -100 P'ranklin .•...... •.•...... •.... 7,700 6,576 1,100 17.1 1,100 500 600 Gadsden ...... •...... 143,600 41,989 1,600 3.? 6,900 2,300 -3,100 Gilchrist .••...•••....•.•.....•...... 3,000 2,868 100 2.9 400 200 -100 Glades ...•...... •...•..•...••...•••.. 4,000 2,950 1,100 36.1 400 200 BOO Gulf ...... 9,100 9,937 -BOO -B.O 1,500 500 -1,800 }Iamilton . . '...... •.....••.. 7,700 7,705 -100 -0.7 1,200 500 -BOO Hardee ...... ••...... 13 ,400 12,370 1,000 B.4 1,800 800 100 Hendry ...•.•••••.••.••...••••.....•.. 12,100 8,119 ':;.,000 49.2 1, BOO 500 2,700 Hernando ..•...... ••..••...... •.••... 13,200 11,205 2,000 18.2 1,800 1,000 1,200 Highlands ...... 125 ,600 21,338 4,300 20.0 3,400 1,800 2,700 Hills borough* ...... •....•.•.....••. 4<47,000 397,788 49,200 12.4 57,600 26,000 17,600 Holmes .•..••.••••••••.•••••••.•.••••. 11,300 10,844 500 4.5 1,100 800 100 Indian River ..••...... •...••...•..••. 32,600 25,309 7,300 28.9 <4,100 2,000 5,200 Jackson ...... •...... •••.••..•••.• 34,400 36,.208 -1,900 -5.1 4,300 2,000 -4,100 Jefferson ...... •...••••.•. 9,400 9,543 -100 -1.3 1,500 700 -900 Lafayette ...... 2,700 2,889 -200 -6.2 300 200 -300 Lake .•...•....•....•...... •.....•.••. 64,300 57,383 6,900 12.1 7,400 4,BOO 4,300 Lee ...... 76,800 54,539 22,300 40.9 8,300 4,400 18,400 Leon* ...•.•...•••...... •..•...••..••. IB7 300 74,225 13,100 17.6 1l,400 3,,,00 5,100 Levy .••.•.••••••••.••••••••.••••..... 12;500 10,364 2,100 20.5 1,500 800 1,300 Liberty ...... 3,000 3,138 -200 -5.6 400 200 -400 Madison •••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••. 14,100 14,154 (Z) -0.2 2,000 900 -1,100 Manatee ..•.•..•.••.•...••.•.••...... 75,700 69,168 6,500 9.4 7,100 6,600 6,000 Marion .....•.•...... •...••••..•... 63,800 51,616 12,200 23.6 8,600 3,900 7,400 Martin .•••...•••...••..•••••.•..•.••. 23,500 16,932 6,500 38.6 2,500 1,500 5,500 lJlonroe ...... •..•...... •.•. 52,600 47,921 4,700 9.7 8,400 2,300 -1,500 Nassau ...... •...•....•.•..•••.••••.•. 17,700 17,189 500 3.0 2,600 900 -1,100 Okaloosa ..•..•....••..••..••••.....•. 76,900 61,175 15,700 25.7 13,200 1,900 4,500 Okeechobee ...... •...... 9,BOO 6,424 3,400 52.2 1,400 400 2,400 Orange* ...... •. 307,300 263,540 43,700 16.6 41,400 14,900 17,300 Osceola ...... •..•.•. 20,700 19,029 1,700 8.9 2,200 2,100 1,600 Palm Beacl1+:: •.••••..••.•••..••.••••... 287,400 22B,106 59,300 26.0 32,500 17,300 4L,,100 Pasco •.•••....•...... •.....••. 4<4,800 36,785 8,000 21. 9 3,BOO 3,800 8,000 Pine11as* •••...•••.•••••...... • 430,800 374,665 56,200 15.0 35,200 40,600 61,600

See footnotes at end of table. 7

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960"Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Ohange, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

state and county April 1, July 1, Net 1960 Number Percent Births Deaths mi.gration 1966 (census) __. ___~ __. ___ . ______l-----il__-----+__---___l---_I------j------l----

ll'f. m )- 12,000 16,200 Polk ...... 227,000 195,139 31,900 16.3 27,600 1,400 4.3 5,100 2,100 -1,600 Putnam ...... • ...... ••••• 33,600 32,212 1,000 3.4 3,900 2,300 -600 St. Johns ...... •••••• 31,000 30,034 6,200 2,800 Lt , I~OO St. LucJe ...... 47,000 39,294 7,700 19.6 6,300 1,400 -2,500 Santa Rosa* ...... 32,000 29,547 2,400 8.2 18,000 23.4 8,100 7 100 17,000 Saras ota ...... ~ ...... 94,900 76,895 13,400 24.4 9,400 3;200 '7 200 Semino1e~· ... ~ ...... 68,400 5',,947 14.5 1,700 900 1;000 Sumter ...... '" 13,600 11,869 1,700 Ie., 961 2,000 D.D 2,100 1,100 900 Suwan:nee ...... 9 ...... "''', 16,900 2,000 800 .. 900 Taylor ...... 13,500 13,168 300 2.6 (z) 700 300 -400 Union ...... "" ...... "' ...... 6,000 6,043 -0.2 2,5.9 12,600 33,800 Volusia ...... 161,500 125,319 36,200 ,,00 300 (z) Wakulla ...... 5,700 5,257 '1.5 14,800 15 5'16 -SOO -5.0 700 1,000 -1,500 Walton ...... 800 .. 800 Washington," ...... 1l.,000 n;2e9 -200 -1.8 IDAHO. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 1-__6_9_7..:.,_0_00-+ ___6_6_'7,-,1_9_1_. -1-__3.'. 0":"_0_00--j ___~_h_5-+-_._9_6..:.,_0_0_O+_...... :.3_6-,-,_0_Oo_+ ____--_,30,-,0_00 99,200 93,460 5,700 6.1 13,100 5,:LOO -2,300 Ada* ...... • ... ••• .. •••••• AdaffiB ...... 3,000 2,978 100 2.1 400 200 -200 149,800 ',9,342 e·OO 0.8 8,000 -5,1,.00 Bannock ...... •• .. • .. • .. . Bear Lake ...... : ...... 6,400 7,148 -700 -10.1 900 -1,200 Benewah .• ) ...... 6,500 6,036 500 7.5 800 400 100 BiD.gham ••• ·...... 29,600 28,218 1,400 5.0 4,BOO 1,300 -2,100 Blaine ...... 5,400 4,598 800 16.5 600 300 500 1,500 1,646 -100 -7.8 200 100 -200 Boise ...... ~ ...... e ••• 6 e ...... Bonner ...... • .. • ...... 15,100 15,587 -500 -3.4 1,600 1,000 Bonneville ...... 51,700 46,906 4,800 10.3 8,600 1,700 5,200 5,809 -600 -10.3 700 400 -900 Boundary ...... ~ ...... 3,300 3,4.98 -200 -5.2 500 100 -600 Butte ...... • .. •• .. ••• .. •• 700 917 -200 -19.0 100 100 -200 Camas ...... ; ...... ••• • 60,400 57,662 2,800 4.8 7,600 3,500 -1,400 Canyon ...... 700 Caribou ...... •• .. .. 7,300 5,976 1,300 21.8 900 300 18,000 16,121 1,900 11.6 2,900 800 -200 Cassia ...... • .. •• .... ••• .. 600 915 -300 -31.3 100 100 -300 Clark ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• -300 Clearwater ...... 9,000 8,548 500 5.6 1,200 400 2,600 2,996 -400 -12.8 300 200 -600 Custer ...... -2,200 EJJllOre. " ...... 1'7,800 16,719 1,100 6.7 3,900 600 8,000 8,457 -400 -4.9 1,200 400 -1,200 Franklin ...... ••• .. • -100 F:remont 3 ...... - 9,400 8,679 800 B.7 1,300 500 9,100 9,127 -100 -O.B 1,200 600 -700 Gem ...... ••••••• .. • .. ••• 9,200 9,541, -300 -3.6 900 600 -700 Gooding ...... · -1,900 Idaho ...... 13,000 13,542 -600 -4.3 2,100 700 11,700 11,672 (Z) -0.1 2,000 500 -1,500 Jefferson ...... -1,200 Jerome ...... • .. 11,400 11,712 -400 -3.0 1,400 600 31,500 29,556 2,000 6.7 3,500 2,000 500 Kootenai. •••••••••••• ••••••• .. ••••• • 123,700 21,170 2,600 12.1 2,900 1,000 700 Latah ••••• ~ ...... •• .... • .. • .. -600 Lemlli...... 5,600 5,816 -200 -4.2 800 400 -600 Lewis ...... • ...... 4,100 4,423 -400 -8.3 500 200 3,000 3,686 -700 -18.3 300 200 -800 Lincoln ...... • ... • .. • • -200 Madison ...... •• 10,200 9,417 800 8.5 1,400 400 17,100 14,394 2,700 18.7 2,600 700 700 Minidoka ...... 1,500 Nez Perce ...... 30,400 27,066 3,300 12.2 3,500 1,700 3,100 3,603 -500 -13.8 400 200 -700 Oneida ...... -500 Owyhee ...... 6,300 6,375 (Z) -0.4 900 1,00 -500 Payette ...... 12,500 12,363 100 0.9 1,300 BOO 4,900 4,111 800 20.2 600 300 500 Power ...... -2,300 Shoshone ...... 20,200 20,876 -600 -3.0 2,BOO 1,100 3,100 2,639 500 19.0 400 100 .300 Teton ...... -700 Twin Falls ...... ·...... 41,,100 41,B42 2,300 5.4 5,500 2,500 3,700 3,663 100 2.1 500 200 -200 Valley ...... ••• -100 Washington ...... 8,700 B,378 300 3.5 1,000 600 191,000 9,000 LOUISIANA ...... 3,617,000 3,25'1,022 360,000 n.o 542,000 52,000 49,931 2,100 4.1 8,600 2,800 -3,800 Acadia ...... 1,200 -900 Allen ...... 21,000 19,867 1,100 5.5 3,200 20.8 5,200 1,600 2,300 Ascension •• ~ ...... , ...... 33,700 2'1,927 5,800 3,300 1,100 -600 Assumption ...... ~ ...... 19,600 17,991 1,600 9.1

See footnotes at end of table. 8 ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960··Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change population 1%0 to 1966

State and county April 1, Net July 1, 1%0 NUlf.ber Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census) j ------

LOUISIANi--Con"tinued 5,800 2,500 500 Avoyellcs ...... ,',1,400 37,606 3,800 10.1 22,000 19,191 2,800 lA.4" 3,100 1,300 Beauregard ...... e ~ ..... ~ ...... 2,200 1,200 Bienville ...... 17,300 16,726 600 3.5 3,=,00 5.7 9,500 2,300 -3,900 BOBsier·lf ...... " ...... 60,900 57,622 1.0 33,900 13,000 -18,700 Caddo* ••••••••• : ...... 226,000 223,859 2,200 145,,,"75 -10,200 -7.0 23,800 6,100 -27,900 Calcasieu"'" ...... e ...... " ...... 135,200 9,004 600 7.1 1,100 700 100 caldwell...... • ...... ••• .. ••• .. 9,600 6,909 200 2.3 1,:LOO 300 -700 c'runeron ...... " .... " .. " 7,100 (z) 12,500 11/,21 1,100 9.2 1,800 700 Catahoula ...... -3,200 17,100 19,407 -2,300 -11.7 2,300 1,400 cJ:aiborr18 •• ~ • ~ ." ...... " . " •• " " " B " .. ", e " • ~ 900 24,000 20,467 3,500 17.3 3,900 1,300 Concordia •• """" •• " ~ •• "" e."'" e."." .. ",,· -2,300 23,700 24,248 -500 -2.2 3,600 1,800 De Soto ...... •• .... •• .. •• 16.3 37,900 10,500 10,100 Baton Rouge * ...... 1267,600 230,058 37,500 E~ast -100 -0.5 2,600 1,100 -1,600 Elast Carroll ...... 14,400 10,433 119,600 20,198 -600 -2.9 2,600 1,100 -2,100 LPast Feliciana •. " " .. " .. " " • ~ " " ~ .. " " .... " " " .. -1,800 34",000 31,639 2,400 7.5 6,200 2,000 EIvangeline ...... " ...... " ...... " ...... -3,100 25,400 26,088 -700 -2.7 4,000 1,600 Franklin.' ...... 200 14,500 13,330 1,200 9.0 1,900 1,000 Grant .... "...... "...... ".. eO" .... " .. 5,900 11.4 10,500 2,800 -1,700 I beria ...... "." ...... " ...... '" ...... 57,600 51,657 29,939 1,200 3.9 5,400 2,000 -2,200 I berville ...... • .. ••• 31,100 1,200 7.8 2,200 1,000 100 ,ack\so,n. 17,100 15,828 J b· ...... "...... ".. 80,000 38.3 4"0,700 9,200 48,500 J efferso * ...... 288,800 208,769 -1,000 -3.3 ",,800 1,600 -4,200 J effersOfl Davis ...... ••• 28,800 29,825 1103,500 84,656 18,800 22.2 16,300 3,900 6,","00 L afayette* ...... 1,100 65,000 55,381 9,700 17.5 11,100 2,600 Lafourche •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 800 900 15,DOO 13,011 2,000 15.1 1,900 L a Salle ...... • .. •••••• 1,600 4,000 1 34,700 28,535 6,100 21.5 3,700 L incoln .• ,...... • .... ••••••• .. 19.9 4,600 1,500 2,200 ivingston ...... 32,300 26,974 5,400 L 1,100 6.5 2,600 1,200 -400 Ma dison ...... •• .... •• ...... • 17,500 16,444 1,100 3.3 5,600 2,000 -2,500 Morehouse ...... ~ ...... 34,800 33,709 -1,800 136,400 35,653 800 2.2 4,800 2,200 Na tchi taches ...... -27,700 648,900 627,525 21,300 3.4 95,200 46,200 orleans* ...... · .. ·· .. · .. ·· .. . -1,600 111,400 101,663 9,700 9.5 1'7,200 5,900 Qua chita* ...... 4,300 1,000 800 1aquemines ...... 26,600 22,545 4,100 18.2 P 2.7 4,300 1,400 -2,300 Coupee ...... 23,100 22,488 600 Pointe 7,300 6.5 16,300 6,400 -2,600 pides ...... •• .... 118,600 111,351 Ra 100 1.2 1,400 700 -600 Red River ...... • .. 10,100 9,978 700 3.1 4,200 1,600 -1,900 Richland ...... 24,600 23,824 18,564 2,500 13.5 2,700 1,300 1,100 Sabine ...... •• .. • .. • .. • .... •• 21,100 9,200 45,700 32,186 13,500 42.1 5,600 1,400 st Bernard-)(- ...... • ... • .. • • 1,000 1,300 25,900 21,219 4,700 22.2 4,300 st Charles ...... ••• 500 -900 9,100 9,162 -100 -1.1 1,300 st Helena ...... ••• -1,200 19,600 18,369 1,300 6.9 3,600 1,100 St James ...... •• .. • 20.0 3,700 1,100 1,000 John the Baptist ...... 22,100 18,439 3,700 St 2,800 3.4 14,600 4,600 -7,200 St Landry ...... ••• 84,300 81,493 29,063 3,300 11.2 5,400 1,500 -600 St MarGin ...... ••• 32,JOO 2,800 59,300 48,833 10,500 21.5 10,300 2,600 st Mary ...... • .... • .. • 14,600 57,600 38,643 18,900 49.0 7,100 2,700 St Tammany* ...... • .. ••• 10,400 4,100 1,200 ngipahoa ...... 166,900 59,434 7,500 12.6 Ta -700 -6.0 1,800 800 -1,700 Tensas ...... 11,100 11,796 11,700 19.3 13,500 2,800 1,000 rrebonne ...... • .. • .. • .. • • 72,500 60,771 Te 1,200 7.0 2,600 1,200 -200 Un ior...... 18,900 17,624 38,855 2,400 6.2 6,500 2,100 -2,000 Ve rrrdlion ...... 41,300 39,200 59,100 18,301 40,800 223.0 3,100 1,4"00 Ve rnon • .••••••••••••.•••••. 0 •• ••••••• 2,800 -2,400 45,100 44,015 1,100 2.5 6,400 Wa shington ...... • -2,000 40,800 39,701 1,100 2.8 5,500 2,400 We bster ...... ·• .... • .. • .. •••••• 900 -700 16,200 14,796 1,400 9.5 3,000 We st Baton Rouge ...... 900 (z) 15,400 14,177 1,200 8.8 2,200 We at Carroll ...... •• 500 -2,000 11,300 12,395 -1,100 -9.2 1,400 We st Feliciana ...... e ...... e ...... 16,034 500 3.1 2,000' 1,100 -400 Wi nn ...... •·•••····· .. · .. • .... · .. · 16,500 8,000 0.9 137,000 68,000 -60,000 MAINE ...... • .. • .. • 978,000 969,265 2.9 12,100 6,200 -3,300 droscoggin* ...... 88,800 86,312 2,500 An -9,300 -8.7 17,800 /,,900 -22,100 oostook ...... • .... • 96,800 106,064 Ar 5.2 25,600 13,400 -2,800 berland* ...... 192,200 182,751 9,500 Cum -400 -1.7 2,900 1,500 -1,800 Franklin ...... ••• 19,700 20,069 32,293 -100 -0.4 3,900 I 2,800 -1,300 Han cock ...... •• .... • .. •• 32,200 See footnotes at end of table. 9

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

state and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Number Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census) i. ------I-.

MAINJl-~Continued 90,~.00 89,150 1,200 1.4 12,100 6,200 -4,600 K~ennebec ...... " .... " .. " .. """, .. ,, ...... •• .. 28,000 2<',5'75 -600 -2.0 3,300 2,600 -1,300 Kn ox ... ~"" .. " .. 5 ~ ~ e ...... " ...... " .. e ~ ...... 18,497 1,400 7.5 2,300 1,7DO 800 irlcoln ...... p ...... "" .. " ...... 19,900 L 3,200 -3,300 oxford ...... " ...... "..... " ...... 43,700 '.4,31+5 -700 -1.5 5,800 -1,200 -0.9 20,100 7,700 -13,500 Perlobscot ...... " ...... ,"" .... " ...... " ...... "" 1125,200 126,346 ~600 -3.6 2,100 1,~.00 -1,200 Piscataquis ...... 16,800 17,379 500 2.3 3,200 1,600 -1,000 Sagadahoc ...... • 23,300 22,793 3,300 8.3 5,400 2,900 700 S omerset ...... " ...... 43,100 39,749 -400 -1.7 3,100 1,900 -1,600 Waldo ...... •• .. •••••••• 22,300 22,632 32,908 -2,800 -8.5 3,700 2,700 -3,800 Washington ... to .. e ...... " ...... " ..... 30,100 99,402 5,800 5.8 13,300 7,500 (z) York ...... ••••••••·• 105,200 3 100 689 510 000 16.5 479 000 183 000 21~· ODO MARYLAND ...... • 3z611z000 / 2,300 2.7 10,200 6,200 -1,700 A llegany ...... 86,400 8 ,,169 206,6Y, 53,400 25.8 33,DOO 9,200 29,600 Anne Arunc\,el-x- ~ ... ~. G .. ' 9 ...... ~ .... ~ ...... 260,000 14.8 67,700 23,600 28,600 1 tinlore*;~ .... "" .. ~ ...... ~ ...... 565,100 492,428 72,700 Ba 70,100 -80,800 1 timore ·Ci ty* ...... 923,500 939,024 .15,500 -1.7 135,400 Ba 1,000 400 calvert ...... 18,300 15,826 2,500 15.7 '3,ODO 19,462 500 2.5 2,600 1,600 -500 aroline ...... D ...... " ...... 19,900 c 20.0 7,100 3,300 6,800 Ca 1'1'011* ...... • .. • .. •· 63,300 52,785 10,600 48,408 4,600 9.4 8,2DO 2,500 -1,100 Cecil * .... 0, ...... e ...... D ...... 53,000 7,000 21.6 6,700 1,800 2,100 Char1es .. ~ ...... 39,600 32,572 29,666 1,200 4.2 3,500 2,500 300 DorchesteJ;,' ...... e ...... 30,900 11,600 16.1 10,500 4,900 6,000 Fr ederick...... 83,500 71,930 1,600 7.6 2,800 1,300 100 Ca 22,000 20,420 rrett.t ...... •••·•••• 34.0 13,900 3,700 16,000 H,,·rford* ...... ·••• .. 102,800 76,722 26,lDO 12,900 35.7 6,100 1,800 8,600 Howard* ...... ,...... 49,100 36,152 15,DOO 15,481 -500 -3.0 2,100 1,200 -1,300 Ke nt ...... · ...... ••• .. ••• 51,000 14,400 62,800 Mo ntgomery* ...... • .. 440,300 340,928 99,400 29.2 55.3 76,800 15,'>00 136,200 Prinee Georges-x- ...... 555,000 357,395 197,600 1,200 -100 Qu een Annes ...... 17,500 16,.569 1,000 .5.8 2,200 3,100 8.0 8,800 1,700 -4,000 St Marys ...... · 42,000 38,915 19,623 -600 -3.3 2,300 1,800 -1,200 Somerset ...... a ...... e ...... 19,000 22,900 21,578 1,300 6.0 2,800 1,900 400 Ta Ibot ...... •••••••••• 6,000 4,100 shington ...... 101,300 91,219 10,100 11.1 12,100 Wa 3,600 2,000 cornico ...... 54,100 49,0.50 5,000 10.3 6,600 Wi 1,800 900 Wo rcester ...... 26,100 23,733 2,400 10.1 3,300 -77,000 MASSACHUSETTS ...... 25,403,000 5,148,578 254,000 4.9 690,000 359,000 8,600 281,700 70,286 11,400 16.2 8,500 5,700 Ba rnstable ..••••.•••.•••.•••• ••·•••• . 1.9 18,700 9,900 -6,100 Be rkshire* ...... · ...... 2144,800 142,135 2,700 4.3 51,100 29,600 -4,400 Bristo1* ...... ••·••••• . 2415,600 398,488 17,100 26,000 5,829 100 2.1 600 600 200 Du kes ...... •· .. ••••••••••·· 14,100 2614,900 568,831 49,000 8.1 74,700 42,800 Es sex* ...... -100 257,200 54,864 2;300 4.3 6,400 4,000 Franklin ...... • . -16,400 2441,700 429,353 12,400 2.9 57,700 28,900 Hamp den* ..... : g ...... 5,800 3,300 pshire* ...... 2112,600 103,229 9,400 9.1 11,900 Ham 6.7 174,700 78,200 -13,900 Mi ddlesex* ...... •••••· • 21,321,400 1,238,742 82,700 23,800 3,559 200 7.0 500 300 (Z) Na ntucket ...... • .. · 30,800 29,200 rfo1k* ...... 2575,900 510,256 65,700 12.9 67,300 No 38,900 18,100 33,700 ymouth* ...... 2303,000 248,449 54,500 21.9 PI 103,900 64,500 -116,400 ffolk* ...... 2714,400 791,329 -77,000 -9.7 Su 40,100 .8,500 Wo rcester* ...... 2610,100 583,228 26,800 4.6 75,500 202,000 -138,000 MINNESOTA ...... 3,572,000 3,413,864 158,000 4.6 498,000 -1.5 1,300 1,000 -600 Ai tkin ...... · .. • .. •· 12,000 12,162 -200 85,916 41,3DO 48.0 23,100 3,000 21,200 An oka~- ...... 127,200 1,800 7.5 3,400 1,600 (z) Be oker ...... 25,800 23,959 2,700 11.4 3,.500 1,600 800 Beltrami ...... • .. ••• .. 126,100 23,425 19,200 17,287 1,900 11.0 3,200 900 -400 Ben ton ...... 0 .... 1' ...... -100 -1.6 1,200 600 -700 Big stone ...... 8,800 8,954 1.50,800 44,385 6,500 1. /,6 6,200 2,600 2,800 Blue Earth ••••••••••••••• •••••••••••· 1,400 5.0 3,900 1,800 -700 BroWD ...... ". 29,100 27,676 1,500 5.2 3,900 1,600 -900 Oarlton ...... • .. • .. •· 29,400 27,932 15.6 3,400 1,200 1,200 Carver ...... 24,700 21,358 3,300 -500 -2.7 2,000 I 1,300 -1,200 Cas s ...... " .. " ...... 16,300 16,720

See footnotes at end of table .. 10 ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change} Componen-ts of change Population 1960 to 1966

State and county April 1, July 1, Net 1960 Number Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (censu.s)

MINNESOTA--ContinuerJ 1,000 lin:LppeW'J. .•••••••••••••••.••••••••••. 16,100 -200 -1.2 2,000 900 6.7 1,600 1,200 I 1t"JOO ';2,600 3,600 9.1 5,900 1,800 -600 -600 8,700 -200 -2.2 1,000 600 Clearwater." ... "." .... ~ ..... ~ .... " .. " ...... -400 3,200 -200 -4.7 500 200 Cook ••••••••••.••••• ·•••••••••••·•• . -1,700 15,JOO -800 -5.2 1,900 1,000 Cottonwood ...... -600 "33 200 1,100 .3 .1+ 1,.,000 2,300 Crow Wing .•.••••••••••••••••••••• ••· 1'1,400 108;200 29,900 38.2 16,100 3,500 Dakota* ••••••••••••••• •••••••••·••• • -800 13,1,00 200 1.'; I,SOO 800 20,900 -1,.00 -L8 2,400 I,MlO -1,300 23,685 -1,600 -6.9 2,900 1,500 Faribaul t ... ~ ...... " .. ~ .. " ... " . 22,000 23,768 -800 -3.5 2,900 1,800 FillInore ... " ...... " ~ " .. " ... ~ " • 22,900 -3.7 4,900 2,200 F:reeborn ...... " ...... " .... " ...... 36,500 37,891 -1,~00 3';,900 33,035 1,900 5.7 !~jOQO 2,400 Goodhue. • •••••••••.•••••••••••••• -400 8,800 8,870 -100 -O.B 1,000 600 Ox'arrL. • .... • ...... ~ ...... -36,800 881,800 g"2,85,, 3il,900 ~.6 123,800 48,100 16,588 600 3.5 2,400 1,000 -800 17,200 (z) 10,500 9,962 500 5.4 1,300 800 Hubbard ••••••••.•••••••••• ••••••••• • 2,900 17,000 13,530 .3 500 25.9 1,500 800 Isanti. •••••••.••••• ••••••••••••••• • -1;300 -3.5 4·,600 2,200 -3,800 Itasca ...... •••••• .... • .. •• 36,700 38,006 14,300 15,501 -1,200 -8.0 1,700 900 -2,100 J·acke,on. J ...... 600 200 Kanabec .•.••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 9,700 9,007 700 8.1 1,100 3,600 1,700 Kandiyohi ...... " ...... "28, GOO 29,987 -4.6 8,200 8,343 -2.1 900 600 Kittson.,•••.••••••••••••••• • ••• •••• • 1,100 -1,400 Koochiching ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 17,900 18,190 -300 -1.4 2,200 11,800 13,330 -1,500 -11.3 1,300 900 -1,900 Lac qui Parle ...... " ...... " .. "" .. " ... .. -2,300 12,900 13,702 -800 -6.0 2,100 600 Lake ...... • .. •• .... •· 700 300 -500 Lake of the Woods ••••••••••••••••••• 4,300 4,304 (z) -0.4 6.6 2,800 1,300 -200 Le 0ueur ... " ...... " ...... 21,200 19,906 1,300 1,100 600 -1,300 Lincoln ...... " ...... • • 8,800 9,651 -8GO -8.7 21,000 22,655 -1,600 -7.2 3,300 1,500 -3,500 ...... 600 26,600 24,401 2,200 9.2 3,200 1,500 -900 6,000 6,341 -400 -5.9 900 400 Malmomen ••••••.••.••••••••••••••• 0 •• -600 11,·,600 14,262 300 2.1 1,800 900 Marshall ••••••••••••••.••••••••••..• -3,600 25,000 26,986 -2,000 -7.3 3,100 1,500 Martin ...... •••••••· 2,400 1,300 -700 Meeker ...... 19,300 18,887 400 1.9 1,900 1,200 -100 Mille Lacs ...... 15,200 14,560 600 4.4 4,000 1,500 -2,700 Morrison ...... • ...... • .... . 26,400 26,641 -200 -0.7 -6.7 6,000 2,400 -6,800 Mower ...... •• • 45,200 48,498 -3,300 -5.1 2,000 700 -2,000 Murray ...... ••• Ii" 000 14,743 -800 -2,700 22 23,196 -700 -3.1 3,000 1,000 Nicollet ...... •• .. • .... •• • " ,500 -2,800 22,500 23,365 -900 -3.7 3,100 1,200 Nobles ...... •••••••• • -900 10,700 11,253 -600 -5.1 1,200 800 Norman ...... -1,600 "72,800 65,532 7,300 11.1 12,000 3,100 Olmsted ...... -4,100 "46,900 48,960 -2,000 -4.1 5,300 3,200 Otter Tail .... •••••••••• .. •••••••• .. 1,500 800 -1,400 Pennington •••.•••••••••••••••••••••• 11,800 12,468 -600 -5.2 1,900 1,200 -800 Pine ...... 16,900 17,004 -100 -0.8 12,600 13,605 -1,OGO -7.3 1,800 800 -1,900 Pipestone ...... -2,200 36,600 36,182 400 1.2 5,000 2,400 Polk •••••••••••••••••• •••••••• •••••• 1,200 800 -l,~.oo Pope •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 11,000 11,91~. -900 -7.7 -32,600 431,500 422,525 9,000 2.1 66,4D0 24,800 Ramsey·* ...... 400 -700 5,500 5,830 -300 -5.6 800 Red Lake •••••••••••• •••••••••••••••• -2,700 20,700 21,718 -1,000 -4.8 3,000 1,300 Redwood ••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••• • -500 -2.2 2,800 1,500 -1,900 Renville .•••..••••••••••••• •••••••• • 22,700 23,249 139 900 38,988 900 2.4 4,800 2,100 -1,700 Rice ...... • .... •• .. •• .. • .. -1,700 11;100 11,864 -800 -6.5 1,500 600 Rock ..•••••••••••.•••• ••••••••••••• • -1,900 11,200 12,154 -1,000 -8.0 1,700 800 Roseau ...... "' .. .. -19,400 225,000 231,588 -6,600 -2.8 28,',00 15,600 St. Louis* ...... 600 25,800 21,909 3,900 17.8 1+,600 1,300 Scott ••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••• • 18.3 2,000 800 1,100 Sherblirne ...... " " • " .. " " .• " 15,200 12,861 2,400 -1,600 15,700 16,228 -500 -3.2 2,100 1,000 Sibley ••••.••.•.•••••••••••••• ·•·•· • 400 "90,400 80,345 10,100 12.5 13 700 4,000 Stearns. e .. " ...... " •••• ··" .. • .... " .. ·"",,· 100 27,400 25,029 2,300 9.3 3; 700 1,400 Steele ...... -1,200 11,000 11,262 -300 -2.5 1,500 600 Stevens ...... 1,000 -1,600 14,100 l~, 936 -800 -5.4 1,700 Swift ...... ••••••••••·• . -800 -3.6 2,900 1,600 -2,200 Todd ...... ••••• .... ••• 22,300 23,119 See footnotes at end of table. 11

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asteris]( (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

State and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Number Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census) ---1------f----- f------+------+------+-----

900 500 -900 Traverse ...... 7,100 7,503 -400 -4.8 2,300 1,200 -1,700 Wabasha ...... 16,~OO 17,007 ··700 -3.8 100 1.0 2,000 800 -1,000 Wadena •...... ·········• . 12,300 12,199 15,300 16,0,>1 -SOO -4.7 2,100 1,000 -l,BOO Waseca •••••.••••••••••••••• ·•••••••• • 10,400 2,500 6,500 Washington'- ...... 66,800 52,432 11,,300 27.3 ( 14,460 -800 -5.6 1,700 900 -1,600 Watonwan .•...•. ~ .•...... •.•..•...•• 13,600 » 10,000 10,650 -600 -5.8 1,1.t()0 600 -1,400 WIlkin ...... •...... ·············· . -600 143 ,000 1'{},937 2,100 5.2 5,300 2,600 Winona ••...... •..•... ··············• . 1+,700 2,000 1,000 Wright ...... 33,700 29,935 3,700 12.5 -200 -1.3 1,flOO 1,000 -1,000 Yellow Medicine •...... ·········•· 15,300 15,523 NEW HAMPSHIRE •...•...... 1-___,::.6.:..76"-'- ,"'0,::.0,::.0+-___,::.606,921 69,000 Il.I, f--___ --'fl::.::6..:.., 0"-,0::;0+ .. ___.:4';:.:31'-.,, O::.,:0:..::..j0 ____ -=.27"-',C-:0=00 Bel1map...... 31,300 28,912 2,400 8.4 3,800 2,300 800 CarrolL...... 17,300 15,829 1,500 9.5 1,800 1,500 1,200 Cheshire ... ;...... 47,600 1,3,342 4,200 9.8 5,900 3,000 1,300 Coos...... 35,700 37,140 -1,1,00 -3.7 1.,300 2,700 -2,900 Grafton...... 50,400 48,857 1,600 3.2 6,000 3,600 -800 llillsborough*...... • ...... 209,100 178,161 30,900 17.4 27,100 12,900 16,BOO Merrimack ...... ,...... 174,700 67,7B5 6,900 10.2 8,700 5,200 3,400 Rockingham ...... 115,900 99,029 16,800 17.0 15,700 6,300 7,500 Strafford...... 164,900 59,799 5,100 8.6 8,800 4,000 300 Su1ltva;n .../ ...... _...... 29,300 28,067 1,300 4.5 3,500 2,100 -200

NEW JERsEY ••.••....•.••...... •.•• ~ ___6~,~8_9~9~,_00_0-+ _____6~,0_6_6.:,_7~8~24- _____8_3_2~,00 __ 04- ____1_3_._74- ____8_2_0~,_00_0-+ ____3_9_3~,~O_0_04_----4D--5~,0-0-0 Atlantic'- ...... 181,800 160,880 20,900 13.0 19,600 14,500 15,800 Bergen*...... 865,700 780,255 85,400 11.0 91,200 42,300 36,600 Burlington'...... 291,200 224,499 66,700 29.7 36,300 10,800 41,100 Camden*...... 441,100 392,035 49,100 12.5 56,200 24,500 17,400 Cape May...... 56,300 48,555 7,700 15.9 5,900 5,100 7,000 Cumberland*...... 124,100 106,850 17,300 16.2 15,900 7,600 (i,900 Essex* ...... 978,700 923,545 55,200 6.0 122,000 67,300 500 Gloucester*...... •...... • 155,800 134,840 20,900· 15.5 20,300 8,100 B,800 Hudson*...... 618,600 610,734 7,900 1.3 78,600 46,300 -24,400 Hunterdon...... 63,400 54,107 9,200 17.1 7,000 3,800 6,000 Mercer*...... 300,400 266,392 34,000 12.8 35,000 17,400 16,400 Middlesex*...... 519,600 433,856 85,800 19.8 64,000 21,900 43,700 Monmouth...... 411,4·00 33/.,401 77,000 23.0 50,100 23,400 50,300 Morris*...... •....•....•.•..•.....•• 345,900 261,620 84,300 32.2 37,900 14,200 60,600 Ocean...... 159,500 108,241 51,200 47.3 19,600 9,500 41,100 Passaic*...... 451,000 406,61S 44,400 10.9 54,300 26,900 17,000 Salew...... 62,700 5S,711 4,000 6.8 8,200 3,900 -400 Somerset*...... 186,000 143,913 42,000 29.2 21,200 7,200 2B,100 Sussex...... 6B,800 49,255 19,600 39.7 7,800 3,500 15,300 Union'...... 545,BOO 504,255 1.1,500 8.2 61,000 29,500 10,000 Warren*...... 71,400 63,220 8,200 12.9 8,000 4,BOO 5,000

NORTH CAROLINA •.•...... f.-._.::4c:,.:.9.:;74:::,:,c::O::::0::;:0-l-_-=:4!.c,5:::5:,:;6:.:,;::1:::.55::..t-__..::4::::1.:..7;,;,0:,:;0::;:04- __:::.9.:.:.2=+_.....::6:..:.7.::5.!.:,0:::0::::0+_.....::2:::::48~,0::::0::::0+_...:.;-1::::0::.:,::::0::::::.00 Alamance...... 94,000 85,674 8,300 9.7 12,400 4,200 200 Alexander...... 17,800 15,625 2,200 14.1 2,000 800 1,000 Alleghany ...... ,'.. .. 8,200 7,734 400 5.6 900 500 100 Anson...... 24,400 24,962 -600 -2.2 3,300 1,600 -2,300 Ashe...... 20,400 19,768 600 3.2 2,500 1,200 -700 Avery...... 12,900 12,009 900 7.6 1,600 700 (z) Beaufort...... 236,200 36,014 200 0.5 4,800 2,400 -2,200 Ber.hie...... 24,400 24,350 (Z) 0.2 3,300 1,500 -l,BOO Bladen...... 226,500 28,881 -2,400 -B.1 3,800 1,700 -4,500 Brunswick*...... • 20,900 20,278 700 3.3 3,000 1,200 -1,100 Buncombe*...... 144,400 130,074 14,300 11.0 16,800 8,600 6,100 Burke...... 61,400 52,701 8,700 16.4 6,500 2,400 4,500 CabarruB...... 72,700 6fl,137 4,600 6.8 8,700 3,600 -500 Caldwell...... 57,200 49,552 7,700 15.5 7,900 2,600 2,300 Camden...... 25,400 5,598 -200 -3.9 800 300 -700 Carteret...... 36,300 30,940 5,400 17.4 3,900 1,600 3,100 Caswell...... 19,600 19,912 -300 -1.4 2,500 1,100 -1,700 Catawba...... 86,500 73,191 13,300 18.2 11,000 3,700 6,000 Chatham...... 27,900 26,785 1,100 4.0 3,300 1,500 -700 Cherokee...... 16,200 16,335 -100 -0.8 1,900 I 1,000 -1,000 12 ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1,1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

State, and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Nwr,ber Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census) --

NORTH CAROLlNA--Continued 700 11,600 11,729 -100 -1.0 1,600 "1,000 Chowan ...... •• 300 -600 5,200 5,526 -300 -5.3 600 Clay ...... •••••• 9,800 3,600 -2/,00 Cleveland ...... 269,900 66,048 3,800 5.8 7,500 2,800 -'t, 100 Columbus ...... 49,500 48,973 500 1.1 58,773 4,500 7.7 11,500 2,900 -4,100 Craven ...... ••• .. 63,300 17,200 / 148,418 4.6,200 31.1 31,,500 5,600 Cumber1and* ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 19 +,600 200 7,000 6,601 400 6.4 700 500 Ourrituck ...... 500 600 6,800 5,935 900 14.9 800 Dare ... ,. ~ ..... G .... e .... G ...... G ...... ~ 7,500 94,300 79,493 M,800 18.6 3,900 DavidBon~ ...... ~ .. " ...... 0 ...... ~ .. l~,~~~ 900 300 Davie ...... 18,200 16,728 1,500 8.9 40,270 -2,300 -5.6 5,SOO 2,1,00 -5,400 Duplin ...... 238,000 2,600 123,600 111,995 11,600 10.3 I5,500 6,500 Durham* ...... ••·• .. • 8,300 3,200 -5,90Cl Edgecombe ...... 53,400 5/,,226 -800 -1.5 189,428 20,000 10.6 27,500 10,300 2,800 Forsyth*. , ...... 209,400 -2,800 28,000 28,755 -800 -2.7 3,800 1,700 Franklin ...... 6,400 -3,700 2137,000 127,074 10,000 7.8 20,100 Gaston ...... • .. • 1,200 600 -400 Gates •••• ·...... •• 9,400 9,254 200 1.7 500 8.1 900 300 -100 Graham .••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••• 7,000 6,~32 400 36,000 33,110 2,800 8.6 4,300 1,800 Granville ...... ; •• 2,500 800 -1,900 Greene .....,...... 16,.500 16,741 -300 -1.6 24,800 10.1 36,000 12,500 1,300 Gunford*i...... 2271,300 246,520 2,000 3.3 9,000 3,500 -3,600 Ha1ifax ••• ...... ••••• .. ••• 60,900 58,956 48,236 1,100 2.2 7,000 2,800 -3,000 Harnett ...... • .... · .... •• .... • 249,300 -600 39,711 2,600 6.6 5,400 2,100 Haywood.·~ ...... •• 42,400 36,163 5,000 13.9 4,700 2,400 2,700 enderson ...... e ...... 41,200 H 800 3;7 3,500 1,300 -1,400 Heriford ...... • •• ••••••• • 23,600 22,718 16,356 1,400 8.6 2,500 800 -300 Hoke ...... •• .... • 17,800 -500 25,500 5,765 -300 -5.3 600 500 Hyde ...... 9,200 3,600 2,300 redell ...... ;· ...... ·· ...... 70,400 62,526 7,800 12.5 I 1,400 8.1 2,100 1,000 300 J ackson ...... 119,200 17,780 -5,800 260,900 62,936 -2,000 -3.2 7,600 3,800 ,T ohnston ...... • 1,500 600 -1,800 ones ...... 210,200 11,005 -800 -7.4 J 2,800 10.5 4,300 1,600 (Z) L ee ...... 229,400 26,561 57,400 55,276 2,100 3.8 8,000 3,000 ~2,900 L eno)..r ...... e- ...... " ...... 100 28,814 2,400 8.2 3,900 1,600 L inco1n ...... 31,200 800 30,000 26,742 3,200 12.1 3,900 1,400 McDowe11 ...... • .. • ...... • -400 -2.7 1,600 800 -1,200 Ma con ...... ··•·•·•·•••• .. · 14,500 14,935 17,217 -200 -1.3 1,700 1,000 -1,000 Ma dison •••••••••••• • ••• •••••••••••• • 17,000 -3,900 225,600 27,139 -1,500 -5.6 3,900 1,500 Ma rtin ...... ,." ...... e ...... ,. .. ~" ...... 272,111 49,400 lS.2 1,3,100 13,700 20,000 Mecklenburg* ...... ~ ...... 321,500 13,906 -900 -6.5 1,600 800 -1,700 Mi·tche11...... ••• .. •••• 13,000 200 18,408 1,600 8.6 2,500 1,200 Montgomery •••••••••••••••• • ••• ••••• • 20,000 -600 36,733 2,500 6.7 5,500 2,400 Moore ...... e ...... 39,200 61,002 2,900 4.7 8,600 3,500 -2,200 Nash ...... 63,900 -2,300 74,500 71,742 2,700 3.8 9,700 4,700 New Hanove:b* ...... It .. 26,811 -1,900 -7.1 3,900 1,600 -4,200 Northampton ...... 24,900 82,706 19,400 23.5 19,800 2,400 2,000 onslow ...... "...... 102,100 5,300 152,800 42,970 9,800 22.9 6,400 1,800 range* ...... "...... 1,100 600 -1,200 ico ...... 9,100 9,850 -700 -7.5 °Parol 2,200 8.4 3,900 1,600 -100 Fasquotank ...... • 27,800 25,630 -2,500 2 ,300 18,508 -1,200 -6.3 2,400 1,100 Pender ..... "...... "...... 17 -1,100 28,600 9,178 -600 -6.0 1,100 500 Pe rqui:rna.ns ...... -600 28,200 26,394 1,SOO 6.8 3,800 1,400 Pe rson ...... e ...... -600 175,900 69,942 6,000 8.6 10,500 3,900 Pi·tt ...... ·······;···· 700 -300 11,600 11,395 200 1.7 1,200 Po lk ...... ••• .... ••• 3,000 3,600 70,100 61,497 8,600 14.0 8,000 Ra ndo1ph* ...... ••••• 400 1.0 5,700 2,'700 -2,700 R:t'chmond ...... 239,600 39,202 89,102 600 0.6 15,300 5,100 -9,600 beson ...... 1>\10 ...... 89,700 Ro 2,300 3.3 10,000 3,800 -3,900 Ro ckingham ...... •••• 271,900 69,629 82,817 6,400 7.7 10,200 4,400 700 Ro wan ...... •••·••••••••••••• .. 89,200 2,800 6.2 5,700 2,600 -200 Ru therford ...... • 47,900 45,09l 48,013 2,100 4.4 6,200 2,900 -1,200 Samp son ...... ·• .. •· .. · 50,100 -800 26,800 25,183 1,600 6.3 3,900 1,500 Sc otland ...... • .. •• .. •••• 2,700 6.7 5,100 2,200 -200 stanly ...... ••• 43,600 40,873 22,314 1,400 6.3 2,800 1,100 -300 okes ••••• ~ ...... • .... 23,700 St 4,400 9.2 6,600 2,700 500 Surry ...... 52,600 48,205 I See footnotes at end of table. 13

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960··Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

State and county April 1, July 1, Net 1960 Number Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census) _~~ ______< ______< ______~ ______-+ ______r----<-----'------~------

NOR'l'H CAROLINA--Continued 8,387 (2) 0.3 1,300 500 -700 Swain .••• ~ •. a 0 ...... " ... ~ ...... , .. 8,400 19,200 16,372 2,800 17.1 2,800 800 800 Transylvania ...... " ..... " ...... " ~ ..... ~ .. 300 -800 Tyrrell ...... 4,000 4,520 -600 -12.4 600 2,600 -100 Urlion1(" ...... " ...... " .. 248,800 44,670 1,,100 9.3 6,900 32,002 2,200 7.0 4,900 2,000 -700 Varlce ...... 0 ••••• "" ...... 34,200 e. 169,082 32,500 19.2 25,500 8,700 15,800 Wake7(· ...... eo ...... e ...... " .. • 2201,600 19,652 -2,200 -11.0 2,600 1,300 -3,500 Warren •..••••• o ...... " ...... ~ ... 217,500 800 -800 Washington ...... 214,100 13,488 600 4.2 2,100 120,600 17,529 3,100 17.5 2,300 900 1,700 Watauga ...... -2,800 Wayne ...... 89,500 82,059 7,500 9.1 14,400 4,200 2,1,00 1,800 Wilkes ...... 50,900 45,269 5,600 12.4 6,200 3,2,.00 -2,400 Wilson ...... " ...... 60,500 57,716 2,800 4.9 8,700 1,200 -300 yadldn* ...... 24,100 22,804 1,300 5.8 2,900 1/,,600 14,008 'i00 4.1, 1,600 800 -200 Yancey ..... < ...... " ...... " .. " • OKLAHOMA ...... 1-_.::2.!.,.::4:...T:..:7,:..:0.::0_0+_.::2~,c::3.::2.::8!:-,2.::8:...4+ __=14.::8::.!,:..:0-=0.::0+ __.::6=.4.:..f._.-:3:.:0:.:2,!..,0.:.0::0+_-.::1:.:.49:...,~0:.:0:.:0+ ___-.:82''::0.:.00:.. 14,800 13,112 1,700 12.7 2,000 1,100 800 Adair •••• 0 ...... 0 ..... ~ ...... Alfalfa ...... • 8,800 8,445 400 4.6 700 700 500 Atoka ...... 10,400 10,352 (Z) (Z) 1,100 800 -300 Beaver ...... •· 6,800 6,965 -200 -2.7 600 400 -2,00 BecklW.rn·· , ...... 16,300 17,782 -1,500 -8.3 2,000 1,400 -2,100 Blaine ... ; ...... 12,100 12,077 (2) 0.3 1,400 1,100 -300 Bryan .•.• : ...... 25,200 24,252 900 3.8 2,500 2,000 400 Caddo ...... •• 30,200 28,621 1,600 5.5 3,900 2,100 -200 Canadianll ...... 30,300 24,727 5,600 22.6 3,100 1,600 4,100 Carter ...... 37,800 39,044 -1,300 -3.3 4,400 3,000 -2,800 Cherokee ...... 122,600 17,762 4,800 27.2 2,500 1,200 3,600 16,300 15,637 700 4.2 1,800 1,500 400 Choctaw •••••• '0" • o ...... 4,400 4,496 -100 -l.3 500 200 -2,.00 Cimarron. 0 ...... i ...... Cleveland·· ...... 172,600 47,600 25,000 52.4 7,700 2,100 19,300 Coal...... 5,900 5,546 400 6.9 400 500 500 105,200 90,803 14,400 15.9 17,800 3,400 (z) Comanche* ... 0 .... , ...... < ... . Cotton ...... 6,800 8,031 -1,200 -15.2 700 600 -1,400 Craig ...... 115,300 16,303 -1,000 -5.9 1,400 1,300 -l.100 Creek* ...... • • 43,200 40,495 2,700 6.7 4,700 3,000 1;000 Custer ...... 122,100 21,040 1,100 5.1 2,900 1,300 -500 16,500 13,198 3,300 25.1 1,500 1,000 2,800 Delaware ...... e .... e ..... e .. . 6,300 6,051 200 4.0 600 500 100 Dewey ...... e ...... • ..... •• Ellis ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• • 5,800 5,457 400 6.9 400 400 400 Garfield ...... 55,000 52,975 2,000 3.8 7,000 3,400 -1,600 Garvin ...... ••• 27,500 28,290 -800 -2.7 3,100 1,800 -2,000 Grady ...... 29,500 29,590 -100 -0.4 3,200 2,200 -1,200 Grant ...... • 7,600 8,140 -500 -6.6 600 700 -500 Greer ...... • ..... •• 8,900 8,877 (Z) 0.5 900 800 (z) 5,400 5,852 -400 -7.5 700 500 -700 Harmon ••••• ~ ...... Harper ...... 5,100 5,956 -900 -14.8 600 400 -1,100 Haske1l...... 9,700 9,121 600 6.8 1,100 700 200 Hughes ...... 14,800 15,144 -300 -2.2 1,400 1,400 -300 Jackson ...... 2B,600 29,736 -1,200 -3.9 6,200 1,500 -5,900 Jefferson .... ., ...... 7,500 8,192 -700 -7.9 700 BOO -600 Johnston ...... 9,100 8,517 500 6.4 800 700 400 Kay ...... 48,500 51,042 -2,500 -4.9 5,600 3,300 -4,800 Kingfisher ...... 13,700 10,635 3,100 29.3 1,500 800 2,400 12,,200 14,825 -600 -4.3 1,900 1,200 -1,300 Kiowa ...... D .. " ...... e" .. .. Latimer ...... 8,600 7,738 900 n.5 800 500 700 Le Flore·' ...... 32,200 29,106 3,100 10.6 3,600 2,300 1,800 Lincoln .•••.•••.••••••••••••..•.••••. 20,100 18,783 1,300 6.9 2,000 1,600 800 Logan ...... 17,500 18,662 -1,200 -6.:3 2,000 1,800 -1,400 Love ...... " ...... 6,500 5,862 600 10.1 600 400 400 McClain ...... 12,900 12,740 100 1.0 1,400 800 -500 McCurtain ...... • ...... 29,100 25,851 3,200 12.5 3,600 1,900 1,500 McIntosh ...... · •••••. 12,800 12,371 400 3.2 1,500 900 -100 Major ...... 7,900 7,808 100 l.6 700 600 (z) lfJarshall ..••••.••••.•..•••••..•.••••. 7,500 7,263 200 2.8 700 600 100 Mayes ...... 22,800 20,073 2,800 13.8 2,300 1,500 1,900 Murray ...... 11,500 10,622 900 8.6 1,000 1,000 900

See footnotes at end of table .. 14 ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

Stat~ and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Nurr.ber percent Births Deaths migra'tion 1966 ____----"- ______-I- ______c------(census)__. ____ .I-- ___._. _____ +__ --1------1------

OKLAHOMA--Continued '/,400 4,700 -2,500 Muskogee ...... 62,100 61,866 200 0.3 -500 _2.. 7 1,100 800 -800 Noble ...... · .. ···•· .•.•.. 9,900 10,376 el,500 -13.8 1,100 800 -1,'100 Nowata •.•...... •..•...... · .. ···· .• 9,400 10,848 11,706 100 0.8 1,400 1,000 -300 Okfuskee ...... ·· ..• ··.······ • ll,eee -1,100 439,506 4/" 100 10.0 68,700 23,500 Oklahoma·· ...... 483,600 -1,700 36, 9t'~5 -400 -1.2 4,300 2,900 Okmulgee •...... •....• · .. ····· • 36,500 1,900 -3,800 29,700 32,4/.1 -2,700 -8.5 2,900 Osage* .•....•...... •..... · ... ··· •• 2,400 1,300 30,200 28,301 1,900 6.8 3,000 ottawa 0 ••••••••••••• ~ ~. ~ ••••••••••••• 1,000 300 11,200 10,$8!, 300 2.5 1,000 Pawnee ...... ···.·•··•······ • 1.1 5,600 2,300 -2,900 Payne •...... •...... ···· ...... • 14';,700 41.,231 500 2,700 4,400 39,900 34,360 5,600 16.2 3,900 Pittsburg ...... ••... : .••• .3,000 2,100 Pontotoc ...... •...... 25,900 28,089 -2,200 -7.7 1.L~ 4,600 3,000 Pottawatomie ...... •. 42,000 tI1,4$6 600 J.,OOO sOO 900 Pushmatah":; ...... •...... 10,200 9,088 1,100 11.7 5,090 100 2.8 500 300 (z) Roger 'kllls ...... 5,200 2,900 20,614 4,000 19.5 2,500 1,500 Rogers ...... •...... •...... 24,600 -2,800 26,400 28,066 -1,700 -6.0 3,200 2,000 Seminole. ; ...... 2,800 1,300 2,000 Sequoyah* •.... ; ..•.•.....•...••....•• 21,500 18,001 3,500 19.4 -2.6 3,800 2,300 -2,500 Stephens ...... •.. ······• •. 37,000 37,990 -1,000 700 4.8 2,000 800 -500 Texas ...... ····•·•···•· .. . 14,800 14,162 1,100 -1,200 14,400 14,654 -300 -2.1 2,000 TillnJm' •• I...... -5,700 368,200 346,038 22,100 6.4 46,100 18,300 Tulsa* ... : ...... · .. · ...... 1,000 400 16,900 15,673 1,200 8.0 1,900 Wagoner •...... •.... ···· •• 4,900 2,200 -3,200 Washingttm •....•••.•...... •.••••..••• 41,900 1,2,347 -500 -1.1 18,121 1,100 6.1 2,700 1,000 -600 Washita ...... 19,200 1,100 1l,932 1,500 12.2 1,200 900 Woods ••.•.••...... • ······•·•·····• • 13,400 1,000 13,902 1,800 12.9 1,700 900 Woodward •.•••.•....•... ·.··•••·•·•·• • 15,700 PENNSYLVANIA...... 1l,60l,000 11,319,366 281,000 2.5 1,396,000 773,000 -342,000 Adams* ••...... •.•.....•.•...... r-----~5-4~,-0-00-+----~-5-1~,-9-0-6+------2~,1-0-0~-----4-.-14---~--7~,-3-00-+------3~,1-0-04------2~,-00--0 Allegheny*...... 1,600 600 1,628,587 -28,000 -L7 191,200 109,100 -110,000 Armstrong...... 77,000 79,524 -2,500 -3.1 8,900 5,200 -6,300 Beaver*...... 202,500 206,948 -4,400 -2.1 25,000 1l,500 -17,900 Bedford...... 44,200 42,451 1,800 4.1 5,700 2,800 -1,200 Berks*...... 288,500 275,414 13,100 4.8 31,400 19,700 1,500 Blair*...... 137,400 137,270 100 0.1 16,300 10,700 -5,600 Bradford...... 55,800 54,925 900 1.6 8,000 4,000 -3,100 Bucks*...... 3'55,000 308,567 46,400 15.0 46,200 14,100 14,300 Butler...... 119,200 114,639 4,600 4.0 15,200 7,000 -3,700 Cambria*...... 191,500 203,283 -11,700 -5.8 22,400 13,600 -20,500 Cameron...... 6,700 7,586 -900 -11.6 900 500 -1,400 Carbon...... 51,000 52,889 -1,900 -3.5 5,200 4,200 -2,800 Centre...... 193,000 78,580 14,400 18.3 10,700 3,700 7,400 Chester...... 253,500 210,608 42,900 20.4 29,900 12,500 25,500 Clarion ... :...... 139,600 37,408 2,200 5.8 4,800 2,400 -200 Clearfield...... 76,300 81,534 -5,200 -6.4 10,000 5,700 -9,500 Gl:inton...... 38,000 37,619 400 0.9 4,600 2,500 -1,800 Columbia...... 56,300 53,489 2,900 5.3 6,000 4,100 1,000 Crawford...... 79,300 77,956 1,400 1.8 9,300 5,700 -2,300 Cumber1and*...... 139,300 124,816 14,500 11.6 16,500 7,200 5,100 Dauph:in*...... •.•..•...... •• 225,100 220,255 4,900 2.2 27,500 15,600 -7,000 Delaware*...... 588,400 553,154 35,200 6.4 72,000 31,500 -5,300 Elk...... 37,900 37,328 500 1.4 5,800 2,400 -2,900 Erie*...... 254,800 250,682 4,100 1.6 34,100 16,100 -13,900 Fayette...... 160,600 169,340 -8,800 -5.2 1B,700 12,500 -15,000 Forest...... 4,700 4,485 200 4.7 500 400 (z! Franklin...... 96,000 8B,172 7,900 B.9 12,000 5,500 1,400 Fulton...... 11,000 10,597 400 4.2 1,400 700 -300 Greene ...... :...... 39,200 39, 42L. -200 -0.6 3,800 3,000 -1,100

4,BOO 2,800 -2,500 Huntingdon •.•..•.•..•...... •.•.•••• 39,000 39,457 -500 -1.2 -900 -1.2 9,200 4,900 -5,100 Indiana ...... •.. · .. ·•·······• • 174,500 75,366 43,600 46,792 -3,200 -6.9 5, L.oO 3,500 -5,100 Jefferson ••..•.•..•... ··.•· •••••• •• •• 2,100 1,000 -300 Juniata •.•...•..•...... · ...• ·· • 16,600 15,874 700 4.7 23,700 20,000 -13,000 Lackawanna" ...... 225,300 234,531 -9,300 -4,0 16,700 -6,100 Lancaster* ...... 293,400 278,359 15,000 5.4 37,800 12,200 7,300 -8,400 l.a.vr.rence •••••.••.••.•...•.•• •· ••• ••• • 109,500 112,965 -3,400 -3.1 See footnotes at end of table. 15 ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1,1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960··Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates'metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Population Components of change 1960 to 1966 State and county April 1, July 1, Net 1960 Nurr.ber Percent Births Deaths 1966 migration (census) ------7---~----.--- +-----+---- PENNSYLVANI~--Continued lEbanon ...... •...... •..• 93,800 3,000 3.3 12".00 6,000 -3,400 Lehigh*' ...... • , .•. , ..• , •..•. 240,000 12,500 5.5 26,500 14,800 800 Luzerne-x-, •..•.•.••...... ••...•....••• 341,600 -5,400 -1 . .5 34,600 28,100 113,1.00 4,000 3.7 11, ,700 7,800 53,300 -1,300 -2.3 6,800 1.,000 Mercer .•..•...•..••....•...... •.... 126,100 -1,1.00 -1.1 14,900 8,200 Mifflin ...... • , ..... , ..... , ....•.... IfI. ,700 300 0.8 5,800 3,000 Monroe ...... •...... •... 1,3 ,800 1.,300 10.8 1.,800 2,900 Montgomery* ...•.....•.•...... 588,600 71,900 13.9 63,000 30,100 MontoUI' ...... •...••.•...... 17,300 500 3.1 1,900 1,100 Northampton*' ...... •...••...... 208,300 201,412 6,900 3.4 22,000 13 ,400 Northumberland •...... •...... 101,000 104 138 -3,100 -3.0 11,100 8,400 Perry"' ...... •.•....•.....•. 26,700 26;582 100 0.5 3,400 1,800 Philadelphia" ....•...... •...... •. 2,042,400 2,002,512 39,900 2.0 269 300 157,200 Pike .... '" •...... •.... '" ...... 10,000 9,158 800 9.3 1;000 SiOO Potter ..... i ...... •..... 16,200 16,483 -300 -1.9 2,100 1,300 -1,200 SchuYlkill. ...•...... •.....••••.. 162,200 173,027 -10,900 -6.3 16,800 14,800 -12,900 Snyder ..•....•...... ••. 29,200 25,922 3,300 12.7 3,200 1,600 1,700 Somerset* ...... 76,100 77,450 -1,300 -1.7 8,600 5,500 -4,400 Sullivan .•....•••.•••...... •.. 5,600 6,251 -700 -11.1 700 500 -900 Susquehanna* •..•.•.•...• , •••..•.•.•.• 32,700 33,137 -400 -1.2 1.,300 2,400 -2,300 37,300 36,614 700 1.8 5,100 2,600 -1,800 J;~;~::: :: :,~ :: : :: :: :: ::: :: : :: :: :: :: :: 27,600 25,(,4,6 1,900 7.6 2,900 1,700 700 Venango •••. ,: ...... •.. 0 ••••••••••••••• 63,100 65 ,~95 -2,200 -3.3 7,500 4,900 -4,800 Warren .••.." •.•....••.•.••••.•••...•.. 149,000 45,582 3,400 7.5 5,500 3,200 1,100

Washington;! 0 0 •••••••••••••••••••••••• 212 400 217,271 -4,800 -2.2 23,500 14,400 -13,900 Wayne ..•..•..•..••..•.•.•..•...•••.•. 28;700 28,237 400 1.5 3,200 2,300 -400 WestUlOreland* . _ ...... 359,600 352,629 7,000 2.0 41,300 21,300 -13,000 Wyoming ..•...... •••..•.•...•...... • 17,900 16,813 1,100 6.6 1,900 1,300 600 York* .••••••.••••••.••••••••••••.•••• 253,700 238,336 15,300 6.4 30,900 14,800 -800

RHODE ISIJlND. 0 • 0 •••••••• 0 •••••••• 2898,000 859,488 38,000 4.5 112,000 58,000 -16,000 Bristol* .....•...... ••... 242,300 37,146 5,100 13.8 4,900 2,100 2,400 Kent* .•••.••.••••••.•..••....•.• , ..•• 2131,400 112.619 18,800 16.7 15,400 6,600 10,000 Newport ...... 282,800 81;891 900 1.1 12,400 4,000 -7,400 Providence;; ••.•••••••...•...•••..•.•. 2568,500 568,778 -300 (Z) 69,800 41,500 -28,500 Washington ...••.•.••••...... •••••. 272,900 59,054 13,800 23.4 10,000 3,400 7,300

VERMONT ...... 411,000 389,881 21,000 5.5 55,000 28,000 -6,000 Addison .....•.•.•••.••.•.••..•••.•.•• 21,100 20,076 1,000 4.9 2,700 1,300 -400 Bennington •....••..•...•...... •...•.. 27,700 25,088 2,600 10.3 3,700 2,000 900 Caledonia ..•.••••.••••.•....•.•..••.• 21,500 22,786 -1,300 -5.6 2,800 1,800 -2,300 Chittenden .•...... •.•.•.•...•.•••.. 185,700 74,425 11,300 15.1 12,600 4,200 2,900 Essex •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 5,200 6,083 -900 -14.0 800 400 -1,200 Franklin ...... 28,200 29,474 -1,200 -4.2 4,200 2,200 -3,300

Grand Isle. 'cO ." ...... 3,200 2,927 300 10.8 400 300 200 Lamoille ...... 12,100 11,027 1,100 10.1 1,700 800 200 Orange .•...•...•••••...•.••.••.••.... 17,100 16,014 1,000 6.5 2,100 1,200 200 Orleans ...... ; ...... 19,300 20,143 -900 -4.2 2,800 1,500 -2,200 Rutland ••.•.••.•.•...•.•.•...•.•..... 48,800 46,719 2,100 4.5 6,300 3,900 -300 Washington •..•.•.•.••....•..••..•.••• 44,800 42,860 1,900 4.5 6,000 2,800 -1,200 Windham ••.• '••..•.•.•.••.....•.•...••. 32,100 29,776 2,300 7.8 3,800 2,300 800 Windsor •.••••••••.•.••••.•.•.•••••••• 44,400 42,483 1,900 4.5 5,400 2,900 -600 i VIRGINIA •.•••.••.•...••.••...•.•. 4,465,000 43,966,949 4498,000 +12.6 595,000 224,000 4126,000 Accomack ..•••••••••.••.•••••••••••.•• 30,300 30,635 -400 -1.1 4,000 2,900 -1,400 5 I A1bemar1e ..••••••...•...... •.••.•.• 171,100 60,396 10,700 17.8 9,300 3,900 5,400 Alleghany6 ....•.•.•...••.•.•..••...•• 29,600 28,458 1,100 3.9 3,600 1,900 -500 """ Amelia •....•..•...... •...•••..•• 7,300 7,815 -500 -6.5 900 500 -900 Amherst* •...... •...... •.. 126,900 22,953 4,000 17.2 2,700 1,300 2,500 Appomattox .•.•...... •••..•...•..••••. 9,800 9,148 600 6.8 1,200 600 (z) Arlington* ..••..•.••••..••..•.•...•.. 179,700 163,401 16,300 10.0 25,700 7,000 -2,300 Augusta ...•••••...... ••...••... 42,000 37,363 4,600 12.3 4,800 2,100 1,900 Bath •.•.•••..••••••.•.•...•.•••...... 5,200 5,335 -100 -2.3 700 400 -400 Bedford •..•.•••.•••...••••...•.•.•.•• 33,200 31,028 2,200 7.0 4,100 2,000 100 Bland ..••••••.••••.....•.••.•••.••.•• 5,700 5,982 -200 -3.9 500 400 -1.00 Botetourt •.••••.•.•••.....•••••....•• 17,000 16,715 300 2.0 2,000 1,100 -500

See footnotes at end of table. 16 ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1, 1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960··Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change Population 1960 to 1966

State and county April 1, 1, Net July 1960 Nurr.ber Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 I ( census) _._------.-.. -

V1RGINIA--ConUnued 17,779- -1,100 -6.0 2,100 1,100 -2,000 Brullswick .••...••...•.•.•••..••....• 16,700 -6,300 35,100 36,724 -1,700 -4.5 6,200 1,500 Bllchanan •...•...... 0 ••••••••••••••• 10,877 300 3.2 1,600 800 -500 Buckirlgham .•...... 11,200 2,700 39,300 32,958 6/,00 19.1, 5,500 1,800 Campbell* ...... ,LI, 2,000 800 -100 Caroline .••...•.•...... •.••..•.•.• 13 ,800 12,725 1,100 45,822 -100 -0.1 e.,800 2,700 -2,200 Carroll? ....•.•...•.•...... •...... 45,800 -500 5,700 5,492 200 3.6 1,100 300 Charles City ...... 1,800 900 -1,000 Charlotte ••.•..•.••.•...... ••.•..... 13,400 13 ,368 (z) (Z) 1.3.7 10,900 2,900 23,100 Chesterfield* ..•...... •...... 102,300 71,197 31,100 2.1 1,000 600 -200 Clarke ...... 8,100 7,942 200 -300 3,100 3,356 -200 -6.3 400 200 Craig ~ ...•..••..•••.•..••••..••••••• 2,300 1,200 600 Culpeper .....•.•...... •.••.•..... 16,800 15,088 1,700 11.0 6,360 eOO 5.5 800 400 (z) Cuml,erland ...... 6,700 -5,000 16,800 20,211 -3,500 -1'7.1 2,400 900 Dickenson. ~ .•.••.•••..••••••.•• 0 •••• 16.3 3,300 1,100 1,500 Dinwiddie-;: ...... •...... •..•..... 25,800 22,183 3,600 11.1 1,000 500 300 Essex •••• '••••••••.••••••.••••••••••• 7,400 6,690 700 e8.7 L,5,700 il,500 95,600 Fairfax 8.)(-, ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• e05,500 272,674 132,800 20.3 4,100 1,800 2,500 Fauquier ...... 29,000 24,066 4,900 -2.9 1,100 700 -700 Floyd ...... 10,200 10,462 -300 7,227 1,100 15.3 1,000 500 600 F luva111la ••••••••••••••••••• .o ...... 8,300 1,200 4.8 3,700 1,500 -1,000 F• ranklin .J ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 27,200 25,925 21,941 6,400 29.4 3,300 1,200 4,300 rederic~ ...... 28,400 F 2.3 2,200 1,000 -900 iles •.. , ...... •...... •...• 17,600 17,219 400 G 1,200 9.8 1,500 900 500 Gloucesiter .•...•...... •..•.... 13,100 11,919 9,206 1,400 14.7 1,200 500 600 Gooch1and ...... 10,600 Grayson.? -100 5,100 4,715 300 7.3 800 300 Greene ...... · •..••. 2,200 900 -1,200 reensville 9 ••.•••••.••..••.•••• , ••. 16,200 16,155 100 0.5 G 200 0.5 5,600 2,500 -2,900 H alifax10 ....•..•..••.•.....•.....•. 39,800 39,611 .27,550 6,500 23.4 4,300 1,700 3,900 Hanover* •••.•.••••.•...... •..•..•••• 34,000 8, .i 117,339 20,200 17.2 17,100 5,400 500 Henrico* ...... •.. · ... · .. 137,500 40,335 7,700 19.1 7,100 1,800 2,400 Henry ...... •• .... •• 48,000 3,221 -100 -2.4 300 200 -100 ~ighland •••..•. ,. .. ~ ~ .••• ~ •.• ~ •• ~ ••.•• 3,100 H 1,100 6.2 2,700 1,100 -600 I sle of Wight •••••...•.•.••••..•...• 18,200 17,164 5,900 31.5 3,000 900 3,900 ames Cityll ...... 124,700 18,Bll J 300 4.7 700 500 (z) King and Queen •...... •.•.•..•.• 6,200 5,889 7,243 600 8.6 1,200 400 -100 K ing George ...... 7,900 -100 7,563 400 ~- .. 8 1,100 600_ K ing William ...... • 7,900 9,174 -200 -2.0 1,100 700 -600 L ancaster ...... • •. •·• • 9,000 25,824 -2,300 -8.9 2,800 1,600 -3,500 L ee ...... 23,500 7,200 24,549 9,500 38.6 3,900 1,700 L oudol.ID* ...... • • 34,000 12,959 1,200 9.4 1,800 1,100 500 L ouisa ...... •.•..••••....•••.•..... 14,200 12,523 (z) (z) 1,600 900 -700 L unenburg ...... 12,500 (Z) 8,187 500 6.0 1,000 500 Madison •...•.••••.•.•....••....•..•• 8,700 200 7,121 (z) 0.4 600 800 Mathews. '" .,'* ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 7,100 -2,e.00 31,428 -100 -0.3 4,200 1,900 Mecklenburg ...... 31,300 300 6,319 400 5.9 700 600 Middlesex ...... · • 6,700 3,800 140,000 32,923 7,100 21.5 5,100 1,700 Montgomery ...... 800 31,366 3,800 12.0 5,000 2,100 Narlsemond ...... 35,100 12,752 100 1.1 1,600 1,000 -400 Nelson ••...... ••...... ••.•••..•• · • 12,900 11.6 700 300 100 w Kent ...... 5,000 4,504 500 Ne -400 -2.3 2,500 1,400 -1,400 No rthampton ...... 16,600 16,966 10,185 -700 -7.0 1,100 800 -1,000 No rthumberland .•...••...•...•.....•• 9,500 -700 15,141 200 1.0 2,000 1,100 No ttoway ...... 15,300 200 13,900 12,900 1,000 7.9 1,900 1,000 Or ange ...... : ...... 1,900 1,100 (Z) pag 16,400 15,572 900 5.5 e ...... ·.········ . 200 1.5 1,900 900 -800 Patrick ...... 15,500 15,282 58,296 2,800 4.8 8,100 3,200 -2,000 Pi ttsylvania ...... 61,100 400 -100 7,000 6,747 300 3.9 800 Powhatan ••.•....•..•...•.•.•. · .• ·•· • -3.2 1,700 1,000 -1,200 Edward .•..••....•••..•.•.•.•• 113,700 14,121 -400 Prince 35.0 3,700 600 4,000 George ..•••.•..•..••..••..••• 27,400 20,270 7,100 Prince 35,400 70.5 13,800 2,000 23,600 Prince William" ...... 85,500 50,164 -300 28,700 27,258 l,500 5.4 3,400 1,600 Pulasld ••....•.•...... •••.••••••.••. 3.2 600 400 -100 ppahannock •....••...... ••.•.•..•.• 5,500 5,368 200 Ra 3.1 900 500 -200 chmond ...... 6,600 6,375 200 Ri 16,600 26.9 7,800 3,000 11,800 Ro anoke* ...... ••.•.•....•••.... · .• 78,300 61,693 See footnotes at end of table. 17

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF COUNTIES, JULY 1,1966, AND COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE SINCE APRIL 1, 1960--Continued (Asterisk (*) indicates metropolitan county. State estimates are shown to the nearest thousand, county estimates to the nearest hundred)

Change, Components of change population 1960 to 1966

State and county April 1, Net July 1, 1960 Nurr.ber Percent Births Deaths migration 1966 (census)

VIRGINIA--Gontinuect 1,L, 2,900 1,500 -~.,100 Roc]rbridgeI2 ...... 24,400 24,039 300 l3 6,600 12.6 7,000 3,100 2,700 Rockingham •••••• , ••••••••••••••••• , 159 000 52,401 24;800 26,290 -1,400 -5.5 3,200 1,400 -3,300 Russell ...... : ...... •. 3,000 1,400 -3,000 Scott ..•..•...... •.•.. 2/, ,400 25,813 -1,500 ··5.7 1,800 8.4 2,600 1,600 900 Shenandoah ...... ··•······ . 23,700 21,825 130,700 31,066 -300 -1.0 t"lOO 1,700 -2,700 SmYth ...... • ·· . 1.,300 1,700 -2,700 Southampton 14 ...... 27,100 27,195 -100 -0.4 2,000 700 700 Spotsylvania ...... 15,900 13,819 2,000 14.7 22.1 3,500 1,000 1,200 Stafford ...... ·.· .... · .. 20,600 16,876 3,700 1.4 800 ~OO -200 Surry ...... •...... •.... ·•··.·• . 6,300 6,220 100 -100 -1.0 2,000 1,000 -1,200 Sussex ••••••••••.•••••••••.• • •••••••• 12,300 12,411 -2,600 -5.8 5,600 2,600 -5,500 TazewelL ...... ······· . 42,200 44,791 14,655 1,300 9.1 1,900 900 300 Warren. ~ .•..•.•••••...... •.••.•• ~ •. 16,000 5,000 2,500 -300 Washington ...... 40,300 38,076 2,200 5.9 1,500 800 -100 Westmoreland ...... •.•...... •.... 11,600 11,042 600 5.3 -4,500 -10.3 5,500 2,600 -7,400 Wise ...•.. . l! ...... •• ••• ••••• 39,100 43,579 22,200 21,975 200 1.1 2,600 1,L,00 -900 Wythe ..•...•..•.....•...•..•.••...... 900 5,600 YorkI5* .•.• ;' •.•... , ••..•.•.••.•.•...• 29,200 21,143 3,000 37.9 3,300

Independent Cities 17,700 4,400 2,100 Alexandria" ...... •••..•..•.•...• 106,400 91,023 15,300 16.9 _500 2,000 800 -1,700 Bristol,•... i ...... 16,600 17,144 -3.1 4.6 800 300 -200 Buena Vista, ...... • 6,600 6,300 300 Char1ottesv,ille. 5 11,900 3,900 7,700 Chesapeake1 ...... 89,300 73,647 15,700 21.3 Clifton Forge. 6 1,500 500 3,200 Colonial Heights ...... 13,700 9,587 4,200 43.4 Covington. 6 0.9 6,300 3,100 -2,800 Danville ...... •...... •.••.. 47,000 46,577 400 ,Emporia. 9 'Fairfax.8 * Falls Church. 8* Franklin ,14 1,800 900 ~200 Fredericl{sburg ••••••••.•••.••••••• " •• 14,300 13,639 700 5.0 Galax. 7 17,000 4,100 11,300 Hampton* ...... , 113,400 89,258 24,100 27.1 13 Harrisonburg. 3,300 1,000 300 Hopewell ...... 20,500 17,895 2,600 14.5 Lexington. 12 6,800 3,800 -2,700 ljynchburg* ...... 55,100 54,790 JOO 0.6 900 1,300 i 22,000 18,798 3,200 17.2 2,800 Martinsville ...... •.•...... •..• 5,700 133,600 113,662 20,000 17.6 19,800 5,500 Newport New s * ...... 51,900 15,900 -40,100 Norfolk'· ...... •..••.....•..••.. 300,700 304,869 -4,200 -1.4 5,000 4,996 100 1.1 600 300 -300 Norton ...... ···•··•·• • 4.5 6,100 2,900 -1,600 Petersburg ...... 38,400 36,750 1,700 108,600 114,773 -6,200 -5.4 17,700 6,200 -17,600 Portsmouth* ...... 300 10,200 9,371 800 8.7 1,100 500 Radford ...... 29,000 18,100 -9,100 Richmond *.••...... •.•..•....•••.••.•. 221,900 219,958 1,,900 0.9 11,700 6,700 -3,000 Roanoke* ...... 99,000 97,110 1,900 1.9 South Boston. 10 24,800 22,232 2,600 11.7 2,400 1,500 1,700 Staunton ..•.•...•...•....••...•.• ·•• . -1,000 12,200 12,609 -400 -3.2 1,500 900 Suffolk ...... 18,300 3,400 38,200 Virginia Beach* ....•...... •••••..•• · 138,300 85,218 53,000 62.2 2,500 800 -700 Wa;ynesboro .•...... •...... •.•..•.. 16,700 15,694 1,000 6.1 Williamsburg. 11 2,000 1,200 -600 Winchester ..•.•...... •.....•.•.•.•.. 15,300 15,110 200 1.5 117,000 -162,000 WEST VIRGINIA •.....•..•..•.•...•• 1,809,000 1,860,421 -51,000 -2.8 228,000 -1,100 15,000 15,474 -400 -2.8 1,800 1,200 Barbour ...•....••...... •.... · •. 4,400 2,500 600 Berkeley ...... 36,300 33,791 2,500 7.4 3,100 1,400 -4,100 Boone ••.•...... •..•...••....••.•.• · . 26,400 28,764 -2,400 -8.4 15,400 15,152 200 1.3 1,900 1,100 -600 Braxton .•..•..•.•...... •••...•.•• -2,600 28,100 28,940 -800 -2.8 3,500 1,700 Brooke* ...... -5,700 108,800 108,202 600 0.6 13 ,500 7,200 Cabell* ....•...... ••...... ••.•..••• 600 -600 Calhoun ...•••••••...••...... •..•••. 8,000 7,948 (z) 0.1 1,100 1,600 600 -1,500 Clay ...... 1l,400 11,942 -500 -4.1 6,800 6,970 -100 -1.8 700 600 -200 Doddridge ...... 4,100 -8,100 Fayette .....•.••.•.•...... •• 56,200 61,731 -5,500 -9.0 6,700

See footnotes at end of table. 18

Change, Population Components of change 1960 to 1966 State and county April 1, July 1, Net 1960 Number Percent BIrths Deaths 1966 migration ) (census) , WEST VmGINIA--Continued Gilmer ...... 8,500 8,050 400 5.0 1,000 600 (z) Grant •.•.••.•••••..•.•••.•••..•..•.•. 8,500 8,3()!, 200 1.8 1,200 600 -500

Greenbrier .. ~ ...... ~ .... # •••• " ••••• 34,900 34,446 1,00 1.3 !e,300 -1,600 Hampshj.re ...... 12,600 11,'705 900 7.9 1,400 .~gg 400 Hancock" ...... 39,600 39,615 (z) (z) 5,200 2,200 -3,000 Hardy ...... 9,300 9,308 (z) 0.3 1,100 700 -400 Harrison .•.•••••.•.•..•..••.••••.••.. '75 400 77,856 -2,400 -3.1 9,200 5,600 -6,000 Jackson •••...•...•....••.•.••.•.•••.. 20;800 18,541 2,200 12.1 2,800 1,100 500 Jefferson ...... 19,'700 18,665 1,100 5.8 2,'700 1,400 -300 Kanawha* ...... 239,800 252,925 -13 ,200 -5.2 32,000 13 ,300 -31,800 Lewis ..•....•..•...•...•....••..•.••. 19,900 19,'711 200 1.0 2,100 1,500 -400 Lincoln .••.•...•••..••••••••..••••••• 19,800 20,267 -eOO -2.1 2,900 1,200 Logan ....•..••••.••..•••.•..•.••.•... 53,300 61,570 -8,300 -13.e 7,600 3,000 McDowell. ,...... 59,100 '71,359 -12,300 -17.2 9,000 4,000 Marion .. .;i .••••••...••••.•• .••••••••• 65,200 63,'717 1,500 2.3 6,900 1,,700 t1arshaU*;; ...... 13'7,100 38,041 -900 -2.t't 4,300 2,400 -2,800 Mason •.•••.••••••.••••.•••••.•••••.•• 2/, ,300 24,459 ··100 -0.6 3,000 -1,800 1, ,!eOO I k1ercer ...... 64,600 68,206 -3,600 -5.3 7,700 4,500 -6,700 Mineral ••••.•••.•....••.••..•••..••.• 24,300 22,354 2,000 8.8 3,200 1,600 . 300 Mingo ...... 37,600 39,742 -2,200 -5.4 6,000 2,300 .. 5,900

Monopg.a1~a .••.•..•••••..••••••••••••• 159,200 55,617 3,600 6.4 6,500 3,300 400 Monrde ...... 11,500 11,58t't -100 -0.8 1,200 900 -400 Morgan .• : ••••••.••...••••.•.••••..•.• 8,400 8,376 100 0.7 1,000 600 -400 Nicholas: ..••••••..•••.•.•.••.•..•..• 24,700 25,",14 -700 -2.8 3,300 1,400 -2,600 Ohio* .. t ...... 64,400 68,437 -4,000 -5.9 7,800 5,500 -6,400 Pendleton •.•••...•.••.•..•••.•.••••.. 7,500 8,093 -600 -7.6 800 500 -900 Pleasants ...... 7,300 7,124 100 1.8 800 500 -200 Pocahontas ...... 9,800 10,136 -400 -3.7 1,300 700 -900 Preston .••.••.•.•••••.•.••..••••••.•• 26,200 27,233 -1,000 -3.8 3 400 ' 1,700 -2,800 Putnam •.••••.••.•.••••.••••.•••.••••• 25,600 23,561 2,000 8.4 2;700 1,200 500 Raleigh •.•••.••••••...•.••••••••••••• 71,300 7'7,826 -6,600 -8.4 8,500 4,600 -10,400: Randolph •.•••••...... •.••.•.•••••.••. 26,900 26,349 500 2.0 3,600 1,800 -1,300 Ritchie •••...•...... •.•..•.••••.•..•• 10,'700 10,877 -200 -2.0 1,200 900 -400 Roane •..••.•.••..•..•••.•••••••••••.• 16,200 15, '720 (,00 2.8 1,700 1,000 -200 Summers ...... 15,000 15,640 -600 -3.9 1,600 1,300 -1,000 Taylor .•••..•.•..••.•••.•.••.•.•••••• 14,000 15,010 -1,000 -6.6 1,500 1,300 -1,200 Tucker ...•..••.•••.••••..•.••..•••..• 7,500 '7,750 -200 -2.6 900 600 -500 T,yler ...... 10,500 10,026 400 t h 3 1,100 800 100 Upshur •...... •...... ••.•.••.•.•.••.• 18,300 18,292 (Z) -0.1 2,200 1,300 -900 Wayne* ••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••• 39,000 38,9'77 (Z) (z) 4,600 2,000 -2,700 Webster •••.•.••••••••.•.•..••..••••.. 12,600 13,'719 -1,100 -8.3 1,900 800 -2,100 Wetzel •..•..•...... ••...••.....•••... 18,800 19,34'7 -600 -2.8 2,700 1,300 -1,900 Wirt ..•..•..••...... •...... •.•.•.•. 4,200 4,391 -200 -4.2 500 400 -300 Wood ..•...•.•••..••.•....••..•••.•..• 80,400 '78,331 2,000 2.6 11,100 5,100 -4,000 "}yorning ••• : ...... 32,500 34,836 -2,300 -6.'7 4,100 1,500 -5,000

Z Less than 50 or 0.05 percent. 1Adjusted to reflect changes in college and/or institutional population since 1960. 200nsistent with special census or State or county cenSus taken since 1960. 3Includes that part of Yellowstone National Park in Idaho. 4Sum of counties does not add to State total because of adjustment in Fairfax County. 5Charlottesville city included in Albemarle County. 6Clifton Forge and Covingoon cities included in Alleghany County. 7Grayson County and Galax city included in Carroll County. 8Fairfax and Falls Church cities included in Fairfax Oounty. Census count for 1960 adjusted to exclude 12,520 erroneously reported in Fairfax County. 9Ernporia city included in Greensville County. lOSouth Boston city included in Halifax County. llWilliamsburg city included in James City County. Adjustment made for annexation to WillIamsburg city from York County. 12Lexington city included in Rockbridge County. 13Harrisonburg city included in Rockingham County. 14Franklin city included in Southampton County. 15Adjustment made for annexation from York County to Williamsburg city. APPENDIX

STATE-DESIGNATED AGENCIES AGREEING TO WORK TOWARD A FEDERAL STATE COOPERATIVE PROGRAM FOR LOCAL POPULATION ESTIMATES

YBI'L.J.U:L1Jl:LLlllg States as of July 1968. Asterisk (*) coordinating ageDoy as oppo[~ed to agency carrying out technical program)

State State Official agency

Arizona. '0, •••••••• Michigan .•... ~ ~ .. " • . State Bureau of the Budget* Division CaBS Phoenix, Arizona 85005 Lansing, I~ichigan Center for Health Statistics Arkansas ••.••••••.. Industrial Research and Extension Center of Public Health of Arkansas ,street Arkansas 72203 48913 Oalifornia ••...••.• Population Research Unit State of Finance Minnesota ...... ~.,. Vital Statintic8 Division State Department of Health California 9581~· St. Paul., I~innesota 551.01 Colorado .•• '. . • • . . • • State State Mississippi... • .. . • ... Hural Life 80203

Delaware •••.•••.••• State Planning Office Mi8sissippl 39762 Thomas Collins Building 530 South DuPont Highway Missouri ...... " .• Administrative Services Section Office of "WIDT.rOi L~r and Budge·t Director Dover, Delaware 19901 Post Office Florida .. Z...... •. Bureau of Economic and Business Research Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 College of Business Administration Uni versi ty of Florida Nebraska ••••.•••••• Nebraska Dept. of Economic Development* Gainesville, Florida 32601 Division of State and Urban Affairs Post Office Box 94666, State Capitol • Georgia •••••••••••• State Planning Bureau Lincoln, Nebraska 68508 116 Mitchell Street, S. W. Bureau of Business Research Atlanta, Georgia 30303 The University of Nebraska Lincoln, Nebraska 68508 Illinois. • • • • • . • • .• Bureau. of Public Health Statistics Department of Public Health Nevada ••.•••••••••• Bureau of Business and Economic Research 300 East Monroe Street University of Nevada Springfield, Illinois 62706 Reno, Nevada 89507

Iowa .••.••••••..••• Office of State Planning and Programming New Hampshire ••. " • Office of Planning and Research State Capitol Department of Resources and Des Moines, Iowa 50219 Economic Development State House Annex Kansas ...... Division of State Plans Coordination Concord, New Hampshire 03301 State Department of Economic Development State Office Building New Jersey ••••••••• Department of Conservation and Topeka, Kansas 66612 Economic V8V8.W])mELn" Post Office Box Kentucky ••••••••••• Kentucky Program Development Office Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Capi tol Bunding Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 New Mexico •••••.••• Bureau of Business Research Univers1ty of New Mexico Louisiana ...... Division of Business and Economic Research Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 School of Business Administration Louisiana Polytechnic Institute New york •.••••••.•. Office of Planning Coordination* Post Office Box 1796, Tech Station Room 229, ,state Capitol Ruston, Louisiana 71270 A1bar,y, Ne;, York 12201 Maine ••••••••• , • •• • State Department of Health and Welfare State Health Department State House 84 Holland Avenue A1hany, New York 12201 Augusta, Maine ~330 North Carolina •••.• Maryland. • • •• • • . • •• Division of Biostatistics of Administration State of Health 27601 301 Street Baltimore, Maryland 21201 Carolina Population Center University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 t"1asBachusetts...... Bureau of Eesearch and Statistics Department of Commerce and Development Oklahoma •.•.•••.••• Bureau of 150 Causeway Street Boston, Massachusetts 02202

19 20

STATE-DESIGNATED AGENCIES AGRJ:;EtNG TO WORK TOWARD A FEDERAL STATE COOPERATIVE PROGRAM FOR LOCAL POPULATION ESTIMATES··Continued

(Partioipating States as of July 1968. Asterisk (*) represents ooordinating agenoy as opposed ·00 agenoy carrying out teolmioal phases of program)

State Offioial agency State Official agency

Oregon. . . . • .. • .. ;. Center for Population Research and Census Vermont...... Division of Public Heal"th Statistics Portland State State of Health 614 Montgomery P. O. Box 751) ll.5 Avenue Portland, Oregon 97207 Burlington, Vermont 05401

Pennsyl vania. • • . . . • State Planning Board Virginia •...• ~ • ~ • • • Bureau of Population and Economic l1of:warch Post Office Box 191 Uni versi·ty of Virginia Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Lambeth House Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 South Caroli.na..... Office of the State Auditor Post Office Box 11333

Columbia, South Carolina 29211 Washington •• ~ ••• ~. Q and Research Division and Affairs Agency South Dakota...... Divisi.on of Vital Statistics Olympia, State Department of Health Pierre, South Dakota 57501 West Virginia. ~ ••• ~ West Virginia Department of Commerce-)( State Capitol Termessee State Planning Commission.j(" Charleston, West Virginia 25.303 Division of State Planning C2-208 Central Services Building Nashville, Tennessee 37219 Center for Business and Economic Research Uni versi ty of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37916 State Board of Health Wisconsin ••.•.• ~ ••• I State Office Building Utah •.••. '.' .••.••.• U·oah Department of Development Services* Madison, Wisconsin 53701 State Capitol Salt Lake Oity, Utah 84114 Di vision of Buniness and Economic Research Reports and Analysis Section Wyoming ...... College of Corrnnerce and Industry Utah Department of Employment Security Uni versity of Wyoming 174 Social Hall Avenue Box 3925, University Station Salt Lake City, Utah 84·114 Laramie, Wyoming 83070 .j NOTE.--After the report was prepared, Rhode Island agreed to participate in the program with the following agency: Statewide Planning Program, Suite 300, 36 Kennedy Plaza, Providence, Rhode Island 02903.

UNITED STATES POSTAGE AND FEES PAID GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE U,S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE DIVISION OF puaLic DOCUMENTS WASHINGTON, D.C, 20402

OFFICIAL BUSINESS FIRST CLASS MAIL

"" U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 196B 345-002 (19)