DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Article (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Article (PDF) OCCASIO AL PAPER NO. 239 ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA OCCASIONAL PAPERNO. 239 RECORDS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA Arachnid fauna of Nallamalai Region, Eastern Ghats Andhra Pradesh, India K. THULSI RAO D.B. BASTAWADE* S.M. MAQSOOD JAVED I. SIVA RAMA'KRISHNA Assistant Conservator of Forests, Eco-Research & Monitoring Laboratories, Bio.diversity, Project TIger, Srisailanz-518 102. Kurnool Dist. Andhra Pradesh, India * Western Regional Station, Zoological Survey of India, Pune Edited by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata Zoological S:~ey of India Kolkata CITATION Thulsi Rao, K., Bastawade, D.B., Maqsood Javed, S.M. and Siva Rama Krishna, I. 2005. Arachnid fauna of Nallamalai Region, Eastern Ghats, Andhra Pradesh, India, Rec. zool. Surv. India, Occ. Paper No. 239 : 1-42. (Published by the Director, zool Surv. India, Kolkata). Published: July, 2005 ISBN: 81-8171-075-4 © Government of India, 2005 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • No part of this publication may be reprcduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any from or by ~ny means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. • This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall .not, by way of trade, be lent, re-sold hired out or otherwise disposed of without the publisher's consent, in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published. • The correct price of this publication is the price printed on this page. Any revised price indicated by a rubber stamp or by a sticker or by any other means is incorrect and should be unacceptable. PRICE India: Rs. 100.00 Foreign : $ 7; £ 5 Published at the Publication Division by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, 234/4, A. J. C. Bose Road, 2nd MSQ Building (13th Floor), Nizam Palace, Kolkata - 700020 and printed at Krishna Printing Works, 106, Vivekananda Road, Kolkata - 700 006. Records of the Zoological Survey of India Occasional Paper No. 239 2005 1-42 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 STUDY AREA .......................................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 1 SPECIES INVENTORY ........................................................................................................... 3 SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNT OF SPECIES REPORTED ........................................................ 6 Mesobulhus lamulus tamulus (Fabricus) ........................................................................ 6 Lychas (Endotricus) tricarinatus Simon ......................................................................... 6 Stenochirus sarasinorums Karsch .................................................................................... 7 Isometrus (Reddyanus) vittatus Pocock ......................................................................... 7 Isometrus (Reddyanus) corbeti Tik.ader & Bastawade .................................................. 8 Heleromelrus (Gigantometrus) swammerdami Simon .................................................... 8 Heteromelrus (Chersonesometrus) gran ulom an us COllzijn ............................................ 9 Phrynichus sp ................................................................................................................... 9 Galeodes indicus Pocock ............................................................................................... 10 Rhagodes nigrocinctus Bernard ..................................................................................... 11 Acanthodon constructor Pocock ................................................................................... 12 Poecilotheria regalis Pocock ........................................................................................ 12 Chilobrachys fimbriatus Pocock ................................................................................... 14 Chilobrachys hardwickii (Pocock) ............................................................................... 14 Gasteracantha geminata (Fabricius) ............................................................................. I) Argiope aemula (Walckenaer) ....................................................................................... 15 Argiope anasuja Thorell ................................................................................................. 16 Argiope arcuata Simon ................................................................................................... 16 Argiope lobata Pallas ...................................................................................................... 17 Argiop PUICI1('lla Thorell ................................................................................................ 18 (iv) Araneus mitifica (Simon) ............................................................................................... 18 Neoscona bengalensis Tikader & Bal ............................................................................ 19 Neoscona mukerjei Tikader ............................................................................................ 20 Neoscona rumpfi (Thorell) ............................................................................................. 20 Neoscona laglaizei (Simon) ..................................................................•........................ 21 Zygeilla indica Tikader & Bal ....................................................................................... 21 Herennia ornatissima (Doleschall) ................................................................................ 22 Crytophora citricola (Forskal) ...................................................................................... 22 Ctenus tndicus Gravely .................................................................................................... 23 Castianeira zetes (Simon) ................................................................................................ 24 Stegodyphus sarasinorum Karsch ................................................................................... 24 Hersilia savignyi Lucas .................................................................................................. 25 Evippa rajasthaneus Tikader & Malhotra ..................................................................... 25 Lycosa kempi Gravely ..................................................................................................... 26 Lycosa indagatrix Walckenaer ........................................................................................ 26 Lycosa nigrotibialis Simon .............................................................................................. 27 Hippasa greenalliae (B lackwall) .................................................................................... 27 Hippasa olivacea (Thorell) ............................................................................................ 28 Pardosa birmanica Simon .............................................................................................. 28 Pardosa atropa/pis Gravely ............................................................................................ 29 Pardosa sumatrana (Thorell) .......................................................................................... 29 Peucetia yogeshi Jonathan .............................................................................................. 30 Oxyopes pawani Gajbe ................................................................................................... 31 At·tema atlanta Walckenaer ............................................................................................ 31 Crossopriza lyoni (Blackwall) ......................................................................................... 32 Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin) .................................................................................. 32 Heteropoda sexpunctata Simon ...................................................................................... 33 Heteropoda nilgirina Pocock .......................................................................................... 33 Spariolenus petricola Gravely ........................................................................................ 34 Tetragnatha mandibulata Walckenaer ............................................................................ 35 (v) Nephila kuhlii DO'leschall ............................................................................................... 35 Nephila maculata (Fabricus) .......................................................................................... 36 Leucauge tessellata (Thorell) ......................................................................................... 36 Leucauge decorata (Blackwall) ....................................................................................... 37 Philodromus betrabatai Tikader ..................................................................................... 37 TIbellus pashanensis Tikader .......................................................................................... 38 Marpissa mandai; Tikader ............................................................................................... 38 Myrmarachne providens Peckham et Peckham ............................................................ 39
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Project Completion Report
    CEPF SMALL GRANT FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Organization Legal Name: - Tarantula (Araneae: Theraphosidae) spider diversity, distribution and habitat-use: A study on Protected Area adequacy and Project Title: conservation planning at a landscape level in the Western Ghats of Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka Date of Report: 18 August 2011 Dr. Manju Siliwal Wildlife Information Liaison Development Society Report Author and Contact 9-A, Lal Bahadur Colony, Near Bharathi Colony Information Peelamedu Coimbatore 641004 Tamil Nadu, India CEPF Region: The Western Ghats Region (Sahyadri-Konkan and Malnad-Kodugu Corridors). 2. Strategic Direction: To improve the conservation of globally threatened species of the Western Ghats through systematic conservation planning and action. The present project aimed to improve the conservation status of two globally threatened (Molur et al. 2008b, Siliwal et al., 2008b) ground dwelling theraphosid species, Thrigmopoeus insignis and T. truculentus endemic to the Western Ghats through systematic conservation planning and action. Investment Priority 2.1 Monitor and assess the conservation status of globally threatened species with an emphasis on lesser-known organisms such as reptiles and fish. The present project was focused on an ignored or lesser-known group of spiders called Tarantulas/ Theraphosid spiders and provided valuable information on population status and potential conservation sites in Uttara Kannada district, which will help in future monitoring and assessment of conservation status of the two globally threatened theraphosid species T. insignis and Near Threatened T. truculentus. Investment Priority 2.3. Evaluate the existing protected area network for adequate globally threatened species representation and assess effectiveness of protected area types in biodiversity conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Spider Checklist
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • A Current Research Status on the Mesothelae and Mygalomorphae (Arachnida: Araneae) in Thailand
    A Current Research Status on the Mesothelae and Mygalomorphae (Arachnida: Araneae) in Thailand NATAPOT WARRIT Department of Biology Chulalongkorn University S piders • Globally included approximately 40,000+ described species (Platnick, 2008) • Estimated number 60,000-170,000 species (Coddington and Levi, 1991) S piders Spiders are the most diverse and abundant invertebrate predators in terrestrial ecosystems (Wise, 1993) SPIDER CLASSIFICATION Mygalomorphae • Mygalomorph spiders and Tarantulas Mesothelae • 16 families • 335 genera, 2,600 species • Segmented spider 6.5% • 1 family • 8 genera, 96 species 0.3% Araneomorphae • True spider • 95 families • 37,000 species 93.2% Mesothelae Liphistiidae First appeared during 300 MYA (96 spp., 8 genera) (Carboniferous period) Selden (1996) Liphistiinae (Liphistius) Heptathelinae (Ganthela, Heptathela, Qiongthela, Ryuthela, Sinothela, Songthela, Vinathela) Xu et al. (2015) 32 species have been recorded L. bristowei species-group L. birmanicus species-group L. trang species-group L. bristowei species-group L. birmanicus species-group L. trang species-group Schwendinger (1990) 5-7 August 2015 Liphistius maewongensis species novum Sivayyapram et al., Journal of Arachnology (in press) bristowei species group L. maewongensis L. bristowei L. yamasakii L. lannaianius L. marginatus Burrow Types Simple burrow T-shape burrow Relationships between nest parameters and spider morphology Trapdoor length (BL) Total length (TL) Total length = 0.424* Burrow length + 2.794 Fisher’s Exact-test S and M L Distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Remipede Venom Glands Ex
    The First Venomous Crustacean Revealed by Transcriptomics and Functional Morphology: Remipede Venom Glands Express a Unique Toxin Cocktail Dominated by Enzymes and a Neurotoxin Bjo¨rn M. von Reumont,*,1 Alexander Blanke,2 Sandy Richter,3 Fernando Alvarez,4 Christoph Bleidorn,3 and Ronald A. Jenner*,1 1Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom 2Center of Molecular Biodiversity (ZMB), Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany 3Molecular Evolution and Systematics of Animals, Institute for Biology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany 4Coleccio´nNacionaldeCrusta´ceos, Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Auto´noma de Me´xico, Mexico *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]. Associate editor: Todd Oakley Sequence data and transcriptome sequence assembly have been deposited at GenBank (accession no. GAJM00000000, BioProject PRJNA203251). All alignments used for tree reconstructions of putative venom proteins are available at: http://www.reumont.net/ vReumont_etal2013_MBE_FirstVenomousCrustacean_TreeAlignments.zip. Abstract Animal venoms have evolved many times. Venomous species areespeciallycommoninthreeofthefourmaingroupsof arthropods (Chelicerata, Myriapoda, and Hexapoda), which together represent tens of thousands of species of venomous spiders, scorpions, centipedes, and hymenopterans. Surprisingly, despite their great diversity of body plans, there is no unambiguous evidence that any crustacean is venomous. We provide the first conclusive evidence
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders of Gujarat: a Preliminary Checklist
    OPEN ACCESS The Journal of Threatened Taxa fs dedfcated to bufldfng evfdence for conservafon globally by publfshfng peer-revfewed arfcles onlfne every month at a reasonably rapfd rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org . All arfcles publfshed fn JoTT are regfstered under Creafve Commons Atrfbufon 4.0 Internafonal Lfcense unless otherwfse menfoned. JoTT allows unrestrfcted use of arfcles fn any medfum, reproducfon, and dfstrfbufon by provfdfng adequate credft to the authors and the source of publfcafon. Journal of Threatened Taxa Bufldfng evfdence for conservafon globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Onlfne) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Prfnt) Short Communfcatfon Spfders of Gujarat: a prelfmfnary checklfst Archana Yadav, Reshma Solankf, Manju Sflfwal & Dolly Kumar 26 September 2017 | Vol. 9| No. 9 | Pp. 10697–10716 10.11609/jot. 3042 .9. 9. 10697–10716 For Focus, Scope, Afms, Polfcfes and Gufdelfnes vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/About_JoTT For Arfcle Submfssfon Gufdelfnes vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/Submfssfon_Gufdelfnes For Polfcfes agafnst Scfenffc Mfsconduct vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/JoTT_Polfcy_agafnst_Scfenffc_Mfsconduct For reprfnts contact <[email protected]> Publfsher/Host Partner Threatened Taxa Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 September 2017 | 9(9): 10697–10716 Spiders of Gujarat: a preliminary checklist Archana Yadav 1, Reshma Solanki 2, Manju Siliwal 3 & Dolly Kumar 4 ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) 1,2,4 Division of Entomology, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, The M.S. University of Baroda Baroda,
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles Present in the Spider Venom of Ornithoctonus Hainana
    toxins Article Origin and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles Present in the Spider Venom of Ornithoctonus hainana Chengfeng Xun, Lu Wang, Hailin Yang, Zixuan Xiao, Min Deng, Rongfang Xu , Xi Zhou , Ping Chen * and Zhonghua Liu * The National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Animal Peptide Drug Development, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China; [email protected] (C.X.); [email protected] (L.W.); [email protected] (H.Y.); [email protected] (Z.X.); [email protected] (M.D.); [email protected] (R.X.); [email protected] (X.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (P.C.); [email protected] (Z.L.) Abstract: Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes and microvesicles, are membranous vesicles released from nearly all cellular types. They contain various bioactive molecules, and their molecular composition varies depending on their cellular origin. As research into venomous animals has progressed, EVs have been discovered in the venom of snakes and parasitic wasps. Although vesicle secretion in spider venom glands has been observed, these secretory vesicles’ origin and biological properties are unknown. In this study, the origin of the EVs from Ornithoctonus hainana venom was observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The Ornithoctonus hainana venom extracellular vesicles (HN-EVs) were isolated and purified by density gradient centrifugation. HN-EVs possess classic membranous vesicles with a size distribution ranging from 50 to 150 nm and express the arthropod EV marker Tsp29Fb. The LC-MS/MS analysis identified a total of 150 proteins, which were divided into three groups according to their potential function: conservative vesicle transport-related proteins, virulence-related proteins, and other proteins of unknown function.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarantulas of Australia: Phylogenetics and Venomics Renan Castro Santana Master of Biology and Animal Behaviour Bachelor of Biological Sciences
    Tarantulas of Australia: phylogenetics and venomics Renan Castro Santana Master of Biology and Animal Behaviour Bachelor of Biological Sciences A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 School of Biological Sciences Undescribed species from Bradshaw, Northern Territory Abstract Theraphosid spiders (tarantulas) are venomous arthropods found in most tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Most Australian tarantula species were described more than 100 years ago and there have been no taxonomic revisions. Seven species of theraphosids are described for Australia, pertaining to four genera. They have large geographic distributions and they exhibit little morphological variation. The current taxonomy is problematic, due to the lack of comprehensive revision. Like all organisms, tarantulas are impacted by numerous environmental factors. Their venoms contain numerous peptides and organic compounds, and reflect theraphosid niche diversity. Their venoms vary between species, populations, sex, age and even though to maturity. Tarantula venoms are complex cocktails of toxins with potential uses as pharmacological tools, drugs, and bioinsecticides. Although numerous toxins have been isolated from venoms of tarantulas from other parts of the globe, Australian tarantula venoms have been little studied. Using molecular methods, this thesis aims to document venom variation among populations and species of Australian tarantulas and to better describe their biogeography and phylogenetic relationships. The phylogenetic species delimitation approach used here predicts a species diversity two to six times higher than currently recognized. Species examined fall into four main clades and the geographic disposition of those clades in Australia seems to be related to precipitation and its seasonality.
    [Show full text]
  • In Silico Analysis of Κ-Theraphotoxin-Cg2a from Chilobrachys Guangxiensis
    Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics Vol. 57, August 2020, pp. 458-466 In silico analysis of -theraphotoxin-Cg2a from Chilobrachys guangxiensis Zubin Abdul Zaheer & Kavitha Sankaranarayanan* Ion Channel Biology Laboratory, AU-KBC Research Centre, Madras Institute of Technology, Anna University, Chennai-600 044, Tamil Nadu, India Received 19 October 2019; revised 05 February 2020 -theraphotoxin-Cg2a is a 29- residue polypeptide extracted from the venomous glands of the Chinese earth tiger tarantula Chilobrachys guangxiensis. Plethoras of cancers are being associated with irregular functions of potassium ion channels. An extensive understanding of the toxin’s interaction with the voltage-gated potassium channels is of utmost necessity for it to be screened as a potential pharmacological molecule which may perhaps serve as toxin-based therapy to manage various cancer channelopathies. Physicochemical properties were studied, the evolutionary analysis was done to visualize the conserved domain among different toxins of tarantula family, docking studies between -theraphotoxin-Cg2a and a voltage-gated potassium ion channel was done by ClusPro 2.0. The presence of signal peptide was observed using PSIPRED. Cysteine – disulfide bonds present in the amino acid sequence was predicted by DiANNA server. Multiple sequence alignment illustrated conserved residues with other families of tarantula’s toxin. The docking of -theraphotoxin- Cg2a with the voltage-gated potassium channel was found to be interactive. The presence of cysteine –disulfide bonds were observed potentially playing a crucial role in the docking process. The interaction between the receptor and the ligand was found to be interactive which could turn out to help develop strategies to assist in creating potential pharmacological drug- based therapies.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Strategies to Overcome Drug Resistance: Learning from Various Kingdoms
    molecules Review Comparison of Strategies to Overcome Drug Resistance: Learning from Various Kingdoms Hiroshi Ogawara 1,2 1 HO Bio Institute, Yushima-2, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0034, Japan; [email protected]; Tel.: +81-3-3832-3474 2 Department of Biochemistry, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Noshio-2, Kiyose, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan Received: 4 May 2018; Accepted: 15 June 2018; Published: 18 June 2018 Abstract: Drug resistance, especially antibiotic resistance, is a growing threat to human health. To overcome this problem, it is significant to know precisely the mechanisms of drug resistance and/or self-resistance in various kingdoms, from bacteria through plants to animals, once more. This review compares the molecular mechanisms of the resistance against phycotoxins, toxins from marine and terrestrial animals, plants and fungi, and antibiotics. The results reveal that each kingdom possesses the characteristic features. The main mechanisms in each kingdom are transporters/efflux pumps in phycotoxins, mutation and modification of targets and sequestration in marine and terrestrial animal toxins, ABC transporters and sequestration in plant toxins, transporters in fungal toxins, and various or mixed mechanisms in antibiotics. Antibiotic producers in particular make tremendous efforts for avoiding suicide, and are more flexible and adaptable to the changes of environments. With these features in mind, potential alternative strategies to overcome these resistance problems are discussed. This paper will provide clues for solving the issues of drug resistance. Keywords: drug resistance; self-resistance; phycotoxin; marine animal; terrestrial animal; plant; fungus; bacterium; antibiotic resistance 1. Introduction Antimicrobial agents, including antibiotics, once eliminated the serious infectious diseases almost completely from the Earth [1].
    [Show full text]
  • PAGE 1 Please Contact Us On: Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Special Next Day Delivery Before 1Pm – Royal Mail - £6.50
    Please contact us on: Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Special Next Day Delivery before 1pm – Royal Mail - £6.50 Common Name Scientific Name Aladdin Purple Femur Chilobrachys Species Atlantic Forest Gary Oligoxystre Species Bahia Scarlet Lasiodora Klugi Black Velvet Acanthoscurria Musculosa Blue Fang Ephebopus Cyanognathus Blue Femur Beauty Euathlus Pulcherrimaklassi Bolivian Dwarf Cyriocosmus Perezmilesi Borneo ‘Ebony’ Selencosmia Species ‘Ebony’ Brazilian Black Grammostola Pulchra Brazilian Black & White Nhandu Coloratovillosus Brazilian Pink – Platyomma Pamphobeteus Sp. Platyomma Burmese Bird Eater Chilobrachys Burmensis Cambodian Tiger Haplopelma Longipes Cameroon Red Baboon Hysterocrates Gigas Chaco Golden Stripe Knee Grammostola Pulchripes Chilean Flame Euathlus Sp. Chilean Ocellated Euathlus Vulpinus Chilean Rose Grammastola Rosea Chinese Earth Tiger Chilobrachys Guangxiensis Cobalt Blue Haplopelma Lividum Columbian Blue Bottle Pseudhapalopus sp Columbian Brown Pamphobeteus Fortis Columbian Lesser Black Xenethis Immanis Costa Rican Red Brachypelma Angustum Costa Rican Tiger Rump Cyclosternum Fasciatum Costa Rican Zebra Aphonopelma Seemanni Curly Hair Tarantula Brachypelma Albopilsum Dwarf Black Tiger Cyricosmus Bertae Ecuador Purple Pink Toe Avicularia Purpurea Emerald Skeleton Ephebopus Uatuman Feather Leg Baboon Stromatopelma Calceata Flame Rump Tree Spider Thrixopelma Ockerti Fort Hall Baboon Pterinochilus Lugardi Fringed Earth Tiger Phlogius Sp. Fringed Ornamental Poecilotheria Ornata Giant
    [Show full text]
  • Remipede Venom Glands Express A
    MBE Advance Access published November 7, 2013 The First Venomous Crustacean Revealed by Transcriptomics and Functional Morphology: Remipede Venom Glands Express a Unique Toxin Cocktail Dominated by Enzymes and a Neurotoxin Bjo¨rn M. von Reumont,*,1 Alexander Blanke,2 Sandy Richter,3 Fernando Alvarez,4 Christoph Bleidorn,3 and Ronald A. Jenner*,1 1Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom 2Center of Molecular Biodiversity (ZMB), Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany 3Molecular Evolution and Systematics of Animals, Institute for Biology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany 4Coleccio´nNacionaldeCrusta´ceos, Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Auto´noma de Me´xico, Mexico *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]. Associate editor: Todd Oakley Sequence data and transcriptome sequence assembly have been deposited at GenBank (accession no. GAJM00000000, BioProject PRJNA203251). All alignments used for tree reconstructions of putative venom proteins are available at: http://www.reumont.net/ vReumont_etal2013_MBE_FirstVenomousCrustacean_TreeAlignments.zip. Downloaded from Abstract Animal venoms have evolved many times. Venomous species areespeciallycommoninthreeofthefourmaingroupsof arthropods (Chelicerata, Myriapoda, and Hexapoda), which together represent tens of thousands of species of venomous http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/ spiders, scorpions, centipedes, and hymenopterans. Surprisingly, despite their great diversity of body plans, there is no unambiguous evidence that any crustacean is venomous. We provide the first conclusive evidence that the aquatic, blind, and cave-dwelling remipede crustaceans are venomous and that venoms evolved in all four major arthropod groups. We produced a three-dimensional reconstruction of the venom delivery apparatus of the remipede Speleonectes tulumensis, showing that remipedes can inject venom in a controlled manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 2020, 21, 97-109
    97 Send Orders for Reprints to [email protected] Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 2020, 21, 97-109 REVIEW ARTICLE ISSN: 1389-2010 eISSN: 1873-4316 Current Pharmaceutical Nanoparticles Functionalized with Venom-Derived Peptides and Toxins Biotechnology Impact Factor: 1.516 The international for Pharmaceutical Applications journal for timely in-depth reviews in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology BENTHAM SCIENCE Ana P. dos Santos1, Tamara G. de Araújo2 and Gandhi Rádis-Baptista3,* 1Program of Post-graduation in Pharmaceutical Sciences (FFEO/UFC), Federal University of Ceara, Ceara, Brazil; 2Department of Pharmacy, Federal University of Ceara, Ceara, Brazil; 3Institute of Marine Sciences, Federal Universi- ty of Ceara, Ceara, Brazil Abstract: Venom-derived peptides display diverse biological and pharmacological activities, making them useful in drug discovery platforms and for a wide range of applications in medicine and pharma- ceutical biotechnology. Due to their target specificities, venom peptides have the potential to be devel- oped into biopharmaceuticals to treat various health conditions such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic pain. Despite the high potential for drug development, several limitations preclude the di- A R T I C L E H I S T O R Y rect use of peptides as therapeutics and hamper the process of converting venom peptides into pharma- ceuticals. These limitations include, for instance, chemical instability, poor oral absorption, short half- life, and off-target cytotoxicity. One strategy to overcome these disadvantages relies on the formula- Received: January 25, 2019 Revised: April 17, 2019 tion of bioactive peptides with nanocarriers. A range of biocompatible materials are now available that Accepted: May 08, 2019 can serve as nanocarriers and can improve the bioavailability of therapeutic and venom-derived pep- tides for clinical and diagnostic application.
    [Show full text]