DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidelines for Professional Ultrasound

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guidelines for Professional Ultrasound Guidelines For Professional Ultrasound Society and College of Radiographers and British Medical Ultrasound Society Revision 3, December 2018 SCoR/BMUS Guidelines for Professional Ultrasound Practice. Revision 3, December 2018 Minor amendments, March 2019. SOCIETY AND COLLEGE OF RADIOGRAPHERS AND BRITISH MEDICAL ULTRASOUND SOCIETY GUIDELINES FOR PROFESSIONAL ULTRASOUND PRACTICE DECEMBER 2015 Revision 3, December 2018. Minor amendments, March 2019 Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Foreword ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 December 2015 edition ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Revision 1, December 2016 .................................................................................................................................. 6 Revision 2, December 2017 .................................................................................................................................. 7 Revision 3, December 2018. Minor post publication amends March 2019 ....................................................... 7 SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION ......................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 EXPLANATION OF THE PROFESSIONAL TITLE ‘SONOGRAPHER’ ................................................................. 11 1.2 REGISTRATION FOR SONOGRAPHERS......................................................................................................... 12 1.3 PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.4 PROFESSION vs TOOL .................................................................................................................................. 14 1.5 SAFETY OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND ............................................................................................................ 14 1.6 MEDICO-LEGAL ISSUES ............................................................................................................................... 16 1.7 TRANSDUCER AND EQUIPMENT CLEANING AND DISINFECTION ............................................................... 17 1.8 SCREENING EXAMINATIONS USING ULTRASOUND .................................................................................... 19 1.9 ERGONOMIC PRACTICE INCLUDING MANAGING THE HIGH BMI PATIENT ................................................ 21 1.10 INTIMATE EXAMINATIONS AND CHAPERONES .......................................................................................... 23 1.11 EXAMINATION TIMES ................................................................................................................................. 24 1.12 THE 6 C’s, PATIENT IDENTIFICATION, COMMUNICATION AND CONSENT ................................................. 25 1.13 CLINICAL GOVERNANCE .............................................................................................................................. 27 1.14 E-LEARNING FOR HEALTHCARE .................................................................................................................. 29 1.15 IMAGING SERVICES ACCREDITATION SCHEME (ISAS) ................................................................................ 29 1.16 ULTRASOUND EQUIPMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE TESTING .............................................................. 30 1.17 RAISING CONCERNS; SAFEGUARDING; STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR REPORTING FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION (FGM), DUTY OF CANDOUR .............................................................................................................. 31 1.17.1 Raising concerns ...................................................................................................................................... 31 1.17.2 Safeguarding ............................................................................................................................................ 31 1.17.3 Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) - statutory requirements of practitioners ......................................... 32 1 SCoR/BMUS Guidelines for Professional Ultrasound Practice. Revision 3, December 2018 Minor amendments, March 2019. 1.17.4 Duty of Candour....................................................................................................................................... 32 1.18 CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................... 33 1.19 CODES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT FOR SONOGRAPHERS ..................................................................... 34 1.20 CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION ...................................................................................................................... 36 1.21 INDEPENDENT PRACTICE ............................................................................................................................ 36 SECTION 2: THE ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION .......................................................................................................... 39 2.1 OVERVIEW OF ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION PROCEDURES ...................................................................... 39 2.2 OBSTETRIC, VASCULAR, ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND BREAST EXAMINATIONS............................................ 39 2.3 NICE AND OTHER GUIDELINES .................................................................................................................... 40 2.4 VETTING OF ULTRASOUND REQUESTS ....................................................................................................... 41 2.5 JUSTIFICATION OF ULTRASOUND REQUESTS ............................................................................................. 41 2.6 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF AN ULTRASOUND REPORT ........................................... 43 2.7 GYNAECOLOGICAL ULTRASOUND EXAMINATIONS .................................................................................... 50 2.7.1 General scanning principles ...................................................................................................................... 50 2.7.2 Structures to examine and evaluate ......................................................................................................... 51 2.7.3 Pathology .................................................................................................................................................. 52 2.7.4 Extending the examination ....................................................................................................................... 57 2.7.5 Pelvic ultrasound reporting ...................................................................................................................... 57 2.7.6 Reporting Examples .................................................................................................................................. 57 2.8 ABDOMINAL ULTRASOUND EXAMINATIONS ............................................................................................. 59 2.8.1 General principles ............................................................................................................................... 59 2.8.2 Ultrasound examination of the liver ................................................................................................... 63 2.8.3 Ultrasound examination of the gallbladder and biliary tree .............................................................. 65 2.8.4 Transabdominal ultrasound examination of the pancreas ................................................................ 66 2.8.5 Ultrasound examination of the spleen ............................................................................................... 68 2.8.6 Ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta ............................................................................... 71 2.8.7 Ultrasound examination of the bowel ................................................................................................ 72 2.9 URO-GENITAL SYSTEM INCLUDING TESTES AND SCROTUM ...................................................................... 76 2.9.1 Ultrasound examination of the kidneys ............................................................................................. 76 2.9.2 Ultrasound examination of the testes and scrotum ........................................................................... 79 2.10 ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION OF THE ADULT HEAD AND NECK ................................................................ 82 2.11 PAEDIATRIC ULTRASOUND EXAMINATIONS ............................................................................................... 86 2.11.1 Paediatric liver and biliary system ...................................................................................................... 86 2.11.2 Paediatric Urinary system ................................................................................................................... 90 2.11.3 Paediatric gastro-intestinal tract ........................................................................................................ 91 2.11.4 Neonatal hip ......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • First Trimester Anomaly Scan Using Virtual Reality (VR FETUS Study): Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial C
    Pietersma et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2020) 20:515 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03180-8 STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access First trimester anomaly scan using virtual reality (VR FETUS study): study protocol for a randomized clinical trial C. S. Pietersma1, A. G. M. G. J. Mulders1, L. M. Moolenaar1, M. G. M. Hunink2,3,4, A. H. J. Koning5, S. P. Willemsen6, A. T. J. I. Go1, E. A. P. Steegers1 and M. Rousian1* Abstract Background: In recent years it has become clear that fetal anomalies can already be detected at the end of the first trimester of pregnancy by two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound. This is why increasingly in developed countries the first trimester anomaly scan is being offered as part of standard care. We have developed a Virtual Reality (VR) approach to improve the diagnostic abilities of 2D ultrasound. Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound datasets are used in VR assessment, enabling real depth perception and unique interaction. The aim of this study is to investigate whether first trimester 3D VR ultrasound is of additional value in terms of diagnostic accuracy for the detection of fetal anomalies. Health-related quality of life, cost-effectiveness and also the perspective of both patient and ultrasonographer on the 3D VR modality will be studied. Methods: Women in the first trimester of a high risk pregnancy for a fetus with a congenital anomaly are eligible for inclusion. This is a randomized controlled trial with two intervention arms. The control group receives ‘care as usual’: a second trimester 2D advanced ultrasound examination. The intervention group will undergo an additional first trimester 2D and 3D VR ultrasound examination.
    [Show full text]
  • GMEC) Strategic Clinical Networks Reduced Fetal Movement (RFM
    Greater Manchester & Eastern Cheshire (GMEC) Strategic Clinical Networks Reduced Fetal Movement (RFM) in Pregnancy Guidelines March 2019 Version 1.3a GMEC RFM Guideline FINAL V1.3a 130619 Issue Date 15/02/2019 Version V1.3a Status Final Review Date Page 1 of 19 Document Control Ownership Role Department Contact Project Clinical Lead Manchester Academic Health [email protected] Science Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester. Project Manager GMEC SCN [email protected] Project Officer GMEC SCN [email protected] Endorsement Process Date of Presented for ratification at GMEC SCN Maternity Steering Group on:15th February ratification 2019 Application All Staff Circulation Issue Date: March 2019 Circulated by [email protected] Review Review Date: March 2021 Responsibility of: GMEC Maternity SCN Date placed on March 2019 the Intranet: Acknowledgements On behalf of the Greater Manchester and Eastern Cheshire and Strategic Clinical Networks, I would like to take this opportunity to thank the contributors for their enthusiasm, motivation and dedication in the development of these guidelines. Miss Karen Bancroft Maternity Clinical Lead for the Greater Manchester & Eastern Cheshire SCN GMEC RFM Guideline FINAL V1.3a 130619 Issue Date 15/02/2019 Version V1.3a Status Final Review Date Page 2 of 19 Contents 1 What is this Guideline for and Who should use it? ......................................................................... 4 2 What
    [Show full text]
  • AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination of the Abdomen And/Or Retroperitoneum
    1 AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination of the Abdomen and/or Retroperitoneum Parameter developed in conjunction with the American College of Radiology (ACR), the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR), and the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU). The American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) is a multidisciplinary association dedicated to advancing the safe and effective use of ultrasound in medicine through professional and public education, research, development of parameters, and accreditation. To promote this mission, the AIUM is pleased to publish, in conjunction with the American College of Radiology (ACR), the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR), and the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU), this AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination of the Abdomen and/or Retroperitoneum. We are indebted to the many volunteers who contributed their time, knowledge, and energy to bringing this document to completion. The AIUM represents the entire range of clinical and basic science interests in medical diagnostic ultrasound, and, with hundreds of volunteers, the AIUM has promoted the safe and effective use of ultrasound in clinical medicine for more than 65 years. This document and others like it will continue to advance this mission. © 2017 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 14750 Sweitzer Ln, Suite 100 Laurel, MD 20707-5906 USA www.aium.org 2 Practice parameters of the AIUM are intended to provide the medical ultrasound community with parameters for the performance and recording of high-quality ultrasound examinations. The parameters reflect what the AIUM considers the minimum criteria for a complete examination in each area but are not intended to establish a legal standard of care.
    [Show full text]
  • Training in Diagnostic Ultrasound: Essentials, Principles and Standards
    This report contains the collective views of on international group of experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy offe World Health Organization TRAINING IN DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND: ESSENTIALS, PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS Report of a WHO Study Group Geneva 1998 WHO L~braryCataloguing In Publ~catlonData Training in diagnostic ultrasound : essentials, principles and standards : report of a WHO study group (WHO technical report series ; 875) 1 .Ultrasonography 2.Diagnostic imag~ng- standards 3.Guidelines 4.Health per- sonnel - education I Title II.Series (NLM Classification: WN 200) The World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full Applications and enquiries should be addressed to the Office of Publications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, which will be glad to prov~dethe latest information on any changes made to the text, plans for new editions, and reprlnts and translations already available. O World Health Organization 1998 Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy copyright protect~onin accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opnlon whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers' products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organ~zat~onin preference to others of a simllar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • ANC Level 1 2Nd Edition.Pdf
    Pregnancy & Childbirth Management Guidelines Level- 1 A Guide for Nurses, Midwives and Doctors Second Edition DEPARTMENT OF WOMAN &CHILD HEALTH DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE MINISTRY OF HEALTH SULTANATE OF OMAN 2016 ML- 60 Pregnancy & Childbirth Management Guidelines Level- 1 A Guide for Nurses, Midwives and Doctors Second Edition 2016 I II ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Acknowledgement with gratitude to all contributors & Reviewers for their effort in updating this guideline manual: Contributors from Woman & Child Health Department: • Dr. Jamila Al-Abri, Senior Specialist, Dept. of Woman & Child Health • Dr. Fatima Al Hinai, Senior Specialist, Director of Woman & Child Health Dept. • Dr. Nawal Al Rashdi, Senior Specialist, Dept. of Woman & Child Health • Dr. Salwa Jabbar Alshahabi, Specialist, Dept. of Woman & Child Health • Dr. Omaima Abdel Wahab, Senior Medical Officer, Dept. of Woman & Child Health. Contributors from Primary Health Care Institutions: • Dr. Nabila Al Wahaibi, Senior Consultant (FAMCO), Wadi Kabeer Health Centre. • Dr. Ahdab Abdul Hafeez, Specialist, Muscat Health Centre. • Dr. Imrana Masoud, Senior Medical Officer, Al Seeb Health Centre. Contributors from National Diabetic & Endocrine Centre & NCD department • Dr. Noor Al Busaidi, Senior Consultant, Director of National Diabetic & Endocrine Centre (NDEC) • Dr. Hilal Al Musailhi, Senior Consultant Adult Endocrinology, (NDEC). • Dr. Deepa Manoharan , Medical Officer, (NDEC). • Dr. Nada Hareb Al Sumri, Senior Specialist, Non Communicable Disease Dept • Dr. Suleiman Al Shereigi, Senior Specialist in Public Health Administration,(NDEC) Reviewers from Secondary & Tertiary Heath Care : • Dr. Tamima Al Dughaishi, Senior Consultant Obstetrics & Gynecology, SQUH • Dr. Bernadette Punnoose, Senior Consultant Obstetrics & Gynecology, Royal Hospital • Dr. Badrya Al Fahdi, Senior Consultant Obstetrics & Gynecology, Royal Hospital • Dr. Sumaya Al Amri, Senior Specialist Obstetrics & Gynecology, Royal Hospital • Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Prenatal Ultrasonography of Craniofacial Abnormalities
    Prenatal ultrasonography of craniofacial abnormalities Annisa Shui Lam Mak, Kwok Yin Leung Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China REVIEW ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.18031 pISSN: 2288-5919 • eISSN: 2288-5943 Ultrasonography 2019;38:13-24 Craniofacial abnormalities are common. It is important to examine the fetal face and skull during prenatal ultrasound examinations because abnormalities of these structures may indicate the presence of other, more subtle anomalies, syndromes, chromosomal abnormalities, or even rarer conditions, such as infections or metabolic disorders. The prenatal diagnosis of craniofacial abnormalities remains difficult, especially in the first trimester. A systematic approach to the fetal Received: May 29, 2018 skull and face can increase the detection rate. When an abnormality is found, it is important Revised: June 30, 2018 to perform a detailed scan to determine its severity and search for additional abnormalities. Accepted: July 3, 2018 Correspondence to: The use of 3-/4-dimensional ultrasound may be useful in the assessment of cleft palate and Kwok Yin Leung, MBBS, MD, FRCOG, craniosynostosis. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging can facilitate the evaluation of the palate, Cert HKCOG (MFM), Department of micrognathia, cranial sutures, brain, and other fetal structures. Invasive prenatal diagnostic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gascoigne Road, techniques are indicated to exclude chromosomal abnormalities. Molecular analysis for some Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China syndromes is feasible if the family history is suggestive. Tel. +852-3506 6398 Fax. +852-2384 5834 E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Craniofacial; Prenatal; Ultrasound; Three-dimensional ultrasonography; Fetal structural abnormalities This is an Open Access article distributed under the Introduction terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non- Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non- Craniofacial abnormalities are common.
    [Show full text]
  • Incidental Findings General Medical Ultrasound Examinations: Management and Diagnostic Pathways Guidance
    w Incidental Findings General Medical Ultrasound Examinations: Management and Diagnostic Pathways Guidance September 2020 Acknowledgements The British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS) would like to acknowledge the work and assistance provided by the following in the production of this guideline: The Professional Standards Group BMUS 2019-2020: Chair: Mrs Catherine Kirkpatrick Consultant Sonographer Professor (Dr.) Rhodri Evans BMUS President. Consultant Radiologist Mrs Pamela Parker BMUS President Elect. Consultant Sonographer Dr Peter Cantin PhD. Consultant Sonographer Dr Oliver Byass. Consultant Radiologist Miss Alison Hall Consultant Sonographer Mrs Hazel Edwards Sonographer Mr Gerry Johnson Consultant Sonographer Dr. Mike Smith PhD. Physiotherapist/Senior Lecturer Professor (Dr.) Adrian Lim, Consultant Radiologist In addition, the documentation and protocol evidence from Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth NHS Trusts and United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust for template derivation. Foreword The introduction of this guidance document regarding the diagnosis and management of incidental findings is timely. The changing landscapes of ultrasound practice combined with the significant communication challenges within a variety of referral sources can often add to the pressures exerted on the ultrasound practitioner. The demand for diagnostic ultrasound examinations is ever increasing. Faster patient throughput and increasing complexities of patient management, coupled with advancing ultrasound technologies leads to an inevitable increase in ‘incidentalomas’. The challenges facing ultrasound practitioners include the re-definition of ‘normal’ due to increased resolution of imaging, dilemmas around reporting of incidental findings and managing the effects of this for the patients and the referring clinicians. These guidelines are a resource that can be used as a basis for diagnostic pathways and reporting protocols, and can be modified as appropriate to align with locally agreed protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • LNCS 5242, Pp
    Real-Time Simulation of Medical Ultrasound from CT Images Ramtin Shams1, Richard Hartley1,2, and Nassir Navab3 1 RSISE, The Australian National University, Canberra 2 NICTA, Canberra, Australia 3 Computer Aided Medical Procedures (CAMP), TU M¨unchen, Germany Abstract. Medical ultrasound interpretation requires a great deal of experience. Real-time simulation of medical ultrasound provides a cost- effective tool for training and easy access to a variety of cases and ex- ercises. However, fully synthetic and realistic simulation of ultrasound is complex and extremely time-consuming. In this paper, we present a novel method for simulation of ultrasound images from 3D CT scans by breaking down the computations into a preprocessing and a run-time phase. The preprocessing phase produces detailed fixed-view 3D scatter- ing images and the run-time phase generates view-dependent ultrasonic artifacts for a given aperture geometry and position within a volume of interest. We develop a simple acoustic model of the ultrasound for the run-time phase, which produces realistic ultrasound images in real-time when combined with the previously computed scattering image. 1 Introduction Ultrasound is a challenging imaging modality to master due to a multitude of pa- rameters involved in acquisition and interpretation of resulting images. Real-time simulation of ultrasound can be used for training to complement a theoretical study program. A recent study in [1] reports a significant improvement in skills of subjects who received additional simulator-based training. The main advantage is easy access to a wealth of standard and rare cases collected over time. Existing methods for real-time simulation of ultrasound such as [2,3,4] are based on acquisition of actual ultrasound images and creating a compounded 3D volume of the region of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope of Practice and Clinical Standards for the Diagnostic Medical Sonographer
    Scope of Practice and Clinical Standards for the Diagnostic Medical Sonographer April 13, 2015 This page intentionally left blank. © 2013-2015 by the participating organizations as a “joint work” as defined in 17 U.S. Code § 101 (the Copyright Act). Contact the Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonography for more information. 2 SCOPE OF PRACTICE REVISION PROCESS In May 2013, representatives of sixteen organizations came together to begin the process of revising the existing Scope of Practice and Clinical Practice Standards. Thus began a process that engaged the participating organizations in an unrestricted dialogue about needed changes. The collaborative process and exchange of ideas has led to this document, which is reflective of the current community standard of care. The current participants recommend a similar collaborative process for future revisions that may be required as changes in ultrasound technologies and healthcare occur. PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS The following organizations participated in the development of this document. Those organizations that have formally endorsed the document are identified with the “†” symbol. Supporting organizations are identified with the "*" symbol. • American College of Radiology (ACR) * • American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) * • American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) * • American Registry for Diagnostic Medical Sonography (ARDMS) * • American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) * • American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) † • American Society of
    [Show full text]
  • Fetal Medicine August 2010
    Advanced Training Skills Module – Fetal Medicine August 2010 Fetal Medicine This module is designed to prepare the future consultant for dealing with congenital abnormalities detected during pregnancy. This includes the organisation and supervision of screening programmes for structural and chromosomal anomalies. Many of these cases need to be managed within a multidisciplinary team which includes clinical geneticists and fetal medicine subspecialists. Apart from a sound knowledge of embryology and fetal physiology, clinicians working in this field must be competent in the prenatal diagnosis of common abnormalities. They also require a sound working knowledge of clinical and laboratory genetics in order that they can investigate and, where appropriate, refer suitable families. Competence in obstetric ultrasound is a prerequisite for advanced skills in prenatal diagnosis and fetal medicine. Trainees must complete the new Intermediate Ultrasound of Fetal Anatomy module prior to entry into the ATSM in Fetal Medicine. Attendance at a suitable Fetal Medicine theoretical course is a compulsory requirement of the module. This must be attended before completion of the ATSM and can have been done not more than three years previously. Specifically, once trained, individuals should: Work well as part of a multidisciplinary team Understand the organization of prenatal screening and diagnostic services at a local and regional level Be clinically competent in the prenatal diagnosis, counselling and management of common fetal abnormalities and markers of chromosomal abnormality. Be clinically competent and certified in first trimester screening for chromosomal abnormality by a combination of nuchal translucency assessment and biochemical marker assays. Be clinically competent at amniocentesis and have a sound knowledge of the principles and techniques of first trimester chorion villus biopsy.
    [Show full text]
  • Breast Ultrasound Tomography with Two Parallel Transducer Arrays
    Breast ultrasound tomography with two parallel transducer arrays Lianjie Huang, Junseob Shin, Ting Chen, Youzuo Lin, Kai Gao, Miranda Intrator, Kenneth Hanson Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS D452, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA ABSTRACT Breast ultrasound tomography is an emerging imaging modality to reconstruct the sound speed, density, and ultrasound attenuation of the breast in addition to ultrasound reflection/beamforming images for breast cancer detection and charac- terization. We recently designed and manufactured a new synthetic-aperture breast ultrasound tomography prototype with two parallel transducer arrays consisting of a total of 768 transducer elements. The transducer arrays are translated verti- cally to scan the breast in a warm water tank from the chest wall/axillary region to the nipple region to acquire ultrasound transmission and reflection data for whole-breast ultrasound tomography imaging. The distance of these two ultrasound transducer arrays is adjustable for scanning breasts with different sizes. We use our breast ultrasound tomography pro- totype to acquire phantom and in vivo patient ultrasound data to study its feasibility for breast imaging. We apply our recently developed ultrasound imaging and tomography algorithms to ultrasound data acquired using our breast ultrasound tomography system. Our in vivo patient imaging results demonstrate that our breast ultrasound tomography can detect breast lesions shown on clinical ultrasound and mammographic images. Keywords: Breast cancer, reflection, sound speed, synthetic-aperture ultrasound, transmission, ultrasound attenuation, ultrasound imaging, ultrasound tomography. 1. INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer death among American women. The breast cancer mortality rate in the U.S. changed little from 1930s-1990s, and has decreased only approximately 20% since the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • MI Lab 2011, Images and Stories
    www.ntnu.no/milab MI Lab 2011 MI Lab 2011 Verdana Impact Established by the Research Council of Norway Verdana Impact Established by the Research Council of Norway MI Lab partners MI Lab 2011 MI Lab partners TM MI Lab leader published. These two landmarks confirm the MI Lab Professor olav Haraldseth vision that innovations in medical imaging can facilitate [email protected] cost efficient health care and improved patient outcome at the same time. For MI Lab 2011 was a good year. As MI Lab leader I am happy about two things: We now have a broad research • It is nice to see the competence and enthusiasm of activity with a multi-disciplinary the group of PhD and post doc students. They obtain group of 31 on-going PhD experience in medical R&D in the crossroad between students and post doctoral fellows, and we c ontinuously university, industry and hospital, and will be a future get new ideas that have potential for the MI Lab vision of pool for recruitment of high-quality personnel for inventions that may facilitate cost efficient health care Norwegian industrial R&D, health care and academia. and improved patient outcome. • Our experience so far is that we in MI Lab are able to build an arena for open innovation and long-term The MI Lab partner MediStim ASA obtained an official industrial research with high scientific quality and recommendation in the United Kingdom of the health good commitment from the partners. In 2011 this benefits of the ultrasound system VeriQ: “The case resulted in a publication list of 34 scientific papers for adopting the VeriQ system in the National Health printed in international journals with referee, and MI System for assessing graft flow during coronary artery Lab also have several important inventions in differ- bypass graft surgery is supported by the evidence.
    [Show full text]