DOCSLIB.ORG

Corporate Strategies for Addressing Climate Change

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Corporate Strategies for Addressing Climate Change Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change in fulfillment of the Masters Opus requirement of the School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Michigan Project Team: Douglas Glancy Michael Horn Scott Pryor Mark Shahinian Greg Shopoff Faculty Advisor: Andrew J. Hoffman November 2006 DRAFT – Please do not cite, quote or distribute Acknowledgements The project team would like to thank the Pew Center on Global Climate Change for supporting this project. In particular, Truman Semans and John Woody were quite helpful in gaining access to the subject companies and in providing feedback on our report. We would also like to thank the countless people at the subject companies for their time and effort. This project could not have been completed without them, and we sincerely hope that our work provides guidance in their efforts to address climate change. We are grateful to have had Professor Andy Hoffman as our Project Advisor. He put many hours into this project, and is a large reason for its success. And finally, we are indebted to our family and friends who have supported us throughout this effort, putting up with sleepless nights, endless conversations about climate change, and a few gripe sessions. 2 DRAFT – Please do not cite, quote or distribute Table of Contents Executive Summary . 4 List of Figures . 16 Research Findings I. Introduction . 17 A. Scope . 20 B. Methodology . 20 C. Overview . 22 II. Strategy Development . 24 A. Drivers and Outcomes. 24 B. Differentiating Energy Efficiency and GHG Reductions . 28 C. Calculating the Bottom Line . 30 D. Calculating GHG Emissions . 32 E. Funding and Investment . 34 III. Organizational Integration . 36 A. Senior Leadership. 36 B. From Idea to Adoption . 38 C. Overcoming Resistance. 40 IV. External Outreach . 44 A. Reputation Benefits. 44 B. Public Reporting. 45 C. Targeted Audience. 47 D. External Resistance . 48 E. Partnerships . 49 V. Policy . 50 A. Policy is on the Horizon . 52 B. Policy Mechanisms . 54 VI. Conclusion . 58 A. Timing is Critical . 58 B. Challenges Ahead . 61 Case Studies Cinergy: Managing “Stroke of the Pen” Risk . 65 Swiss Re: Staying One Step Ahead, Not Two . 91 DuPont: Shifting from Risk Management to Business Opportunity. 117 Alcoa: Weaving Climate Change into the Business Case . .144 The Shell Group: Maintaining a Seat at the Table. 166 Whirlpool: Don’t Switch Tracks When the Train is Already Moving. 187 Glossary. 203 Endnotes. 207 3 DRAFT – Please do not cite, quote or distribute Executive Summary Climate change is now a bright, blinking issue on the radar screens of companies worldwide. Companies have started addressing climate change for a myriad of reasons – reasons as diverse as their respective business models. The academic and business literature has done a fairly good job of exploring why companies are addressing climate change. This study examines how they are addressing climate change. It explores the risks, rewards, opportunities and barriers surrounding corporate action on climate change and provides insight into the strategies employed by companies that have led the way in taking early action. The lessons learned by early actors can inform the efforts of those who follow. Climate change presents companies with significant risks, uncertainties, and an increasing number of market opportunities. Companies now confront a patchwork of regional regulation. In addition, most companies in our survey expect federal regulations to limit GHG emissions within the next decade. The unknowns of potential regulation create uncertainty, and therefore risk, for businesses making strategic decisions. Volatile energy prices wreak havoc on cost structures, severely impairing the ability to accurately forecast profitability. Large storm events have caused companies to think differently about the physical risks of climate change. Accumulating scientific evidence, coupled with these large storms, has boosted public awareness, leading to changing consumer preferences. Companies are looking at these changing preferences and 4 DRAFT – Please do not cite, quote or distribute identifying market opportunities, broadening the traditional risk-mitigation- centered approach to climate change. The focus of this study is “climate-related strategies,” defined as the set of goals and implementation plans within a corporation that either aim to reduce GHG emissions, or that significantly reduce GHG emissions as a co-benefit. This includes strategies and measures for achieving near-term emission reductions from a company’s own operations; research, development, and investment in low-carbon production and process-related technologies; alternative products that have a more attractive carbon profile; energy-efficiency initiatives; reductions obtained through offsets and emissions trading; and activities to reduce “upstream” or “downstream” GHG emissions along their value chain. Methodology There are two primary research methods used in this study. The first method is a one-hundred question survey of twenty-seven members of the Business Environment Leadership Council (BELC) of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change1 and four non-BELC members.2 The second method is a set of six in- depth case studies of companies taking action (five member companies of the BELC3 and one non-BELC member).4 Each of these companies has a stated commitment to address climate change. The demographics represent a sample weighted toward large, publicly-held, North American-based, multi-national corporations. 5 DRAFT – Please do not cite, quote or distribute Findings This study examines four elements of climate-related corporate strategies – strategy development, organizational integration, external outreach and policy. This study focuses on the common aspects and recurring themes across strategies, but will also highlight unique and innovative practices. Strategy Development To develop an effective strategy, companies must understand their motivation for addressing climate change, identify options for GHG reductions, determine which options align with corporate goals and values, and find ways to fund the initiative. We found three primary drivers of climate-related strategies: cost savings, mitigation of risk and values-based reasons. These drivers are not mutually exclusive or comprehensive. Because profits are the ultimate measure of corporate success, many seek to make a link between GHG emission reductions and bottom-line results. Despite these efforts, the financial case for justifying such efforts remains vague. Therefore, companies have relied upon cost-saving energy efficiency to achieve GHG reductions, discussing the potential future value of managing risk and enhancing institutional knowledge in the present, and linking climate-related strategies to corporate culture and values. 6 DRAFT – Please do not cite, quote or distribute Cost savings are most closely tied to energy and operational efficiencies that deliver bottom-line results in the short-term. Energy efficiency is often easier to connect to traditional business strategy than GHG reductions. As an element of operating costs, energy use flows directly to the bottom-line and is therefore easier to communicate to employees. Furthermore, companies have been addressing energy as a cost issue for years, and in many industries it is a guarded strategic element. In contrast, risk mitigation seeks long-term payoff by managing the political, legal, price and physical risks associated with climate change. The most consistently- cited risk identified by companies is the uncertain political environment. However, an effort to reduce GHG emissions is a much newer – and trickier – concept than energy efficiency. There is no direct link to operating results, and the benefits are uncertain, often described as distant and speculative. While an effort to reduce GHG emissions is viewed as strategic at the corporate level, building a connection to the business unit and employee level has proven more challenging. Values-based reasons center on “doing the right thing” and addressing climate change because it is consistent with the corporate culture and values. Often, the targets of these values-based reasons are employees – both to allay the concerns about straying from the business plan described above and to improve employee morale. 7 DRAFT – Please do not cite, quote or distribute Methods of addressing climate change traditionally come in the form of either energy efficiency or GHG reduction initiatives. More recently, however, some companies have identified market opportunities within the climate change issue. Some are changing their product mix, while others are also pushing customers and suppliers to seek GHG reductions. While calculating the financial benefits is difficult, the process for measuring and tracking GHG emissions is more clearly defined. The GHG Protocol and other GHG accounting standards have established well-accepted principles and guidelines for corporate reporting of GHG emissions. However, without strict regulations in place, companies face two major issues: what method to use in accounting for emissions, and how to measure those emissions. These calculations require data that is not always available, sometimes prompting the development of new information systems. Another critical element of a climate-related strategy is funding. Some companies in this report simply utilize special pools of capital allocated to climate-related projects. Some lower their internal hurdle
Recommended publications
  • 2014 SUSTAINABILITY PROGRESS REPORT Growth SCIENCE IS at the HEART of OUR COMPANY

    2014 SUSTAINABILITY PROGRESS REPORT Growth SCIENCE IS at the HEART of OUR COMPANY

    Growth Commitment Results Impact Partners 2014 SUSTAINABILITY PROGRESS REPORT Growth SCIENCE IS AT THE HEART OF OUR COMPANY Throughout our 214-year history, DuPont has drawn on its scientific expertise to create a continual course of innovative, science-based solutions for our customers. Today our science is helping to solve critical problems on a global scale. As the world confronts serious challenges created by explosive population growth and economic development, DuPont’s 10,000 scientists and engineers are seeking the answers. Increasingly, our focus is on addressing growth markets where demand is driven by the need to ensure there is sufficient, nutritious and healthy food for people across the globe; to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels; and to protect people and the environment. With our vast storehouse of scientific knowledge, DuPont is uniquely positioned to combine areas of scientific expertise to create entirely new products and markets. Making a difference: building a secure energy future. While the demand for energy grows, the supply of fossil fuels will not. With a growing population, we will need to use those existing resources as efficiently and effectively as possible, and find better ways to harness renewable energy sources as well. These transitions will stimulate new industries and power clean economies. Making a difference: Making a difference: feeding the world. protecting what Ensuring that enough healthy, matters most. nutritious food is available for A growing population places people everywhere is one of the increased pressure on people and most critical challenges facing the environment. As the world humanity. Our focus on providing develops, humanity places greater for the needs of a growing value on both life and the earth we population will help developing all share.
  • Is Pollution Value-Maximizing? the Dupont Case

    Is Pollution Value-Maximizing? the Dupont Case

    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES IS POLLUTION VALUE-MAXIMIZING? THE DUPONT CASE Roy Shapira Luigi Zingales Working Paper 23866 http://www.nber.org/papers/w23866 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 September 2017 We thank Asher Schechter for research assistance, John Matsusaka, Cary Coglianese and Effi Benmellech for very useful comments, and participants in conferences and seminars in University of Chicago Booth School of Business, University of Chicago Law School, the American Law and Economics Association, The Society of Environmental Law and Economics Scholars, European Law and Economics Association, Israeli Law and Economics Association, IDC, Case Western University, and Columbia University. Financial support from the Stigler Center at the University of Chicago is gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2017 by Roy Shapira and Luigi Zingales. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Is Pollution Value-Maximizing? The DuPont Case Roy Shapira and Luigi Zingales NBER Working Paper No. 23866 September 2017 JEL No. K32,L21,Q52 ABSTRACT DuPont, one of the most respectable U.S. companies, caused environmental damage that ended up costing the company around a billion dollars. By using internal company documents disclosed in trials we rule out the possibilities that this bad outcome was due to ignorance, an unexpected realization, or a problem of bad governance.
  • Dupont Alcoa The Shell Whirlpool a a a a a a Group A

    Dupont Alcoa The Shell Whirlpool a a a a a a Group A

    + + Getting Ahead of the Curve: solutions + This report provides guidance to companies on + integrating climate-related concerns into their Corporate Strategies Getting Ahead of the Curve: corporate strategies and is also intended to help investors, analysts, policymakers, and NGOs Corporate Strategies interpret corporate climate change risk, opportunity, and action. The Pew Center on Global Climate That Address Climate Change That Address Climate Change Change was established by the Pew Charitable Trusts to bring a new cooperative approach and + critical scientific, economic, and technological + expertise to the global climate change debate. We inform this debate through wide-ranging analyses that add new facts and perspectives in four areas: policy (domestic and international), by economics, environment, and solutions. Andrew J. Hoffman THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN + Pew Center on Global Climate Change + 2101 Wilson Boulevard Suite 550 Arlington, VA 22201 Phone (703) 516 - 4146 www.pewclimate.org October 2006 CINERGY SWISS RE A DUPONT ALCOA THE SHELL WHIRLPOOL A A A A A A GROUP A Shifting From Risk Management to Business Opportunity DuPont*3 Once again, DuPont is transforming itself. One of the oldest companies in the United States, DuPont began as a black powder119 company in 1802; transformed into an explosives manufacturer in 1880; turned to polymers, paint, plastics and dyes in the early 1900’s; added energy to its portfolio in 1981; and now, as it enters its third century, is pursuing new business lines of agriculture, nutrition 120
  • A CSR-Perspective Monsanto Og Novozymes

    A CSR-Perspective Monsanto Og Novozymes

    Cand.Ling.Merc Copenhagen Business School, 2014 Master’s Thesis Monsanto and Novozymes – An Unusual Alliance? A CSR-Perspective Monsanto og Novozymes – En Usædvanlig Alliance? Et CSR-Perspektiv A Thesis by: Jonas Rusborg Frederiksen Cand.ling.merc – American Studies Supervisor: Steen Valentin, Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy Characters Allowed – 182.000 Characters Used – 181.528 A Thesis by: Jonas Rusborg Frederiksen 1 Cand.Ling.Merc Copenhagen Business School, 2014 Master’s Thesis Resumé Antallet af virksomhedsalliancer er steget markant i dette årtusinde, og er således et af de områder, hvor firmaer i større grad end tidligere satser på at kunne give sig selv konkurrencefordele. En sådan blev annonceret i december 2012, mellem danske Novozymes og amerikanske Monsanto. Alliancen indebærer et tæt samarbejde mellem de to firmaer, baseret på Novozymes bio-enzymer samt Monsantos ekstensive globale field-testing muligheder, for i samarbejde at transformere agrikulturen globalt. Det der optager dette speciale er derimod ikke selve indholdet af alliancen, men derimod de to firmaers håndteringer af deres sociale ansvar. Mere specifikt hvordan Novozymes, en af de ledende virksomheder på verdensplan med henblik på bæredygtighed, indgår en alliance med et firma som i 2013 blev kåret som ”The Worlds most Evil Company” og ligeledes var fokuspunktet for en protestaktion med over én million deltagere på verdensplan. Specialet er baseret på to research questions, hvor det første analyserer i, hvilken udstrækning den meget negative offentlige holdning til Monsanto er retfærdig, på baggrund af, hvordan firmaet agerer i henhold til deres sociale ansvar. Dette konkluderes på baggrund af en analyse af, hvordan Monsanto håndterer CSR, deres sociale ansvar, samt agerer i forhold til stakeholder- og issues-management og slutteligt at definere deres CSR-karakter ud fra, hvordan de taler, agerer og tænker.
  • A Case Study of How Dupont Reduced Its Environment Footprint: the Role of Organizational Change in Sustainability

    A Case Study of How Dupont Reduced Its Environment Footprint: the Role of Organizational Change in Sustainability

    A Case Study of How DuPont Reduced Its Environment Footprint: The Role of Organizational Change in Sustainability By Scot Holliday B.A., 1996, Boston University M.A., 2004, The George Washington University A Dissertation Submitted to The Faculty of The Graduate School of Education and Human Development of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Human Resource Development May 16, 2010 Dissertation directed by David R. Schwandt Professor of Human and Organizational Learning The Graduate School of Education and Human Development of The George Washington University certifies that Scot Holliday has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Education as of March 9, 2010. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. A Case Study of How DuPont Reduced Its Environment Footprint: The Role of Organizational Change in Sustainability Scot Holliday Dissertation Research Committee David R. Schwandt, Professor of Human and Organizational Learning, Dissertation Director Mark Starik, Professor of Strategic Management and Policy, Committee Member Susan Swayze, Assistant Professor of Education, Committee Member ii ©Copyright 2010 by Scot Holliday All rights reserved iii DEDICATION To my wife, Metri, for your compassion, understanding, tireless support, and always abundant love, and to our new son, Alex iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my dissertation committee—Dr. David Schwandt (Chair), Dr. Mark Starik, and Dr. Susan Swayze—for your guidance, reviews, and coaching on this dissertation. Some of the seeds you sowed have already sprouted and over the coming years will fully mature. I thank my outside examiners—Dr. Clyde Croswell and Dr.
  • The World According to Monsanto: Pollution, Corruption, and The

    The World According to Monsanto: Pollution, Corruption, and The

    BY THE WINNER OF THE 2009 RACHEL CARSON PRIZE SCIENCE $26.95 U.S. MONSANTO “As this powerful book makes clear, Monsanto’s innovations create more TO ACCORDING THE WORLD T he result of a remarkable three-year investigation problems than they solve—above all by helping to concentrate the food system in that took award-winning journalist and documen- ever fewer hands, with baleful consequences for the world’s small-scale farmers. tary filmmaker Marie-Monique Robin across four It’s the kind of reporting we need more of, and one hopes it will be at least a continents (North and South America, Europe, and Asia), The World According to Monsanto tells partial antidote to all the slick commercials with smiling peasants.” MARIE-MONIQUE ROBIN is an award-winning the little-known yet shocking story of this agribusi- —BILL McKIBBEN, author of Deep Economy French journalist and filmmaker. She received the ness giant—the world’s leading producer of GMOs 1995 Albert-Londres Prize, awarded to investigative “We are what we eat, and what we eat is rapidly being determined by (genetically modified organisms)—and how its new journalists in France. She is the director and one company, Monsanto. Monsanto’s seed and food dictatorship is based on “green” face is no less troubling than its PCB- and producer of over thirty documentaries and inves- Agent Orange–soaked past. tigative reports filmed in Latin America, Africa, corrupting regulatory processes, corrupting science, and destroying democracy. Europe, and Asia. We needed a book that told us the story in detail, with courage—The World Robin reports that, following its long history of According to Monsanto does just that.” manufacturing hazardous chemicals and lethal GEORGE HOLOCH has translated more than —VANDANA SHIVA, author of Earth Democracy and Stolen Harvest herbicides, Monsanto is now marketing itself as a twenty books, including Eric Hazan’s Notes on the THE WORLD ACCORDING TO “life sciences” company, seemingly convinced about Occupation (The New Press).
  • Outline of the CD

    Outline of the CD

    Color in Science, Art and Industry: The Inter-Society Color Council th 75 Anniversary CD Written and Compiled by Ellen C. Carter and Cynthia Sturke May 2006 Contents Preface Introduction Part I ISCC Through the Years Chapter 1 The Early History of the ISCC Chapter 2 Membership Member Bodies Individual Members Individual Member Group Local Color Groups Student Chapters Sustaining Members Honorary Members Chapter 3 Leaders Chapter 4 Meetings Annual Meetings Williamsburg Conferences AIC and International Conferences Long-Range Planning Meetings Chapter 5 Project Committees and Interest Groups Chapter 6 Awards Godlove Macbeth Nickerson Service Award Part II ISCC Today Chapter 7 The office Chapter 8 Constitution, Bylaws, and Standing Rules Chapter 9 Communications ISCC News Website Publications Color Research and Application Chapter 10 Jubilee Week 2000 Festivities ISCC President’s Welcome Schedule for the Annual Meeting Annual Meeting Abstracts Program for the Symposium Schedule for the Symposium Abstracts for the Symposium CIE Division 1 Meetings Part III The People Brief biographical sketches of members past and present Preface In the year of 1931 New York City was a busy place. In May the Empire State Building opened as the tallest building in the world. In another part of the city, the Museum of Science and Industry, two meetings took place. These meetings culminated in the formation of a new North American organization the Inter-Society Color Council. In the same year the CIE made the first major recommendations regarding colorimetric standards in 1931 by approving the Standard Colorimetric Observer. These recommendations formed the basis of modern colorimetry and a new era was begun.
  • Dupont 2016 Global Reporting Initiative Report Table of Contents

    Dupont 2016 Global Reporting Initiative Report Table of Contents

    DUPONT 2016 GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................1 SOCIAL ..................................................................................................32 About DuPont ............................................................................................. 1 Management Approach ........................................................................... 32 Contact Us .................................................................................................. 1 Our People and Employment ................................................................... 32 Labor Relations and Freedom of Association ......................................... 34 EXECUTIVE STATEMENT .....................................................................2 Occupational Health and Safety.............................................................. 35 ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE ................................................................3 Training and Education ............................................................................ 36 Commitments to External Initiatives ......................................................... 3 Diversity and Equal Opportunity .............................................................. 37 Human Rights........................................................................................... 38 DUPONT 2015 SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS .............................................................5