to A. for the Water flow hours . holder noble with 1 ) at before crayfish lethal . tool crayfish reached through through crayfish 2 is A. and , and 1 ) , respectively 3 signal c Sept caged within 12within - - 2 pathogen 5 4 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 CPUE) signal signal that extinction a weeks signal ; lab – 2 crayfish 2 2 1,2 2 2 4 Aug 12 from from this astaci A.astaci . powerful 1 1 1 1 1 0 illegal of . of local downwards ( 5 astaci American A assays water of 0 0 0 0 0 eDNA eDNA Skullerudsjøen . . S S S S S P P P P P N N N N N noble ) and A and large volume CTAB protocol large volume CTAB ( , Trude Vrålstad Trude , 2014 and 2015, invasive outbreak 4 a carrier the in and avoid from presence (right) onitoring and eDNA monitoring. eDNA and onitoring in to and Astacoidea caged estimates rapid Møller 1 – plague - upstream a subsequent plague crayfish plague diagnosis). plague crayfish cage eDNA abundances Norway host below quantification limit (LOQ); 2 = 2 (LOQ); limit quantification below . 2 situation. Sampling locations are locations Sampling situation. the surveyed crayfish, h CPUE crayfish h plague spores/L water. Detection of Detection water. spores/L plague h is from from 3 of ak Decapoda in ( 553 and – low 5 4 3 2 1 3 3 3 3 3 methods Crayfish were from filters using filters from ) Natural History Museum of Denmark pathogen 544 nearest using probe based qPCR basedusing probe - noble natural July 3 screened for the screened for Rødnessjøen waters at 4 2 2 2 2 2 taken noble , Peter Rask Peter , . ( analysis includes the following steps a 4 1 crayfish crayfish crayfish the Norwegian Research Council Research Norwegian 1 1 1 1 1 is was the Fig and determined 5 to were , 0 0 0 0 0 locations clawed observed . Detection of crayfish plague spores in large freshwater systems. Journal of Journal systems. freshwater large in spores plague of crayfish . Detection 1 S S - S S S P P P P P N N N N N lakes monitoring were stored on ice and transported to the the transported to on ice and were stored Figure European (left) . extinction natural water samples were filtered on site at each location at each location on sitewere water filtered samples mortalities sample crayfish nights five was extracted extracted was of of Copenhagen, P. leniusculus leniusculus P. site 5L 5L was in disappearance samples sampling and distance (loc spreading and threatened 3x a filter tubingpump, and using a peristaltic filters, fiber glass Filters DNA Each and trap revealed 1 is supported by is supported . (eDNA) in     signal of and Two eDNA some 960 eDNA ) for University Strand 2014 et al, Strand 4;51(2): 2014 Ecology. Applied of noble, quantification and detection (eDNA) DNA Environmental prep). (in et al Agersnap narrow and signal 2 crayfish 1 4 astaci . Study     References 1. 2. outbreak in outbreak . plague , . 3 often better DNA A 4 3 2 1 5 monitor 3 3 3 3 3 , William Brenner Larsen Brenner William , (Fig crayfish 4 lake emerging American a originated interconnected upstream reason noble ) 2 4 2 2 2 2 to decline : the live 1 1 1 1 1 =CPUE) crayfish to the introduced two the 5 Rødnessjøen surveillance bait in 0 0 0 main 0 0 . North to S S P S S S P N P P P N N N N offers pathogen of peak, during . monitoring pathogen ) able over outbreak the plague plague Lake living during , Sune Agersnap Sune , is 4 trapnight environmental this leniusuculus illegally disturbing the , 1 water as eDNA year were plague outbreak of conclusions of astacus or 2 frontline increase, attributed that Rødnessjøen the we one astaci simultaneous 3 that monitoring where in and Norwegian 4 3 2 1 5 in Norwegian Institute for Nature Research 3 3 3 3 3 the the eDNA (crayfish/ plague 3 or crayfish Lake carriers crayfish monitoring 4 2 2 2 2 2 Astacus study, km Pacifastacus the ( in ( 1 1 1 1 1 sacrificing are 5 the traps conclude in etect ollow 20 (eDNA) noble 0 0 0 0 0 this D crayfish Detect location Establish mortalities F ~ cage site water filtering to qPCR. to filtering water site S S S S S P P P P P N N N N N crayfish -    We separate and Results In  , Steen Wilhelm Knudsen Wilhelm Steen , 1 traps crayfish DNA crayfish baited without with caged Europe, of a crayfish a of crayfish to 1 population in of invasion, of invasion, infection and uses 2 emerging uses 100 crayfish plague spores/L; 3 = >500 Crayfish eDNA copies/L water, or >100 Crayfis>100or water, copies/L eDNA Crayfish>500 3 = spores/L; plague crayfish100 baited signal spores) noble - crayfish Estimates 3 an to methods included . 2 1 25 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 spread crayfish using noble 4 , Johannes Rusch Johannes , monitoring 2 2 2 2 2 are the 3 Sept eDNA/spores - Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Norwegian Research, Institute for Water of 2 1 1 1 1 1 environmental by 5 monitoring of European noble monitoring introduced converted 0 0 0 0 0 invasive April (LOQ) - suggested S S S S S illegally P P P P P N N N N N eDNA Targeted strategies for safeguarding noble crayfish against alien and emerging threats) emerging and alien against crayfish noble safeguarding for strategies Targeted of crayfish – that non from estimates caused plague crayfish natural (copies ) often snapshots snapshots 1 astaci 3 illegally . noble . A copy using decline the cage 2 compare of , Stein Ivar JohnsenIvar Stein , of (Fig quantification spores in 1,2 the crayfish plague, increase/decrease Nov 2015 April Nov May 2015 June 3 spread, 5. Corresponding graphs show eDNA results of the 3 target species from each location: 0 = no detection; 1 = detection 1 no detection; 0 = location: each from species 3 target the of results eDNA show graphs 5. Corresponding of - crayfish in crayfish eDNA 2 - 1 we eDNA sample and analysis procedure, from on from procedure, analysis and sample eDNA 3 3 crayfish, Timeline with corresponding location maps showing the spread of crayfish plague (red) during one year based on classic cage m cage classicon based year one during (red) plague crayfish of spread the showing maps location with corresponding Timeline – – revealed – hypothesize caged drastic Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Norwegian Veterinary Oct astaci 2 2 2 1 limit eDNA monitoring monitoring eDNA eDNA in the water is also indicated directly on the map in red along with the condition of caged crayfish (living or dead wit dead or (living crayfish of caged condition the with along in red map on the directly indicated is also water in the eDNA . onitoring 1 1 A TARGET project (243907 (243907 project TARGET Live code: See our eDNA sample/filtration procedure on YouTube on procedure sample/filtration eDNA our See code: 500 Crayfish eDNA copies/L water, or ~3 or water, copies/L eDNA Crayfish 500 Observed mortality - location - Here, outbreak Detection Classic disease We alternative, Crayfish the signal M 2014 David Strand David 0 0 2014 The Figure 4 Figure QR S S P P N N below demonstrate Figure and at       Background (S) Crayfish Signal Noble Crayfish (N)Crayfish Noble numbered 1 numbered ~80 astaci Figure 3 Figure outbre the matching information supplementary provides (yellow) crayfishsignal and (green) crayfish noble of monitoring eDNA Crayfish Plague (P) Plague Crayfish

www.vetinst.no