Lee-Jackson-Maury •• January 1994

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lee-Jackson-Maury •• January 1994 Lee-Jackson-Maury •• January 1994. ADD: -- And what is it that we remember? First, and foremost, in this month of birthdays, are the three leaders of the Confederate cause. Robert E. Lee was born Jan 19, 1807, 187 yrs ago tomorrow, noble hero 'Who stands tall on everyone's list of outstanding spirits; Thomas Jon• athan Jackson was born Jan 21, 1824, 170 yrs ago this Friday. They called him Stonewall, and with reason,for he confronted a succession of invaders into his state with courage and imagin• ation, whtle marching his foot-cavalry eastward to the Richmond region when reserves were needed. Matthew Fontaine Maury was born Jan 14, 18061 188 yrs ago last Frid.:zy-. Another Virginian, Ma~ry was an internationally honored oceanographer and seaman who, with Lee and Jackson, answered the call of mother Virginia in 1861. These three heroes serve as monuments of memory for all the others, the sung and the unsung, who put a tear in our eyes and a lump in our throats, as we remember. Lee-Jackson-Maillzy" Jan 1994. My dearly beloved, we are gathered here today to engage in an exercise of remembering. Next to life itself, memory is the greatest gift of the Creator, for it is one of those traits that set mankind apart from other animals. Without memory we would not know who we are, or how we got here, or what there is for us to do. And yet, how easy it is to forget, to turn to other inter• ests, to live only for the moment, to let the drama and the emotion of the past fade away with the years. So, to help us keep fresh the memory, we erect monuments, altars of piled stones, and we make for ourselves regularly repeated ritual events. And what is it that we remember., we who gather here because of,our blood relationships with the past? We renember the sacrifices and the actions of men and women of courage and valor and g allantiy and loyalty and endurance. Three of them whose birthdays we celebrate in the month of January are heroes of a very ~cial quality, and may serv~ to remind us of them all. Robert Edward lee wasi:orn Jan 19, 1807, 187 yrs ago tomorrow, fifth child of Henry Lee, himself a hero of the war for American Independence, and learned about duty and honor and country from his family, and his neighborhood, and his schooling. Folwg the example of his soldier-father, Robert attended the military acadeil\V at West Point, where he distinguished himself by his scholarship and by his proficie rey in the arts and sciences of warfare. In 1829 he graduated without a single demerit on his record, a feat that put him into the highest rankings in the history of that rigorous academy. From that training Lee entered the Army as a professional soldier of character and integrity, intelligence and compassion. Thirty yrs after his commissioning, when his state seceded from the union in defense of the principles which had given that union its birth and its constitution, he chose to go with Virginia rather than with the United States. He resigned his commission, sadly, because his nation was not centered in Washington, but in his state. Although he hoped hew ould not be called upon to participate in a war he deplored, when his state asked for his sword in its service he readily complied. He became military advisor to~President Jefferson Davis, and then commander of the Armies of Northern Vir• ginia, to confront and to repel repeated invasions of the state. When he was given the command, Federal General George McClellan with 100,000troops was within 7 miles of Richmond. In the cri• sis Lee demonstrated his superior skills as tactician and respected leader, moving his forces to outwit and outflank his opponents, and in the process humilia:.ing his enemy while winning the un• dying love and trust of his troops. He knew them personally, he knew their families and their interests, he cheered them into battle, Hoorah for Texas, or brave Carolina, he would shout, wav• ing his hat in the air, standing in the stirrups of Traveller to see them. They responded with deeds of heroism that rach Confederate Flag Day. Raleigh, March 1994. 5, · David .i.. • Smiley. In a world filled with things,· one of the oldest of human activities has been the use of a thing to remind people of another, and far more important thing. The rainbow in the sky following the storm tells us of the covenant promise of Never Again; the dove-with a green twig in its beak is a symbol of peace and the drying-up of the genocidal floods; the vision of the fire on the hearth awakens all the emotions and the memories of home and family, of warmth and good will. Among man• kind's reminders, one of the oldest and most effective is the bit of cloth, richly colored, that we call a flag. The word itself is of norlh European origin, meaning a swath of bunting that rep• resented something much larger than itself. It sent a message to all who saw it that they were in the presence of a community, an armed force, or an official of importance. We know them by many names--colors, standards, banners, ensigns, pennants, guidons. They are descended from solid metal·or wooden standards, carried before rulers and military forces, so theycould be identi£ied from a distance.~The pharoahs of ancient Egypt had standards as symbols of their pwer, and there are inscriptions~owing them, with the words indicating that they were sacred icons, "agents of the enemies 1 ·discomfo.:rtune. 11 The legions of the Roman anny carried standards giving their designa• tion and their campaigns, and ~ere were also units which tied a piece of colored cloth to a· spear as they went into b~ttlel'\f'lags thus,begAn a~ insignia of leadership, and as a means of knowing friend and foe, and ~s a center toWiich embattled warriors could rally. There was a tradi tion of hbno~ expressed by symbols and standards long before our contiQent was discovered by Euro• peans. Before our national independence was daclared, a c ontinehtal flag flew over American troops beseiging Boston in 1776. It had 13 red:and white stripes; and the British Union Jack, wit~ its two crosses superimposed, on the upper left corner. Alroost a yearr after the d eclaration of inde• pendence, the continental congress adopted a design for a national flag. As the resoiutio~ stated its appearance, "' The flag of the United States shall be 13 stripes alternate red and white, with a union of 13 stars of white on ablue field, representing a new constellation." It was the old continental .flag, with all traces of British allegiance erased from its d~sign. But even before that change, the tiny Dutch island ofSt. Eustatius in the West Indies fired cannon to salute a ship flying the stars and stripes, marking the transfer of power formerly exercised by nobles and momrchs to a new order based upon the consent of the governed1 written com titutions, and freely (r.~lJ!cted representatives. A similar, and to us gathered here today equally as important, change a:::- ~~he political bands which united sovereign states prior to 1860. When people of seven Gulf• south states acted upon what they understood to be their civil rights·, dissolved those bands, to assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to 'Which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitled them--to quote the familiar and respected language of Thomas Jeffer• son in the Declaration of Independence--they acted quickly to provide a flag for their new nation. Early in Feb., 1861, at the Montgomery convention, a committee wasappointed to select a flag. Its report was adopted on March 4, 1861--133 yrs ago yesterday, and .the same day-·that Abraham Lincoln was inaugurated president of the United States,. the 27 Qf ±hem. that remains&. The symbolism of the selection of a flag to represent the new union, and the swearing-in of a leader who denied the dissidents the right of choice, of consent of the governed. The resolution adopted in Montgom• ery read as follows: the flag of the Confederate States of America shallCX>nsist of a red field with a white space extending horizontally through the center equal to one-third the width of the flag, the red spaces above and below to be of the same width as the white; the union blue, exten• ding down through the white space and stopping at the lower space; in the center of the union a circle of white stars corresponding to the number of States of the Confederacy." This flag became known as the Stars and Bars, and was first displayed over the state house in Montgomery. There have been disputes through the;>ears abou~ who designed that banner, whe~her a North Carolinian named Orren R. Smith, or Nicola Marschall of Marion, Alabama, born in Pru~iJ., an artist and craft man. Whoever did it, it was the Confederate ins1gnia, officially approvedlfAnother was celebrated in the song many consider the confederate national anthem--the bonnie blue flag thatl::aars a single star. And then there was the more familiar battle flag. At the first large battle of the war for southern independence, at Manassas Junction, near Bull Run, July 21, 1861, where the rebel yell first frightened the 1Bderal t roops , the officers noticed that the stars and stripes, and the stars and bars, looked alike from a distance.
Recommended publications
  • James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg
    “Such a night is seldom experienced…” James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg Karlton Smith, Gettysburg NMP After the repulse of Lt. Gen. James Longstreet’s Assault on July 3, 1863, Gen. Robert E. Lee, commanding the Army of Northern Virginia, knew that the only option left for him at Gettysburg was to try to disengage from his lines and return with his army to Virginia. Longstreet, commander of the army’s First Corps and Lee’s chief lieutenant, would play a significant role in this retrograde movement. As a preliminary to the general withdrawal, Longstreet decided to pull his troops back from the forward positions gained during the fighting on July 2. Lt. Col. G. Moxley Sorrel, Longstreet’s adjutant general, delivered the necessary orders to Maj. Gen. Lafayette McLaws, commanding one of Longstreet’s divisions. Sorrel offered to carry the order to Brig. Gen. Evander M. Law, commanding John B. Hood’s division, on McLaws’s right. McLaws raised objections to this order. He felt that his advanced position was important and “had been won after a deadly struggle; that the order was given no doubt because of [George] Pickett’s repulse, but as there was no pursuit there was no necessity of it.” Sorrel interrupted saying: “General, there is no discretion allowed, the order is for you to retire at once.” Gen. James Longstreet, C.S.A. (LOC) As McLaws’s forward line was withdrawing to Warfield and Seminary ridges, the Federal batteries on Little Round Top opened fire, “but by quickening the pace the aim was so disturbed that no damage was done.” McLaws’s line was followed by “clouds of skirmishers” from the Federal Army of the Potomac; however, after reinforcing his own skirmish line they were driven back from the Peach Orchard area.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Meeting on Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 7 Pm Will Be the MOTTS MILITARY MUSEUM, 5075 South Hamilton Road,Groveport, Ohio 43125
    My Fellow Roundtable Members: Our meeting on Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 7 pm will be the MOTTS MILITARY MUSEUM, 5075 South Hamilton Road,Groveport, Ohio 43125. Please come early and enjoy the great museum that our fellow Roundtable member Warren Motts has created. Please seewww.mottsmilitarymuseum.org for more information. Our Speaker will be author and guide Dan Welch, whose topic is “Gettysburg Campaign, June 3-July 1.” This talk will focus on the question “How Did They Get There?” and will follow the Union and Confederate armies northward across Virginia, Maryland, and into Pennsylvania during the weeks leading up to the battle of Gettysburg and examine the many battles and events that impacted both armies before the first shot of July 1, 1863. Dan currently serves as a primary and secondary educator with a public school district in northeast Ohio. Previously, Dan was the Education Programs Coordinator for the Gettysburg Foundation, the non-profit partner of Gettysburg National Military Park, and continues to serve as a seasonal Park Ranger at Gettysburg National Military Park. Please see our website at www.centralohiocwrt.wordpress.com for more information about Dan Welch. I have attached Tom Ayres’ report on our March Meeting, where Tom gives us a great follow-up discussion of the defense of the Fredericksburg riverbank by William Barksdale, as related by Frank O’Reilly at the meeting. Here is our Treasurer’s Report from Dave Delisio: Treasurer's Report for March 2019 Beginning checking account balance 3/1/2019 = $2,238.93 March receipts = $234.00 ($125.00 from dues, $109.00 from meeting book raffle) March expenses = $455.00 ($325.00 to Frank O’Reilly for speaker fee and $130 to Mike Peters for speaker expenses) Ending checking account balance 3/31/2019 = $2,017.93 Please pay your 2019 dues to Dave or me at the next meeting! And keep participating in the book raffle.
    [Show full text]
  • General AP Hill at Gettysburg
    Papers of the 2017 Gettysburg National Park Seminar General A.P. Hill at Gettysburg: A Study of Character and Command Matt Atkinson If not A. P. Hill, then who? May 2, 1863, Orange Plank Road, Chancellorsville, Virginia – In the darkness of the Wilderness, victory or defeat hung in the balance. The redoubtable man himself, Stonewall Jackson, had ridden out in front of his most advanced infantry line to reconnoiter the Federal position and was now returning with his staff. Nervous North Carolinians started to fire at the noises of the approaching horses. Voices cry out from the darkness, “Cease firing, you are firing into your own men!” “Who gave that order?” a muffled voice in the distance is heard to say. “It’s a lie! Pour it into them, boys!” Like chain lightning, a sudden volley of musketry flashes through the woods and the aftermath reveals Jackson struck by three bullets.1 Caught in the tempest also is one of Jackson’s division commanders, A. P. Hill. The two men had feuded for months but all that was forgotten as Hill rode to see about his commander’s welfare. “I have been trying to make the men cease firing,” said Hill as he dismounted. “Is the wound painful?” “Very painful, my arm is broken,” replied Jackson. Hill delicately removed Jackson’s gauntlets and then unhooked his sabre and sword belt. Hill then sat down on the ground and cradled Jackson’s head in his lap as he and an aide cut through the commander’s clothing to examine the wounds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fate of War: Fredericksburg, 1862
    Civil War Book Review Summer 2012 Article 6 The Fate of War: Fredericksburg, 1862 Timothy J. Orr Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Orr, Timothy J. (2012) "The Fate of War: Fredericksburg, 1862," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 14 : Iss. 3 . DOI: 10.31390/cwbr.14.3.07 Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol14/iss3/6 Orr: The Fate of War: Fredericksburg, 1862 Review Orr, Timothy J. Summer 2012 Schultz, Duane The Fate of War: Fredericksburg, 1862. Westholme Publishing, $28.00 ISBN 978-1-59416-145-2 A New Light Shines on the Battle of Fredericksburg Duane Schultz’s The Fate of War: Fredericksburg, 1862 offers readers a window into the lives of people touched by the forces of war, forces unleashed by the December 1862 battle of Fredericksburg. The Fate of War is not an academic history, and consequently, it has no discernible argument. In his preface, Schultz pleads with the reader to accept his book as it appears and not judge it according to the rigorous standards of academia. “This is not an academic history," he writes. “It focuses on individuals, not armies; on people, not plans and positions drawn on maps. It is a narrative about how soldiers and civilians react to the stress of war; a record of triumph and failure, courage and cowardice, compassion and cruelty" (vi). Essentially, The Fate of War moves from character to character, offering brief glimpses of their pre-war lives, their experiences during the battle, and how they endured the battle’s grim aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Meade Begin a Counteroffensive After Pickett's Charge?
    Did Meade Begin a Counteroffensive after Pickett’s Charge? Troy D. Harman When examining the strategy of Union Major General George Gordon Meade at the battle of Gettysburg, one discovers lingering doubts about his leadership and will to fight. His rivals viewed him as a timid commander who would not have engaged at Gettysburg had not his peers corralled him into it. On the first day of the battle, for instance, it was Major General John Fulton Reynolds who entangled the left wing of the federal army thirty miles north of its original defensive position at Westminster, Maryland. Under the circumstances, Meade scrambled to rush the rest of his army to the developing battlefield. And on the second day, Major General Daniel Sickles advanced part of his Union 3rd Corps several hundred yards ahead of the designated position on the army’s left, and forced Meade to over-commit forces there to save the situation. In both instances the Union army prevailed, while the Confederate high command struggled to adjust to uncharacteristically aggressive Union moves. However, it would appear that both outcomes were the result of actions initiated by someone other than Meade, who seemed to react well enough. Frustrating to Meade must have been that these same two outcomes could have been viewed in a way more favorable to the commanding general. For example, both Reynolds and Sickles were dependent on Meade to follow through with their bold moves. Though Reynolds committed 25,000 Union infantry to fight at Gettysburg, it was Meade who authorized his advance into south-central Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Gettysburg: Three Days of Glory Study Guide
    GETTYSBURG: THREE DAYS OF GLORY STUDY GUIDE CONFEDERATE AND UNION ORDERS OF BATTLE ABBREVIATIONS MILITARY RANK MG = Major General BG = Brigadier General Col = Colonel Ltc = Lieutenant Colonel Maj = Major Cpt = Captain Lt = Lieutenant Sgt = Sergeant CASUALTY DESIGNATION (w) = wounded (mw) = mortally wounded (k) = killed in action (c) = captured ARMY OF THE POTOMAC MG George G. Meade, Commanding GENERAL STAFF: (Selected Members) Chief of Staff: MG Daniel Butterfield Chief Quartermaster: BG Rufus Ingalls Chief of Artillery: BG Henry J. Hunt Medical Director: Maj Jonathan Letterman Chief of Engineers: BG Gouverneur K. Warren I CORPS MG John F. Reynolds (k) MG Abner Doubleday MG John Newton First Division - BG James S. Wadsworth 1st Brigade - BG Solomon Meredith (w) Col William W. Robinson 2nd Brigade - BG Lysander Cutler Second Division - BG John C. Robinson 1st Brigade - BG Gabriel R. Paul (w), Col Samuel H. Leonard (w), Col Adrian R. Root (w&c), Col Richard Coulter (w), Col Peter Lyle, Col Richard Coulter 2nd Brigade - BG Henry Baxter Third Division - MG Abner Doubleday, BG Thomas A. Rowley Gettysburg: Three Days of Glory Study Guide Page 1 1st Brigade - Col Chapman Biddle, BG Thomas A. Rowley, Col Chapman Biddle 2nd Brigade - Col Roy Stone (w), Col Langhorne Wister (w). Col Edmund L. Dana 3rd Brigade - BG George J. Stannard (w), Col Francis V. Randall Artillery Brigade - Col Charles S. Wainwright II CORPS MG Winfield S. Hancock (w) BG John Gibbon BG William Hays First Division - BG John C. Caldwell 1st Brigade - Col Edward E. Cross (mw), Col H. Boyd McKeen 2nd Brigade - Col Patrick Kelly 3rd Brigade - BG Samuel K.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia's Confederate Monuments
    32 CWN August 2020 had not had time or opportunity of Monday and Tuesday, arriv- to cook what they had. All the ing at Sharpsburg at daylight on troops had been without sleep Wednesday morning, September during the night previous, except 17. As a consequence, many had while waiting in line for the wag- become exhausted and fallen on trains to pass over a pontoon out on the wayside, and all were bridge at Harpers Ferry…. [N] worn and jaded.” otice was sent to me to hasten the Brig. Gen. William Barksdale, troops to Sharpsburg. I…started commanding another brigade in the command at 3 p.m. Halted this division, reached the main after dark…within 2 miles of Confederate force about 9:00 Shepherdstown, when, receiving a.m. “The battle was then, and orders to hasten forward, com- had been, raging for several menced the march at 12 o’clock hours,” Barksdale wrote, adding that night, many of the regiments that “a portion of my men had still without provisions.” fallen by the way from loss of There was no time to lose. sleep and excessive fatigue, hav- Perspectives on McLaws’s report continued: ing been constantly on duty for Sharpsburg, Phase One “On the morning of the 17th, five or six days, and on the march about sunrise, the head of my for the whole of the two preced- In previous columns we column reached the vicinity of ing nights.” Barksdale took 800 viewed the Battle of Antietam General Lee’s headquarters near men into the fight. from the perspective of Federal Sharpsburg.” McLaws located Many weary troops fell out on officers whose troops contended Lee, received orders and moved the way, but much of the division with their Confederate enemies his brigades into the battle al- was present in time to advance throughout the day in the woods ready well underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Reader
    Course Reader Gettysburg: History and Memory Professor Allen Guelzo The content of this reader is only for educational use in conjunction with the Gilder Lehrman Institute’s Teacher Seminar Program. Any unauthorized use, such as distributing, copying, modifying, displaying, transmitting, or reprinting, is strictly prohibited. GETTYSBURG in HISTORY and MEMORY DOCUMENTS and PAPERS A.R. Boteler, “Stonewall Jackson In Campaign Of 1862,” Southern Historical Society Papers 40 (September 1915) The Situation James Longstreet, “Lee in Pennsylvania,” in Annals of the War (Philadelphia, 1879) 1863 “Letter from Major-General Henry Heth,” SHSP 4 (September 1877) Lee to Jefferson Davis (June 10, 1863), in O.R., series one, 27 (pt 3) Richard Taylor, Destruction and Reconstruction: Personal Experiences of the Late War (Edinburgh, 1879) John S. Robson, How a One-Legged Rebel Lives: Reminiscences of the Civil War (Durham, NC, 1898) George H. Washburn, A Complete Military History and Record of the 108th Regiment N.Y. Vols., from 1862 to 1894 (Rochester, 1894) Thomas Hyde, Following the Greek Cross, or Memories of the Sixth Army Corps (Boston, 1894) Spencer Glasgow Welch to Cordelia Strother Welch (August 18, 1862), in A Confederate Surgeon’s Letters to His Wife (New York, 1911) The Armies The Road to Richmond: Civil War Memoirs of Major Abner R. Small of the Sixteenth Maine Volunteers, ed. H.A. Small (Berkeley, 1939) Mrs. Arabella M. Willson, Disaster, Struggle, Triumph: The Adventures of 1000 “Boys in Blue,” from August, 1862, until June, 1865 (Albany, 1870) John H. Rhodes, The History of Battery B, First Regiment Rhode Island Light Artillery, in the War to Preserve the Union (Providence, 1894) A Gallant Captain of the Civil War: Being the Record of the Extraordinary Adventures of Frederick Otto Baron von Fritsch, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Admiral's Log 2.Pages
    ! August 2014 ! ! ! The Admiral’s Log ! Sons of Confederate Veterans ! 1211 Government St., Mobile, AL 36604 ! Raphael Semmes Camp 11 ! ! ! ! Dear Friends and Compatriots of Camp 11,! Greetings and salutations from Camp 11. I certainly hope and pray that this edition of the Log finds all of you doing well.! The big news this month was the Sesquicentennial of the Battle of Mobile Bay. Several of our camp members attended and participated. Claude and Michelle Turberville, Mr. Jesse Taylor, Donovan Holifield and family and Matilda were at Ft. Gaines. Dustin Marshall and I were at Ft. Morgan for the event. I am sure a number of you visited as I did see Dave Brasell at Ft. Morgan.! For the most part I think the event went quite well. It was fun to spend a weekend at the forts and to visit with the reenactors and attendees. But the best part was getting acquainted with other SCV members and there were a lot of them there.! I do not think you will want to miss our meeting on the 25th. Dr. Lonnie Burnett of the University of Mobile will have a presentation about Mobile during the WBTS. See ya at the Dew Drop Inn at 6pm. Our meeting starts at 7pm.! Please continue with your prayers for our camp and its membership.! Best regards,! Terry W. “Beetle” Bailey! !Editor, The Admiral’s Log! Minutes 28 July 2014 ! Admiral Semmes, Camp 11 ! Sons of Confederate Veterans ! The meeting was called to order by Commander Joe Ringhoffer. ! The invocation was given by Assistant Chaplain Sid Phillips, III.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Williamsburg
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1980 The Battle of Williamsburg Carol Kettenburg Dubbs College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Dubbs, Carol Kettenburg, "The Battle of Williamsburg" (1980). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625106. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-bjb5-9e76 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BATTLE OF WILLIAMSBURG tf A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Carol Ann Kettenburg 1980 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, May 1980 LudweXl H. 'John^Vn JLJJLA Mi Royer luoyne Edward' M. Riley DEDICATION To my mother and father iii TABLE OP CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................... v LIST OP MAPS................................................ vi ABSTRACT................................................... vii CHAPTER I ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • James Longstreet and His Staff of the First Corps
    Papers of the 2017 Gettysburg National Military Park Seminar The Best Staff Officers in the Army- James Longstreet and His Staff of the First Corps Karlton Smith Lt. Gen. James Longstreet had the best staff in the Army of Northern Virginia and, arguably, the best staff on either side during the Civil War. This circumstance would help to make Longstreet the best corps commander on either side. A bold statement indeed, but simple to justify. James Longstreet had a discriminating eye for talent, was quick to recognize the abilities of a soldier and fellow officer in whom he could trust to complete their assigned duties, no matter the risk. It was his skill, and that of the officers he gathered around him, which made his command of the First Corps- HIS corps- significantly successful. The Confederate States Congress approved the organization of army corps in October 1862, the law approving that corps commanders were to hold the rank of lieutenant general. President Jefferson Davis General James Longstreet in 1862. requested that Gen. Robert E. Lee provide (Museum of the Confederacy) recommendations for the Confederate army’s lieutenant generals. Lee confined his remarks to his Army of Northern Virginia: “I can confidently recommend Generals Longstreet and Jackson in this army,” Lee responded, with no elaboration on Longstreet’s abilities. He did, however, add a few lines justifying his recommendation of Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson as a corps commander.1 When the promotion list was published, Longstreet ranked as the senior lieutenant general in the Confederate army with a date of rank of October 9, 1862.
    [Show full text]
  • John Bankhead Magruder
    JOHN BANKHEAD MAGRUDER AND THE DEFENSE OF THE VIRGINIA PENINSULA 1861-1862 by Leonard W. Riedel, Jr. B.S. May 1975, Virginia Military Institute A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August, 1991 ADDroved bv: Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Copyright by Leonard W. Riedel, J r., 1991 All Rights Reserved ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT JOHN BANKHEAD MAGRUDER AND THE DEFENSE OF THE VIRGINIA PENINSULA 1861-1862 Leonard W. Riedel, Jr. Old Dominion University Director: Dr. Harold Wilson The v ia b ility of the Confederacy depended on its a b ility to organize a government and m ilitary defense force. Two early concerns were the operation of Gosport Naval Shipyard and protection of the Confederate capital at Richmond. Poised between them was Fortress Monroe. With undisputed Union mastery of the Chesapeake Bay, Fortress Monroe was a constant reminder of the tentative security of these critic a l points. The man chosen to protect the Peninsula was Virginian, John Bankhead Magruder. Less than one year later, his efforts were denigrated by Commanding General Joseph E. Johnston who wanted to pursue his own strategic plan. Under constant stress, Magruder performed with alacrity. Although the Peninsula was evacuated in May 1862, Magruder did an admirable job of defense. Magruder’s place in history has been discolored by perceived b attlefield failures at Savage’ s Station and Malvern H ill.
    [Show full text]